A nonlinear instrument diaphragm - NIST · acceptable linear range was from - 25 to + 25 dlcm 2 and...

5
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Vol. 58, No. 6, June 1957 Research Paper 2766 A Nonlinear Instrument Diaphragm Fidel Cordero, Harry Matheson, and Daniel P. Johnson D etai ls of fabrication for t he produ ct i on of sensitive diaphragms having a contro ll ed non lin ear press ure-d e fl ect i on char acteri st ic arc pre sen ted . Th e desired characte ri s t ic was such that wh en the di a phragm formed one plate of a condenser in the fr eq u cncy-contro ll ing ne twork of a \ Vien-bridg e oscill ator, the re s ul ting presslire-frequcncy t ran sfer charact e ri s tic would be lin ear between -3 0 and + 30 d ynes pCI' sq uar e centimeter. Typical transf er curves ar e s hown . 1. Introduction Th e diaphragm descri bed herein was requir ed to bave a deflection versus pre ssur e characteristic s ucil t ha t, with th e di a phragm as the mo ving pl ale of [l cond enser in serLed in th e fr eq llellc),-colltrolling cir cui t of a vVien-bridge oscillaLor, lhe frequ ellc.\ ' deviatiolls of Lhe oscillalor would be propo rtio na1 to the pr ess ur e d i fl' eren ce ac J' oss the di ap hragm. For a ",Vi ell-bridge oscill ator th e relation for va ri aL ioll of one capac itor is fct:.C - 1/ 2 Ass umin g a n ideal p arallcl-plaLe co nd c>ll scr, L il c wan ted press ur e-di spl acement relation ovcr the working range of the diaphragm w as p ct:. cl + 1/ 2 Thc imp erf ect in verse proportionali ty b eLween capaci- tance a nd pl ate separaLion in a physicall)' rcalizable condenser n ecessiLa ted some empirical adjusLmen t of tbe diaphr agm configur at ion to obtain the requircd c hara cte ri st ic. Additional specifi cat ions for the diaplu'agm-oscil- lator combinaLion called fo r a sensitivity of 0 .:3- to l.O-percent frequency chan ge per dync per sq uar c centim eLer, good lin earit y between - 30 a nd + 30 dlcm 2, and good long-t ime s Lability . In addiLion, the diaphragm w as requi red also to LoleraLe mo- mentar y ovcrpreSSUl'e of t be order of ] ,000 d/cm 2. 2. Description of Diaphragm 2.1. Forming Die Th e diaphragms were pressed from O.OOl-in .-thi ck commercial s oft-brass s him stock. Figur e 1 shows the arrangeme nt of the 4 circumferential a nd 60 radial corru gat ions impr essed in a fini sh ed diaphr agm. Not discernibl e in the photograph is the slight con- cavity , or cuppin g, imparted to the diaphI'agm durin g the forming operat ion . Th e combined eff ect of the radial corrugation s and con cav i ty co mpel s the diaphragm to exec ut e an umbr ella-like motion wh en pre ss ur e is appli ed . It is more compliant wh en pr ess ur e is applied to its convex s id e t han to it s co n cave sid e. Figure 2 gives Lhe essential dimensions of the di e. Ea ch radial groov e was 0.015 in . deep at its outer end and 0.005 in. deep at its inn er e nd , and the ce ntr al areas were depr essed 0.005 in. with resp ect to the circumf er e ntial flat s. Although the groov es in the die were C ll t with a sharp V -pointed tool, the formin g pr ess ur e was not gr eat enough to force the m et al to the bo LLo m of the groov es. As a r es ult , th e cross FI GURE 1. J llal ri.c for forming a nonlinear di aphragm. secL ions acqu ir ed by Lhe cOl'ru gaLions were nearly arcs of circles. E a rli er di es had a singl e, small hole at the eentrr Lo allow escape of air dmin g the formin g operation . Lat er dies were pro v id ed with hol es for each circum- f er ential groove. In addition, the edges of the cir- cumf er ential grooves of l ater dies were rounded to redu ce th e te nd ency of the sh eet m etal to tear durin g the formin g oper ation. This rounding also resul ted in more uniform chara cteri stics in the fini sh ed diaphI'agms. Th e s urfa ce of the di e, including the grooves, was brought to a me dium poli sh . 2.2. Diaphragm Fabrication Ann eal ed brass shim stock, co mmercially available in rolls 6 in. wide, was fir st examin ed for pinhol es under back li ghting. Disks, s omewh at greater than in. in diameter , were cut out of pinhol e-free areas with sciss ors, using care no t to kink the mat erial. Simil ar di sks were cut from unbl eached pap er . Two of the brass and three pap er di sks were t hen in ter- l eaved, clamped b etween brass blocks in a l athe, and t urn ed to the final diameter . Th e diaphragms were formed by pressing them again st the clean oilfree die in a h ydrauli c press arranged as shown in fi gur es 3 a nd 4. One of the 333

Transcript of A nonlinear instrument diaphragm - NIST · acceptable linear range was from - 25 to + 25 dlcm 2 and...

