A REVISIT OF THE NAME -NOSTRATIC-.doc

8/11/2019 A REVISIT OF THE NAME -NOSTRATIC-.doc

1/9

A REVISIT OF THE NAME "NOSTRATIC"

by

Polat Kaya

In an earlier paper of mine, http://www.storm.ca/~cm-tntr/nostratic.html, written inTurkish (dated May 1, !!", I had discussed the etymolo#y of the word

$%&T'TI) and shown that it was related to the Turkish lan#ua#e in many ways.The so-called proto lan#ua#e $%&T'TI) actually refers to the Turkish lan#ua#e- without namin# it. In this paper, I will re*isit the word $%&T'TI) and add to itwith new insi#ht that will +rin# e*en more clarity to this word and its etymolo#y.e will see that despite the camoufla#e created +y way of ana#rammatiin#, the

word $%&T'TI) is made up from Turkish words and the so-called protolan#ua#e $%&T'TI) indeed was the Turkish lan#ua#e.

%n the name $ostratic, the followin# story shown in red is from ikipedia - a sitewhich I re#ard as a #ood-willed or#aniation that pro*ides +ase information onmany su+ects. 0or that I thank them. 0rom ikipedia,http://en.wikipedia.or#/wiki/$ostratic, we ha*e:

"Origin of the Nostrati hy!othesis

The last uarter of the 12th century saw *arious lin#uists puttin# forward proposalslinkin# the Indo-3uropean lan#ua#esto other lan#ua#e families, such as 0inno-4#ricand ltaic.567

These proposals were taken much farther in 12!8 when 9ol#er edersen, a maor;anish lin#uist, proposed $ostratic, a common ancestor for the Indo-3uropean,0inno-4#ric, &amoyed, Turkish,Mon#olian,Manchu,our fellow-countryman> (plural: nostrates". &ome lin#uists who +roadly accept the conceptha*e criticised the name as reflectin# the ethnocentrismfreuent amon# 3uropeansat the time.5?73*en so, it ar#ua+ly transcends these associations. roposedalternati*e names such asMitian, formed from the characteristic $ostratic first- andsecond-person pronouns mi>I> and ti>you>,5@7ha*e not attained the same currency.

n early supporter was the 0rench lin#uist l+ert )uny A +etter known for his rolein the de*elopment of the laryn#eal theory527A who pu+lished hisRecherches surle vocalisme, le consonantisme et la formation des racines en nostratique ,

anctre de l'indo-europen et du chamito-smitique(>'esearches on the Bocalism,)onsonantism, and 0ormation of 'oots in $ostratic, ncestor of Indo-3uropean
http://www.storm.ca/~cm-tntr/nostratic.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finno-Ugric_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finno-Ugric_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic#cite_note-5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holger_Pedersen_(linguist)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Europeanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finno-Ugrichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samoyedic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchu_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchu_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukaghir_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukaghir_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eskimo-Aleut_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Asiatic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Asiatic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocentrismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic#cite_note-6http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic#cite_note-7http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laryngeal_theoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laryngeal_theoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic#cite_note-8http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finno-Ugric_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finno-Ugric_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic#cite_note-5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holger_Pedersen_(linguist)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Europeanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finno-Ugrichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samoyedic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchu_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukaghir_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eskimo-Aleut_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Asiatic_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocentrismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic#cite_note-6http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic#cite_note-7http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laryngeal_theoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic#cite_note-8http://www.storm.ca/~cm-tntr/nostratic.html


2/9

and 9amito-&emitic>" in 12C8. lthou#h )uny enoyed a hi#h reputation as alin#uist, the work was coldly recei*ed.

hile edersen>s $ostratic hypothesis did not make much headway in the est, it+ecame uite popular in what was then the &o*iet 4nion. orkin# independently atfirst, Bladisla* Illich-&*itychand haron ;ol#opolskyela+orated the first *ersionof the contemporary form of the hypothesis durin# the 126!s. They eDpanded it toinclude additional lan#ua#e families. Illich-&*itych also prepared the firstdictionary of the hypothetical lan#ua#e.

