About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

56
About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discussion paper. Derpsch R. Friedrich T. Landers JN. Rainbow R. Reicosky DC. Sá JCM. Sturny WG. Wall P. Ward RC. Weiss K. 5 th WCCA Brisbane, 26. – 29.09.2011 Corresponding Author: Rolf Derpsch, [email protected]

description

Presentation from the WCCA 2011 conference in Brisbane, Australia.

Transcript of About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Page 1: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

About the necessity of adequately defining no-

tillage - a discussion paper.

Derpsch R. Friedrich T. Landers JN. Rainbow R. Reicosky DC. Sá JCM.

Sturny WG. Wall P. Ward RC. Weiss K.

5th WCCA Brisbane, 26. – 29.09.2011

Corresponding Author: Rolf Derpsch, [email protected]

Page 2: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Introduction

What is no-till farming?

This seems to be a simple question, but 50 years after its introduction in practical farming neither the scientific community, nor teaching institutions, nor the farming industry have yet agreed on a clear definition of this crop production system.

Page 3: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

The key principles on which no-tillage is based are the same that

have been defined by FAO (2011) to characterize Conservation Agriculture

and are in this case rigorously implemented.

- Minimum soil disturbance- Permanent organic soil cover- Crop rotation/association

Page 4: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

The rigorous application of these principles in the no-tillage system implies that the additions of crop

residues to the system must be at least greater than the output due to

oxidation processes of organic matter.

Page 5: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

No-tillage, zero tillage and no-till

are used as synonymous by the

authors of this paper.

Page 6: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Often no-tillage is defined as a production system with minimum

soil disturbance.

Minimum has to be very well defined if misunderstandings are to be avoided.

Page 7: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Common definition of no-till

Soil is left undisturbed from harvest through planting.

Page 8: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Not tilling the soil

Crop rotationCover crops

Permanent soil cover

SustainableAgriculture

(Derpsch, 2001)

No-tillage is a holistic cropping system

Cropping Cropping DiversityDiversity

Page 9: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

It is very important to formulate a science based and explicit definition of the no-

tillage system if consistent and comparable results are to be achieved in

the research community

No-tillage.

Page 10: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Some people in this conference believe that there is no need to discuss this

theme as the term Conservation Agriculture, which is well defined, is

used today instead of no-tillage by many organizations.

And there is no objection to that! Conservation Agriculture is indeed the

preferred term for many institutions.

Page 11: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Is the term NO-TILLAGE then superfluous?

Can we just use the term Conservation Agriculture and forget the word

NO-TILLAGE?

Probably not.

Can the term Conservation Agriculture be used as synonymous

to NO-TILLAGE?

Page 12: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

How about naming a research treatment in an experiment like this?

Conservation Agriculture compared to

Conventional Tillage and

Reduced Tillage?

Is that realistic?

Page 13: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

The question is if we can use the term CA when we are taking about research treatments in scientific investigations.

To make it clear, what the authors of this paper are discussing is the

adequate use of the term no-tillage

a) in scientific research and

b) other general uses.

Page 14: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

When talking about equipment we most likely will continue to call it no-tillage

seeding machine and not Conservation Agriculture seeding machine.

When taking about experiment treatments we probably want to call it

no-tillage treatment and not Conservation Agriculture treatment.

Anyhow, manufacturers will most probably continue to call it no-till seeding equipment!

Page 15: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Our problem is that there is a very broad interpretation and

understanding of what no-tillage is and how it should be

performed.

Page 16: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Although almost everyone understands that no-tillage farming is agriculture

without tillage, this is not precise enough when it comes to define a system with

the aim of having COMPARABLE RESEARCH RESULTS.

Page 17: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

All too often apples are not compared to apples

Apples Apples

Page 18: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Instead they are compared to oranges

Apples Oranges

Page 19: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

or to pears

Page 20: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Contrasting and contradicting research results are the

consequence!.For example: some researchers assert that

no-tillage does not sequester carbon in the soil

(e.g.John Baker, et al 2007; Max Plank Institute at Müncheberg, Germany 2007),

while other authors contend that no-tillage does sequester carbon in the soil.

(e.g. Lal, et al., 1998; Reicosky, 1997; Sá, et al., 2009)

Page 21: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

All too often

conflicting and contradicting no-tillage research results are solely and

exclusively the result of using local jargon, different definitions, dissimilar

practices or dissimilar seeding equipment by different researchers.

Page 22: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Can this be called No-tillage?

Fact is that many people do!

Page 23: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Soil surface disturbance following low disturbance (double-disc opener) and high disturbance (knife/rigid

shank/hoe type openers) drills, planting into wheat stubble.

Low carbon and water loss. >Tillage-induced carbon and water loss

(Reicosky, 2004)

Page 24: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

(Reicosky, 2004)

Page 25: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

(Reicosky, 2004)

Page 26: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

CO2 & H2O loss from Low vs High Disturbance Drills

0.38 0.35

3.01

0

1

2

3

4

5

None Low High

Disturbance Type

CO

2 lo

ss (

gC

O2/m

2/h

)

CO2 loss

Evaporation

00

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Evap

ora

tio

n (

mm

/h)

0.70

0.1

7

0.35

(Reicosky, 2004)

Carbon and water loss from low versus high disturbance drills

Page 27: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Another issue is soil cover.

