AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics,...

12
Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819 Baton Rouge, LA 70819 Rendy D. Hunt Rendy D. Hunt Phone: 225-906-0761 Phone: 225-906-0761 Fax: 225-408-8175 Fax: 225-408-8175 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] NTPEP / Log Number: RECP (08-01)- 06 Product Identification: Greensolutions DNS-2 Description: Netting: Matrix/Fill: 100 % wheat straw Stitching: 6.67 oz/sq.yd. 14.8 lb/in @ % 30.1 9.5 lb/in @ % 28.8 272 mils 89.8 %/% 10.2 366 % Soil Loss Ratio* = 14.45 Soil Loss Ratio* = 11.53 Soil Loss Ratio* = 9.20 Shear: 0.69 psf for 30 min. Soil Loss = 196.7 g Shear: 1.26 psf for 30 min. Soil Loss = 446.7 g Shear: 1.82 psf for 30 min. Soil Loss = 1143.3 g 1.24 psf @ ½-in soil loss = 421% - TD ASTM D 6525 – Thickness August 2008 100% synthetic @ 2.0 in. transverse stitch spacing AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report Synthetic top and bottom nets each with 11 x 16 mm rectangular openings Double net straw temporary erosion control blanket. Index Test Index Test Index Test Parameters Index Test Index Test Test Results Test Result ASTM D 6475 - Mass per Unit Area Test Method - Description ASTM D 1117 & ECTC-TASC 00197 - Water Absorption ASTM D 6567 - Ground Cover / Light Penetration ASTM D 6818 – Ultimate Tensile Strength / Strain - * Soil Loss Ratio = Soil Loss Bare Soil / Soil Loss with RECP = 1 / C-Factor (Note: soil loss is based on regression analysis) 50 mm (2 in.) / hr for 30 min. ECTC Method 3 - Determination of Unvegetated RECP Ability to Protect Soil from Hydraulically-Induced Shear Stresses Under Bench-Scale Conditions ECTC Draft Method 4 - Determination of Temporary Degradable RECP Performance in Encouraging Seed Germination and Plant Growth ECTC Method 2 - Determination of Unvegetated RECP Ability to Protect Soil From Rain Splash and Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions 150 mm (6 in.) / hr for 30 min. % Improvement (increased biomass) 100 mm (4 in.) / hr for 30 min. Soil loss curve intercept = Top soil; Fescue (Kentucky 31); 21 day incubation; 27±2° & approximately 45±5% RH Manufacturer: Plant Name: Corporate Address: Plant Address: Plant Contact: City/State/Zip: City/State/Zip: Corporate Contact:

Transcript of AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics,...

Page 1: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc.

510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal LaneBaton Rouge, LA 70819 Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Rendy D. Hunt Rendy D. HuntPhone: 225-906-0761 Phone: 225-906-0761Fax: 225-408-8175 Fax: 225-408-8175E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]

NTPEP / Log Number: RECP (08-01)- 06

Product Identification: Greensolutions DNS-2

Description:

Netting:

Matrix/Fill: 100 % wheat straw

Stitching:

6.67 oz/sq.yd.14.8 lb/in @ % 30.19.5 lb/in @ % 28.8

272 mils89.8 % / % 10.2

366 %Soil Loss Ratio* = 14.45Soil Loss Ratio* = 11.53Soil Loss Ratio* = 9.20

Shear: 0.69 psf for 30 min. Soil Loss = 196.7 gShear: 1.26 psf for 30 min. Soil Loss = 446.7 gShear: 1.82 psf for 30 min. Soil Loss = 1143.3 g

1.24 psf @ ½-in soil loss

= 421%

- TDASTM D 6525 – Thickness

August 2008

100% synthetic @ 2.0 in. transverse stitchspacing

AASHTO NTPEPRolled Erosion Control Product (RECP)

Test Report

Synthetic top and bottom nets each with 11 x 16mm rectangular openings

Double net straw temporary erosion controlblanket.

