A Pilot Study of SGEA Institutions · Medical Students’ Health and Wellness: A Pilot Study of...
Transcript of A Pilot Study of SGEA Institutions · Medical Students’ Health and Wellness: A Pilot Study of...
![Page 1: A Pilot Study of SGEA Institutions · Medical Students’ Health and Wellness: A Pilot Study of SGEA Institutions Krishna Vyas, MHS1, Terry Stratton, PhD1, Patrick Bonasso2, Emily](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081615/5fe2ecdb9e892b3abb5da559/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Medical Students’ Health and Wellness: A Pilot Study of SGEA Institutions
Krishna Vyas, MHS1, Terry Stratton, PhD1, Patrick Bonasso2, Emily Nease, MD2, Vandra Harris3, Sneha Pampati3,
Michael Rowland, MA, PhD3, Supria Batra4, Todd Gress, MD, MPH4, Neelkamal Soares, MD1
1University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 2West Virginia University School of Medicine, 3University of Louisville School of Medicine, 4Marshall University School of Medicine
BACKGROUND
Personal health and wellness are consistent predictors of illness prevention,
and hallmarks of a healthy lifestyle that should, ideally, be cultivated during
medical training. Ironically, however, the literature suggests that medical
students actually have a higher prevalence of psychological distress when
compared to the general population of age-matched peers. Similarly, several
studies have shown that burnout, depression, anxiety, and stress are prevalent
among medical students. Clearly, health and wellness perceptions and
practices among medical students represents a timely and important topic.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
In our study, we explore students’ perceptions of their own health, including
diet, exercise, stress, sleep habits and awareness of wellness resources – and
examine these trends across the training continuum.
METHODS
From February to April 2012, a cross-sectional survey was conducted of M1-
M4 medical students at four SGEA institutions: Marshall University,
University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and West Virginia
University.
An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was used to gather data on:
(1) student demographics; (2) diet; (3) exercise; (4) sleep; (5) work-life
balance; (6) stress; and (7) awareness and access to support services.
Instruments used (with permission) included the Maslach Burnout Inventory,
Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and a modified Perceived Stress Scale (i.e.,
students were asked to evaluate variables, such as pressures at school, that
made them “feel stressed”).
A link to online survey was sent via e-mail (with two follow-up reminders) to
potential respondents by their respective Offices of Student Affairs. IRB
approval for this study protocol was garnered from all participating
institutions.
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 20.0 was used to
analyze the data. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant
for all inferential analyses. Students graduating after 2015 (n=9) were
excluded from all analyses.
A total of 619 of 1847 electronic forms were received for an overall response
rate of 33.5% Male and female respondents were roughly equivalent - 47.0%
and 53.0%, respectively. Respondents’ ages ranged from 20-43, with a mean of
25.11 ± 2.53. Current academic standing varied as follows: M1 (27.2%), M2
(29.9%), M3 (22.8%), M4 (18.5%).
EXERCISE
SLEEP
RESULTS RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS
Although most medical students perceive their diet, exercise, and sleep
habits to be relatively healthy, there was a tendency for first-year (M1)
students’ diet to be significantly more unhealthy – and for fourth-year
students’ (M4) perceived stress levels to be significantly lower. There
was no difference related to exercise or sleep.
Ongoing data analysis will help guide institutions in their efforts to
improve overall health and wellness education among medical students.
Lastly, the collaborative process demonstrated in this study suggests that
medical students can, during their training, develop and execute research
projects that are manageable, rigorous, and of potential benefit to
numerous stakeholders.
SLEEP
STRESS
The project described was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant UL1RR033173. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
DIET 1 (very unhealthy) to 4 (very healthy)
Source: https://www.mededportal.org/icollaborative/resource/332