A Radiation Protection Perspective- … Documents...A Radiation Protection Perspective-...
Transcript of A Radiation Protection Perspective- … Documents...A Radiation Protection Perspective-...
A Radiation Protection Perspective-
Decommissioning of the Moata Reactor
Biological Shield Dismantling
Australian Nuclear Science &
Technology Organisation
IAEA Workshop (R2D2) – Sydney Australia
7th-11th May 2012
Shutdown & Decommissioning
Two phases of dismantling:
– Preliminary Dismantling – the removal of the internal components of the reactor, including the steel core structures, graphite moderator and beam line facilities
– Structural (Biological Shield) Dismantling – the cutting and removal of the concrete shielding and the floor area below the shielding.
1995 1996 1997 1998 2009 2010
Structural (Biological Shield) Dismantling
Structural (Biological Shield) Dismantling
• Reactor housed in a building used for
other operational task
• A containment tent with HEPA filtered
extraction system built around the
reactor
Getting There…
The steps involved in planning, completing and evaluating the
success of the Biological shield Dismantling:
– Radiation Protection Plan
• Characterisation
• Radiation Management & Monitoring
• Dose Estimation & Constraints
• Personal Protective Equipment
• Final Status Surveys
– Outcomes & Lessons Learnt
Characterisation – Survey
• A radiological survey was carried out to determine
the dose rates within the empty cavity areas.
• The data from this exercise was used to prepare a
dose estimate for the Biological shield dismantling.
• This helped us estimate the maximum individual
and collective dose for this part of the project.
Measured dose rates ranged from 7-4000 Sv/hr
Dose Estimation and Constraints
TASK SET 2
Main Bioshield (Heavy Density Concrete)
Active Zone
Estimated time to
perform task
Est. Exp Time
(hours) for most
exposed
individual
Estimated Doserate
(µSv/hr) for Worker
1,2,3 or 4
Estimated Dose
Received (µSv) Worker
1-Cardinal
Estimated Dose
Received (µSv) Worker
2-Cardinal
Estimated Dose
Received (µSv) for
Worker 3-Cardinal
Estimated Dose
Received (µSv) for
Worker 4-Cardinal
Estimated Doserate
(µSv/hr) for HPS 1
Estimated Dose
Received (µSv) HPS
1
Estimated
Collective dose
man- Sv
Machine demolition-Remote operation 24 12 70 840 840
HPS Monitoring surveys 8 8 70 560
Bobcat waste removal 8 4 130 520 520
Material removal with 5tonne excavator 16 8 70 560
Manual filling of waste containers 1 0.5 300 150
Total For Cutting and Removal Of Main
Bioshield (Active concrete) 57 840 840 520 1230 560
Summary Dose = 840 840 520 1230 560 3990
Dose Estimates:
• Collective – 10,400 man-μSv
• Av. Individual – 1156μSv (assuming 9 workers)
• Max. Individual – 1444μSv
Dose Constraints:
• Individual – 1500μSv
• Daily – 50μSv
Radiation Management &
Monitoring Controlling exposure using distance
Radiation Management & Monitoring Controlling exposure using shielding
Steel Plates for shielding
Radiation Management & Monitoring Controlling exposure using shielding
Shielded containers for
activated waste:
– Specially designed
6mm steel boxes for
active concrete
Radiation Management & Monitoring
Dose Management:
– Radiological
surveys
Dose Monitoring:
– EPD System
– TLDs
– Whole Body
Monitoring
Radiation Management & Monitoring
• External gamma monitors
and air samplers were
placed close to work areas.
• Barrier and exit monitoring
equipment were used to
ensure that no
contamination was taken
out of the classified areas.
Personal Protective Equipment • Since there was a high potential of
generating dust while cutting and
demolishing the active concrete it was
decided to start from the highest level
of PPE which included ;
Respiratory protection with
particulate cartridge)
Tyveks
Overshoes and gloves
• This was than downgraded as we
gained operational understanding of the project risks.
Final Status Survey
• Dose rate surveys were carried out on marked survey points (grid survey)
• Acceptance criteria of 0.5uSv/hr was met to ensure a brown-field condition was met
• Samples were taken in and around the foundations of the reactor and analysed for activity.
• The following guides were also used to determine the exemption and clearance criteria for the site
IAEA No. RS-G.1.7
ARPANSA Reg 1999, Schedule 2, Part 2
Outcomes & Lessons Learnt
– Estimated doses vs. actual doses:
Dose ANSTO
Estimated
ARPANSA
Constraint
ANSTO
Constraint Actual
Collective 10,400 person-
μSv
13,000 person-
μSv
10,400 person-
μSv
1,679 person-
μSv
Max.
Individual 1444 μSv 1750 μSv 1500 μSv 252 μSv
Daily - - 50μSv 46μSv (max)
Outcomes & Lessons Learnt • From a radiation protection perspective the Biological Shield
Dismantling was completed safely and without incident.
– Dose estimates were higher than those recorded by staff.
This was attributed to being overly conservative and some
of the contributing factors were;
• Self shielding by the dismantled concrete
• Time taken to dismantle and remove the active concrete was
less than anticipated.
– No surface or airborne contamination was detected
throughout the project
– There were no personal contamination events