Index Test

Index Test

Index Test

ParametersIndex Test

Index Test

Test ResultsTest Result

ASTM D 6475 - Mass per Unit AreaTest Method - Description

ASTM D 1117 & ECTC-TASC 00197 - Water AbsorptionASTM D 6567 - Ground Cover / Light Penetration

ASTM D 6818 – Ultimate Tensile Strength / Strain -

* Soil Loss Ratio = Soil Loss Bare Soil / Soil Loss with RECP = 1 / C-Factor (Note: soil loss is based on regression analysis)

50 mm (2 in.) / hr for 30 min.

ECTC Method 3 - Determination of Unvegetated RECPAbility to Protect Soil from Hydraulically-Induced ShearStresses Under Bench-Scale Conditions

ECTC Draft Method 4 - Determination of TemporaryDegradable RECP Performance in Encouraging SeedGermination and Plant Growth

ECTC Method 2 - Determination of Unvegetated RECPAbility to Protect Soil From Rain Splash and AssociatedRunoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions 150 mm (6 in.) / hr for 30 min.

% Improvement

(increased biomass)

100 mm (4 in.) / hr for 30 min.

Soil loss curve intercept =Top soil; Fescue (Kentucky 31);

21 day incubation; 27±2° &approximately 45±5% RH

Manufacturer: Plant Name:

Corporate Address: Plant Address:

Plant Contact:

City/State/Zip:City/State/Zip:

Corporate Contact:

Page 2: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT TEST RESULTSClient: NTPEP

Material: Material: Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP)Manufacturer: Industrial Fabrics, Inc.Sample ID: Greensolutions DNS-2TRI Log #: E2280-13-10

STD.PARAMETER TEST REPLICATE NUMBER MEAN DEV.

Tensile Properties 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10(ASTM D 6818)

MD - Maximum Load (lb/in) 16.4 13.0 19.2 12.6 12.8 14.8 2.9TD - Maximum Load (lb/in) 10.2 9.1 9.0 9.8 9.6 9.5 0.5

MD - Elongation @ Max. Load (%) 32.0 30.0 35.3 23.3 30.0 30.1 4.4TD - Elongation @ Max. Load (%) 34.7 32.0 24.0 26.7 26.7 28.8 4.4

Thickness (ASTM D 6525)

Thickness (mils) 280 259 250 264 346 300 242 257 276 250 272 31

Water Absorption (ASTM D 1117/ECTC TASC 00197)

Pre-Soak Weight (grams) 17.9 15.4 16.3 15.6 17.8 16.6 1.1Post-Soak Weight (grams) 72.7 70.8 72.2 83.1 87.1 77.2 6.6

Weight Change (grams) 54.8 55.4 55.9 67.5 69.2 60.6 6.4% Weight Change 307.1 359.2 341.8 434.0 388.6 366.1 43.0

Light Penetration (ASTM D 6567)

Baseline Reading 325 325 325 325 325 325 0Reading with sample 30 24 39 37 35 33 6

% Light Penetration 9.2 7.4 12.0 11.4 10.8 10.2 1.9% Ground Cover 90.8 92.6 88.0 88.6 89.2 89.8 1.9

Mass/Unit Area (ASTM D 6475)

Mass of 12 x 14 in specimen (g) 15.69 24.42 21.75 35.4 25.45Mass/unit area (oz/sq.yd) 4.27 6.64 5.91 9.62 6.92 6.67 1.74Mass/unit area (g/sq. meter) 145 225 201 327 235 226 59

MD Machine DirectionTD Machine Direction

The testing herein is based upon accepted industry practice as well as the test method listed. Test results reported herein do not applyto samples other than those tested. TRI neither accepts responsibility for nor makes claim as to the final use and purpose of the material.TRI observes and maintains client confidentiality. TRI limits reproduction of this report, except in full, without prior approval of TRI.

