A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee
-
Upload
brian-collins -
Category
Documents
-
view
28 -
download
2
description
Transcript of A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee
![Page 1: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A proposal for changingIPv6 per address fee
Izumi OkutaniJapan Network Information
CenterNIR SIG@APNIC 18, Fiji
31 August – 3 September, 2004
![Page 2: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
This presentation proposes to revise a
method of calculating IPv6 per address
fee in order to abolish duplicate fees charged for the same address range
![Page 3: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Background
The current fee schedule leads to charging IPv6 per address fee for the whole prefix when receiving contiguous range from the previous allocation
![Page 4: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Current IPv6 per address fee(APNIC-081)
3.4.3 IPv6 address space----------------For an allocation of IPv6 address space, the total per-address fee is calculated for the prefix allocated according to the number of addresses which should be utilised according to an HD-Ratio of 0.80.
(snip..)
In the case of an allocation which includes a previously allocated block of addresses, the total fee calculation is based on the size of the prefix allocated, regardless of the previous allocation.
![Page 5: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Current IPv6 per address feeCase Study
New allocationCharged
New allocation (/32)Charged(/31)
Charged(/30)
/32
/31
Paid(/32)Paid (/32)*2 New allocation(/31)
/30
Paid(/32)
Initial allocation (/32) : 7,132 x per address fee Second allocation (/32, /31 in total) : 12,417 x per address fee Third allocation (/31, /30 in total) : 21,619 x per address fee------------------------------------------------------------------- Fee total : 78,809 x per address fee
Initial allocation (/30) : 21,619 x per address fee------------------------------------------------------------------- Fee total : 21,619 x per address fee
Case-1 : /32 initially, upgrade to /31, then to /30
Case-2 : /30 initial allocation
![Page 6: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Problem
Current fee calculation scheme is “redundant”, charging to the address space which had previously been charged
Conservative, or small/medium ISPs must pay more fee in total
JPNIC is not able to provide a reasonable explanation to our members
![Page 7: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Proposal
Define IPv6 per address fee so that it only charges for the ranges which had been additionally allocated, regardless of contiguous range
![Page 8: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Proposed description of APNIC-081
3.4.3 IPv6 address space----------------…In the case of an allocation which includes a previously allocated block of addresses, the total fee calculation is based on the difference of the number of /48s corresponding to HD-ratio 0.8, between the previous allocation and the new allocation.
For example, the total per-address fee payable for an allocation of /30 including previous /32 allocation to a Very Large member is calculated as:
(21,619 - 7,132) x $ 0.03 = $ 434.61
![Page 9: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Proposed fee scheme
P 48-P Total /48s Threshold Util%
32 16 65536 7132 10.90%31 17 131072 12417 9.50%30 18 262144 21619 8.20%
7. Appendix A: HD-Ratio“IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy”
/32 to /31(12,417 - 7,132) x per address fee
/31 to /30(21,619 - 12,417) x per address fee
/32 to /29(37,641 - 7,132) x per address fee
![Page 10: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Proposed Fee SchemeCase Study
New allocationCharged
New allocation (/32)Charged(/31)
Charged(/30)
/32
/31
Paid(/31) New allocation(/31)
Paid(/32)
Case-1 : /32 initially, upgrade to /31, then to /30
Case-2 : /30 initial allocation
/30
Initial allocation (/32) : 7,132 x per address fee Second allocation (/31 in total) : (12,417-7,132) x per address fee Third allocation (/30 in total) : (21,619-12,417) x per address fee------------------------------------------------------------------- Fee total : 21,619 x per address fee
Initial allocation (/30) : 21,619 x per address fee------------------------------------------------------------------- Fee total : 21,619 x per address fee
Same result!
![Page 11: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Effect
NIRs will no longer need to pay duplicate per address fee
APNIC's operational expense ?
![Page 12: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Implementation
Proposed timeframe 3months after EC endorsement
(normal timeframe)
Documents to be changed APNIC-081 “member-fee-schedule”
![Page 13: A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/5681329d550346895d993b89/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Questions?