A Level Law Learner resource 1 Introduction to the law of ... · Web viewLearner resource 1:...

6
Learner resource 1: Introduction to the law of torts This task includes information and terminology that will be required to understand the law of tort. The questions that follow ask you to link to earlier topics you have already studied, research a definition of ‘tort’ and define important terminology. Read the following information: Tort derives from the French word ‘wrong’. It is a collection of civil laws that have evolved since medieval times around the same time as contract laws were being developed. Proof of fault in negligence and torts which are an extension of negligence (occupiers’ liability and vicarious liability) require evidence and proof that the defendant is liable. This can make it difficult for the claimant to establish fault and can mean that they are unable to succeed in their claim. In the area of medical negligence, fault is notoriously difficult to prove. A claimant will have to provide evidence that a doctor has fallen below the standard of care expected of the ordinary reasonable doctor. ‘Taking on’ the medical profession in a legal battle makes this a difficult challenge in itself, so much so that there have been suggestions made to make such medical claims ‘no-fault’ although this proposals have never been adopted. Strict liability can be seen in the tort known as Rylands v Fletcher. Strict liability applied to torts where it is not necessary to show that the defendant was negligent or had intent to cause harm. Most torts have developed through the common law however, there has been some statutory intervention, namely the Occupiers’ Liability Act of 1957 and 1984. Public policy decisions can be seen in the law of tort where the judge will decide a case based on what is best for the whole of society rather than the individual parties in the case. This can also be linked to the ‘floodgates argument’ where by a decision is made to ensure that the courts will not be suddenly ‘flooded’ by cases. For example, the police cannot be sued by the family of a victim of crime who are blaming the Version 1 1 © OCR 2017 Law of Torts

Transcript of A Level Law Learner resource 1 Introduction to the law of ... · Web viewLearner resource 1:...

Page 1: A Level Law Learner resource 1 Introduction to the law of ... · Web viewLearner resource 1: Introduction to the law of torts This task includes information and terminology that will

Learner resource 1: Introduction to the law of tortsThis task includes information and terminology that will be required to understand the law of tort. The questions that follow ask you to link to earlier topics you have already studied, research a definition of ‘tort’ and define important terminology.

Read the following information:Tort derives from the French word ‘wrong’. It is a collection of civil laws that have evolved since medieval times around the same time as contract laws were being developed.

Proof of fault in negligence and torts which are an extension of negligence (occupiers’ liability and vicarious liability) require evidence and proof that the defendant is liable. This can make it difficult for the claimant to establish fault and can mean that they are unable to succeed in their claim. In the area of medical negligence, fault is notoriously difficult to prove. A claimant will have to provide evidence that a doctor has fallen below the standard of care expected of the ordinary reasonable doctor. ‘Taking on’ the medical profession in a legal battle makes this a difficult challenge in itself, so much so that there have been suggestions made to make such medical claims ‘no-fault’ although this proposals have never been adopted.

Strict liability can be seen in the tort known as Rylands v Fletcher. Strict liability applied to torts where it is not necessary to show that the defendant was negligent or had intent to cause harm.

Most torts have developed through the common law however, there has been some statutory intervention, namely the Occupiers’ Liability Act of 1957 and 1984.

Public policy decisions can be seen in the law of tort where the judge will decide a case based on what is best for the whole of society rather than the individual parties in the case. This can also be linked to the ‘floodgates argument’ where by a decision is made to ensure that the courts will not be suddenly ‘flooded’ by cases. For example, the police cannot be sued by the family of a victim of crime who are blaming the police for not catching a criminal sooner. This was decided in the landmark case of Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (1988) where the mother tried to claim that the police had negligently handled the investigation that led to the capture of the serial killer known as the Yorkshire Ripper. Hill claimed that if the police had done a better job, her daughter would not have been killed by the Ripper. It was held that the police were not responsible.

Justice is another theme which runs through the law of torts. The law tries to create fairness and can be used to evaluate the legal rules and theory. For example, why is it fair that an employer is responsible for the torts committed by his/her employees; or is it fair that a motorist may be deemed negligent even when they have not broken the speed limit?

Justice is particularly important in deciding if the defendant owes the claimant a duty of care. Part of the test used to establish this asks the court ‘is it just, fair and reasonable to impose a duty of care?’

Version 1 1 © OCR 2017Law of Torts

Page 2: A Level Law Learner resource 1 Introduction to the law of ... · Web viewLearner resource 1: Introduction to the law of torts This task includes information and terminology that will

Sometimes there is an overlap with the law of tort and the criminal law. For example, if a negligent motorist causes injury to another road user, the injured party will want to sue for compensation plus the police may wish to prosecute if there is evidence of dangerous driving e.g. the motorist was using their mobile phone.

The Human Rights Act 1998 also links to the law of tort. Article 8 ‘the right to respect for family and private life’ has connections to the land-based torts such as nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher, where land owners must ensure that their activities don’t infringe the rights of their neighbours. Article 2 ‘the right to life’ was also considered in the recent case of Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police (2015), details about which can be found by following the link in activity 3 ‘Negligence and Justice’.

Task: In the space below, write down all of the things you already know about civil law. Include examples, the courts, and terminology that would be used in a civil case:

Version 1 2 © OCR 2017Law of Torts

Page 3: A Level Law Learner resource 1 Introduction to the law of ... · Web viewLearner resource 1: Introduction to the law of torts This task includes information and terminology that will

Task: Research and find a definition of tort. Share with your class, agree on the best definition and write it in the box below:

Task: The text above refers to important legal terminology. Research and find a definition (and example if possible) of the following terms:

Term Definition

Strict liability

Fault-based liability

Common law

Version 1 3 © OCR 2017Law of Torts

Page 4: A Level Law Learner resource 1 Introduction to the law of ... · Web viewLearner resource 1: Introduction to the law of torts This task includes information and terminology that will

Term Definition

Statutory law

Public policy

Justice

Floodgates argument

Human Rights Act 1998

Extension question/task: Research the case of Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (1988).

Version 1 4 © OCR 2017Law of Torts