A Survey From Major Guidelines..in the treatment of CAP & bronchitis Prepared by: Magdy El-Shafei...
-
Upload
marybeth-bailey -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of A Survey From Major Guidelines..in the treatment of CAP & bronchitis Prepared by: Magdy El-Shafei...
A Survey From Major Guidelines..in the treatment of CAP & bronchitis
Prepared by:Magdy El-Shafei
Pharm BGroup Product Manager
Medical Union PharmaceuticalsM.U.P.
For the memory of a great Egyptian person in industry, Medical
practice and Manhood..
Prof./ Zakareya Gad
Honorarium
To discuss the recommendationsoutlined by major guidelines
For Bronchitis and CAP
Infectious Diseases Society of America American Thoracic SocietyThe Canadian guidelines for the management of AECB,
With a particular focus on what M.U.P.Offers for the best of our patients, Doctors and medical practice.
Objective
Controversial role of antibiotics•FEV1 > 50%•Exacerbations =OR> 4 /Yr.•Heart diseases•Use of Oxygen
•Antibiotics in the last 3 mo.
In AECB(ABECB)
How the antibiotics Are chosen for AECB
Evidence-based practiceEvidence-based practiceBest outcome for patientsBest outcome for patientsBest use of resourceBest use of resourceLeast resistanceLeast resistanceLeast costLeast costRestricts idiosyncratic Restricts idiosyncratic behaviourbehaviour
Strept. Pneumonia
Haemophylus influenzae
Contribute -With M. Ctarrahlalis- to 30-50% of bronchitis
Klebsiella Pneumonia
Staph. aureus
10-15%
Legionella PneumophilaChlamydia PneumoniaMycoplasma Pneumonia
>5 to15%
Strept. Pneumonia
Haemophylus influenzae
Klebsiella Pneumonia
Staph. aureus
Legionella PneumophilaChlamydia PneumoniaMycoplasma Pneumonia
In Pneumonia
Probably the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia
35.735.7 % % MortalityMortality
70% of the cases 1% Co-morbidities, Elderly31.8 %31.8 %
14.7 %14.7 %
P. aeruginosaP. aeruginosa
61.061.0% %
Strept. Pneumonia
Haemophylus influenzae
Klebsiella Pneumonia
Staph. aureus
Legionella PneumophilaChlamydia PneumoniaMycoplasma Pneumonia
P. aeruginosaP. aeruginosa
G+
G-
Atypical
Antibiotics differences
Ampicillin Amoxicillin
Clinical treatment failure
Strept. Pneumonia
Haemophylus influenzae
Klebsiella Pneumonia
Staph. aureus
Legionella PneumophilaChlamydia PneumoniaMycoplasma Pneumonia
P. aeruginosaP. aeruginosa
G+
G-
Atypical
Antibiotics differences
Macrolides
azithromycinClarithromycin
(spiramycin)
Strept. Pneumonia
Haemophylus influenzae
Klebsiella Pneumonia
Staph. aureus
Legionella PneumophilaChlamydia PneumoniaMycoplasma Pneumonia
P. aeruginosaP. aeruginosa
G+
G-
Atypical
Antibiotics differences
3rd generation cephalosporins
As penicillin resistance rates increase the rates and degrees of cephalosporin
resistance increase
Recent Studies done In Kasr El Aini Hospitals: 2009 – 2010
E.coli and Klebsiella producing cephalosporinase (ESBL) reached 75% in
one study and 90% in another study*
*Prof Dr. Maha Gaafar IC Dept. ElQuasr el Einy univ. hosp 2010
Strept. Pneumonia
Haemophylus influenzae
Klebsiella Pneumonia
Staph. aureus
Legionella PneumophilaChlamydia PneumoniaMycoplasma Pneumonia
P. aeruginosaP. aeruginosa
G+
G-
Atypical
Antibiotics differences
FQ
Ciproxacin
Strept. Pneumonia
Haemophylus influenzae
Klebsiella Pneumonia
Staph. aureus
Legionella PneumophilaChlamydia PneumoniaMycoplasma Pneumonia
P. aeruginosaP. aeruginosa
G+
G-
Atypical
Antibiotics differences
FQ
Moxifloxacinlevofloxacin
2010- 11 Surfing across major guidelines
• In cases of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), recent guidelines suggest:
using fluoroquinolone (moxifloxacin – levofloxacin) antibiotics as first-line therapy.
