A P RIMER FOR P ROMOTION 2013-2014 Jess W Everett Chair, All-University Senate Promotion Committee...
-
Upload
ethelbert-shepherd -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of A P RIMER FOR P ROMOTION 2013-2014 Jess W Everett Chair, All-University Senate Promotion Committee...
A PRIMER FOR PROMOTION2013-2014
Jess W Everett
Chair, All-University Senate Promotion Committee
(Adapted from presentation of Barbara Bole Williams)
PROMOTION MOA
Read it! www.rowan.edu/president/senate/committees/index.cfm?id=
29
2
2013-2014 SCHEDULE (SENATE MOA FOR OFFICIAL) Oct 15 - Intent to Apply form Nov 1 - Department Committees Nov 1 - External Evaluator Names
Department & Dean Dec 1 - College Committees Jan 15 - External Evaluator Assessments Jan 15 - Submit Application to Department (Committee) Chair Feb 1 - Department Committee Done March 1 - College Committee Done Feb 28 - One copy to Senate April 1 – Senate Committee & Deans Done May 1 - Provost Done June 1 - President Done June - Trustees Done
3
PROMOTION - PROFICIENCY IN
Teaching Effectiveness Scholarly and Creative Activity Contribution to University Community Contribution to Wider & Professional
Community
Defined in MOA Appendix A Also refer to department/
college Promotion document
4
YOUR APPLICATION
Describes your experiences as a teacher, scholar, & professional
Makes compelling argument for what you do Clearly shows how you met benchmarks
5
APPLICANT Write letter to Department chair Sign intention to apply form
(Office of Provost) Complete promotion application
MOA Appendix
Candidates for full professor Only Provide names of 2 external evaluators to
Department & Dean CV for each evaluator
Exception: College of Engineering: Associate too!
6
Develop portfolio organized according to promotion checklist Portfolio contents
MOA 5.2 Checklist
MOA Appendix G Seven (7) copies
MOA 5.34411
APPLICANT
7
DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES (5.3) Department Purpose Statement Promotion Standards Balance (Weight)
Teaching Effectiveness Scholarship and Creative Activity Contribution to University Community Contribution to Wider &
Professional Community Schedule for evaluation
Review standards and procedures periodically Approved by College Deans and Provost
8
DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES (CONT.) Faculty evaluation
Plans, standards, criteria, procedures New faculty orientation In-House Costs Optional Development Plans
9
DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES (CONT.) Department Promotion Committee schedules
interview with applicant to review portfolio DPC evaluate portfolio and vote
Point system optional
DPC decides FAVORABLE DPC inform applicant and
forward written report to College Promotion Committee (CPC)
Candidate 7 copies of portfolio (w/ DPC report & candidate response)to chair of College Promotion Committee
Candidate Supplementary materials (optional) – 1 copy
10
DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES (CONT.) DPC decides UNFAVORABLE
Written explanation provided, including how candidate does not meet the criteria
At request of candidate, meeting scheduled to discuss
Applicant can withdraw application or ask to have materials forwarded to CPC
See MOA 5.344 for details
11
COLLEGE PROMOTION COMMITTEE Composition and election of CPC
Senate Promotion Committee runs elections for most CPC s
Role of CPCReview DPC recommendation and evaluate
applicant’s qualificationConduct interview with applicantVote on applicant’s request for promotionForward recommendation (Chair of DPC)
College Dean University Senate Promotion Committee (USPC)
12
COLLEGE PROMOTION COMMITTEE (CONT.) Chair CPC 1 copy to SPC
Unless Candidate requests review by UPC (6 copies)
Chair CPC 1 copy to Dean w/ supplemental
Chair SPC 1 copy to Provost
Exceptions: Mixed
Chair CPC 6 copies to UPC for review (automatic)
Unfavorable (Unanimous or mixed) Candidate may withdraw, no copies sent 13
COLLEGE DEAN Review DPC & CPC recommendations,
rationales and Applicant portfolio Meet with applicant Forward recommendation to
candidate, DPC & CPC If Negative, applicant may
Withdraw from further consideration, or Appeal negative recommendation by advancing
application to Provost Positive
recommendation Automatic advance
to Provost14
UNIVERSITY SENATE PROMOTION COMMITTEE Members from each College Chair elected by Senate Conduct and supervise election of
College Committees Receive, retain and review all
applicants who received negative recommendations or mixed votes and/or who request a reviewDetermine whether procedures were
followed by previous committeesCertify to provost that procedures
followedForward portfolios to Provost
15
ADMINISTRATION Provost and President is “largely procedural”,
but can (and do) conduct substantive reviews
Provost review portfolios and makes recommendations to President
Copies of recommendations provided to the candidate If not recommended , candidate may
withdraw request materials forwarded to President for further
consideration President considers Provost recommendation
and informs candidate of his/her decision Candidates or chairs of any promotion
committee can request meeting 16
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Recommendations considered by BOT at June meeting
Promotion takes effect following September
17
TIPS FOR DEPARTMENTS
Guidance in early years to support Candidate’s development
Thorough, honest, direct review to Candidate Give Candidate things to think about, reflect
upon, and grow from (things Candidate can write about)
Suggestion improvements & give constructive criticism
Peer observations, use department criteria (not just 1-pg summary)
18
SAMPLE CRITERIA FOR PEER OBSERVATION
Good organization of subject matter Appropriate pacing Adherence to departmental
syllabi & policies Effective communication Knowledge and enthusiasm for
subject matter & teaching Positive attitudes toward students Fairness in examinations and grading Flexibility in approaches to teaching Appropriate student learning outcomes 19
CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION
University-wide Criteria: Defined by the collective bargaining agreement and summarized at both the Provost’s and Senate’s websites: www.rowan.edu/provost/aft/ www.rowan.edu/president/senate/
Departmental Criteria: Each Department approves promotion criteria, interpreting common university criteria in own department
Due dates: See MOA20
CONTENTS OF A FOLDER (SEE PROMOTION MOA) Complete Checklist with page numbers Departmental info
Terminal degree Departmental interpretation and weighting of
evaluation criteria Role of Dept Chair
RU personnel resume (basic vita) Candidate’s self-assessment of professional
performance Plans for future professional growth Student evaluations and peer observations,
and candidate’s responses
21
CONTENTS OF A FOLDER (SEE PROMOTION MOA) Assessment of teaching effectiveness Evaluation letter from approved External
Evaluator Full Professor only!
