REPORTS

Cite as: T. Qin et al., Science 10.1126/science.aaf6123 (2016).

The heart of chemical synthesis relies on forging new C–C bonds with the evolution and advancement of the field be-ing easily correlated to new developments on this front. For example, pioneering work on the cross-coupling of halogen-ated aromatic or vinylic (sp2) systems (Heck, Suzuki, Negishi, Stille) has transformed the practice of organic syn-thesis (1). Similarly, a general and practical approach to C(sp3)–C(sp3) variants, would have the potential to open up new vistas in retrosynthetic analysis. Indeed, such trans-formations have been on organic chemists' wish list for well over a century (2, 3). Historically, alkyl-alkyl transition met-al-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions have been difficult to accomplish, but examples can be traced to the early work of Kharasch in the 1950s (4), followed by Noller (5, 6), Kochi and Tamura (7, 8) in the 1960s to more recent work from the groups of Suzuki (9), Fu (10), Knochel (11), Kambe (12), Oshima (13), and many others (14). Thus far, the vast major-ity of approaches to this problem have involved the coupling of alkyl halides (or related species) to organometallic rea-gents (15–18). However, the limited availability, perceived instability, and frequent toxicity of alkyl halides has perhaps prevented the area of alkyl cross-coupling from blossoming. If one only considers convenience, stability, and availability as desired attributes in a functional group for such a cou-pling, the carboxylic acid reigns supreme (Fig. 1A). Alkyl carboxylic acids are ubiquitous in every aspect of chemistry and can be readily found in medicines, materials, natural products, and in the pages of commercial chemical supplier catalogs. They are a stable functional group, non-toxic, and eminently diversifiable owing to the field of combinatorial chemistry where they are the “workhorse” building block. Although certain carboxylic acids have already been demon-

strated to engage in cross-coupling reactions (19), the use of alkyl carboxylic acids in alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling remains elusive.

Carboxylic acids can be primed for reaction by a process known as activation (such as formation of an active ester, –OA*), dating back to the classic work of Sheehan in the syn-thesis of penicillin (20). Once activated, a gateway opens to access a myriad of related functional groups such as amides, ketones, esters or alcohols via addition of a nucleophile or alternative oxidation states by the formal addition of hydro-gen. In this Report, a broadly useful transform, able to forge C(sp3)–C(sp3) bonds via this age-old activation process, is presented.

We recently reported a Ni-catalyzed decarboxylative cross-coupling of alkyl carboxylic acids with arylzinc rea-gents to forge C(sp3)–C(sp2) bonds by repurposing activating methods more typically associated with amide-bond for-mation (21, 22). Certain active esters (e.g., HOAt (aza –N-hydroxybenzotriazole), HOBt (N-hydroxybenzotriazole), NHPI (N-hydroxyphathalimide) TCNHPI (tetrachloro N-hydroxyphthalimide)) can accept an electron to trigger an ensuing cascade of events that liberates CO2 from the parent alkyl group (Alk1); such esters (23) are termed redox-active (21, 22). The application of this chemistry to sp3–sp3 C–C bond formation poses a number of substantial challenges, with potentially unproductive pathways far outnumbering the desired reaction (Fig. 1B) (15–18). For example, ß-hydride elimination from the alkyl metal intermediates, di-merization of the organometallic reagent, reduction of the electrophile, and proto-demetallation are problems which also historically plague traditional C(sp3)–C(sp3) cross-coupling reactions. With a redox-active ester as an electro-

A general alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling enabled by redox-active esters and alkylzinc reagents Tian Qin,1* Josep Cornella,1* Chao Li,1* Lara R. Malins,1 Jacob T. Edwards,1 Shuhei Kawamura,1 Brad D. Maxwell,2 Martin D. Eastgate,3 Phil S. Baran1† 1Department of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. 2Discovery Chemistry Platforms–Radiochemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Post Office Box 4000, Princeton, NJ, USA. 3Chemical Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, One Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

†Corresponding author. Email: pbaran@scripps.edu

Alkyl carboxylic acids are ubiquitous in all facets of chemical science, from natural products to polymers and represent an ideal starting material with which to forge new connections. This study demonstrates how the same activating principles used for decades to make simple C–N (amide) bonds from carboxylic acids with loss of water can be employed to make C–C bonds through coupling with dialkylzinc reagents and loss of carbon dioxide. This disconnection strategy benefits from the use of a simple, inexpensive nickel catalyst and exhibits a remarkably broad scope across a range of substrates (>70 examples).

