A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal)....

32
A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health A concise desktop handbook Prepared for Public Health Wales by Dr Joanna Charles and Prof Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Bangor University

Transcript of A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal)....

Page 1: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health A concise desktop handbook

Prepared for Public Health Wales by Dr Joanna Charles and Prof Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Bangor University

Page 2: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

1

Contents

Page

1. Purpose of this handbook 2

2.Definitionsofkeyhealtheconomicsterminology 2

3.Whatishealtheconomics? 5

4.Purposeofeconomicevaluation 6

5.Methodsofeconomicevaluation 6

6.SocialReturnonInvestment(SROI) 14

7.Criticalappraisalofeconomicevaluationsand decisionanalyticalmodels 17

8.Usefulhealtheconomicsresources 27

Page 3: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

2

1. Purpose of this concise desktop handbookThishandbook,writtenbyhealtheconomistsatBangorUniversityisintendedtoprovideanintroductionanddefinekeyeconomicterms,sothatthosewithouthealtheconomicsexpertisecanbetterunderstandandappraiseeconomicevidence.Inparticular,weareawarethatyoumayneedtofindandinterpreteconomicevidence;thishandbookisaquickreferenceguidetokeymethodsandterminology.

Boldkeytermsinthehandbookaredescribedindetailinthe“Definitions”sectionbelow.

2. Definitions of key health economics terminology ListcompiledfromBergeretal.,(2003);Passetal.,(1993)andtheBMJ(2012).

Allocative efficiency–allocationofresourcesbetweentypesofhealthservicesinawaythatresultsinmaximumgaintoallparties.

Cost-benefit analysis–comparesthecostsandbenefitsofanintervention,procedureorprogrammeinmonetaryterms.

Cost-consequence analysis–describesthecostsandoutcomesofaninterventioninadisaggregatedform.

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve –thecurveillustratestheprobabilityof‘interventionA’beingmorecost-effectivethan‘interventionB’givenarangeofvaluesthatadecision-makermayattachtoanadditionalqualityadjustedlifeyeartoreflectuncertaintyintheestimates.

Cost-effectiveness analysis–costsarecomparedwithatreatment’scommontherapeuticgoal,expressedintermsofonemainoutcomemeasuredinnaturalunits(e.g.,improvementinbloodpressureorcholesterollevel).

Cost-effectiveness plane–agraphicrepresentationoftheIncrementalcost-effectivenessratio.SeeIncrementalcost-effectivenessratiodefinitionbelow.

Cost-minimisation analysis–amethodofevaluationutilisedwhentheintervention,proceduresorprogrammesareexpectedtohaveexactlythesameoutcome.Theanalysisthenidentifiesthelesscostlyoption.

Page 4: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

3

Cost-utility analysis–amethodofevaluationthatmeasureshealthbenefitsinpreference-basednon-monetaryunitssuchasQualityAdjustedLifeYears(QALYs)orDisabilityAdjustedLifeYears(DALYs).

Decision analysis–astructuredwayofthinkingabouthowanactiontakeninacurrentdecisionwouldleadtoaresult,constructedasalogicalmodeldescribingtherelationshipsbetweeninputsandresults.

Decision analytic modelling–amodellingtechniqueusedtoestimatethecosts,outcomesandcost-effectivenessofdifferentinterventionsandprogrammesinhealthcareandpublichealth.

Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs)–usedtogeneratehealthrelatedmeasuresofutilityforthoselivingwithadisabilitymeasuredintermsoftimelostduetoprematuredeath(mortality)andtimelivedwithadisability(morbidity).

Discounting–amethodofincorporatingpositivetimepreference(highervaluegiventocostsandbenefitsthatoccurnow,comparedtothoseoccurringinthefuture)intotheevaluationwhenthecostsandbenefitsdonotoccurinthesametimeperiod.

Discount rate–theratechosentoexpressthestrengthofpreferenceovertimingofcostsandbenefits.Since2003theTreasuryrecommendsa3.5%discountrate.TocheckthediscountrateconsulttheHMTreasuryGreenBook.

Direct medical costs–associatedwiththeservice/programmeunderconsideration.Theseareorganisationalandoperationalcostsbornebythehealthsector(e.g.,healthprofessionals’time,supplies,equipment,poweretc).

Direct nonmedical costs–incurredbypatient/familiesinthecourseoftreatment(e.g.,transportcosts,parking).

Health capital-definedbyGrossman(1972)asthepresentvalueofaperson’slifetimehealth.

Herd immunity–aformofindirectprotectionfrominfectiousdiseasesthatoccurswhenalargepercentageofthepopulationbecomesimmunetoaninfectionandconsequentlyprovidesameasureofprotectiontothosewhoarenotimmune.

Incremental cost–thedifferencebetweenthecostsofoneinterventionandthecostsofitscomparator/alternative.

Page 5: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

4

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)–obtainedbydividingthedifferencebetweenthecostsofthetwointerventionsbythedifferenceintheoutcomes,i.e.theextracostperextraunitofoutcome.

Indirect costs–lossesinproductionduetoabsencefromwork.Indirectcostscanalsofallonpeopleotherthanthepersonreceivingtreatment,forexample,othermembersofthefamilymayneedtotaketimeoffworktotakeafamilymembertothelocalGPclinicorA&Edepartment.

Intangible costs–non-physicalcoststothepatientandtheirfamiliesfromillhealthsuchaspainandanxiety.

Marginal costs–theadditionalcostincreasesorsavingsarisingasaconsequenceofsmalloutputchangeswithinahealthcareprogramme.Importanttoconsideraspartofresourceallocationalongsidewiderconsiderationssuchascapacity,staffingandequipment.

Opportunity cost–thevalueofbenefitsforegonebynotusingresourcesintheirnextbestalternativeuse.

Perspective–thepointofviewfromwhichananalysisisconducted(e.g.,publicsectororsocietal).

Positive externalities–abenefitthatisenjoyedbyathird-partyasaresultofaneconomictransaction(e.g.,herdimmunitythroughvaccinationprogrammes).

Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)–calculatedbyaggregatingthenumberofyearsgainedfromadrugorhealthcareintervention,weightedbyaproportionthatrepresentstherelativevalueattachedtoagivenhealthstateofqualityoflifeinthoseyears.

Sensitivity analysis–analysisthatteststherobustnessofaneconomicmodelbyexaminingthechangesinresultswhenadjustingkeyparameters.

Social Return on Investment (SROI) –analysisthat resultsinaratioofbenefitstocosts,estimatingthevaluecreatedforevery£1invested.

