Abstract AAV or EFV - Amphibious Tracked Vehicle 35-65 t for US Marine Corps - Iteration 1st 2013...
-
Upload
andrey-f-engineer -
Category
Automotive
-
view
102 -
download
0
Transcript of Abstract AAV or EFV - Amphibious Tracked Vehicle 35-65 t for US Marine Corps - Iteration 1st 2013...
12
3
0
45
678
910
12
3
0
45
678
910
https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrey-f-engineer-845b3a76
Designed by Andrey Fe-mail: [email protected]
Introduction.Ladies and Gentlemen.For more than 12 years, General Dynamics is building an Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) also called Assault Amphibious Vehicle(AAV) for the U.S. Marine Corps. The project has been criticized and DARPA is currently looking for alternative ideas. This projectcalling "DARPA FANG Challenges" (see more information at <http://vehicleforge.org/about>).
"Why not?" I thought. But, unfortunately for me, this competition is only available to U.S. citizens. However, I have an idea and Ihave done some work on illustrating the idea.Let me introduce to you some thoughts and illustrated variations in the design of Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (AssaultAmphibious Vehicle).
What Is the EFV?
BrieflyThe EFV would be an armored, fully tracked infantry combat vehicle operated by a three-person crew that can carry 17 combat-equipped Marines. It is to be a self-deploying, high-speed amphibious vehicle capable of transporting Marines from ships toobjectives inland and aims to have the speed, maneuvering capabilities, fire power, and protection to operate with main battletanks on land. It is intended to have a 20-knot speed in the water and a 345-mile range ashore with a 45-kilometer-per-hourspeed on hard-surfaced roads. The EFV is to be designed to have modular armor and expanded mine blast protection and mounta 30mm high-velocity cannon in a stabilized turret. The EFV is also supposed to be able to communicate in joint networks andoperate as part of a joint land force. There are to be two EFV variants. The EFV-P1 would carry a Marine rifle squad and itsequipment and provide direct fire support during combat operations. The EFV-C1 variant would provide command and controlcapabilities for commanders and their staffs.
let's do some intermediate calculations:17 combat-equipped Marines = 17*300 = 5100 lbs. or 5100*0.4536=2313.36 kg20-knot speed = 20*1.852=37.04 km/h = 23.016 mph345-mile range ashore = 345*1.6094=555.243 km45-kilometer-per-hour speed = 45/1.6094=27.9617 mphApproximate operational time to refuel after landing = 555.243/45=12.3387 h
In detailAmphibious Combat VehicleRequest for Information (RFI)General Information:Contracting Office Address:Department of the Navy, United States Marine Corps, Marine Corps Systems Command, 2200 Lester Street, Quantico, VA,22134-5010
Message to Industry:The Marine Corps will be taking a collaborative approach with industry in order to produce a more affordable amphibiouscapability. Interested partners should look at the Marine Corps amphibious requirements for an Amphibious Combat Vehicle,Marine Personnel Carrier and AAV legacy upgrades as discussed in this and the other amphibious RFIs as a Family of Systems. TheMarine Corps would like to see industry focus on affordability by designing/proposing solutions that will reduce the operational andsupport costs over the life cycle and consider such things as commonality, modularity of proposed solutions and interoperabilityamong Systems of Systems.
These solutions should take into consideration emerging technologies and provide for growth over the next 15 years. Additionally,the Marine Corps is interested in hearing from industry strategies they would use to lower their procurement costs for theirproposed solutions.
Description:Title 10, U.S. Code, directs the Marine Corps to develop equipment used by landing forces in amphibious operations.
The Assault Amphibious Vehicle (AAV) fleet is aging. Should the current AAV Family of Vehicles (FoV) not be replaced operationsthat assure access would become either single dimensional operations, relying entirely upon air assault of infantryman, or berequired to use a mid-20th century means of surface transport that lacks needed capabilities such as firepower, autonomous ship
Thoughts and illustrated ideas about Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle(Assault Amphibious Vehicle).1 июля 2013 г.20:18
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.1
required to use a mid-20th century means of surface transport that lacks needed capabilities such as firepower, autonomous shipto shore movement, ground mobility, and over the horizon range.
The current AAV does not meet the needs of the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) developed in response to the emergingthreat environment. Use of such equipment and tactics could result in unacceptable loss of life or mission failure.
