A Review of Wet Chemical Etching of Glasses in Hydrofluoric Acid … · It can be readily dissolved...

8
1. Introduction Glasses, due to their unique properties, are widely used in the optical devices, MEMS devices, and solar cells. The optical transparent and the ability to withstand much light scattering influences can be considered as the most remarkable properties in this respect. Glass is a combination of the relative ease with which the material can give the desired shape due to its unique the light trapping properties of the solar cell. The thin film silicon solar cell is a great potential as photovol- taic devices. The production on a large scale in a fully automated manner allows glass substrate and low material usage, low cost per watt is better than crystalline Si solar cells. 1,2) In thin film silicon solar cells, hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) or microcrystalline silicon (μc-Si:H) used as an absorption layer. To have an effectively light absorption to the solar cell, light management in the textured surface is necessary for the high- efficiency solar cell. Surface texturing can result in enhanced scattering from transmitted light and then low reflection on the surface of the incoming light. 3) Textured surface increases the optical path length, which is improved the photocurrent and quantum efficiency as well. To make the surface morphology of the light trapping, it obtained by etching process like wet chemical, dry and direct pattern. 4-6) Textured surface allowed more light scattering and low reflection at rough internal interfaces, leading to more efficient light trapping and subsequent increase of light absorption in the solar cell. Textured surface regarding light trapping carried out on the transparent conductive oxide layer (TCO) of thin film silicon solar cells. Chemical etched AZO films shows better light trapping properties, it is only efficient at shorter wavelengths, but with relatively decreases at longer wavelengths. It must be obtained to reduce the loss for better light scattering and internal reflection. It can be readily dissolved by hydrofluoric acid or other HF containing aqueous solutions at room temperature. 7) Controlled dissolution in HF-based etchants can be applied to remove material using related glass application. Wet chemical etching of glasses in aqueous HF solutions is a subject that has studied for many years. Scheele et al. reported about the discovery of HF in 1771 8) and then is being studied more extensively, due to the solar cell application for the light trapping as the substrate. For achievement of better light trapping using etching tech- nique, it considered for scattering effect having a small-sized structure in the short wavelength and large sized structure in the long wavelength region, respectively. Recently, there are several reports related to the etching by random, periodic using photo- lithography pattern for light trapping; most research is rarely systematic study for the substrate of thin film silicon solar cells. In this study, the reaction mechanism, etch rate as well as the surface morphology reviewed, and the effect of the glass types, Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017) pISSN 2288-3274 DOI:https://doi.org/10.21218/CPR.2017.5.3.075 eISSN 2508-125X A Review of Wet Chemical Etching of Glasses in Hydrofluoric Acid based Solution for Thin Film Silicon Solar Cell Application Hyeongsik Park 1,3) Jae Hyun Cho 1) Jun Hee Jung 2) Pham Phong Duy 1) Anh Huy Tuan Le 1) Junsin Yi 1) * 1) College of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea 2) Department of Energy Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea 3) Electronic Convergence Materials & Device Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute, Seongnam 13509, Korea ABSTRACT: High efficiency thin film solar cells require an absorber layer with high absorption and low defect, a transparent conductive oxide (TCO) film with high transmittance of over 80% and a high conductivity. Furthermore, light can be captured through the glass substrate and sent to the light absorbing layer to improve the efficiency. In this paper, morphology formation on the surface of glass substrate was investigated by using HF, mainly classified as random etching and periodic etching. We discussed about the etch mechanism, etch rate and hard mask materials, and periodic light trapping structure. Key words: Light trapping, Wet etching, Chemical, Hydrofluoric acid, Thin film, Solar cell *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received June 8, 2017; Revised June 14, 2017; Accepted August 15, 2017 2017 by Korea Photovoltaic Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 75

Transcript of A Review of Wet Chemical Etching of Glasses in Hydrofluoric Acid … · It can be readily dissolved...

  • 1. Introduction

    Glasses, due to their unique properties, are widely used in the

    optical devices, MEMS devices, and solar cells. The optical

    transparent and the ability to withstand much light scattering

    influences can be considered as the most remarkable properties

    in this respect. Glass is a combination of the relative ease with

    which the material can give the desired shape due to its unique

    the light trapping properties of the solar cell.

