OR

IGIN

AL

RES

EAR

CH

372

Corresponding author: Éder Kröeff Cardoso – Universidade Federal do Pará – Av. Gastão Mazeron, 265, ap 301, Medianeira – Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil – CEP 90880-370 E-mail: edercard@live.com – Financing source: Nothing to declare – Conflict of interest: Nothing to declare – Presentation: Dec. 2015 – Accepted for publication: Oct. 2016. Approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre – UFCSPA under number 1492/11.

DOI: 10.1590/1809-2950/15789423042016

1Graduate program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA) – Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.2Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA) – Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.3Scholarship holder of DTI – Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS).

ABSTRACT | The model of brace developed consists

of a neoprene kneepad that has an inflatable cuff

positioned over the popliteal region of the knee. It

provides stimuli on joint structures as well as a better

biomechanical alignment during the stance phase of the

gait. The aim of this study was to quantify the changes

and adaptations induced by gait training with the use

of orthotic device in hemiparetic patients. A quasi-

experimental before-after study was held with twelve

adult patients with hemiparesis due to cerebrovascular

accident. The peaks of plantar pressure were the markers

used to compare the three moments of the study: the

baseline, when they were using the brace, and post-gait

training. After the sessions of gait retraining with the

orthosis, the redistribution of plantar pressures showed

increased symmetry during the stance phase, mainly by

reducing the pressure on the paretic forefoot (p=0.024)

and by the increase in the rearfoot in the paretic side

(p=0.010). In addition, these changes were associated

with a decrease in pressure on all regions of the foot

not affected, especially in the rearfoot after training. The

results of the study suggest a change in the gait pattern

of participants after using the brace. There has been

greater symmetry of the values of the plantar pressure

peaks when the affected side was compared with the

nonaffected side. Training with the brace helps in the

rehabilitation process, since it provides baropodometric

372

values approaching the normal pattern of plantar

distribution.

Keywords | Stroke; Gait; Orthotic Devices.

RESUMO | O modelo de brace desenvolvido consiste em

uma joelheira de neoprene que apresenta um balonete

inflável posicionado sobre a região poplítea do joelho.

Ele proporciona estímulos sobre estruturas articulares,

bem como um melhor alinhamento biomecânico durante

a fase de apoio da marcha. O objetivo do estudo foi

quantificar as alterações e adaptações induzidas pelo

treinamento da marcha com a utilização do dispositivo

ortótico em pacientes hemiparéticos. Realizou-se um

estudo quase-experimental do tipo antes e depois com

doze pacientes adultos com hemiparesia decorrente

de acidente vascular encefálico. Os picos de pressão

plantares foram os marcadores utilizados para comparar

os três momentos do estudo: na linha de base, quando

estivessem utilizando o brace e após o treinamento da

marcha. Após as sessões de reeducação da marcha com

auxílio da órtese, a redistribuição das pressões plantares

evidenciou aumento na simetria durante a fase de apoio,

principalmente pela diminuição da pressão sobre o antepé

parético (p = 0,024) e pelo aumento no retropé no lado

parético (p = 0,010). Além disso, estas alterações foram

associadas a uma diminuição da pressão sobre todas as

regiões do pé não afetado, especialmente no retropé no

A different brace model to retrain hemiparetic gait with genu recurvatum: effects on plantar pressure distributionUm modelo diferente de brace para a reeducação da marcha hemiparética com genu recurvatum: efeitos sobre a distribuição das pressões plantaresUn modelo distinto de rodillera en la rehabilitación de la marcha hemiparética con genu recurvatum: efectos sobre la distribución de las presiones plantaresÉder Kröeff Cardoso1, Alexandre Severo do Pinho2,3, Marcelo Faria Silva1,2, Luis Henrique Telles da Rosa1,2

Cardoso et al. Brace to retrain hemiparetic gait

373

momento de pós-treinamento. Os resultados do estudo sugerem

uma mudança no padrão de marcha dos participantes após a

utilização do brace. Houve maior simetria dos valores dos picos

de pressão plantares quando se comparou o lado afetado com

o não afetado. O treino com o brace contribui no processo de

reabilitação, uma vez que forneceu valores baropodométricos

que se aproximaram ao padrão normal de distribuição plantar.