Technical efficiency–theuseofhealthcareresourcesinsuchawaythatmaximisesoutputfromgivenresourcesorminimisesresourceuseforagivenlevelofoutput.

Page 6: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

5

3. What is health economics?Healtheconomicsisasub-disciplineofeconomics,whichisthestudyofhowsocietyusesscarceresourcestomeetitswantsandneeds.

Healtheconomicsviewshealthandhealthcareasaneconomicgood(asingoodsandservices)andispredominatelyconcernedwithhowsocietyusesscarcehealthcareresourcestomeetthesewantsandneeds.

Therearethreebasiceconomicquestions:

1. Whatgoodsandservicestoproduce?

2. Howcanweproducegoodsandservices?

3. Howshouldwedistributegoodsandservicesbetweenmembersofsociety?

Economicprinciplesareappliedtohealthandhealthcarebecause;

- Resourcesarefinite(e.g.thereareonlysomanydoctorsandlocalcommunityservicessuchasGPsurgeriesandpharmaciesthatareopengenerallyduringbusinesshours)

- Incontrast,demandforhealthandhealthcareisinfinite

- Tocreateabalancebetweenfiniteresourcesandinfinitewantsandneeds,choicesarenecessaryandconsequentlycostsandbenefitsmustbecompared

- Prioritisationisalsorequiredforinvestmentanddisinvestment(e.g.doyouutiliseyourscarceresourcestoimplementinterventionstoincreasephysicalexerciseorreducetobaccoconsumption?)

Publichealthandhealthcareisdifferenttohowothergoodsandservicesoperateinamarketbecause:

- Individualill-healthisunpredictable(individualsarenotabletocontrolwhentheywillfallill,howlongitwilltakethemtorecoverorhowserioustheillnessis)

- Thereareindirectconsequencestopublichealthandhealthcare,theseincludepositive externalities(wherebyabenefitisenjoyedbyathird-partyasaresultofaneconomictransaction)suchasherd immunitythroughvaccinationprogrammes

- Consumershavelimitedknowledge.Theyrelyuponproviders(e.g.doctors,nurses,socialworkers,etc)toprovidehealthcare,

Page 7: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

6

medicines,information,interventionsandreferralstospecialistservicesifrequired

- Doctors,nurses,socialworkers,etcactas“gatekeepers”,decidingwhorequiresandreceivestreatment,andwhattypeoftreatmenttheyreceive

- Thereareeducationalandfinancialbarrierstoentryintothemedicalprofession,thusmaintaininglimitedconsumerknowledgeinthegeneralpopulation

- Thedemandforhealthcareisaderiveddemand,createdfromthedemandforhealth.Consumerstypicallywantmorehealth capitalandinordertoachievethis,individualsallocateresourcesinordertobothconsumeandproducehealth(e.g.byengaginginhealthpromotionactivitiessuchaslifestylechanges)

4. Purpose of economic evaluationHealtheconomicsisinterestedintheinterplaybetweencostsandoutcomes/benefits.Economicevaluationtechniquesprovideaframeworkforidentifyingthecostsandbenefitsofdifferenthealthinterventions.Weconducteconomicevaluations,asweneedtoconsiderscarcityofresourcesandopportunity costs-thevalueofbenefitsforegonebynotusingresourcesintheirnextbestalternativeuse.

5. Methods of economic evaluationTherearefivemainmethodsofeconomicevaluation:

• Cost-Minimisation Analysis (CMA)

• Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA)

• Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA)

• Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)

• Cost-Consequence Analysis (CCA)

Therearealsoalternativetechniqueswhichincludetheconsiderationofcostsandoutcomes,butgenerallythefivemethodslistedabovearemostcommonlyused.ArangeofmethodsarelistedinTable1.

Page 8: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

7

Method FullorPartialEconomicEvaluationCost-MinimisationAnalysis(CMA)

Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis(CEA)

Cost-UtilityAnalysis(CUA)

Cost-BenefitAnalysis(CBA)

FullEconomicEvaluations

Theycomparealternativeservices/procedures/interventionsintermsofboththeircostsandoutcomes/effects/benefits.Itisworthnotingthateachmethodmeasuresoutcomesdifferently

Cost-ConsequenceAnalysis(CCA)

Cost-analyses

Cost-descriptionstudies

Cost-outcomedescriptions

PartialEconomicEvaluations

Theyfocussolelyoncostsorresourcesused

Table1.Methodsusedinhealtheconomicscategorisedbywhetherornottheywouldbeconsideredfullorpartialeconomicevaluations.

Eachmethodofeconomicevaluationisdescribedinturnbelow,withlimitationshighlightedandanexamplepaperlisteddemonstratingthemethod.

5.1 Cost-minimisation analysis (CMA)

Cost-minimisation analysisisaformofeconomicevaluationusedwhenaninterventionorserviceanditsalternative(e.g.usualcareorcurrentpractice)achieveoutcomesthatarethesame(Brazieretal.,2007;Robinson,1993a).Underthesecircumstances,cost-minimisationanalysisaimstoidentifytheleastcostlyoption(Brazieretal.,2007,Robinson,1993a).

Limitationsofcost-minimisationanalysis

Inpractice,itisdifficulttofindinterventionsorserviceswiththesameoutcomes,asthereisoftenuncertaintyaroundtheoutcomemeasureofchoice(Brazieretal.,2007).Theuseofcost-minimisationanalysishighlightsquestionsaboutthegatheringofcostdatasuchas,whatperspectiveshouldbechosen.Forexample,apublicsectorperspectivewouldincludecostsaccruedbyprimarycareandNHSsecondarycare,personalsocialservicesandlocalgovernment.Asocietalperspectivewouldincludecostssuchasprovidercostsofequipmentandstaff,

Page 9: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

8

individualcostsoflostwages,travelandcoststorelativessuchaschildcarecostsortransport.Otherquestionstoconsiderincludeshouldcostsreflectopportunitycostsandshouldonetakeaccountoftheeffectsofinflationanddiscounting.Discountingisamethodofincorporatingpositivetimepreference(highervaluegiventocostsandbenefitsthatoccurnow,comparedtothoseoccurringinthefuture)intotheevaluationwhenthecostsandbenefitsdonotoccuratthesametimeperiod.

Exampleofcost-minimisationanalysisinpractice

JonesJ,WilsonA,ParkerH,WynnA,JaggerC,SpiersN,ParkerG.(1999).Economicevaluationofhospitalathomeversushospitalcare:costminimisationanalysisofdatafromrandomisedcontrolledtrial.BMJ,319(7224),1547–1550.