    The thin film silicon solar cell is a great potential as photovol-

    taic devices. The production on a large scale in a fully automated

    manner allows glass substrate and low material usage, low cost

    per watt is better than crystalline Si solar cells.1,2) In thin film

    silicon solar cells, hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) or

    microcrystalline silicon (μc-Si:H) used as an absorption layer.

    To have an effectively light absorption to the solar cell, light

    management in the textured surface is necessary for the high-

    efficiency solar cell. Surface texturing can result in enhanced

    scattering from transmitted light and then low reflection on the

    surface of the incoming light.3)

    Textured surface increases the optical path length, which is

    improved the photocurrent and quantum efficiency as well. To

    make the surface morphology of the light trapping, it obtained

    by etching process like wet chemical, dry and direct pattern.4-6)

    Textured surface allowed more light scattering and low reflection

    at rough internal interfaces, leading to more efficient light trapping

    and subsequent increase of light absorption in the solar cell.

    Textured surface regarding light trapping carried out on the

    transparent conductive oxide layer (TCO) of thin film silicon solar

    cells. Chemical etched AZO films shows better light trapping

    properties, it is only efficient at shorter wavelengths, but with

    relatively decreases at longer wavelengths. It must be obtained

    to reduce the loss for better light scattering and internal reflection.

    It can be readily dissolved by hydrofluoric acid or other HF

    containing aqueous solutions at room temperature.7) Controlled

    dissolution in HF-based etchants can be applied to remove

    material using related glass application. Wet chemical etching

    of glasses in aqueous HF solutions is a subject that has studied

    for many years. Scheele et al. reported about the discovery of HF

    in 17718) and then is being studied more extensively, due to the

    solar cell application for the light trapping as the substrate.

    For achievement of better light trapping using etching tech-

    nique, it considered for scattering effect having a small-sized

    structure in the short wavelength and large sized structure in the

    long wavelength region, respectively. Recently, there are several

    reports related to the etching by random, periodic using photo-

    lithography pattern for light trapping; most research is rarely

    systematic study for the substrate of thin film silicon solar cells.

    In this study, the reaction mechanism, etch rate as well as the

    surface morphology reviewed, and the effect of the glass types,

    Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017) pISSN 2288-3274

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.21218/CPR.2017.5.3.075 eISSN 2508-125X

    A Review of Wet Chemical Etching of Glasses in Hydrofluoric

    Acid based Solution for Thin Film Silicon Solar Cell ApplicationHyeongsik Park1,3) ․ Jae Hyun Cho1) ․ Jun Hee Jung2) ․ Pham Phong Duy1) ․ Anh Huy Tuan Le1) ․ Junsin Yi1)*

    1)College of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea2)Department of Energy Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea

    3)Electronic Convergence Materials & Device Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute, Seongnam 13509, Korea

    ABSTRACT: High efficiency thin film solar cells require an absorber layer with high absorption and low defect, a transparent conductive

    oxide (TCO) film with high transmittance of over 80% and a high conductivity. Furthermore, light can be captured through the glass

    substrate and sent to the light absorbing layer to improve the efficiency. In this paper, morphology formation on the surface of glass

    substrate was investigated by using HF, mainly classified as random etching and periodic etching. We discussed about the etch

    mechanism, etch rate and hard mask materials, and periodic light trapping structure.

    Key words: Light trapping, Wet etching, Chemical, Hydrofluoric acid, Thin film, Solar cell

    *Corresponding author: [email protected]

    Received June 8, 2017; Revised June 14, 2017;

    Accepted August 15, 2017

    ⓒ 2017 by Korea Photovoltaic Society

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License

    (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)

    which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    75

  • H.S. Park et al. / Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017)76

    etchant types and hard mask layers discussed. Finally, application

    and conclusion described.

