A model integration framework

15
A MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION Jorge A. Guzman 1 , Daniel Moriasi 1 , Prasanna Gowda 2 , Jean Steiner 1 , Patrick Starks 1 , Jeff Arnold 3 , Raghavan Srinivasan 4 1 USDAARS GRL, El Reno, OK; 2 USDAARS CPRL, Bushlands, TX; 3 USDAARS GSWRL, Temple, TX; 4 Texas A&M, AgriLife Research, College Station, TX SWCS International Annual Meeting Lombard, IL. July 2730, 2014

Transcript of A model integration framework

Page 1: A model integration framework

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

Jorge A. Guzman1, Daniel Moriasi1, Prasanna Gowda2, Jean Steiner1, Patrick Starks1, Jeff Arnold3, Raghavan Srinivasan4

1USDA‐ARS GRL, El Reno, OK; 2USDA‐ARS CPRL, Bushlands, TX; 3USDA‐ARS GSWRL, Temple, TX; 4Texas A&M, AgriLife Research, College Station, TX

SWCS International Annual MeetingLombard, IL.  July 27‐30, 2014

Page 2: A model integration framework

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

Improve process model simulation at the WS• New research knowledge becomes available

• Finer spatio-temporal resolutions data• Feedback fluxes

• Long-term impacts assessments• Future scenarios• Agro-ecosystem interactions

• Decrease uncertainty in model outputs

Surface SubSurface

Page 3: A model integration framework

Guzman et al. (2012a, 2012b, 2013) 

Surface

USZ

SZBF

OF

PET

I

DP CR

Ain

Aout

RO

PF

WF IR

• Distributed ET fluxes

• Distributed percolation fluxes

• Distributed groundwater feedback fluxes

• Surface-groundwater interaction

Atmospheric-surface-subsurface hydrologic linkage• Hydrologic cycle is a complex system• Essential to account for in water budgets

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

Page 4: A model integration framework

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

SPELLmapSWATmf

SWAT‐MODFLOW

Spatio‐Temporal AnalysisVisualization SWAT‐MODFLOW project

builder

Surface‐Subsurface integrated model EB_ET

Model Integration Framework

ArcSWAT

SWAT projectbuilder

Page 5: A model integration framework

B→13s→ 1m→ AreafracB→14s→ 1m → AreafracB→22s→ 1m → AreafracB→23s→ 1m → AreafracB→24s→ 1m → AreafracB→31s→ 5m → AreafracB→32s→ 5m → AreafracA→33s→ 5m → AreafracA→34s→ 5m → AreafracA→41s→ 5m → AreafracA→42s→ 5m → AreafracA→43s→ 5m → AreafracA→52s→ 5m → Areafrac

A B A

DE

C

xll,yll

xll,yll

0s 1s 9s10s

79

19s

70s 7860s

0m 3m

4m

8m 11m

1m

10m

7m

1w

2w

3w

4w

(b)

SWAT‐MODFLOW domains indexation

(Lookup table)

SWATmf‐app

(SPELLmap)

SWATmf‐model †

RasterTime series

• NAM, BAS, DIS, NWT, LIST, UPW, LPF, OC, RCH, WEL, DRN, CHD, GHB, RES

• Log file• Update  file 

handles

• Lookup tables• Contextual data

• MODFLOW outputs (LIST, RCH‐S, HDS, WEL‐S)

• SWAT outputs

SPELLmap

ArcSWAT

SWATproject

• HDS time series• HDS daily maps• EXT time series• Metrics

MODFLOW project SWAT‐MODFLOW project

SWAT

MODFLOW

Interface

† SWATmf‐model

HRUFeature class

(a)

arcSWAT HRU polygon domain

SWAT HRU grid domain

MODFLOW cells grid domainMODFLOW wells domain

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

Remote sensing grid domain

EB‐ET

Page 6: A model integration framework

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

The Fort Cobb Reservoir Experimental Watershed (FCREW)USDA‐ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory, Oklahoma