5.2 Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)

Cost-effectiveness analysiscomparesthecostsofalternativeprocedures,servicesorinterventionswithatreatment’scommontherapeuticgoal,expressedintermsofonemainoutcomemeasuredinnaturalunits(e.g.,improvementinbloodpressureorcholesterollevel)(Bergeretal.,2003).

Anincremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)isusedinthismethod.AnICERcalculatesthedifferenceincostsbetweenoneinterventionandanalternative,dividedbythedifferenceinoutcomes(OHE,2008).Effectivenessdataistypicallycollectedfromeconomicevaluationsalongsideclinicaltrialsorrandomisedcontrolledtrials(Robinson,1993b).

AnICERcanalsobeillustratedgraphicallyusingadiagramnamedthecost-effectiveness plane, shown in Figure 1.

Thehorizontalaxisrepresentsthedifferenceineffectbetweentheintervention(I)andthealternative(A).Theverticalaxisrepresentsthedifferenceincostbetweentheinterventionandthealternative.

IfpointIfallsintheNorthEast(NE)quadrant,theinterventionismoreeffectiveandmorecostlythanthealternative(pointA).

IfpointIfallsintheSouthWest(SW)quadrant,theinterventionislesseffectiveandlesscostlythanthealternative(pointA).

IfpointIfallsintheSouthEast(SE)quadrant,theinterventionismoreeffectiveandlesscostlythanthealternative(pointA).Inotherwordsitdominates,(i.e.prevailsover)thealternativeandwouldbeconsideredcost-effective.

Page 10: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

9

IfpointIisintheNorthWest(NW)quadrant,theinterventionislesseffectiveandmorecostlythanthealternative(pointA).

IfpointAfallsineithertheNEandSWquadrants,thechoiceofwhethertoimplementtheinterventionorthealternativedependsuponthemaximumcost-effectivenessratiooneiswillingtoaccept.TheslopeofthelineIAgivesthecost-effectivenessratio.

Figure1.Examplecost-effectivenessplaneadaptedfromBlack(1990).

Anamendedversionofthecost-effectivenessplanediagramfromBlack,W.C.(1990)”.TheCEPlane:AGraphicRepresentationofCost-Effectiveness.MedicalDecisionMakingVol.10(3)pp.212-214.Copyright©1990bySocietyforMedicalDecisionMaking.ReprintedbypermissionofSAGEPublications,Inc

Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curves (CEACs)

CEACsillustratetheuncertaintysurroundingtheestimateofcost-effectiveness.ACEAC(Figure2)showstheprobabilitythataninterventioniscost-effectivecomparedwiththealternativeforarangeofceilingratiosorthresholdsthatadecision-makermightbewillingtopayforaparticularunitofoutcomes.CaremustbetakenwheninterpretingtheinformationprovidedbyaCEAC.Itsimplypresentstheprobabilitythataninterventioniscost-effectivecomparedwiththealternativeforarangeofvalues.TheCEACshouldnot beusedtomakestatementsabouttheimplementationoftheintervention(Fenwick&Byford,2005).

Page 11: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

10

Figure2.Examplecost-effectivenessacceptabilitycurve(CEAC).

Figure2demonstratesat£7,500perQALY,theprobabilityoftheinterventionbeingcost-effectiveis50%.

Awordofcautionregardingcost-effectivenessanalysis

Itisworthnotingthattheperspectiveofananalysisiskeywhenperformingcost-effectivenessanalysis.

Iftheperspectiveisrestrictedanddoesnotcoveralltherelevantstakeholders/payers,thenthiscanleadtocostshiftingfromonepartofthesystemtoanotherorfromoneagencytoanother,ratherthanprovidingacost-effectivesolution.Toreducethelikelihoodofthisoccurring,researchersshoulduseascomprehensiveaperspectiveaspossible(Bergeretal.,2003).Forpublichealthevaluations,theNationalInstituteforHealthandCareExcellence(NICE)recommendapublicsectorperspective(NICE,2012).

Page 12: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

11

Exampleofcost-effectivenessanalysisinpractice

EdwardsRT,CéilleachairA,BywaterT,HughesDA,HutchingsJ.(2007).Parentingprogrammeforparentsofchildrenatriskofdevelopingconductdisorder:costeffectivenessanalysis.BMJ,334(7595),682.

OwenL,MorganA,FischerA,EllisS,HoyA,KellyMP.(2012).Thecost-effectivenessofpublichealthinterventions.JournalofPublicHealth,34(1),37-45.

5.3 Cost-utility analysis (CUA)

Cost-utility analysisisanextensionofcost-effectivenessanalysis.Itisaformofeconomicevaluationinwhichhealthbenefitsareusuallymeasuredinpreference-basednon-monetaryunitssuchasQuality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) or Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). QALYsarecalculatedbyaggregatingthenumberofyearsgainedfromadrugorhealthcareintervention,weightedbytheproportionthatrepresentstherelativevalueattachedtoagivenhealthstate(utility)(Robinson,1993c).DALYsarecalculatedbyaggregatingthetimelostduetoprematuredeathandtimelivedwithadisability.

Healthutilityscorestypicallyrangebetween0(death)and1(perfecthealth).OneQALYisequaltooneyearoflifelivedinperfecthealth.Therearehealthstateswithnegativevalues,whichwouldbeconsideredworsethandeath.Therearemanymeasuresavailabletoproduceutilityscores,(e.g.EQ-5D,EuroQolGroup1990;SF-36,Brazieretal.,1992;HUI,Horsmanetal.,2003).Thechoiceofmeasureisbasedupontheresearchquestion,suitabilityforthepopulationunderstudyandpreviousliterature.Anindividualmaychoosetouseaparticularmeasureinordertoallowcomparabilitywithpreviouslypublishedstudies.

Limitationsofcost-utilityanalysis

ThereareequityissuesassociatedwithQALYs.Aslengthoflifeisusedintheequation,itisarguedthattheyounggainmoreQALYsduetothefacttheyhavemorelifelefttolivethantheelderly.Thus,resourceallocationbaseduponthemaximisationofQALYswouldcausearedistributionofhealthcareresourcesawayfromtheelderly,favouringtheyoung(Wagstaff,1991).Kellyetal.,(2005)andWeatherlyetal.,(2009)have

QALY=lengthoflifexqualityoflife

DALY=yearslivedwithdisability+yearsoflifelost

Page 13: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

12

arguedthattheQALYapproachmaybetoonarrowtocapturethefullrangeofbenefitsfrompublichealthinterventions.Thoughmultiplemeasuresexisttogenerateutilityscores,itisworthnotingthatdifferentmeasuresproducedifferentutilityscores,makingcomparisonswithotherstudiessometimesdifficult.Considerationofthepopulationandplanstocomparethestudywithotherpublishedstudiesshouldbeundertakenbeforechoosingaparticularutilitymeasure.

