ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

download ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

of 6

Transcript of ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

  • 8/10/2019 ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

    1/6

    www.scholarsresearchlibrary.comtAvailable online a

    Scholars Research Library

    Annals of Biological Research, 2014, 5 (3):67-72

    (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html) ISSN 0976-1233

    CODEN (USA): ABRNBW

    67

    Scholars Research Library

    Edward syndrome (Trisomy 18): A case report

    Ezhil Arasi Nagamuthu and Neelala Neelaveni

    Department of Pathology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India_____________________________________________________________________________________________

    ABSTRACT

    The trisomy 18 syndrome (Edwards syndrome) is an autosomal chromosomal disorder due to the presence of an

    extra chromosome 18. The main clinical features include prenatal growth retardation, characteristic craniofacial

    features, distinctive hand posture, nail hypoplasia, short hallux, short sternum and major malformations of heart.

    One such case at 22-24 weeks of gestation was terminated and its case report was illustrated with the phenotypic

    features and fetal autopsy. The demonstration of an extra chromosome 18 on the karyotype added to the clinical

    diagnosis.

    Keywords: Trisomy 18; Edwards syndrome; Chromosomal disorder; Rockerbottom feet; Karyotype.

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________

    INTRODUCTION

    The Trisomy 18 syndrome (Edwards syndrome) is a common autosomal chromosomal disorder due to the presence

    of an extra chromosome 18. The first reported infants were described in 1960 by Edwards et al. and Smith et al.

    Trisomy 18 represents the second most common autosomal trisomy syndrome after trisomy 21 (Down syndrome).1, 2

    Karunakaran and Pai reported the first case in the Indian literature in 1967.3

    The syndrome pattern comprises a recognizable pattern of major and minor anomalies, an increased risk of neonatal

    and infant mortality, and significant psychomotor and cognitive disability. The main clinical features represent the

    clues for the diagnosis in the perinatal period and include prenatal growth retardation, characteristic craniofacial

    features, distinctive hand posture (overriding fingers), nail hypoplasia, short hallux, short sternum. Internal

    anomalies, particularly involving heart are common. The demonstration of an extra chromosome 18, or less

    commonly a partial trisomy of the long arm of chromosome 18, on the standard G-banded karyotype allows for

    confirmation of the clinical diagnosis. [1, 2]

    A 23 years old Primi gravida with gestational age of 22-24 weeks reported at Modern Government Maternity

    Hospital/ Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh, India.. The ultrasound scanning showed

    ventriculomegaly, absent corpus callosum, rockerbottom feet. In view of multiple congenital anomalies, the couple

    decided to undergo termination of pregnancy. Later, the foetus was sent for autopsy.

    On external examination, the foetus showed prominent occiput, lumbar meningocele (Fig. 1), hypertelorism, low set

    fawn like ears (Fig. 2), rockerbottom feet (Fig. 3), clenched hands with overlapping fingers (Fig. 4).

  • 8/10/2019 ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

    2/6

    Ezhil Arasi Nagamuthu and N

    ________________________

    After autopsy, the organs were fix

    were given for tissue processinghaematoxylin and eosin.

    elala Neelaveni Annals of Biological Rese

    ___________________________________

    Scholars Research Library

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    d in 10%formalin for processing. After gross analy

    .Sections were processed routinely with paraffin e

    Figure 1: Prominent Occiput & Lumbar meningocele

    Figure 2: Hypertelorism & Low set fawn like ears

    arch, 2014, 5 (3):67-72__________________

    68

    sis representative sections

    bedding and stained with

  • 8/10/2019 ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

    3/6

    Ezhil Arasi Nagamuthu and N

    ________________________ elala Neelaveni Annals of Biological Rese

    ___________________________________

    Scholars Research Library

    Figure 3: Rockerbottom feet

    Figure 4: Clenched hands with overlapping fingers

    arch, 2014, 5 (3):67-72__________________

    69

  • 8/10/2019 ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

    4/6

    Ezhil Arasi Nagamuthu and N

    ________________________

    elala Neelaveni Annals of Biological Rese

    ___________________________________

    Scholars Research Library

    Figure 5: Agenesis of right kidney

    Fig. 6: Sections of left kidney

    arch, 2014, 5 (3):67-72__________________

    70

  • 8/10/2019 ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

    5/6

    Ezhil Arasi Nagamuthu and N

    ________________________

    The histopathological examination

    tubules.