In response to a validated operational need and an aging fleet of assault amphibian vehicles, the Marine Corps requirement for anamphibious vehicle that will provide increased force protection, water speed, land mobility, lethality, and survivability, whilebalancing capacity, mobility, transportability and total ownership costs over the current AAV is enduring.
The basic chassis shall be a combat vehicle that is capable of performing across the full Range of Military Operations (ROMO).
Core characteristics of the vehicle family will be as follows:
Maneuver.While the ideal capability would be for the vehicle to transit from well over the horizon at a high rate of speed, this may prove tobe unaffordable. At a minimum, the vehicle must be able to autonomously deliver a Marine infantry squad from amphibiousshipping at launch distances at, or beyond the horizon (minimum of 12 miles) with a speed to enable the element of surprise in thebuildup ashore, and provide combat-ready Marines at the objective. The vehicle must be able to execute a seamless transition fromsea to land and maneuver with a mechanized task force for sustained operations ashore.
Let's continue the intermediate calculationsminimum of 12 miles distance from the ship-carrier to shore 12*1,60935=19,3122 km*I should note that generally believed, under present conditions, this distance is considered to be insufficient.Approximate operational time before landing = 19.32/37=0.5222 h
Protection.The materiel approaches must enable the commander to employ maneuver forces in threat environments while minimizing losses
en route to objectives or while performing mounted missions.
Protection characteristics must be applied to direct fire, indirect fire, and mines/IED threats. In order to address the spectrum ofoperating environments, this protection can be modular (i.e., applied incrementally as the situation dictates).
Sustainment.The materiel approaches must enable the commander to employ mounted maneuver forces at greater ranges to objectives and
allow them to remain engaged while performing missions for greater durations than the current system. They should enable theMarine Corps to rapidly integrate emerging technologies through the use of open architecture and reconfigure the interior tosupport alternative mission loads including logistics provisions (55gal drums etc.,) heavy weapons (mortar/rockets) and medicalevacuations (litters).
Situational awareness.The materiel approaches must enable the commander to employ mounted maneuver forces with improved connectivity and real-time situational awareness, whether en route or on the objective.
Lethality.The materiel approach must enable the commander to employ mechanized forces with the capability to engage/destroy threat
peer vehicles and provide direct fire support to dismounted infantry in the attack.
The following required capabilities identified by the Marine Corps must be addressed by the amphibious vehicle:
1. The capability to rapidly project force directly to the objective from strategic and operational distances.2. Forcible entry capabilities combined with lift capabilities that facilitate maneuver from strategic and operational off-shoredistances and deliver forces where the adversary does not expect.3. The capability to avoid a tactical pause from the waterline.4. The capability to maneuver with the M1A1 in a mechanized task force.5. The capability to increase force survivability through the use of speed, lethality, modular armor, reduced signature(heat/visibility) and the ability to apply force from standoff distances.6 The capability to connect to the Global Information Grid, and enable Over-the-Horizon, On-The-Move communications, CombatIdentification, and Battle-staff communications to provide battlefield situational awareness.7. The capability to deliver lethal direct fire to enemy forces and Armored Personnel Carriers/Infantry Fighting Vehicles from astabilized system with a precision fire control system during day/night operations.8. The capability to maximize fuel efficiency without realizing performance degradation during operational assaults.
These requirements are not mutually exclusive or collectively exhaustive, meaning that we are requesting trade space feedbackfrom industry.
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.2
from industry.
The amphibious vehicle must be configured in multiple variants. Basic variants desired include:Squad Maneuver / Fighting VehicleCommand and Control (C2)Recovery and Maintenance
Let's sum up the requirements and draw up approximate technical task for the project.*Here and below, we consider only overall dimensions and mass characteristics.
Objectives Known parameters Way to achieve the objectivesManeuver /water
Speed 37.04 km/h (23 mph)Range 20 km (12 miles).
Type hull "sea sled" (theoretical drawings see below).
Seaworthiness (course stability, transverse stability and smallshock loads when moving through the waves).
•
Relatively easy access to the hydro-gliding mode.•The ability to maintain a nearly constant speed over a wide rangeof load changes.
•
The potential to reach speeds above 40 km/h at a specific powerof propulsion for more than 60 hp/ton.
•
This type of hull has the following features :
Retractable Suspension and tracks.
Maneuver /ground
Speed 45 km/h (28 mph)Range 556 km (345 miles).
Specific power of propulsion more than 15 hp/ton.
Protection Modular armor and expandedmine blast protection.