• This suggestion is based on level I evidence from several trials (clinical and microbial superiority of these agents).
• Fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin – levofloxacin) shorten hospital stay, reduce recurrences, and lower costs.
• Resistance is still very low.
M. Balter – CFP 2002 & 2010
Canadian guidelines recommendations for the treatment of AECB
Baseline Clinical Status
PathogensCriteria Factors
TreatmentAlternative For ttt.Failure
0 - Acute tracheobronchitis
Usually viral Cough and sputum
None,
consider macrolide (SPIRAMYCIN)or tetracycline
I- Simple chronic bronchitis
H influence, M catarrhalis, S pneumonia (Possible B-lectern resistance)
FEV1 > 50% increased sputum volume and purulence
Quinolone, penicillin + B- lactamase inhibitor(Amox. – Clav)Or (AMPICILLIN/SULBACTAM)
IIChronic bronchitis(with risk factors)
H influence, M catarrhalis, S pneumonia (resistance to B-lactams common)
As for class 2+any one of: FEV1
<50%. Advanced age, > 4 exacerbations, significant co morbidity
, May require parentral therapy or hosp.
IIIChronicsuppurative bronchitis
Above + Enterobacteria, P aeruginosa
class 3 + continuous sputum throughout year
2002
second- or third-generation cephalosporin
second-generation macrolide
If symtoms persist >10 D
Aminopenicllin
2011
second- or third-gen. cephalosporin 2nd gen. macrolide Ciprofloxacin
Moxifloxacin- levofloxacinpenicillin + B- lactamase inhibitor(Amox. – Clav)Or (AMPICILLIN/SULBACTAM)
Initial empiric therapy for suspected bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in immunocompetent adults.
LAST UPDATES: I D S A G U I D E L I N E S
Out patients
Inpatients
UNICTAM
3 Gram
Richard R. Yates Chest 1999
COULD CEPHALOSPRINS resistanceBE REVERSED??
Rahal; JAMA, October, 1999
COULD CEPHALOSPRINS resistanceBE REVERSED??
Managing AECB & CAP
In today`s guidelines
Combination penicillins
B- lactamase irreversible
Inhibitors
Like
Ampicillin/sulbactam
Amoxicillin/ clavlanic
(in CAP:Plus a macrolide)
Respiratory quinolones
3rd generation
(levofloxacin)
4th generation(Moxifloxacin)
Alone or plus Amp./sulbactam
CDCIDSA
Mayo Clinic
Moxifloxacin structure activity relationship
• Minimizes development of resistance
• Enhances anaerobic activity
• Higher gram-positive activity
• Minimizes efflux (S. pneumoniae, S. aureus)
Petersen et al 1996 Domagala, JM 1994
F
O OH
H
H
NH
NN
O6
5
7
H3CO
8
4
1
2
3
A greater binding Affinity to the topoisomerase enzyme
Mode of action that minimizes micro resistance
WIEDEMANN, Poster P0773, ECCMID Berlin 1999
11 000000 000000 CFUCFU
TOTO
11 000000 CFUCFU
Eradication in Eradication in 33 hrshrs..