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 1

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

phile, oxidative addition of low valent Ni into the activated C–O bond could result in formation of an acyl-Ni complex, which could reductively eliminate and ultimately result in undesired ketone byproducts. These fundamental challenges notwithstanding, described below is a straightforward solu-tion to this problem.

Dialkylzinc reagents were chosen for the organometallic coupling partner due to their ease of preparation from the parent alkyl halide, high functional group tolerance, and their propensity for facile transmetallation. Over the years, mono and dialkylzinc reagents have been shown to be viable cross-coupling partners in Negishi cross-coupling using al-kyl halides and related species using Ni-based catalysts (16, 18). Thus, an exploration of the coupling of redox-active es-ters 1a and 1b (Fig. 1C) with diethylzinc (2) was undertaken. An exhaustive screen of ligands, including bipy (L1, entry 1 – 2) and di-tBubipy (L2, entries 3 and 4) showed that the electron-deficient TCNHPI ester 1b with L2 afforded the desired product in 84% isolated yield (entry 4). TCNHPI can be easily prepared from tetrachlorophthalic anhydride, an industrial non-toxic flame retardant (ca. $48/kg from VWR) (24) and it has recently been commercialized by Aldrich (catalog # ALD00564). Additional screening of ligands based on phenanthroline (L3 – L5, entries 5 – 7) and terpyridine (L6 and L7, entries 8 and 9) did not improve the yield and were in many cases detrimental. When the reaction was per-formed in the absence of NiCl2·glyme, the desired product was not formed (entry 10).

With an optimized set of conditions in hand, the scope of this new reaction was explored and found to be remarkably broad. First, a range of dialkylzinc reagents (sixteen, Fig. 2A) was explored with piperidine esters 1a and 1b. With the ex-ception of dibenzylzinc reagents, all primary dialkylzinc re-agents explored were viable in the cross coupling. From dimethylzinc (4) and simple alkyl chains (3, 5, 6, 9, 10) to derivatives harboring olefins (7-8), alkynes (11-12), acetals (16), ethers (14-15), and even alkyl halides (13) were toler-ated. The reaction was easily run on a gram scale (as exem-plified by 3) and could even be employed to produce isotopically labeled piperidine 4-13C. In addition to 3, this example highlights that a lower loading of dialkylzinc rea-gent (0.5 equiv) could be employed when a highly valuable alkyl group is involved. Secondary alkylzinc reagents such as cyclopropylzinc could also be accommodated as exemplified by 17.

Next, the scope of secondary alkyl carboxylic acids (fif-teen, Fig. 2B) was explored. Cyclic (18, 19, 21), heterocyclic (20, 22, 26-28, 31), bridging (25), indane (24), acyclic (29), and even fluorinated (23, 30) alkyl carboxylic acids were all viable coupling partners. Substrates 30 through 32 are particularly striking and open the door to access a vast array of fluorinated building blocks and optically pure tar-

trate-derived materials. Many of these products would be either inconvenient or chemically intractable to access from the corresponding alkyl halide starting materials (27, 28, 30, 31 and 32).

Primary alkyl carboxylic acids, representing some of the most inexpensive organic materials available, could also be readily employed. Of the eight examples depicted in Fig. 2C, most notable are the use of mono-methyladipic acid (34, 2.5 billion kg of adipic acid are produced per year) (25), a pyri-dine-containing substrate (36), and a polyfluorinated acid (40). Tertiary alkyl carboxylic acids (Fig. 2D) could also be employed to generate quaternary centers. Although limited in scope, bridgehead systems such as adamantane (41 and 42) or bicyclo[2.2.2]octane (43) smoothly participated in the cross-coupling. The preparation of such bridged-systems is traditionally performed via a 3-step Wittig/hydrogenation sequence from the parent aldehyde (26). Although pivalic acid (44) did not couple in this context, its failure led to a distinct type of coupling (vide infra).

