A Modular Geoelectrical Monitoring System as Part of … · Concentric circles with 16 surface...

21
a Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Centre for CO2 Storage, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany b Technical University Berlin, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Ackerstrasse 76, 13355 Berlin, Germany c Statoil ASA, Grenseveien 21, 4035 Stavanger, Norway A Modular Geoelectrical Monitoring System as Part of the Surveillance Concept in CO 2 Storage Projects Photo: Installation of VERA system C. Schmidt-Hattenberger a , P. Bergmann a , T. Labitzke a , S. Schröder a , K. Krüger a , C. Rücker b , H. Schütt c TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Transcript of A Modular Geoelectrical Monitoring System as Part of … · Concentric circles with 16 surface...

aHelmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Centre for CO2 Storage, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany bTechnical University Berlin, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Ackerstrasse 76, 13355 Berlin, Germany cStatoil ASA, Grenseveien 21, 4035 Stavanger, Norway

A Modular Geoelectrical Monitoring System as Part of the Surveillance Concept in CO2 Storage Projects

Photo: Installation of VERA system

C. Schmidt-Hattenbergera, P. Bergmanna, T. Labitzkea,

S. Schrödera, K. Krügera, C. Rückerb, H. Schüttc

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

The Ketzin ERT Concept: Combination ofCrosshole & Surface-Downhole Measurements

Permanent installation of Vertical Electrical ResistivityArray (VERA) in the three Ketzin wells (at insulatedcasing)

Concentric circles with 16 surface dipoles & crossedprofiles for enlargement of observation area, dipole length: 150 m, r1 = 800 m, r2 = 1500 m )

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

The Ketzin Geoelectrics as Modular Monitoring System (MMS)

Feasibility

Design &Installation

OnlineData Acquisition

Data Transfer & Conversion

Data Archiving & Mining

Digital SignalProcessing

Inversion

Mesh Definition & Adaption

ResistivityMapping

Petrophysical Con-version (inverse)

Quantification DataIntegration

Quality Control & Infield Inversion

Linking to externaldatabasesProcess Data

Geologic advanceinformation

Fluid FlowModeling

Petrophysical Con-version (forward)

Detection

Preparation

Acquisition

Processing

Evaluation

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Preparation

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

615

620

625

630

635

640

645

650

655

660

665

670

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

dept

h [m

]

resistivity [Ωm]

log (before CO2)log blockedArchie from log

Feasibility Study

2.5 Ωm

1.3 Ωm

0.75 Wm (100% brine)or2.0 Wm (50% brine + 50% CO2)

Well completion

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

z=642.5 m

(H. Schütt, 2009)

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Design & Installation

(Photos: Courtesy of University Leipzig)

(Photos: Courtesy of GFZ)

current: 2.5 A max. channels: 15

(for potential registration) measured voltage: 50 µV to 100 mV signal period: 8 s

current: 4 – 10 Avoltage: 500 – 1300 V

signal period: 16 sLength of time series ~ 1 h

Insulated casing

Stainless-steelelectrode

MeasurementUnit (ZONGE)

Electric power source TSQ-4 (SCINTREX)

Electrode ensemble for current injection

Data logger (TEXAN-125)

Site-specific Customization ofSurface and Downhole Equipment.

Acquisition

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

arrival atwell 202

begin ofinjection

degradingeffects

ERT system was among thefirst instruments which detectedthe CO2 plume signature.

Matching with process dataand well completion data canhelp to understand effects in thetime-history of ERT data.

Valuable information from pre-inversiondata available.

Example: Analysis of contact resistancesof the VERA system (check before eachsurvey).

Analysis of Temporal Behavior and Quality ofField Data

Process data by CO2DataTool V6.2

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Conditioning of Field Data by Pre-Processing Routines

• Surface-Downhole data: averaging and stacking of the multiple time-series.• Crosshole data: the large variety of electrode acquisition schemes sets time

constraints only two-cycles of time series for all ABMN combinations have been measured.

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Deployed electrodeconfigurations for dataacquisition.

Error evaluation for fielddata quality assessment.

Averaging and Spline interpolation ofthe complete ABMN-data set providestabilisation of time history.