    The cytogenetic work up was done

    The diagnosis of Trisomy 18 (Ed

    low set fawn like pointed ears, clen

    of ventriculomegaly, absent corpus

    Trisomy 18 is a chromosomal diso

    organ malformations. Trisomy 18 i

    The live birth prevalence of trisom

    1 in 6,000.2,4

    The prevalence at birt

    It is well known that trisomy 18 pr

    are made in the prenatal period b

    amniocentesis, or detection of so

    pregnancy termination in a significa

    Genetic counseling: When prenatal

    be realistic, but not desolate. The p

    but they have to be prepared for bo

    family with a child with complete tr

    The available literature and our e

    confirm clinical diagnosis and to ex

    It helps to identify unexpected anofamily planning, genetic counsellin

    elala Neelaveni Annals of Biological Rese

    ___________________________________

    Scholars Research Library

    of the sections of the left kidney show normal dev

    Fig. 7: Cytogenetic map

    o identify the chromosomal aberration. It showed tris

    ard syndrome) was based on the findings of hyperte

    ched hands with overlapping fingers, rocker bottom f

    callosum. The cytogenetic karyotype of trisomy 18 co

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    rder resulting in a syndrome characterized by specifi

    s also called as Edward Syndrome or Trisomy E.

    18 ranges from 1/3600 to 1/10,000 with the best ove

    h is higher in females compared to males (F:M %, 60.

    egnancies have a high risk of fetal loss and stillbirth

    ased on screening by maternal age or maternal se

    nographic abnormalities during the second and th

    nt percentage of cases.1,2,5

    or neonatal diagnosis of trisomy 18 is made, the coun

    rents can find it difficult to accept the lack of certain

    h the probability of death and the possibility of livin

    isomy 18 is usually stated as 1%.2

    CONCLUSION

    perience support the fact that careful pathological

    plain the cause of intrauterine fetal demise.

    alies that may provide further clues to a diagnosticg for future pregnancies.

    arch, 2014, 5 (3):67-72__________________

    71

    lopment of glomeruli and

    my 18.

    lorism, prominent occiput,

    ot and ultrasound findings

    nfirmed the diagnosis.

    c dysmorphic features and

    all estimate in livebirths as

    4).2,5

    . Currently most diagnoses

    um marker screening and

    ird trimester followed by

    seling of the family should

    y of the newborn situation,

    . The recurrence risk, for a

    examination of foetus can

    yndrome and also assist in

  • 8/10/2019 ABR-2014-5-3-67-72.pdf

    6/6

    Ezhil Arasi Nagamuthu and Neelala Neelaveni Annals of Biological Research, 2014, 5 (3):67-72______________________________________________________________________________

    72

    Scholars Research Library

    REFERENCES

    [1]Carey JC: Trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 syndromes. In Management of genetic syndromes. 3rd edition. Edited by

    Cassidy SB, Allanson JE. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2010:807823.[2]Cereda A, Carey JC: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases20127:81.

    [3]Bharucha BA, Agarwal UM, Savliwala AS, Kolluri RR, Kumta NB.J Postgrad Med1983;29:129-32.

    [4]Taylor AI.:J. Med. Genet., 5: 227-252, 1968.

    [5]Rosa RF, Rosa RC, Zen PR, Graziadio C, Paskulin GA.Rev Paul Pediatr2013;31(1):111-20.