Exampleofcost-utilityanalysisinpractice

EdwardsRT,LinckP,HounsomeN,RaisanenL,WilliamsN,MooreLMurphyS.(2013).Cost-effectivenessofanationalexercisereferralprogrammeforprimarycarepatientsinWales:resultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial.BMCPublicHealth,13(1),1021.

UseofICERsinEconomicEvaluationssuchasCUAandCEA

IntheUK,governingbodiessuchasNICEuseICERSapplyingaceilingratio/thresholdtodetermineifanintervention,programmeorserviceiscost-effective.NICEtypicallyusecostperQALYequationstodeterminecost-effectiveness.NICE(2008)statestheQALYshouldbeusedbecauseitisastandardisedandinternationallyrecognisedmethodtocompareandmeasureclinicaleffectivenessandcost-effectivenessacrossdifferenttreatmentsandpatientgroups.IntheUK,theceilingratiohasbeensuggestedat£20,000-£30,000perQALY(NICE,2008).IntheUSA,theceilingratioissetat$50,000perQALY,andbetweenA$42,000-A$76,000perQALYinAustralia(Eichleretal.,2004).

5.4Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)

Cost-benefit analysisplacesmonetaryvaluesonbothcostsandoutcomes.Itaimstoanswerthequestionisthebenefitworththecost(Morrisetal.,2007).However,itcanonlyvaluetangibleoutcomese.g.money.Itstrugglestovalueintangibleoutcomes,whichareyettobequantifiede.g.happiness,relieffrompain.Inevaluationsofhealthcareservicesorprocedures,theuseofmonetaryvaluesallowsyoutodetermineifaserviceorprocedureoffersanoverallgaintosocietyifitstotalbenefitssurpassitstotalcosts(Robinson,1993d;Brazieretal.,2007;McIntoshetal.,2010).

Benefitsinthismethodcanbevaluedusingthehumancapitalapproach,anapproachthatvaluesbenefitsintermsofproductivitygainsorbyindividual’spreferencesusingwillingnesstopay(Robinson,1993d)orwillingnesstoaccept(Drummond&McGuire,2007).

Page 14: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

13

Willingnesstopayrequiresaskingindividualshowmuchtheywouldbepreparedtopaytoobtainthebenefitsoravoidthecosts(e.g.,moneyornegativeeffects)ofillness(Robinson,1993d;Brazieretal.,2007;McIntoshetal.,2010).Willingnesstoacceptrequiresaskingindividualshowmuchtheywouldaccepttobepaidtoabandonagoodorputupwithsomethingnegative(e.g.,side-effectsfromamedicationthatreducedothersymptoms)(Drummond&McGuire,2007).Willingnesstopayandwillingnesstoacceptareoftendependentuponhowtheindividualvaluesmoneyitself,aswellastheirvaluationofbenefitsandnegativeeffects(Robinson,1993d).

Limitationsofcost-benefitanalysis

Byusingthesameoutcomemeasure(costs/money),themethodallowsyoutocompareinterventionsthatcanbeunrelated(e.g.smokingcessationinterventionandaphysicalactivityinterventionasbothaimtobenefitpopulationhealth)(Bergeretal.,2003).However,inordertoconvertnon-monetaryoutcomesintocosts,assumptionsarerequired.Dependingontheoutcome,theevaluationcouldbebasedonratherlargeassumptions.Inordertoperformtheanalysis,theseassumptionswillberequired.Researchersshouldbetransparentintheirassumptionsandtestthemthroughsensitivityanalyses.Cost-benefitanalysishasalsobeencriticisedforgivinggreaterweighttothepreferencesofthewealthy(Bergeretal.,2003).Itisworthnotingthataskingindividualstoapplymonetaryvaluestooutcomeswillberootedintheircircumstancesandrelativetotheirownearnings-whatisexpensivetoonepersonwouldnotnecessarilybeconsideredexpensivebyanother.

Examplepaperofcost-benefitanalysisinpractice

ReynoldsAJ,TempleJA,RobertsonDL,MannEA.(2002).Age21Cost-BenefitAnalysisoftheTitleIChicagoChild-ParentCenters.EducationalEvaluationandPolicyAnalysis,24,267-303.

5.5 Cost-consequence analysis (CCA)

Cost-consequence analysiscollects,categorisesandliststhecostcomponentsofachosenintervention(Brazieretal.,2007).Thistypeofanalysisliststhecomponentsofaninterventioninadisaggregatedformat,withoutmakingjudgementsoftheirrelativeimportance.Theverdictislefttothedecisionmaker(Brazieretal.,2007).Byprovidingtheinformationinthisformat,thedecisionmakercanfocusuponthe

Page 15: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

14

outcomesthataremostimportantorsalienttothem(Bergeretal.,2003).Thebiggestcriticismofcost-consequenceanalysisisthatithasnoweightingsystemtoappraisetheresults.Costsandconsequencesarepresenteddisaggregated,requiringthedecisionmakersthemselvestodeviseasystemtoappraisetheresults(Bergeretal.,2003).Thesedecisions,madeatanindividuallevel,maynotalwaysbeinthebestinterestofthepatientsorsociety.

Examplepaperofcost-consequenceanalysisinpractice

GageH,KayeJ,OwenC,TrendP,Wade,D.(2006).Evaluatingrehabilitationusingcost-consequencesanalysis:anexampleinParkinson’sdisease.ClinicalRehabilitation,20,232-238.

5.6Generalconsiderationsforallevaluationmethods

WhenreadingtheresultsoftheeconomicevaluationmethodsinSection5,therearefewkeypointstonote.TheDrummondChecklist(Drummondetal.,2015)highlightskeypointstobeawareofwhenreadinganeconomicevaluation-inaddition,wewishtoemphasisethefollowing:

Perspective–Theperspectiveshouldbestatedandyou-asthereader-shouldcriticallyappraiseifthisperspectivecoversallrelevantcostsandoutcomes.

Sensitivity analysis–Sensitivityanalysesshouldbeconductedtoexploretheextenttowhichassumptionsmadeintheanalysisareupheld,whilstadjustingkeyvariables(e.g.,dosageofinterventionreceived).

Discounting–Discountingincorporatespositivetimepreference–meaningbenefitsthatoccurnowarevaluedhigherthanthosethatoccurinthefuture.TheTreasuryrecommendsadiscount rate of3.5%.Costsandoutcomesthatoccurafter1yearshouldbediscountedbyapplyingthediscountratetoaccountforpositivetimepreference.

