A scan ultrasonography

32
A Scan Ultrasonography Presenter : D Samuel Ponraj Moderator : Dr PRR

Transcript of A scan ultrasonography

Page 1: A scan ultrasonography

A Scan Ultrasonography

Presenter : Dr Samuel PonrajModerator : Dr PRR

Page 2: A scan ultrasonography
Page 3: A scan ultrasonography
Page 4: A scan ultrasonography

Physics of Ultrasound

• Ultrasound passes through the tissue , part of the wave is reflected back towards the probe

• Echoes formed at -- acoustic interfaces that are created at the junction of media with different

sound velocities. • The greater the difference in sound velocities of

the media at the interface, the stronger is the echo.

Page 5: A scan ultrasonography

Instrumentation

• Pulser • Reciever• Display System

Page 6: A scan ultrasonography
Page 7: A scan ultrasonography

A Scan Mode

Page 8: A scan ultrasonography

GAIN

Highest gain widest sound beam Highest penetration Max Spike Height(Visualisation of Weak Signals)-PVD,Vitreous Opacities

LOWEST GAIN WEAKEST PENETRATION DECREASED SPIKE HEIGHT (RETINA , SCLERA )

Page 9: A scan ultrasonography

Indications

• To detect ,measure and differentiate tumours and follow up.

• Biometry for accurate Axial length measurement for IOL calculation.

• Morphological characteristics – AC depth, Corneal thickness,Lens thickness and relative position.

Page 10: A scan ultrasonography

ADVANTAGES

• Easy to use• No Ionizing radiation• Excellent Tissue Differentiation• Cost Effectiveness

Page 11: A scan ultrasonography

Interpretation

a: Initial spike (probe tip and cornea)b: Anterior lens capsulec: Posterior lens capsuled: Retinae: Scleraf: Orbital fat

Page 12: A scan ultrasonography
Page 13: A scan ultrasonography
Page 14: A scan ultrasonography

Topographic Echography

Category Point-like Membrane-like Space-occupyingEchogram Single spike Single spike or

chain of spikesChain of Spikes

Differential diagnosis

Foreign body Retinal detachment

Melanoma

Vitreous opacities Choroidal detachment

Retinoblastoma

Vitreous membranes

Hemangioma

Tumor surfaces Vitreous Haemorrhage

Assessment of shape, location and elevation of lesions

Page 15: A scan ultrasonography

Quantitative Echography

1. Internal Structure Reflectivity (Size & Arrangement of interfaces)- Regular low – Melanoma- Regular High – Haemangioma- Irregular – Metastatic Carcinoma

Page 16: A scan ultrasonography

2. SOUND ATTENUATION Scattering,absorption or reflectivity of Sound energy

Steeper the Kappa angle

Greater the Sound attenuation(Bone, Foreign Body)

Page 17: A scan ultrasonography

KINETIC ECHOGRAPHYKinetic Echography

(Low gain)

Spontaneous movements(Stationary eye ) – vascular lesion

After movements{ Following Cessation of Eye Movements }

- PVD,RD

Page 18: A scan ultrasonography

Common Ocular Pathologies

VITREOUS FLOATER

VITREOUS HAEMORRHAGE

Page 19: A scan ultrasonography

ENDOPHTHALMITIS

POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT

Page 20: A scan ultrasonography

RETINAL DETACHMENT

Intra Ocular Lens

Page 21: A scan ultrasonography

CHOROIDAL MELANOMA

CHOROIDAL HEMANGIOMA

METASTATIC CARCINOMA

Page 22: A scan ultrasonography

RETINOBLASTOMA

CHOROIDAL DETACHMENT

Page 23: A scan ultrasonography

DISLOCATED LENS INTO VITREOUS

APHAKIC EYE

Page 24: A scan ultrasonography

CONTACT TECHNIQUE

Page 25: A scan ultrasonography
Page 26: A scan ultrasonography

IMMERSION TECHNIQUE

Page 27: A scan ultrasonography

Immersion B-scan/vector A-scan technique

Page 28: A scan ultrasonography

Adjustments to UltraSound Velocity settings

OCULAR MEDIA

ULTRA SOUND VELOCITY

THICKNESS CORRECTION FACTOR

CORNEA 1641 M/SEC +0.55 +0.04 mm

AQUEOUS 1532 M/SEC

LENS 1628 + 4.72 +0.28 mm

VITREOUS 1532 M/SEC

TRUE AXIAL LENGTH = AAL 1532 + 0.04 mm + 0.28 mm = AAL 1532 + 0.32 mm

Page 29: A scan ultrasonography

COMPARISON BETWEEN CONTACT TECHNIQUE AND IMMERSION TECHNIQUE OF BIOMETRY

Contact technique Immersion technique

Patient is in a more comfortable position, sitting

Patient is in a supine or reclining position

Variability from one test to next is present due inconsistent corneal compression

No variability since probe does not come in contact with cornea

Axial length measured is shorter by an average of 0.24 mm

Axial length measured is closer to the true value

Page 30: A scan ultrasonography

Limitations and Pitfalls

• Multiple Artifacts• Attenuation Artifacts• Low reflective Spike• Small tumours with False Negatives• Intraocular foreign body• Contact technique problem• Misalignment

Page 31: A scan ultrasonography

MISALIGNMENT

SILICON OIL GLOBE

Page 32: A scan ultrasonography