Departmental evaluation of Prof Performance Committee recommendation Numerical vote Names & signatures of committee members and
chair Copy of recent evaluation of Dept
Committee, University Senate Committee, Dean, Provost and President
Supplemental folder (optional)22
FREQUENT CONCERNS Sloppiness, lack of organization,
missing page numbers Show pride in work
Poor Candidate reflection Poor Candidate response to student
evaluations and peer observations Provide thorough self-reflection &
explanations Missing signatures and/or dates Missing copies of evaluations from
previous review cycles Include recent reviews at back of current folder
and others in Supplemental Folder 23
DOUBLE CHECK FOLDER
MOA checklist Initialed by DPC Chair
Consecutive page numbers Self-appraisal signed and dated by Candidate Student evals signed and dated by
Administrator or DPC Chair Peer observations signed and dated by
Observer and Candidate Dept Eval signed and dated by all DPC
members and Candidate24
TIPS FOR CANDIDATES
Print Double-Sided Check and double-check
file organization Have proof-reader check spelling and
grammar If inserting pages at the last minute, use
letters with numbers (14, 14A, 15, etc) Use tabs to divide sections of folder Make sure all pages of Original Folder are
copied 25
TIPS FOR CANDIDATES (CONT.) Carefully read MOA and checklist Know your Department guidelines Make a strong case
prove deserving of financial commitment from university
show pride in work Keep and include all evaluations and letters
from DPC, USPC, Dean, Provost, and President
Keep and include student evaluations and peer observations
26
TIPS FOR CANDIDATES (CONT.)
Thorough self-reflection, explanation, and documentation of work and growth in all 4 areas
If planning to use your T&R folder also for Promotion in the year you apply for tenure (Year 5), state such in your T&R folder and follow the guidelines for each of the four areas in the Promotion Memorandum of Agreement T&R and Promotion are two separate processes,
but you may use the same application folder (beginning AY 2009-10) 27
T&R Prom.
MODIFICATION FROM T&R TO PROMOTION KEYED TO CHECKLIST
Same information, different organization
Table of Contents will differ
Be sure to follow the respective Checklists
Update information between T&R folio due date and Promotion folio due date
28
TIPS FOR CANDIDATES (CONT.)
Consider providing a 2-5 page “executive summary” of highlights of accomplishments (esp since most recent previous review) at front of folder
Do not leave anything open for questioning by multiple reviewers outside your Department Respond to any and all issues raised in review
letters from most recent previous review cycle Clearly indicate dates of accomplishments Do not double count
29
TIPS FOR CANDIDATES (CONT.) Clearly describe accomplishments
Authorship List authors / principle investigators in order of article or
proposal Journal articles, chapters or books
What was your role? How good is the Journal or Publisher? Why is it a good article, chapter or book?
Conference articles In the proceedings? Acceptance based on abstract or paper?
Grants Include: Principle Investigators, Title, Funding Agency, $
amount, Years & Status Status – Pending, Declined, Funded
30
TIPS FOR CANDIDATES (CONT.)
Include blank student evaluation form in folder include questions that students responded to so
student feedback can be interpreted by reviewers outside your Department
Explain the scoring of the student evaluations Range (0-4 ? 1-5?) Value (5=poor? 5=excellent?)
Create table summarizing student evals with dates and classes by semester
31
TIPS FOR CANDIDATES (CONT.)
Put supporting material in Supplemental File Table of Contents Tabs Page numbers
Include any evaluations not in the Promotion folder in Supplemental File
32
WHERE TO GO FOR HELP
Department Promotion Committee members
Faculty Center Director: Deb Martin [email protected] 3rd Floor James Hall
Mentoring Sample documents Organization Teaching tips 33
WHERE TO GO FOR HELP (CONT.)
Senate website Faculty Promotion MOA &tips available for
download www.rowan.edu/president/senate/
Check website for Promotion tips and documents Provost website -
http://www.rowan.edu/provost/aft/ Chair of Senate Promotion Cmte:
Jess Everett ([email protected])
34