Simple primary and secondary α-oxyacids could also be employed (Fig. 2E, 45-49), representing a practical route to form ethers that would not be possible using alkyl halides. The classic Williamson ether synthesis is still the staple transform for constructing ethers but in many cases the SN2 reaction is either sluggish or unworkable due to steric hin-drance. This cross coupling opens a distinct disconnection strategy for ether synthesis by using easily obtained α-oxyacids (either commercial or derived via alkylation with bromoacetic acid) as progenitors for a virtually limitless array of new ethers.

Redox-active esters enable the cross-coupling of alkylzinc reagents with high chemoselectivity (Fig. 2F) even in com-plex contexts, reminiscent of that exhibited in classic amide-bond formation. For example, a variety of sensitive fatty acids reacted smoothly to give the corresponding alkyl chains (50, 57 and 58) without olefin isomerization or epoxide opening. Naturally occurring carboxylic acids such as biotin, cholic acid and dehydrocholic acid were also ame-nable to alkylation (54-56). Pharmaceuticals such as pregabalin, 2,4-D, cetirizine and atorvastatin smoothly re-acted with alkylzinc reagents to afford good yields of the alkyl coupling products (51-53 and 59).

In perhaps the most impressive feat of chemoselectivity for this methodology, the cross-coupling could be conducted on solid phase in the context of peptide synthesis. On-resin coupling of dialkylzinc reagents to proteinogenic amino ac-ids (both side-chain and α-carboxylic acids) facilitates the late-stage introduction of designer amino acids, which would otherwise require de novo synthesis. Valuable syn-thetic handles including alkenes (60 and 62) and alkyl ethers (63) could be readily incorporated into resin-bound substrates (Fig. 3), and the installation of an aliphatic side-

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 2

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

chain (61) provides a facile approach to the modulation of peptide lipophilicity (27). Double activation of a peptide substrate bearing both Asp and Glu residues also enables the simultaneous introduction of multiple non-proteinogenic side-chains (64 and 65). This convenient ap-proach to diversely functionalized peptides provides a tool for the construction of therapeutic peptide leads, stapled peptides (28, 29) and for applications in bioconjugation (30).

Returning to the limitations posed by tertiary systems, mechanistic studies involving 5-exo-dig cyclization, racemi-zation and ring-strain opening experiments clearly point to the radical nature of this reaction (figs. S1 to S3). We rea-soned that the steric limitations encountered could be over-come by engaging these reactive species with a radical trap that could subsequently combine with an organozinc rea-gent. Remarkably, such a conjunctive cross-coupling could be realized as shown in Fig. 4 (31). By using benzylacrylate as a radical trap and phenylzinc as a coupling partner, thir-teen different tertiary alkyl carboxylic acids could be smoothly engaged in a three-component cross coupling to generate useful building blocks that would be extremely difficult to access in any other way (66-78). This reaction is scalable (as exemplified by 76), generates 2 new C–C bonds, and is a rare example of a multicomponent cross coupling reaction that forms quaternary centers in high yield. In ad-dition to the broad functional group tolerance (heteroatom containing substrates, Boc (tert-butoxycarbonyl), TBS (tert-butyldimethylsilyl), MOM (methoxymethyl) groups), this reaction features the use of electronically different radical precursors, such as α-heteroatom acids or electronically un-biased and neutral alkyl acids such as pivalic acid.

As with any methodology there are obvious drawbacks. For example, the atom-economy is low due to the use of an activating group. We do note, however, that such considera-tions are ignored in the enormous field of peptide chemistry where expensive coupling agents are regularly employed to make a simple amide bond (32). The activating agents uti-lized herein, NHPI ($19.5/mol) and TCNHPI (vide supra), are both commercially available and derived from cheap, readily available materials and open a gateway of reactivity heretofore inaccessible. The use of two equivalents of the dialkylzinc reagent is another disadvantage in cases where the zinc-derived fragment is valuable. However, as shown in 3 and 4-13C, the reaction proceeds with workable yields when simply equimolar amounts of alkylzinc reagents and 5 mol% catalyst were employed.