Page 3: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

3:1 Slope

50 100 150 50 100 150 50 100 150 50 100 150

CONTROL 44.8 124.5 237.2 20.743 0.0167 47.7 109.8 252.6

GreensolutionsDNS-2

3.3 9.4 27.7 13.47 13.27 8.58 1.1459 0.0212 3.3 9.5 27.5 14.45 11.53 9.20

C-Factor 0.07 0.08 0.12 0.069 0.087 0.109

Erosion Control Product Testing Summary

Calculated Soil Loss Basedon Regression (g)

STANDARD INDEX TEST METHOD FOR the DETERMINATION of UNVEGETATED ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT (RECP)ABILITY TO PROTECT SOIL FROM RAIN SPLASH AND ASSOCIATED RUNOFF UNDER BENCH-SCALE CONDITIONS

ECTC Test Method #2:

* soil loss ratio = soil loss of unprotected surface (I.e. control) divided by soil loss with protected surface = 1 / C-Factor

Soil Loss Ratio* Based onRegression

SurfaceCondition

Rain Intensity, mm/hr Rain Intensity, mm/hr Rain Intensity, mm/hr Rain Intensity, mm/hr

Raw Soil Loss Data (g) Soil Loss Ratio* Based onRaw Data Regression Curve

Fitting

RECP Erosion Control Product - Soil Loss vs. Intensity

y = 0.12x1.5123

R20.9996 =

y = 0.002x1.8808

R20.9739 =

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr)

So

ilL

oss

(g)

CONTROL Greensolutions DNS-2 Power (CONTROL ) Power (Greensolutions DNS-2)

RECP Erosion Control Product - Soil Loss vs. Intensity

y = 20.743e0.0167x

R2 = 0.9832

y = 1.1459e0.0212x

R2 = 0.9999

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr)

So

ilL

oss

(g)

CONTROL Greensolutions DNS-2 Expon. (CONTROL ) Expon. (Greensolutions DNS-2)

Page 4: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Client: NTPEP Mass/Area (osy)Mfr: Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 6.67

TRI Log # E2280-13-10Sample ID: Greensolutions DNS-2

Slope = 3 TO 1

2 in/hr rainfallBuckets weighed and volume measured every 5 min Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3Test duration: 30 min Mass Mass Mass

43.24 61.17 41.43

Time(min)

Bucket No.Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Total RunoffVolume (ml)

Average TotalRunoff Volume

(ml)1 374 8.06 428 9.08 454 9.14 428 7.24 556 7.28 437 9.08 26782 395 9.43 485 10.16 460 8.01 442 7.02 372 8.37 471 6.21 2623 25703 328 5.21 409 6.30 423 6.49 406 5.54 412 5.97 432 5.86 2410

Average 7.6 8.5 7.9 6.6 7.2 7.1

Time(min)Total RunoffVolume (ml)

Average TotalRunoff Volume

(ml)Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Total Average 2306

Bucket No. Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) 2491 2408Cumulative 1 8.06 17.15 26.29 33.52 40.80 49.88 2429

soil loss 2 9.43 7.6 19.59 16.1 27.60 24.0 34.62 30.6 42.99 37.8 49.20 44.83 5.21 11.51 18.00 23.54 29.51 35.38

Avg Mass/Area (osy): 6.67

Time(min)

Bucket No.Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)1 327 1.23 401 0.60 362 0.38 343 0.47 391 0.28 482 1.05 43.24 360 5.492 390 1.06 404 0.68 362 0.53 310 0.41 426 0.32 599 1.32 61.17 360 7.763 253 0.13 451 0.48 406 0.47 391 0.12 426 0.32 502 0.59 41.43 360 5.26

Average 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 1.0

Time(min)Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Total Average Total Average

Bucket No. Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g)Cumulative 1 1.23 1.83 2.21 2.68 2.96 4.01 3.30

soil loss 2 1.06 0.8 1.74 1.4 2.27 1.9 2.68 2.2 3.00 2.5 4.32 3.5 5.02 3.333 0.13 0.61 1.08 1.20 1.52 2.11 1.66

Control

RECP Protected

5 10 15 20 25 30

IndividualSpecimenMass (g)

IndividualSpecimenArea (in2)

IndividualSpecimen

Mass/Area (osy)

30 Normalized

30

5 10 15 20 25 30

5 10 15

RECP over Soil

25

20 25

10 15 20

RECP Slope Simulation Test

Soil only

305

Page 5: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Client: NTPEP Mass/Area (osy)Mfr: Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 6.67

TRI Log # E2280-13-10Sample ID: Greensolutions DNS-2

Slope = 3 TO 1

4 in/hr rainfallBuckets weighed and volume measured every 5 min Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3Test duration: 30 min Mass Mass Mass

72.74 54.94 46.78

Time(min)

