ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
-
Upload
beatrix-french -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
0
Transcript of ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs
in the US
• Dr. Steven Frank, Program Coordinator
• Surveying Engineering
• New Mexico State University
• Las Cruces, NM 88003
OUTLINE
• Introduction
• ABET accreditation process– EAC accreditation criteria– ASAC accreditation criteria– TAC accreditation criteria– CAC accreditation criteria
• Choosing accreditation
• Summary and conclusions
Introduction
• Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)
• Used to accredit individual programs
• Separate from university accreditation
• 28 professional organizations
• 2,700 programs in 550 universities
• Constantly evolving criteria
ABET Accreditation Process
• Programs must have at least one graduate to apply for accreditation
• “Self-study” report written
• Site visit by ABET evaluators (academic and/or industrial)
• Each program accredited individually
• Institution also evaluated
ABET Accreditation Process
• Site visit– Normally 3 days (can be 2 days)– Evaluate
• Student transcripts• Student projects• Class rooms• Laboratories / equipment• Students / faculty
Accreditation process
• Four ABET commission– Engineering (EAC)– Applied Science (ASAC)– Technology (TAC)– Computing (CAC)
EAC Criteria
• Must have “Engineering” in program title• 7 general criteria
– 1) Students– 2) Educational objective– 3) Program outcomes– 4) Professional component– 5) Faculty– 6) Facilities– 7) Institutional support
EAC criteria
• Students– How are they evaluated on performance– How are they advised and monitored– Policies for transfer students– How is student success being tracked
EAC criteria
• Educational objectives– What graduates are expected to achieve 3-5
years after graduation– Measurements to show that objectives are or
are not being met– Improvement actions taken that are based
upon measurements
EAC criteria
• Program outcomes– What students are expected to be able to do
at time of graduation– System to measure, evaluate, update and
continuously improve outcomes– Based on ABET “a-k” criteria
EAC criteria
• ABET “a-k”– a) Ability to apply math, science and
engineering– b) Ability to design/conduct experiments– c) Ability to design– d) Ability to perform on multidisciplinary team– e) Ability to identify and solve problems– f) Understanding of ethics / responsibilities
EAC criteria
• ABET “a-k”– g) Ability to communicate effectively– h) Recognition for life-long learning– i) Knowledge of contemporary issues– j) Ability to use knowledge, skills, and modern
tools necessary for professional practice
EAC criteria
• Professional component– Amount of math / science courses– Amount of general education courses– Amount of engineering/surveying courses– Specific courses required by profession– Major design experience
EAC criteria
• Faculty– Must be sufficient in number to teach courses,
advise students, etc.– Must be qualified by experience or by
licensure– Should be involved in professional societies
EAC criteria
• Facilities– Classrooms– Laboratories– Equipment– Computers
EAC criteria
• Institutional support– Computer technicians– Library services– Students services– Faculty development
EAC criteria
• Programs accredited under EAC– CSU Fresno– Ferris State University– University of Maine– New Mexico State University– Ohio State University– Pennsylvania State University– Purdue University
ASAC criteria
• Essentially the same as EAC criteria
• No design requirements
• Professional component has different criteria for math / science
• Professional criterion for surveying the same as EAC
ASAC criteria
• Programs accredited under ASAC– University of Alaska– East Tennessee State University– University of Florida– Metropolitan State College of Denver– Michigan Tech– Oregon Institute of Technology– Southern Polytechnic State University– St. Cloud University– Texas A&M University
TAC criteria
• Similar to EAC & ASAC
• More emphasis on technical “hands-on” experience
• Program characteristics– Minimum of 124 semester credit hours– High emphasis on applied aspects (at least
1/3 of curriculum)– Faculty criteria are more lenient
TAC criteria
• Programs accredited under TAC (4 year)– University of Akron– Alfred State College– Idaho State University– New Jersey Institute of Technology
TAC criteria
• Program accredited under TAC (2 year)– University of Akron– Alfred State College– Mohawk Valley Community College– Paul Smith’s College– Pennsylvania Tech– Penn State
CAC criteria
• Most unique of ABET criteria
• Emphasizes computer science, learning and skills (40 credits computer science)
• Graduates must finish in a timely manner
• Exposure to multiple computer programming languages
• Access to different computing platforms
CAC criteria
• No surveying/geomatics programs accredited under CAC to date
• Speculation that GIS/LIS programs may become accredited under CAC
Choosing accreditation
• Curriculum content plays a factor– Math/science more heavily emphasized in
EAC, less in TAC
• More theory at EAC level, more practical at TAC level
• Faculty emphasis slightly different
Choosing accreditation
• Needs of constituents (employers of graduates, alumni, students, etc.)
• Student recruitment / retention
• Perceived value of degree
Choosing accreditation
• Accreditation is good for up to 6 years
• Programs may elect to change accreditation status
• Programs may have multiple accreditations
Choosing accreditation
• ABET accreditation is accepted by all state licensing boards, but accreditation status of a particular program may have an impact on which graduates may become licensed
Summary and conclusions
• ABET is accrediting agency for surveying/geomatics programs in the US
• Different ABET commissions have different program criteria
• Programs must decide if and how they wish to be accredited