Assessment Tools & Strategies Language Proficiency Assessment
A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education
description
Transcript of A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education
![Page 1: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A REVIEW OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS
FOR SERVICE-LEARNING IN HIGHER
EDUCATION
![Page 2: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Furco Focus HistoryImplementationEvaluationA to F
![Page 3: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Self-Assessment Rubric for the Institutionalization of Service-Learning in Higher Education (a.k.a. FURCO)The original rubric is based on a worksheet developed by Kecskes and Muyllaert (1997) and was first published and piloted in 1998. Revised in 1999 and 2002.Other key contributors include: A. Driscoll, B. Holland, B. Jacoby, and E. Zlotkowski
Some History
![Page 4: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Midwest Consortium 2003 modification
-numerical phases added (1-9).
In 2009, D. Pawlowski collected FURCO data from 25 Midwest Consortium institutional members beginning with 2003-2007/2009.
Some History
![Page 5: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Dimensions
I. Philosophy and Mission of Service-Learning
II. Faculty support for and involvement in S-L
III. Student support for….
IV. Community participation and partnership
V. Institutional support
ComponentsDefinition of S-L, Strategic
Plan, Alignment with Mission Alignment with Ed. reformFaculty awareness,
involvement, leadership, incentives
Student awareness, opportunities….
Community awareness, mutual understanding, voice
Coordinating office, staffing, funding, support, assessment
FIVE DIMENSIONS AND RESPECTIVE COMPONENTS
![Page 6: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
QUESTIONS
What is the Furco?A pedagogically recognized tool/a collective goal/evidence based (qualitative and quantitative) measureWho completed the assessment- Faculty/Staff, Adm. etc.
Collects the data/analyzes How to complete the assessment -Provide instructions -Develop procedures -Results When- Annually
![Page 7: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Why should you consider assessment
- Provide opportunities for discussion about strengths and weaknesses
- A-F
Where do we go from here -Provide feedback -Additional data needed -Action plan
QUESTIONS
![Page 8: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SurveysSocial MediaOrientationsConsultations/InterviewsWorkshopsAdvisory CommitteeAdmissions and AlumnaeNational Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Recognitions
OTHER FORMS OF ASSESSMENT
![Page 9: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Is assessment worth it?
Resources-Literature Driscoll, B. Holland, S. Gelmon, S. Kerrigan (1996)“culture of evidence” -Practitioners-NECC
Closing Commentsand Continuing Challenges
![Page 10: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Data trends suggested that over time the dimension scores had upward (1-9 range) improvement.
The lowest dimension overall was student participation when data was aggregated. Although, at least five institutions had quality building participatory scores for students. Scores above the range of 5 or above, consistently over seven years (i.e. Hastings, Nebraska Methodist, UNL ,UNO, and Wayne State).
Other institutions showed consistently high scores in dimension 4 = community (i.e. Iowa western, UNK, UNL, UNO and NE Medical Center)
And all but one above scored high as well, on dimension 5= institution.
LESSONS FROM PAWLOWSKI
![Page 11: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
IMPLICATIONS AND FUTURE PAWLOWSKI DATA
Some large variations in numbers with some institutions; is this really a difference in the S-L between institutions or just in the interpretation in how individuals are evaluating Furco?
Furco is a great tool for assessment, if utilized consistentlyQualitative data will help provide more information
Those institutions that have great strengths in particular areas would be great role models/spokespersons for other institutions (or their administrators)Focus on student participation; assessment from students can help drive institutional support
![Page 12: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Driscoll A., Holland, B., Gelmon, S., Kerrigan, S. (1996) An Assessment model for service-learning: comprehensive case studies of impact on faculty, students, community, and institution. Michigan Journal for service-Learning.
Furco, A. (2002). Self-Assessment Rubric for the institutionalization of service-learning in higher education. University of California, Berkeley.
Gelmon, S. (2000). Challenges in assessing service-learning.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning.
N.A . Self-assessment tool for service-learning sustainabil ity.Community-Campus Partnerships for Health.
Karlen, J. , Nelson. L., (2009). FURCO Document procedures. Wayne State College Service-Learning.
Pawlowski, D. (2010) Analysis of consortium perceptions: Quantitative reflections of the Furco instrument. Midwest Consortium for Service-Learning in Higher Education 2010 Learn and Serve Grant Report.
REFERENCES
![Page 13: A Review of Assessment Tools for Service-Learning in Higher Education](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081512/568163d5550346895dd523db/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Thank You