    2. The etch mechanism, etch rate, and glass

    types regarding random etching of glass

    by wet chemical

    2.1 The etching reaction; HF, HF/HCl, and HF/H2SO4

    (mechanism)

    For the etching of glasses, only hydrofluoric acid or other HF

    containing aqueous solutions used. The chemical reaction

    regarded as the following9):

    SiO2 + 6HF → 2H2O + H2SiF6 (1)

    This equation is a simplification of the reactions during the

    heterogeneous SiO2 dissolution as shown in Fig. 1 (a). HF is

    made up of the corrosive hydrogen ion (H+) and the toxic

    fluoride (F-), thereby acting in two ways (see picture above).

    The acid corrodes the glass surface and thus allows the toxic

    fluoride ion to penetrate the glass. Once in the glass, the fluoride

    ion binds themselves among others calcium and thus disturb the

    other chemical components of the glass10,11). Glassy SiO2 consists

    of tetragonal SiO4 units connected at all four corners to four

    other SiO4 units by covalent siloxane bonds12). It is necessary to

    break these bridging oxygen bonds to break down the network

    and release silicon from the glass. HF, dissolved in water, is a

    weak acid and its solutions containing, H+, F- and HF2- ions and

    un-dissociated HF molecules13). The dissolution of glassy SiO2

    is a heterogeneous reaction, which makes it difficult to study the

    mechanism governing the dissolution process. However, the

    breaking of all the chemical bonds, which results in eq. (1), will

    require several reaction steps. At first, glass reacts with HF

    forming silicon tetra-fluoride and water and SiF4 reacts with HF

    to form H2SiF6, which is not soluble in HF solutions.

    By adding to buffer acid agent such as HCl, HNO3, H3PO4

    and H2SO4 to HF solution, the concentration of the more

    reactive HF ion in the etchant is lowered, following equation (2)

    and (3)14).

    KHF

    H・F (2)

    KHF

    HF ・F (3)

    K1 = 6.74×10-4 mol/l, K2 = 0.26 mol/l

    (a)

    (b)

    Fig. 1. A schematic of glass etch mechanism based on (a) HF, and (b) HF/H2SO4

  • H.S. Park et al. / Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017) 77

    Only in etchants containing both HF and concentrated H2SO4

    were the etch rates higher than for HF/HCl or HF/HNO3 etchants,

    an effect which described to the formation of active fluorine-

    containing HSO3F acid. For further detailed information, the

    role of buffer acid etchant from HCl to H2SO4 presented as

    shown in Table 1.

    A higher HF concentration generates the by-product H2SiF6

    in the first reaction, and then the regeneration of the HF occurs

    after the second reaction with the H2SO4 during the etching

    process. The HF concentration continually maintained along

    with the sulfuric-acid changes, and this then continues with the

    increasing of the activation energy. The addition of H2SO4 is,

    therefore, effective for the increasing of the etch rate and the

    surface roughness. The HF-H2SO4 etching systems, an effect

    that ascribed to the formation of the strong fluorine-containing

    HSO3F acid15). From the etching of the surface, these surfaces

    are less smooth than the mechanically polished ones, meaning

    that it is possible to transform ground surfaces into optically

    transparent surfaces as shown in Fig. 1 (b).

    As mentioned above, the etch mechanism of HCl to HF is

    slightly different. Initially, the HF solution etches the glass and

    insoluble byproduct deposited on top of the glass surface. As the

    time goes on progressed, the size of insoluble byproducts

    becomes larger and accumulates to interfere with etching on the

    glass. However, HCl (other oxide series) releases impurities in

    HF-HCl mixed solutions [ref 16, JNN 2016 Park et al.]. Thus, it

    can be seen that the similar shape as the crater surface appears as

    shown in Fig. 2 (b).

    The etch rate of agitation of the solution is related to the

    adsorption or chemisorption on the siloxane bonds at the glass

    surface dominating the dissolution process. The etching mechanism,

    in particular, the role of the various fluorine-containing species,

    has studied in more detailed by many researchers for the etching

    rate8,15,17-19). Fluorine absorption complexes have observed at

    hydrated SiO2 surfaces in gaseous HF. It changed into a surface

    group such Si-F or Si-O-SiF3. The absorption of HF and HF2-

    increases the electronic density on the bridging oxygen more

    Table 1. The role of buffer acid etchant

    Etchant The role of buffer acid etchant

    HF

    1) Involved in the etch rate of glass: fluorine containing species

    2) Insoluble products generation as masking layers on glass substrate during etching: textured surface becomes rough and

    non-uniformities

    HCl

    1) Significantly reduced roughness of side wall

    : preventing the formation of alkaline earth fluorides with low solubility on the surface, the etching rate of HF+HCl etchant was not

    sufficiently stable & can transform insoluble products to become soluble.

