A Space-time Finite Element Model1
-
Upload
paulojorgepiresmoita -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
0
Transcript of A Space-time Finite Element Model1
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 1/18
A SPACE-TIME FINITE
ELEMENT MODELFOR DESIGN AND
CONTROL OPTIMIZATIONOF NONLINEAR DYNAMICRESPONSE
J. E. Barradas Cardoso 1, P. Pires Moita 2, and Aníbal J. J. Valido2
1 Instituto Superior Técnico, Departamento de Engenharia MecânicaAv. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa , Portugal
2 Escola Superior de Tecnologia, Instituto Politécnico de SetúbalCampus do IPS, Estefanilha, 2914-508, Setúbal, Portugal
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 2/18
Introduction
• Integrated methodology
– structures and flexible mechanical systems
– optimal design and optimal control
– Bound formulation is used to solve both themulticriterium and unicriterium problems
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 3/18
Response Analysis
• Space discretization – Virtual work dynamic equilibrium equation
– After Finite element discretization
0 0( )t t t t t t t t W dV d
u u S f u Q u
t t t t t t
S S M U
+ C U + K U = P
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 4/18
Response Analysis
• Time discretization
e e e
S D z P
11 12 11 12
21 22 21 22
,
t t t
S S nxn nxn nxn
e t t t t t t e
S S S nxn S S nxn 1
t t t t t t
S S nxn S S nxn 2
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
K C M P
D D D D D P P
D D D D P
( , ), ( , )e t t t t t t t z z z z U, U
U
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 5/18
After the boundary conditions are applied it becames
Response Analysis
• Solved at-onceTime assembly
S D z P
ˆ ̂ ˆ ˆ
,S c c
K U P P P D U
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 6/18
•Performance functional
•Total variation
Design Sensitivity Analysis Problem
( , , )t t
G t dt z b
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 7/18
Design Sensitivity Analysis Problem
• Adjoint system method – adjoint fields replace the arbitrary variation of state fields by into the
virtual work equation as
– define an extended 'action' function
– replace the implicit design variations of the state fields by explicit designvariations and adjoint fields, then determining these adjoint fields by
vanishing the implicit design variation of the 'action' function as
– total design variation of
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) 0a a
SW = K U - P U
a A W
0 A
δΨ δA
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 8/18
Design Sensitivity Analysis Problem
The sensitivities are firstly performed at the elementlevel and then the sensitivity equations are
assembled and time boundary equations imposed
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 9/18
Optimum Design Problem
• A bound formulation is used to solve themulticriterium and unicriterium problems
•
The diferent objectives are normalizedaccordingly to
0
min , s.t.
, ( 1,2,..., );
0, ( 1,2,..., ); 0
0k
T
j
k m
j m
( ) ( ) , 1min max
0i 0i 0i 0i0i i iΨ Ψ Ψ w Ψ Ψ w
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 10/18
Examples
• Nonlinear ImpactAbsorberv(t=0)=1;
M=1;n=h2
Decision variables:
M
K=K0| u | n
C=C0| u .
| h
u
P(t)
0 0; ;[ / ), 0 12]K C P t t
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 11/18
Case I
Starting design:
Optimal design:
Examples
0 00,5; 0,5;[ / ) 0, 0 12]K C P t t
maxmin . .
1
a s t
u
0 00,00667; 6,96K C
-0,2
0, 0
0, 2
0, 4
0, 6
0, 8
1, 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 1 2t[s ]
P
[ N
]
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 12/18
Examples
-0,8
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0,0
0,2
0,4
0 2 4 6 8 10 1
t[s ] a [ m / s 2 ]
starting
Ko, CoKo, Co+control
Acceleration response
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 13/18
Case II
•Starting design:
•Normalized weighted bound formulation
•Optimal design
Examples
0 00,597; 0,597;[ / ) 0, 0 12]K C P t t
2 2 20min{ , (100 100 ) } . .
1
C E u u P dt s t
u
wE /wCo K O optimu
m
C O optimu
m
0.5/0.5 0.458 0.015
0.6/0.4 0.453 0.022
0.7/0.3 0.450 0.032
0.8/0.2 0.446 0.050
0.9/0.1 0.442 0.091-0,60
-0,40
-0,20
0,00
0,20
0,40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
t[s ]
P
[ N
P0,5/0,5
P0,6/0,4P0,7/0,3
P0,8/0,2P0,9/0,1
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 14/18
Examples
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
53 55 57 59 61 E
Co
Criterium Space
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 15/18
Examples
• Vehicle Suspension – Sinusoidal obstacle of height
0,1016m and wavelenghtof 24,384m
– minimize the maximumacceleration magnitudesuch that the relativevertical displacementbetween masses is not
larger than 0.05 m
c3
c5
1
m4 m3
m1
k1 c1
k2c2k3
k4c4k5
2 6
4
9
11
3 7
5
8
10
Beam element 1 Beam element 2
800kg400kg
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 16/18
Examples
Starting designA = 0.1 m2, k1 = 1.75E4, k2 = k3 = 5.26E4 N/m,
c1 = 1.75E3, c2 = c3 = 4.38E3 Ns/m
Optimal design
A = 0.35579 m2, K1=6.94E4 N/m, K2=6.31E4 N/m, K3=5.02E4
N/m, C1=1.E6 Ns/m, C2=1.34E4 Ns/m, C3=1.E2 Ns/m
-1.4E-03
-1.2E-03
-1.0E-03
-8.0E-04
-6.0E-04
-4.0E-04
-2.0E-04
0.0E+00
2.0E-04
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
t[s]
P [ N ]
( ) 0.,0 1P t t s
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 17/18
Examples
• Driver seat max. acceleration [m/s2]
-6.0E-05
-5.0E-05 -4.0E-05
-3.0E-05
-2.0E-05
-1.0E-05
0.0E+00
1.0E-05
2.0E-05
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
t[s]
a[m/s ]
Initial Design Optimal design wrt area Optimal design wrt area, K’s and C’s Optimal design wrt area, K’s and C’s + control
8/3/2019 A Space-time Finite Element Model1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-space-time-finite-element-model1 18/18
CONCLUDING REMARKS
• Current formulation unifies in one single formulation the problems ofoptimum design and optimal control, treating the design variables ascontrol variables that do not change with time.
• Using at-once integration of the equations of motion and itssensitivities, the adjoint method of design sensitivity analysis can beused with all of its advantages and without its main disadvantage indynamics: the necessity of backwards integration of the adjointsystem. So, the needing of backwards integration with its majordrawback - the memorization of the response history - is notassociated with path-dependent problems, as it is frequentlyassumed, but it is associated with the fact of using step-by-step
integration.
• Temporal boundary conditions can be applied at any point in time,not necessarily at the start of the integration, as it is usual for thestep-by-step integration method.