Bucket No.Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Total RunoffVolume (ml)

Average TotalRunoff Volume

(ml)1 946 29.12 1027 22.64 827 15.42 847 17.52 1009 22.43 847 16.48 55042 876 33.43 943 26.17 828 19.86 810 17.25 941 22.90 829 19.64 5228 54253 911 27.35 1026 23.94 862 16.70 865 15.67 1007 14.97 872 12.02 5542

Average 30.0 24.3 17.3 16.8 20.1 16.0

Time(min)Total RunoffVolume (ml)

Average TotalRunoff Volume

(ml)Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Total Average 5672

Bucket No. Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) 5038 5350Cumulative 1 29.12 51.76 67.18 84.70 107.13 123.61 5341

soil loss 2 33.43 30.0 59.60 54.2 79.46 71.5 96.71 88.4 119.61 108.5 139.26 124.53 27.35 51.29 67.99 83.66 98.63 110.65

Avg Mass/Area (osy): 6.67

Time(min)

Bucket No.Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)1 783 1.61 1297 1.56 1042 1.68 982 1.36 972 0.69 596 0.18 72.74 360 9.232 717 1.92 1145 2.04 884 2.30 858 0.88 876 0.81 559 0.65 54.94 360 6.973 659 3.09 1196 1.81 1027 2.60 1023 1.35 926 1.06 509 0.62 46.78 360 5.94

Average 2.2 1.8 2.2 1.2 0.9 0.5

Time(min)Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Total Average Total Average

Bucket No. Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g)Cumulative 1 1.61 3.17 4.85 6.21 6.90 7.08 9.79

soil loss 2 1.92 2.2 3.96 4.0 6.26 6.2 7.14 7.4 7.95 8.3 8.60 8.7 8.98 9.383 3.09 4.90 7.50 8.85 9.91 10.53 9.37

Control

RECP Protected

5 10 15 20 25 30

3025

IndividualSpecimenMass (g)

IndividualSpecimenArea (in2)

IndividualSpecimenMass/Area

(osy)

30 Normalized

15 20

RECP Slope Simulation Test

Soil only

5 10 15 20

RECP over Soil

255 30

5 10 15 20 25 30

10

Page 6: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Client: NTPEP Mass/Area (osy)Mfr: Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 6.67

TRI Log # E2280-13-10Sample ID: Greensolutions DNS-2

Slope = 3 TO 1

6 in/hr rainfallBuckets weighed and volume measured every 5 min Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3Test duration: 30 min Mass Mass Mass

45.49 63.95 49.87

Time(min)

Bucket No.Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Total RunoffVolume (ml)

Average TotalRunoff Volume

(ml)1 1421 53.29 1609 50.74 1567 33.61 1572 41.11 1613 34.56 1554 29.42 93362 1459 42.28 1767 51.8 1639 33.81 1760 35.83 1668 38.39 1603 27.92 9896 94693 1579 52.01 1672 52.83 1490 39.78 1476 33.89 1501 34.64 1458 25.83 9176

Average 49.2 51.8 35.7 36.9 35.9 27.7

Time(min)Total RunoffVolume (ml)

Average TotalRunoff Volume

(ml)Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Total Average 9222

Bucket No.Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) 9645 9300Cumulative 1 53.29 104.03 137.64 178.75 213.31 242.73 9035

soil loss 2 42.28 49.2 94.08 101.0 127.89 136.7 163.72 173.7 202.11 209.5 230.03 237.23 52.01 104.84 144.62 178.51 213.15 238.98

Avg Mass/Area (osy): 6.67

Time(min)

Bucket No.Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)Runoff

Volume (ml) Mass(g)1 1310 6.30 1628 5.81 1623 4.30 1686 6.02 1418 3.80 1558 3.66 45.49 360 5.772 1332 5.30 1880 4.77 1656 3.40 1629 2.42 1422 2.04 1726 7.07 63.95 360 8.113 1238 6.34 1577 6.06 1584 4.81 1692 4.84 1364 2.69 1580 3.43 49.87 360 6.33

Average 6.0 5.5 4.2 4.4 2.8 4.7

Time(min)Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Mass Average Total Average Total Average