Bactericidal inBactericidal inRECORD TIMERECORD TIME
Moxifloxacin
Modern 4Modern 4thth Generation F.Quinolone Generation F.QuinoloneWithWith Greater antimicrobial power on G +ve bacteriaG +ve bacteria
MoxifloxacinMoxifloxacin inhibits about
90%90% of strept. strains, while
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 20 )2002( 196/200
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
killedstreptococci
killedstreptococci
resiatant
ciprofloxacin only inhibits 42%.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
killedstreptococci
ciprofloxacin
moxifloxacin
MOMORDERN: RDERN: 4th Generation F.Quinolone4th Generation F.Quinolone
55 times higher concentrations
over ciprofloxacinciprofloxacin
In
Alveolar Macrophages
Data on File*Mean ± SD measured 3H after dosing with 400 mg Andrews, et al. JAC 40:573-577, 1997**Measured 2 and 4H after dosing with 500 mg ciprofloxacin
Tissue Penetration
MoxifloxacinMoxifloxacin High Respiratory Tissue High Respiratory Tissue PenetrationPenetration
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
100
0.12 S.pneumoniae , M.Catarrhalis
0.06 H.influenzae
MIC90
(mg/
l)
Andrews J et al.38th ICAAC, 1998;San Diego, A29
Respiratory tissue concentration after one single p.o dose
Bronchial
Mucosa
Epithelial LiningFluid(ELF)
Alveolar Macrophage
moxifloxacin
Clinical Success
CMAJ. 2008 March
comparisons of effectiveness and safety between
fluoroquinolones and β-lactam antibiotics. indicates a statistically significant
difference favours fluoroquinolone
therapy;.
In AECB
A single-arm analysis, comparing the efficacy of moxifloxacin with ciprofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) Adapted from ref. 1
1.Mittmann N, Jivarj F, Wong A, Yoon A. Oral fluoroquinolones in the treatment of pneumonia, bronchitis and sinusitis. Can J Infect Dis. 2002; 13 (5): 293-300.
AECB ( Cont’d)
A randomized, non-blinded, multinational, multicentre study comparing the efficacy of moxifloxacin with amoxicillin/clavulanate in 512 evaluable patients with clear signs of AECB.
Adapted from ref. 2
2.Schaberg T, Ballin I, Huchon G, et al. A multinational, multicentre, non-blinded, randomized study of moxifloxacin oral tablets compared with co-amoxiclav oral tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. J Int Med Res 2001;
29( 4 :)314-28.
Fast Eradication of Respiratory pathogens.
Quick relief of symptoms.
Rapid and Complete clinical cure.
Rare bacterial resistance.
Minimal Risk of Drug/food Interaction.
No Dose adjustment in elderly , renal or hepatic patients.
Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia In Immunocompetent Adults
Patient, SettingCommon PathogensEmpirical Therapy
Severely ill
S. Pneumoniae §Legionella spp.Gram-negative bacilliM. pneumoniaeVirusesS. aureus
Azithromycin, or fluoroquinolone‡ and cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or beta-lactam or beta-lactamase inhibitor¶
If P. aeruginosa possible—IV macrolide or fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside IV, or antipseudomonal quinolone and antipseudomonal beta-lactamIf MRSA possible, add vancomycin or linezolid
‡Levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin.§Critically ill patients in areas with significant rates of high-level pneumococcal resistance and a suggestive sputum Gram stain should receive vancomycin or a newer quinolone pending microbiologic diagnosis.
¶ ampicillin-sulbactam or Piperacillin-tazobactam. ¶Cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, high-dose amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, or parenteral ceftriaxone followed by oral cefpodoxime. **Cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ampicillin-sulbactam, or high-dose ampicillin
Be sure to cure in the time of
BIG CHALLENGE RTIs
What MUP offers
• Quality
• Scientific credibility
• Price
Best outcome for patientsBest outcome for patientsBest use of resourceBest use of resourceLeast resistanceLeast resistanceLeast costLeast costRestricts idiosyncratic Restricts idiosyncratic
Prof/ Maha Gaafar IC Dept. ElQuasr el Einy univ. hosp 2010
UNICTAM
Saving Cephalosporins abuse
Ampicillin/sulbactam
What MUP offers
• Quality
• Scientific credibility
• Price
Best outcome for patientsBest outcome for patientsBest use of resourcesBest use of resources
Least resistanceLeast resistanceLeast costLeast cost
Restricts idiosyncraticRestricts idiosyncratic
From Cleveland to Baltimore to Cairo
Few years ago with Prof. Dr Awad Tag ElDin
For what the martyrs died forbetter, free & dignity Egypt
The Egyptian Society of Chest &
Tuberculosis
•FEV1 > 50%•Exacerbations =OR> 4 /Yr.•Heart diseases•Use of Oxygen
•Antibiotics in the last 3 mo.