Descritores |  Acidente Vascular Cerebral; Marcha; Aparatos

Ortopédicos.

RESUMEN | En una rodillera de neoprene se desarrolló un tipo

de rodillera ortopédica, que lleva un manguito inflable, puesto en

la región poplítea de la rodilla, y que les proporciona estímulos

a las estructuras articulares, así como mejora la alienación

biomecánica durante la fase de apoyo de la marcha. El propósito

del estudio es cuantificar las alteraciones y adaptaciones

producidas por el entrenamiento con este dispositivo ortótico en

pacientes hemiparéticos. Se trata de un estudio casi experimental

de tipo antes y después, del cual participaron doce adultos

hemiparéticos debido al accidente cerebrovascular. Se utilizaron

como marcadores los picos de presión plantar para comparar

tres momentos del estudio: el inicio del estudio; el momento en

que utilizaban la rodillera y tras entrenar la marcha. Después

de las sesiones de rehabilitación de la marcha con ayuda de la

rodillera, en la redistribución de las presiones plantares ocurrió un

aumento en la simetría durante la fase de apoyo, principalmente

disminución de la presión sobre el antepié parético (p=0,024) y

aumento en el retropié en el lado parético (p=0,010). Además,

estas alteraciones se las asociaron a la disminución de la presión

sobre todas las regiones del pie no alterado, especialmente en el

retropié en el momento posterior al tratamiento. Los resultados

del estudio muestran un cambio en el patrón de marcha de los

participantes después de utilizar este tipo de rodillera. Hubo una

mayor simetría de los valores de los picos de presión plantar

cuando se comparó el lado alterado con el no alterado. El

entrenamiento con este tipo de rodillera ayudó en el proceso de

rehabilitación, puesto que presentó valores baropodométricos

cerca del patrón prestablecido de distribución plantar.

Palabras clave | Accidente Cerebrovascular; Marcha; Aparatos

Ortopédicos.

INTRODUCTION

Retraining the gait after a stroke represents one of the greatest challenges of the rehabilitation process, once the locomotion allows greater autonomy and has direct impact on the levels of functionality1. About half of the stroke survivors exhibit motor deficiencies, such as muscle weakness, abnormal muscle tone, and sensory disabilities, often combined with spasticity or contractures of muscles of the paretic lower limbs2. The hemiparetic gait is characterized by changes in the kinematic and spatial-temporal parameters. During the stance phase, the hyperextension of the knee often occurs, which is known as genu recurvatum2.

From the biomechanical point of view, the genu recurvatum is characterized by a ground reaction force vector that passes exactly in front of the knee. In patients with quadriceps weakness, this phenomenon raises a knee extensor moment, avoiding the fall in flexion during the midstance, as a strategy for greater stability in the lower limb. Besides being a walking aesthetic problem, it can cause pain and therefore limit the autonomy of the patient in daily life activities3. It can be caused due to various phenomena, such as weakness or spasticity of the quadriceps muscle, spasticity and/

or contracture of the plantarflexors, and proprioceptive deficits2. The profile of plantar pressure distribution of patients with stroke proves to be very different from what it is observed in healthy individuals4. In this sense, the measurement of plantar pressures quantifies the degree of commitment of the hemiparetic patient and assesses objectively the effectiveness of the intervention with an orthotic device in the rehabilitation process2.

The traditional approach of locomotor training involves walking on the ground or on the treadmill. Thus, a better control over the knee joint affected can be obtained through orthotic resources that seek to facilitate a motor response desirable and inhibit the abnormal primitive motor activities5. The orthosis used in this study was developed to retrain the gait and minimize the genu recurvatum after considering the neurophysiological and biochemical aspects1. Accordingly, we considered that the application of moderate pressure on structures of the musculoskeletal system could change the strategies of muscle recruitment, to promote better alignment of the knee, as well as to contribute to the functional recovery of the gait without blocking or limiting the joint motion completely. Consequently, the plantar pressures could also be changed and measured by baropodometry. Thus,

Fisioter Pesqui. 2016;23(4):372-380

374

the aim of this study was to assess the distribution of plantar pressures during the walking of patients with hemiparesis after using a different brace to train the gait of hemiparetic people with genu recurvatum.