Bucket No.Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g) Soil Loss(g)Cumulative 1 6.30 12.11 16.41 22.43 26.23 29.89 25.85

soil loss 2 5.30 6.0 10.07 11.5 13.47 15.7 15.89 20.1 17.93 23.0 25.00 27.7 30.40 27.663 6.34 12.40 17.21 22.05 24.74 28.17 26.71

Control

RECP Protected

5 10 15 20 25 30

IndividualSpecimenMass (g)

IndividualSpecimenArea (in2)

IndividualSpecimen

Mass/Area (osy)

30 Normalized

30

5 10 15 20 25 30

5 10 15

RECP over Soil

25

20 25

10 15 20

RECP Slope Simulation Test

Soil only

305

Page 7: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Shear Stress vs Soil Loss

y = 65.668e1.5573x

R2 = 0.998y = 8687.8x1.4551

R2 = 0.9872

0.0

450.0

900.0

1350.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Shear Stress (psf)

So

ilL

oss

(g)

Sand only

450 g = 1/2-in soil loss

ECTC Test Method #3:STANDARD INDEX TEST METHOD FOR the DETERMINATION of UNVEGETATED ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT (RECP)

ABILITY TO PROTECT SOIL FROM HYDRAULICALLY-INDUCED SHEAR STRESSES UNDER BENCH-SCALE CONDITIONS

Note: Shear stress ratio = 1.24 / 0.1 = 12.4

Greensolutions DNS-2

Page 8: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

rpm soil loss(g) shear stress(psf)CLIENT: Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 16 728 0.188TRI Log # E2280-13-10 20 1292 0.256Sample ID: Greensolutions DNS-2 27 2387 0.42

RECP over soil

Test duration: 30 min RADIUS = 11RPM: 15 SQ FT = 0.4295 slope 7063.41Shear Stress (psf): 0.69 intercept -565.26

R squared 1.00Average Shear = 0 -565.26

Bucket No. Mass(g) prior to test Soil loss(g) Shear = 0.50 2966.441 4010 450 0.14 = 1/2-inch intercept2 4095 196.73 4030

rpm soil loss(g) shear stress(psf)15 196.7 0.69

RECP over soil 20 446.7 1.2625 1143.3 1.82

Test duration: 30 min 4.75 65.67RPM: 20 450.11 1.24Shear Stress (psf): 1.26

AverageBucket No. Mass(g) prior to test Soil loss(g)

1 39702 3960 446.73 3930

RECP over soil

Test duration: 30 minRPM: 25Shear Stress (psf): 1.82

AverageBucket No. Mass(g) prior to test Soil loss(g)

1 40402 4030 1143.33 3950

Comments: Buckets weighed under water

recp

soil only

3600 360

Mass(g) post test Soil loss(g)3270 700

3810 220

soil only

3650 280

RECP Channel Simulation Test

Mass(g) post test Soil loss(g)3810 2003925 170

Mass(g) post test Soil loss(g)2645 13952920 11103025 925

Page 9: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Property Units Day Control GreensolutionsDNS-2

0 0.00 0.007 3.78 7.2214 7.78 11.0021 8.11 11.440 0.00 0.007 1.60 1.0014 2.58 3.1321 3.82 4.63

Plant Massper Area

mg per 4 sq.in. 21 13.09 55.10

Property Units Day Control GreensolutionsDNS-2

7 - -14 1 141%

21 1 141%

7 - -14 1 121%

21 1 121%

Plant Massper Area

% Improvement vs.Control

21 1 421%

AveragePlant Height

% Improvement vs.Control

AveragePlant Height

inch

SeedsGerminated

per Area

% Improvement vs.Control

ECTC Test Method #4:

STANDARD INDEX TEST METHOD FOR the DETERMINATION ofTEMPORARY DEGRADABLE RECP PERFORMANCE IN

ENCOURAGING SEED GERMINATION AND PLANT GROWTH

Germination / Vegetation Growth Summary

SeedsGerminated

per Area# per 4 sq.in.