The data presented herein suggests that the advantages associated with this method far outweigh its limitations. Without exception, the carboxylic acids employed represent the most inexpensive sources of these carbon frameworks; in fact all of these were commercially available. In contrast,

in the cases where an alkyl halide would be chemically sta-ble, only a handful are commercially available. Conceptually, carboxylic acids can perhaps be considered as Nature's ver-sion of a boronic acid. For the past seven decades these ubiquitous functional groups have usually been dehydrated with incorporation of a nucleophile (such as an amine to make an amide). This method extends the native diversifica-tion of this functional group (33), to allow for the addition of a new carbon framework via extrusion of CO2. As such it is anticipated that this technique will greatly expand plan-ning options in retrosynthetic analysis.

REFERENCES AND NOTES 1. F. Diederich, P. J. Stang, Metal-catalyzed Cross-coupling Reactions (Wiley-VCH:

New York, 1998). 2. P. Jolibois, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sciences 155, 213 (1912). 3. E. Späth, Über die Einwirkung von Halogenalkylen auf Alkylmagnesiumhaloide.

Monatsh. Chem. 34, 1965–2014 (1913). doi:10.1007/BF01518988 4. M. S. Kharasch, J. K. Hambling, T. P. Rudy, Reactions of Atoms and Free Radicals

in Solution. XL. Reaction of Grignard Reagents with 1-Bromooctane in the Presence of Cobaltous Bromide. J. Org. Chem. 24, 303–305 (1959). doi:10.1021/jo01085a003

5. V. D. Parker, L. H. Piette, R. M. Salinger, C. R. Noller, The catalyzed reaction of alkyllmagnesium halides with alkyl halides. II. The nature of the catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 1110–1112 (1964). doi:10.1021/ja01060a030

6. V. D. Parker, C. R. Noller, The catalyzed reaction of alkylmagnesium halides wth alkyl halides. III. Course of the reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 1112–1116 (1964). doi:10.1021/ja01060a031

7. M. Tamura, J. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 1483 (1970). 8. M. Tamura, J. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 1485 (1970). 9. T. Ishiyama, S. Abe, N. Miyaura, A. Suzuki, Palladium-Catalyzed Alkyl-Alkyl Cross-

Coupling Reaction of 9-Alkyl-9-BBN Derivatives with Iodoalkanes Possessing. BETA.-Hydrogens. Chem. Lett. 21, 691–694 (1992). doi:10.1246/cl.1992.691

10. M. R. Netherton, C. Dai, K. Neuschütz, G. C. Fu, Room-temperature alkyl-alkyl Suzuki cross-coupling of alkyl bromides that possess beta hydrogens. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 10099–10100 (2001). Medline doi:10.1021/ja011306o

11. A. Devasagayaraj, T. Stüdemann, P. Knochel, A New Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reaction between sp3 Carbon Centers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 2723–2725 (1995). doi:10.1002/anie.199527231

12. J. Terao, H. Watanabe, A. Ikumi, H. Kuniyasu, N. Kambe, Nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction of grignard reagents with alkyl halides and tosylates: Remarkable effect of 1,3-butadienes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 4222–4223 (2002). Medline doi:10.1021/ja025828v

13. T. Tsuji, H. Yorimitsu, K. Oshima, Cobalt-Catalyzed Coupling Reaction of Alkyl Halides with Allylic Grignard Reagents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 4137–4139 (2002). doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20021104)41:21<4137::AID-ANIE4137>3.0.CO;2-0

14. K. B. Urkalan, M. S. Sigman, Palladium-catalyzed hydroalkylation of styrenes with organozinc reagents to form carbon-carbon sp3-sp3 bonds under oxidative conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 18042–18043 (2009). Medline doi:10.1021/ja908545b

15. M. R. Netherton, G. C. Fu, Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings of Unactivated Alkyl Halides and Pseudohalides with Organometallic Compounds. Adv. Synth. Catal. 346, 1525–1532 (2004). doi:10.1002/adsc.200404223

