AA_Group12.pdf

5
Service Marketing Case Analysis American Airlines Inc.: Revenue Management Group No. 12 Harshitha | DM15217 Gaurav Dutta | DM15219 Rohit Rakshith | DM15247 Keerthi .P | DM15267 R.S.Pavithra | DM15134 Session 14

description

rt

Transcript of AA_Group12.pdf

 

 

S e r v i c e   M a r k e t i n g   C a s e   A n a l y s i s  

American  Airlines  Inc.:  Revenue  Management  Group  No.  12  Harshitha                     |  DM15217  Gaurav  Dutta     |  DM15219  Rohit  Rakshith                            |  DM15247  Keerthi  .P     |  DM15267  R.S.Pavithra     |  DM15134    

Session  14  

08  Fall  

Case  Facts:  

The  1978  Airline  Deregulation  Act  came  into  action,  resulting  in:  • Free Entry and Exit

• Route structure became an important tool for competitive strategy

• No Pricing restrictions

• Entry of many players in the market led to decrease in market share

• Decrease in prices

• Increase in fuel prices

Hub  and  Spoke  Model:  • Short haul flights

• Developing and managing time slots to provide convenient passenger arrival and departure with

same carrier and minimum delay

• At its Dallas/Fort Worth hub alone, American managed 12 complexes, involving 382 daily flights

to 95 cities, arriving and departing through 41 gates, and served out of over one million square

feet of terminal space

• National carriers acquired, merged with, or entered into formal and informal agreements with regional ones

Cost  Management:  • Two tier wage structure

• Pay less to new hires

• Fuel & maintenance cost

• New Aircraft with better fuel efficiency - lower maintenance costs, needs smaller crew

 

As  of  1988,  American  Airlines  had:  

Fleet  Size:  468  AircraLs  

Flights:  2200  per  day  

DesPnaPons:  151,  Largest  airline  in  the  US  

Total  Revenue:  USD  8.55  Billion  OperaPng  Income:  USD  801  Million  

Hubs:  6  hubs(  Dallas/Fort  Worth,  Chicago,  Nashville,  Raleigh/Durham,  San  Jose,  San  Juan)  

SWOT  Anlaysis:  Strengths Weaknesses

• Network - Multi-hub

• Quality of service

• SABRE

• “AAdvantage”

• Two Tier wage structure

• Old Revenue management system

• Operating system

• Pricing decision

Opportunity Threats

• Better Revenue Management system

• Price Indexing

• Over Booking

• Cannibalization by low cost carriers

• Human intervention

• Free entry/ Exit

Market  Segmentation  in  the  Airline  Industry:  Characteristics  of  the  two  types  of  passengers:  

Leisure   Business  Highly Price Sensitive Book earlier More flexible to departure and arrival times More accepting of restrictions such as Saturday night stayovers

Less price sensitive Book later Less flexible Less accepting of restrictions

Typical  airline  segmentation:  

Segment Business Leisure

Price Sensitivity Schedule Inflexibility Inventory Product

Low Need Last Seat Unrestricted Business

Moderate Important Somewhat restricted Corporate Discount

Sensitive Somewhat Restricted Discount Business

Moderate Prefers Restricted Regular Leisure

Very High Very flexible Very limited Sale fares Web only

Marketing  focused  on  the  three  following  areas:  • Revenue Management: Multiple fares and juggled their availability in order to maximize

revenue. American Airlines was well positioned as it was considered to be a leader in the use of

analytical tools to manage fare levels and availability.

• Ticket Distribution: SABRE (Semi-Automated Business Research Environment) gave American

a strong advantage in the ticket distribution business.

• Frequent Flyer Programs: American was the first to introduce this concept with its “A

Advantage’ program by offering free or upgraded flights to frequent travelers to build brand

loyalty.

Revenue  Management  The objective was to maximize passenger revenues by selling the right seats to the right customers at the

right prices

Steps  in  RM:  • Pricing - Influenced by airline’s cost structure and pricing philosophy, the behavior of

competitors and travelling preferences of customers. American Airlines estimated that about half

of all air travel prior to 1978 was at full fare; by 1988, discount fares were used more than 90% of

all domestic passengers, and average discount was around 60%

• Yield Management - Control the number of seats available in each fare category

• Optimize the trade-off between cost of an empty seat v. cost of turning away a full-fare passenger

Challenges  faced  by  AA: • The demand for full and discount-fare seats on any given flight was uncertain

• The demand was variable over time

• For leisure flights, the demand was also lumpy

• Multiple fare types

• The hub-and-spoke system - customers in one fare type more attractive than other customers

• Some customers booked seats but did not show up for their flights

American  Airlines  carried  out  yield  management  through  four  activities  at  each  flight  leg:  • “Indexing” of fare classes to buckets

• Deciding initial authorization levels for each bucket

• Adjusting authorization levels to reflect differences between forecasted and actual demand

• Adjusting authorization levels for market-specific factors such as conventions, city celebrations,

special events, etc.

Revenue  Management  Organization:  AA carried out five functions under revenue management:  • Domestic Pricing- this consisted of pricing strategy, pricing operations and pricing

implementation

• International Pricing- This was a separate organizational group which was responsible for

pricing for international traffic

• Yield Management Operations- This consisted of an operational support group with yield

management responsibilities for American’s critical flights and two separate tactical analysis

groups; one for leisure flights and the other for non-leisure, non-critical flights

• Pricing and Yield Management Systems Development- This was responsible for research and

applications development for decision support and product display

• Passenger Records Processing

Chicago-­‐West  Coast  Pricing  Decision:  

Problem:  • Main Competitors - United and Continental • ���Their offerings- Non-stop service and lower price • AA had an unacceptable level of load factors • ���UA had an advantage in flight schedule

What  AA  did:  • Competed on the basis of fares and flight schedules • Matched UA in fares but fell short in terms of flight schedule ��� • ���Full fare was USD 575 and discounted fare was USD 177

Recommendation:  • Work on flight schedules • Allocate discount seats with USD 10-20 premium with restriction like advance purchase.

This could dislocate Continental’s position of advantage. • Focus on better price mix��� • Change in metrics from load factor to Revenue per available seat mile (RASM)

New  York-­‐San  Juan  Pricing  Decision:  

Problem:  • Major Competitor – Eastern and TWA – offering non stop flight service • Predominantly point to point traffic • Off season fare - EA offered deep discounting – introduced restricted one-way fare of

USD 79 and USD 198 round trip for weekdays & USD 238 weekend fare

Users:  • Business traveler (round the year) • ���Leisure traveler peaked in summer��� • Other Passengers travelling to visit travelers without definite return plans • Common unrestricted fares rather than restricted round trip discount fares

Recommendations:  • Expand within the Caribbean market with more flights and better schedules for

connections • Promote attractive return fares and reap benefits of product bundling • Retain business traffic through incentives