    HNO31) Faster longitudinal etching rate

    : Due to the strong oxidability of HNO3 which facilitates the reaction between HF and glass

    H3PO4 Lower etching rate

    H2SO41) HF+H2SO4 etchants: the formation of the strong fluorine-containing HSO3F acid. By etching the surface, these surfaces are less

    smooth than mechanically polished ones; it is possible to transform ground surfaces into optically transparent surfaces.

    Fig. 2. A SEM images of etched surface as a function of etching

    solution (a) HF, (b) HF+HCl, and (c) HF+H2SO4

  • H.S. Park et al. / Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017)78

    basic, so more H+ ions are adsorbed, which leads to more

    siloxane bonds being broken per time units, for example a kind

    of catalytic effect. Determination of the etching rate is then the

    destruction of the siloxane bond by the plus action of the

    adsorbed species.

    The catalytic action of H+ ions on breaking siloxane bonds

    also occurs in the dissolution of glasses in acidic and weakly

    alkaline solution18). Methods for the decision of the etch rate of

    glasses are several ways as follows: The weight loss of dispersed

    powders, partially masking the surface of a glass body, e.g. a

    disk, by photoresist or wax. The etch rate for the glass is measured

    by monitoring the depth of the recessed etched region after

    etching of glass. It is slightly affected by agitation of the etchant

    from the rotation, stirring or ultrasonic.19)

    2.2 The surface morphology, etch rate, and the glass

    types for etching of glass

    Glass etching process not only removes surface products, but

    it also changed the surface morphology of the glass depending

    on the etching solution. When polished, the surface has slightly

    etched the surface roughens and verge-like structures. The

    experiment carried out to confirm the light trapping structure by

    varying the type of glass as shown in Fig. 2. Here, HF solution

    of ~50% was used as the glass etch solution and etch time is 10

    min. The Corning Eagle XG glass showed a smooth surface, while

    super-white glass had a severely rough surface and observed the

    texturing size of the tens to hundreds of μm. Although the same

    HF solution used, it showed the surface properties depending on

    the type of glass and related to the chemical composition of the

    glass.

    We investigated three kinds of glasses such as Corning Eagle

    XG, soda lime, super white to understand for the etching of glass.

    This table shows the chemical composition, optical properties

    and thermal resistance of glass as a representative three kinds of

    glasses. Silicon dioxide (SiO2) constitute more than fifty percent

    of total glass composition as shown in Table 1 and it included in

    calcium oxide (CaO) or sodium dioxide (Na2O) or aluminum

    oxide (Al2O3) according to the kinds of glasses20). In the case

    of optical properties, the transmittance is around 92% at the

    wavelength of 500 nm and around 8% for the reflectance.

    Corning Eagle XG glass is superior to the different things in

    quality for the thermal resistance of more 600oC. However,

    Corning Eagle XG glass cost per units was more expensive than

    other glass because of less dopant component in the glass.

    It shows that this formation is related to the presence of some

    products when etching of glass. Etched shape related size or

    depth is presenting after etching to large cracks formation by the

    products. Fig. 3 shows that the growth of product increased and

    this surface morphology is gradually changed into a verge as the

    etching process. This process indicates a size-up of fluorine

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    Fig. 3. Top view images of product size formed on a glass

    substrate by the etching treatment in, (a) 30 min, (b) 60

    min and (c) 90 min, respectively

  • H.S. Park et al. / Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017) 79

    products on the glass surface and a diffusion of fluorine species,

    which is related to the etching rate. Therefore, we have a

    conclusion that fluorine products play a crucial role in the

    macrocrack formation with random-etching without masking

    layers.