16. A. C. Frisch, M. Beller, Catalysts for Cross-Coupling Reactions with Non-activated Alkyl Halides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 674–688 (2005). doi:10.1002/anie.200461432

17. A. Rudolph, M. Lautens, Secondary Alkyl Halides in Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 2656–2670 (2009). doi:10.1002/anie.200803611

18. R. Jana, T. P. Pathak, M. S. Sigman, Advances in transition metal (Pd, Ni, Fe)-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions using alkyl-organometallics as reaction partners. Chem. Rev. 111, 1417–1492 (2011). Medline doi:10.1021/cr100327p

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 3

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

19. N. Rodríguez, L. J. Goossen, Decarboxylative coupling reactions: A modern strategy for C-C-bond formation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 5030–5048 (2011). Medline doi:10.1039/c1cs15093f

20. J. C. Sheehan, The Enchanted Ring. The Untold Story of Penicillin (Cambridge, MIT Press, 1982)

21. J. Cornella, J. T. Edwards, T. Qin, S. Kawamura, J. Wang, C. M. Pan, R. Gianatassio, M. Schmidt, M. D. Eastgate, P. S. Baran, Practical Ni-Catalyzed Aryl-Alkyl Cross-Coupling of Secondary Redox-Active Esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 2174–2177 (2016). Medline doi:10.1021/jacs.6b00250

22. K. M. M. Huihui et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2016). 10.1021/jacs.6b01533 23. K. Okada, K. Okamoto, M. Oda, A new and practical method of decarboxylation:

Photosensitized decarboxylation of N-acyloxyphthalimides via electron-transfer mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 8736–8738 (1988). doi:10.1021/ja00234a047

24. Data retrieved from https://us.vwr.com/store on the 6th of April of 2016. 25. M. T. Musser, Adipic Acid. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley-

VCH, Weinheim, 2000). 26. S. T. Waddell et al., PCT International Application US 20040133011 (2004). 27. J. A. Arnott, S. L. Planey, The influence of lipophilicity in drug discovery and

design. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 7, 863–875 (2012). Medline doi:10.1517/17460441.2012.714363

28. J. A. Kritzer, Stapled peptides: Magic bullets in nature’s arsenal. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 566–567 (2010). Medline doi:10.1038/nchembio.407

29. Y. H. Lau, P. de Andrade, Y. Wu, D. R. Spring, Peptide stapling techniques based on different macrocyclisation chemistries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 91–102 (2015). Medline doi:10.1039/C4CS00246F

30. O. Boutureira, G. J. L. Bernardes, Advances in chemical protein modification. Chem. Rev. 115, 2174–2195 (2015). Medline doi:10.1021/cr500399p

31. L. Zhang, G. J. Lovinger, E. K. Edelstein, A. A. Szymaniak, M. P. Chierchia, J. P. Morken, Catalytic conjunctive cross-coupling enabled by metal-induced metallate rearrangement. Science 351, 70–74 (2016). Medline doi:10.1126/science.aad6080

32. Y. Ishihara, A. Montero, P. S. Baran, The Portable Chemist’s Consultant (Apple Publishing Group, Cupertino, CA, 2013).

33. M. A. Ogliaruso, J. F. Wolfe, Synthesis of Carboxylic Acids, Esters and their Derivatives (John Wiley, Chichester, England, 1991).

34. T. Nakamura, H. Yorimitsu, H. Shinokubo, K. Oshima, Reduction of Organic Halides with Tri-2-Furanylgermane: Stoichiometric and Catalytic Reaction. Synlett 1999, 1415–1416 (1999) Ksdjc. doi:10.1055/s-1999-2874

35. V. W. Bowry, K. U. Ingold, Kinetics of nitroxide radical trapping. 2. Structural effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 4992–4996 (1992) Sdcnksjdnc. doi:10.1021/ja00039a006

36. A. L. J. Beckwith, K. U. Ingold, Free Radical Rearrangements. In Rearrangements in Ground and Excited States; de Mayo, P., Ed.; Academic Press: NY, 1980; Vol. 1, pp 161-310.

37. K. Sugamoto, Y. Matsushita, Y. Kameda, M. Suzuki, T. Matsui, Microwave‐assisted Synthesis of N ‐Hydroxyphthalimide Derivatives. Synth. Commun. 35, 67–70 (2005). doi:10.1081/SCC-200046498

38. D. Seebach, L. Behrendt, D. Felix, Titanate-Catalyzed Enantioselective Addition of Dialkylzinc Compounds—Generated in situ from Grignard Reagents in Ether—to Aldehydes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 30, 1008–1009 (1991). doi:10.1002/anie.199110081

39. F. M. Piller, P. Appukkuttan, A. Gavryushin, M. Helm, P. Knochel, Convenient Preparation of Polyfunctional Aryl Magnesium Reagents by a Direct Magnesium Insertion in the Presence of LiCl. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 6802–6806 (2008). doi:10.1002/anie.200801968

40. F. M. Piller, A. Metzger, M. A. Schade, B. A. Haag, A. Gavryushin, P. Knochel, Preparation of polyfunctional arylmagnesium, arylzinc, and benzylic zinc reagents by using magnesium in the presence of LiCl. Chemistry 15, 7192–7202 (2009). Medline doi:10.1002/chem.200900575

41. F. Hettche, R. W. Hoffmann, A tri-armed sulfonamide host for selective binding of chloride. New J. Chem. 27, 172–177 (2003). doi:10.1039/b206125m

42. E. Nyfeler, P. Renaud, Decarboxylative radical azidation using MPDOC and MMDOC esters. Org. Lett. 10, 985–988 (2008). Medline doi:10.1021/ol702832x

43. A. R. Yeager, N. S. Finney, Second-generation dimeric inhibitors of chitin

synthase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12, 6451–6460 (2004). Medline doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.027

44. I. D. Linney, I. M. McDonald, PCT International Application 2001085704 (2001). 45. A. Ali, et al., PCT International Application 2007070173 (2007). 46. L. S. Bertram, M. C. T. Fyfe, M. J. Procter, G. M. Williams, PCT International

Application 2007116229 (2007). 47. G. P. Tochtrop, G. T. DeKoster, D. P. Cistola, D. F. Covey, A simple efficient

synthesis of [23,24]-(13)C(2)-labeled bile salts as NMR probes of protein-ligand interactions. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12, 433–435 (2002). Medline doi:10.1016/S0960-894X(01)00763-6

48. U. K. Medivir, Peptimmune, patent application WO2006, A1 (2006). 49. S. F. Dowdy, B. R. Meade, K. Gogoi, patent application US2015/238516 A1

(2015). 50. R. Clark, et al., patent application WO2011/145747 A1 (2011). 51. Rohm and Haas Company, patent application E B1, 213718 (1991). 52. D. L. Flynn et al., patent application US2014/275016 A1 (2014). 53. V. Guerlavais, D. Boeglin, D. Mousseaux, C. Oiry, A. Heitz, R. Deghenghi, V.

Locatelli, A. Torsello, C. Ghé, F. Catapano, G. Muccioli, J. C. Galleyrand, J. A. Fehrentz, J. Martinez, New active series of growth hormone secretagogues. J. Med. Chem. 46, 1191–1203 (2003). Medline doi:10.1021/jm020985q

54. G. L. Lackner, K. W. Quasdorf, L. E. Overman, Direct construction of quaternary carbons from tertiary alcohols via photoredox-catalyzed fragmentation of tert-alkyl N-phthalimidoyl oxalates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15342–15345 (2013). Medline doi:10.1021/ja408971t

55. D. E. A. Brittain, C. M. Griffiths-Jones, M. R. Linder, M. D. Smith, C. McCusker, J. S. Barlow, R. Akiyama, K. Yasuda, S. V. Ley, Total Synthesis of Antascomicin B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 2732–2737 (2005). doi:10.1002/anie.200500174

56. Y. Yang, X. Fu, J. Chen, H. Zhai, Total Synthesis of (−)-Jiadifenin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9825–9828 (2012). doi:10.1002/anie.201203176

57. I. Fleming, R. Henning, D. C. Parker, H. E. Plaut, P. E. J. Sanderson, The phenyldimethylsilyl group as a masked hydroxy group. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 4, 317 (1995). doi:10.1039/p19950000317

58. L. Ackermann, A. R. Kapdi, C. Schulzke, Air-stable secondary phosphine oxide or chloride (Pre)ligands for cross-couplings of unactivated alkyl chlorides. Org. Lett. 12, 2298–2301 (2010). Medline doi:10.1021/ol100658y

59. J. Zhou, G. C. Fu, Palladium-catalyzed negishi cross-coupling reactions of unactivated alkyl iodides, bromides, chlorides, and tosylates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 12527–12530 (2003). Medline doi:10.1021/ja0363258

60. T. Connolly, Z. Wang, M. A. Walker, I. M. McDonald, K. M. Peese, Tandem ring-closing metathesis/transfer hydrogenation: Practical chemoselective hydrogenation of alkenes. Org. Lett. 16, 4444–4447 (2014). Medline doi:10.1021/ol5019739

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial support for this work was provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Catalan Government (Postdoctoral Fellowship to J.C.), Department of Defense (NDSEG fellowship to J.T.E.), NIH (F32GM117816 Postdoctoral Fellowship to L.R.M.) China Scholarship Council (postdoctoral fellowship to C.L.) and NIGMS (GM106210). We thank Dr. D.-H. Huang and Dr. L. Pasternack for assistance with NMR spectroscopy; Dr. M. Collins for providing samples of atorvastatin, cetirizine and pregabalin; Mr. Riley Mills for experimental assitance; Dr. A. Rheingold, Dr. C. E. Moore, and Dr. M. A. Galella for x-ray crystallographic analysis; and Dr. K. Chen for helpful discussions. Metrical parameters for the structures of 11 and 73 are available free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center under reference numbers CCDC-1457710 and CCDC-1457711 respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/science.aaf6123/DC1 Materials and Methods Supplementary Text Figs. S1 to S3 Tables S1 to S6 References (34–60)

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 4

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

4 March 2016; accepted 11 April 2016 Published online 21 April 2016 10.1126/science.aaf6123

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 5

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

Fig. 1. Development of a Ni-catalyzed decarboxylative alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling. (A) Activation of carboxylic acids in organic synthesis. (B) Potential side-products. (C) Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling of redox-active esters and alkylzinc reagents.

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 6

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

Fig. 2. Scope of the Ni-catalyzed decarboxylative alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling. Standard conditions: redox-active ester (1 equiv.), dialkylzinc reagent (2 equiv.), NiCl2·glyme (20 mol%), L2 (40 mol%), THF:DMF, 25°C, 8-14 hours. THF=tetrahydrofuran; DMF=dimethylformamide.

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 7

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

Fig. 3. Ni-catalyzed decarboxylative alkyl-alkyl coupling in solid phase synthesis. *See Supplementary Materials for experimental details.

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 8

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

Fig. 4. Scope of the Ni-catalyzed three-component conjunctive cross-coupling. Standard conditions: redox-active ester (1 equiv.), acceptor (2.5 equiv.), PhZnCl·LiCl complex (3 equiv.), NiCl2·glyme (20 mol%), L2 (40 mol%), THF:DMF, 25°C, 8 hours. THF, tetrahydrofuran; DMF, dimethylformamide. All the products shown were obtained in a racemic form.

First release: 21 April 2016 www.sciencemag.org (Page numbers not final at time of first release) 9

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from

A general alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling enabled by redox-active esters and alkylzinc reagents

Phil S. BaranTian Qin, Josep Cornella, Chao Li, Lara R. Malins, Jacob T. Edwards, Shuhei Kawamura, Brad D. Maxwell, Martin D. Eastgate and

published online April 21, 2016

ARTICLE TOOLS http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/04/20/science.aaf6123

MATERIALSSUPPLEMENTARY http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2016/04/20/science.aaf6123.DC1

REFERENCES

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/04/20/science.aaf6123#BIBLThis article cites 44 articles, 1 of which you can access for free

PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions

Terms of ServiceUse of this article is subject to the

is a registered trademark of AAAS.ScienceScience, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement ofScience

Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science

on October 9, 2020

http://science.sciencem

ag.org/D

ownloaded from