It is sad that this ikipedia entry is full of confusin# *er+olo#y and mytholo#yre#ardin# the so-called "NOSTRATIC lan#ua#e. They are tryin# to apply theconcocted term NOSTRATIC to a world-wide spoken lan#ua#e that eDisted in

ancient times +ut did not ha*e that name. I ha*e already written a paper re#ardin#the name NOSTRATIC" where I demonstrated the +o#usness of this proposedname. This artificial name NOSTRATIC as defined a+o*e falsely ele*ates the

present Indo-3uropean and&emitic lan#ua#es to +e at par with those ancientpeople who spoke that ancient world-wide lan#ua#e. These Indo-3uropeans -called ryans - such as the #ypsy Ereeks, 'omans and the #ypsies of the Fa+ylonand their other relati*es, who infiltrated the Turanian lands in sia and 3uropeand fa+ricated their so-called own lan#ua#es from that one ancient lan#ua#e theworld spoke, are now tryin# to concoct a le#itimiin# +ase for their lan#ua#eswhich they artificially fa+ricated from that one world lan#ua#e. That one

mother/father lan#ua#e was the Turkish lan#ua#e of the ancient Turanian world.This I will show +elow.

They say that The nameNostraticderi*es from the =atinword nostrasmeanin#'our fellow-countryman' (plural: nostrates".

This is a false claim to which I say the followin#: $ot only is the so-called=TI$ lan#ua#e an artificial lan#ua#e fa+ricated from Turkish, +ut so too is the

name NOSTRATIC- which is also made up from a well known Turkish name.This we can see as follows:

a" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as"TORCISTAN", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied, restructured, 'omaniedand stolen form of the Turkish name T#RKISTANwhich e*eryone knows - andassociates with the Turks. hat this means is that this so-called term Nostratiis aconcoction made up from the name T$r%istan. In other words, the name Turkistanhas +een deli+erately stolen +y some 3uropean lin#uists. This shows how cunnin#and decepti*e those lin#uists were - and how the world is +ein# taken for a wild

#oose chaseG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladislav_Illich-Svitychhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aharon_Dolgopolskyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladislav_Illich-Svitychhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aharon_Dolgopolskyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin


3/9

T#RKISTANis the homeland of Turkish peoples in )entral sia. Thus, the termNOSTRATICis a +o#us name which is fa+ricated from this Turkish name, ratherthan +ein# dri*ed from the so-called =TI$ word NOSTRAS. This is adishonest etymolo#y and decepti*e lin#uistics. It is desi#ned to con andmisinform thousands of honest lin#uists who spend their li*es tryin# to understandthe truth +ehind so many world lan#ua#es. This >sophisticated> and dishonestlin#uistic trick has +een used for thousands of years +y the wanderer #roups whonot only stole the Turkish lan#ua#e +ut also prepared a lin#uistic +ase into whichthey usurped the ancient Turanian Tur/THrk/%#u ci*iliation and Turkish statenames. Fy doin# this, they not only o+literated the ancient Turan ci*iliations fromhistory, they also transferred ownership of those ancient Turanian ci*iliations tothemsel*es. )on*ertin# the name T$r%istanto Nostratiis a perfect eDample ofthis. Fy ana#rammatiin# ancient Turkish state names into some non-Turkish

formats, they manufactured state names and la+elled them as unknown people -or fictitious ryan and &emitic state names that did not eDist +efore. Thus,they +oth o+literated those ancient Turanian ci*iliations from history and also theyusurped them. 0or instance, the *ery ancient and lon#-li*ed Turanian state ofM&' (MI&I'" has +een con*eniently renamed to 3E


4/9

d" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "TANRI&OCST", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "TANRI O,#-T$" 'TANRI O,#-(# TANRI O K/-()+meanin#"it is God OGU".

Turkish word TANRImeans "God", O,#- 'O,#-+is one other "ancestoralname" of Tur/Turk/%#u peoples.

e" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "TANRI&COST", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "TANRI K/-T0" 'TANRI ATASHTI TANRI K/-()+ meanin#

"God is fire". This refers to the &un-Eod, that is, the ,)N&TANRIof ancientTuranians.

Turkish word K/-means "glowing fire", K/-() means "it is glowing fire".

f" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "TANRI&COST", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "TANRI&COS0T0 meanin# "it is God's eye". This refers, firstand foremost, to the S#N(Turkish ,)N". &econdly, it would refer to the M%%$which was also re#arded as the "eye"of the &ky-Eod in ancient Turanian reli#ion.It is curious that the 3n#lish word eye which is *oiced as A1 is the Turkishname < meanin# moon. Is this coincidence %f course not. 3n#lish, ust likeall other indo-3uropean lan#ua#es, is an artificially fa+ricated lan#ua#e made upfrom Turkish. This word eye is another e*idence of this factG

Turkish word ,/-means "eye", ,/-() means "it is the eye".

#" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "T&CONASTIR", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "aTa&K#NA2TIR" 'ATA ,)NE2TIR+ meanin# "!ather is the

un".

