A Funny Thing Happened… Brian Paradis. A Funny Thing Happened…Emergency Department Enterprise.
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Preclearance
-
Upload
paul-simon-public-policy-institute -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
146 -
download
0
description
Transcript of A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Preclearance
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Preclearance
forPaul Simon Public Policy Institute
Colleen Coyle MathisApril 30, 2013
AIRC Overview
• Creation• Process• Results• Lessons Learned
2
“In a spasm of good sense…”
• Arizona’s redistricting process is governed by the state Constitution, as amended by voters in 2000 with the passage of Proposition 106.
• It stipulates that the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission redraw Arizona’s congressional and legislative districts to reflect the results of the most recent census.
• Passed with 56% of the vote
3
Origins of Proposition 106
4
• A serendipitous combination of champions:– Two non partisan organizations: League of Women Voters and
Common Cause– A native Arizonan with money in the bank who wanted to
give back• Goal: A healthy exchange of ideas and better
governance• Poll conducted to determine what people really want.
“Let the People Draw the Lines”• Over 200,000 signatures collected to get Prop 106 on
the ballot
Proposition 106
“Relating to ending the practice of gerrymandering and improving voter and candidate participation in elections by creating an independent commission of balanced appointments to oversee the mapping of fair and competitive districts.”
5
Some Arizona Context• ~ 6.4 million people (3.5 million in Maricopa County)• 2 x the land area of Illinois• 21 Native American reservations (rural and urban)• Growing Hispanic/Latino population ~ 30%• From 2000 to 2010, Arizona added almost 1 million new registered
voters. Of that, 19% went to Republicans, 18% to Democrats, and nearly 63% chose to be Independents.
– Republicans: 35.4 %– Democrats: 30.4 % – Independent/Other: 34.2%
6
What are the requirements of the State Constitution via Prop 106?New district boundaries must:A: Comply with the U.S Constitution and the Voting
Rights ActB: Equal Population
Criteria A and B are federally mandated.
To the extent practicable the districts must be:C: Compact and ContiguousD: Respect communities of interestE: Use visible geographic features, city, town and county
boundaries, and undivided Census TractsF: Favor competitive districts where no significant
detriment to other goals 7
A: Voting Rights Act– Arizona is one of 9 states covered as a whole meaning
that its congressional and legislative districts must receive preclearance or approval from the Department of Justice or a federal court under Section 5. To get preclearance, Arizona must demonstrate that the new districts do not discriminate against minority voters in purpose or effect, which means there can be no intentional or accidental discrimination.
– Under Section 5, Arizona's redistricting plans cannot be retrogressive. The plans cannot weaken or reduce minority voters' rights.
– The presence of discrimination can be determined by analyzing population data and election results. 8
Step 1: Setting up the Commission – Commissioners are appointed following a thorough screening process.
Timeline
9
Process
ProcessStep 2: First-Round Hearings
Before drawing a single line, the Commission held 23 public hearings around the state in July and August to get input from the public about issues relevant to redistricting such as geography, communities of interest, minority voting rights, and competitiveness.
10
29,000+ miles traveled
11
12Maps
The AIRC Wants You to Stay Connected
Maps Meetings
Public Input
ProcessStep 3: Mapping – • Start with a clean slate• Then divide the state into equal population in a grid
like pattern -- Grid Maps Approved August 18, 2011.• After adopting the grid maps, the Commission met
more than 25 times to consider adjustments to the grid to accommodate all of the state constitutional criteria. During this time they received additional public comment and draft maps.
• Approval of Draft Maps – Occurred on October 3, 2011 for the congressional map and October 10 for the legislative. 13
Previous Congressional Map
14
Starting Point – New Congressional Map
15
New Congressional Grid Map
16
New Congressional Draft Map
17
The draft congressional districts included:
•Two predominantly rural districts •Three border districts •Three districts in the greater Tucson region •Five districts that are entirely in Maricopa County
•It avoids splitting Arizona's Indian Reservations
•Two districts where minority voters have the opportunity to elect their candidate of choice
ProcessStep 4: Second Round Hearings – • Visited 30 towns and cities all over the state
to share the draft maps and receive additional public input during October and November 2011.
18
What does Independent mean?
• It means independent from the Legislature.• It does not mean that politics is entirely
removed from the process
19
20
21
“After having been served written notice and provided with an opportunity for response, a member of the IRC may be removed by the Governor, with the concurrence of 2/3 of the Senate for:
- Substantial neglect of duty- Gross misconduct in office or- Inability to discharge the duties of office.”
Supermajority in Senate with 21 R’s and 9 D’s in combination with a draft map the supermajority didn’t like = Removal of Chair
The Perfect Storm…
22
November 17, 2011Reinstatement by Arizona Supreme Court
23
Step 5: Final Maps• Upon completion of the public comment period, the
AIRC adopted tentative final maps December 21, 2011 and final maps January 17, 2012.
Step 6: Preclearance • The Congressional map was precleared April 9, 2012
and the legislative map on April 26, 2012.
Sweet Relief
24
Precleared New Congressional Final Map
25
Features:• Four Republican leaning districts (44% of map vs. 35.4% R registration; two Voting Rights Districts (22% of map vs. 30.4% D registration) where minority voters have the opportunity to elect the candidate of their choice; three competitive districts (33% of map compared to 34.2% Ind/Other registration).•Two predominantly rural districts•Three districts in the greater Tucson region•Avoids splitting Arizona's Native American Reservations
Pre-cleared New Congressional Final Map
26
New Legislative Final Map
27
28
Results
• Public had numerous opportunities and methods to engage:– 58 business meetings– 43 public hearings– 5364 in attendance; more than 1800 via internet– 2350 requests to speak– 7403 pieces of public input– 224 maps submitted
2012 Election Results• Congressional:
– 4 safe R seats; 2 safe D seats and 3 competitive• Democrats swept all 3 competitive seats with one race
taking almost two weeks to call (2454 vote difference).• 2 of the competitive seats have been designated as
most likely to flip in 2014 (CD 1 and CD 2)• In 2008, the Arizona delegation was 5D and 3R.
• Legislative:– Senate: 17 R’s and 13 D’s won seats– House: 36 R’s and 24 D’s
29
More Results• First time Arizona has ever received
preclearance on both maps on first try.• Center for Public Integrity conducted a state
integrity investigation and rated all 50 states in 14 areas, one of which was redistricting, for which Arizona received an A, our only one. (source: stateintegrity.org)
• Independent redistricting is preserved…so far.
30
Litigation Happens!
• Shelby County vs. Holder (Constitutionality of VRA) Awaiting US Supreme Court decision
• 3 Pending Arizona Lawsuits:– Leach, et.al. vs. AIRC (challenging Congressional districts in
state court)– Harris, et.al. vs. AIRC (challenging legislative districts in
federal court) (Trial ended 3/29/13). Awaiting decision from 3 judge panel.
– Arizona State Legislature vs. AIRC (assignment of task to redraw Congressional districts is sole purview of Legislature)
• Continue defending maps as necessary
31
Lessons Learned• Importance of shielding commission from
outside partisan forces• Striking the balance between flexibility and
constraint• Having a healthy and courageous 3rd branch of
government and fourth estate• Legislative privilege/immunity; independent
procurement; funding; oversight
32
A potential solution?
33
redistricting
Transparency, Accountability…
34
Are there adjustments to IRC’s composition that make sense?
Having the commission more closely reflect the electorate
– Larger?– Geographic– Partisan – The Rise of the Independent
• 2000: 43% R / 38% D/ 18% Other• 2010: 36% R/ 32% D/ 32% Other
– Racial/ethnic – Hispanic Example• 2000: 1,295,617• 2010: 1,895,149 – 46.3% increase
– Gender 35
If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog. ~ Harry Truman
36
redistricting
Colleen Mathis
37
Thank you …
for your interest in independent redistricting!
(You’ve got a friend in Arizona…)