6. Social Return on Investment (SROI)Social Return on Investment (SROI)analysis,whichiscommonintheUSA,isbecomingofinteresttoUKpolicymakers,localservicecommissionersandcharities.Themethodresultsinaratioofbenefitstocosts,estimatingthevaluecreatedforevery£1invested.

ThecentralpurposeofSROIistoaddressthechallengeofmeasuringa

Page 16: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

15

widerconceptofvalue,capturingaspectsacrossthetriplebottomlineofeconomic,socialandenvironmentalvalue.SROIinvolvesastakeholderconsultationfromtheoutsetandthroughouttheprocesstohelpestablishboundaries,indicatorsandverifyassumptionsmadeintheanalysis.

TheCabinetOffice(2011)havepublished‘AGuidetoSocialReturnonInvestment’.Thisguideprovidesstep-by-stepinstructionsonhowtoconductanaccurateSROI.Itwasproducedtohelpthirdsectororganisationsbettercommunicatetheirimpacttothepublic,fundersandtheGovernment.

TheguideoutlinessixkeystagestoconductinganSROIanalysis,whicharepresentedbelow.

ThesixstagestoSROIasstatedbyTheCabinetOffice(2011).

Stage Briefdescriptionofactivityundertakenduringthatstage

1 Establishing scope and identifying key stakeholders

- Beclearaboutwhoisdirectlyimpactedbytheinterventionorservice

- Whatimpacthastheinterventionhad?

- Howwillthesestakeholdersbeconsultedduringtheprocess?

2 Map outcomes

- Engagewithstakeholderstodevelopanimpactmaportheoryofchangewhichisadiagramthatshowstherelationshipbetweeninputs,outputsandoutcomes

- Inputsarewhatastakeholderputsintoanintervention(e.g.timetoattendanexerciseclassaspartofanintervention)

- Outputsareevidencethatanactivityhastakenplace(e.g.numberofhoursconductingexerciseorsessionsattended)

- Outcomesareevidencethatachangehastakenplace(e.g.improvementsinphysicalhealthfromtheintervention)

Page 17: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

16

Stage Briefdescriptionofactivityundertakenduringthatstage

3 Evidencing outcomes and giving them a value

- Finddatafrompublishedsourcesorcollectowndatatoshowwhetheroutcomeshavehappenedandvalueoutcomes

4 Establishing impact

- Aftercollectingevidenceonoutcomes,assignamonetaryvaluetotheseoutcomes

- Alsoestablishwhatchangeswouldhavehappenedwithouttheintervention(i.e.whathappenedinacontrolconditionorasaresultofusualcare)

- Aretherechangesfromoutsidefactorsorotheractivitythatarenotdirectlyattributabletotheintervention?(e.g.istheimprovementseeninphysicalhealthjustfromtheinterventionorhastheparticipantbeenengaginginexerciseoutsidetheintervention–forexampledailywalks)

- Howlongareeffectslikelytolast?

5 Calculating the SROI

- Thisstageinvolvesaddingupallthebenefits,subtractinganynegativesandcomparingtheresulttotheinvestment.Thisisalsowherethesensitivityoftheresultscanbetested

6 Reporting, using and embedding

- Sharefindingswithstakeholdersandrespondtoanycommentsorsuggestions

- Beclearonyouraudience

- Createatechnicalappendixdetailingassumptionsandcalculations

- Verifyresultsthroughanassuranceprocessorworkwithanexperttoimprovecreditability

Page 18: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

17

7. Critical appraisal of economic evaluations and decision analytical models

7.1 TheDrummondetal.,(2015)ChecklistforaSoundEconomicEvaluation

Inordertoassesstheresultsofapublishedeconomicevaluation,Drummondetal.,(2015)developedachecklisttoidentifyelementstheyconsideredtodemonstrateasoundeconomicevaluation.Itisworthnotingthatitisunlikelythateverystudywillsatisfyallthepointsraisedinthechecklist.However,thechecklistprovidesaguidetothetypesofquestionsoneshouldbeaskingwhenreadingpublishedeconomicevaluations,sotheycanassessthestrengthsandweaknessesofthestudyandmaketheirownjudgementoftheusefulnessandrelevanceofthefindingsfortheirpurposes.Thechecklistquestionsarepresentedbelow.

TheDrummondChecklistcomprisesof10mainquestions(adaptedfromDrummondetal.,2015)

TheDrummondChecklistadaptedfromDrummondetal(2015)MethodsfortheEconomicEvaluationofHealthCareProgrammespp.42-44.Copyright©2015OxfordUniversityPress.ReprintedbypermissionfromOxfordUniversityPress.ThisreprintedOxfordUniversityPresscontentisexcludedfromtheHandbook’sCreativeCommonslicense.AnyonewishingtousethematerialoutsideofthishandbookneedstocontactOxfordUniversityPressforpermission(http://global.oup.com/?cc=gb)

1. Wasawell-definedquestionposedinananswerableform?

- Werebothcostsandeffectsexamined?

- Werealternativesconsidered?

- Wastheperspectiveoftheanalysisstated?Istheanalysisembeddedinanydecisionmakingcontext?

2. Wasacomprehensivedescriptionofthecompetingalternativesgiven?

- Wereanyalternativesthatwererelevanttoevaluationomitted?

- Wasado-nothingalternativeconsideredorshoulditbe?

Page 19: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

18

3. Wastheeffectivenessoftheprogrammesorservicesestablished?

- Wasthisdonethrougharandomisedcontrolledtrial?Didthetrialreflectwhathappensinusualcareorroutinepractice?

- Wasthisdonethoughasystematicreviewofevidencefromclinicalstudies?Ifso,wasthesearchstrategyincludinginclusionandexclusioncriteriaclearlydescribed?

- Wereobservationaldataorassumptionsusedwhenestablishingeffectiveness?Ifso,arethereanypotentialbiasesintheresults?

4. Werealltheimportantandrelevantcostsandconsequencesforeachalternativeidentified?

- Wastherangewide-enoughfortheresearchquestionathand?

- Wereallrelevantperspectivescovered(e.g.,community,NHS,patient)?

- Werecapitalcostsaswellasoperatingcostsincluded?

Capitalcostsareone-timeexpensestypicallyincurredtosetupaservice

Operatingcostsaretherecurrentdeliverycostsofaservice,e.g.staff

5. Werecostsandeffectsmeasuredaccuratelyinappropriatephysicalunits(e.g.,QALYs)?

- Weresourcesofserviceutilisationdescribedandacceptable?