Processing

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Inversion Strategy

• Test of various program codes : EarthImager, ERTLab, BERT

• Deployment of constraints, e.g. resistivity logs andlaboratory results

• Predefinition of most essentialparameters:λ-regularization , z- geometrical weight, E- error weight

• Separate investigation of 2D inversion results for two observation planes.

0.5 - 5 Ωm → low-res. environment small resistivity contrasts moderate resistivity changes thin target reservoir zone

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

(Bergmann & Labitzke, 2010)

2D Time-lapse Results• Gravity driven upward

migration (funnel-like shape) was observedsince middle of August2008.

steady-state situationreached in December2008.

• Attenuated resistivity profiles in theobservation plane Ktzi200-Ktzi201for phases of significant reduced injection rate

(March – August 2010).

• Good coverage of theinjection start phase byfrequently measureddata sets given.

Ktzi201 Ktzi200 Ktzi201 Ktzi200 Ktzi201 Ktzi200 Ktzi201 Ktzi200

August 18, 2008 December 03, 2008 March 15, 2010 April 02, 2011

Rat

io (

base

/mon

itor

data

)

Inv

ersi

on (

mon

itor

data

)

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Time history of inverted resistivity - observed bya model cell of [5m x 5m] @ depth of 640 m ~ mid ofreservoir, in the plane Ktzi200-Ktzi201 .

CO

2 f

low

[t/h

our]

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

3D Time-lapse Results

Consistent results in the planes Ktzi200-Ktzi201, and Ktzi200-Ktzi202 obtained byseparate 2D calculations. Consistency exists also between the Crosshole and Surface-Downhole evaluation.Significant CO2 effect necessary in order to detect the arrival at both observation wells (Ktzi200 / Ktzi202) in the inverted data (true volume effect 1-2 months later). Assumption: limited 3D effect since Nov 2009 (degradation detected by contactresistances) handling of critical electrodes: some of them have to be excludedfrom interpretation, and some of them even from the inversion procedure.

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

3D ViewZ-slice @ 630 m

Ktzi201 Ktzi200

z=620 m

201 200

202z=635 m

201 200

202 z=640 m

201 200

202

201200

202

Data set from July 2010

Evaluation

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

& (P. Frykman, 2008)

(Norden et al., 2008)

Contribution to Data Integration

well EffectiveSaturationSCO2

Ktzi201 60-80 %Ktzi200 40-60%Ktzi202 20-30 %

Input into static and dynamic modeling was started and has to be proven.Available data are on different scales, not easy to match them !

(Ivanova et al., 2011,accepted)

(P. Frykman, 2008)(Norden et al., 2008)

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Geoelectrical Large-Scale MeasurementsApril 2009 3rd repeat ,

13500 t CO2

inversion realization (P. Bergmann, 2011)

Ktzi200-Ktzi202 plane

(Norden et al., 2008 / Frykman et al., 2008)

• Geophysical monitoring can detect small amounts of CO2 .• Further data integration is necessary and can be done initerative way

• Continued observation of reliability and long-term stability of thegeoelectric array provides a valuable contribution to consolidatedPerformance Assessment (P.A.) work.

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Ktzi200-Ktzi202 plane

November 2008 2nd repeat ,

4500 t CO2

Quantification

ResistivityMapping

PetrophysicalConversion (inverse)

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

• CO2 signature has been detected. Sufficient spatial resolution, but no detailed structural information is available.

• Data sets are consolidated now, updated petrophysicalresults are available.

• Operating range: extended wellbore area.

Evaluation & Outlook

Necessary prerequisite forminimizing uncertainty in the planned quantification.

Summary The present research work is based on three years of regularinjection operation.

Technology for ERT surface and downhole installation has beensuccessfully site-proofed.

Conditioning of field data by suitable pre-processing and by adaptation of the inversion module 3D-BERT has been achieved.

The lowest detection threshold is still under evaluation.

VERA system is a valuable interface for CSEM/MT measurements.

Objective: to deliver a realistic and reliable specification for the ERT-MMS, which can help regulators/operators to decide for this surveillance technique.

TCCS-6 , June 14-16, 2011, Trondheim (Norway)

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the European Commission,

Industrial Partners, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and

Research (BMBF).

We thank all involved persons of theKetzin Team.

Thank you for your attention.