Page 1: A nonlinear instrument diaphragm - NIST · acceptable linear range was from - 25 to + 25 dlcm 2 and the acceptable range of sensitivities in the linear region was 5 to 11 cps per

Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Vol. 58, No. 6, June 1957 Research Paper 2766

A Nonlinear Instrument Diaphragm Fidel Cordero, Harry Matheson, and Daniel P. Johnson

D etai ls of fabrication for t he production of sensiti ve diaphragms having a controlled non lin ear pressure-deflect ion characteristic arc presented . The desired characteri s t ic was s uch t hat when the di a phragm formed one plate of a con denser in the freq ucncy-controll ing network of a \Vien-bridge oscillator, t he resul t ing press lire-frequcncy transfer characteri stic wo uld be linear betwee n -30 and + 30 dynes pCI' sq uare centimeter. Typical transfer cur ves are shown .

1. Introduction

The diaphragm descri bed h erein was required to bave a deflection versus pressure characteristic sucil tha t , with th e di aphragm as the moving plale of [l

condenser inserLed in th e freqllell c),-colltrolling circui t of a vVien-bridge osci llaLor, lh e frequ ellc.\' deviatioll s of Lhe oscillalor would be propo rtiona1 to the pressure d i fl'eren ce acJ'oss the diaphragm. For a ",Viell-bridge oscillator th e frequenc~'-('apaeitan ce r elation for va riaLioll of one capacitor is fct:.C- 1/2 •

Assuming a n ideal parallcl-plaLe co ndc>ll scr, Lil c wanted pressure-displacement relation ovcr the working r ange of the diaphragm was p ct:. cl+1/ 2• Thc imperfect in verse proportionality b eLween capaci­tance a nd plate separaLion in a physicall)' rcalizable condenser n ecessiLa ted som e empirical adjusLmen t of tbe diaphragm configuration to obtain th e r equircd characteristic.

Additional specifications for the diaplu'agm-osci l­lator combinaLion called for a sensitivity of 0.:3- to l.O-percent frequency chan ge per dy nc per squarc centimeLer, good linearity between - 30 and + 30 dlcm 2, and good long-time sLability . In addiLion, the diaphragm was requi red also to LoleraLe mo­m entary ovcrpreSSUl'e of tbe order of ] ,000 d/cm 2.

2. Description of Diaphragm

2.1. Forming Die

The diaphragms were pressed from O.OOl-in.-thick commercial soft-brass shim stock . Figure 1 shows the arrangemen t of the 4 circumferential and 60 radial corrugations impressed in a fini shed diaphragm. Not discernible in the photograph is the sligh t con­cavity, or cupping, imparted to the diaphI'agm during the forming operation .

The combin ed effect of the radial corrugations and concavity compels the diaphragm to execute an umbrella-like motion when pressure is applied . It is more complia nt when pressure is applied to its convex sid e than to its concave side.

Figure 2 gives Lhe essential dimens ions of th e die. Each radial groove was 0.015 in . deep at its outer end and 0.005 in. deep at its inn er end, and the central areas were depressed 0.005 in. with r espect to the circumferential flats. Al though the grooves in the die were Cll t with a sharp V -pointed tool, the formin g pressure was not great enough to force the m etal to the bo LLom of the grooves. As a r esult, the cross

FI GURE 1. Jllal ri.c for f orm ing a n onlinear diaphragm.

secLions acqu ired by Lhe cOl'ru gaLions were nearly arcs of circles.

E a rlier dies had a single, small hole at the eentrr Lo allow escape of air dming the formin g operation . Later dies were provided with holes for each circum­fer ential groove. In addition, the edges of the cir­cumferential grooves of later dies were rounded to r educe th e tend en cy of the sheet m etal to tear during the forming operation. This rounding also resul ted in more uniform characteristics in the fini shed diaphI'agms. The s urface of the die, including the grooves, was brought to a medium polish.

2.2. Diaphragm Fabrication

Annealed brass shim stock , commercially available in rolls 6 in . wide, was first examined for pinholes under back lighting. Disks, somewhat greater than 3 )~ in . in diameter, were cut out of pinhole-free areas with scissors, using care no t to kink the material. Similar disks were cut from unbleached paper. Two of the brass and three paper disks were then in ter­leaved , clamped between brass blocks in a lathe, and turn ed to the final diameter.

The diaphragms were formed by pressing them against the clean oilfree die in a hydraulic press arranged as shown in figures 3 and 4. One of the

333

Page 2: A nonlinear instrument diaphragm - NIST · acceptable linear range was from - 25 to + 25 dlcm 2 and the acceptable range of sensitivities in the linear region was 5 to 11 cps per

SECTION A · A'

DETAIL 'f(

APPROX . . 030"---"---./

.005 .005

60 RADIAL GROOVES EQUALLY SPACED 110' INCLUDED ANGLE REMOVE ALL BURRS TO MA XIMUM .005"

~------ 1.750 ------~---j

I1":~Ji .D 15

I'

ALL DIMEN SIONS IN INCHE S

__ 1 SECTION B" B'

FIGURE 2. Drawing for repl·oducing a matrix. Note that each radial groo\·c is 0.015 in . deep at its outer cnd and 0.005 in. deep at its inner end and tbat the cen tral

areas are depressed 0.005 in . with respect to the cLrcu mferential fiats.

OF PRE SS/ ~ l1li --------- BLANK

~O F PRESS ~~

PAPER

FORM IN G PRESSURE

FIGURE 3. H ydraulic press arranged for forming diaphragms, using dental dam.

FIG URE 4. Origin'!l arrangement of equipment for forming diaphragms.

334

l

Page 3: A nonlinear instrument diaphragm - NIST · acceptable linear range was from - 25 to + 25 dlcm 2 and the acceptable range of sensitivities in the linear region was 5 to 11 cps per

paper disks was used as a gask et to seal the joint between the lower platen and the diaphragm. After the press was closed with a force of 10 tons con een­tratcd on an annulus 0.170 in . wide at the edge of the diaphragm, the diaphragm was formed by the application of 1,500 psi for several seconds.

After r elease of the forming pressure, the press wa opened and the die was removed. Absence of oil on the face of th e die indicated that the diaphragm was not torn during the formin g process. The dia­phragm and paper gasket were carefully slid off the annulus of the lower platen and tbe gasket peeled from the diaphragm. The diaphragm was rinsed in petroleum eth er, u sing a wire holder , carefully examined for pinholes and tears under back lighting, and stored in a cardboard rack.

More recently the fabrication procedure has been modified either as a matter of convenience or because it was felt that a more uniform product r esulted . The modification s wer e

(1) The blanks were cut withou t paper in terleaves, turning the lathe by hand and using a razor blade as a cutting edge.

(2) Rolled edges and burrs on the disks were removed by laying the blank on a piece of plate glass and dragging a razor blade over the edge of the blank to straigh ten the edge.

(3) The blank was protected from th e hydraulic fluid by a sh eet of den tal dam. The dam was clamped between brass rings and was held over the boLLom platen. The rings also served to center the blank and clie for formin g.

(4) Lens paper was substituted for Lhe bulkier , un sized paper and placed between the blank and the den tal dam.

(5) After formin g the diaphragm it was removed from Lhe reeess formed by the brass rings and den tal dam by gen tly touching its edge wiLh scoLch tape and lifting it from th e recess.

(6) The petroleum ether clip was omitted. Once a diaphragm was formed, it became essen tial

not to handle it by the edge or in any mann er thaL would produce distortion across a chord or diameter.

3. Proof Tests

The diaphragms wore formed against a cl ie with the ce nter recessed 0.005 in. When the forming pressure was removed, the central part of th e dia­phragm sprang away from the die , so that th e eenter of the diaphragm was above the plane of the r im, i . e., the diaphragm acquired a cupped shape.

3.1. Cupping and Compliance

For measurement of cupping and compliance, the diaphragms were moun Lcd in a jig consisting of two brass disks wi Lh clamping rings cu t on their mating surfaces. The jig was moun Led to hold Lhe diaphragm horizontally on the carriage of a milling m achine. The position of Lhe diaphragm was detected by a fixed-wire probe connecLed Lo an electronic indicator (capacitance bridge). The diaphragm 'was broughL

in to con tact with the probe by moving the carriage vertically or hori zontally by the posi tioning screws of Lh e carriage. Displacemen ts were m easured with the micrometer on the posi tioning screws.

Most of the diaphragms showed a cupping of 0.004 to 0 .008 in. , with occasional values as Iow a 0 and as high as 0.015 in. or more. As no direct relaLion b etween cupping and ei ther sensitivity or dynamic r ange was observed, diaphragms whose cuppin g was within the r ange 0.004 to 0.008 in. were eonsidered acceptable for further testing.

The m echanical compliance of each diaphragm was m easured by determining the pressure necessary to produce centr al displacements of + 0.010 , + 0.005, - 0.005 and - 0.010 in. of the diaphragm . Some typical values are shown in table 1. A water-filled manometer with a 1:20 slope was adequate for determining the pressure.

TABLE 1. ~Mechanical campl'iance af l'epresentative diaphragms

Pressure for tbe fo llowing defl ections ill inehes I Diaphragm

+ 0.010 + 0.005 o -0.005 - 0.010 1------------------- - --

208 _________________ _ 170. ________________ _ 226 ________________ _ 222 ._ ____ ___ __ _ 162. __________ ____ _ _

249 _______ .. _____ __ _ 33 ______ . __ . ___ __ . _ 14_____ ___ _ _____ _ 10 ________________ _ 9 __ . __ _ . ___ . _______ _

diem' + 134 + l25 + 124 + 135 + 11 8

+ 134 + 144 + 130 + l42 + 144

diem' +53 + 47 +49 +52 + 45

+51 +52 + 47 +54 +53

diem' o o o o o o o o o o

diem' - 38 -3.5 -37 - 38 - 31

- 37 -33 -32 -34 -36

diem' -67 -61 -64 -66 -53

-64 -52 - 49 -57 -58

I T be diapbragm moves toward tbe backplate for 3 positive pressure diITerencc.

The m echanical compliance was not found to be eli rectly related to the observed scnsitivity or dynamie range of a finished capsule, probably b ecause of tbe effect of clamping pre sure discussed below. How­ever , th e measuremen ts did serve to rejeet dia­pluagms that were obviously too s tiff, too compliant, o r for which the curvature of the load-deflection curve was obviously wrong. It was occasionally surprising to see two diaphragms with quite similar m echanical compliances result in finished capsules, one of which would be quite satisfactory, whereas the oth er showed only a limi ted linear range.

3 .2. Pressure-Frequency Relation

After completion of the meehanical tests th e dia­phragm was mOllnted in its permanent holder, or capsule, as shown in figure 5, and th e backplate was

CLEARANCE ABOUT 0.010"

SECTION THROUGH CAPSULE

FIG U RE 5. Crass-sectianal sketch af assembled capsule showing the l'elative pasitions af the diaz)hragm and backplate.

335

Page 4: A nonlinear instrument diaphragm - NIST · acceptable linear range was from - 25 to + 25 dlcm 2 and the acceptable range of sensitivities in the linear region was 5 to 11 cps per

2600

2400

2200

~ 2000

"-II>

'" ...J

~ 18 0 0 <> >-<> z '" 5 16 00

'" 0: ... 14 00

1200

10 00

I

II /

II

/ V V

/)7 V

V1 1/ /

.-/I~

-~ -120 -80 -40 o 40

PRESSURE . OYNES/cm2

V B V

/' /

A

V

/'

80 120 160

F I GURE 6. P TessuTe-jrequency Telations fm' capsule-oscillatoT combinations with adequate linear range.

A, 1Hnimunl acceptable sensitivity; TI, excellent senSiti vity. The diaphragm moves away from the backplate for a positive prcssure diffcrcnce.

shimmed to give an electrical capacitance of 100 ± 5 J..IpJ . Final acceptance of a diaphragm was bascd on a plot of the pressure difference across the diaphragm in its own capsule against the frequency of a Wien­bridge oscillator connected to the capsule. For these measurements the pressure differences were obtained with a gas-pressure balance.

Calibration curves for two diaphragms with extr eme characteristics are shown in figure 6. Except when intended for special purposes, the minimum acceptable linear range was from - 25 to + 25 dlcm 2

and th e acceptable range of sensitivities in the linear region was 5 to 11 cps per d/cm2•

4 . Capsule

Th e diaphragm was clamped in a capsule body consisting of two heavy-brass rings, a backplate, an in sulating glass plate, and miscellaneous screws and fittings. Figure 7 shows the parts in an exploded view. The three critical surfaces were the two that clamp the edge of the diaphragm and that which posi tions the glass plate in the top half of the capsule body , figure 5. Where it was necessary to seal the interface between the glass plate and capsule body and the threads of th e backplate against leaks of air, a silicone grease was found to be satisfactory.

To avoid electric short circuits in a capsule when the diaphragm was subjected to excessive pressure, the exposed surface of the backplate was coated with an insulating lacquer.