    Based on the facts mentioned above, it affects the glass

    texturing depending on the type of glass, composition ratio of

    the etching solution, temperature, and agitation. Fig. 4 shows

    that etch rates investigated according to various glass types, and

    HF 25% (volume ratio of DI:HF = 1:1) was fixed. The graph

    shows that the etch rate of the SiO2-based glass (Fused natural

    silica) substrate having a low impurity content lowered even

    though it is the same solution. It contained less impurities of the

    glass substrate, which reported in previous research groups21,22).

    3. Investigation of periodic textured glass

    morphology

    3.1 Glass etching and hard mask layer types

    So far, we have briefly discussed the random etching surface

    using wet chemical etchant. To solve this problem as per the

    previous subchapter, we are going to talk about wet etching with

    periodical pattern mask. It is a well-constructed periodic etched

    shape as referred in23). The Periodically patterned shape has

    various light trapping structures such as high aspect ratio, square

    type, honeycomb, hemisphere as shown in Fig. 7. We should

    take into consideration such as masking materials, adhesion

    between substrate and masking layers, masking layer height,

    and size, spacing, and shape of the pattern to have an optimized

    light trapping structure. It is related to make the light trapping

    structure on a glass substrate having mask pattern and etching

    solution.

    Fig. 5 presents the glass etching step (before etching ~ etch-4)

    for isotropic etching. This is possible for making a high aspect

    ratio structure according to specific etching step. It is crucial

    factor such as the concentration, time, and solution ratio of the

    etching for high aspect ratio structure, but they also depend on

    the characteristics of the mask layer material. We investigated

    regarding the effect on the hard mask material as shown in Fig. 6

    to improve the light trapping structure with the periodic

    pattern17). The photoresist (PR) is used as the most commonly

    used masking material in wet chemical etching. When the

    concentration of HF increases or deeper etch performed, it is Fig. 4. Etching rate comparison of various glass types in HF

    etchant solutions

    Fig. 5. A glass etching step using periodic pattern hard mask (a) before the etching, (b) etch-1, (c) etch-2, (d) etch-3, and (e) etch-4

    Fig. 6. A microscope images of micro etched surface based on various hard mask material

  • H.S. Park et al. / Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017)80

    easy to be penetrated by HF acid between the glass and PR.

    Metal is widely used to serve as the masking layer. For the

    Comparison to a photoresist, the HF molecules get absorbed

    inside the inherent pinholes and cause the enhanced defects on

    the glass surface. The Al–glass adhesion was still too weak to

    prevent the lateral HF penetration for long-time etch. The silicon-

    based thin film is another well-known inert material to HF, it

    shows excellent adhesion with the glass substrate, and more

    importantly, the surface of the silicon-based material is hydro-

    phobic14) which highly prevents the formation of surface pin

    holes and notching effect during the HF etch. This property

    implies that this masking material could be a good candidate for

    deeply fused silica etches.

    One of the process steps is checking for hardening the

    photoresist (PR)/HMDS solution, and the other is maintaining

    the etchant temperature during the etching. Masking layers are

    not only PR/HMDS but also different materials such as hydro-

    genated intrinsic amorphous silicon layer (i-a-Si:H) or silicon

    nitride (SiNx) by PECVD, metal mask like Al or Cr by the

    thermal evaporator (or sputtering), a thermal oxide (SiOx). All

    of masking materials excepting for PR/HMDS layers need to

    remove Metal or (SiNx or i-a-Si: H) with RIE or wet etching

    right after hard baking. However, and PR/sub-layers on the

    glass have excellent etching characteristics like a high aspect

    ratio, isotropic etching, selectivity and fast etching without a

    new process (RIE process).

    3.2 Wet etching parameters and light trapping structure

    Fig. 8 shows the light trapping structure for Etch-3 at

    different mask pattern from (2×2) to (15×2), which are based on

    wet etching.