Page 10: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

DateClient Top

TRI Log #Sample ID

Bottom

1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

5 9 13 4 6 0 3 12 13 13 14 18 6 7 2 8 16 15 14 15 18 6 7 2 8 17 16

0.3 1.8 0.7 0.9 1.7 1.7 1.2 0.4 3.6 4.3 2.6 4.2 1.1 0.8 5.2 1.5 3.3 4.3 4.3 2.8 5.6 7 1.9 6 2.2 40.9 0.7 1.3 1.6 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.6 2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.9 2.5 4.7 4.5 2.8 3.3 6 4.6 6.6 7.9 4.9 5.7 5.7 5.21 0.9 1 0.9 1.9 1.9 0.4 1.6 1.3 3.4 3.8 2.2 3 3.3 4.2 3.8 2.3 9.2 4.3 3.2 1 4.3 5.3 5.6

0.5 1 0.1 0.3 1.3 0.8 1.6 3.8 2.8 3 3.1 4.9 4.1 3.3 3.3 5 3.6 4.5 5.6 4.6 7.7 4.7 6.50.3 1.6 0.7 1 1.6 1.6 3.3 2.7 4 4.6 3.3 3.8 3.3 3.5 4.9 5.1 3.8 3.4 4.8 5 3.8 5.6

1 1.1 1.2 0.3 1.7 3.3 2.4 3.4 2.7 3.5 2.9 3.8 4.5 4.5 5.9 3.9 5.5 5.6 3.7 6.4 5.31.2 0.5 1.8 1.9 2.5 2.4 1.6 2.7 4 2.3 5.3 4.1 3.1 1.7 4.4 2.7 3.9 6.60.8 0.2 0.3 1.5 4.3 4.2 3.4 1.8 3.2 4.3 6.9 6.4 4.6 7.4 5.6 5.10.5 0.6 1.4 1.3 3.1 1.9 4.2 3.3 4 4.1 3 5.5 6 6.3

0.4 0.5 1.6 0.8 3.7 4.6 0.4 2.5 3 5.4 3.8 5.4 5.40.7 0.3 1.6 1.2 3.7 3.4 2.6 2.3 4 4.9 3.7 0.8 3.60.2 0.5 0.5 2.3 3.9 2.5 3.7 3.8 1.3 4.7 6 4.2 5.10.4 0.5 1.1 3.7 2.9 4.4 3.7 2.9 4.9 4.5 2.1 7.7

4.2 4.6 3.4 4.4 2.1 6.8 5.8 6.4 5.42.9 4 3.1 1.7 3.3 5.5 5.33.6 2.8 5.2 5.8 1.33.4 4.4 53.6 4.4

0.6 1.1 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.4 0.8 1.3 2.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.2 1.7 3.7 3.2 3.6 3.8 5.0 4.3 5.0 5.0 3.4 5.3 4.6 5.3

62.8 78.1 72.5 37.6 37.7 5.7 40.7 76 84.8

Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Temp (27 +/- 2 C)Humidity (45 +/- 5 % RH)

Light Intensity (900 +/- 100 ft-cd)Water Added (ml) 500 400 400

RECP Germination

Sample175 seeds

Industrial Fabrics, Inc.E2280-13-10

06/24/08

Bucket 3 Bucket 2

4" layer top soilGreensolutions DNS-2

RECP PROTECTED

Day 7 Day 14 Day 21

Number of Germinated Seeds Number of Germinated Seeds Number of Germinated Seeds

Bucket 3 Bucket 1 Bucket 2Bucket 1 Bucket 3Bucket 1 Bucket 2

Height of Germinated Plants Height of Germinated Plants Height of Germinated Plants

Average height of plants in each 2" square Average height of plants in each 2" square Average height of plants in each 2" square

Average height of plants in each bucket Average height of plants in each bucket Average height of plants in each bucket4.5 5.10.8 1.1 1.2 3.1 2.8

Average height of plants of Sample Average height of plants of Sample Average height of plants of Sample3.5 4.3

