Hybrid clubs: a feminist approach to peacebuilding in the ...
A Feminist Approach to Research
-
Upload
beatriz-montenegro -
Category
Documents
-
view
7 -
download
5
description
Transcript of A Feminist Approach to Research
Nurse Researcher
A feminist approach to research
Correspondence to
Leslie Geiiing PhD MA BSc(Hons)RN FRSA, Reader in ResearchEthics, Faculty of Health, SocialCare and Education, AngiiaRuskin University
Author guidelines
www.nurseresearcher.co.ui(
Leslie Gelling looks at the insights and challenges brought
up by methodological studies from a feminist perspective
Cite this article as: Gelling L (2013) A feminist approach to research. Nurse Researcher. 2 1 , 1 , 6-7.
Date of subnússion: July 29 2013. Date of acceptance: July 30 2013.
H^
FEMINIST RESEARCH focuses on the experiences ofwomen in natural social settings, where the aim is to'make women visible, raise their consciousness andempower them' (HoUoway and Wheeler 2013). Adoptinga feminist approach influences what questionsresearchers ask and how they think about their data,but it does not usually influence how data is managedor analysed. This edition of Nurse Researcher includestwo themed papers exploring issues around thecollection and analysis of qualitative data in researchprojects that have adopted a feminist approach.The first paper considers methodological issues ina feminist-informed study and the second paperdescribes how taking account of feminist ideologiesmight enhance interpretive interacüonism.
In the first paper, Blythe et al (2013) describefour challenges related to acting as an insiderresearcher in a study using a 'feminist-informedstorytelling research design' to explore the experiencesof Australian women providing long-term fostercare. The authors argue that this study was ideallysuited to a feminist approach because foster care,the focus of this research, is 'heavüy gendered' withwomen providing the majority of care. The challengesexplored are not unique to feminist research but arecommon to researchers adopting an insider approachto data collection.
While insider researchers often adopt or developinto an insider role, the lead researcher involvedin collecting data for this first themed paper wasfirmly embedded in the research setting because shealso had considerable experience as a foster parent.This can only have intensified the methodologicaland scientific challenges associated with being aninsider researcher and, it could be argued, make thisresearcher's personal circumstances a reason why sheshould not have been leading the research. Bl^ilie et al(2013) clearly considered this issue when suggestingthat the first of the four challenges for an insider
researcher relates to 'assumed understanding'. Theauthors argue that being a true insider, where thereis clearly a shared experience between the researcherand the research participant, can result in importantinformation being omitted during storytelling inthe participant's belief that the researcher alreadyunderstands the experience being investigated anddoes not, therefore, need to be told parts of the storybeing recounted. The strategy' adopted to counterthis challenge was to probe participants when theresearcher recognised that a participant was assumingunderstanding, demonstrated by phrases such as 'youknow what I mean'.
Researchers repeatedly face the challenge ofencouraging resecirch participants to share theirexperiences and perceptions of that experience asfreely as possible. This requires that researchersbalance the benefits of insider knowledge andunderstanding (reflexiNity) against the need to ensure'analytical objectivity'. In the example of insiderresearch presented in the first themed paper, it canbe argued that the lead researcher was too close tothe participants being researched and that creatingthe necessary balance was bound to be difficult inthis situation. What is not clear in reading this paperis whether this data coUection could have beenperformed as effectively by someone who did notshare this researcher's personal experiences. Also,might a researcher who did not share this experiencehave collected more informative data? Would they havefound more searching emd explanatory responses?
These researchers show both the advantages anddisadvantages of undertaking insider research but it isunclear how well they believe they balanced their rolesin this research. What is clear, however, is that researchinformed by feminist theory was the most meaningfulapproach for this research. It was also reassuring thatthe authors did not claim that the challenges theyexplored were unique to feminist-informed research.
September 2011 | Volume 21 | Number 1 1 RCN PUBLISHING / NURSE RESEARCHER
Commentary
In the second themed paper, Jefford and Sundín(2013) describe an adaptation of interpretiveinteracüonism, which they claim 'incorporates andhonors feminist values and principles'. The researchexample they use was a project undertaken to examineinteractions between midwives and women in thesecond stage of labour. As previously noted, adoptingfeminist approaches in research usually influenceshow researchers think about the research and the datacollected rather than how the data is collected andanalysed. The authors of this paper do not make thisdistinction and illustrate how they believe feministtheories can influence how research is conducted.
Research exploring interactions between midwivesand expectant mothers appear ideally suited to afeminist approach because the experience is oneexperienced by women. The authors, however, argueagainst this perspective by suggesting that practicesettings in delivery units are 'run by the traditionalbiomedical-focused, male-dominant profession'. Ifthis were the case then arguments about the need forfeminist-influenced research to support the oppressedand dominated gender are relevant. In this clinicalenvironment and in the current political climate,however, this argument for a feminist approach is lessthan convincing and is not supported by the literature.
Jefford and Sundin (2013) also argue that feministprinciples can be incorporated into aspects of researchmethodology. In the description of how the researchersachieved this, feminist theory' influenced the framingof the research question and the identification ofresearch participants, which seems whoUy appropriate.Less convincing, however, is how feminist theoryinfluenced the subsequent conduct of the researchor how the findings of the research would have beendifferent if the research had not been conducted usinga method influenced by feminist theories.
Feminist influences to research undoubtedly have acontribution to make in increasing our understandingof the worid. These approaches to research were areaction against positivism and traditional researchstrategies, which were perceived to be male-dominatedand oppressive of women (HoUoway cind Wheeler2013). Feminist researchers focused on researchendeavours that would raise issues of power andoppression. The aim was to generate new knowledgeand understanding to empower women. It isreasonable to rationalise the need for some researchon these grounds but it is unclecir how researchdesigns can be influenced by feminist theories, or ifthey need to be. Rigorous scientiflc approaches toresearch, data collection and analysis are importantwhatever the aims of the research.
The first themed paper in this issue highlightsmethodological issues of importance in a study
exploring the experiences of Australian women(Blythe et al 2013). The need for this research isclearly influenced by a feminist agenda but the designand conduct of that research was not influenced byfeminist theories. Existing options for collecting andanalysing data were sufficiently rigorous to allowresearchers to conduct the research. The findings ofthe research have potential to contribute knowledgeand understanding that wiU benefit women and can fitinto a feminist agenda.
The second themed paper also describesresearch undertaken from a feminist standpoint.Again the research is undertaken in the beliefthat knowledge gained wül improve the lives ofwomen. In contrast to the authors of the first paper,Jefford and Sundin (2013) suggest that the researchdesign can be influenced by feminist theories. Thisargument, and the description of how this wasachieved, is less than convincing and needs somefurther development.
Too little is written in the methodological literatureabout feminist influences on research decisionmaking or how feminist theories might influence theconduct of research. More also needs to be writtenabout how such issues have changed over time. Thesetwo themed papers have considered some of themethodological issues.
ReferencesBlythe S. Wilkes L, Jackson D, Halcomb E (2013) The challenge of being an insiderin storyteiling researcii. Nurse Researcher. 21,1,8-13.
Holloway I, Wheeler S (2013) Qualitative Research In Nursing And Healthcare.Oxford, WUey-Biadcwell
Jefford E, Sundin D (2013) Post-structural feminist interpretive interactionism.Nurse Researclier. 21.1,14-22.
ber l ^I RCN PUBLISHING / NURSE RESEARCHER September 2011 | Volume 21 | Number
Copyright of Nurse Researcher is the property of RCN Publishing Company and its contentmay not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyrightholder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles forindividual use.