A Model for Partnerships: Critical Steps for Successful Collaborations Pamela L. Eddy DIT Fulbright...
-
Upload
eugene-fowler -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of A Model for Partnerships: Critical Steps for Successful Collaborations Pamela L. Eddy DIT Fulbright...
A Model for Partnerships: Critical Steps for Successful
Collaborations
Pamela L. EddyDIT Fulbright Scholar
The College of William and Mary
Agenda
Critical Incident
Partnership Model
Case Study Examples
Application and Training Needs
Summary
Critical Incident
In considering the MMI collaboration, what would you describe as a critical incident for the partners? What is positive in the MMI story? What challenges exist? How could these challenges be leveraged for
opportunity?
Research Question
How do the strategic initiatives in tertiary education in Ireland impact university partnerships?
What were institutional and faculty motivations for participation?
What supported the partnerships? What challenged the partnerships?
Background
Universities Act 1997 recognized seven universities
Regional Technical Colleges Act 1999 designated 13 institutes of technology
In 1998 the HEA launched PRTLI (Programme for Research in Third-Level Institutions)
Four cycles of PRTLI have occurred with review underway for cycle 5.
PRTLI Summary
Goal: Strengthening national research capabilities via investment in human and physical infrastructure.
Total awarded is €865,273,117 Total number of projects funded is 83
28 in Biosciences and Biomedicine 9 in Chemical and Physical Sciences 14 in Information and Comm. Technology 4 in Platform Technologies & Research Lib 17 in Humanities and Social Sciences 11 in Envir., Marine, and Natural Sciences
Case Study Selection
Humanities Serving Irish Society (HSIS)
e-INIS/Cosmogrid (Irish Nat’l Infrastructure)
GradCAM (Graduate School of Creative Arts and Media
Molecular Medicine Ireland
Environment and Climate Change
Elements of a Partnership
Social Capital of Individuals Density Trust Centrality
Organizational Capital of Institutions Resources Power/Status
Context
Partnership Model
Motivation
Context
Potential Partners
CentralityTrust
Density
PartnershipsOutcomes
Context
#1
#2#3
Stage IAntecedents
Stage IIThe Developing Partnership
Stage IIIPartnership Capital
NetworkShared BeliefsShared Norms
Power/Resources/Intention
Power/Resources/Intention
Role of the Champion
Understands organization – culture, resources, politics
Acts as resource broker and networker Transformational leaders develop extensive
external networks to diverse set of contacts Understands own organizational and social
capital
Leadership is bringing together the right people at the right time in order to get the job done
Inviting People to the PartnershipDevelopment: Stage I – Antecedents
Antecedents
Motivation
Context
Potential Partners
CentralityTrust
Density
Negotiating and Defining the GroupStage II – The Developing Partnership
Partnerships Outcomes
Context
Partners
#1
#2#3Intentions
Resource
Rank/
Status
Power
Stage II—Conflicted Loyalties
Partnerships
#1
#2#3Institutional Disciplinary
Group
Sustainability/Outcomes/FailureStage III – Partnership Capital—
NetworkShared BeliefsShared Norms
Power/Resources/
Intention
Power/Resources/
IntentionPower/
Resources/Intention
Findings
Motivations matter
Social Capital of Champion/Partners Key
Conflict resolution makes or breaks the day
Context matters
Key Roles
Policy Makers Policy can impact institutional strategies Clarity is important Simple reporting central Enhanced feedback Address sustainability Workshops on conflict resolution
Institutions Prioritize strategies—but still support broad range Risk of lone ranger stance Sustainability
Key Roles
PartnersVision versus moneyRole of social/organizational capitalCreation of meaning for groupFramework and transparencyGovernanceLong-range planning
Conclusion
Money helps, but motivations differ Split loyalties lead to challenges Faculty rewards matter—need to address Risk of “one-shot” programming Consideration of partnering to what end
Case Study Analysis
2 groups for Case Study review “Haves”—Algonquin College; Mountain
College “Have-nots”—Downstate College; Cabin State
College; Northern College Review case questions—small groups Share larger group Lessons learned
Summary
MMI best practices
Framing the partnerships
Conflict negotiation
Lobbying efforts