About your research methodology grounded theory. rica viljoen. eskom
-
Upload
dr-rica-viljoen -
Category
Leadership & Management
-
view
84 -
download
5
Transcript of About your research methodology grounded theory. rica viljoen. eskom
About your research methodology – a Grounded Theory methodological approach
Dr Rica Viljoen
Presentation at Da Vinci Eskom Research Conference
2014
On Research
“A journey begins before the travellers depart. So, too, our Grounded Theory adventure begins as we seek
information about what a grounded journey entails and what to expect along the way.”
Charmaz, 2006: 1
“Theory derived from data is more likely to resemble the ‘reality’ than is theory derived by putting together a series of concepts based on experience or solely through speculation (how one thinks things ought to work). Grounded theories, because they are drawn from data, are likely to offer insight, enhance understanding, and provide a meaningful guide to
action.”
Strauss & Corbin, 1998, p.12
Grounded Theory (GT)
History of GTDeveloped in the School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco by sociologists Glaser and Strauss – Awareness
of Dying
Influenced by Symbolic Interactionism (Blumer 1969: 2)
-‐ Human beings act towards things on the basis of the meanings that these things have for them;-‐ The meaning of such things is derived from, and arises out of, the social interaction that one has with one’s fellows;-‐ These meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretive process used by the person in dealing with the thing he encounters.
History of GT1960’s move from natural science as the foundation of social research – new ways of investigating the social world
• Denzin and Lincoln’s – Modernist moment• Realist ontology• Epistemology–objective truths, generalisable, testable and verifiable
theory• Place of the researched and the researcher – ‘discovery of theory’• The move in social science towards postmodernism and post-‐
structuralism has resulted in GT being attacked for its objectivist and positivist foundations.
• In later works Glaser and Strauss, take on the language associated with interpretivism -‐ change in foundation
• Now mostly associated with a post-‐modernistic or social constructivist ontology and an interprevistic epistemology
Definitions‘To generate or discover a theory’
(Glaser and Strauss, 1967)
‘The discovery of theory from data systematically obtained from social research’
(Glaser and Strauss 1967: 2)
‘Systemic approach towards finding themes that emerge from data, grounded in theory’
(Viljoen, 2012)
Different approaches
• Glaser– (1998) emergence of themes
• Corbin and Strauss (1990)– Systemic approach create validity
• Viljoen– Incorporate design theory (Ackoff and Strumpher) with social systems theory (Senge) in data-‐analysis phase
Features of Grounded Theory Charmaz (1995, 2002):
• Simultaneous collection and analysis of data• Creation of analytic codes and categories developed from
data and not by pre-‐existing conceptualisations (theoretical sensitivity)
• Discovery of basic social processes in the data• Inductive construction of abstract categories• Theoretical sampling to refine categories• Writing analytical memos as the stage between coding and
writing• The integration of categories into a theoretical framework.
Data Collection
‘all is data’
• In-‐depth interviews• – Most commonly used – Relies on open ended questions – Questions can be modified to reflect emerging theory
• Observational methods• Focus Group – Can be used• 8-‐18 voices – often narrative
Bottom linedriven
Silo Mentality
Effectiveness ofLeadership
Clear Vision
Integration
SatisfiedPeople
Collaboration
Availabilityof skills (EXT)
Innovation
Sustainability
Strategy
KnowledgeManagement
PeopleManagement
Communication
LegislationOrganisational
Structure
PeopleCompetencies
Globalisation
Technology
How to conduct Quality Research• Charmaz (2006: 182) :
– credibility– originality– resonance– usefulness
• Glasier (2001,2003) : – Fit has to do with how closely concepts fit with the incidents they are
representing, and this is related to how thoroughly the constant comparison of incidents to concepts was done.
– Relevance: A relevant study deals with the real concern of participants, evokes "grab" (captures the attention) and is not only of academic interest.
– Workability: The theory works when it explains how the problem is being solved with much variation.
– Modifiability: A modifiable theory can be altered when new relevant data
References• Charmaz, K. & Bryant, A., 2010. Grounded Theory. In International Encyclopedia ofEducation.
Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 406–412. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B735N-‐502X2YTSX/ 2/e31754873a8f8fb35be74b6c26ae5231 [Accessed October 26, 2010].
• Charmaz, Kathy, 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis 1st ed., Sage Publications Ltd.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K.R.B., 2000. Research methods in education, Routledge.• Corbin, J. & Strauss, A., 1990. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canoncs and Evaluative
Criteria. Zeitschrift fur Soziologie, 19(7), pp.418–427.• Goulding, C., 2002. Grounded theory: a practical guide for management, business and market
researchers, SAGE.• Guba, E.G., 1981. ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper: Criteria for Assessing the• Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries. Educational Communication and• Technology: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development, 29(2), pp.75–91.• Guest, G. & MacQueen, K.M., 2008. Handbook for team-‐based qualitative research,Rowman
Altamira• Shannak, R.O. & Aldhmour, F.M., 2009. Grounded Theory as a Methodology for Theory Generation
in Information Systems Research. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 15.
• Shenton, A.K., 2004. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), pp.63–76.