- Wereanyitemsomitted?Ifso,whateffectdoesthishaveontheanalysis?

- Werethereanyspecialcircumstancesthatmademeasurementdifficult?Werethesedifficultiesaddressed?

Page 20: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

19

6. Werecostsandeffectsvaluedcredibly?

- Wereallsourcesofthevaluesclearlyidentified?

- Weremarketvaluesemployedforchangesinvolvingresourcesgainedordepleted?

- Wheremarketvalueswereabsent(e.g.volunteerlabour)ormarketvaluesdidnotreflectactualvalues(e.g.equipmentgivenatareducedrate),wereadjustmentsmadetoapproximatemarketvalues?

- Wasthevaluationofeffectsappropriateforthequestionposed?Wastheappropriatetypeofanalysis/analyses(e.g.cost-effectiveness,cost-benefitorcost-utilityanalysis)undertaken?

Market valueisthepriceanassetwouldfetchinthemarketplace

7. Werecostsandeffectsadjustedfordifferentialtiming?

- Werefuturecostsandeffectsdiscountedtotheirpresentvalue?

- Whatwasthediscountrateusedandwasthejustificationforthisratespecified?

8. Wasanincrementalanalysisofcostsandeffectsofalternativesperformed?

- Weretheadditional(incremental)costsgeneratedbyonealternativeoveranothercomparedtotheadditionaleffects,benefits,orutilitiesgenerated?

Page 21: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

20

9. Wereallowancesmadeforuncertaintyintheestimatesofcostsandeffects?

- Wereappropriateanalysesundertakenonpatient-leveldataofcostsandeffects?

- Ifsensitivityanalyseswereundertaken,werethejustificationfortherangesanddistributionofvalueschosen(forkeyparameters)specifiedandexplained?

- Wereconclusionsdrawnsensitivetouncertaintyfromthestatisticaland/orsensitivityanalyses?

10 Didthepresentationanddiscussionofstudyresultsincludeallissuesofconcerntousers?

- Wereconclusionsoftheanalysisbasedonanindexorratio(e.g.cost-effectivenessorcost-benefitratio)?Wasthisratiointerpretedintelligentlyorinamechanisticfashion?

- Weretheresultscomparedwiththoseofotherswhohaveinvestigatedthesamequestion?Ifso,wereallowancesmadeforpotentialdifferencesinmethodology?

- Didthestudydiscussthepotentialofgeneralisabilityoftheresultstoothersettingsorpatient/populationgroups?

- Didthestudytakeinaccountotherimportantfactorsinthechoiceordecisionunderconsideration(e.g.ethicalissues,limitedstaffnumbersorwiderpolicycontextandrelevance)?

- Didthestudydiscussissuesofimplementation(e.g.feasibilityofadoptingrecommendations)?Arethereanypotentialissuesregardingfinanceandresources?Couldresourcesberelocatedfromotherareastoassisttheimplementation?

Page 22: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

21

7.2 Philipsetal.,(2004)checklistforcriticallyappraisingdecisionanalyticmodels

Decision analytic modellingiswidelyusedinthefieldofhealtheconomicsasameansofestimatingthecosts,outcomesandcost-effectivenessofdifferentinterventionsandprogrammesinhealthcareandpublichealth.Alogicalmodelispresentedwithmathematicalrepresentationoftherelationshipsbetweeninputsandresults.Thesemethodsareoftenusedtopredicthealthoutcomesandcostswhentheinterventioncannotbeevaluateddirectlyorthescopeoftheevaluationfallsoutsideoftheexistingevidencebase.Thechecklistquestionsarepresentedbelow.

ThePhilipsetal.,(2004)checklistforcriticallyappraisingdecisionanalyticmodels(adaptedfromPhilipsetal.,2004)

PermissiontoreproducethePhilipschecklisthasbeengrantedbytheauthorsandthepublishersofthechecklisttheNationalInstituteforHealthResearch(NIHR)

Dimension of quality

Questions to ask

Statementofdecisionproblem/objective

- Isthereaclearstatementofthedecisionproblem?

- Istheobjectiveoftheevaluationandmodelspecifiedandconsistentwiththestateddecisionproblem?

- Istheprimarydecision-makerspecified?

Statementofscope/perspective

- Istheperspectiveofthemodelstatedclearly?

- Arethemodelinputsconsistentwiththestatedperspective?

- Hasthescopeofthemodelbeenstatedandjustified?

- Aretheoutcomesofthemodelconsistentwiththeperspective,scopeandoverallobjectiveofthemodel?

Page 23: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

22

Dimension of quality

Questions to ask

Rationaleforstructure

- Isthestructureofthemodelconsistentwithacoherenttheoryofthehealthconditionunderevaluation?

- Arethesourcesofdatausedtodevelopthestructureofthemodelspecified?

- Arethecausalrelationshipsdescribedbythemodelstructurejustifiedappropriately?

Structuralassumptions

- Arethestructuralassumptionstransparentandjustified?

- Arethestructuralassumptionsreasonablegiventheoverallobjective,perspectiveandscopeofthemodel?

Strategies/comparators

- Isthereacleardefinitionoftheoptionsunderevaluation?

- Haveallfeasibleandpracticaloptionsbeenevaluated?

- Istherejustificationfortheexclusionoffeasibleoptions?

Modeltype - Isthechosenmodeltypeappropriategiventhedecisionproblemandspecifiedcausalrelationshipswithinthemodel?

Timehorizon - Isthetimehorizonofthemodelsufficienttoreflectallimportantdifferencesbetweenoptions?

- Arethetimehorizonofthemodel,thedurationoftreatmentandthedurationoftreatmenteffectdescribedandjustified?

Page 24: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

23

Dimension of quality

Questions to ask

Diseasestates/pathways

- Dothediseasestates(statetransitionmodel)orthepathways(decisiontreemodel)reflecttheunderlyingbiologicalprocessofthediseaseinquestionandtheimpactofinterventions?

Cyclelength - Isthecyclelengthdefinedandjustifiedintermsofthenaturalhistoryofdisease?

Data identification

- Arethedataidentificationmethodstransparentandappropriategiventheobjectivesofthemodel?

- Wherechoiceshavebeenmadebetweendatasources,arethesejustifiedappropriately?

- Hasparticularattentionbeenpaidtoidentifyingdatafortheimportantparametersinthemodel?

- Hasthequalityofthedatabeenassessedappropriately?

- Whereexpertopinionhasbeenused,arethemethodsdescribedandjustified?