    It consists of 2 types such as randomly textured surface

    without a pattern and periodically textured surface with the

    pattern. The textured surface used to be captured the light are

    based on the crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cell as a substrate and

    thin film silicon solar cell as superstrate or substrate as well. In

    Fig. 7. Investigation of etching effect using hard mask materials (Al, PR, a-Si, and SiNx)

    Fig. 8. A SEM images of light trapping structure (etch-3) and

    haze value with periodic mask pattern variation

  • H.S. Park et al. / Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017) 81

    the mask pattern, the spacing is fixed at 2 μm, and the size

    gradually increases. As the size increases, the etching height

    gradually increases. The increase in the etching height serves to

    capture the incident light and increase the light scattering effect.

    In this way, the haze ratio can be determined using a haze meter

    or integral sphere to determine the light scattering effect.

    The haze ratio value according to the mask pattern change is

    shown in Fig. 8. As shown in the figure, the mask pattern of

    (10×2) or more maintained an average haze ratio of 50% or more

    to the long wavelength region. However, using the same

    structure as in the figure, the haze ratio is more than 60%. This

    requires careful examination of various parameters such as

    height, spacing, and shape of the structure.

    4. Application and Conclusion

    Based on HF containing a solution, we used as a device

    application such as MEMS, biotechnology and photovoltaic

    based on HF glass etching to better the life. In this section, we

    have discussed the brief applications and concluded in our work.

    Glass etching process regarding the purpose of thin film solar

    cell applied satisfactorily when the textured glass surface is free

    from contaminants. The etching key point necessary to clean a

    glass surface depends strongly on the etching solution and

    concentration for the light trapping structure. This changed by

    alternating short time etching of glass substrate with HF/H2SO4

    without etching mask. Transforming smooth surface into optical

    light trapping morphology is possible.

    Although the reaction mechanism did not understood at this

    moment, we are available for the use of an industry if having

    satisfactory experiment results. HF solutions considered dangerous

    together with insoluble products. Therefore, it is of great im-

    portance to reduce the quality of the etchants used during the

    work and to develop methods to apply for the solar cell devices.

    For this work, it is replaced by dry etching on behalf of the wet

    etching to reduce the insoluble products. However, strong points

    of wet etching process are still better than that of dry etching

    because of a simple process, cost efficient and well-controlled

    the surface structures. Therefore, we will be interesting to see

    how the wet etching glass will be resolved.

    Acknowledgment

    This work was supported by the ‘New & Renewable Energy

    Core Technology Program’ of the Korea Institute of Energy

    Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) granted

    financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry &

    Energy, Republic of Korea (No. 20153010012090)

    References

    1. A. Shah, M. Vanecek, J. Meier, F. Meillaud, J. Guillet, D. Fischer,

    C. Droz, X. Niquille, S. Fay, E. Vallat-Sauvain, V. T. -Daudrix, and

    J. Bailat, “Basic Efficiency Limits, Recent Experiments Results

    and Novel Light-Trapping in a-Si:H, μc-Si:H and Micromorph

    Tandem Solar Cells”, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 639, (2004) 338.

    2. M. Jacoby, “The future of low-cost solar cells”, Chem. Eng. News

    94 (18), (2016) 30.

    3. O. Isabella, J. Krč, and M. Zeman, “Modulated surface textures for

    enhanced light trapping in thin-film silicon solar cells”, Appl.

    Phys. Lett. 97, (2010) 10110.

    4. X. Yan, S. Venkataraj, and A. G. Aberle, “Modulated surface

    texturing of Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide (AZ)) Transparent

    Conductive Oxides for Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells”, Energy

    Procedia 33, (2013) 157.

    5. W. Zhang, U. W. Paetzold, M. Meier, A. Gordijn, J. Hüpkes, and

    T. Merdzhanova, “Thin-film Silicon Solar Cells on Dry Etched

    Textured Glass”, Energy Procedia 44, (2014) 151.

    6. R. Sahin and I. Kabacelik, “Nanostructuring of ITO thin films

    through femtosecond laser ablation”, Appl. Phys. A 122, (2016)

    314.

    7. F. M. Ezz-Eldin, T. D. Abd-Elaziz, and N. A. Elalaily, “Effect of

    dilute HF solutions on chemical, optical, and mechanical properties

    of soda-lime-silica glass”, J. Mater. Sci. 45, (2010) 5937.