A no-tillage system where crop residues from the previous crop have been

removed, burned or eaten by livestock will result in lower yields compared to no-

tillage with full retention of crop residues

(Wall, 1999, Sayre et al., 2006).

We know that almost all advantages of the no-tillage system come from the

permanent cover of the soil and retaining all residues.

Page 28: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Seeding systems that till and mix more than 50% of the soil surface while

seeding cannot be defined as no-tillage (Linke, 1998, Sturny et al., 2007).

If the whole machine width of soil is disturbed even superficially, then the system is defined as Mulch Tillage

(CTIC 2011)

Page 29: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Also a problem is that all too often researchers are not accurate in

describing in materials and methods how they have carried out their no-

tillage research.

The absence of an adequate definition and the inaccuracy in describing how

no-tillage research was performed leads to a situation where research results can

become virtually meaningless.

Page 30: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

A problem in defining no-tillage is that it is virtually impossible to define it in one sentence. Instead the system has to be described in detail because it is

a complex system with many components.

The description needs to include all the important concepts that

characterize the no-till system.

Page 31: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Description of some of the implicit concepts

Seeding directly into untilled soil.

Using specialized low disturbance seeding equipment.

Retaining crop residues on the soil surface as mulch.

Opening a narrow slot into the residue covered soil which is only wide enough to put the seeds into the soil at proper depth and cover them with soil.

Page 32: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Description - some of the implicit concepts

Performing integrated weed control including crop rotation and aggressive cover crops or associations and applying appropriate herbicides.

Aiming at a balanced nutrient & pH status in the soil trough adequate nutrient management.

Applying an integrated pest management strategy.

Using the concept of permanence and continuity.

Addition of crop residues must be > output (oxidation)

Description of some of the implicit concepts

Performing integrated weed control including crop rotation and aggressive cover crops or associations and applying appropriate herbicides.

Aiming at a balanced nutrient & pH status in the soil trough adequate nutrient management.

Applying an integrated pest management strategy.

Using the concept of permanence and continuity.

Addition of crop residues must be > output (oxidation)

Page 33: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

In summary:

No-tillage or zero tillage is a conservation farming system in which the seeds are deposited into untilled soil that has retained the crop residues from the previous crop by opening a narrow slot, trench or hole only of sufficient width and depth to obtain proper seed coverage. No other soil tillage is done.

All aspects of the description of the no-tillage system undertaken in our paper are considered to be implicit in this definition.

Page 34: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

No-tillage is being adopted on more than 170 Million ha worldwide and on > 70% of arable cropland by countries like Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, Australia and New Zealand (Derpsch et al., 2010).

But unfortunately there is no uniform

understanding about this technology.

Page 35: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

No-tillageis an increasingly popular production system that deserves an adequate

international definition to be agreed on in order to avoid conflicting and

contradicting RESEARCH results in future!

Page 36: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

No-till is the only farming technology known today that fully meets the

requirements of a sustainable agricultural production even under extreme soil and

climate conditions.

Page 37: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

A reminder to researchers:

The common praxis of using laconic sentences in materials and methods of

publications as for instance: “The experiment included three tillage treatments,

conventional, minimum and no-tillage” or not describing in detail how the experiment and no-tillage was carried out needs to come to

an end and to be energetically rejected.

Page 38: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

If a researcher insists in using his own definition of no-tillage he may of course do that, but he should describe in DETAIL in

materials and methods how he has carried out the experiment!!!

Unfortunately this is seldom the case

Page 39: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Conclusions

If among researchers a consensus for an accurate description and definition

of no-tillage can not be achieved soon, then we will continue to

“flounder” and have conflicting and contradicting research results about

no-tillage at the national and the international level.

Page 40: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

In other words,unless the scientific community agrees

on an internationally recognized definition of no-tillage conflicting and

contradicting research results will continue to fill the literature on tillage /

no-tillage research.

Page 41: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discussion paper.

Derpsch R. Friedrich T. Landers JN. Rainbow R. Reicosky DC. Sá JCM.

Sturny WG. Wall P. Ward RC. Weiss K.

Corresponding Author: Rolf Derpsch, [email protected]

Thank you for your attention.Thank you for your attention.

Page 42: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch
Page 43: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Alternative definitions

Swiss no-till

Swiss Soil Conservation Association

http://www.no-till.ch/

Page 44: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Definition of a no-tillage system (1)(Swiss No-till, Wolfgang Sturny)

NO-TILLAGE is a cropping system, in which seed is placed directly into an untilled soil covered by plants or plant residues – without any previous soil cultivation.

By means of special openers such as a disc, hoe or cross slot just a slot is opened in the soil and closed instantaneously after seed placement. No more than 50% of the soil surface is being disturbed during the direct seeding operation. Fertilizer can be placed in the soil at the same time.