Page 7: A model integration framework

UNCERTAINTY CONSIDERATIONS IN CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND WATER QUALITY MODELS

SPATIAL DISCRETIZATION & LINKAGE

Land Use

Slope

Soil Class

HRUs ID Grid 

ExtractionWells

Wells to HRUs

SURFACE DOMAIN(30 x 30 m)

River Network

FCREW

Lookup Table

(b)(c)

MODEL CONCEPTUALIZATION

LAND USE

LANSAT

(a)

Page 8: A model integration framework

INTEGRATION OF ENERGY BALANCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION & SWATmf MODEL 

LANSAT

HRU indexEB_ET

Daily

ET Accounting for at least 50% of the water budget

Page 9: A model integration framework

0

2

4

6

8

Jan‐11 Mar‐11 May‐11 Jun‐11 Aug‐11 Oct‐11 Dec‐11

EVT (m

m d

‐1)

EB_ET SWAT

0

2

4

6

8

Jan‐11 Mar‐11 May‐11 Jun‐11 Aug‐11 Oct‐11 Dec‐11

EVT (m

m d

‐1)

EB_ET SWAT

2011 2011

INTEGRATION OF ENERGY BALANCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION & SWATmf MODEL 

W‐WTH W‐WTH

Subbasin 1 Subbasin 49

HRU 5HRU 804

Page 10: A model integration framework

‐8

‐6

‐4

‐2

0

2

4

6

Jan‐11 Mar‐11 May‐11 Jun‐11 Aug‐11 Oct‐11 Dec‐11

ET Deviatio

n (m

m d

‐1)

HRU‐5 HRU‐804

INTEGRATION OF ENERGY BALANCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION & SWATmf MODEL 

Rainfall    460.5Avg. RO         75

HRU‐5EB_ET :    805.2Model :   430.6‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

‐374.6

HRU‐804EB_ET :  1114.8Model :  474.1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

‐640.7

2011Model – EB_ET

Page 11: A model integration framework

Interfacing Routines

Lookup tablesContextual data

BAS, DIS, NWT, LIST, UPW, LPF, OC, RCH, WEL, DRN, CHD, GHB, RES

• Setup NAM, OC• Log file• Update  file 

handles

Interfacing Routines

HRUs percolationHRUs irrigation

• Updated RCH• Updated WEL• Log file

SWAT‐codedaily loop

MODFLOW‐codeStress period simulation

BAS, DIS, NWT, LIST, UPW, LPF, OC, DRN, CHD, 

GHB, RES

Day =firstyes

no

Day =last

MODFLOW‐codelaunch

1

SWATmf‐model

*.cioSWAT data

MODFLOW‐codeclose

END

SWAT ‐codesimulation

SWAT‐codeclose

1no

yes

coupled

yes

coupled

yes

2

no

2

no

coupled

no

yes

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

Page 12: A model integration framework

JAN FEB MAR

APR MAY JUN

JUL AUG SEP

OCT NOV DEC

Jul‐18‐11 Jul‐19‐11 Jul‐20‐11

Jul‐22‐11 Jul‐23‐11

(a) (b)

(c)

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

Page 13: A model integration framework

A

A’ B

B’C

C’

CROSS SECTION

Distance20,00015,00010,0005,0000

480

460

440

420

400

380

360

CROSS SECTION

Distance25,00020,00015,00010,0005,0000

500

480

460

440

420

400

380

CROSS SECTION

Distance30,00025,00020,00015,00010,0005,0000

520

500

480

460

440

420

400

380

A

A’ B

B’C

C’

Core2

Eakly

Alfalfa

A-A’

B-B’

C-C’

GWL

GWL

GWL

Marlow Formation

Marlow Formation

Marlow Formation

Rush Spring Aquifer

Rush Spring Aquifer

Rush Spring Aquifer

Core2 Alfalfa

AlfalfaEaklyn

EaklynCore2

Jul 17‐11

(a) (b)(c)

Top MODFLOW boundary

Terrain surface

Simulated groundwater level

ObservedSimulated

Alfalfa

Core2

Eakly

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

Page 14: A model integration framework

INTEGRATION OF ENERGY BALANCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION & SWATmf MODEL 

Page 15: A model integration framework

A  MODEL INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER INTERACTION

Thank you