A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

29
A kick-start to HEC-RAS models Kim Draper, E.I., CFM Water & Environmental Technologies Butte, MT Great Falls, MT

Transcript of A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Page 1: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

A kick-start to HEC-RAS models Kim Draper, E.I., CFM Water & Environmental Technologies Butte, MT Great Falls, MT

Page 2: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Presentation Overview Helpful Hints for all HEC-RAS models Tramway Gulch / Reese Canyon Creek

Site Overview Reese Split Flow & Floodway Reese Bridge Routine – No-Rise Reese Levee

Page 3: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Guidance Documents HEC-RAS Hydraulic Manual HEC-RAS Applications Guide HEC-RAS Users Manual

FEMA Guidelines and Specifications Michael Baker Corp. PowerPoint http://www.dnrc.mt.gov/wrd/water_op/floodplain/fp_eng_101

/3-lomc-lomr.pdf

Page 4: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Cross Section Placement At bridge and culvert routines, four cross sections are required.

Hydraulic Reference Manual, Appendix B Guidance calculations for bridge openings 100 – 500 feet span, and Q = 5,000 – 30,000 cfs

Page 5: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Flow width fully expanded

Flow width fully expanded

Cross section 2 & 3 should not be one foot from culvert; good starting range is 5-8 feet from culvert

Cross section #1

Cross section # 2

Cross section # 3

Cross section # 4

Road / Highway

Page 6: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Error Messages – Mid- modeling check cHECk-RAS View detailed output at bridges, culverts,

weirs, etc. Summary of errors, warnings, and notes HEC-geoRAS

Page 7: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Reese & Tramway

Page 8: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Rees

e Sp

lit F

low

Page 9: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Shal

low

Ove

rland

Flo

w

Page 10: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Shal

low

Ove

rland

Flo

w

Page 11: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Shal

low

Ove

rland

Flo

w

Page 12: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Split

Flo

w O

ptim

izatio

n

Opportunity to clean up model – overlapping cross sections

Flow results in Main Channel Q100 = 30% of total flow Qbaseflow = negligible flow

Page 13: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Late

ral W

eir

Page 14: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Late

ral W

eir

Flow results in Main Channel Q100

= 52% of total flow

Qbaseflow = 75% of total flow

Page 15: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Floodway and Split Flow Appendix C Guidance:

1) Regulatory floodway in both channels 2) Floodway in single channel if difference of

WSELs is ≤ 0.5 feet between model with reduced flow and model with full flow

i.e. WSELQ=37cfs ≤ 0.5 feet + WSELQ=19 cfs

Page 16: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Bridge Routine – No-Rise

Page 17: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Wow! A rise?? Initial modeling checks:

Sensitivity to bridge span and height Realistic manning’s “n” values Effect of bridge on channel velocity Review slope and cross sectional area at

upstream and downstream cross sections Review warnings, error messages and notes Run cHECk-RAS to verify modeling method

Page 18: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Class B Low Flow HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual

Page 19: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Computation Methods Cannot force energy equation in a bridge

routine; default is momentum method

Critical Depth assigned to either u/s or d/s internal bridge xs

Momentum Equation to compute WSEL above critical depth

Page 20: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Alternatives in HEC-RAS Critical depth output option and

computational method

Page 21: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Alternatives in HEC-RAS Add iterations Modify tolerance

Page 22: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Alternatives in HEC-RAS Friction and weight component within the

momentum equation

Page 23: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Alternatives in HEC-RAS Download HEC-RAS version 3.3.1 and re-

run model HEC-RAS v3.3.1 still bound to Class B Low

Flow defaults

Page 24: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Alternatives in HEC-RAS It all comes down to Manning’s Eqn!

Discuss model approach with DNRC & Michael Baker, Corp.

Model Overbank Manning’s “n” Range

Channel Manning’s “n”

Range

Current Conditions 0.045 – 0.075 0.040 – 0.060

Forced Model Conditions to show No Rise 0.060 – 0.098 0.055 – 0.090

Page 25: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Reese & Tramway Hillcrest 1963 FIRM 1979

Page 26: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

The Reese Levee Guidelines and Specifications, Appendix H NFIP – 44 CFR 65.10 minimum standards

Freeboard – 3+ feet above 1% annual-chance BFE

Structural analysis to address closures, embankment protection

Embankment & foundation stability analyses Operation & Maintenance Plan

Page 27: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Levee Modeling Options Guidelines and Specifications, App. H If the subject does not meet the requirements stated in Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations, the Mapping Partner shall recompute the 1-% –annual-chance flood elevations as if the levee did not exist. If the “with levee” base flood elevations are higher than the “without levee” BFEs, the Mapping Partner shall show a line running along the levee centerline, separating the areas of different BFEs, on the FIRM. Otherwise, the Mapping Partner shall show only “without levee” BFEs on the FIRM.

Page 28: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models
Page 29: A kick-start to HEC-RAS models

Thank you Water & Environmental Technologies

Crew Steve Story & John Connors, DNRC Jaclyn Bloor, Colin McKernan, Michael

Baker, Corp. Steve Hess, BSB Floodplain Administrator All of you!