DRAWING ABSTRACT INTRO. OVERVIEW Representational Abstract Non- representational.
ABSTRACT
description
Transcript of ABSTRACT
ABSTRACTDual classification systems (Dewey and LC) and a complex floor plan presented challenges for patrons in the main campus library at the University of Florida, despite ample signage. A much needed library expansion including a new Humanities and Social Sciences Library building will make it easier for patrons to locate library materials and has offered an opportunity to consider reclassification as a means of further simplifying patron access. This poster session will provide an overview of the innovative process for collection review, de-selection and reclassification of materials we employed by quickly and efficiently using the NOTIS database, library computer network, laptop computers and Excel spreadsheets. Coordinating this library-wide project required team efforts on many fronts. To coordinate the required workflow activities the project team had to consult and involve key staff in Technical Services, Access Services, Public Services, Collection Management and Systems. The collaborative efforts of all units involved were critical to the success of the project and to meeting our deadline. The presentation highlights the purpose, scope, planning, and implementation of the project. “Lessons learned” and recommendations are instructive for other libraries considering applying new technologies to reclassification projects. Our own library has already begun applying many of the lessons learned through this project in other efforts as we shift collections to allow construction to move forward.
INTRODUCTION
Scope
• Biography collection totaled about 15,000 items, locally classed with letter “B” before the Dewey number
Goals
• Simplify patron access and eliminate separate collection
• Simplify use of the monographic collection
• Improve patron training
• Facilitate information desk assistance with access to library materials
• Test innovative methods and highlight potential problems
Motivation
• Dual classification systems
• Complex library floor plan
• New library building
METHODS
Data gathering and spreadsheet
•Automated data extraction from NOTIS database
• Creation of "master file" spreadsheet, including:
• Title and NOTIS record number
• Dewey and LC call numbers
• Number of copies
• Owning location(s)
• Charges
Call number conversion
• Call number verification, assignment and conflict resolution between NOTIS/OCLC 050/090
• Automated call number search, extraction and flip
• Search Worldcat through OCLC Z39.50 using OCLC# or LCCN
• De-dupe in favor of call # in OCLC if numbers are identical
• Keep both call #s if not identical for manual review
• Search RLIN and State University Library databases if no call number available
• "Flip" call number after complete conversion
Server use and file folder structure
• Store master files on library server• Create separate folders for each CM and project leader• Assign read and write authorization to ensure transparency, accountability and limit inadvertent errors
Training and physical processing • Training
• CM workshop, written procedures, one-on-one sessions• Hired both new and experienced student assistants
• Processing• Scanning and re-labeling in stacks• Label printing in work area• Insert color-coded slips to indicate withdrawal or transfer
Public relations• Website• Ample signage• Project announcement in Library Newsletter
SPREADSHEET
Local NOTIS database Extract Dewey biographies into single
Excel file
LC #
extraction CM review: reclass OR w/d,
transfer
Harvest LC call #s from NOTIS (SUL), OCLC,
RLIN
Sort spreadsheet by CM
subject responsibility
Call # "flip" and insertion of withdrawal & location
transfer codes
LC call # verification &
assignment
Compile items selected for reclass & resort by Dewey
class
Break into smaller Dewey classed files by # of items to be processed per
session
Relabel, resort reclassed items by LC # and
reshelve
Create files sorted by disposition (reclass and
w/d, transfers)
withdrawals &transfers
reclass
manual
automated
automated
WORKFLOW ITEMS RECLASSED BY LC ISSUES
Material not on shelf (NOS)
• In circulation, lost/missing
Call number conversion
• Z class number/topical number conflict for bibliographies
Monographic series
• Classed together by local practice (vs. LC treatment)
Volume sets
• Split among locations with dual classification
Shelving problems
• Shifting and projecting space adequately
Student assistants
• Budgeting, hiring, training, tracking
Collection review
• Timely review by CM selectors, proper data format for communicating decisions, limit changes to project scope
Communication
• Collaboration with staff across divisional lines
RESOURCES
Human Resources
• Student Assistants• 412 hours at 26 items/hour (re-shelving process not included)
• Library staff time not included
Programming assistance
• Spreadsheet and related programs for automated functions provided by John Hein, Head of Technical Services, University of North Florida
• Locally developed software to facilitate label printing
Equipment
• Four laptops with barcode scanners
• High quality spine label printer
Supplies
• Brodart SuperBond labels
• Miscellaneous supplies, including color-coded book slips
RESULTS
Items reclassed
• Total reclassed: 10,789
Items transferred to other owning locations
• Total transferred: 2,308
Items withdrawn
• Total withdrawn: 1,191
Linear feet
• Main collection: 737.6 L.F.
• Transfers to branches: 164.08 L.F.
Total cost
• Physical processing cost: $ 2,408
• Student labor: $2,248
• Labels: $ 160
Unit cost: $0.23/item
• Indirect cost of staff time not included
CONCLUSIONS
Coordination is key
• Staff from Access Services, Technical Services, Public Services, Systems and Collection Management consult and coordinate workflow activities
Automated process
• Combination of NOTIS database, library computer network, laptop computers and Excel spreadsheets for quick and efficient process
Timely completion date
• Completion in six months (Oct. 2003-March 2004), prior to Aleph LMS implementation, April 2004