METHODOLOGY

Quasi-experimental before-after study. Twelve (12) adult patients who have had a stroke participated, they received physical therapy follow-up in a clinic. Inclusion criteria were the presence of hemiparesis after stroke with evolution between six and 24 months, ability to walk without auxiliary devices, and presence of genu recurvatum during the gait midstance phase. Exclusion criteria were the conditions that obstructed the assessment and training with the orthosis, as well as the presence of fixed deformities or contractures in lower limbs and moderate-to-severe compromises of cognitive, perceptual, of attention or language nature. This first screening was performed by one of the physical therapists responsible for the study through physical and functional assessment and by data from patient records.

The researchers developed the orthotic device used. It has four neoprene strips fixed with hook and loop tape above and below the patella, gathered in the posterior region through neoprene and leather fabrics (Figure 1A). It also has, on the popliteal fossa, a rubber inflatable cuff wrapped with neoprene, which must be positioned in a way that ensures more pressure on that local (Figure 1B).

The pressure of the cuff was established at 0.35 kg/cm2 with a calibration sensor so that it could offer a moderate degree of pressure on the popliteal region. The hook and loop tapes on the anterior surface of the thigh and leg were adjusted according to the patient’s response, they should be comfortable and securely fixed.

After receiving explanations about the study and signing an informed consent form, the first gait assessment was held. The flowchart of assessments and training was divided into three moments. At first, we held an assessment of plantar pressure measurement. The records of plantar pressures were collected through dynamic baropodometry. To obtain the baropodometry data, we used a digital baropodometer of the pressure platform type of the brand Novel, Emed-X model (690mmx403mmx190mm) resolution of 4 sensor/cm2, maximum sampling rate of 100Hz.

The platform was positioned in the center of a runway of Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) of approximately 7 meters in length. We asked the patient to walk naturally and barefoot in self-selected speed on the runway. The patient started the gait with parallel feet from the mark previously delineated, allowing the implementation of the third step on the platform, according to the three-step protocol6. Each individual walked five times the path to become familiar with the procedures and, after this period, the software was enabled to carry out the acquisitions. The Peak Plantar Pressure in kilopascals (kPa) –maximum pressure recorded in specific plantar areas – of four regions of the foot (rearfoot, midfoot, forefoot, and toes) was established through the Novel Scientifc 12.3.30 software.

Figure 1: Orthosis for gait rehabilitation. (A) lateral view of the neoprene strips above and below the patella; (B) greater detail of the position of the inflatable cuff on the popliteal region (arrow)

Three records were acquired from the affected foot and from the nonaffected foot on the platform. At moment 1, the orthosis was not used, this first assessment served as a baseline, that is, the standard baseline of the participants’ gait. After an interval of 30 minutes for rest, at moment 2, this same procedure of baropodometric assessment was also carried out with the patient wearing the orthosis.

Cardoso et al. Brace to retrain hemiparetic gait

375

The day after that assessment, patients began four weeks of gait training with the orthosis under the supervision and observation of a physical therapist who belongs to the group of authors of this study. Twice a week, for five weeks, before the sessions in the physical therapy clinic, the patients who participated in the study were asked to walk with self-selected speed on level ground, a hall with 50 meters in length, wearing the orthosis to retrain the gait in the affected side during fifteen minutes. The amount of interventions was based on a study that showed significant and lasting effects on the control of recurvatum in the gait after 10 electrogoniometric biofeedback sessions7. On the first day following the tenth session of training, we held the moment 3 to assess the plantar pressures without the orthosis.

Data processing and analysis

For the statistical analysis, we calculated the average and the standard deviation of both feet of the variables of Peak Plantar Pressure (maximum pressure recorded in the plantar specific areas: rearfoot, midfoot, forefoot, and toes). Thus, eight independent analyses were performed, aiming to compare the situations without brace, with brace, and post-training, one for each limb and regions of the foot. The values of peak pressure in these areas of both feet were compared with the affected and nonaffected sides in different moments of the gait assessment. These comparisons were made using parametric tests (ANOVA for repeated measures) or non-parametric tests (Friedman), according to the presence or absence of normal distribution of the data. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the normality of the data. The version 17 of the program SPSS® (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Inc., Chicago, USA) was used to analyze the data. The significance level adopted was p≤0.05.