Turkish word ATAmeans "father", ,)NE2 'K#NA2+means "sun# sunlight".

h" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "T&CONASTIR", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of the

Turkish name "$T$&K#NA2TIR" '#T# ,)NE2TIR meanin# "UTU $theTurko-umerian% un-God is the un".


5/9

i" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "T&CONASTIR", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "aTi&K#NA2TIR" 'ATI ,)NE2TIR+ meanin# "&ts name is

un".

Turkish word ,)NE2 ',)N 3 I2I+ means "sun# sunlight".

" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "T&CONASTIR", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "aTi&KON#2TIR" 'ATI KON#2TIR+ meanin# "&ts name isspeech, its name is language".

Turkish word KON#2(,ON#2" means "word, speech# speak, say".

k" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "T&CANOSTIR", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "aTi&KAN#2TIR" 'ATI ,AN#2TIR+ meanin# "&ts name isunderstanding, its name is learning, its name is schooling".

Turkish word KAN#2(,AN#2, KANI2" means "understanding".

l" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "T&CONASTIR", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "aTi&oK#N#2TIR" 'A(I OK#N#2TIR+ meanin# "its name isreading, writing, going to school# its name is learning# its name is acuiring

knowledge".

Turkish word OK#means "study# learn# read, write", OK#N#2means

"reading# (eing read".

m" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "COR&AN&T&IST", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of the Turkishname "KOR&AN&(eI2Ti" ',/K KOR$ (E1I2TIR ,)NE2 (E1I2I(IR,#NE2 (I.I(IR" - meanin# "&t is the un )anguage"- which is TurkishG %fcourse we also see that the Turkish J%' $ meanin# the fire of &ky, that is, the&un, is also the same as the so-called ra+ic name K#R4ANwhich is the nameof the Islamic "*oly +ook". Is this a coincidence $ot likelyG

Turkish word KORmeans "glowing fire", ANmeans "sky# time# ancient


6/9

Turkish plurality suffi", ,/K KOR$means "sky fire, sun".

n" hen the word NOSTRATICis rearran#ed letter-+y-letter as "ATIN&COSTR", it re*eals itself as an ana#rammatied and 'omanied form of theTurkish name "A(IN ,/-()R meanin# "your name is eye". This refers to the9uman ye as well as the eyes of all animals. The E1E ',/-+sees all thin#sthat are lit up +y the sun rays and transfers that information to the human +rain to

+e e*aluated for the purpose of sur*i*al and acumulation of knowled#e, and for the+etterment of life which is done all +y the human +rain - which is a #od orcreator itself. Thus the 3


7/9

the people of the world - which has +een enoyed to this day - without +ein#

reco#nied. 0or instance, lan#ua#e, readin#, writin#, alpha+et, schoolin#, learnin#

- to name a few. Those lin#uists who concocted the term $%&T'TI) were

simply usurpin# the #lory of the ancient Turanian Turkish lan#ua#e and ci*iliation

with one hand and intentionally o+literatin# them with the other.

In the a+o*e citin# from ikipedia, it says that the proposed "Nostratic" is a

common ancestor for the ndo-!uropean, inno-#$ric, %amo&ed, ur(ish,

Mon$olian, Manchu, )u(a$hir, !s(imo, %emitic, and *amitic lan$ua$es, +ith the

door left open to the eventual inclusion of others. In this list of lan#ua#es, 0inno-

4#ric, Mon#olian, Manchu,


8/9

the distorted form of the Turkish suffiD i6i iti meanin# it is. This is also thecase for all other 3n#lish names that include this suffiD.

s for the other ones, that is, the so-called Indo-3uropean (ryan (rayan"" and the

&emitic lan#ua#es - I ha*e repeatedly stated that they are lan#ua#es manufacturedfrom Turkish +y way of ana#rammatiin# Turkish words and eDpressions. I ha*e

#i*en many eDamples demonstratin# this fact. nd +ecause these lan#ua#es werefa+ricated from the Turkish lan#ua#e, Turkish +ecomes an ancestor lan#ua#e to

them as well.

Thus, Turkish was the most widely used lan#ua#e in the ancient world. It is no

wonder that E3$3&I& 11 mentions that they all spoke one world lan#ua#e. This

was so +efore it was intentionally confused +y Oeho*a +elie*ers and ryans(rayans".

Oudeo-)hristianity usurped e*ery reli#ious concept from the ancient Turanian

world-wide reli#ion of the &J


9/9

C/!6/!!2

A REVISIT OF THE NAME -NOSTRATIC-.doc

Documents

Transcript of A REVISIT OF THE NAME -NOSTRATIC-.doc