Datamodelling - Isthedatamodellingmethodologybasedonjustifiablestatisticalandepidemiologicaltechniques?

Baselinedata - Isthechoiceofbaselinedatadescribedandjustified?

- Aretransitionprobabilitiescalculatedappropriately?

- Hasahalf-cyclecorrectionbeenappliedtobothcostandoutcome?

- Ifnot,hasthisomissionbeenjustified?

Page 25: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

24

Dimension of quality

Questions to ask

Treatmenteffects

- Ifrelativetreatmenteffectshavebeenderivedfromtrialdata,havetheybeensynthesisedusingappropriatetechniques?

- Havethemethodsandassumptionsusedtoextrapolateshort-termresultstofinaloutcomesbeendocumentedandjustified?Havealternativeassumptionsbeenexploredthroughsensitivityanalysis?

- Haveassumptionsregardingthecontinuingeffectoftreatmentoncetreatmentiscompletebeendocumentedandjustified?Havealternativeassumptionsbeenexploredthroughsensitivityanalysis?

Costs - Arethecostsincorporatedintothemodeljustified?

- Hasthesourceforallcostsbeendescribed?

- Havediscountratesbeendescribedandjustifiedgiventhetargetdecision-maker?

Qualityoflifeweights(utilities)

- Aretheutilitiesincorporatedintothemodelappropriate?

- Isthesourcefortheutilityweightsreferenced?

- Arethemethodsforderivationfortheutilityweightsjustified?

Page 26: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

25

Dimension of quality

Questions to ask

Data incorporation

- Havealldataincorporatedintothemodelbeendescribedandreferencedinsufficientdetail?

- Hastheuseofmutuallyinconsistentdatabeenjustified(areassumptionsandchoicesappropriate)?

- Istheprocessofdataincorporationtransparent?

- Ifdatahavebeenincorporatedasdistributions,hasthechoiceofdistributionforeachparameterbeendescribedandjustified?

- Ifdatahavebeenincorporatedasdistributions,isitclearthatsecondorderuncertaintyisreflected?

Assessmentofuncertainty

- Havethefourprincipaltypesofuncertaintybeenaddressed?

- Ifnot,hastheomissionofparticularformsofuncertaintybeenjustified?

Methodological - Havemethodologicaluncertaintiesbeenaddressedbyrunningalternativeversionsofthemodelwithdifferentmethodologicalassumptions?

Structural - Isthereevidencethatstructuraluncertaintieshavebeenaddressedviasensitivityanalysis?

Heterogeneity - Hasheterogeneitybeendealtwithbyrunningthemodelseparatelyfordifferentsubgroups?

Parameter - Arethemethodsofassessmentofparameteruncertaintyappropriate?

- Ifdataareincorporatedaspointestimates,aretherangesusedforsensitivityanalysisstatedclearandjustified?

Page 27: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

26

Dimension of quality

Questions to ask

InternalConsistency

- Isthereevidencethatthemathematicallogicofthemodelhasbeentestedthoroughlybeforeuse?

ExternalConsistency

- Areanycounterintuitiveresultsfromthemodelexplainedandjustified?

- Ifthemodelhasbeencalibratedagainstindependentdata,haveanydifferencesbeenexplainedandjustified?

- Havetheresultsofthemodelbeencomparedwiththoseofpreviousmodelsandanydifferencesinresultsexplained?

7.3 StandardsofReportingforEconomicEvaluations

TheConsolidatedHealthEconomicEvaluationReportingStandards(CHEERS)statementwasdevelopedtoprovideconsistencyinthereportingofeconomicevaluations.ThechecklistissimilartotheConsolidatedStandardsofReportingTrials(CONSORT)formatandprovidesconsistencywithotherapproaches.TheCONSORTstatementandchecklistsareanevidence-based,minimumsetofrecommendationsforreportingrandomisedtrials.Theyweredevelopedtocreatestandardisationinreporting,tofacilitatetransparencyandaidcriticalappraisalandinterpretation.The24itemCHEERSchecklistdescribesthekeyrecommendationsoftheinformationthatshouldbeincludedunderheadingsforexample:title,abstract,background/objectives,targetpopulation,studyperspective,comparators,timehorizon,studyparameters,incrementalcostandoutcomes,limitationsandgeneralisability.Forthefullchecklist,seeHusereauetal.,(2013).

Page 28: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

27

8. Useful Health Economics Resources Health Knowledge

Anonlineresourceforanyoneworkinginhealth,socialcareandwell-being.Thewebsiteoffersabroadrangeoflearningmaterials,dividedintofourdifferentlearningstyles:

•APublicHealthTextbookorganisedinrelationtotheFacultyofPublic HealthPartAsyllabus.

•Textcourseswithtext,questions,answersandfeedbackonarangeof topics.

•PodcastsandVideoPowerPointswithsupportingresources.

•ManagementtrainingwithPowerPointslides,workbooksandtrainer notesinfourclinicalareas:diabetes,coronaryheartdisease,strokeand childhealth.

Thisonlineresourcehasaspecificsectiononhealtheconomics. www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/medical-sociology-policy-economics/4d-health-economics

Service Utilisation and CostsDatabase of Instruments for Resource Use Measurement (DIRUM)

DIRUMisanopen-accessdatabaseofresource-usequestionnairesforusebyhealtheconomistsinvolvedintrial-basedeconomicevaluations.FundedbytheMedicalResearchCouncilNetworkofHubsforTrialMethodologyResearch,DIRUMoffersaunique(andpermanent)webaddressforeachresourceusemeasureforcitationinpapersandreports.DIRUMalsoprovidesarepositoryofmethodologicalpapersrelatedtoresourceuseandcostmeasurement.

http://www.dirum.org/

Unit Costs of Health and Social Care

AdownloadablePDFcontainingunitcostsofhealthandsocialcarecontactsandcaredevelopedbythePersonalSocialServicesResearchUnitattheUniversityofKentatCanterburyandtheLondonSchoolofEconomicsandPoliticalScience.Thisdocumentisusedineconomicevaluations,quantifyingandapplyingacosttoGPappointmentsandcommunitycare.

http://www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/unit-costs/

Page 29: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

28

NHS reference costs

AdownloadableExcelfilecontainingaverageunitcoststotheNHSofprovidingsecondaryhealthcaretoNHSpatients.Itisusedineconomicevaluationstoapplyacosttotreatmentreceivedbyparticipantstocalculatethecostofsecondarycare.