RESULTS

From a total of twelve hemiparetic patients, the average age was 61.5±10.7 years, 7 of them were male. The average time post-stroke was 12.9±5.6 months. The graphical representations of the variables of peak pressure in the four regions of the feet on the sides affected (AF) and nonaffected (N-AF) with and

without the orthosis in the paretic knee are exposed in Figures 2, 3, and 4.

Moment 1 (baseline)

In the rearfoot, the plantar pressure behavior showed significantly different average values on the affected side compared with the nonaffected side with 209.65 (SD 51.38) and 349.16 (SD 120.68), respectively, (p=0.003). As well as on the region of the toes, the average values were 229.51 (SD 107.87) and 335.32 (SD 180.69), (p=0.004), with the largest distributed pressures on the nonaffected side.

Moment 2 (wearing the brace)

Comparing the affected side with the nonaffected side, the orthosis did not show changes in the pattern identified in the baseline. Differences in the pressures of the rearfoot remained with 215.55 (SD 50.52) and 322.62 (SD 109.16), (p=0.005), as well as in the toes with 260.44 (SD 118.15) and 327.92 (SD 133.06), (p=0.004) being the biggest pressures presented on the healthy side.

When comparing the AF wearing the orthosis with its baseline values, we identified increase in peak plantar pressure in the region of the toes, going from 229.51 (SD 107.87) to 260.44 (SD 118.15), (p=0.007) and a decreasing trend in the pressure on the forefoot on the paretic side, going from 287.53 kPa to 265.41 kPa. The healthy side showed decreased values in all regions, in particular on the rearfoot, 349.16 (SD 120.68) to 322.62 (SD 109.16), (p=0.041).

Moment 3 (gait training)

The pressure peaks, comparing the AF with the N-AF side, maintained the differences similar to those observed at baseline. In comparison with the baseline data obtained after the training, the region of the paretic forefoot showed significant reduction of peak pressure, going from 287.53 (SD 150.18) to 243.76 (SD 128.62), (p=0.024), while the region of the rearfoot presented a tendency to increase. Also, all the regions of the N-AF foot, rearfoot, midfoot, forefoot, and toes have demonstrated reductions in plantar pressures, however only the rearfoot has significant value going from 349.16 (SD 120.68) to 307.83 (SD 104.82), (p=0.010).

Fisioter Pesqui. 2016;23(4):372-380

376

350p=0.003

AF

Toes

N-AFAF

Forefoot

N-AFAF

Midfoot

Without use

N-AFAF

Rearfoot

N-AF

p=0.004

p=0.005

AF

Toes

N-AFAF

Forefoot

N-AFAF

MidfootWith use

Post-training

N-AFAF

Rearfoot

N-AF

p=0.004

p=0.007

AF

Toes

10 30 60 100 200150 300

N-AFAF

Forefoot

N-AFAF

Midfoot

N-AFAF

Rearfoot

N-AF

p=0.005

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Figure 2: Graphical representations of the peak pressure variables compared between the affected side with the unaffected side without orthosis, with orthosis, and after training in the different areas of the foot

Cardoso et al. Brace to retrain hemiparetic gait

377

350

300

250200150100

500

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Without

ToesWith

Without

Forefoot

A�ected

Nona�ected

WithWithout

MidfootWith

Without

RearfootWith

Without

ToesWith

Without

ForefootWith

Without

MidfootWith

Without

RearfootWith

p=0.041

p=0.007

10 30 60 100 200150 300

10 30 60 100 200150 300

Figure 3: Graphical representations of the variables of peak pressure compared without and with the use of orthosis on the side affected and nonaffected in different regions of the foot at moments 1 and 2