Spaced-laminate armor system with reactive armor.
Sustainment /autonomy
Operational time to refuel andreloading ammunition 13 h.
Sufficient stocks of the fuel and ammunition.
Sustainment /variability
Open architecture and reconfigurethe interior to support alternativemission loads including logisticsprovisions (55gal drums etc.,)heavy weapons (mortar/rockets)and medical evacuations (litters).
Rapid installation and dismounting system (including in the fieldconditions) of modules (containers) for different purposes.
Along the boards above the tracks.•Between the tracks.•
Ability to change the placement of propulsion in field conditions in thetwo variants:
Ability of the vehicle without modules to be cargo carrier.
Lethality 30mm high-velocity cannon in astabilized turret.
A variety of weapons with a wide range of ammunition types fordifferent purposes.Multi-directional (multi-channel) firing.
Fuel efficiency Multi-engine propulsion system.
Payload Min. 17 combat-equippedMarines.OrMin. 2313.36 kg (5100 lbs.)payload.
Universal troop and cargo modules.Ability of the vehicle without modules to be cargo carrier (including thetransportation of ISO-containers).
Theoretical drawings of ships "sea sled" type.
Uffa Fox Sea Sled Albert Hickman Sea Sled
Well, let's take a look at the preliminary design of the Assault Amphibious Vehicle Multipurpose Modular Middle weight InfantryFighting Vehicle and possible vehicles of these family.
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.3
336611959,813440
Infantry Fighting Vehicle 1
530
8128 848,49
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
17202000
3900
,55
450
2866
4000
716,75
859,01
3900
,55
3145
,27
3120
,27
3261
,27
3430
,27
3795
,55
3950
,55
6,94
°
90,00
°
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
Main specifications.
Type Amphibious Tracked Vehicle
Designprinciple
Multipurpose Modular Middle weight MMM
Variant(Payload Set)
Infantry Fighting Vehicle 1 IFV1
Abbreviation AAV-MMM-IFV1
Specifications Approximately Weight, kg lbs. Volume, lWeight Gross vehicle weight fully loaded
Basic carrier (without reactive armor)Payload
Basic carrier (without reactive armor. Fuelsystem volume 1 300 l)Payload
65 000
38 18026 820
35 98029 020
143 300
84 17359 128
79 32363 978
85 600(max. draft 2 460 mm)
Length 11 960 mm (471 in)
Width 4 000 mm (157.5 in)
Height 3 950 mm (155.5 in) (top of the missilelauncher)
Crew4 fully equipped crew member
5604*140
1 235
Passengers
17 fully equipped x1.5 Marines (16+1) x 175 kg(386 lbs.)1 UGV 1900x1000x600 mm (74.8x39.4x23.6 in)Or25 fully equipped Marines (24+1) x 140 kg(309 lbs.)
3 600
17*175=2 980
600Or
25*0.140=3 500
7 937
6 570
1 323
7 716
Armor
HullFront
Aluminum alloy. Density up to 3000 kg/cub. m.
Top 30 mm
BortBottom 20 mm
Top 30 mm
Rear 20 mmBottom 15 mmTop
Bottom 30 mm
Tailboard / cover 15 mm
ModulesTop
Troop module 15 mmWeapon module 20 / 5 mm
Bort, Front, Rear, BottomTroop module 5 mmWeapon module 5 mm
Turret 20 mm
14 180
11 700
1 580450300150
1 130400730
900
31 261
25 794
3 483992662330
2 491882
1 609
1 984
4 727
3 900
527150100
50377133244
300
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.4
ReactiveArmor
Armor Tiles
HullFrontTop 495х495х245 mm Armor Tiles x 35Bottom (partly) 245х245х95 mm Armor Tiles x106BortTop 495х495х245 mm Armor Tiles x 82Bottom 245х245х95 mm Armor Tiles x 368Rear 245х245х95 mm Armor Tiles x 70Bottom --TopTailboard / cover 495х495х245 mm Armor Tilesx 35
ModulesTroop module 495х495х245 mm Armor Tiles x24Weapon module 495х495х245 mm ArmorTiles x 3
