ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS
description
Transcript of ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS
![Page 1: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Gerard ’t Hooft, quant-ph/0604008
Erice, September 6, 2006
Utrecht University
1
![Page 2: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivations for believing in a deterministic theory:
0. Religion1. “Quantum cosmology”2. Locality in General Relativity and String Theory3. Evidence from the Standard Model (admittedly weak).4. It can be done.
“Collapse of wave function” makes no sense QM for a closed, finite space-time makes no senseString theory only obeys locality principles in perturbationexpansion. But only on-shell wave functions can be defined. In the S.M., local gauge invariance may point towards the existence of equivalence classes (see later in lecture)The math of QM appears to allow for a deterministic interpretation, if only some “small, technical” problemscould be overcome.
A few of my slides shown at the beginning of the lecture were accidentally erased. Here is a summary:
2
![Page 3: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
![Page 4: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1. Any live cell with fewer than two neighbours dies, as if by loneliness.
2. Any live cell with more than three neighbours dies, as if by overcrowding.
3. Any live cell with two or three neighbours lives, unchanged, to the next generation.
4. Any dead cell with exactly three neighbours comes to life.
4
![Page 5: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The use of Hilbert Space Techniques as technical
devices for the treatment of the statistics of chaos ...
, ... , , ..., , ..., , anything ... x p i
í ýA “state” of the universe:
A simple model universe: í 1ý í 2ý í 3ý í 1ý
Diagonalize:
0 0 1
1 0 0
0 1 0
U2 2 2
1 2 3, , P P P
;321
iH
i
i e
e
eU
3/2
3/2
1
23
23
0
5
![Page 6: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ˆbut 0H ??
Emergent quantum mechanics in a deterministic system
†ˆ ˆ 2 Im( ) 0H H i f g
( ) ( )d
x t f xdt
ˆ
ˆˆ ( ) ( )
p ix
H p f x g x
ˆ( ) ( ) , ( )
dx t i x t H f x
dt
ThePOSITIVITY
Problem
5a
![Page 7: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
In any periodic system, the Hamiltoniancan be written as
2;H p
T
21 ; 0, 1, 2, ...iHT n
e H n nT
0
54321
-1-2-3-4-5
This is the spectrum of aharmonic oscillator !!
6
![Page 8: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Lock-in mechanism
In search for a
7
![Page 9: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
8
Lock-in mechanism
![Page 10: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
A key ingredient for an ontological theory: Information loss
Introduce equivalence classes
{1},{4} {2} {3}
9
![Page 11: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
With (virtual) black holes, information loss will be very large! →
Large equivalence classes !
10
![Page 12: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
bras
LL1LL2LL3
ketsConsider a periodic variable:
; [0, 2 ]
d
dt
, 0, 1, 2,
zH p i L
m m
0123
The quantum harmonic oscillator hasonly:
, 0, 1, 2,H n m
Beable
Changeable
11
![Page 13: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Interactions can take place in two ways.Consider two (or more) periodic variables.1:
int( );ii i i i i
dqq f q H f p
dt
Do perturbation theory in the usual way bycomputing .intn H m
This and the nect 2 slides were not shown during the lecture but may be instructive:
12
![Page 14: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1 1 12 2 2 ( 1)1; ; ;x xi i i
x x xe i e i e
intH
1q
2q2: Write for the
hopping operator.
0 1
1 0x
1 1 1(0)q q t
1 1 2 2 1 2( 1) ( ) ( )xH p p A q a q
Use
to derive 2
12
112
2
1
1exp exp ( )( 1)
if( ) 1
( )t
xt
x
i H dt i A q
A
q
a
13
![Page 15: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
But this leads to decoherence !
However, in both cases,
will take values over the entire range of valuesfor n and m .
intn H m
Positive and negative values for n and mare mixed !
→ negative energy states cannot be projected out !