•Group 1•2nd G Macrolide•2nd or 3rd G cephalosporins•TMO-SMX•Doxycyclene
NoneOneOrMore
Improved worsen•FQ•Moxacin - Levanic
•Group II•FQ
•B-lactam/Blactamase•Ampicillin/sulbactam
Improved•Did not•improve
•Did not•improve
•Group III•Anbulatory patient•Hospitalized patient:
Consider Ps. AeroginosaeCiprofloxacin infusion
Can Resp J 2003
• Empiric Treatment – Outpatient:
– No confounding factors: macrolide (azithromycin 500mg x 1 day then 250mg Qday or clarithromycin 500mg po Q12hrs or clarithro-ER 1000mg Qday) or doxycycline 100mg Q12hrs
CAP:IDSIDSA-ATS Treatment Guidelines
• Empiric Treatment – Outpatient:
– Confounding factors present:
respiratory quinolone (levofloxacin 750mg Qday, moxifloxacin 400mg Qday)
or
beta-lactam (amoxicillin 1g Q8hrs, amox-clav-ER 2gm Q12hrs,
cefpodoxime 200mg Q12hrs, cefdinir 300mg Q12hrs, etc) + macrolide
or
beta-lactam + doxycycline
CAP:IDSIDSA-ATS Treatment Guidelines
• Empiric Treatment – Hospitalized, non-ICU:
– Beta-lactam (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ampicillin/sulbactam, or ertapenem) + macrolide or doxycyclineor
– Respiratory quinolone alone (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin)
CAP:IDSA-ATS Treatment Guidelines
• Empiric Treatment – Hospitalized, ICU:
– Beta-lactam (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ampicillin/sulbactam) + macrolide or respiratory quinolone
– PCN-allergic = resp quinolone + aztreonam
CAP:IDSA-ATS Treatment Guidelines
Fluoroquinolones for Respiratory Infections
Comparison of Recent Guidelines for Empiric Initial Therapy of CAP*
VariablesDrugs RecommendedModifying Factors
IDSA (Bartlett et al)
OutpatientDoxycycline, macrolide, or fluoroquinolone (no distinction)
Older patients: many prefer fluoroquinolone Underlying disease: many prefer fluoroquinolone Prevalence high PCN resistance: consider fluoroquinolone
Hospitalized ward
Cefalosporin + (macrolide or fluoroquinolone) or; β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor + macrolide;or; fluoroquinolone alone
ICU
)Cefalosporin or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor)+ (macrolide or fluoroquinolone(
Prior lung disease: (pseudomonal β-lactam [±β-lactamase inhibitor] or carbapenem)+ fluoroquinolone (high-dose ciprofloxacin) β-lactam allergy: fluoroquinolone ± clindamycin Suspect aspiration: fluoroquinolone ± (clindamycin, metronidazole, or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor)
Williams J. Jr.
VariablesDrugs RecommendedModifying Factors
CIDS/CTS (Mandell et al
Outpatient1st choice macrolide, or 2nd choice doxycycline
COPD: 1st choice newer macrolide, or 2nd choice doxycycline COPD + recent antibiotic or steroid: 1st choice respiratory fluoroquinolone (eg, levofloxacin or newer generation), or 2nd choices (amoxicillin/clavulonate+ macrolide), or 2nd-generation cephalosporin+ macrolide Suspect aspiration: 1st choice amoxicillin/clavulonate ± macrolide or 2nd choice respiratory fluoroquinolone + (clindamycin or metronidazole) Nursing home: respiratory fluoroquinolone
Hospitalized ward
1st choice IV respiratory fluoroquinolone or 2nd choice (2nd-, 3rd-, or 4th-generation cephalosporin+ macrolide(
ICU
1st choice respiratory fluoroquinolone + (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor) or 2nd choice IV macrolide + (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor)
Pseudomonas suspected: 1st choice antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone (eg, ciprofloxacin)+ (antipseudomonal β-lactam or aminoglycoside) or 2nd choice triple therapy with antipseudomonal β-lactam (eg, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, or meropenem) + aminoglycoside+ macrolide