A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

47
A Phenomenology of Human-Electricity Relations James Pierce, Eric Paulos CMU, HCII

description

This paper investigates the philosophical question of how we can experience energy with the aim of informing the design of future ways of experiencing energy by means of technology. Four human-technology relations formulated by philosopher of technology Don Ihde are presented. Each is then developed in the context of electrical interactive technologies. In conclusion these human-electricity and human-technology relations are employed in order to interpret current work related to energy and sustainability within HCI and point to future work in these areas.

Transcript of A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Page 1: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

A Phenomenology of Human-Electricity Relations

James Pierce, Eric PaulosCMU, HCII

Page 2: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

In what ways can we experience energy?

Page 3: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

In what ways can we experience the presence of electrical energy?

Page 4: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

How can we design future ways of using & experiencing energy?

Page 5: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Philosophy of technology

Page 6: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Philosophy of technology >> Don Ihde

Page 7: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.

Don Ihde >> Human-technology relations

Page 8: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

4 Human-technology relations:

embodiment - hermeneutic - alterity - background

Page 9: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

embodimentready-to-hand present-at-hand

hermeneutic alterity

[ background ]

Page 10: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

A “partial symbiosis” of human and technologyEmbodiment relations

Page 11: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 12: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

A relation through a technology

Page 13: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

“semi-opaque” connection between the technology and referentHermeneutic relations

Page 14: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

120

100

80

60

40

20

20

40

30

20

10

10

20

30

40

50

0

40

0

F C

Page 15: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

A relation with technology

120

100

80

60

40

20

20

40

30

20

10

10

20

30

40

50

0

40

0

F C

Page 16: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Alterity relationsA relation to a “technology other”

Page 17: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 18: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

A relation to technology

Page 19: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Background relationsA “present absence” of technology

Page 20: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 21: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Electricity as a background technology

Page 22: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Human-electricity relations

Page 23: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

“the ratio of the objectness of the technology

and its transparency in use”.

Page 24: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 25: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Embodiment relations through electricity

Page 26: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Embodiment relations through electricity to that electricity

Page 27: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Hermeneutic relations with electricity

Page 28: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

7%

Hermeneutic relations with electricity to that electricity

Page 29: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Hermeneutic relations with electricity to other electricity

MODE

Watts

Page 30: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Alterity relations to electricity

Page 31: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Alterity relations to electricity

Pierce, J. & Paulos, E. (2010). Materializing energy. DIS ‘10.

Pierce, J. & Paulos, E. (2010). Designing for emotional attachment to energy. Design & Emotion ‘10.

Page 32: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Relations through, with and to electricity

MODE

Watts

Page 33: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Thanks!

James Pierce | [email protected]

Page 34: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 35: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 36: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 37: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 38: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 39: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 40: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 41: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 42: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 43: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 44: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 45: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 46: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations
Page 47: A phenomenology of human-electricity relations

Hermeneutic relations without electricity to other electricity