Turret495х495х245 mm Armor Tiles x 35245х245х95 mm Armor Tiles x 40
8 002
6 192495х495х245 mm Armor
Tiles x 152 = 4 560
245х245х95 mm ArmorTiles x 544 = 1 632
810495х495х245 mm Armor
Tiles x 27 = 810
1 000495х495х245 mm Armor
Tiles x 35 = 900
245х245х95 mm ArmorTiles x 40 = 100
17 641
13 651
10 053
3 598
1 786
2 205
15 820
12 200495х495х245 mm Armor
Tiles x 152 = 9 100
245х245х95 mm ArmorTiles x 544 = 3 100
1 620495х495х245 mm Armor
Tiles x 27 = 1 620
2 000495х495х245 mm Armor
Tiles x 35 = 1 800
245х245х95 mm ArmorTiles x 40 = 200
Mainarmament
Turret170 x 1200 mm Missile Launcher x 2Or 120 x 1200 mm Missile Launcher x 240 x 255 mm CTAS Automatic Cannon x 240 x 53 mm Automatic Grenade Launcher x 212.7 × 99 mm NATO M2 Browning MachineGun x 27.62 x 51 mm NATO M240 Machine Gun x 25.56х45 mm NATO M249 Machine Gun x 2
Remote Controlled Weapon Stations Rear40 x 53 mm Automatic Grenade Launcher x 212.7 × 99 mm NATO M2 Browning MachineGun x 27.62 x 51 mm NATO M240 Machine Gun x 2
1 400
1 150200
680100
1203020
250100120
30
3 087
2 535441
1 499220
2656644
551220265
66
Ammunition
Turret / Weapon Module170 x 1200 mm Missiles - up to 90Or 120 x 1200 mm Missiles in launch tubes40 x 255 mm CTAS - up to 1 392 (25% APFSDS-T)40 x 53 mm Grenades - up to 2 73612.7 × 99 mm NATO Cartridges - up to 7 6967.62 x 51 mm NATO Cartridges - up to 14 8205.56х45 mm NATO Cartridges - up to 25 000
Remote Controlled Weapon Stations Rear40 x 53 mm Grenades - up to 50412.7 × 99 mm NATO Cartridges - up to 1 8207.62 x 51 mm NATO Cart ridges - up to 4 592
9 070
8 5402 740
3 170830
1 100380320
530160250120
19 996
18 8286 041
6 9891 8302 425
838706
1 169353551265
Engine MTU HPD V-16 2000 bhp diesel engine x 24 000 hp(I) (bhp) (2 982 kW)
4 300Without inlet and outlet
9 480 4 300Without inlet and outlet
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.5
Air cleaningsystem
Exhaustsystem
4 000 hp(I) (bhp) (2 982 kW)OrMTU HPD V-8 1000 bhp diesel engine x 44 000 hp(I) (bhp) (2 982 kW)
2 modules 4064 x 840 x 630 mm(160x33.1x24.8 in)
Without inlet and outletducts
Without inlet and outletducts
Coolingsystem
50% power - two water to air radiators (airsection).50% or 100% power - two water to water heatexchangers in water jets (water section).
1 000(Air section)
2 205 1 700(Air section)
Transmission Electro-mechanical and/or Hydro-mechanicaltransmission.Water propulsion through two retractable 430mm (16.9 in)-diameter water jets.*
6 400 14 110 2 400
Suspensionand tracks
Retractable.Independent Hydraulic Suspension Units.OrMulti-link torsion bar suspension.
9 700 21 385
Power /weight
100% power - 61.5 bhp/ton50% power - 30.7 bhp/ton25% power - 15.3 bhp/ton
Fuel system 3 500 l (924.6 gallons)Minimum 1 300 l (343.42 gallons)
3 500 7 716 4 800(Potential volume up to)
Modules(frame,Interior)
Troop module 4064x1690x1744 mm(160x66.5x68.7 in)Weapon module 4064х3420х1081 mm(160x134.6x42.6 in)
970300
670
2 139662
1 477
27 00311 978
15 025
Otherequipment Hull
Modules
2 6181 3001 318
5 7722 8662 906
Operationaltime
Fuelconsumption
Specific fuel consumption 160 g/(bhp*h)(0.191 l/(bhp*h))100% power (water) - 1 h - 762 l (201.3gallons)50% power (land) - 1 h - 381 l (100.65 gallons)25% power (land) - 12 h - 2286 l (603.9 gallons)Total - 14 h - 3429 l (905.85 gallons)
Speed
Operationalrange
100% power (water) - 40 km/h (24.9 mph) - 40km (24.9 miles)50% power (road) - 70 km/h (43.5mph) - 70km (43.5 miles)25% power (ground) - 45 km/h (28 mph)- 540km (335.5 miles)Total - 46.4 km/h (28.8 mph)- 650 km (403.9miles)
* Water jets diameter can be increased with increase vehicle length.