    8. A. B. Burg, in “Fluorine chemistry”, Vol. 1, edited by J. H. Simons

    (Academic Press, New York, USA, 1950) p. 180.

    9. D.J. Monk, D.S. Soane, and R.T. Howe, Solid-State Sensor and

    Actuator Workshop, “A diffusion/chemical reaction model for HF

    etching of LPCVD phosphosilicate glass sacrificial layers”, (1992)

    5th Technical Digest, IEEE Hilton Head Island, SC, USA.

    10. H. Zhu, M. Holl, T. Ray, S. Bhushan, and D. R Meldrum, “Cha-

    racterization of deep wet etching of fused silica glass for single cell

    and optical sensor deposition”, J. Micromech. Microeng. 19, (2009)

    065013.

    11. H. Nielsen and D. Hackleman, “Some Illumination on the Mechanism

    of SiO2 Etching in HF solutions”, J. Electrochem, Soc.; Solid-State

    Sci. and Techno. 130, (1983) 708.

    12. A. Mitra and J. D. Rimstidt, “Solubility and dissolution rate of

    silica in acid fluoride solutions”, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Act

    73, (2009) 7045.

    13. C. Iliescu, “Wet etching of glass for MEMS application”, Romanian

    J. Inform. Sci. Techno. 9 (4), (2006) 285.

    14. G. A. C. M. Spierings, “Wet chemical etching of silicate glasses in

    hydrofluoric acid based solutions”, J. Mater. Sci. 28, (1993) 6261.

    15. G. A. C. M. Spierings and J. Van Dijk, “The dissolution of Na2O-

  • H.S. Park et al. / Current Photovoltaic Research 5(3) 75-82 (2017)82

    MgO-CaO-SiO2 glass in aqueous HF solutions”, J. Mater. Sci. 22,

    (1987) 1869.

    16. H. S. Park, S.-H. Nam, M. H. Shin, M. K. Ju, Y.-J. Lee, J.-H Yu, J.

    H. Jung, S. B. Kim, S. H. Ahn, J.-H. Boo, and J. Yi, “Method for

    Fabricating Textured High-Haze ZnO:Al Transparent Conduction

    Oxide Films on Chemically Etched Glass Substrates”, J. Nanosci.

    Nanotechno. 16, (2016) 4886.

    17. K. Tsujino, S. Imai, C. -L. Lee, M. Matsumura, and S. Mizushima,

    “Local wet etching of glasses by acidification utilizing electro-

    chemistry”, J. Micromech. Microeng. 18, (2008) 115023.

    18. C. Iliescu, J. Jing, Francis E.H. Tay, J. Miao, and T. Sun, “Strategies

    in deep wet etching of Pyrex glass”, Surf. Coat. Techno. 198,

    (2005) 314.

    19. A. J. Muscat, A. G. Thorsness, and G. M. Miranda, “Characterization

    of residues formed by anhydrous hydrogen fluoride etching of

    doped oxides”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 19 (4), (2001) 1854.

    20. H. S. Park, J.-S. Jeong, M. H. Shin, S. B. Kim, and J. Yi, “Current

    status of light trapping in module cover glass for PV module,”

    Current Photovolt Research 4 (3), (2016) 119.

    21. H. Kikuyama, M. Waki, I. Kawanabe, M. Miyashita, T. Yabune,

    and N. Miki, J. Takano, and T. Ohmi, “Etching Rate and Mechanism

    of Doped Oxide in Buffered Hydrogen Fluoride Solution”, J.

    Electrochem. Soc. 139 (8), (1992) 2239.

    22. J. Liu, N. I. Nemchuk, D. G. Ast, and J. G. Couillard, “Etch rate and

    surface morphology of plasma etched glass and glass-ceramic

    substrates”, J. Non-Cryst Sol. 342, (2004) 110.

    23. S. J. Bong, S. H. Ahn, Le H. T. Anh, S. B. Kim, H. S. Park, C. H.

    Shin, J. J. Park, Y. -J. Lee, and J. Yi, “Effective Light Trapping

    in Thin Film Silicon Solar Cells with Nano- and Microscale

    Structures on Glass Substrate”, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16,

    (2016) 4978.