350

300250200150100

500

300

250

200

150

100

500

Nouse

Toes

PostTr No

usePost

Tr Nouse

PostTr No

usePost

TrForefoot

A�ected

Nona�ected

MidfootRearfoot

ToesForefoot

MidfootRearfoot

p=0.010

p=0.024

10 30 60 100 200150 300

10 30 60 100 200150 300

Nouse

PostTr No

usePost

Tr Nouse

PostTr No

usePost

Tr

Figure 4: Graphical representations of the variables of peak pressure comparing the baseline (no use) with the data after training (post Tr) on the nonaffected and affected side in different areas of the foot

Fisioter Pesqui. 2016;23(4):372-380

378

DISCUSSION

The pattern of contact with the ground of the patients assessed in our study showed a predominance of higher peak pressure on the forefoot paretic region. This aspect can be noted when comparing the pressure areas in three-dimensional format of the initial contact of a hemiparetic patient with those of a healthy individual. Figure 5 shows an example of comparison between a paretic foot with that of a healthy individual. Insufficient dorsiflexion and spasticity of plantiflexors can explain this form of “heel strike” in hemiparetic patients4,8.

When comparing the values of pressure peaks between the affected and the nonaffected side, smaller values were observed on the region of the rearfoot and toes on the affected side without the orthosis, constituting the basal pattern of the patients. The distribution of the peak plantar pressure, during the gait without the orthosis for gait rehabilitation, showed patterns similar to other studies involving baropodometry in hemiparetic people8,9-12. The dynamic plantar pressure of hemiplegic patients shows, on the affected side, a change of initial contact, from the rearfoot to the forefoot area, an increase in the lateral plantar stance, a limited bearing, and a reduced or absent heel-off movement in terminal stance14.

On the affected side, the pressures are mainly displaced on the forefoot, on the basis of spasticity of triceps surae, on the N-AF side, however, there is a greater transfer of stance on the foot not affected in patients with severe motor impairment15. The peak of reduced pressure at the base of the third metatarsal, according to studies, denotes a higher transverse arch of the forefoot: that would be connected to the greater spasticity of the intrinsic foot muscles12. The comparison of peak pressure between the nonaffected and affected side of nine hemiparetic patients showed that the nonaffected side had the highest peaks of pressure, while on the affected side, the forefoot and the lateral plantar arch showed greater values8. This can occur due to equinism and spasticity, which commonly occur in hemiparetic patients, as well as due to coordination disturbance, sensory alteration, and insufficient transfer of weight on the paretic side11. The analysis of distribution in peak plantar pressure of 25 hemiparetic patients and of 31 healthy patients showed reduction of peak pressure on the sides affected, mainly in the medial metatarsal area of hemiparetic patients13. Other studies have also observed that the distribution of plantar pressures of hemiparetic patients showed low-pressure peak around the foot of the affected side12.

10 30 60 100 200150 300

10 30 60 100 200150 300

Higher peakpressure onthe rearfoot

Higher peakpressure onthe forefoot

Figure 5: Forms of visualization of pressure distribution in three-dimensional pattern of peaks of plantar pressures during the initial contact of the heel. (A) characterizes the gait pattern in normal individual19. (B) presents example of a hemiparetic patient with genu recurvatum

Cardoso et al. Brace to retrain hemiparetic gait

379

In the second part of the study, the asymmetries found in the baseline remained, from a comparison of the affected side with the orthosis versus the nonaffected side. Comparing the peaks of baseline pressure with the ones of paretic knee use, some changes were observed: on the affected side, the region of the toes showed more pressure against the ground, a tendency to decrease the pressure on the forefoot and increase on the rearfoot. All nonaffected regions of the foot showed decreased peak pressure, mainly in the region of the rearfoot. Studies with analysis of normal patterns of plant distribution consider that an ordered sequence of events occurs, during the stance, starting by the heel, heel and forefoot strike, only the forefoot and, finally, forefoot and toes. In this final moment of contact with the ground, the weight is being transferred to the other foot with heel strike14. The reduction of the pressure on the rearfoot of the N-AF side after the training can be attributed to a better motor control, conferred by a better angle of the calcaneus entry and subsequent softening in the heel strike, observed in better distribution of plantar pressures in the stance phase on the AF side.