SWOT analysis of the project.
Features Strengths Weaknesses
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.6
Features Strengths WeaknessesHull. Type of the hull is based on Uffa Fox Sea Sled and
Albert Hickman Sea Sled.
High seaworthiness.•Relatively easy access to the hydro-gliding mode.•
Sea Sled Main Advantages is:
Increase complexity of the design andbuilding.
•
The relatively large consumption of materialthe bottom of the hull.
•
The relative complexity of the suspension.•Increase vehicle weight.•Increase vehicle height.•
Modularity. Increase unsinkable.•The possibility to build different variants of the vehicleduring the mission. (Examples see below).
•
The possibility to use Weapon Modules as WeaponStations on the ship -carrier and on the other carriers.
•
The possibility to use Weapon Stations as AutonomousGround Weapon Stations.
•
The possibility to design the system of automaticseparation (ejection) modules in the case of sinking orammunition explosion.
•
The ability transportation of 20' high-cube container.•
Increase modules weight.•Increase vehicle weight.•Increase vehicle height.•
Armor Ability to build spaced-laminate armor system. Up to 6layers with retractable exterior false boards.
Reactive armor. Almost complete vehicle protection.•The possibility change armor tiles to the empty tiles (fuel/ water cells / tanks) in the partly unarmored carriermode.
•Increase vehicle height.
Mountingmethod of theReactive armor.
Increase the borts rigidity. Increase minimum vehicle width.
Mane WeaponModule,Weapon andTurret.
The ability to mounting external radar units on IFV turretand two additional retractable Missiles launchers(170x3200 mm Missile x up to 10).
•
Turret with light variant M256 120 mmSmoothbore Cannon.
•
Turret with light variant 155 mm Howitzer.•
Universal design allows to build modules with differentweapons with minimal design changes.
•
Increase vehicle height.
Several weaponmodules(stations).
Provides multi-directional (multi-channel) firing. Increase vehicle weight.•Increase the complexity of the fire controlsystem and sights.
•
Ammunition. Relatively large stock of ammunition provides highfirepower and autonomy.
Increase vehicle weight.
Fuel. Relatively large stock of fuel provides high mobility andautonomy.
Increase vehicle weight.
Opportunities ThreatsPossibility of the high level unification with theAmphibious Ground Combat Vehicle project. (increasearmor weight up to 21 000 kg + 8 000 kg reactive armor).
•
Possibility of using as Coast Guard Amphibious Vehicle.•Development of this project in the project of a high-speed amphibious tank.
•
Development of this project in the project of a large-payload high-speed amphibious (75 000 kg payload). This
•
Additional decks for combat use Weaponmodules and Weapon stations on theship.
•
Additional handling and lifting equipmentto provide the rapid assembly (mounting)of different sets of modules on vehicles.
•
The need to upgrade existing ships - carriers toprovide usability of this modular system:
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.7
payload high-speed amphibious (75 000 kg payload). Thisvehicle can be used as a substitute for LCAC, and as anamphibious tank-carrier in the Army.
of different sets of modules on vehicles.
The overall height can be reduced to 230-430 mm.•Armor weight can be increased with reducing payload.•
Notes:
List of main modules.
Modules list Dimensions Main PayloadTroop Modules (TM)
Troop Module Main(TMM)
4064x1690x1744 mm(160x66.5x68.7 in)
16 MarinesOr24 Marines
Troop Module Front(TMF)
4064x1690x1744 mm(160x66.5x68.7 in)
16 MarinesOr24 Marines
Troop Module Wide(TMW)
4064х3420х1744 mm(160x134.6x68.7 in)
32 Marines + 2 UGVOr48 Marines
Command Modules (CM)
Command Module Main(CMM)
4064х3420х1744 mm(160x134.6x68.7 in)
8+ Command personnel
Command Module Small(CMS)
4064x1690x1744 mm(160x66.5x68.7 in)
4+ Command personnel
Weapon Modules (WM)
Weapon Module (without turret)(WM)
4064х3420х1081 mm(160x134.6x42.6 in)
Weapon Module with FightingVehicle turret (Basic Set)(WMIFVB)
5390х4000х2376 mm(212.2x157.5x93.6 in)
See above
Weapon Module with FightingVehicle turret (Basic Set +Antiaircraft Set )(WMIFVA)
5390х4000х2376 mm(212.2x157.5x93.6 in)(with retracted searchingradar)
Similar to the Basic Mode +Retractable Missiles in launchers tubes (170x3200 mmMissile x up to 10).