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/nhs-reference-costs

Systematic Reviewing

Shemiltandcolleagues(2013)reflectonthevalueanddesirefortheconsiderationbyendusersforcoverageofaneconomicperspectiveinaCochranereviewandoutlinestwopotentialapproachesandfuturedirections.Thispaperprovidesagoodintroductiontoeconomicperspectivesandconsiderationswhenconductingsystematicreviews.

http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/2/1/83

Useful Databases containing economic evidence

TheHealthTechnologyAssessmentDatabase http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/

NHSEconomicEvaluationDatabase http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/

RePEc(ResearchPapersinEconomics) http://www.repec.org/

EconLit https://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/

Page 30: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

29

References BergerML,BingeforsK,HedblomEC,PashosCL,TorranceGW.(2003).HealthCareCost,Quality,andOutcomes:ISPORBookofTerms.Lawrenceville,NJ:ISPOR.

BMJ(2012)ClinicalEvidenceToolbox http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/x/set/static/ebm/toolbox/678253.html

BrazierJ,RatcliffeJ,SalomanJA,TsuchiyaA.(2007).MeasuringandValuingHealthBenefitsforEconomicEvaluation.OxfordUniversityPress:Oxford,UK

BrazierJE,HarperR,JonesNM,O’CathainA,ThomasKJ,UsherwoodT,WestlakeL.(1992)ValidatingtheSF-36healthsurveyquestionnaire:newoutcomemeasureforprimarycare.BMJ.305(6846):160–164.

TheCabinetOffice’sGuide(2011).AGuidetoSocialReturnonInvestment. http://www.bond.org.uk/data/files/Cabinet_office_A_guide_to_Social_Return_on_Investment.pdf

DrummondMF,SculpherMJ,ClaxtonK,StoddartGLandTorranceGW.(2015).Methodsfortheeconomicevaluationofhealthcareprogrammes(4thEd.).OxfordUniversityPress:Oxford,UK

DrummondMF,McGuireA.(2007).EconomicEvaluationinHealthCare,MergingTheorywithPractice.OxfordUniversityPress:Oxford,UK

EichlerHG,KongSX,GerthWC,MavrosP,JonssonB.(2004).UseofCost-EffectivenessAnalysisinHealth-CareResourceAllocationDecision-Making:HowAreCost-EffectivenessThresholdsExpectedtoEmerge?ValueinHealth,7,518-528.

TheEuroQolGroup(1990).EuroQol-anewfacilityforthemeasurementofhealth-relatedqualityoflife.HealthPolicy16(3):199-208.

FenwickE,ByfordS.(2005).Aguidetocost-effectivenessacceptabilitycurves.BritishJournalofPsychiatry187:106-108.

GlickHA,DoshiJA,SonnadSS,PolskyD.(2007).EconomicEvaluationinClinicalTrials.OxfordUniversityPress:Oxford,UK

GrossmanM.(1972).Ontheconceptofhealthcapitalandthedemandforhealth.TheJournalofPoliticalEconomy80(2):223-255.

HorsmanJ,FurlongW,FeenyD,TorranceG.(2003)TheHealthUtilitiesIndex(HUI®):Concepts,MeasurementPropertiesandApplications.HealthandQualityofLifeOutcomes(electronicjournal),1,54.

Page 31: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

30

McIntoshE,ClarkeP,FrewE,LouviereJ.(2010).AppliedMethodsofCost-BenefitAnalysisinHealthCare.OxfordUniversityPress

MorrisS,DevlinN,ParkinD.(2007).EconomicAnalysisInHealthCare.WileyandSons,Chichester,UK

NationalInstituteforHealthandCareExcellence(NICE)(2008).Measuringeffectivenessandcosteffectiveness:theQALY. http://publications.nice.org.uk/how-nice-measures-value-for-money-in-relation-to-public-health-interventions-lgb10b/nices-approach-to-economic-analysis-for-public-health-interventions

NationalInstituteforHealthandCareExcellence(NICE)(2012).MethodsforthedevelopmentofNICEpublichealthguidance(3rdedition). http://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg4/resources/non-guidance-methods-for-the-development-of-nice-public-health-guidance-third-edition-pdf

OfficeofHealthEconomics(OHE)(2008)Glossary.

OwenL,MorganA,FischerA,EllisS,HoyA,KellyMP.(2012).Thecost-effectivenessofpublichealthinterventions.JournalofPublicHealth,34(1),37-45.

PhillipsZ,GinnellyL,SculpherM,ClaxtonK,GolderS,RiemsmaR,WoolacootN,GlanvilleJ.(2004).Reviewofguidelinesforgoodpracticeindecision-analyticmodellinginhealthtechnologyassessment.HealthTechnologyAssessment8(36),1-158.

Robinson,R.(1993a).EconomicEvaluationinHealthCare.Costsandcost-minimisationanalysis.BMJ,307,726-728.

Robinson,R.(1993b).EconomicEvaluationinHealthCare.Cost-effectivenessanalysis.BMJ,307,793-795.

Robinson,R.(1993c).EconomicEvaluationinHealthCare.Cost-utilityanalysis.BMJ,307,859-862.

Robinson,R.(1993d).EconomicEvaluationinHealthCare.Cost-benefitanalysis.BMJ, 307,924-926.

AcknowledgementsTheauthorswishtothankDrChristopherJohnson,PublicHealthWales;LizGreen,WalesHealthImpactAssessmentSupportUnit;andDrSamGroves,SwanseaCentreforHealthEconomics,SwanseaUniversitywhoprovidedfeedbackondraftsofthehandbook.

Page 32: A Guide To Health Economics For Those Working in Public Health · public sector or societal). Positive externalities – a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of

This Handbook is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License and

may be downloaded and shared as long as the authors are credited, but adapting the handbook’s content or using it for commercial purposes is not permitted.

Centre for Health Economics and Medicines EvaluationArdudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ

Phone: 01248 382153

ISBN Number 978-1-84220-144-2October 2016

Joanna Charles is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation at Bangor University. She has an interest in the use of health economic techniques for evaluating public health interventions, evidence synthesis and micro-costing methodologies.

Rhiannon Tudor Edwards is Professor of Health Economics and Co-Director of the Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation at Bangor University. She is an Honorary Member of the Faculty of Public Health, a Fellow of the Learned Society of Wales and a Health and Care Research Wales Senior Investigator. Her interests centre on the economics of prevention and the application of health economics to the evaluation of public health interventions.

Funded by Public Health WalesPublic Health Wales is an NHS organisation providing professionally independent public health advice and services to protect and improve the health and wellbeing of the population of Wales. Production of this report was funded by Public Health Wales. However, the views in this report are entirely those of the authors and

should not be assumed to be the same as those of Public Health Wales.