Page 45: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

The success of a continuous no-tillage system is comparable to continuous grassland with durable renouncement of soil movement, permanent soil cover, reduced mechanical soil stress as well as enhanced water conservation, nitrogen and energy efficiency.

Definition of a no-tillage system (2)(Swiss No-till, Wolfgang Sturny)

Page 46: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Alternative definitions

University of Nebraska

http://cropwatch.unl.edu/web/tillage/notillman

Page 47: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

No-till uses a systems approach to crop production where crops are grown with minimal soil disturbance and the soil is kept covered with crop residue to conserve soil and water. Continuous no-till and crop rotation, intensity, and diversity are keys to making no-till successful, building the soil system while minimizing potential problems. Too often, producers think that no-till is planting a crop one year without doing tillage. No, it’s continuously planting crops, every year, without tillage to get the full benefits of no-till. Residue management, crop rotation, nutrient management, integrated pest management, equipment and its proper operation, and many other cropping practices must be part of the systems approach. When no-till is properly managed, the soil structure and its biological life will improve; runoff, erosion, fuel, and labor will decrease; and infiltration, productivity, and profitability will increase. Without the systems approach, planting a crop without tillage will have problems and the producer will likely fail, blaming no-till, not the lack of management.

Page 48: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch
Page 49: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Description and definition of the no-tillage concept

If needed to be read during the discussion

3 PPT pages, 582 Words 5 – 6 minutes reading time

Page 50: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

Description and definition of the no-tillage concept

No-tillage or zero tillage is a conservation farming system in which the seeds are placed at proper depth directly into untilled soil that has retained the previous crop or cover crop residues. It is also referred to as no-till. It is considered to be the important element in Conservation Agriculture. Special no-till seeding equipment with discs (low disturbance) or narrow tines/coulters (higher disturbance) open a narrow slot into the residue-covered soil which is only wide enough to put the seeds into the soil at proper depth and cover them with soil. The aim is to move as little soil as possible in order to preserve the surface residues and to reduce potential weed seeds from reaching the soil surface to germinate. No other soil tillage operation is done. The residues from the previous crops will remain largely undisturbed at the soil surface as mulch. Seeding systems that till and mix more than 50% of the soil surface while seeding cannot be defined as no-tillage (Linke, 1998, Sturny et al., 2007). If the whole machine width of soil is disturbed even superficially, then according to CTIC (2011), the system is defined as mulch tillage.

Page 51: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

A successful no-tillage system has to have adequate weed control. Weed control in no-tillage is performed through the adoption of appropriate crop rotations including the use of adapted, aggressive species of cover crops or crop associations, mechanical non soil engaging tools like the knife roller and also by applying appropriate herbicides. Adequate nutrient management, including replacement of nutrients exported by crops that are in short supply in the soil and integrated pest management are parts of the system. Some of the environmentally-relevant effects of no-tillage, such as erosion control, improvement of water quality, increased water infiltration (leading also to reduced flood hazard and greater dry season flows), climate related consequences (through carbon sequestration in the soil and lower emissions of other GHGs), will become important only after several years of continuous, uninterrupted practice, generating substantial off-farm benefits for society (Landers et al., 2001). Returning enough plant biomass to the system year by year is a condition for all these environmental benefits to become effective.

Page 52: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

The success of no-tillage as a conservation production system, embraced by Conservation Agriculture, is based on its continuous, permanent usage, similar to a permanent pasture (Sturny et al., 2007) and on direct biological diversification through crop rotation and cover crops associated with non disturbance of soil. Indirect diversification also occurs especially in the soil micro- and meso-biota, but also in the surface fauna, such as birds and mammals. The system mimics nature where soil loosening is performed by roots of plants and soil fauna as well as by diversified biological activity. Special requirements of the system must be satisfied to avoid failures and the necessary steps towards a successful transition to no-till need to be followed (Duiker and Myres, 2006, Derpsch, 2008). The fact that the soil is not tilled and remains permanently covered with crop residues leads to reduced soil erosion, to soil sequestration of atmospheric carbon, to increased biological activity in the soil, to better conservation of water, to better efficiency of applied nutrients and increased nutrient availability from biological activity, to improved energy efficiency (Sturny et al., 2007) and to higher economic returns through time (Derpsch et al., 2010). Moreover, no-till is the only farming system known today that fully meets the requirements of a sustainable agricultural production even under extreme soil and climate conditions.

Page 53: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

No-tillage is the specific technology that makes

Conservation Agriculture possible!

Page 54: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

A minimum of items to be recorded and to be mentioned in materials and methods when doing

tillage / no-tillage research are: Percentage of soil surface covered with residues after

seeding. Percentage of the soil surface that has been disturbed while seeding Crop sequences and/or rotations that have been used Herbicides and rates that have been used for weed control Brand name and model of no-tillage seeding equipment used Configuration of the furrow opener and closing devices of the seeder Additional N applications for no-tillage in the initial phase Counting of number of plants germinated per m2 in each

treatment Weed development and weed control in each treatment Pest and diseases development and control.

Page 55: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

(Reicosky, 2004)

Page 56: About the necessity of adequately defining no-tillage - a discusssion paper. Rolf Derpsch

(Reicosky, 2004)