•
External mounting module with retractable searching radar.•External mounting module with tracking radar.•
Weapon Module with Tank turret(WMT)
Design in progress.7651x3420x2376 mm(301.3x134.7x93.6 in)
ArmamentLight variant M256 120 mm Smoothbore Cannon x 140 x 255 mm CTAS Automatic Cannon x 140 x 53 mm Automatic Grenade Launcher x 112.7 × 99 mm NATO M2 Browning Machine Gun x 17.62 x 51 mm NATO M240 Machine Gun x 15.56х45 mm NATO M249 Machine Gun x 2
Ammunition120 x up to 1050 mm rounds - up to 12640 x 255 mm CTAS - approx. min. 342 (25% APFSDS-T)40 x 53 mm Grenades - approx. min. 66012.7 × 99 mm NATO Cartridges - approx. min. 2 1447.62 x 51 mm NATO Cart ridges - approx. min. 4 3165.56х45 mm NATO Cart ridges - 25 000
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.8
Weapon Module with Howitzerturret (155 mm x 52 cal.)(WMH)
Design in progress.Approximately11000x3420x2376 mm
Armament155 mm L52 Howitzer x 1+ additional armament
Ammunition155 x up to 1050 mm shells - approx. min. 84155 x up to 1050 mm propellant charges - approx. min. 84+ additional ammunition
Remote Controlled WeaponStations (RCWS)
Remote Controlled WeaponStation Rear R(L)(RCWSR)
Design in progress.964x840x667/1117 mm
Armament40 x 53 mm Automatic Grenade Launcher x 112.7 × 99 mm NATO M2 Browning Machine Gun x 17.62 x 51 mm NATO M240 Machine Gun x 1
Ammunition40 x 53 mm Grenades - up to 25212.7 × 99 mm NATO Cartridges - up to 9107.62 x 51 mm NATO Cart ridges - up to 2 296
Remote Controlled WeaponStation Main Light R(L)(RCWSML)
Design in progress.2968x840x277/677 mm
Remote Controlled WeaponStation Main Middle weight R(L)(RCWSMM)
Design in progress.2968x840x277/677 mm
Remote Controlled WeaponStation Main Heavy R(L)(RCWSMH)
Design in progress.4064x840x717/1117 mm
Remote Controlled WeaponStation Front R(L)(RCWSF)
Design in progress.
Crew Modules (CrM)
Crew Module Front (CrMF) Design in progress.
Crew Module IFV turret (CrMI) Design in progress.
Crew Module Tank turret (CrMT) Design in progress.
Additional Payload Modules Design in progress. "Small" modules with Payload (water, food, backpacks, toolsetc.).
Special Modules Design on request MLRS, Charging Vehicle, Medical Vehicle, Recovery andMaintenance Vehicle etc.
A few examples of possible modules sets.
Infantry Fighting Vehicle 1Quantity Type of Module
1 Weapon Module with Fighting Vehicle turret (Basic Set) (WMIFVB)
1 Troop Module Main (TMM)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Rear R(L) (RCWSR)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Infantry Antiaircraft Vehicle 1Quantity Type of Module
1 Weapon Module with Fighting Vehicle turret (Basic Set + Antiaircraft Set ) (WMIFVA)
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.9
1 Weapon Module with Fighting Vehicle turret (Basic Set + Antiaircraft Set ) (WMIFVA)
1 Troop Module Main (TMM)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Rear R(L) (RCWSR)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Command Fighting Vehicle or Infantry Fighting Vehicle 2WQuantity Type of Module
1 Weapon Module with Fighting Vehicle turret (Basic Set) (WMIFVB)
1 Command Module Main (CMM)ORTroop Module Wide (TMW)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Infantry Carrier Vehicle 2Quantity Type of Module
1 Troop Module Front (TMF)
1 Troop Module Main (TMM)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Rear R(L) (RCWSR)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Main Middle weight R(L) (RCWSMM)ORRemote Controlled Weapon Station Main Heavy R(L) (RCWSMH)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Central Command Vehicle or Infantry Carrier Vehicle 4W or Medical VehicleQuantity Type of Module
2 Command Module Main (CMM)ORTroop Module Wide (TMW)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Main Light R(L) (RCWSML)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Infantry Tank 1Quantity Type of Module
1 Weapon Module with Tank turret (WMT)
1 Troop Module Main (TMM)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Rear R(L) (RCWSR)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Command Tank or Infantry Tank 2WQuantity Type of Module
1 Weapon Module with Tank turret (WMT)