1.0 3.1 4.6Mass(mg) of plants in each 2" square

Total mass(mg) of plants in each bucket213.4 81 201.5

Total mass(mg) of plants for sample495.9

Average per square Average per square Average per square7.2 11.0 11.4

Average per square55.1

Page 11: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Date TopClient

TRI Log #Sample ID

Bottom

1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

8 10 6 0 0 0 4 3 3 9 6 12 9 6 11 6 3 8 10 7 12 9 6 11 6 4 8

1.4 2.1 1.5 1 1.2 2.3 2.5 3.7 2.2 3.1 1 1.9 3.6 3.1 3 4.4 5.4 3.9 2.9 2.4 4.3 3.8 4.6 4.82.2 1.6 1.4 1 1.4 1.2 3.1 2.7 3.4 1.9 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 4.1 6.7 2.8 2.7 4.4 3.2 4.2 5.1 4.12.3 2 2.4 0.9 2.4 1.3 4.1 3 3.1 1.9 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.1 2.4 4.6 3.8 4 1.7 2.8 3.4 4.7 3.8 4.41.8 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.8 3.1 3 1.7 2.1 1.8 3.6 2.5 2.7 4.3 4.1 2.7 3.7 4.4 4 1.1 4.11.3 1.6 2.5 2.6 3.1 2.6 3.2 1.7 1.5 2.2 2.9 4.7 5.4 3.4 2.8 3.4 3.3 4.4 3.71.2 2.3 1.2 2.1 4 2.8 3.1 2.2 2 1.8 2.5 3 4 4 2.1 1.3 3.2 3.8 4.21.1 2 2.5 3.1 1.8 2.5 2.1 5 4.6 4.2 3.9 3.7 51.2 1.5 1.6 2.8 2.6 2.9 3.4 2.5 4.5 3 4.5 4.7

2.3 2.1 3.4 2.1 2.5 4.2 4 5.1 4.42.3 3.5 1.4 2.3 3.4 2.9

3.5 1.7 4.4 2.63.6 4.2

1.6 1.9 1.7 1.1 1.7 1.6 2.5 3.3 3.1 2.4 2.0 2.1 2.7 2.6 2.6 3.8 4.9 3.9 3.0 3.0 3.6 4.2 3.7 4.4

12.3 13.1 19.2 9.4 6.6 14.6 12.7 10.3 19.6

Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Temp (27 +/- 2 C) 25.5 25 25.5 26.8 25.5 25.3 25.5 25 25.9 25.4 25 25.5 25 25

Humidity (45 +/- 5 % RH) 42 43 43 44 45 44 41 42 40 45 41 45 45 47Light Intensity (900 +/- 100 ft-cd) 827 844 832 848 830 851 836 842 850 818 881 865 857 861

Water Added (ml) 500 400 400

Thin layer of top soil175 seeds

4" layer top soil

Control

Day 7

Average per square13.1

4.1

Number of Germinated Seeds

Average per square8.1

Height of Germinated Plants

Average height of plants in each 2" square

Average per square Average per square

Total mass(mg) of plants for sample117.8

Mass(mg) of plants in each 2" square

Total mass(mg) of plants in each bucket44.6 30.6 42.6

2.9 3.2

1.6 2.6 3.8

Average height of plants in each bucket4.2

Average height of plants of Sample Average height of plants of Sample Average height of plants of Sample1.7 1.5 2.2 2.6

Average height of plants in each 2" square Average height of plants in each 2" square

Average height of plants in each bucket Average height of plants in each bucket

Height of Germinated Plants Height of Germinated Plants3.8 7.8

RECP Germination

07/17/07Industrial Fabrics, Inc.

Bucket 1 Bucket 2Bucket 1 Bucket 2 Bucket 3Bucket 1

ControlE2280-13-10

Day 14 Day 21Bucket 3Bucket 3

Number of Germinated Seeds Number of Germinated Seeds

Bucket 2

Page 12: AASHTO NTPEP Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Test Report08-01)-… · Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Industrial Fabrics, Inc. 510 O,Neal Lane 510 O,Neal Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70819

Bucket # 1 Greensolutions DNS-2 Bucket # 1 Control

Bucket # 2 Greensolutions DNS-2 Bucket # 2 Control

Bucket # 3 Greensolutions DNS-2 Bucket # 3 Control

Germination / Vegetation Growth Summary

Photographs

STANDARD INDEX TEST METHOD FOR the DETERMINATION of TEMPORARY DEGRADABLERECP PERFORMANCE IN ENCOURAGING SEED GERMINATION AND PLANT GROWTH

ECTC Test Method #4: