A module in our pocket, MELSIG contribution 6 Sep 2013 with Liz Hannaford
-
Upload
chrissi-nerantzi -
Category
Education
-
view
443 -
download
3
Transcript of A module in our pocket, MELSIG contribution 6 Sep 2013 with Liz Hannaford
a module in our pocket
Chrissi Nerantzi @chrissinerantzi
Liz Hannaford @lizhannaford
Higher Education: Our metaphors • Think >draw/write/make
• Swap
• Discuss
• Reflect
Universities are spaces to....
• sustain conversations
• shape the future of human life
• stimulate innovation
• shape new structures of and for learning
• shape new pedagogies
from ECEL2011 keynote by Prof. Anne Boddington, Dean of the Faculty of Arts, University of Brighton
freedom
opening-up the
participatory web
innovation
universities are the people!
image with crowd, students
stu
den
ts &
tea
cher
s
What does this tell us?
Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice (PGCAP)
• the programme
• blended
• core and optional modules
• multi-disciplinary
• Teaching qualification in HE
• accreditation HEA, NMC
• greenhouse for active experimentation
Stories in a story
A question to a new academic: What do you love about your job?
access on the go: LTHE site
http://learningandteachinghe.wordpress.com/
Discussing and supporting: Google +
https://plus.google.com/communities/112186086573392653278
Capturing learning: PGCAP portfolios
Visual learning: YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/user/pgcapsalford/videos
4 stories plus 1
• new to downloading apps • Socrative app > the ‘quiz’
term was problematic • Game worked better,
increased engagement • also used to collect student
feedback on teaching
• experienced with digital technologies • media-rich learning using WordPress on
the go • ‘always on’ > support network
(commenting and feedback) • community formation • Collaborative content creation
• Twitter to connect with each other, information exchange
• speedy connection via smart devices • valued connections with the wider community and
more experienced colleagues • organising Twitterchats using hashtags with own
students, student-led!!! • Students were apprehensive about using Twitter for
their learning
• YouTube and video creation to catch up • Nadine stated: “Social media fostered inclusivity”
• had a Twitter account before joining
• Twitter > communication with students
• students relactant to respond/share
• introduced Facebook group > observed more exchange
Juliette @juliettephd
Neil @asbo_allstar
Nadine @neddy4291
Gemma @gemmalace
Juliette’s story @juliettephd
• new to downloading apps
• Socrative app > the ‘quiz’ term was problematic
• Game worked better, increased engagement
• also used to collect student feedback on teaching
Neil’s story @asbo_allstar • experienced with digital technologies • media-rich learning using WordPress on the go • ‘always on’ > support network (commenting and feedback) • community formation • Collaborative content creation
Nadine’s story @neddy4291
• Twitter to connect with each other, information exchange • speedy connection via smart devices • valued connections with the wider community and more experienced colleagues • organising Twitterchats using hashtags with own students, student-led!!! • Students were apprehensive about using Twitter for their learning
• YouTube and video creation to catch up • Nadine stated: “Social media fostered inclusivity”
Gemma’s story @gemmalace
• had a Twitter account before joining
• Twitter > communication with students
• students relactant to respond/share
• introduced Facebook group > observed more exchange
thinking with our hands 1/2
Smart innovation Task 1 (3 mins): Use up to 10 LEGO® bricks to create a model of an idea about how you could teach/learn smarter (individually)
Liz’s story @lizhannaford
Journalism – Digital and Mobile
@LizHannaford
What’s the Story
thinking with our hands 2/2
Smart innovation Task2 (5 mins): Share the LEGO® model you created previously with others. Listen to their stories! (groups of 4-6) Task 3 (2 mins): Reflect and revisit your model. Finalise your idea. (individually)
A module in our pocket, findings
Benefits • Increased connectivity and connectedness • Helped the formation of a learning community • Students’ opened up more, shared more • Peer-to-peer support, learning and collaboration increased • Increased curiosity to explore and actively experiment • Resourceful use of existing technologies • Teaching practices started changing
Challenges • Using own devices for Learning and Teaching new concept • Technological barriers • Support issues • Mismatch of expectations • Social media addiction?
“We need to stop seeing the curriculum as a predictable, ordered and manageable space, but instead review it as an important site of transformation characterised by risk and uncertainty”
Prof. Maggi Savin-Baden, Prof of Higher Education Research, Coventry University, 2011 ECEL2011 contribution
a module in our pocket
join open FDOL at http://fdol.wordpress.com/
an open course in
your pocket
www.oer14.org Great
opportunity
References
Anderson, T. and Elloumi, F. (2004) ‘Introduction’, in: Anderson, T. and Elloumi (eds.) Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Canada: Athabasca University, pp. xii-xxiv.
Goldstein, S. R. (1976) The asserted constitutional right of public school teachers to determine what they teach, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 124, 1293-357.
Metzger, W. (1987) ‘Profession and constitution: two definitions of academic freefom in America’, Texas Law Review, 1265-322.
Nerantzi, C, Wilson, J, Munro, N, Lace-Costigan, G and Currie N (submitted) Warning! Modelling effective mobile learning is infectious, an example from Higher Education, UCISA.
Wiley, D. and Hilton, J. (2009) Openness, Dynamic Specialization, and the Disaggregated Future of Higher Education, in: International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Volume 10, Number 5, 2009, pp. 1-16., available at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/768 [accessed 25 February 2013]
contact us!
Chrissi Nerantzi: @chrissinerantzi
Liz Hannaford: @lizhannaford