1 Command Module Main (CMM)ORTroop Module Wide (TMW)
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Payload Carrier Vehicle Thin High payload (with or without Marine Set)Quantity Type of Module
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Payload Carrier Vehicle Wide Low payload (with or without Marine Set)
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.10
Quantity Type of Module
2 Remote Controlled Weapon Station Front R(L) (RCWSF)
Attachments:
1. Infantry Antiaircraft Vehicle 12. Command Fighting Vehicle or Infantry Fighting Vehicle 2W3. Infantry Carrier Vehicle 24. Central Command Vehicle or Infantry Carrier Vehicle 4W or Medical Vehicle5. Infantry Tank 16. Command Tank or Infantry Tank 2W7. Payload Carrier Vehicle Thin High payload without Marine Set8. Payload Carrier Vehicle Thin High payload with Marine Set9. Payload Carrier Vehicle Wide Low payload without Marine Set
10. Payload Carrier Vehicle Wide Low payload with Marine Set11. Comparing with General Dynamics IFV12. Comparing with Abrams tank
That's all I want to say for now.I invite all interested persons to continue the discussion.
Thank You for attention.Best regards, Andrew.Dipl. Mechanical Engineer.
e-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
12.07.2013
Amphibious Tracked Vehicle MMM Стр.11
336611959,813440
Infantry Fighting Vehicle 1
530
8128 848,49
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
17202000
3900
,55
450
2866
4000
716,75
859,01
3900
,55
3145
,27
3120
,27
3261
,27
3430
,27
3795
,55
3950
,55
6,94
°
90,00
°
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
336611959,813440
530
8128 848,49
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
17202000
3900
,55
450
2866
4000
716,75
859,01
3900
,55
3145
,27
3120
,27
3261
,27
3430
,27
3795
,55
3950
,55
Infantry Fighting Vehicle 2WCommand Fighting Vehicle
6,94
°
90,00
°
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
336611959,813440
530
8128 848,49
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
17202000
3280
,14
450
2880
,14
4000
716,75
859,01
3280
,14
3145
,14
2866
3330
,14
Infantry Cattier Vehicle 2
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
3380
11959,813440
530
8128
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
450
4000
716,75
3920
,82
3514
,19
3920
,82
3804
,82
3784
,82
169048
42,2
8
3970
,82
Infantry Cattier Vehicle 4WCentral Command Vehicle
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
336611959,813440
530
8128 848,49
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
17202000
3883
,23
450
2866
4000
716,75
859,01
3791
,23
3171
,14
2866
12220,37
3933
,23
Infantry Tank 1
6,64
°
90,00
°
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
336611959,813440
530
8128 848,49
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
17202000
3883
,23
450
2866
4000
716,75
859,01
3791
,09
3171
,14
3514
,19
12220,37
3933
,23
Infantry Tank 2WCommand Tank
6,64
°
90,00
°
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
336611959,813440
530
8128 848,49
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
17202000
2866
450
2850
,36
4000
716,75
859,0150
00
2916
Payload Cattier Vehicle Thin High
2158
,65
2454
,77
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
11959,81
8128
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
4000
716,75
1973
,55
2850
,36
3401
2856
1543
,45
1719,06860,99
33663440
4454
,82
4454
,82
3578
,01
1510
3561
,01
4504
,82
24402449,43
Payload Cattier Vehicle Thin Haigh Marine Set
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
3366
11959,813440
530
8128
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
450
4000
716,75
1325
,36
2850
,3641
16
2850
,36 43
93,8
1
3982
,58
1543
,45
2591
2438
260,
81
4166
Payload Cattier Vehicle Wide Low
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
3366
11959,813440
530
8128
4000
3230
31 4064
475
31
16152780
450
4000
716,75
1325
,36
2850
,3644
54,8
2
2850
,36 44
54,8
2
2929
,82
1587
,46
2591
2438
2912
,82
4504
,82
24402449,43
Payload Cattier Vehicle Wide Low Marine Set
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2:
Designed by Andrew Engineere-mail: [email protected] 1: http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-engineer/76/b3a/845/Web 2: