A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between...
Transcript of A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between...
![Page 1: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
(sn_/“me-___.,,,,,,....._...........__________......._.............____...,,,,,,,.,(er.@ls. iwmi =lkKmmqw~)
‘.ti)>’\ O.‘$ ‘1 ] ’ :“, -,p ) )t’,.) j-1, (^. . . . . . . . . ..1......!....“..................~..~~..... ~,“..............‘“’
q*q (I>\. ) ? I*,,-.; F( \A-). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .a. . . . . . . . . .._....(%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler)&;rAJ .$Y -A L&c,
. . ..__.__.......
(ser.~~.a~~~ ?lAw;alu)
![Page 2: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Thesis Title
Thesis Credits
Candidate
Supervisors
Degree of Study
Department
Academic Year
Strategy for Spring Onion Batch Drying
12
Mr. Manit Sukjindasatean
Prof. Dr. Somchart Soponronnarit
Mr.Somkiat Prachayawarakorn
Master of Engineering
Food Engineering
1 9 9 3
Abstract
The objective of this research was to investigate appropriate strategies for
spring onion fixed-bed drying. The criteria to be considered in this study were
specific energy consumption, drying time and quality of spring onion. This research
consists of studies of physical properties of spring onion variables which affect
drying rate and the development of mathematical model for strategies of spring
onion drying.
The experimental results of physical properties of spring onion showed that
specific heat of spring onion varied linearly with moisture content and the modified
Halsey’s (Iglesias & Chirife(l51) equation could predict the moisture equilbrium fairly
well for the temperature from 38 oC to 74 OC and the relative humidity of air
from 10 % to 90 % The drying rate of the spring onion was mainly controlled by
internal diffusion. The temperature and velocity of air were the most important
factors which affected the drying rate. Page’s model could predict fairly well as
compared to the experimental results.
Simulated results obtained from the mathematical model indicated that
appropriate strategy for spring onion drying should be as follows: for the frist stage,
![Page 5: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
air temperature of 80 OC!, specific air flow rate of 33.9 m3/min-kg dry matter and
drying time of 0.5 h, for the second stage, specific air flow rate of 13.5 m3/min-kg
dry matter, the same temperature and drying time and for the final stage(stage 3)
specific air flow rate of 6.8 m3/min-kg dry matter,drying temperature of 72 OC.
Keywords : Drying parameters / Spring onion drying / Mathematical model /
Energy consumption / Drying strategies
![Page 6: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
4
4
6
a
9
1 1
1 1
12
12
12
13
16
![Page 8: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
24
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
29
29
29
29
30
32
32
35
37
59
59
60
6 1
![Page 9: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
6 3
6 6
6 8
8 4
9 5
101
1 0 3
1 0 5
1 0 7
![Page 10: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
5.1
5.2
l-l
2-l
3-l
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-9
38
3 9
6 4
67
6 9
7 0
71
7 2
7 3
7 4
7 5
7 6
7 7
7 8
![Page 11: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
79
80
81
82
83
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
![Page 12: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2 .1 Relationship between moisture content and drying time
2.2 A typical drying-rate curve
3.1 Control volume of thin layer
3.2 Control volume
4 . 1 D r y e r
4.2 Chopper
5.1 Relationship between specific heat of spring onion and
moisture content
5.2 Isomoisture curves of spring onion at 38 OC
5.3 Isomoisture curves of spring onion at 50 OC
5 .4 Isomoisture curves of spring onion at 62 oC
5.5 Isomoisture curves of spring onion at 74 OC
5.6 Effect of air temperature on drying rate of spring onion at
a superficial velocity of 0.2 m/s
5.7 Effect of air temperature on drying rate of spring onion at
a superficial velocity of 0.5 m/s
5.8 Effect of air temperature on drying rate of spring onion at
a superficial velocity of 0.8 m/s
5.9 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onion
at temperature about 43 OC
5.10 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onion
at temperature about 52 OC
5.11 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onion
at temperature about 63 OC
5.12 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onion
at temperature about 72 OC
5
5
1 6
2 3
2 7
2 8
4 0
4 1
4 1
4 2
4 2
4 3
4 3
4 4
4 4
4 5
4 5
4 6
![Page 13: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
5.13 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onion
at temperature about 84 OC
5.14a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content
of spring onion at different height, test no.1
5.14b Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.1
5.15a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content
of spring onion at different height, test no.2
5.15b Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.2
5.16a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content
of spring onion at different height, test no.3
5.16b Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.3
5.17a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content
of spring onion at different height, test no.4
5.17b Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.4
5.18a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content
of spring onion at different height, test no.5
5.18b Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.5
5.19a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content
of spring onion at different height, test no.6
5.19b Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
4 6
4 7
4 7
4 8
4 8
4 9
4 9
5 0
5 0
51
51
5 2
5 2
content of spring onion, test no.6
![Page 14: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
I
pi
520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content
of spring onion at different height, test no.7
5.20b Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.7
5.21 Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.8
5.22 Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.9
5.23 Comparison between simulated and experimental average moisture
content of spring onion, test no.10
5.24 Effect of specific air flow rate in stage 2 and air temperature
in stage 3 on energy consumption and drying time
5.25 Effect of specific air flow rate in stage 1 and 2 on
energy consumption and drying time
5.26 Effect of relative humidity and temperature of ambient air on
energy consumption and drying time
l - l Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air
and bed-inlet air, test no. 1
1 - 2 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air
and bed-inlet air, test no. 2
1 - 3 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air
and bed-inlet air, test no. 3
1 - 4 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air
and bed-inlet air, test no. 4
l-5 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air
and bed-inlet air, test no. 5
1 - 6 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air
and bed-inlet air, test no. 6
VT21
5 3
5 3
5 4
5 4
5 5
5 6
5 7
5 8
9 6
9 6
9 7
9 7
9 8
9 8
![Page 15: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
I4fil
9 9l-7 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air
and bed-inlet air, test no. 7
1 - 8 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air 9 9
and bed-inlet air, test no. 8
1 - 9 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air 1 0 0
and bed-inlet air, test no. 9
l-10 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity of ambient air
and bed-inlet air, test no. 10
2-l Detail of experimental dryer
3-l Flow Chart of Soponronnarit Model [12]
1 0 0
1 0 4
1 0 6
![Page 16: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
A =
c =
D =
d =
db =
dx =
hfg =
G =
cl, =
K =
k =
L =
M =
MR =
m II
N =
P =
cl =
R =
RH =
T =
t =
u =
vu =
V II
w =
![Page 17: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
wm
WS
wb
X
a
abs
db
eq
f
in
Pw
V
wb
![Page 18: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
3
![Page 21: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
5
TIME (h)
Fig. 2.1 Relationship between moisture content and drying time
E‘ falling , constantcv<
rate - - - - - -----__
)e\*
FREE MOISTURE (kg water/kg dry solid)
Fig. 2.2 A typical drying-rate curve
![Page 23: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
6
2.2 ~~ni%~UL~3Ii~wnw~ (Theoretical Drying Equation)
m = -AD Z/C% (2.1)
![Page 24: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
~IM%J infinite cylinder !,$uIA~%I
m = .5(4/&xp(-qJ2 14))n=l
(2.6)
2.3 tW~l~~~LL~~~~W~~~ (Semi-Theoretical Drying Equation)
MR = 8/ ~r~exp(-D(t/2x)~) (2.7)
dlnD/dT = A/RT2 (2.8)
dM/dt = -K(M-Meq) (2.9)
![Page 26: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
MR = exp(-Kt) (2.10)
K = A exp(-B/Tabs) (2.11)
MR = exp (-Kt) (2.12)
1 Flu
K = 0.01138 + 0.03299 RH0.85g + 21.9514 exp (-2407.98/T) + .0021077v
2.4 ~~n13~~bb~~9inwanl~~~a~~ (Empirical Drying Equation)
![Page 27: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
10
MR = exp(-KtN) (2.13)
t=b&~~b~ua K = 0.0466 - 0.0114 RH2
N = 0.402 + 0.00728 T RH
ua3h&l~ K = 0.0333 + 0.0003 T
N = 0.3744 + 0.00916 T RH
MR = exp (-Kt0.76) (2.14)
Ivlilu
K = - 0.661422087 + 0.018479T + 0.7222827RH - 9 x 10-5T2 - 0.014758 T RH
MR = exp (-KtN) (2.15)
K = exp (7.53093 - 7.52771RH + 0.44859v2 + 5,3540211n(RH)
+ 1.2719211n(v) - 0.29792 T RH - 6.79225 RH v -1.048963-04 T2 v2
+ 7.99807 v RH2 + 3.23764 x 1O-3 RH T2)
N = -1.82767 + 2.250163 x lo-3T2+ 6.04474RH - 2.77503RH2
- 1.141791nRH - 0.0124 T RH
![Page 28: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
11
1 -RH = exp( -CT Meqn) (2.16)
i=Q.mi%aas Chung bb~z Pfost [9]
RH = exp[(-a/T) exp(-bMeq)] (2.17)
M eq = (-ln(l-RH)/F(T+G))liE (2.18)
1 mu G = 190.62 + 10.632T
F = 0.08855 - 0.002414T + 0.0000224T2
E = 1.8033 - 0.00728T
![Page 29: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
12
In RH = (-5135,0307/R T) exp (-0.0605 Meq) (2.19)
WLI~%SY?J~~ Henderson [8]
l-RH = exp (-2.1083x10-4 T(100Meq)0.8383) (2.20)
C = 1.025 + 5.220 M (2.21)
p = 1306 + 234M (2.22)
![Page 30: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
13
VV = 0.001997 + 0.0012 M (2.23)
CaTo+Wo(hfg+C,To)+RCp, 0 = CaTbd+Wbd(hfg+C”Tbd)+RCp,Tbd (2.24)
Meq = f 0, 4) (2.25)
![Page 31: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
14
(MmMeq)i(Min-Meq) = exp (-KtN) (2.26)
Mf = (M - dM,&(l - d) (2.27)
d = -KNAtt(N-1)
wf - Wbd = (Mbd - Mf)R (2.28)
C,Tbd+Wbd(hfg+C,Tbd)+RCpwTbd = C,Tf+Wf(hfS+C,Tf)+RCpwTf (2.29)
![Page 32: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
15
C,T,+W,(hfg+C,T,)+RCp,T, = C,Tf+Wf(hfg+C,Tf)+RCpwTf (2.30)
Mf = M, - (Wf - W, )/R (2.31)
VV = f (M) (2.37)
![Page 33: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
“7
W T C C0’ f’ a’ v
x + AX
W. 7, Sa ,C ”
Fig. 3.1 Control volume of thin layer
![Page 34: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
17
~,To+Wo(hfg+~vTo)+R~p, 8 = C,Tbd+Wbd(hfg+CvTbd)+RCpwTbd (3.1)
M eq = (exp(l.844056-O.O1548Tbd)/-ln(RH))(l/l,36116) (3.2)
b&
(M-Meq)/(Min-Meq) = exp (-KtN)
K = exp(-4.67879-tO.073218 T-0.19866/v-O.OOq24 T2 )
(3.3)
N = exp(0.014273-0.01268 T+0.05006/v+0.000053 T2 )
~l~~~~~~~~~~nl~ (3.8) a$ELU?J t LLCC~%W&l Finite Differences $h-OJ.kMl
~alaJ~~~~s~~wo~~~~~~~~~a1 At
Mf = (M - dMeq)/(l - d) (3.4)
![Page 35: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
18
%WJid d = -KNAtt(N-1)
wf - Wbd = (Mbd - Mf)R (3.5)
C,Tbd+wbd(hfg+C,Tbd)+RCpwTbd = C,Tf+Wf(hfS+C,Tf)+RCpVVTf (3.6)
C,T,+W,(hfg+C,T,)+RCp,T, = C,Tf+Wf(hfg+C,Tf)+RCpwTf (3.7)
Mf = M, - (Wf - W, J/R (3.8)
![Page 36: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
19
VV = 0.025505 + 0.004812 M - 0.00034227 M2 + 9.47x1O-6 M3 (3.9)
maCaT + maW2(hfg + C,T2) - maCaT - maWl(hfg+CvTl) = Ql+W, (3.10)
ma(Ca+ WlC”) (T2 - Tl) = Ql+W, (3.11)
![Page 37: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
20
m&,+ WlC,) (T2 - Tl) = W, (3.12)
W, = @(ma/p,/ qf) (3.13)
Wm = Ws/qm (3.14)
APg,/L=150(1- E)~,uv/ (q$d,)2(t)3 +1.75(1- &+v2 / (&,d,)(t)3 (3.15)
![Page 38: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
21
APg, /L= 150(1- E)‘,Dv/ (4,d,)z(t)3 , Rep < 20 (3.16)
hpg,/ L = 1.75( l- &+v2 / (&,d,)( E)’ , Rep > 1000 (3.17)
![Page 39: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
22
ma&T3 + maW3(hfg + C,T3) - maCaT - maW2(hfg+C,T2) = Q+Q2 (3.22)
m,(C,+ WC,) (T3 - T2) = 0 (3.23)
![Page 40: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
23
![Page 41: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
25
![Page 43: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
26
![Page 44: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
27
![Page 45: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Fig. 4.2 Chopper
![Page 46: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
M eq = (ln(1 -RH)/-aT)(l/b) (5.2)
![Page 47: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
30
Chung-Pfost 191
M eq = (-l/b)ln(Tln(RH)/-a) ( 5 . 3 )
Modified Halsey (Iglesias & Chirife [15] )
Meq = (expja-bT)/-ln(RH))(l/d) ( 5 . 4 )
M eq = (ln(l-RH)/-0.0215734T)(1/1.2708) , r2 = 0.78 ( 5 . 5 )
Chung-Pfost [9] Wfl8Wlls$ (5.3)k%Wl7T~d~
Meq = (-1/5,48689)ln(Tln(RH)/-567.0792) , r2 = 0.75 (5.6)
Modified Halsey (Iglesias & Chirife [15]) w~EW~II~~ (5.4) ~%WK&I<
M aq = (exp(1.844056-0,01548T)/-ln(RH))(l/l.36116) ,r2 = 0.94 (5.7)
![Page 48: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
31
Exponential Model $bWhQdnlS
MR = exp(-Kt) (5.8)
kaz Page’s Model =$hEIElG~ni~
MR = exp(-KtN) (5.9)
N = exp(0.014273-0 01268*T+0.05006/v+0.000053*T2) ,r2 = 0.948 (5.11)
![Page 49: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
32
![Page 50: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
33
![Page 51: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
34
VV = 0.025505 + 0.004812 M - 0.00034227 M2 + 9.47*10m6 M3 , r2 = 0.96 (5.12)
![Page 52: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
3 5
![Page 53: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
36
![Page 54: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
37
![Page 55: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
”m-!
d
6
7
8
**
9
*x
1 0
**
* w
qrun@
COG)
7 3
7 2
7 2
6 6
7 8
61
7 8
6 3
7 2
6 2
6 7
6 7
80
80
75
71
71
6 6
in4Tillh a1 a
&5ini-ilna
51LWl.-mJ
aimpI
(m3/min-kg
dry matter)
"mJ&
L %I&4
(%wb)
sim’
11.1
15.2
29.5
22.2
26.8
94.6
94.6
95.1
94.9
94.6
8 . 5
10.1
5.5
9.3
8.9
20.6 94.6 1 1 . 1
24.0 95.0 10.7
4.00
3.50
4.00
4.00
1.50
2.00
1.50
1.50
1.50
2.00
1.85
1.15
0.50
0.50
1.85
0.50
0.50
2.00
-* 7nmn 3 n-u: rh 1 na:: 1 Simulation
31.3
10.4
28.1
21.1
7.0
27.3
19.3
5 . 8
94.6 13.9
94.1
94.3
6.6
12.3
rexP
2
7.5*
10.5
9.4
8.3
8.9'
sim -P em exrl
0.10 0.23
0.12 0.19
0.26 0.22
0.20 0.24
0.17 0.22
s,m
6.63
6.85
14.94
8.96
7.96
8.30
7.85
15.92
9.40
8.97
sim
6 . 8 9
7 . 1 6
15.62
9.48
8.40
8.90
8.36
16.55
10.01
9.55
9.1* 0.1 4 0 . 1 8 7.94 8.64 8.30 9.1 1
6.8 0.19 0.21 8.91 9.10 9.40 9.66
10.0 0.27 0.1 1 8.82 9.34 9.52 9.69
6.9* 0.1 3
0.12
0.08 6.35 5.84 6.56
7.2 0.1 1
5.50
5.05 6.20 5.36 6.49
2 Experiment
(MJ/kg-H20 evap.)
wa’~wainGi Wt%Jltbll;lJ~ij
(MJ/kg- H20 evap.) (MJ/kgH20 evap.)
Wco
![Page 56: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
mlnl=i~~sndlLwlYLl09
oifmI.sa~ad 1
(m3/min-kg dry matter)
SlUKL&JFl
33.9
30.5
27.1
23.7
33.9 23.7 13.5
7.89 7.00 6.1 7
2.55 2.60 2.70
5 1 . 6 0 5 3 . 3 0 56.70
7.63 6.74 5.96
2.60 2.65 2.80
5 4 . 3 0 5 6 . 1 0 59.60
7.42 6.53 5.75
2.70 2.75 2.90
5 7 . 4 0 5 9 . 2 0 62.90
7.27 6.38 5.60
2.85 2.90 3.05
61 .OO 62.90 66.60
WW
![Page 57: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
40
-model +K experiment
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Moisture content (% wb)
Fig. 5.1 Relationship between specific heat of spring onionand moisture content
![Page 58: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
4 1
Ea 0.8E8
$ 0.67l.-
EE 0.43.-ii.-=$0.2
W
00 1 0 2 0 30 40 5 0 60 7 0 80 90 100
% Relative humidity
Fig. 5.2 lsomoisture curves of spring onion at 38’C
m experiment - Modified Halsey
- - Chung & Pfost - -Henderson
0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 90 1 0 0
% Relative humidity
Fig. 5.3 lsomoisture curves of spring onion at 50 5
![Page 59: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
42
; 0.43‘L12. -=$0.2
W
00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% Relative humidity
Fig. 5.4 lsomoisture curves of spring onion at 62 C
, 1 / m experiment -Modified Halsey 1
229
5 0.8E8
f 0.6z.-
E
- - Chung & Pfost --Henderson
0 lo 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% Relative humidity
Fig. 5.5 lsopoisture curves of spring onion at 74’C
![Page 60: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
43
1.2
1
go.8
0‘Gz 0.6
552 0.4
0.2
0
-Temp 43.9OC + Temp 53.9OC * Temp 64.5OC
+ Temp 71.4’C * Temp 85.5’C
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time (min)
Fig. 5.6 Effect of air temperature on drying rate of spring onionat a superficial velocity of 0.2 m/s
1.2
l-
go.8 -
0‘G2 0.6-23zg 0.4 -
-Temp 43.0°C f Temp 53.0 “C * Temp 63.8 “C
++ Temp 73.0°C *Temp 84.2’C
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time (min)
Fig. 5.7 Effect of air temperature on drying rate of spring onion
at a superficial velocity of 0.5 m/s
![Page 61: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
44
1.2---Temp 43.8’C f Temp 52.6’C * Temp 62.5 “C
++ Temp 72.7’C * Temp 84.1 ‘C
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Time (min)
Fig. 5.8 Effect of air temperature on drying rate of spring onionat a superficial velocity of 0.8 m/s
1.2+-v 0.2 m/s,Temp 43.9 “C + v 0.5 m/s,Temp 42.9OC
*v 0.8 m/s,Temp 43.8 “C
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Time (min)
Fig. 5.9 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onionat temperature about 43’C
![Page 62: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
4 5
0 . 2
0
I I-v 0.2 m/s,Temp 54.O’C +v 0.5 m/s,Temp 53.0°C
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 1 8 0 2 0 0
Time (min)
Fig. 5.10 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onionat temperature about 52%
1.2+v 0.2 m/s,Temp 64.5’C +v 0.5 m/s,Temp 63.8OC
1
SO.8
0‘G
; 0.6
35g 0.4
A
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 1 8 0
Time (min)
Fig. 5.11 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onionat temperature about 63%
![Page 63: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
46
1.2 --“v 0.2 m/s,Temp 71.3OC i-v 0.5 m/s,Temp 73.0 “C
*v 0.8 m/s,Temp 72.7’C
go.8
0.2
0 k0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time (min)
Fig. 5.12 Effect of superficial velorzity on drying rate of spring onionat temperature about 72 C
1.2..-=-v 0.2 m/s,Temp 85.5’C +v 0.5 m/s,Temp 84.2 "C
*v 0.8 m/s,Temp 84.1 “C
40 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130
Time (min)
Fig. 5.13 Effect of superficial velocity on drying rate of spring onionat temperature about 84’C
![Page 64: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
47
a
-simulation *experimentini
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Moisture content (% wb)
Fig. 5.14a Comparison between simulated and experimentalmoisture content of spring onion at differentheight, test no.1
- simulation m experiment
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Time (min)
Fig. 5.14b Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion,test no.1
![Page 65: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
48
10- simulation * experiment
V,
initial
a
2?6sz 210 min. -% 4
2
!
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Moisture content (% wb)
Fig. 5.15a Comparison between simulated and experimentalmoisture content of spring onion at differentheight, test no.2
-simulation +K experiment
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210
Time (min)
Fig. 5.15b Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion,test no.2
![Page 66: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
49
o -
- simulation * experimentini
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Moisture content (“% wb)
Fig. 5.16a Comparison between simulated and experimentalmoisture content of spring onion at differentheight, test no.3
90
80
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Time (min)
Fig. 5.16b Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion,test no.3
![Page 67: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
50
10
8
-simulation * experimentini
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Moisture content (% wb)
3%
ta
Fig. 5.17a Comparison between simulated and experimentalmoisture content of spring onion at differentheight, test no.4
I
- simulation x experiment- simulation x experiment
60 --
50--
40 -~-
30 -.-
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Time (min)
Fig. 5.17b Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion,test no.4
![Page 68: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
51
10
a
-simulation *experimentinii
>c
210 min x
/../
90 mi
30 min
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Moisture conten @ wb)
Fig. 5.1aa Comparison between simulated and experimentalmoisture content of spring onion at differentheight, test no.5
-simulation m experiment
80zi-
-I3 70 -8
30 30 60 90 120 150 180 210
Time (min)
Fig. 5.18b Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion,test no.5
![Page 69: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
52
-simulation * experimentinit
180 min
I+0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Moisture content @ wb)
Fig. 5.19a Comparison between simulated and experimentalmoisture conten of spring onion at differentheight, test no.6
- simulation m experiment- simulation m experiment
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Time (min)
Fig. 5.19b Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion, test no.6
![Page 70: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
53
110 ~-
8-r
- simulation * experiment
\,
initial
%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Moisture content (% wb)
Fig. 5.20a Comparison between simulated and experimentalmoisture content of spring onion at differentheight, test no.7
-I60 90 120 150 180 210
Time (min)
Fig. 5.20b Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion,test no.7
![Page 71: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
54
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Time (min)
Fig. 5.21 Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion,test no.8
100
90
i% 40
g 30a
20
10
060 90 120 150
Time (min)
Fig. 5.22 Comparison between simulated and experimentalaverage moisture content of spring onion,test no.9
![Page 72: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
55
- simulation m experiment
60 -c ,\
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Time (min)
Fig. 5.23 Comparison between simulated and experimental
average moisture content of spring onion,test no.10
![Page 73: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
56
h
$10t
XGs233.9 %s223.8 +-Gs213.6 105 t
I I I / I I/ 0
57 59 6 1 63 65 67 69 7 1
Air temp. (“C) in stage 3
Fig.5.24 Effect of specific air flow rate in stage 2 and air temperature instage 3 on energy consumption and drying time[Air temperature in stage 1 = 8,0°C, 0.5 hAir temperature in stage 2 = 80 C, 0.5 hSpecific air flow rate in stage 1 = 33.9 m A 3/min-kg dry matterSpecific air flow rate in stage 3 = 6.8 m”3/min-kg dry matterGs2 = Specific air flow rate in stage 2, m ^3/min-kg dry matter]
![Page 74: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
57
-u-Gs133.9 tGs130.5 yIc Gs127.1
I
10-II- Gs123.7
4- energy 8
t i m e Pb
I I I I I I I I I ( 0
13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33
Specific air flow rate in stage 2 (m” 3/min-kg dry matter)
Fig. 5.25 Effect of specific air flow rate in stage 1 and stage 2 on energyconsumption and drying time,
[Air temperature in stage 1 = 80°C ,0.5 h
Air temperature in stage 2 = 80°C ,0.5 h
Air temperature in stage 3 = 72’CG S. = specific air flow rate in stage 1, m ^3/min-kg dry matter
Specific air flow rate in stage 3 = 6.8 m”3/min-kg dry matter]
![Page 75: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
58
- Temp 30 ‘C i- Temp 35 “C * Temp 40 ‘C
energy
1 I I I I I I I +3 5 4 0 45 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5 7 0 7 5 8 0
Relative humidity (%)
Fig. 5.26 Effect of relative humidity and temperature of ambient airon energy consumption and drying time
1 0
8
![Page 76: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
![Page 77: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
60
![Page 78: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
4. Chiang, W.C. and Peterson, J.N., 1985, “Thin Layer Air Drying of French Fried
Pototoes,” Journal of Food Technology, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 67-78.
5. Hutchison, D. and Otten, L., 1983, “Thin-layer Air Drying of Soybeans and
White Beans,” Journal of Food Technology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 507-522.
8. Henderson, S.M., 1952, “A Basic Concept of Equilibium,” Agricultural
Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 29-31.
![Page 79: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
62
9 Chung, D.S. and Pfost, H.P., 1967, “Adsorption and Desorption of Water Vapor
by Cereal Grains and Their Products,” Transactions of the ASAE, Vol. 10,
No. 4, pp. 549-557.
12. Soponronnarit, S., 1988, “Energy Model of Grain Drying System,” The ASEAN
Journal of Science Technology for Development, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 43-68.
13. Kunii, D., 1969, Fluidization Engineering, New York, John Wiley and Sons,
pp. 66-70.
15. Iglesias, H.A. and Chirife, J., 1976, “Prediction of Effect of Temperature on
Water Sorption Isotherms of Food Materials,” Journal of Food Technology,
Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 109-116.
![Page 80: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
![Page 81: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
64
G&(% wb)
93.79
92.69
92.30
91.24
90.60
89.08
86.61
85.75
83.93
80.42
78.32
65.44
53.33
53.18
43.81
40.17
25.61
18.20
10.75
GlVGil
t%A~au
&A
(9)
30.88
30.42
25.84
28.15
31.60
27.83
22.07
28.41
28.23
20.18
25.79
20.97
12.15
7.66
10.69
20.85
6.11
8.36
5.63
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
97.71
icp4@GYuvlaBJ
i%J
(“cl31.9
31.3
29.6
29.8
32.0
30.0
29.8
29.8
29.8
31.8
29.8
32.2
31.7
32.0
31.8
32.8
31.8
31.8
32.2
75.4
69.9
71.8
69.8
74.5
70.2
73.3
72.5
71.2
71.0
73.8
71.1
70.6
73.4
72.4
71.5
70.0
71.4
71.1
FpuMqzLkwGihai
(“cl31.9
31.3
29.6
29.8
32.0
30.0
29.8
29.8
29.8
31.8
29.8
32.2
31.7
32.0
31.8
32.8
31.8
31.8
32.2
pbM@J WJlLJ%~
wxJqa xilbWl~
(“cl (kJ/kg-OC)
57.8 4.083
54.9 3.555
55.5 4.086
54.6 3.512
57.4 3.909
54.5 3.962
57.6 3.587
55.8 3.903
55.0 3.936
57.0 3.737
57.6 3.355
57.7 3.010
58.3 3.073
61.3 2.236
60.3 2.045
58.2 2.991
59.0 2.231
60.0 1.623
60.2 1.063
![Page 82: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
65
-m,C,(t,-t,)-m,C,(t,-t,)c, = -----------------------------------------
m,(t,-t,)
![Page 83: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
611flw~tban Y. fn%M~awvn desorption isotherm YEKJG%AMEIFI.J&-I
![Page 84: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
6 7
@1319~ 2- 1 fll%I’lGlJ1ACNMl desorption isotherm “UCI~~P~M~D%J&J
1 %db
![Page 85: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
![Page 86: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
6 9
b-291
(pblfq
0 70.44 12.02 1 .oooo
10 53.41 8.87 0.7355
20 42.02 6.77 0.5587
30 33.30 5.15 0.4233
4 0 27.71 4.12 0.3365
50 23.78 3.39 0.2755
60 20.82 2.85 0.2295
7 0 18.41 2.40 0.1921
80 16.56 2.06 0.1634
90 15.04 1.78 0.1398
100 13.78 1.55 0.1202
110 12.70 1.35 0.1034
120 11.76 1.17 0.0888
130 10.99 1.03 0.0769
140 10.31 0.91 0.0663
150 9.73 0.79 0.0573
160 9.22 0.70 0.0494
170 8.83 0.63 0.0433
180 8.44 0.56 0.0373
190 8.12 0.50 0.0323
YizzFw
![Page 87: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
7 0
LTIAI
(Ulf!) (nh)
0 7 1 . 8 0
10 5 0 . 0 5
2 0 3 6 . 5 4
3 0 2 8 . 5 9
4 0 2 3 . 4 5
5 0 1 9 . 8 9
6 0 1 7 . 3 3
7 0 1 5 . 3 4
8 0 1 3 . 7 5
9 0 1 2 . 4 9
1 0 0 1 1 . 3 5
1 1 0 1 0 . 4 5
1 2 0 9 . 6 9
1 3 0 9 . 0 6
1 4 0 8 . 4 9
1 5 0 8 . 0 3
1 6 0 7 . 6 2
1 7 0 7 . 2 9
1 8 0 6 . 9 8
,ivii%u7h.ms~u~o~~~ 4.5 1 n%
--.iKK(db)
14.92 1 .oooo
10.10 0 . 6 7 4 2
7 . 1 0 0 . 4 7 1 9
5 . 3 4 0 . 3 5 2 9
4 . 2 0 0 . 2 7 5 9
3 . 4 1 0 . 2 2 2 6
2 . 8 4 0 . 1 8 4 3
2 . 4 0 0 . 1 5 4 5
2 . 0 5 0 . 1 3 0 6
1 . 7 7 0 . 1 1 1 8
1 . 5 2 0 . 0 9 4 7
1 . 3 2 0 . 0 8 1 2
1 . 1 5 0 . 0 6 9 8
1 . 0 1 0 . 0 6 0 4
0 . 8 8 0 . 0 5 1 9
0 . 7 8 0 . 0 4 5 0
0 . 6 9 0 . 0 3 8 9
0 . 6 2 0 . 0 3 3 9
0 . 5 5 0 . 0 2 9 3
WJlaJLbia~~ia~ 0 . 5 bzJGl%/%di
![Page 88: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
7 1
bTJk71
(pblfi)
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
1 1 0
1 2 0
1 3 0
1 4 0
1 5 0
1 6 0
1 7 0
1 8 0
1 9 0
2 0 0
2 1 0
-iiizL-(W
1 2 . 5 5
7 . 9 1
5 . 3 2
3 . 8 0
2 . 9 1
2 . 3 4
1 . 9 3
1 . 6 2
1 . 2 0
1 . 0 4
0 . 9 2
0 . 8 5
0 . 8 0
0 . 7 1
0 . 6 3
0 . 5 7
0 . 5 1
0 . 4 7
0 . 4 3
0 . 4 0
0 . 3 7
0 . 3 5
tii~Pb”nUPs”sYa~~uMaaJ~~ 5 . 2 8 n?i +T-m~biaaa&~ 0 . 8 aa.m/%di
~sracsa?ans-a~i&lr~~~ini~~~~~~~~~a~~ 3 1 .I0 OC
qsrav\s?Dn9-anlira~~n~lnl~~~a~~~~~a~~ 2 6 . 3 2 OC
km.J~u~~w”wi~aJiauLa~~ 3 5 . 5 7 % nala~<~auqa 0 . 1 1 0 3 d b
Exponential Model r2 = 0.85, Page’s Model r2 = 0.98
7 1 . 5 4
4 7 . 0 2
3 3 . 3 5
2 5 . 3 3
2 0 . 6 3
1 7 . 6 3
1 5 . 4 7
1 3 . 8 4
1 1 . 6 1
1 0 . 7 7
1 0 . 1 2
9 . 7 7
9 . 4 8
9 . 0 3
8 . 6 1
8 . 2 8
7 . 9 9
7 . 7 6
7 . 5 5
7 . 3 6
7 . 2 2
7 . 1 0
1 .oooo
0 . 6 2 6 6
0 . 4 1 8 5
0 . 2 9 6 4
0 . 2 2 4 8
0 . 1 7 9 1
0 . 1 4 6 2
0 . 1 2 1 4
0 . 0 8 7 5
0 . 0 7 4 7
0 . 0 6 4 8
0 . 0 5 9 4
0 . 0 5 5 0
0 . 0 4 8 2
0 . 0 4 1 8
0 . 0 3 6 8
0 . 0 3 2 3
0 . 0 2 8 8
0 . 0 2 5 6
0 . 0 2 2 7
0 . 0 2 0 6
0 . 0 1 8 8
![Page 89: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
72
2 Yb2k71 sa"iPshYuP90ahT~ KllWPA &l$lL+-J~~~laJ"IIu
(Ulwd) (n%) w
0 71.33 11.60 1 .oooo
10 46.00 7.13 0.61 17
20 31.68 4.60 0.3922
30 23.55 3.1 6 0.2676
40 18.46 2.26 0.1 896
50 15.15 1.68 0.1389
60 12.76 1.25 0.1022
70 1 1.04 0.95 0.0759
80 9.80 0.73 0.0569
90 8.88 0.57 0.0428
100 8.23 0.45 0.0328
110 7.70 0.36 0.0247
120 7.38 0.30 0.0198
130 7.12 0.26 0.01 58
140 6.92 0.22 0.0127
150 6.81 0.20 0.01 10
160 6.69 0.1 8 0.0092
170 6.62 0.17 0.008 1
180 6.54 0.1 6 0.0069
190 6.47 0.14 0.0058'ytiimhnU&am&mm%..I 5.66 n?u nalaJLia~aJ~a~ 0.2 baJFl$/%41~
~slaessl~n4-a~~-~~~~~~n~~~~~"~~~~a~~ 32.2 1 OC
~~~pans-a~7~a~~nolnl~~~~~~~~~a~~ 27.1 5 OC
na~a.~~~a~lw"wfaa~iou~a~u 22.55 % vrm.~&wa~~n 0.0753 db
Exponential Model r2 = 0.94, Page's Model r2 = 0.99
![Page 90: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
73
0 71.78 14.64 1 .oooo
10 39.22 7.54 0.51 27
20 24.89 4.42 0.2983
30 17.94 2.91 0.1943
40 13.91 2.03 0.1 340
50 1 1.45 1.49 0.0972
60 9.59 1.09 0.0694
70 8.48 0.85 0.0527
80 7.61 0.66 0.0397
90 6.97 0.52 0.0302
100 6.52 0.42 0.0234
110 6.23 0.36 0.0191
120 5.99 0.30 0.0155
130 5.83 0.27 0.0131
140 5.71 0.24 0.01 13
150 5.61 0.22 0.0098
160 5.54 0.21 0.0088
170 5.54 0.21 0.0088
180 5.49 0.20 0.0080
![Page 91: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
7 4
b291
(lnfi) (n%)
0 7 1 . 9 3
1 0 3 7 . 1 2
2 0 2 3 . 7 3
3 0 1 7 . 2 1
4 0 1 3 . 2 6
5 0 1 0 . 8 0
6 0 9 . 0 6
7 0 8 . 0 8
8 0 7 . 2 2
9 0 6 . 7 8
1 0 0 6 . 4 3
1 1 0 6 . 1 5
1 2 0 5 . 9 6
1 3 0 5 . 8 0
1 4 0 5 . 6 8
1 5 0 5 . 5 7
1 6 0 5 . 5 2
1 7 0 5 . 4 2
1 8 0 5 . 3 4
1 9 0 5 . 3 0
2 0 0 5 . 2 4
2 1 0 5 . 2 1
m%bb&Sumh~Oa.& 4 . 5 8 n?u
P,naw5u
(db)
1 4 . 7 1 1 .oooo
7 . 1 0 0 . 4 8 0 4
4 . 1 8 0 . 2 8 0 5
2 . 7 6 0 . 1 8 3 2
1 . 8 9 0 . 1 2 4 3
1 . 3 6 0 . 0 8 7 5
0 . 9 8 0 . 0 6 1 6
0 . 7 6 0 . 0 4 6 9
0 . 5 8 0 . 0 3 4 1
0 . 4 8 0 . 0 2 7 5
0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 2 3
0 . 3 4 0 . 0 1 8 1
0 . 3 0 0 . 0 1 5 3
0 . 2 7 0 . 0 1 2 9
0 . 2 4 0 . 0 1 1 1
0 . 2 2 0 . 0 0 9 5
0 . 2 0 0 . 0 0 8 7
0 . 1 8 0 . 0 0 7 2
0 . 1 6 0 . 0 0 6 0
0 . 1 6 0 . 0 0 5 5
0 . 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 6
0 . 1 4 0.004 1
![Page 92: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
7 5
b2fll
(u14)
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
1 1 0
1 2 0
1 3 0
1 4 0
1 5 0
1 6 0
1 7 0
1 8 0
1 9 0
7 1 . 2 4 1 3 . 5 4 1 .oooo
4 1 . 7 6 7 . 5 2 0 . 5 5 3 8
2 7 . 1 7 4 . 5 5 0 . 3 3 3 0
2 0 . 0 1 3 . 0 8 0 . 2 2 4 6
1 5 . 8 7 2 . 2 4 0 . 1 6 1 9
1 2 . 7 7 1 . 6 1 0 . 1 1 5 0
1 0 . 6 1 1 . 1 6 0 . 0 8 2 3
9 . 1 2 0 . 8 6 0 . 0 5 9 8
8 . 0 5 0 . 6 4 0 . 0 4 3 6
7 . 3 2 0 . 4 9 0 . 0 3 2 5
6 . 8 2 0 . 3 9 0 . 0 2 5 0
6 . 5 1 0 . 3 3 0 . 0 2 0 3
6 . 2 5 0 . 2 7 0 . 0 1 6 3
6 . 0 3 0 . 2 3 0.0 1 30
5 . 9 2 0 . 2 1 0 . 0 1 1 3
5 . 8 3 0 . 1 9 0 . 0 1 0 0
5 . 7 6 0 . 1 7 0 . 0 0 8 9
5 . 6 9 0 . 1 6 0 . 0 0 7 9
5 . 6 4 0 . 1 5 0.007 1
5 . 6 0 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 0 6 5
![Page 93: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
76
LTIAI
(Ulfl) (r-Ku)
0 71.85 14.03
10 30.23 5.32
20 18.29 2.83
30 13.11 1.74
40 10.27 1.15
50 8.30 0.74
60 7.10 0.48
70 6.40 0.34
80 5.98 0.25
90 5.72 0.20
100 5.59 0.17
110 5.46 0.14
120 5.39 0.13
130 5.36 0.12
140 5.34 0.12
150 5.31 0.1 1
160 5.30 0.1 1
170 5.29 0.1 1
180 5.34 0.12
m.h=&m.&kviaa.J&J 4.78 f& nalaJLiaiNJiou 0.5 RJGl%/^aUlw"
1 .oooo
0.3769
0.1982
0.1207
0.0782
0.0487
0.0307
0.0202
0.0 140
0.0101
0.0081
0.0062
0.005 1
0.0047
0.0044
0.0039
0.0038
0.0036
0.0044
![Page 94: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
77
(db)
baai
(palwd) (n%)
0 72.06 14.66
10 29.74 5.46
20 17.95 2.90
30 12.82 1.78
40 9.86 1.14
50 8.08 0.75
60 6.93 0.50
70 6.24 0.35
80 5.79 0.25
90 5.49 0.19
100 5.35 0.1 6
110 5.23 0.13
120 5.19 0.12
130 5.1 6 0.12
140 5.1 6 0.12
150 5.13 0.1 1
160 5.1 1 0.1 1
170 5.1 1 0.1 1
180 5.1 1 0.1 1
190 5.07 0.10
lpspa"nbb&rum&uP4Ou& 4.60 n%J mai~biaa.aim 0.8 ~JGITI%~~~~~
1 .oooo
0.3702
0.1948
0.1 184
0.0744
0.0479
0.0308
0.0205
0.0138
0.0094
0.0073
0.0055
0.0049
0.0045
0.0045
0.0040
0.0037
0.0037
0.0037
0.003 1
qsra99s?0nska~7-lben~lnl~~~~"~~~ladu 25.98 OC
+-m&GuK~iaa&t4m~u 13.92 % nala.&muqa 0.0557 db
Exponential Model r2 = 0.72, Page's Model r2 = 0.97
![Page 95: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
78
L-J31
(tei) (n-G)
0 72.95 14.62
10 35.95 6.69
20 22.12 3.73
30 14.81 2.17
40 10.66 1.28
50 8.35 0.78
60 7.01 0.50
70 6.16 0.31
80 5.72 0.22
90 5.51 0.17
100 5.41 0.15
110 5.29 0.13
120 5.21 0.1 1
130 5.18 0.10
140 5.17 0.10
150 5.15 0.10
160 5.15 0.10
170 5.14 0.10
180 5.14 0.10
190 5.15 0.10
v~nab94"suos&&~tm& 4.67 nyaJ K-JlaJLiaa~~a~ 0.2 baJFl%/%nfi
1 .oooo
0.4564
0.2532
0.1458
0.0848
0.0509
0.0312
0.0187
0.0122
0.009 1
0.0077
0.0059
0.0047
0.0043
0.0041
0.0038
0.0038
0.0037
0.0037
0.0038
![Page 96: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
79
Lam
(usi)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
71.24 11.41 1 .oooo
27.42 3.77 0.3284
18.1 1 2.15 0.1857
12.88 1.24 0.1056
9.56 0.66 0.0547
8.26 0.43 0.0348
7.44 0.29 0.0222
7.00 0.21 0.0154
6.77 0.17 0.01 19
6.56 0.14 0.0087
6.43 0.12 0.0067
6.36 0.10 0.0056
6.32 0.10 0.0050
6.34 0.10 0.0053
6.33 0.10 0.0052
6.29 0.09 0.0046
6.29 0.09 0.0046
6.23 0.08 0.0036
6.29 0.09 0.0046
-iziG-w
![Page 97: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
80
7iEzL-W)
b-2~1
(Ul~) (nh)
0 72.14 15.62
10 26.66 5.14
20 15.27 2.51
30 10.32 1.37
40 7.67 0.76
50 6.18 0.42
60 5.41 0.24
70 4.99 0.14
80 4.87 0.12
90 4.88 0.12
100 4.82 0.1 1
110 4.79 0.10
120 4.80 0.10
130 4.80 0.10
140 4.81 0.10
150 4.81 0.10
160 4.81 0.10
170 4.81 0.10
180 4.81 0.10
mh~hwmh4oaG~ 4.34 7% w-m~~hw%u 0.8 n~'~s/%r~fi
1 .oooo
0.3273
0.1588
0.0856
0.0464
0.0244
0.0 130
0.0068
0.0050
0.005 1
0.0042
0.0038
0.0039
0.0039
0.0039
0.0039
0.0039
0.0039
0.0039
![Page 98: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
81
L-Jfll
(I&)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
70.73 17.66 1 .oooo
26.61 6.02 0.3397
12.85 2.39 0.1338
7.59 1 .oo 0.0550
5.33 0.40 0.02 12
4.54 0.19 0.0094
4.26 0.12 0.0052
4.16 0.09 0.0037
4.1 8 0.10 0.0040
4.1 6 0.09 0.0037
4.12 0.08 0.003 1
4.1 1 0.08 0.0030
4.13 0.08 0.0033
4.13 0.08 0.0033
--iGzr(db)
![Page 99: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
8 2
L--JiTl
(Wlf?)
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
1 1 0
1 2 0
1 3 0
7 0 . 4 5 15.81 1 .oooo
2 0 . 4 9 3 . 8 9 0 . 2 4 4 4
1 0 . 2 6 1 . 4 4 0 . 0 8 9 7
6 . 2 8 0 . 4 9 0 . 0 2 9 5
4 . 9 8 0 . 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 9
4 . 6 9 0.1 1 0 . 0 0 5 5
4 . 5 9 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 4 0
4 . 5 9 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 4 0
4 . 6 5 0 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 4 9
4 . 5 8 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 3 8
4 . 5 7 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 3 7
4 . 6 2 0 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 4 4
4 . 5 7 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 3 7
4 . 5 9 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 4 0
--iKzFw
![Page 100: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
a3
b--JEil
(l.blfi)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
70.91 16.37 1 .oooo
19.53 3.78 0.2296
9.49 1.32 0.0791
5.98 0.46 0.0265
4.88 0.19 0.0 100
4.55 0.1 1 0.005 1
4.50 0.10 0.0043
4.48 0.09 0.0040
4.49 0.10 0.0042
4.52 0.10 0.0046
4.48 0.09 0.0040
4.50 0.10 0.0043
--iGiG-w
![Page 101: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
![Page 102: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
L-JWI
(d)
0
2 0
6 0
9 0
1 0 0
1 2 0
1 4 0
1 6 0
1 8 0
2 0 0
2 2 0
2 4 0
(cm)/(% wb)
l/94.63 5/94.63 g/94.63
l/56.1 2 3/72.18 5/79.97 6.05/85.02 7 0 . 8 3 6.1 3 2 8 . 3
2 . 8 0 1 4 . 0 0 . 0 2 9
l/20.01 3/23.50 4.25/44.99 4 2 . 0 5 4 . 5
4 . 5
4 . 5
2 3 8 . 3
‘l/8.31 3/l 0.25 4.25/l 1 .I 8 1 2 . 4 0
l/8.01 3/8.65 4.2518.65 7 . 5 4
--iii&-K&&l
(% wb)
9 4 . 6 3
2 . 9 3 1 4 . 0 0 . 0 3 0
2 . 9 3 1 4 . 0 0 . 0 2 4
2 . 8 3 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 2 0
2 . 8 3 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 2 4
2 . 7 0 8 . 0 0 . 0 2 4
2 . 8 0 7 . 0 0 . 0 2 3
(Ib/in2) (kg/s)
3 2 8 . 3
3 2 3 . 4
c
![Page 103: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
a 6
![Page 104: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
2 Y 'yL2i31 ~a7%1~5~7n~iuiii9n~~~/~~l~~~ KllWLlU Fl-llUJqCJsJ nsx~Y&h FrmGhra ~J%~imyboth fv-m&uau
KAJ Yoil53Ju
(u14) (cm)/(% wb) (% wb) (cm) (Amp.) (Ib/in2) (kg/s) (N/m2)
0 l/95.1 1 5195.1 1 9195.1 1 9 5 . 1 1 1 0 . 0 3 6 7 . 5
2 0 2 . 9 6 2 8 . 0 0 . 0 5 2
4 0 2 . 9 0 2 6 . 5 0 . 0 5 3
5 0 2 . 7 6 2 2 . 5 0 . 0 4 9
6 0 l/40.03 3 1 5 9 . 0 7 5 1 6 8 . 9 8 5 8 . 0 5 6 . 0 3 5 7 . 7
7 0 2 . 5 3 18.5 0 . 0 4 7
1 0 0 2 . 7 6 2 2 . 5 0 . 0 5 0
1 2 0 1 /I 0.07 3/23.03 4.5/32.98 2 2 . 9 0 5.0 2 4 7 . 9
1 5 0 2 . 7 3 2 5 . 0 0 . 0 4 4
1 8 0 l/8.30 3/l 0 . 4 0 4.5110.94 9 . 5 0 4 . 8 3 4 3 . 0
1 9 0 2 . 6 0 17.5 0 . 0 4 6
2 3 0 2 . 4 0 21 .o 0 . 0 4 8
2 4 0 l/8.00 3/l 0 . 4 6 4.4110.46 9 . 4 4 4 . 8 3 4 3 . 0. .
nalu&bml 3 9 1 v
![Page 105: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
L-JiV
(Ulfi)
0
20
30
50
60
70
90
110
120
140
160
180
190
210
240
‘I /94.89 5/94.89 g/94.89
l/83.05 3/91.45 5/94.07 6.9/94.07
l/56.07 3/71.98 5/80.00 6.05/84.98
1 /lg.97 3/23.50 4.25/45.00
l/8.30 3/l 0.25 4.25/l 1 .I 8
l/8.00 3/8.65 4.25/8.65
iG%LLa&l
(% wb)
94.89
(Amp.) (Ib/in2) (kg/s)10.0 352.8
2.83 0.023
91.11 7.8
2.90
13.0
13.5
13.5
12.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
9.0
11.0
0.030
76.26 6.1
347.9
343.0
2.73
2.83
2.86
0.030
0.030
0.030
30.43 4.5 333.2
2.66
2.83
0.028
0.028
9.50 4.5 333.2
2.80
2.80
0.025
0.030
8.36 4.5 333.2
![Page 106: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
1
b2i31
(wfi)
0
2 0
3 0
5 0
7 0
9 0
1 1 0
1 4 0
1 6 0
1 8 0
2 1 0
2 4 0
(cm)/(% wb)
l/94.62 5/94.62 g/94.62
l/61.97 3/83.01 5/83.01 7/83.01
1 /I 9.07 3/36.97 4.5/36.97 3 1 . 0 7 5 . 0 2 4 3 . 0
l/8.32 3/l 0.07 4.5/l 3.84
l/8.00 3/9.65 4.519.63
iGx4m&l
(% wb)
9 4 . 6 2 1 0 . 0 3 6 7 . 5
2 . 9 6 3 5 . 0 0 . 0 5 3
8 0 . 8 4 8 . 0 3 5 7 . 7
1 0 . 0 0
8 . 9 8
5.0
5 . 0
2 . 8 0 3 2 . 5 0 . 0 4 9
2 . 6 0 3 6 . 0 0 . 0 5 4
2 . 5 0
2 . 5 3
2 . 8 0
4 . 0
4 . 0
3 . 0
3 . 0
0 . 0 1 5
0 . 0 1 6
0 . 0 1 7
2 . 6 0 0 . 0 1 7
(b/in2) (kg/s)
3 4 3 . 0
3 4 3 . 0
![Page 107: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
90
![Page 108: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
2%d ‘y
b-JAI ~ai81~58in~ilPaii9n~~~/~~l~~~ WJldl4 R-d13Jtp%J nxkabJ?h naiaJ$u~no ¶h.Jl~~Otil tT-na.J~usaaJ
La& %cwmJsJ
@I$ (cm)/(% wb) (% wb) (cm) (Amp.) (lb/in*) (kg/s) ( N / m * )
0 l/95.06 5/95.06 g/95.06 9 5 . 0 6 1 0 . 0 3 6 2 . 6
2 0 2 . 8 6 2 5 . 0 0 . 0 6 2
3 0 l/82.97 3/93.03 5/94.00 7.5/94.00 9 2 . 4 5 9 . 0 3 5 7 . 7
4 0 2 . 8 0 1 8 . 0 0 . 0 5 3
5 0 3 . 0 3 1 6 . 0 0 . 0 4 9
6 0 l/82.00 3/90.03 5/90.03 6.7190.03 8 5 . 3 2 7 . 4 3 5 2 . 8
8 0 2 . 7 3 1 7 . 0 0 . 0 5 1
9 0 l/20.50 3/67.00 4.25/67.00 5 3 . 3 9 4 . 5 3 4 3 . 0
1 1 0 2 . 8 0 3.0 0 . 0 1 4
1 5 0 l/7.29 3/l 2.00 4.25/l 6.43 1 0 . 5 0 4.5 2 3 3 . 2
1 6 0 2 . 9 0 3 . 0 0 . 0 1 7
2 0 0 2 . 7 0 3 . 0 0 . 0 1 7
2 4 0 l/6.00 3/7.42 4.2517.42 6 . 7 9 4 . 5 3 3 3 . 2
![Page 109: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
92
![Page 110: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
P, ‘y ‘y
L-JLV ~aiugsein~ii?u~i9n=~~/~~i~~~ Fr-mJ% nala.Jg~'au n9tbbabGh mia.Ghmo d~a.l1~~0~1 KW.lKU~~~
l.a&l YOSTdJEI
(lnfi) (cm)/(% wb) (% wb) (cm) (Amp.) (lb/in*) (kg/s) (N/m*)
0 94.09 10.0 362.6
20 2.43 25.0 0.055
30 67.54 7.5 357.7
40 2.20 26.0 0.050
50 2.20 25.0 0.050
60 42.37 5.7 352.8
80 2.40 22.5 0.045
90 27.1 1 11.0 343.0
130 2.33 24.0 0.047
150 8.50 11.0 233.2
160 2.30 10.0 0.035
170 6.92 11.0 333.2. .
![Page 111: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
1
x x ‘yb--JAI ~aiU~~o7n~iPbdiJnOEI"/nalU"IIU Fl-2lX.J"IIlA Fl-JlaJ~T-JXJ nxk~M?i mia.G.mo d%mdaG7 wm.Gh~au
d&l "UOSS~EIEI
(wf!) (cm)/(% wb) (% wb) (cm) (Amp. > (Ib/in2) (kg/s) (N/m2)
0 94.28 10.0 368.8
10 2.83 13.0 0.023
20 2.83 13.0 0.023
30 79.01 9.5 359.9
40 2.90 13.5 0.030
50 2.90 13.5 0.030
60 58.85 7.0 343.0
70 2.73 13.5 0.030
90 43.03 13.0 333.2
100 2.66 11.0 0.028
140 2.83 11.0 0.028
150 9.50 13.0 333.2
170 2.80 9.0 0.025
180 7.19 13.0 333.2
![Page 112: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
c
![Page 113: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
96
100
t
x ambient air temp. + ambient re la t ive humidi ty
I
100
s bed- inlet a i r temp. 8 bed- in le t re la t ive humidi ty
80
20 20
0 1 I I / / I I I
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Time (min)
Fig. l-1 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.1
100
t
* ambient air temp. + ambient re la t ive humidi ty
t
100+ bed- inlet a i r temp. 8 bed- in le t re la t ive humidi ty
80
P- 60
E-F 40
c3
80
60 Icc8
40
20 20
0 I I 1 I I I , I I ( 00 30 60 90 120 150 180 210
Time (min)
Fig. 1-2 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air. test no.2
![Page 114: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
97
100# ambient air temp. + ambient re lat ive humidi ty
100+ bed- inlet a i r temp. -s bed- in le t re la t ive humidi ty
80 80
P- 60 60 Ia8
40
20 20
0 00 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Time (min)
Fig, l-3 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.3
100* ambient air temp. + ambient re la t ive humidi ty
+ bed- inlet a i r temp. +-bed- in le t re la t ive humidi ty
100
80
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Time (min)
Fig. l-4 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.4
![Page 115: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
98
100
t
* ambient air temp. + ambient re lat ive humidi ty 100+ bed- inlet a i r temp. -E- bed- in le t re la t ive humidi ty
80 80
3v 60 60 Icc8
40
I I20 20
0 00 30 60 90 120 150 180 210
Time (min)
Fig. 1-5 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.5
I100
t
x ambient air temp. + ambient re lat ive humidi ty 100m bed- inlet a i r temp. -a- bed- in le t re la t ive humidi ty
t
80 - -80
20 20
I I I I/ I0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Time (min)
Fig. l-6 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.6
![Page 116: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
99
* ambient a i r temp. + ambient re lat ive humidi ty100 100
x bet - in le t a i r temp. -+ bed- in let re lat ive humidi ty
80 80
oo^- 60 60 I
ii-[r8
F 40 40
20 20
I I / I I I/ I0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210
Time (min)
Fig. 1-7 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.7
100t
xambient air temp. + ambient re lat ive humidi ty
t
100$j( bed- in le t a i r temp. -R-bed- in le t re lat ive humidity
t8080 80
oo-̂ 60 60 2F 8
F 40 40
20 20
I I I / I II I 1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time (min)
Fig.l-8 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.8
![Page 117: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
100
100
t
* a m b i e n t a i r t e m p . + ambient re lat ive humidi ty
t
100m bet- in let a i r temp. -s- bed- in le t re la t ive humidi ty
“: 6 0 - - --60 Icc8
0 00 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min)
Fig. l-9 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.9
Jc ambient air temp. + ambient re la t ive humidi ty
100 bed- inlet a i r temp. + bed- in le t re la t ive humidi ty 100
80
-40
20 20
0 00 20 40 60 80 100 120 140, 160 180
Time (min)
Fig. l-10 Evolution of temperature and relative humidity ofambient air and bed-inlet air, test no.10
![Page 118: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
![Page 119: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
102
(w-d) * 100
![Page 120: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
![Page 121: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
104
d.5il.L
![Page 122: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
![Page 123: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
106
SIMULATION FLOW CHART
humldltycontrol
Inputweather
parameters
\, contlneousventllatlon
\I
heat untilR H = x,
\III RH < x2
\/
\ GOSUBmoist air properties
GOSUBdry matter
IOSS
/ I
II not
print p o w e r requwmentpressure drope n e r g y consumption
e t c
,I If dry matter loss 3 x3 % oraverage moisture content<xq%wb
11 computing dryingt ime >, set total
Fig.3-1 Flow Chart of Soponronnarit Model[l2]
![Page 124: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
![Page 125: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
108
DECLARE SUB VTIDM ()
DECLARE SUB adjust (code, pointer%, pmin, pmax)
DECLARE SUB display (pointer%, pmin, pmax, sp%, ep%, yl %, st$())
DECLARE SUB about ()
DECLARE SUB presskey ()
DECLARE SUB initial ()
DECLARE SUB printmenu ()
DECLARE SUB SIMULATE ()
DECLARE SUB writeresults ()
DECLARE SUB printresults ()
DECLARE SUB displayresult ()
DECLARE SUB outputdata ()
DECLARE SUB calmean ()
DECLARE SUB Cinp (TTT, RRR, bed)
DECLARE SUB layer ()
DECLARE SUB drymatter ()
DECLARE SUB dryrate ()
DECLARE FUNCTION MequiX (TEQI, REQ!)
DECLARE SUB condense (TBI, WB!)
DECLARE FUNCTION BT# ()
D E C L A R E F U N C T I O N CGRAIN~ (MM! )
DECLARE FUNCTION vvx (MM!)
D E C L A R E F U N C T I O N Pvs# (TTI)
DECLARE FUNCTION RHu# (TTI, WWI)
DECLARE SUB clearline (sp%, ep%, py%, TXT5, foreground%, background%)
DECLARE SUB displaytext (sp%, ep%, dp%, py%, disp5, TXT5, foreground%, background%)
DECLARE SUB windw (x2%, yl%, x2%, y2%, foreground%, background%, shadow)
DECLARE SUB checkerr (x2%, yl%, miss)
DECLARE SUB checkscreen ()
DECLARE SUB setconstant ()
DECLARE SUB menu ()
DECLARE SUB clrscr (x2%, yl%, x2%, y2%, foreground%, background%, disp5)
DECLARE SUB selectgrain ()
DECLARE SUB selecttype ()
DECLARE SUB subprint ()
DECLARE SUB drystrat ()
DECLARE SUB respirate ()
DECLARE SUB howresultshow ()
DECLARE SUB inletair (state%)
DECLARE SUB bedstate ()
DECLARE SUB inlet ()
DECLARE SUB MAINPROG ()
DECLARE SUB style1 ()
DECLARE SUB style2 ()
DECLARE SUB style3 ()
DECLARE SUB Vinp (vcheck)
DECLARE FUNCTION GetNumX (Row%, Cal%, maxlen%, minvall, maxvall)
DECLARE FUNCTION gettext (x2%, yl%, maxlen)
![Page 126: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
109
‘global variable
DIM SHARED head.fore%, head.back%, dispdore%, disp.back%, box.fore%, box.back%
DIM SHARED choice.fore%, choice.back%, inp.fore%, inp.back%, fore.back%, back.back%
DIM SHARED gt$(5), dt$(4), dstrat5(3), reseff5(2), msg5(5)
DIM SHARED gselect%, tselect%, strat%, IFHEAT%, hrs%
DIM SHARED main$( 1 TO 8)
DIM SHARED WEATH5, GRAIN5, RES5, wdrive5, gdrive$, rdrive$, Rshow5
DIM SHARED TG(0 TO 1, 0 TO 500), MG(0 TO 1, 0 TO 500)
DIM SHARED JIDM(0 TO 500), IIDM(0 TO 500), DML(0 TO 500), WDM(0 TO 500)
DIM SHARED TRM(0 TO 500), X(0 TO 500), TRTG(0 TO 500), TRWO(0 TO 500)
DIM SHARED writefile
DIM SHARED AMCI, AGOI, AMC, AGO, cc, CO, CPW, CN
DIM SHARED DX, DIA, dt, dt2, dryt, DY, DDML
DIM SHARED EF, EH, FT, GV, GA, HI, HOUR
DIM SHARED II, ina, ind, INW%, ING%, chklp%, choose%
DIM SHARED J, JIDM, LENG, MG, MF, Meq, N, NH, NOL, PG, PB, PEtotal, PACDML
DIM SHARED Ql, Q2, Q4, Q5, Q6, R, RA, REQ, RF, SF, SMC, SGO
DIM SHARED tfp, TA, TG, TH, TNOL. TF, TIM, TIDM, TEQ, TO, T4, TJM, TJDM, tend, TREAD, tprint, tVTlDM
DIM SHARED U4, U8, US, U6, hfp, VOL, VEL, WO, WF, WID, xx, YN, errcheck, Rshow
‘global constant
CONST false = 0, true = 1
CONST CA = 1.009, CV = 1.88, DA = 1 .l’Air property
CONST A = .001889, C = .7101, D = .0274, E = 31.63
‘Initial value
msg5(1) = ’ -select Enter -Change option F6 -Start simulation FIO -QUIT’
msg5(2) = CHR5(24) + ’ ’ + CHR5(25) + ‘-change Enter-select’
msg$(3) = CHR5(24) + ” + CHR5(25) + ’ -select data Enter -change FlO -continue”
main$(l) = ‘Paddy ‘: main$(2) = ‘C”: main5(3) = ‘MISSCELLANEOUS DATA”
main5(4) = “C’: main5(5) = “DEEP ‘: main5(6) = ‘I’
main$(7) = ” D “: main5(8) = “C”
writefile = 0
‘BEGIN
c h e c k s c r e e n
setconstant
m e n u
about
MAINPROG
COLOR 7, 0: CLS
PRINT “KMITT: Grain Drying Simulation”
SYSTEM
E N D
fileerr:
BEEP: errcheck = ERR
checkerr 28, 20, ERR
RESUME NEXT
SUB about
windw 19, 8, 60, 21, box.fore%, box.back%, true
![Page 127: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
110
COLOR choicelore%, choice.back%
LOCATE 9, 20: PRINT ’ GRAIN DRYING SIMULATION ’
LOCATE 10, 20: PRINT ” 9999999999999999999999999999999 .
LOCATE 11, 20: PRINT ” A TEMPERATURE EQUILIBRIUM MODEL ’
LOCATE 12, 20: PRINT ’ ( FOR PADDY ) ”
LOCATE 13, 20: PRINT ” Written and developed at ”
LOCATE 14, 20: PRINT ” King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology ”
LOCATE 15, 20: PRINT ’ Thonburi
LOCATE 16, 20: PRINT ’ by Dr. SSoponronnarit ’
LOCATE 17, 20: PRINT * and Mr. S.Chinsakolthanakorn,Aug 1986 ”
LOCATE 18, 20: PRINT ’ ( FOR VARIOUS GRAINS AND DRYER TYPES ) ”
LOCATE 19, 20: PRINT ’ by Dr. SSoponronnarit ”
LOCATE 20, 20: PRINT ” and Mr. A.Nathakaranakule ,Oct 1991 ’
displaytext 1, 80, 2, 25, ” “, “Press any key to start’, head.fore%, head.back%
presskey
clrscr 19, 8, 61, 22, dispdore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ ‘, ’ ” + CHR$(27) + CHR$(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR$(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
head.back%
E N D S U B
SUB adjust (code, pointer%, pmin, pmax)
IF code = 72 THEN
pointer% = pointer% - 1
IF pointer% < pmin THEN
pointer% = pmax
E N D I F
ELSE
pointer% = pointer% + 1
IF pointer% > pmax THEN
pointer% = pmin
E N D I F
E N D I F
E N D S U B
SUB bedstate
IF tselectk 0 1 THEN
ING% = 1: main5(8) = “C”
ELSE
inletair ING%
SELECT CASE ING%
CASE 1: main$(8) = “C’
CASE 2: main5(8) = ‘V’
END SELECT
E N D I F
SELECT CASE ING%
CASE 1: Cinp TG, MG, true: MG = MG / 100
CASE 2: Vinp 2
END SELECT
IF ERR o 0 THEN
![Page 128: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
111
ING% = 1: main$(8) = “C’
E N D I F
clrscr 27, 10, 55, 16, dispdore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
E N D S U B
FUNCTION BTX
‘temp rised by fan
SELECT CASE gselect%
CASE 1: SF = 1.5: Ql = 36.7787: Q2 = 1 .1699
PG = SF * HI * Ql * (GV * HI) A Q2
CASE 2: SF = 1.5: Ql = 173.33: Q2 = 3200
PG = SF * ((Ql + Q2 * ((GV / 60) * HI)) * HI)
CASE 3: SF = 2.6: Ql = 1517.244873#: 02 = .a00238
PG = SF * Ql * (GV * HI / 60) A Q2
CASE 4, 5: SF = 272.6554
PG = SF * (GV * AMC) n .034378
END SELECT
IF gselect% = 4 OR gselect% = 5 THEN
PB = (GV * TIDM ’ PG) / (60 * Q4) / 1000
GA = (HI * GV * DA * 60 * TIDM) / VOL
ELSE
IF tselect% = 2 THEN
PB=(GV*WID*HI*LENG*PG)/(60*Q4)/1000
ELSE
PB=(GV*VOL*PG)/(60’Q4)/1000
E N D I F
GA = HI * GV * DA * 60
E N D I F
IF dryt = 0 THEN
PBtotal = PB
ELSE
IF GV = GV THEN
PB = PB
ELSE
PBl =PB*dt2
dt2 = 0
E N D I F
PBtotal = (PBl + PB * dt2) / dryt
E N D I F
IF tselect% = 2 THEN
BTX = PB / (WID * HI * LENG * GA / HI / 3600) / (CA + WO * CV)
ELSE
BTX = PB / (VOL * GA / HI / 3600) / (CA + WO * CV)
E N D I F
E N D F U N C T I O N
SUB calmean
AMC = SMC / TNOL: AMC = INT((AMC / (1 + AMC)) * 10000 + .5) / 100
AGO = SGO / TNOL: AGO = INT(AG0 * 100 + S) / 100:
![Page 129: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
112
PACDML = (100 - TJDM / TIDM * 100): PACDML = INT(PACDML * 10000 + 5) / 10000
xx = INT(xx * 10000 + .5) / 10000
TJM = INT(((100 * TJDM) / (100 - AMC)) * 100 + .5) / 100
TIM = INT(((100 * TIDM) / (100 - AMCI)) * 100 + .5) / 100
IF &elect% = 2 THEN
TIM = TIM * TNOL: TJM = TJM * TNOL
E N D I F
E N D S U B
FUNCTION CGRAINX (MM)
‘SPECIFIC HEAT OF GRAIN 1
SELECT CASE gselectk
CASE 1 : CGRAIN# = 1.269 + 3.488 * MM / (1 + MM) ‘paddy
CASE 2: CGRAINX = 1.565 + 2.8 * MM 1 (1 + MM) ‘corn
CASE 3: CGRAINX = 1 .I 54795 + .02691 8 * MM ‘soybean
CASE 4. 5: CGRAINX = 1 .I 03961 + .0305244# * MM / (1 + MM) ‘spring onion
END SELECT
E N D F U N C T I O N
SUB checkerr (x2%. yl%, miss)
SELECT CASE miss
CASE 24: er5 = “Device time out”
CASE 25: er5 = “Device fault”
CASE 27: er5 = ‘Out of paper’
CASE 5 1 : er5 = ‘Internal error’
CASE 52: er5 = ‘Bad file name or number’
CASE 53: er$ = ‘File not found’
CASE 54: er5 = “Bad file mode’
CASE 55: er$ = “File already open”
CASE 57: er5 = ‘Device I/O error”
CASE 58: er$ = “File already exist’
CASE 61 : er5 = “Disk full”
CASE 62: er5 = “Input past end of file”
CASE 64: er$ = ‘Bad file name’
CASE 67: er$ = ‘Too many files’
CASE 68: er$ = ‘Device unavailable’
CASE 70: er$ = “Permission denied”
CASE 71 : er$ = ‘Disk not ready’
CASE 72: er$ = ‘Disk-media error’
CASE 75: er$ = “Path/File access error’
CASE 76: er5 = ‘Path not found”
END SELECT
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ “, er5 + ” : Press a key”, head.fore%, head.back%
presskey
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” ‘, ” ” + CHR$(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR$(26) + CHR$(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
h e a d . b a c k %
E N D S U B
SUB checkscreen
![Page 130: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
113
DEF SEG = 0: currentmode = PEEK(&H449)
IF currentmode o 7 THEN
head.fore% = 14: head.back% = 6: disp.fore% = 3: disp.back% = 1
box.fore% = 1 : box.back% = 7: choice.fore% = 14: choice.back% = 5
inp.fore% = 4: inp.back% = 9: fore.back% = 8: back.back% = 8
ELSE
head.fore% = 0: head.back% = 7: disp.fore% = 7: disp.back% = 0
box.fore% = 7: box.back% = 0: choice.fore% = 0: choice.back% = 7
inp.fore% = 0: inputback = 7: fore.back% = 7: back.back% = 0
E N D I F
K E Y O F F
FOR count% = 1 TO 10: KEY count%, ““: NEXT count%
CLS
END SUB
SUB Cinp (TTT, RRR, bed)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ ‘, msg5(3), headfore%, head.back%
clrscr 1 8, 18, 60, 21, disp.fore%, disp.back%, ” ’
windw 18, 18, 60, 21, box.fore%, box.back%, true
miny% = 19: maxy% = 20: mininp% = 1: maxinp% = 2
minx% = 20: ~1% = 19: x2% = 48
COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%
IF bed <> true THEN
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ’ Amblent temperature : dC”:yl%=yl%+l
ELSE
LOCATE ~196, minx%
PRINT “Initial grain temperature :
E N D I F
dC”: yl % = ~1% + 1
IF bed <a true THEN
LOCATE y 1 %, minx%
PRINT “Ambient relat ive humidity :
ELSE
% n
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Initial moisture content :
E N D I F
%wb”
IF RRR < 1 THEN RRR = RRR * 100
DIM dat( 1 TO 2)
dat(1) = TTT: dat(2) = RRR: ~1% = miny%: num% = mininp%
FOR num% = 1 TO maxinp%
LOCATE yl%, x2%: COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%
PRINT USING “#X#.##‘; dat(num%); : ~1% = ~1% + 1
NEXT num%
num% = 1: ~1% = 19
LOCATE yl%, x2%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%: PRINT USING “##X.Xx”; dat(num%)
done = false
WHILE done = false
in5 = INKEY
dis = LEN(in5)
![Page 131: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
114
SELECT CASE dis
CASE 1: GOSUS Cascii
CASE 2: GOSUS Cscan
END SELECT
W E N D
TTT = dat(1): RRR = dat(2)
clrscr 17. 18, 61, 22, disp.fore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” “, ” ” + CHR$(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR$(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
head.back%
GOT0 15
Cascii:
ascii = ASC(LEFT$(in$, 1))
IF ascii = 13 THEN
IF num% = 1 THEN
dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 5, -30, 100)
ELSE
dat(num%) = GetNumX(yl%, x2%, 5, 0, 100)
E N D I F
E N D I F
LOCATE yl%, x2%; COLOR choicedore%, choice.back%: PRINT USING “#X#.XX”; dat(num%)
R E T U R N
C s c a n :
scan = ASC(RIGHT$(in$, 1))
LOCATE yl%, x2%: COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%: PRINT USING ‘#X#.##“; dat(num%)
SELECT CASE scan
CASE 68: done = true
CASE 72: num% = num% - 1: ~1% = ~1% - 1
IF num% < mininp% THEN
num% = maxinp%: yl% = maxy%
E N D I F
CASE80:num%=num%+l:yl%=yl%+1
IF num% ) maxinp% THEN
num% = mininp%: yl% = miny%
E N D I F
END SELECT
LOCATE yl%, x2%: COLOR choice,fore%, choice.back%: PRINT USING “##X.##‘; dat(num%)
R E T U R N
15 END SUB
SUB clearline (sp%, ep%, py%, disp5, foreground%, background%)
tl = ep% - sp%: COLOR foreground%, background%: LOCATE py%, sp%, 0
FOR count% = 1 TO tl + 1: PRINT disp5; : NEXT count%
E N D S U B
SUB cfrscr (xl %, yl%, x2%, y2%, foreground%, background%, disp5)
COLOR foreground%, background%
FOR XCOUNT = xl % TO x2%
FOR YCOUNT = ~1% TO ~2%
LOCATE YCOUNT, XCOUNT, 0: PRINT disp5:
![Page 132: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
115
NEXT YCOUNT
NEXT XCOUNT
E N D S U B
SUB condense (TB, WB)
TF = 25: done = false
CZ = CA * TB + (2502.3 + CV * TB) * WB + R * CPW * TB
WHILE done = false
TT = TF + 273.16
WF = .62198 * PVS((TF)) / (101.325 - PVS((TF)))
Zl = CZ - GA * TF - WF * (2502.3 + CV * TF) - R * CPW * TF
DPVS = PVS((TF)) * (7511.52 / (TT n 2) + 2.399897E-02 - (2 * .000011654551#) * (TT) - (3 *
.000000012810336#)*(TT”2)+(4*2.0998405D-11)*(TT”3)-(12.150799#)/(TT))
DWF = .62198 * DPVS * 101.325 / (101.325 - PVS((TF))) “2
22 = -CA - 2502.3 * DWF - cv * (TF * DWF + WF) - R * cpwTN=TF-Zl /Z2
IF ABS(TN - TF) > ,001 THEN
TF = TN
ELSE
done = true
E N D I F
W E N D
TF = TN
WF = (CZ - CA * TF - R * CPW * TF) / (2502.3 + CV * TF)
MF = MF - (WF - WB) / R
E N D S U B
SUB display (pointer%, pmin, pmax, sp%, ep%, yl %, st$())
FOR count% = pmin TO pmax
foreground% = disp.fore%: background% = disp.back%
IF count% = pointer% THEN
foreground% = choicedore%: background% = choice.back%
E N D I F
displaytext sp%, ep%, 2, yl %, ’ ‘, st$(count%), foreground%, background%
Yl% = Yl% + 1
NEXT count%
E N D S U B
SUB displayresult
displaytext I, 80, 2, 25, * “, * Display results”, head.fore%, head.back%
x=0
FOR N = 1 TO TNOL
X = X + X(N): X(N) = X
NEXT N
COLOR disp.fore%, dlsp.back%
IF tselect% = 2 THEN
LOCATE 2, 7: PRINT USING ‘##.#X”; dryt * VEL
E N D I F
cc = 0
![Page 133: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
116
VIEW PRINT 7 TO 20
FOR N = U4TOTNOLSTEPU4
cc = cc + u4
PRINT USING ’ ##.X#X XXX.# X#.#X’; X(N); INT(TG(0, N) * 100 + .5) / 100; INT(MG(0, N) / (1 +
MG(0, N)) * 10000 + .5) / 100
NEXT N
IF cc o TNOL THEN
N = TNOL
PRINT USING ” #I#.### ##X.X ##.Xx’: X(N); INT(TG(0, N) * 100 + .5) / 100; INT(MG(0, N) / (1 +
MG(0, N)) * 10000 + .5) / 100
E N D I F
V I E W P R I N T
subprint
LOCATE 5, 66: PRINT USING ‘#####.##‘; dryt
LOCATE 6, 66: PRINT USING ‘###X#.##‘; AMCI
LOCATE 7, 66: PRINT USING “#R%%%.X#“; AGOI
LOCATE 8, 64: PRINT USING “#######.#X”; TIM
LOCATE 9, 66: PRINT USING “####X.X%‘; AMC
LOCATE 10, 66: PRINT USING “X####.##‘; AGO
LOCATE 11, 64: PRINT USING ‘###XXXX.X#‘; TJM
LOCATE 12, 66: PRINT USING “#X###.##“; PACDML
IF tselect% ) 2 THEN FT = HI / VEL
LOCATE 13, 66: PRINT USING ‘X#XX#.##‘: FT
LOCATE 14, 66: PRINT USING ‘####X.XX’; PBtotal / Q5
IF tselect% = 2 THEN VOL = WID * HI * LENG
LOCATE 15, 66: PRINT USING ‘#####.##‘; GA / HI * VOL / 3600 * CA * TH / 06
LOCATE 16, 66: PRINT USING ‘#####.##” GA / HI * VOL / 3600 * CA * T4 / Q6
LOCATE 17, 66: PRINT USING ‘###X#.X#“; EF * 3600 / 1000 / Q5
LOCATE 18, 66: PRINT USING ‘#X##X.XX”; EH / Q6
LOCATE 19, 66: PRINT USING “#X###.#X’; BTX
LOCATE 20, 66: PRINT USING “XXXX#.R%‘; TH
LOCATE 21, 66: PRINT USING ‘####X.X%‘; T4
LOCATE 22, 66: PRINT USING ‘#XXX#.X#” PG
IF Rshow = 1 THEN
displaytext 1, 80, 2, 25, ’ ‘, “Press any key”, head.fore%, head.back%
presskey
E N D I F
displaytext 1, 80, 2, 25, ” ‘, ‘Simulating’, head.fore%, head.back%
E N D S U B
SUB displaytext (sp%, ep%, dp%, py%. disp$, TXT$, foreground%, background%)
tl = ep% - sp%: clearline sp%. ep%, py%, disp$, foreground%, background%
SELECT CASE dp%
CASE 1: dp% = sp% ‘left
CASE 2: dp% = sp% + INT((tl - LEN(TXT$)) / 2) ‘center
CASE 3: dp% = spa + (tl - LEN(TXT5)) + 1 ‘right
END SELECT
LOCATE py%, dp%, 0: COLOR foreground%, background%: PRINT TXT5;
E N D S U B
![Page 134: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
117
SUB drymatter
SELECT CASE gselect%
CASE I : TG = (TG(O, J) + TG( I, J)) I 2: MG = (MG(O, J) + MG(I , J)) I 2
X = EXP(D * (TG * 1.8 - 28)) * EXP(E * (MG / (1 + MG) - .14))
IF II > 1 THEN
Y = TRM(J) /X
T=(Y/A)“(l /C)*lOOO
MM = ,103 * (EXP(455 / (MG(1, J) * 100) n 1.53) - 8.44999E-03 * 100 * MG(1, J) + 1.588)
T = T + d t
ELSE
T = dt
E N D I F
TRM(J)=A*(T/lOOO)“C*X
DDML = 1 - EXP(-TRM(J)) ‘paddy
CASE 2: DDML = 0 ‘corn
CASE 3: DDML = 0 ‘soybean
CASE 4, 5: DDML = 0 ‘spring onion
END SELECT
IF IFHEAT% o 1 THEN DDML = 0
JIDM(J) = JIDM - JIDM * DDML
DML(J) = IIDM(J) - JIDM(J)
IIDM(J) = JIDM(J)
TJDM = TJDM + JIDM(J)
E N D S U B
SUB dryrate
SELECT CASE gselect%
CASE 1: AA = .02958 - .44565 * REQ + .01215 * TEQ
BB=.13365+1.93653*REQ-1.77431 *REQ”2+9.468001E-03’TEQ
cc=-AA*BB*dt*dryt”(BB-1)
MF = (MG(O, J) - cc * Meq) / (1 - cc) ‘paddy
CASE 2: RO = DIA / 2: PI = 3.141592654X
DD = .I 432 * EXP(-4496.241 / (TEQ + 273.16))
PI = DD / RO A 2: P2 = PI n 2 * DD * dryt / RO n 2
DIF = -6 * PI * (EXP(-P2) + EXP(-4 * P2) + EXP(-9 * P2))
MF = MG(0, J) + (MG - Meq) * DIF * dt ‘corn
CASE 3: TABS = TEQ + 273.16: MO = MG * 100
PP = -480.4213 + 4.516 * TABS - .0141579 * TABS n 2 + 1.4807E-05 * TABS * 3
QQ = .I 3266 - .01228 * MO + .00144 * TABS + 6.9E-08 * MO * TABS A 2
DIF = -(PP * QQ) * dt * dryt n (QQ - 1)
MF = (MG(0, J) - DIF * Meq) / (1 - DIF) ‘soybean
CASE 4, 5: V = (GV * TIDM * HI / VOL) / 60
drytl = dryt * 60
dtl = dt * 60
NN=EXP(.014273-.01268*TEQ+.050006/V+.000053X*TEQA2)
KK=EXP(-4.67879+.073281 ‘TEQ-.19866/V-.00024*TEQ”2)
cc = -KK * NN * dtl * drytl n (NN - 1)
MF = (MG(0, J) - cc * Meq) / (1 - cc) ‘spring onion
![Page 135: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
118
END SELECT
E N D S U B
SUB drystrat
DIM strat$(Z)
IF tselect% <> 1 THEN
YN = 1: CN = 1: main5(2) = “C”
ELSE
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ “, msg$(2), head.fore%, head.back%
strat$(O) = “Continuous aeration”
strat$( 1 ) = “On-Off fan [select RH]”
strat5(2) = “Relative humidity control”
sp% = 25: ep% = 55
trmin = 0: trmax = 2: asciicode = 0: scancode = 0
clrscr 23, 9, 57, 16, dispdore%, disp.back%, ’ ’
windw 23, 9, 57, 16, box.fore%, box.back%, true
displaytext spa, ep%, 2, 10, ’ * , ‘GRAIN DRYING STRATEGIES”, disp,fore%, disp.back%
display (strat%), (trmin), (trmax), sp%, ep%, 12, strat$()
WHILE asciicode o 13
K$ = INKEY5: I = LEN(K$)
IF I = 2 THEN
scancode = ASC(RIGHT$(K$, 1))
IF (scancode = 72) OR (scancode = 80) THEN
adjust (scancode), strat%, (trmin), (trmax)
display (strat%), (trmin), (trmax). sp%, ep%, 12. strat$()
E N D I F
ELSE
IF I = 1 THEN
asciicode = ASC(LEFT$(K$, 1))
E N D I F
E N D I F
W E N D
SELECT CASE strat%
CASE 0: main5(2) = “C”: YN = 1: CN = 1
CASE 1: main5(2) = “0’: YN = 2
CASE 2: main5(2) = “R”: YN = 3
END SELECT
IF YN o 1 THEN
clrscr 26, 19, 55, 21, dispdore%, disp.back%, ’ ’
windw 26, 19, 55, 21, box.fore%, box.back%, true
COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%: LOCATE 20, 28
PRINT “Require RH setpoint : 46’
COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
RL = GetNum#(PO, 49, 4, 0, 100)
CN=RL/lOO
clrscr 26, 19, 56, 22, dispdore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
E N D I F
clrscr 23, 9, 58, 17, disp.fore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
![Page 136: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
119
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ “, ” ’ + CHR$(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
head.back%
E N D I F
E N D S U B
DEFINT A-Z
FUNCTION GetNum# (Row, Col, maxlen, minval!, maxval!)
DIM done
LOCATE 25, 1 : COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘Enter number - RANGE ###.##X to XX#.## and Enter”; minval!; maxval!;
Result5 = “”
done = false
WHILE INKEY <> “: WEND ‘Clear keyboard butler
DO WHILE done = false
IF LEN(Result5) > maxlen THEN
DO WHILE LEN(Result5) > maxlen
Result$ = LEFT$(Result$. LEN(Result$) - 1)
LOOP
E N D I F
LOCATE Row, Col: PRINT Result$; CHR5(95); SPACE$(maxlen - LEN(Result5));
Kbd$ = INKEY
SELECT CASE Kbd$
CASE “0’ TO “9”
Result5 = Result5 + Kbd5
CASE “.“, “-”
IF INSTR(Result5, “.‘) = 0 THEN
Result$ = Result$ + Kbd$
E N D I F
CASE CHR5( 13)
IF VAL(Result5) > maxvall OR VAL(Result5) < minvall THEN
Result5 = ”
ELSE
done = true
E N D I F
CASE CHR$( 8)
IF LEN(Result5) > 0 THEN
Result5 = LEFT$(Result$, LEN(Result5) - 1 )
E N D I F
CASE ELSE
IF LEN(Kbd5) > 0 THEN
BEEP
E N D I F
END SELECT
LOOP
LOCATE Row, Col
PRINT Result$;
GetNum# = VAL(Result5)
COLOR head.fore%, head.back%: LOCATE 25, 1
FOR MM% = 1 TO 60: PRINT” ‘; : NEXT MM%
![Page 137: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
120
LOCATE 25, 1: PRINT msg5(3);
E N D F U N C T I O N
DEFSNG A-Z
FUNCTION gettext$ (x2%, yl%, maxlen)
LOCATE yl C, x2%: F$ = “”
done = l&e
D O
I$ = INPUT$(l)
I = ASC(I5)
SELECT CASE I
CASE 46, 48 TO 56, 65 TO 90, 92, 97 TO 122
F$ = F5 + I5
CASE 13: done = true
CASE 6
IF F5 o ” THEN F5 = LEFT$(F$, LEN(F5) - 1)
CASE ELSE
BEEP
END SELECT
F5 = UCASE$(F$)
LOCATE yl%, x2%: FOR MM% = 1 TO maxlen: PRINT ” ‘; : NEXT MM%
LOCATE yl%, x2%: PRINT F5
LOOP UNTIL LEN(F$) = maxlen OR done = true
gettext = F5
E N D F U N C T I O N
SUB howresultshow
DIM hrs5(5), dp5(4), oldms%
done = false
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” “, msg5(3), headdore%, head.back%
hrs$(l) = Rshow5
dp$( 1 ) = “Display & Print’
dp5(2) = “Display & Save”
dp$(3) = “Display & Print & Save”
dp5(4) = “Display only’
GOSUB showchoice
spa/ = 28: ep% = 51
hrsmin = 1 : hrsmax = 5: asciicode = 0: scancode = 0
clrscr 26, 9, 53, 15, disp.fore%, disp.back%, ’ ’
windw 26, 9, 53, 15, box.fore%, box.back%, true
display (hrs%), (hrsmin), (hrsmax), sp%, ep%, IO, hrs5()
WHILE don = false
K5 = INKEY
I = LEN(K5)
SELECT CASE I
CASE 1: GOSUB chkascii
CASE 2:
GOSUB chkscan
END SELECT
![Page 138: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
121
W E N D
GOSUB adjdisp
clrscr 26, 9, 54. 16, disp.fore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ “, ’ ’ + CHR5(27) + CHRs(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), headdore%,
head.back%
GOT0 18
showchoice:
FOR cc% = 2 TO 5
IF cc% = hrs% THEN
oldms% = hrs%: hrs$(cc%) = dp$(cc% - 1) + ” + CHR$(2)
ELSE
hrs$(cc%) = dp$(cc% - 1)
E N D I F
NEXT cc%
R E T U R N
adjdisp:
IF Rshow = 1 THEN
SELECT CASE choose%
CASE 2: ina = 1: ind = 2: main$(7) = ’ D&P -I’
CASE 3: ina = 2: ind = 1: main$(7) = ’ D&S -I’: Vinp 3
IF errcheck <> 0 THEN
ina = 2: ind = 2: main$(7) = ’ D -I’: hrs% = 5: choose% = 5
GOSUB showchoice
E N D I F
CASE 4: ina = 1: ind = 1: main$(7) = “D&P&S -I’: Vinp 3
IF errcheck 0 0 THEN
ina = 1: ind = 2: main$(7) = ’ D&P -I”: hrs% = 2: choose% = 2
GOSUB showchoice
E N D I F
CASE 5: ina = 2: ind = 2: main$(7) = ” D -I’
END SELECT
ELSE
SELECT CASE choose%
CASE 2: ina = 1: ind = 2: main$(7) = ’ D&P -C’
CASE 3: ina = 2: ind = 1: main$(7) = ’ D&S -C’: Vinp 3
IF errcheck o 0 THEN
ina = 2: ind = 2: main$(7) = ” D -C’: hrs% = 5: choose% = 5
GOSUB showchoice
E N D I F
CASE 4: ina = 1: ind = 1: main$(7) = “D&P&S -C’: Vinp 3
IF errcheck o 0 THEN
ina = 1: ind = 2: main$(7) = ” D&P -C’: hrs% = 2: choose% = 2
GOSUB showchoice
E N D I F
CASE 5: ina = 2: ind = 2: main5(7) = ” D -C”
END SELECT
E N D I F
R E T U R N
chkascii:
![Page 139: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
122
ascti = ASC(LEFT$(K$, 1))
IF ascii = 13 THEN
SELECT CASE hrs%
CASE 1:
SELECT CASE Rshow
CASE 1: Rshow = 2: hrs$( 1) = ‘Continuous Results”: Rshow5 = hrs$( 1)
CASE 2: Rshow = 1 : hrs$(l) = ‘Intermittent Results”: Rshow$ = hrs$(l)
END SELECT
CASE2TO5:
choose% = hrs%
hrs$(oldms%) = dp$(oldms% - 1)
oldms% = hrs%
hrs$(oldms%) = dp$(oldms% - 1) + ” ” + CHR$(P)
END SELECT
GOSUB adjdisp
E N D I F
display (hrs%), (hrsmin), (hrsmax), sp%, ep%, 10, hrs$()
R E T U R N
chkscan:
scancode = ASC(RIGHT$(K$, 1))
SELECT CASE scancode
CASE 72, 80:
adjust (scancode), hrs%, (hrsmin), (hrsmax)
display (hrs%), (hrsmin), (hrsmax), sp%, ep%, 10, hrs%()
CASE 68: don = true
END SELECT
R E T U R N
18 END SUB
SUB initial
ON ERROR GOT0 fileerr
U2 = 0: FT = 0: EH = 0: T4 = 0
‘Cal number of grain layers
dryt = 0: TREAD = 0: tprint = hip / VEL
IFMG.lTHENMG=MG/lOO
IFRA>lTHENRA=RA/lOO
TNOL = HI / DX
IF ING% = 1 THEN
FOR I = 1 TO HI / DX
TG(0, I) = TG: MG(0, I) = (MG / (1 - MG))
NEXT I
ELSE
IF HI / DX / CO >= 1 THEN
MM = INT(HI / DX / CO): NN = (HI / DX) MOD CO
22 = MM * CO
FOR J = 1 TO ZZ STEP MM
INPUT #I, yl , y2: y2 = y2 / 100: y2 = y2 / (1 - y2)
IF errcheck o 0 THEN EXIT SUB
IC = -1
![Page 140: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
123
FORKK= 1 TOMM
IC = IC + 1
TG(0, J + IC) = yl: MG(0, J + IC) = y2
NEXT KK
NEXT J
IF NN <> 0 THEN
J = MM * CO: IC = 0
FOR KK = 1 TO NN
IC = IC + 1
TG(0, J + IC) = TG(0, J): MG(0, J + IC) = MG(0, J)
NEXT KK
E N D I F
ELSE
FORI = 1 TOCO
INPUT #l, TG(0, I), MG(0, I): MG(0, I) = MG(0, I) / 100
IF errcheck o 0 THEN EXIT SUB
MG(0, I) = MG(0, I) / (1 - MG(0, I))
NEXT I
J - O
FOR I = 1 TO HI / DX: SG = 0: SM = 0
FORII=HI/DX/COTO1STEPHI/DX/CO
J = J + 1: SM = SM + MG(0, J): SG = SG + TG(0, J)
NEXT II
TG(0, I) = SG * HI / DX / CO: MG(0, I) = SM * HI / DX / CO
NEXT I
E N D I F
C L O S E # 1
E N D I F
U6 = 0: SMC = 0: SGO = 0
FOR K = 1 TO HI / DX
X(K) = DX: WDM(K) = DX / VV((MG(0, K)))
U6 = U6 + VOL / HI * DX / VV((MG(0, K)))
SMC = SMC + MG(0, K)
SGO = SGO + TG(0, K)
NEXT K
AMCI = SMC I (HI I DX): AMCI = INT(AMCI / (AMCI + 1) * i 0000 + .5) I i 00
AGOI = SGO / (HI / DX): AGOI = INT(AGOI * 100 + .5) / 100
TIDM = U6
JIDM = TIDM / HI * DX
E N D S U B
SUB inlet
inletair INW%
SELECT CASE INW%
CASE 1 : main5(4) = “C”: Cinp TA, RA, false: RA = RA / 100
CASE 2: main5(4) = “V’: Vinp 1
END SELECT
IF ERR <> 0 THEN
INW% = 1: main$(4) = ‘C’
![Page 141: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
124
E N D I F
clrscr 27, 10, 55, 16, dispdore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
E N D S U B
SUB inletair (state%)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ ‘, msg5(2), head.fore%, head.back%
DIM inair$(2)
inair$( 1 ) = ‘Input constant variable’
inair5(2) = “input from file”
sp% = 29: ep% = 52
airmin = 1 : airmax = 2: asciicode = 0: scancode = 0
clrscr 27, 10, 54, 15, disp.iore%, disp.back%. ” ”
windw 27, IO, 54, 15, box.fore%, box.back%, true
display (state%), (airmin), (airmax), sp%, ep%, 12, inair$()
WHILE asciicode <> 13
K$ = INKEY
I = LEN(K$)
IF I = 2 THEN
scancode = ASC(RIGHT$(K$, 1))
IF (scancode = 72) OR (scancode = 80) THEN
adjust (scancode), state%, (airmin), (airmax)
display (state%), (airmin), (airmax), sp%, ep%, 12, inair$()
E N D I F
ELSE
IF I = 1 THEN
asciicode = ASC(LEFT$(K$. 1))
E N D I F
E N D I F
W E N D
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ ‘, ’ ’ + CHR5(27) + CHR$(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR$(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
h e a d . b a c k %
E N D S U B
SUB layer
FOR J = 1 TO NOL
IF tselect% o 1 OR (tselect% = 1 AND RO < CN) THEN
CPW = CGRAINX((MG(0, J))) ‘cal specific heat
R = WDM(J) / GA / dt
TEQ = ((CA + CV * WO) * TO + (CPW * R * TG(0, J))) / (CA + CV * WO + CPW * R)
REQ = RHu#((TEQ), (WO))
IF REQ > 1 THEN
TB = TEQ: WB = WO: MF = MG(0, J)
condense TB, WB
MG(0, J) = MF: TEQ = TF: WO = WF: REQ = ,999
ELSE
IF REQ ) ,999 THEN
REQ = ,999
E N D I F
E N D I F
![Page 142: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
125
Meq = Mequl#((TEQ), (REQ))
dryrate
WF = (MG(~, J) - MF) * R + wo
TF = ((CA + CV * WO) * TEQ - (WF - WO) * 2502.3 + CPW * R * TEQ) / (CA + CV * WF + R ’ CPW)
RF = RHu#((TF), (WF))
IF RF > 1 THEN
TB = TF: WB = WF
condense TB, WB
E N D I F
IF chklp% = 1 THEN
TRTG(J + 1) = TF: TRWO(J + 1) = WF
E N D I F
TG(1, J) = TF: MG(1, J) = MF
TO = TF: WO = WF
ELSE
TG( I, J) = TG(0, J): MG(1, J) = MG(0, J)
E N D I F
IF tselect% = 1 THEN
drymatter
IF IFHEAT% = 1 THEN
H20 = DML(J) * .6: MG(1, J) = MG( 1, J) + (H20 / JIDM(J))
CR = CGRAIN#((MG( 1, J)))
GR = DML(J) * 15778 / ((JIDM(J) * MG(l/ J) + JIDM(J)) * CR)
TG( 1, J) = TG( 1, J) + GR
E N D I F
X(J) = WDM(J) * VV((MG(1, J)))
ELSE
X(J) = DX: TJDM = TJDM + JIDM
E N D I F
TG(0, J) = TG(1, J): MG(0, J) = MG( 1, J)
SMC = SMC + MG( 1, J): SGO = SGO + TG( 1, J): xx = xx + X(J)
NEXT J
E N D S U B
SUB MAINPROG
DIM hor( 1 TO 4), vert( 1 TO 2), index
her(1) = 16: hor(2) = 44: hor(3) = 55: hor(4) = 77
vert( 1) = 3: vert(2) = 4
minhor = 1 : maxhor = 4: minvert = 1 : maxvert = 2
don = false
GOSUB displaychoice
shor = 1 : svert = 1 : index = 1 : COLOR choicedore%, choice.back%:
LOCATE vert(svert), hor(shor): PRINT main$(index)
WHILE don = false
K5 = INKEY$
I = LEN(K$)
SELECT CASE I
CASE 1 : GOSUB checkascii
CASE 2: GOSUB checkscan
![Page 143: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
126
END SELECT
IF tselect% o 1 THEN
IF index o 2 THEN
main$(2) = ‘C’: YN = 1: CN = 1
COLOR dispdore%, disp.back%: LOCATE vert( l), hor(2): PRINT main5(2)
E N D I F
IF index 0 6 THEN
main$(b) = “N”: IFHEAT% = 2
COLOR disp,fore%, disp.back%: LOCATE vert(2), hor(2): PRINT main5(6)
E N D I F
IF index 0 8 THEN
main$(8) = “C”: ING% = 1
COLOR disp,fore%, disp.back%: LOCATE vert(2), hor(4): PRINT main$(8)
E N D I F
E N D I F
COLOR choicelore%, choice.back%
: LOCATE vert(svert), hor(shor)
PRINT main$(index)
W E N D
GOT0 11
checkascii:
ascii = ASC(LEFT$(K$, 1))
IF ascii = 13 THEN
SELECT CASE index
CASE 1 : selectgrain
CASE 5: selecttype
CASE 2: drystrat
CASE 6: respirate
CASE 3: SELECT CASE tselect%
CASE 1 : style1
CASE 2: style2
CASE 3. 4: style3
END SELECT
CASE 7: howresultshow
CASE 4: inlet
CASE 8: bedstate
END SELECT
E N D I F
R E T U R N
checkscan:
COLOR dispfore%, disp.back%
GOSUB checkpos
LOCATE vert(svert), hor(shor)
PRINT main$(index)
scan = ASC(RIGHT$(K$, 1))
SELECT CASE scan
CASE 64: oldvert = svert: oldhor = shor
SIMULATE
![Page 144: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
127
‘setconstantGOSUB displaychoice
svert = oldvert: shor = oldhor
CASE 68: don = true
CASE 72: svert = svert - 1
IF svert < minvert THEN svert = maxvert
CASE 80: svert = svert + 1
IF sver t ) maxvert THEN svert = minvert
CASE 75: shor = shor - 1
IF shor ( minhor THEN shor = maxhor
CASE 77: shor = shor + 1
IF shor > maxhor THEN shor = minhor
END SELECT
GOSUB calindex
COLOR dispdore%, disp.back%
GOSUB checkpos
COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%: LOCATE vert(svert), hor(shor)
PRINT main$(index)
R E T U R N
c h e c k p o s :
SELECT CASE index
CASE 3: hor(3) = 46
CASE 7: hor(3) = 55: LOCATE vert(svert), hor(shor): PRINT STRING$(S, ” “)
END SELECT
calindex:
IF svert = 1 THEN
index = shor
ELSE
index = maxhor + shor
E N D I F
R E T U R N
displaychoice:
FOR svert = 1 TO maxvert
FOR shor = 1 TO maxhor
GOSUB calindex
IF index = 3 THEN hor(3) = 46 ELSE hor(3) = 55
COLOR disp,fore%, disp.back%: LOCATE vert(svert), hor(shor)
PRINT main$(index);
NEXT shor
NEXT svert
R E T U R N
11 END SUB
SUB menu
COLOR dlspdore%, disp.back%: CLS
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 1, ” “, “KMITT : GRAIN DRYING SIMULATION (Version 2.0)“, headdore%, head.back%
windw 1, 2, 80, 24, box.fore%, box.back%, false
COLOR dlspdore%, disp.back%
LOCATE 3, 3: PRINT “GRAIN TYPE : *
![Page 145: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
128
LOCATE 4, 3: PRINT ‘DRYER TYPE : ”
LOCATE 3, 24: PRINT “DRYING STRATEGIES : ’
LOCATE 4, 24: PRINT “RESPIRATION EFFECT: ”
LOCATE 3, 46: PRINT “MISSCELLANEOUS DATA”
LOCATE 4, 46: PRINT “RESULT : ”
LOCATE 3, 66: PRINT ‘INLET AIR : ”
LOCATE 4, 66: PRINT “BED STATE : ’
displaytext 2, 79, 2, 6, CHR$(l 96), ” OPTION “, box.iore%, box.back%
clrscr 2, 7, 79, 23, disp.iore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
displaytext I, 80, 1, 25, ” ‘, ’ ’ + CHR5(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
head.back%
E N D S U B
FUNCTION Mequi# (TT, RR)
SELECT CASE gselect% ‘I -paddy,2-corn,3-soybean,4,5-spring onion
CASE 1: Mequi# = 1 / 100 * (LOG(l - RR) / (-7.870001E-06 * (1.8 * TT + 491.7))) n (1 / 2.008)
CASE 2: MequiX = 1 / 100 * (LOG(l - RR) / (-3.074E-05 * (1.8 * TT + 491.7))) “(1 / 1.8156)
CASE 3: Ml = -21065.05952X
M2 = 8.314 * (TT + 273.16) * LOG(RR)
Mequi# = 1 / 100 *(Ml /M2) “(I / 1.2511)
CASE 4, 5: Mequi# = (EXP(1.8436 - .01518 * (TT + 273.16)) / -LOG(RR)) (̂I / 1.36116)
END SELECT
E N D F U N C T I O N
SUB outputdata
displayresult
IF ina = 1 THEN printresults
IF ind = 1 THEN writeresults
E N D S U B
SUB presskey
WHILE INKEYS = “: WEND
E N D S U B
SUB printmenu
clrscr I, 2, 80, 24, disp.iore%, disp.back%, ’ ”
windw I, 3, 30, 6, box.fore%, box.back%, false
IF tselect% = 2 THEN
displaytext I, 29. 1, 2, ’ ‘, ‘Depth m from top of dryer ’ , dispdore%, disp.back%
ELSE
IF tselect% = 1 OR tselect% = 4 THEN
displaytext 1, 29, 2, 2, ’ ‘, ‘Bottom of dryer”, dispdore%, disp.back%
ELSE
displaytext 1, 29, 2, 2, ’ ‘, ‘Top of dryer”, dispfore%, disp.back%
E N D I F
E N D I F
IF tselect% = 2 THEN
displaytext 2, 28, 1, 4, ” ‘, “Length Temperature Moisture’, disp.fore%, disp.back%
ELSE
![Page 146: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
129
IF tselect% = 1 OR tselectk = 4 THEN
displaytext 2, 28, 1, 4, ” ‘, ‘Height Temperature Moisture”, disp.lore%, disp.back%
ELSE
displaytext 2, 28, 1, 4, ” ‘, ” Depth Temperature Moisture”, disp.fore%, disp.back%
E N D I F
E N D I F
displaytext 2, 28, 1, 5, ’ “, ’ (m) (G’C) (%wb) “, disp.fore%, disp.back%
SELECT CASE tselect%
CASE 1:
stl = 24: st2 = 178
CASE 2:
stl = 27: st2 = 25
CASE 3:
stl = 25: st2 = 25
CASE 4:
stl = 24: st2 = 25
END SELECT
windw 1, 2 1 , 30, 23, box.fore%, box.back%, false
displaytext 2, 29, 2, 22, ” ‘, “Air flow ’ + CHR$(stl) + ’ ’ + CHR$(st2) + ’ Grain flow”, disp.iore%, disp.back%
subprint
displaytext 1, 80, 2, 25, ’ “, ’ Simulating”, headdore%, head.back%
E N D S U B
SUB printresults
displaytext 1, 80, 2, 25, ’ “, ” Printing’, head.fore%, head.back%
IF dryt = 0 THEN
SELECT CASE tselect%
CASE 1: LPRINT ’ *** Results of Deep Bed Dryer ***’
CASE 2: LPRINT ’ *** Results of Cross Flow Dryer ***”
CASE 3: LPRINT ” *** Results of Concurrent flow Dryer ***”
CASE 4: LPRINT ” *** Results of Counter flow Dryer ***”
END SELECT
E N D I F
IF tselect% = 2 THEN
LPRINT USING ’ Drying t imes : ####.## hr . “ ; dry t
LPRINT USING ” Depth : ###.## m from the top of dryer”; dryt * VEL
ELSE
LPRINT USING ” Drying t imes : ####.## hr . “ ; dry t
IF tselect% = 1 OR tselect% = 4 THEN
LPRINT TAB(29); “BOTTOM OF DRYER”
ELSE
LPRINT TAE(30); “TOP OF DRYER”
E N D I F
E N D I F
LPRINTTAB(~~);‘========.====:========-=......E.=============================”
IF tselect% = 2 THEN
LPRINT TAB(10); ‘LENGTH (m) TEMPERATURE (C) MOISTURE (%wb) % DML ”
ELSE
IF tselect% = 1 OR tselect% = 4 THEN
![Page 147: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
130
LPRINT TAB( 10); “HEIGHT (m) TEMPERATURE (C) MOISTURE (%wb) % DML ”
ELSE
LPRINT TAB( 10); ’ DEPTH (m) TEMPERATURE (C) MOISTURE (%wb) % DML ’
E N D I F
E N D I F
LPRINT TAB( 12); USING ‘#X.#XX ###.# XX.## “; X(N); TG(0, N); INT(MG(0, N) / (1 + MG(0,
N))*10000+.5)/100
NEXT N
IF cc <) TNOL THEN
N = TNOL
cc = 0
FOR N = U4 TO TNOL STEP U4
cc = cc + u4
LPRINT TAB( 12); USING ‘X#.#X X##.# X#.## “; X(N); TG(0, N); INT(MG(0, N) / (1 + MG(0, N))
*10000+.5)/100
E N D I F
L P R I N T
LPRINT TAB( 12); USING “XX.X# ##X.X #X.## #.XxX’; xx; AGO; AMC; PACDML
LPRINTTAB(lO);“=====================================================”
SELECT CASE &elect%
CASE 1 : stl $ = ‘Upward”: st2$ = “Zero”
CASE 2: stl $ = “Leftward”: st2$ = “Downward”
CASE 3: stl 5 = ‘Downward”: st2$ = ‘Downward’
CASE 4: stl $ = “Upward’: st2$ = ‘Downward”
END SELECT
LPRINT TAB( 10); stl $; ’ air flow ‘; st25; ’ Grain flow’
L P R I N T
IF (tselect% = 2 AND dryt < tend) OR (tselect% = 1 AND (AMC > U8 OR PACDML < US)) THEN
LPRINT TAB( 12); USING ‘Energy for Ian #####.Xx MJ”; EF * 3600 / 1000 / Q5
LPRINT TAB( 12); USING “Energy for heater #####.Xx MJ”; EH / Q6
LPRINT : LPRINT
E N D I F
IF fNT(dryt * loo + .5) I 100 >= tend OR (AMC < u8 OR PACDML > U9) OR tselect% > 2 THEN
LPRINT TAB(23); “SUMMARY DRYING VALUES”
LPRINT TAB(g); USING “Total time ####.## hrs”: dryt
LPRINT TAB(S): USING “Initial moisture content ##.xX %wb”; AMCI
LPRINT TAB(g); USING ’ average temperature ##.## C”; AGOI
LPRINT TAB(S); USING ’ total mass XXX##.## kg”; TIM
LPRINT TAB(S); USING “Present moisture content ##.## %wb”; AMC
LPRINT TAB(S); USING ’ average temperature ##.Xx C”; AGO
LPRINT TAB(S); USING ” total mass #X###.## kg”; TJM
LPRINT TAB(S); USING “Total dry matter loss ###.## %“: PACDML
LPRINT TAB(S); USING “Time of fan operation ###X.Xx hrs”; F T
LPRINT TAB(S); USING “Power for fan #XX.## kW”; PBtotal / Cl5
LPRINT TAB(S); USING ‘Power for constant heating ###.## kW”; GA / HI * VOL / 3600 * CA * TH / Q6
LPRINT TAB(S); USING ‘Power for max temp rise by RHC ###.Xx kW”; GA / HI * VOL / 3600 * CA * T4 / Q6
LPRINT TAB(S); USING “Energy for fan X####.## MJ”; EF * 3600 / 1000 / Q5
LPRINT TAB(S); USING ‘Energy for heater #####.Xx MJ”; EH / Q6
![Page 148: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
131
LPRINT TAB(S); USING ‘Temperature rise by fan ##X.## C’; ST#
LPRINT TAB(Q); USING “Temp rise by constant heating ##X.## C’; TH
LPRINT TAB(Q); USING ‘Max temp rise by RHC ###.## C”; T 4
LPRINT TAB(Q); USING ‘Total pressure X####.## Pa’; PG
LPRINT : LPRINT : LPRINT
E N D I F
displaytext 1, 80, 2, 25, ’ ‘, ‘Press any key’, head.fore%, head.back%
E N D S U B
FUNCTION PVSX (TT)
TT = TT + 273.16
PVS# = EXP(-7511.52 / TT + 89.63121 + 2.399897E-02 ‘TT-.000011654551#*(TT”2)-
.000000012810336# * (TT n 3) + 2.0998405D-11 * (TT n 4) - 12.150799# * LOG(TT))
E N D F U N C T I O N
SUB respirate
IF tselect% <> 1 THEN
IFHEAT% = 2: main5(6) = “N”
ELSE
DIM resp$(2)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ ‘, msg5(2), head.fore%, head.back%
resp$( 1 ) = “Include”
resp5(2) = ‘Not include’
sp% = 35: ep% = 46
resmin = 1 : resmax = 2: asciicode = 0: scancode = 0
clrscr 33, 10, 48, 15, disp.fore%, disp.back%, ’ ’
win& 33, 10, 48, 15, box.fore%. box.back%, true
display (IFHEAT%), (resmin), (resmax), sp%, ep%, 12, resp5()
WHILE asciicode (t 13
K$ = INKEY
I = LEN(K5)
IF I = 2 THEN
scancode = ASC(RIGHT$(K$, 1))
IF (scancode = 72) OR (scancode = 80) THEN
adjust (scancode), IFHEAT%, (resmin), (resmax)
display (IFHEAT%), (resmin), (resmax), sp%, ep%, 12, resp$()
E N D I F
ELSE
IF I = 1 THEN
asciicode = ASC(LEFT$(K$, 1))
E N D I F
E N D I F
W E N D
clrscr 33, 10, 49, 16. dispfore%, disp.back%, CHR5(1 76)
SELECT CASE IFHEAT%
CASE 1: main5(6) = ‘I’
CASE 2: main5(6) = “N’
END SELECT
![Page 149: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
132
displaytext I, 80, I, 25, ’ ‘, ’ ’ + CHR5(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), headdore%,
head.back%
E N D I F
END SUB
FUNCTION RHuX (TT, WW)
RHUX = ww * I 01.325 I (PVSX((TT)) * (.62198 + ww))E N D F U N C T I O N
SUB selectgrain
DIM graintype5(5)
displaytext 1, 80, I, 25, ” “, msg$(2), head.lore%, head.back%
graintype$( 1) = ‘Paddy’
graintype5(2) = ‘Corn’
graintype5(3) = ‘Soybean”
graintype$(4) = ‘Spring Onion (c)”
graintype$(5) = “Spring Onion (v)”
sp% = 34: ep% = 48: dp% = 1
gmin = 1 : gmax = 5: asciicode = 0: scancode = 0
clrscr 32, IO, 50. 18, disp.iore%, disp.back%, ’ ’
windw 32, 10, 50, 18, box.fore%, box.back%, true
display (gselect%), (gmin), (gmax), sp%, ep%, 12, gt$()
WHILE asciicode 0 13
K5 = INKEY
I = LEN(K5)
IF I = 2 THEN
scancode = ASC(RIGHT$(K$, 1))
IF (scancode = 72) OR (scancode = 80) THEN
adjust (scancode), gselect%, (gmin), (gmax)
display (gselect%), (gmin), (gmax), sp%, ep%, 12, gt$()
E N D I F
ELSE
IF I = 1 THEN
asciicode = ASC(LEFT$(K$, 1))
E N D I F
E N D I F
W E N D
clrscr 32, IO, 51, 19, disp.fore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
SELECT CASE gselect%
CASE 1: main$(l ) = ‘Paddy ”
CASE 2: main$(l) = ‘Corn ’
CASE 3: main$( 1) = “Soybean’
CASE 4: main$( 1) = “Onion(c)”
CASE 5: main$( 1) = “Onion(v)”
END SELECT
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” ‘, ” ” + CHR$(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR$(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), headdore%,
h e a d . b a c k %
E N D S U B
![Page 150: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
133
SUB selecttype
DIM dryertype5(4)
displaytext 1, 80. 1, 25, ’ ‘, msg5(2), head.lore%, head.back%
dryertype$( 1) = ‘DEEP DED DRYER’
dryertype$(2) = “CROSS FLOW DRYER”
dryertype5(3) = “CONCURRENT FLOW DRYER”
dryertype5(4) = “COUNTER FLOW DRYER”
sp% = 28: ep% = 51: dp% = 1
tmin = 1: tmax = 4: asciicode = 0: scancode = 0
clrscr 26, 9, 53, 16, disp.fore%, disp.back%, ” ”
windw 26, 9, 53, 16, box.iore%, box.back%, true
display (&elect%), (tmin), (tmax), sp%, ep%, 1 1, dryertype$()
WHILE asciicode o 13
K$ = INKEY
I = LEN(K$)
IF I = 2 THEN
scancode = ASC(RIGHT$(K$, 1))
IF (scancode = 72) OR (scancode = 80) THEN
adjust (scancode), tselect%, (tmin), (tmax)
display (tselect%), (tmin), (tmax), sp%, ep%, 11, dryertype
E N D I F
ELSE
IF I = 1 THEN
asciicode = ASC(LEFT$(K$, 1))
E N D I F
E N D I F
W E N D
clrscr 26, 9, 54, 17, dispfore%. disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
SELECT CASE tselect%
CASE 1: maln$(5) = “DEEP ”
CASE 2: main5(5) = “CROSS ’
CASE 3: main$(5) = “CONCURR”
CASE 4: main$(5) = “COUNTER”
END SELECT
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” “, ” ” + CHR5(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
head.back%
E N D S U B
SUB setconstant
gt%(l) = “Paddy”: gt5(2) = ‘Corn”: gt5(3) = “Soybean”: gt$(4) = “Onion(c)“: gt5(5) = “Onion(v)”
dt$( 1) = “DEEP’: dt5(2) = “CROSS’: dt5(3) = ‘CONCURR”: dt5(4) = “COUNTER”
dstrat$( 1) = “Continuous aeration”
dstrat5(2) = “On-off fan <select RH>”
dstrat5(3) = “Relative humidity control’
reseff$( 1 ) = “Include’: reseii5(2) = “Not include’
gselect% = 1 : tselect% = 1 : strat% = 0: IFHEAT% = 2: hrs% = 5: INWI = 1 : ING% = 1
HI = .I : VOL = .2928: DX = .0025: DIA = ,008: HOUR = 6: dt = .05: NH = .I 6667: GV = 15.20125
CO = 1 : U8 = 10: UQ = .5: tip = 1: hfp = .l : TH = 0: U4 = hip / DX
LENG = 1: VEL = ,I : DY = .l: WID = 1: hfp = ,l
![Page 151: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
134
TA = 30: RA = 70: TG = 25: MG = 95: TIDM = 1: AMC = 20: xx = .1
CN = 1: YN = 1: Rshow = 1: choose% = 5: hrs% = 5:
‘Ql ,Q2:const ,SF:saity factor , Q4:fan eff ic iency,
‘~25: motor eiliciency, Q6:heater efficiency
Q4 = .5: Q5 = ,721 Q6 = 1
main$( 1) = “Paddy ‘: main$(2) = ‘C’: main5(3) = “MISSCELLANEOUS DATA’
main5(4) = ‘C’: main5(5) = ‘DEEP “: main$(6) = “N’
main$(7) = ” D -I ‘: main5(8) = ‘C’: Rshow$ = ‘Intermittent Results”
writefile = 0
ina = 2: ind = 2
E N D S U B
SUB SIMULATE
ON ERROR GOT0 fileerr
initial
printmenu
SELECT CASE tselect%
CASE 1: tend = HOUR
CASE 2: tend = LENG / VEL
CASE 3, 4: tend = HI / VEL
END SELECT
NOL = 0: dryt = 0: tprint = 0: TREAD = 0: II = 0: N = 0
SMC = 0: SGO = 0: PACDML = 0: xx = 0: TJDM = TIDM
FOR ZI% = 1 TO TNOL
SMC = SMC + MG(0, Zl%)
SGO = SGO + TG(0, ZI%)
xx = xx + X(ZI%)
IIDM(ZI%) = JIDM
NEXT ZI%
calmean
outputdata
tprint = tprint + tip
D O
U2 = U2 + 1: dryt = dryt + INT(dt * 100 + ,5) / 100: II = II + 1
dt2 = dt2 + dt
IF INW% <> 1 THEN
IF dryt )= TREAD THEN
IF gselect% = 5 THEN
INPUT X2, TA, RA, GV, TH
ELSE
INPUT #2, TA, RA
E N D I F
IF errcheck <> 0 THEN
EXIT SUB
E N D I F
RA=RA/lOO
TREAD = TREAD + NH
E N D I F
E N D I F
![Page 152: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/152.jpg)
135
WO = .62198 * PVS#((TA)) * RA / (101.325 - PVS#((TA)) * RA)
TO =TA+BTX +TH
RO = WO * 101.325 / (PVSX((T0)) * (.62198 + WO))
SELECT CASE YN
C A S E 1
IF RO <= CN THEN
T2 = TH: FT = FT + dt
EF = EF + dt * PB
EH=EH+VOL*(GA/HI)*dt*CA*T2/l000
E N D I F
CASE ELSE
FT = FT + dt
IF RO > CN THEN
RO = CN
PS = WO * 101.325 / RO / (.62189 + WO)
TF = 25: done = false
DO WHILE done = false
TT = TF + 273.16
Fl =EXP(-7511.52/TT+89.63121 +2,399897E-02*TT-.000011654551#*(TT”
.000000012810336# * (TT n 3) + 2,0998405D-11 * (TT n 4) - 12.150799# * LOG(TT)) - PS
F2=PS*(7511.52/(TT”2)+2.399897E-02-(2*1.165451E-05)*TT-(3*
.000000012810336#)*(TT”2)+(4*2.0998405D-11)*(TT”3)-(12.150799#)/(TT))
TN = TF - Fl / F2
IF ABS(TN - TF) > ,001 THEN
TF = TN
E L S E
done = true
E N D I F
LOOP
TO = TN
T2 = TO -TA - BT#
T3 = T2 - TH
IF T3 a T4 THEN T4 = T3
ELSE
T2 = TH
E N D I F
EH=EH+VOL*(GA/HI)*dt*CA*T2/1000
END SELECT
TJDM = 0: PACDML = 0: SMC = 0: SGO = 0: xx = 0
SELECT CASE tselect%
CASE 1, 2: NOL = TNOL
layl?r
CASE 3: dryt = 0
EH = 0
EH=EH+VOL*(GA/HI)*tend*CA*T2/1000
FOR LP = 1 TO TNOL
IF INW% o 1 THEN
IF dryt >= TREAD THEN
INPUT X2, TA, RA
![Page 153: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/153.jpg)
136
IF errcheck o 0 THEN
EXIT SUB
E N D I F
RA=RA/lOO
TREAD = TREAD + NH
E N D I F
E N D I F
WO = .62198 * PVS#((TA)) * RA / (101.325 - PVS#((TA)) * RA)
TO =TA+BT# +TH
RO = WO * 101.325 / (PVS#((TO)) * (.62198 + WO))
TJDM = 0: SMC = 0: SGO = 0: PACDML = 0
dryt = dryt + dt: NOL = LP
layer
TO = TA+ STX +TH
FOR KK = 1 TO NOL
MG(0, KK + 1) = MG( 1, KK): TG(0, KK + 1) = TG( 1, KK)
NEXT KK
MG(0, 1) = MG / (1 - MG): TG(0, 1) = TO
NEXT LP
CASE 4: FOR chklp% = 1 TO 2
dryt = 0
IF chklp% = 2 THEN initial
EH=EH+VOL*(GA/HI)*tend*CA*T2/1000
FOR LP = 1 TO TNOL
IF INW% o 1 THEN
IF dryt >= TREAD THEN
INPUT #2, TA, RA
IF errcheck 0 0 THEN
EXIT SUB
E N D I F
RA=RA/lOO
TREAD = TREAD + NH
E N D I F
E N D I F
WO = .62198 * PVS#((TA)) * RA / (101.325 - PVS#((TA)) * RA)
IF chklp% = 2 THEN
TO = TRTG(TNOL - LP + 1)
WO = TRWO(TNOL - LP + 1)
E L S E
TO =TA + EITX +TH
TRTG(l) = TO: TRWO(l) = WO
E N D I F
RO = WO * 101.325 / (PVS#((TO)) ’ (.62198 + WO))
TJDM = 0: SMC = 0: SGO = 0: PACDML = 0
dryt = dryt + dt: NOL = LP:
l a y e r
FOR KK = 1 TO NOL
MG(0, KK) = MG(1, KK): TG(0, KK) = TG(1, KK)
NEXT KK
![Page 154: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/154.jpg)
137
MG(0, LP + 1) = MG / (1 - MG): TG(0, LP + 1) = TG
NEXT LP
NEXT chklp%
END SELECT
calmean
adjdryt = INT(dryt * 100 + .5) / 100
SELECT CASE tselect%
CASE 1:
IF AMC > U8 AND PACDML < US THEN
IF adjdryt >= tprint OR adjdryt >= tend THEN
outputdata
tpr in t = tp r in t + t fp
E N D I F
ELSE
outputdata
dryt = tend
E N D I F
CASE 2:
IF dryt q LENG / VEL THEN
IF dry t >= tpr int THEN
outputdata
tprint = tprint + hfp / VEL
E N D I F
E L S E
outputdata
dryt = tend
E N D I F
CASE 3, 4:
outputdata
dryt = tend
END SELECT
IF gselect% = 5 THEN
IF dryt >= tVTlDM THEN
VTIDM
tVTlDM = tend + NH
EF = EF * 3
EH = EH * 3
E N D I F
E N D I F
LOOP UNTIL INT(dryt * 100 + .5) / 100 )= tend
CLOSE
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” “. ’ Press any key to continue”, head.fore%, head.back%
presskey
E N D S U B
SUB style1
DIM inp$( 14)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” “, msg$(3), headdore%, head.back%
maxinp% = 1 1: maxy% = 18
![Page 155: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/155.jpg)
138
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
maxinp% = maxinp% + 1: maxy% = maxy% + 1
E N D I F
IF INW% = 2 THEN
maxinp% = maxinp% + 1: maxy% = maxy% + 1
E N D I F
IF ING% = 2 THEN
maxinp% = maxinp% + 1: maxy% = maxyk + 1
E N D I F
clrscr 2, 7, 78, maxy% + 2, disp.fore%, disp.back%. ’ ’
windw 2, 7, 78, maxy% + 2, box.fore%, box.back%, false
COLOR dispdore%, disp.back%
x2% = 51: minx% = 4
mininp% = 1: miny% = 8: yl% = 8
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ‘Height of rough grain”
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “m”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ‘Volume of rough grain’
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “m”3”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Thickness of thin layer’
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘m’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
IF gselectk = 2 THEN
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “DifU Energy for heater MJ Iu”;=yl%+l
LOCATE ~146, 65: PRINT ‘m’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
E N D I F
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Drying t ime”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘hr’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl %, minx%
PRINT ‘Calculation time interval’
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘hr’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
IF INW% = 2 THEN
LOCATE ~146, minx%
PRINT “Interval of weather data”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘hr.: ~1% = ~1% + 1
E N D I F
IF gselect% <> 5 THEN
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ‘Air flow rate”
IF gselect% = 4 THEN
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT ‘m”3/min-kg(dry)‘: ~1% = ~1% + 1
ELSE
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘m”3/min-m”3’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
E N D I F
ELSE
LOCATE yl %, minx%
![Page 156: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/156.jpg)
139
PRINT “Time at add batch”
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT ‘hr”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
E N D I F
IF ING% = 2 THEN
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Number of layer for initial grain data”: ~1% = yl % + 1
ELSE
co = 1
E N D I F
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Desired average final moisture content”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “%wb”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Maximum total dry matter loss”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “46’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE ~1%. minx%
PRINT “Printing time interval’
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “hr”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Thickness of grain layer for printing result”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “m’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Temperature rised by heater’
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “dC”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl %, minx%: COLOR choicedore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘Temperature rised by fan X#.#### dC’; BTX
DIM dat(maxinp%)
num% = 1
dat(num%) = HI: inp$(num%) = “HI”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = VOL: inp$(num%) = “VOL’: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = DX: inp$(num%) = “DX”: num% = num% + 1
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
dat(num%) = DIA: inp$(num%) = “DIA”: num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
dat(num%) = HOUR: inp$(num%) = “HOUR”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = dt: inp$(num%) = ‘DT’: num% = num% + 1
IF INW% = 2 THEN
dat(num%) = NH: inp$(num%) = “NH”: num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
IF gselect% o 5 THEN
dat(num%) = GV: inp$(num%) = “GV”: num% = num% + 1
ELSE
dat(num%) = tVTIDM: inp$(num%) = YVTIDM”: num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
IF ING% = 2 THEN
dat(num%) = CO: inp$(num%) = “CO”: num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
dat(num%) = U8: inp$(num%) = “UE”: numk = num% + 1
dat(num%) = US: inp$(num%) = “US’: num% = num% + 1
![Page 157: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/157.jpg)
140
dat(num%) = tfp: inp$(num%) = “tfp’: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = hfp: inp$(num%) = “U6”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = TH: inp$(num%) = “TH”
yi%=aFOR num% = 1 TO maxinps
LOCATE yl %, x2%, 1 : COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%
PRINT USING “XX###.#####“; dat(num%); : ~1% = ~1% + 1
NEXT num%
num% = 1: ~1% = 8
LOCATE yl%, x2%: COLOR choice,fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘##XX#.#####“; dat(num%)
done = false
WHILE done = false
in$ = INKEY
dis = LEN(in5)
SELECT CASE dis
CASE 1: GOSUB ascii
CASE 2: GOSUB scan
END SELECT
W E N D
GOSUB TRAN
clrscr 2, 7, 79, maxy% + 2, disp.fore%, disp.back%, CHR5( 176)
displaytext I, 80, 1, 25, ” “, ” ’ + CHR5(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), head.iore%,
head.back%
GOT0 12
ascii:
ascii = ASC(LEFT$(in$, 1))
IF ascii = 13 THEN
SELECT CASE inp$(num%)
CASE “HI”: dat(num%) = GetNumX(yl%, x2%, 10, ,005, 100)
CASE “VOL”: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 o/o, x2%, 10, .OOOl, 100000)
CASE “DX”: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, .OOOl, 10)
CASE “DIA’: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, ,003, ,015)
CASE “HOUR”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, .Ol , 4000)
CASE “DT’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, .Ol, 5)
CASE “NH”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl %, x2%, 10, .Ol , 5)
CASE “GV”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, .Ol , 100)
CASE ‘tVTIDM’: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, .I, 10)
CASE “CO’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, 1, 20)
CASE “U8”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, 1, 30)
CASE “U9”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl %, x2%, 10, .Ol, 5)
CASE “tfp’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, .Ol, 100)
CASE “U6”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, .Ol , 5)
CASE “TH’: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, .Ol, 140)
END SELECT
E N D I F
LOCATE yl %, x2%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “#####.#####“: dat(num%)
GOSUB TRAN
![Page 158: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/158.jpg)
141
clearline 4, 76, me.xy% + I, ’ ‘, dispdore%, disp.back%
LOCATE maxy% + I, minx%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘Temperature rised by fan R#.%### dC”; BT#
R E T U R N
s c a n :
scan = ASC(RIGHT$(in$, 1))
LOCATE yl %, x2%: COLOR dispdoresb, disp.back%
PRINT USING “#####.##XX#“; dat(num%)
SELECT CASE scan
CASE 68: done = true
CASE 72: num% = num% - 1: ~1% = ~1% - 1
IF num% ( mininp% THEN
num% = maxinp%: yl% = maxy%
E N D I F
CASE 80: num% = num% + 1: ~1% = ~1% + 1
IF num% ) maxinp% THEN
num% = mininp%: ~1% = miny%
E N D I F
END SELECT
LOCATE yl 2, x2%: COLOR choicedore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘#XXX#.####%‘; dat(num%)
GOSUB TRAN
clearline 4, 76, maxy% + 1, ’ “, disp.fore%, disp.back%
LOCATE maxy% + 1, minx%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘Temperature rised by fan ##.#### dC’; BT#
R E T U R N
T R A N :
oldnum% = num%: num% = 1
HI = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
VOL = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
DX = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
DIA = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
HOUR = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
dt = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
IF INW% = 2 THEN
NH = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
IF gselect% o 5 THEN
GV = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
ELSE
tVTlDM = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
IF ING% = 2 THEN
CO = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
U8 = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
U9 = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
![Page 159: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/159.jpg)
142
tfp = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
hfp = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1: U4 = hfp / DX
TH = dat(num%)
num% = oldnum%
R E T U R N
12 END SUB
S U B s t y l e 2
DIM inp$( 12)
displaytext I, 80, 1, 25, ” ‘, msg5(3), head.fore%, head.back%
maxinp% = 10: maxy% = 18
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
maxinp% = maxinp% + 1 : maxy% = maxy% + 1
E N D I F
IF INW% = 2 THEN
maxinp% = maxinp% + 1: maxy% = maxy% + 1
E N D I F
clrscr 2, 8, 78, maxy% + 2, disp.fore%, disp.back%, ” ”
windw 2, 8, 78, maxy% + 2, box.fore%, box.back%, false
COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%
x2% = 51: minx% = 4
mininp% = 1: miny% = 9: ~1% = 9
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Height of rough grain’
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “m”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Velocity of grain’
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “m/h”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Thickness of thin layer along vertical direction’
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “m”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl %, minx%
PRINT “Width of dryer [ face to hot air ] ’
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “m”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ‘Length of dryer [along hot air flow direction]”
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “m”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl %, minx%
PRINT ‘Thickness of thin layer along air flow direct.’