intn H m
But it can “nearly” be done! suppose we take many slits, and average: Then we can choose to have the desired Fourier coefficientsfor
2 2( ) ( )q f q
14
![Page 16: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Consider two non - interacting systems:
1E
2E 1 2E E
1 1 2 2H n n 15
![Page 17: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The allowed states have “kets ” with
1 11 2 1 1 2 2 1,22 2( ) ( ) , 0H E E n n n
and “bras ” with
1 11 2 1 1 2 2 1,22 2( ) ( ) , 1H E E n n n
1 2 1 2 1 20 | | | |E E E E E E
12E t
11 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 22 ( )( ) ( )( )E t E t E E t t E E t t
Now, and
So we also have: 1 2 1 2( ) ( )t t t t 16
![Page 18: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The combined system is expected again to behave asa periodic unit, so, its energy spectrum must be some combination of series of integers:
1 2E E
0
5
4
3
2
1
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
11 1 2 22( )nE n p p
For everythat are odd andrelative primes, wehave a series:
1 2,p p
17
![Page 19: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
11 1 2 22( )nE n p p
11
2
T
22
2
T
1 25, 3p p The case
121 1 2 2
2T
p p
This is the periodicity of the equivalence class:
1 1 2 2 nst odC (M 2 )p x p x
1x
2x
22
18
![Page 20: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
A key ingredient for an ontological theory: Information loss
Introduce equivalence classes
í 1ý,í 4ý í 2ý í 3ý19
![Page 21: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
With (virtual) black holes, information loss will be very large! →
Large equivalence classes !20
![Page 22: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
1x
2x
1
2
This is one equivalence class
Note that is nowequivalent with
1 1 od2 ( / ) (M 2 )x k p
1x
and are beables(ontological quantities), to be determined by interactions with other variables.
1p 2p
Therefore, we should work with and instead of and1 1 1/y x p 2 2 2/y x p 1x 2x
In terms of these new variables, we have 1 2 1p p
21
![Page 23: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Some important conclusions:
An isolated system will have equivalence classes that show periodic motion; the period ω will be a “beable”.
The Hamiltonian will be H = (n +½) ω , where n is a changeable:it generates the evolution.However, in combination with other systems, n plays the role ofidentifying how many of the states are catapulted into one equivalence class: 1 1 2 /(2 1)x x n If all states are assumed to be non-equivalent, then n = 0 .The Hamiltonian for the combined system 1 and 2 is then
1212 12 1 2( ) ( )H n
The ω are all beables, so there is no problem keeping them all positive. The only changeable in the Hamiltonian is the number n for the entire universe, which may be positive (kets)or negative (bras)
This is how the Hamiltonian “locks in” with a beable !Positivity problem solved. 2
2
![Page 24: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
1. In the energy eigenstates, the equivalence classes coincidewith the points of constant phaseof the wave function.
Limit cycles
We now turn this around. Assume that our deterministic system will eventually end in a limit cyclewith period . Then is the energy (already long before the limit cycle was reached).
2 /TT
If is indeed the period of the equivalence class, then this must also be the period of the limit cycle of the system !
1 1 2 22 /( )T p p
The phase of the wave function tells us where in the limit cycle we will be.
23
![Page 25: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
12( ) iH n
Since only the overall n variable is a changeable, whereas therest of the Hamiltonian, , are beables, our theory willallow to couple the Hamiltonian to gravity such that thegravitational field is a beable.
i
(Note, however, that momentum is still a changeable, and it couples to gravity at higher orders in 1/c )
Gauge theories
Gravity
The equivalence classes have so much in common with thegauge orbits in a local gauge theory, that one might suspectthese actually to be the same, in many cases ( → Future speculation)
24
![Page 26: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
General conclusions
At the Planck scale, Quantum Mechanics is not wrong, but its interpretation may have to be revised, not only for philosophical reasons, but to enable us to construct more concise theories, recovering e.g. locality (which appears to have been lost in string theory).
The “random numbers”, inherent in the usual statistical interpretation of the wave functions, may well find their origins at the Planck scale, so that, there, we have an ontological (deterministic) mechanics
For this to work, this deterministic system must feature information loss at a vast scale.
We still have a problem: how to realize the information loss process before the interactions are switched on ! 2
5
![Page 27: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Claim: Quantum mechanics is exact, yet the Classical World exists !!
The equations of motion of the (classical and [sub-]atomic) world are deterministic, but involve Planck-scale variables.
The conventional classical e.o.m. are (of course)inaccurate.
Quantum mechanics as we know it, only refers to the low-energy domain, where the fast-oscillating Planckian variables have been averaged over.
Atoms and electrons are not “real” 26
This and the next slide were not shown during lecture
![Page 28: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
At the Planck scale, we presume that alllaws of physics, describing the evolution.refer to beables only.
Going from the Planck scale to the atomicscale, we mix the bables with changeables;beables and changeables become indistinguisable !!
MACROSCOPIC variables, such as thepositions of planets, are probably againbeables. They are ontological !
Atomic observables are not, in general, beables.
27
![Page 29: ABOUT QUANTUM MECHANICS](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022012914/568148e2550346895db5fead/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The End
G. ’t HooftA mathematical theory for
deterministic quantum mechanics
28