A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of...

13
A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal Presented by Tom Bronga October 14, 2015 Mulituse Trail Design for Northeast Trail Connector in Far North Bicentennial Park

Transcript of A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of...

Page 1: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project ProposalPresented by Tom Bronga

October 14, 2015

Mulituse Trail Design for

Northeast Trail Connector in Far North Bicentennial Park

Page 2: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Far North Bicentennial Park Plan

Page 3: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Phase 1 of Northeast Trail Connector

Page 4: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

We conducted an informal, brief survey of the community Sent to parents of Scenic Park Elementary

Sent out through SFCC email

Sent to friends and neighbors and asked them to forward the survey to their neighbors

123 people completed the survey

Page 5: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Are you in favor of our community making NE Trail Connector a priority item?

Very supportive

Supportive

Somewhat supportive

Not at all

Rating Average

Response Count

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Very supportive Supportive

Somewhat supportive Not at all

100 15 7 1

Page 6: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Walking

/Dog

Walkin

g

Biking

Skiing

Hiking

Runn

ing

Comm

uting

Orient

eerin

g

Ski-jo

ring

Rolle

r blad

ing

Skat

e bo

ardin

g0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

In what ways does your family use the trails in our area? (Check all that apply)

Page 7: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

What are your barriers to trail use? (Check all that apply)

Page 8: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

What we have learned from the research and survey comments:

Tudor /Muldoon curve is a safety concern

Area plans include a proposed connector trail

Families want a safe trail to recreate

There is overwhelming support in making a NE trail connector a SFCC priority

Page 9: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Let’s take a look at the area more closely

C

lick to e

dit M

aste

r text sty

les

Seco

nd le

vel

Th

ird le

vel

Fo

urth

level

Fifth

level

Phase 1 Phase 2

Page 10: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

What a challenge! Many stakeholders to become involved:

SFCC, MOA parks, planning and zoning, FNBP, utilities, city and state officials, grant organizations and more.

Wetlands concerns

Community buy-in

This will probably be a multi phase project

Funding source(s) will be a challenge

Page 11: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Where we are now. Formed SF trails committee

Social media Facebook and Nextdoor groups

Work with a Joshua Durand, MOA park planner

Walked the route with Summer Youth Trails staff

SYEP researching exact boundries and best route.

Met with Alaska Parks Foundation Challenge Grant, it’s a good fit. Grant due this month

Working with a trails designer

Phase 1 Klutina St. to Regal Mountain

Phase 2 Regal Mountain to Campbell Road

Other possible phases:

Tudor to Regal Mt. along Tudor Road

36th to Klutina along the JBER fence line

Page 12: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Possible Trail work this summer Bridge work of wettest areas

Fill added to lower areas

SYE crews working

Volunteers needed to clear brush and move dirt

Page 13: A UAA Civil Engineering Senior Project Proposal · Safety Difficult access Time constraints Lack of grooming Impassable 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Scenic Foothills Trail Users Letter of Support from SFCC

NE connect on SFCC priority list

Help with the trails work