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “m”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
LOCATE ~1%. minx%
PRINT “Diameter of grain”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘m’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
E N D I F
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Air flow rate’
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “m”3/min-m”3”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
co = 1
![Page 160: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/160.jpg)
143
IF INW% = 2 THEN
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Interval of weather data”: yl % = ~1% + 1
E N D I F
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ‘Height interval for printing result”
LOCATE ~1%. 65: PRINT “m’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ‘Length interval for printing result”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “m’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl %, minx%
PRINT “Temperature rised by heater’
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “dC”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl %, minx%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “Temperature rised by fan #X.##X# dC”; BTX
DIM dat(maxinp%)
num% = 1
dat(num%) = LENG: inp$(num%) = “LENG’: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = VEL: inp$(num%) = “VEL”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = DY: inp$(num%) = “DY”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = WID: inp$(num%) = “WID”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = HI: inp$(num%) = ‘HI”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = DX: inp$(num%) = ‘DX”: num% = num% + 1
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
dat(num%) = DIA: inp$(num%) = “DIA’: num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
dat(num%) = GV: inp$(num%) = ‘GV”: num% = num% + 1
IF INW% = 2 THEN
dat(num%) = NH: inp$(num%) = “NH’: num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
dat(num%) = hfp: inp$(num%) = ‘HFP”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = hfp: inp$(num%) = “U6’: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = TH: inp$(num%) = “TH’
yl%=9
FOR num% = 1 TO maxinp%
LOCATE yl %, x2%: COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%
PRINT USING “#####.#XXXX’: dat(num%); : yl % = ~1% + 1
NEXT num%
num% = 1: ~1% = 9
LOCATE yl %, x2%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “####X.X####‘; dat(num%)
done = false
WHILE done = false
in5 = INKEY
dis = LEN(in5)
SELECT CASE dis
CASE 1 : GOSUB asciil
CASE 2: GOSUB scan1
END SELECT
![Page 161: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/161.jpg)
144
W E N D
GOSUB tranl
clrscr 2, 8, 79, maxy% + 3, disp.fore%, disp.back%. CHR$( 1 76)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ ‘, ’ ’ + CHR$(27) + CHR$(24) + CHR$(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
head.back%
GOT0 13
ascii 1 :
ascii = ASC(LEFT$(in$, 1))
IF ascii = 13 THEN
SELECT CASE inp$(num%)
CASE “LENG”: dat(num%) = GetNumX(yl%, x2%, 10, .Ol, 100)
CASE “VEL’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, 0, 100)
CASE ‘DY’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%. 10, .OOOl, 10)
CASE “WID’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, .Ol, 50)
CASE “HI”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, .Ol , 100)
CASE “DX”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10. ,001, 10)
CASE “DIA’: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, .003, ,015)
CASE ‘GV’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, .Ol, 100)
CASE ‘NH’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, .Ol, 5)
CASE “HFP”: dat(num%) = GetNumX(yl%, x2%, 10, .Ol, 5)
CASE “U6”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%. x2%, IO. .Ol , 5)
CASE “TH’: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, 0, 140)
END SELECT
E N D I F
LOCATE yl %, x2%: COLOR choicefore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “##XXX.#####‘; dat(num%)
GOSUB tran 1
clearline 4, 76, maxy% + 1, ’ ‘, dispfore%, disp.back%
LOCATE maxy% + 1, minx%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “Temperature rised by fan ##.#### dC’: BT#
R E T U R N
scan 1 :
scan = ASC(RIGHT$(in$, 1))
LOCATE yl %, x2%: COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%
PRINT USING ‘###X#.#####‘; dat(num%)
SELECT CASE scan
CASE 68: done = true
CASE 72: num% = num% - 1: ~1% = ~1% - 1
IF num% < mininp% THEN
num% = maxinp%: yl% = maxy%
E N D I F
CASE 80: num% = num% + 1: ~1% = ~1% + 1
IF num% > maxinp% THEN
num% = mininp%: ~1% = miny%
E N D I F
END SELECT
LOCATE yl%, x2%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘###XX.#####“; dat(num%)
GOSUB tranl
![Page 162: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/162.jpg)
145
clearline 4, 76, maxy% + 1, ” ‘, dispdore%, disp.back%
LOCATE maxy% + 1, minx%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “Temperature rised by fan XX.X### dC’; STX
R E T U R N
tran 1 :
oldnum% = num%: num% = 1
LENG = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
VEL = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
DY = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
WID = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
HI = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
DX = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
DIA = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
GV = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
IF INW% = 2 THEN
NH = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
hfp = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
hfp = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1: U4 = hfp / DX
TH = dat(num%)
IF VEL = 0 THEN VEL = .l
VOL = WID * HI * DY: dt = DY / VEL
num% = oldnum%
R E T U R N
13 END SUB
S U B s t y l e 3
DIM inp5(9)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ’ ‘, msg$(3), head,fore%, head.back%
maxmp% = 7: maxy% = 16
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
maxinpa = maxinpk + 1: maxy% = maxys + 1
E N D I F
IF INW% = 2 THEN
maxinp% = maxinpc + 1: maxy% = maxys + 1
E N D I F
clrscr 2, 9, 78, maxy% + 2, disp.fore%, disp.back%, * ’
windw 2, 9, 78, maxy% + 2, box.fore%, box.back%, false
COLOR dispdore%, disp.back%
x2% = 5 1: minx% = 3
mininp% = 1 : miny% = 10: yl% = 10
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ‘Height of rough grain”
LOCATE ~1%. 65: PRINT ‘m”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE ~1%. minx%
PRINT “Volume of grain”
LOCATE ~1%. 65: PRINT “m&3”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
![Page 163: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/163.jpg)
146
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT ‘Velocity of grain ”
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “m/h’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Thickness of thin layer’
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘m’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
IF gselecta = 2 THEN
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Diameter of grain”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘m’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
E N D I F
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Air ilow rate”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT ‘mA3/min-m”3”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
co = 1
IF INW% = 2 THEN
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Interval of weather data’
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “hr”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
E N D I F
LOCATE yl %, minx%
PRINT ‘Thickness of thin layer for printing result”
LOCATE yl %, 65: PRINT “m”: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl%, minx%
PRINT “Temperature rised by heater”
LOCATE yl%, 65: PRINT “dC’: ~1% = ~1% + 1
LOCATE yl %, minx%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘Temperature rised by fan ##.#### dC’; ST#
DIM dat(maxinp%)
num% = 1
dat(num%) = HI: inp$(num%) = “HI’: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = VOL: inp$(num%) = ‘VOL”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = VEL: inp$(num%) = ‘VEL”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = DX: inp$(num%) = “DX”: num% = num% + 1
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
dat(num%) = DIA: inp$(num%) = “DIA’: num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
dat(num%) = GV: inp$(num%) = “GV”: num% = num% + 1
IF INW% = 2 THEN
dat(num%) = NH: inp$(num%) = “NH’: num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
dat(num%) = hfp: inp$(num%) = “U6”: num% = num% + 1
dat(num%) = TH: inp$(num%) = “TH’
Yl% = 10
FOR num% = 1 TO maxinp%
LOCATE yl %, x2%, 1 : COLOR dispdore%, disp.back%:
PRINT USING ‘#####.#####‘; dat(num%); : ~1% = ~1% + 1
NEXT num%
num% = 1: yl% = 10
![Page 164: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/164.jpg)
147
LOCATE yl%, x2%: COLOR choicelore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “#X###.#####“; dat(num%)
done = lalse
WHILE done = false
in$ = INKEY
dis = LEN(in$)
SELECT CASE dis
CASE 1: GOSUS ascii2
CASE 2: GOSUS scan2
END SELECT
W E N D
GOSUB tran3
clrscr 2, 9, 79, maxy% + 3, disp,fore%, disp.back%, CHR$(l 76)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” “, ” ” + CHR5(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR5(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), headdore%,
head.back%
GOT0 14
ascii2:
ascii = ASC(LEFT$(in$, 1))
IF ascii = 13 THEN
SELECT CASE inp$(num%)
CASE “HI’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, .I, 100)
CASE ‘VOL.: dat(num%) = GetNumX(yl%, x2%, 10, .OOOl , 100000)
CASE “VEL”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl %, x2%, 10, .OOOl, 100)
CASE “DX”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl 46, x2%. 10, .OOOl, 10)
CASE “DIA”: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%, 10, ,003, ,015)
CASE “GV”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, ,001, 100)
CASE “NH’: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl k, x2%, 10, .Ol, 5)
CASE ‘U6’: dat(num%) = GetNumX(y1 %, x2%. 10, .Ol, 10)
CASE ‘TH”: dat(num%) = GetNum#(yl%, x2%, 10, 0, 140)
END SELECT
E N D I F
LOCATE yl%, x2%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “##XX#.X##XX”; dat(num%)
GOSUS tran3
clearline 4, 76, maxy% + 1, ’ ‘, disp,fore%, disp.back%
LOCATE maxyk + 1, minx%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “Temperature rised by Ian ##.X### dC”; ST#
R E T U R N
scan2:
scan = ASC(RIGHT$(in$, 1))
LOCATE yl %, x2%: COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%
PRINT USING “#####.#####“; dat(num%)
SELECT CASE scan
CASE 68: done = true
CASE 72: num% = num% - 1: ~1% = ~1% - 1
IF num% < mininp% THEN
num% = maxinp%: ~1% = maxy%
E N D I F
CASE80:num%=num%+1:yl%=yl%+l
![Page 165: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/165.jpg)
148
IF num% > maxinp% THEN
num% = mininps: yl% = miny%
E N D I F
END SELECT
LOCATE yl %, x2%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING “#####.#####“; dat(num%)
GOSUB tran3
clearfine 4, 76, maxy% + 1, ’ ‘, dispdore%, disp.back%
LOCATE maxy% + 1, minx%: COLOR choice.fore%, choice.back%
PRINT USING ‘Temperature rised by fan XX.##X# dC”; BT#
R E T U R N
tran3:
oldnumc = num%: num% = 1
HI = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
VOL = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
VEL = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
DX = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
IF gselect% = 2 THEN
DIA = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
GV = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
IF INW% = 2 THEN
NH = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1
E N D I F
hfp = dat(num%): num% = num% + 1: U4 = hfp / DX
TH = dat(num%)
IF VEL = 0 THEN VEL = .l
dt = DX / VEL
num% = oldnum%
R E T U R N
14 END SUB
SUB subprint
L O C ATE 3,31: PRiNTPaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa~~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa~~~~aaaaa~,;
LOCATE 4, 31: PRINT ’ 111 SUMMARY DRYING VALUES N”;
LOCATE 5. 31: PRINT ’ Iu Total time hrs T!A*;
LOCATE 6, 31 : PRINT ” N Initial moisture content : %wb N”;
LOCATE 7, 31: PRINT ” tu average temperature : dC fur;
LOCATE 8, 31: PRINT ” 1u total mass kg N’;
LOCATE 9, 31 : PRINT ” 1u Present moisture content : %wb N”;
LOCATE 10, 3 1: PRINT ” Iw average temperature : dC N”;
LOCATE 11, 31: PRINT ” fU total mass : kg Iw”;
LOCATE 12, 3 1: PRINT ’ Iu Total dry matter loss : % Iu’;
LOCATE 13, 31 : PRINT ’ Iw Time of fan operation hrs N”;
LOCATE 14, 3 1: PRINT ” ft& Power for fan kW 1u”:
LOCATE 15, 3 1 : PRINT ” Cu Power for constant heating : kW Iu”;
LOCATE 16, 31: PRINT ’ Iu Power for max temp rise by RHC: kW N”;
LOCATE 17, 3 1: PRINT ” Iw Energy for fan MJ IM”;
LOCATE 1 8, 31 : PRINT ” Iu Energy for heater MJ Iu’;
![Page 166: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/166.jpg)
149
LOCATE 19, 31 : PRINT ” fU Temperature rise by fan : dC l-l&,;
LOCATE 20, 31: PRINT ’ Iu Temp rise by constant heating : dC Iw”;
LOCATE 21, 31: PRINT ’ Iw Max temp rise by RHC : dC fu”;
LOCATE 22, 31 : PRINT ” Iw Total pressure Pa lu”;
LOCATE 23,31:PRlNT Paaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa~":
E N D S U B
SUB Vinp (vcheck)
ON ERROR GOT0 fileerr
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” “, ” type \ after Path of DRIVE : A:\data\“, head.fore%, head.back%
clrscr 16, 18, 62, 21, dispdore%, disp.back%, ’ ”
windw 16, 18, 62, 21, box.fore%, box.back%, true
minx = 18: yl% = 19: x2% = 47
LOCATE yl%, minx: COLOR disp.fore%, disp.back%
SELECT CASE vcheck
CASE 1 : PRINT “Weather data in DRIVE [Path]:’
CASE 2: PRINT ‘Grain data in DRIVE [Path] :”
CASE 3: PRINT ‘Result data in DRIVE [Path] :’
END SELECT
clearline x2%, 61, yl %, ” “, choice,fore%, choice.back%
F$ = gettext$(x2%, yl%, 14)
SELECT CASE vcheck
CASE 1: wdrive$ = F5
CASE 2: gdrive5 = F5
CASE 3: rdrive5 = F$
END SELECT
x2%=41:yl%=yl%+l
LOCATE yl %, minx: COLOR dispfore%, disp.back%
SELECT CASE vcheck
CASE 1 : PRINT “Weather data fi lename : .DAT”
CASE 2: PRINT “Grain data filename : .DAT”
CASE 3: PRINT “Result data filename : .DAT’
END SELECT
clearline x2%, 48, yl %, ” “, choiceJore%, choice.back%
F5 = gettext$(x2%, ~1%. 8)
SELECT CASE vcheck
CASE 1: WEATH5 = F$ + “.DAT”: OPEN ‘I”, #2, wdrive5 + WEATH5
CASE 2: GRAIN5 = F5 + ‘.DAT”: OPEN ‘I’, #I, gdrive$ + GRAIN5
CASE 3: RES5 = F5 + “.DAT’: OPEN “O”, #3, rdrive5 + RES5
END SELECT
IF errcheck o 0 THEN
SELECT CASE vcheck
CASE 1: INW% = 1: main5(4) = “C”
CASE 2: ING% = 1: main$(E) = “C”
CASE 3:
IF ina = 1 THEN
ind = 2: main5(7) = ” D&P ’
E L S E
ind = 2: main5(7) = ” D ’
![Page 167: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/167.jpg)
150
E N D I F
END SELECT
E N D I F
clrscr 16, 18, 63, 22, disp.fore%, disp.back%, CHR5( 1 76)
displaytext 1, 80, 1, 25, ” “, ” ” + CHR$(27) + CHR5(24) + CHR$(26) + CHR5(25) + msg$(l), head.fore%,
head.back%
E N D S U B
SUB VTIDM
N = O
FOR J = 1 TO NOL
N=N+l
MG( 1, N) = MG(0, J)
WDM(N) = WDM(J)
U = U + VOL / HI * WDM(J)
N=N+l
MG(1, N) = MG(0, J)
WDM(N) = WDM(J)
U = U + VOL / HI * WDM(J)
N=N+l
MG(1, N) = MG(0, J)
WDM(N) = WDM(J)
U = U + VOL / HI * WDM(J)
TNOL = N
NEXT J
TIDM = U
FOR J = 1 TO TNOL
MG(0, J) = MG(1, J)
TG(0, J) = TA
NEXT J
E N D S U B
FUNCTION VV# (MM)
SELECT CASE gselect% ‘grain density 1 -paddy,2-corn,3-soybean,4,5-spring onion
CASE 1: VVX = .001997 + .0012 * MM
CASE 2: VVX = .0014854008# + l.l4899E-05 * MM
CASE 3: VVX = .0013816424# + 1,38932E-05 * MM
CASE 4, 5: VV# = .025505# + .004812X * MM - .00034227# * MM h 2 + 9.470000000000001 D-06 * MM h
3
END SELECT
E N D F U N C T I O N
SUB wlndw (xl %, yl %, x2%, y2%, foreground%, background%, shadow)
COLOR foreground%, background%: LOCATE yl%, xl %, 0: PRINT CHR$(POl);
FOR count% = xl % + 1 TO x2% - 1: PRINT CHR$(205); : NEXT count%: PRINT CHR$(187)
‘top
FOR count% = ~1% + 1 TO ~2% - 1: LOCATE count%, xl 2, 0: PRINT CHR$( 186): NEXT count%
‘lef t
FOR count% = ~1% + 1 TO ~2% - 1: LOCATE count%, x2%, 0: PRINT CHR$(186): NEXT count%
![Page 168: A-). . . . . . .. (%Fl.vl%. &-%A& J$&ler) for ThaiScience/Article/3...I pi 520a Comparison between simulated and experimental moisture content of spring onion at different height,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022053021/5f9077bc910d3d6e5816ba43/html5/thumbnails/168.jpg)
151
‘right
LOCATE ~246, xl 46, 0: PRINT CHR$(POO);
FOR count% = xl % + 1 TO x2% - 1: PRINT CHR$(205); : NEXT count%: PRINT CHR$( 188);
‘bottom
IF shadow = true THEN
COLOR fore.back%, back.back%
FOR count% = ~1% + 1 TO ~2% + 1: LOCATE count%, x2% + 1, 0: PRINT CHR$(176): NEXT count%
‘right shadow
LOCATEy2%+1,xl%+l,O
FOR count% = xl % + 1 TO x2%: PRINT CHR$( 176); : NEXT count%
‘bottom shadow
E N D I F
E N D S U B
SUB writeresults
displaytext 1, 80, 2, 25, ” “, ” Saving’, headdore%, head.back%
writetile = writefile + 1
IF tselect% = 2 THEN
WRITE X3, dryt * VEL
ELSE
WRITE 83, dryt
E N D I F
FOR N = U4TOTNOLSTEPU4
WRITE #3, INT(X(N) * 100 + .5) / 100, INT(TG(0, N) * 100 + .5) / 100, INT(MG(0, N) / (1 + MG(0, N)) *
10000+.5)/100
NEXT N
IF (tselect% = 2 AND INT(dryt * 100 + .5) / 100 < tend) OR (tselect% = 1 AND (AMC ) U8 OR PACDML < U9))
T H E N
WRITE #3, EF * 3.6 / Q5
WRITE #3, EH / Cl6
E N D I F
IF INT(dryt * 100 + ,5) / 100 >= tend OR (AMC < U8 OR PACDML > U9) OR tselect% > 2 THEN
WRITE X3, dryt
WRITE #3, AMCI, AGOI, TIM
WRITE #3, AMC, AGO, TJM
WRITE #3, PACDML, FT, INT((PEtotal / Q5) * 100 + .5) / 100
WRITE #3, INT((GA / HI * VOL / 3600 *CA*TH/Q6)*100+.5)/100,INT((GA/HI*VOL/3600*CA*
T4/Q6)*100+.5)/100,INT((FT*PS*3600/1000/Q5)*100+.5)/100
WRITE #3, INT((EH / Q6) * 100 + .5) / 100, INT(STX * 100 + .5) / 100, TH
WRITE X3, INT(T4 * 100 + .5) / 100, INT(PG * 100 + .5) / 100
OPEN “0’, #4, rdrive$ + “checkres”
WRITE #4, writefile
CLOSE #4
E N D I F
displaytext 1, 80, 2, 25, ” “, ” Simulating”, headdore%, head.back%
E N D S U B