'Ii' o CUP WASHER

Q SPACER

J GLAS S PLATE

r BACK PLATE

'\ \ ? I IF -=-" ~' ( ) ., : " ,l~~m

~ " • ~ PRES SURE .if l' INL ET

,Q Vt, DIAPHRAGM

=0 CLAMPING SCREW

FIGUR E 7. P m·ts of a complete capsule f 01" compa1"ison with figw'e 6 .

The two halves of the capsule body were held together by six 10- 32 brass screws. A study of the optimum clamping pressure showed, surprisingly enough, that very small distortion s of the capsule body were often essential to obtain optimum characteristics.

4 .1. Transfer Characteristic

The family of curves in figure 8 are t~Tpical of the pressure-frequency transfer characteristics of a cap­sule-oscillator combination. A number of dia­phragms, made from the same roll of material and formed on the same die, showed essentially the same family. Curve Aa was obtained with the clamping screws barely tight. T ightening the clamping screws with a torque screwdriver in 5-in.-Ib increments pro­duced progressively higher sensitivities and improved linearity up to 20 in.-Ib of torque. Note that for 25 in .-Ib the curve is quite unsymmetrical and the linear range is markedly reduced. A quite similar family of curves could be obtained by loosening all screws and progressively retightening them , but not by progressive loosening only.

Attempts have been made to determine the volume compliance of these diaphragms at the rest-point.. The results indicate a range of about 0.002 to 0.008 cm3 per d/cm 2•

336

Page 5: A nonlinear instrument diaphragm - NIST · acceptable linear range was from - 25 to + 25 dlcm 2 and the acceptable range of sensitivities in the linear region was 5 to 11 cps per

2400

I I I I I I I I _, 2200

200 0

u .. 18 00 ,

U>

'"

i-

~ r--CURVE CLAMPING SCREW

r--~/ f--TORQUE Or--'IN CH POUNDS)

f--Ao 0

~/>_//' Bb 5 -Cc 10

- Od 15 E. 20

- FI 25

~ -' u >-u. 16 0 0 >-u ~ ::> 0

'" 140 0 ::=

120~

1000

I 7 / I--

V t--

~ --

i-V 8 /

k~ c /

o /

E / - r--80 0 ==f I F I

-120 -80 - 40 0 40 8 0 120 160 PRESSURE , DYNES/em2

FIG URE 8. Curves show'ing the e.fJect oj clamping preSSUTe, on a dwphmgm, on the tmnsJer characteristics oj a capsule­oscillator combination.

4 .2 . Serviceability

The unmounted diaphragms had to be handled with considerable car e. Injudicious flexing of an unmounted diaphragm impaired its performance probably because the cupping was d isturbed. EVeJ~ edge damage limited to the portion of the diaphragm that was firmly clamped, altered the pressure­deflection characteristics. In practice, the dia­phragms were n ever handled with the fingers or

with tweezers but were manipulated on sheets of paper by tilting the paper to slide th e diaphragm as required. Diaphragms could be picked up from a flat surface by slipping a sh ee t of paper und er th em and lifting the paper. 'iiVhen necessary, they could be grasped safely between thumb and finger at the center. Storage and shipment in paper en­velopes with a cardboard stiffen er against the back of the diaphragm ha s b een quite successful , provided the surfaces of the envelope were protec ted from pres~u~·e. Prolonged storage o~ (~ iaphragms at high hunydlty produced surface staI!llng, which , though llllsightly, had no detectable eff ect on performance.

Diaphragms have, on many occasions, been r e­moved from a capsule and re turned to it withou t. detectable effect on the pressure-frequ ency curve.

Over 1,200 capsule-months of op eration have shown that the diaphragms will remai n sta,ble in sensitivity and rest-point when subj ected to alter­nating pressures up to 100 d/cm2 at in tervals of several minutes. The service life of an assembled capsule is known to exceed 2 years a nd appears to be indefinite. Observations over a period of months indicate that the sensitivity of a caps ule m ay increase on the order of 5 percent a year.

No data is available 011 temporary or permanent changes in r est-poin t resulting from long sustained pressure difference acrOS3 r epresentative diaphragms. One series of experiments on a single d iaph ragm in­dicated that a momen tary pressure of 4 ,000 d/cm 2

produced a detectable efl'ect on th e r est-point. The momen tary application of 6,000 cI /cm 2 sltiftecl at least temporarily, the pressure-frequency curv~ of the capsule-oscillator combination, but th e dia­phragm was judged to b e still serviceable.

'i~TASHIKG'l'ON , November 9, 1956.

337