The verification of the effects of the orthosis on the gait, at moment 3, showed positive functional results. In the forefoot region of the affected side, where usually the highest peak pressures occur in the hemiparetic foot12, there was a significant reduction of the values after the training. On the nonaffected side, the peak plantar pressure decreases in all regions, in particular in the rearfoot. The reduction of the pressures on the foot on that side, both when using the orthosis, and post-training, suggest that the body weight is being distributed more to the paretic side. Hemiparetic individuals transfer approximately 70% of the total weight on the nonaffected lower limb16. The postural alignment and symmetry in transfers of weight, in patients with stroke, and its relationship with functional skills, of balance and gait are essential for a successful rehabilitation17.

Irregularities and asymmetries in the distribution patterns of plantar pressures between the limbs reflect a disturbance in the articular movement9,10,18. Possibly the decreased dorsal flexion by spasticity of the triceps surae contributes with the highest peaks of pressure on the forefoot on the affected side. The difficulties in the transfer of weight from the rearfoot to the forefoot can be due to genu recurvatum, tilted uterus and insufficient hip extension on the paretic side18.

The results of the study revealed that the orthosis developed must necessarily be accompanied by a period

of adjustment and gait training to obtain better results at the level of the forefoot. We found that only the use itself does not cause significant changes in the pattern of plantar pressures. After ten sessions, there was more adequate distribution of plantar pressure to the rearfoot on the affected side and greater symmetry in relation to the N-AF side. On the nonaffected side, the pressure, which was greater in the rearfoot, showed a decreasing trend in the pressure peaks in this region after the training. We can therefore infer that training with the orthosis contributes to the rehabilitation process, since it provides favorable biomechanical alignment in the joint, and thus a best performance of knee flexors that are weaker in the genu recurvatum. In addition, it can provide proprioceptive input, giving the patient a feedback about the knee hyperextension, informing the patient of the need to correct this unwanted movement.

Among the limitations of the study, in addition to the reduced sample, we highlight the lack of a control group to document normal developments with the conventional physical therapy. In an upcoming assessment, in addition to the incorporation of placebo group, it would be important to obtain baropodometry data associated with electromyography and/or kinematic analysis to quantify the degree of genu recurvatum at different speeds, correlating the muscular behavior with changes in plantar pressure and in kinematic parameters.

When considering the mechanical characteristics of the brace, we understand that it proves to be a differentiated management of the gait with genu recurvatum, compared with the other existing resources. This device does not restrict the movement of the knee in a fixed angle, but “reports” to the patient by means of tactile and proprioceptive stimuli the occurrence of hyperextension during the midstance. This study suggests a better gait pattern in the participants by presenting greater symmetry in plantar pressure peak values, i.e., a contact of the foot with the ground closer to normal. We can thus infer that the training with the orthosis can help hemiparetic individuals to obtain better motor control and biomechanical alignment of the knee during the gait.

REFERENCES

1. Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL, Farina D, et al. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8(66):2-19. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-66.

Fisioter Pesqui. 2016;23(4):372-380

380

2. Boudarham J, Zory R, Genet F, Vigné G, Bensmail D, Roche N, et al. Effects of a knee-ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanical characteristics of paretic and non-paretic limbs in hemiplegic patients with genu recurvatum. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013;28(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.09.007.

3. Bleyenheuft C, Bleyenheuft Y, Hanson P, Deltombe T. Treatment of genu recurvatum in hemiparetic adult patients: a systematic literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;53:189-99. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2010.01.001.

4. Femery V, Moretto P, Renaut H, Thévenon A. Spasticité et distribution des pressions plantaires chez des enfants atteints d’hémiplégie cérébrale infantile. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2001;44(1):26-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6054(00)00060-X.

5. Isakov E, Mizrahi J, Onna I, Susak Z. The control of genu recurvatum by combining the Swedish knee-cage and an ankle-foot brace. Disabil Rehabil. 1992;14(4):187-91.

6. Robinson CC, Detânico RC, Zaro MA, Andrade MC. Comparação entre dois protocolos de baropodometria dinâmica utilizando plataforma de pressão. Tecnicouro. 2010;249:70-4.

7. Basaglia N, Mazzini N, Boldrini P, Bacciglieri P, Contenti E, Ferraresi G. Biofeedback treatment of genu-recurvatum using an electrogoniometric device with an acoustic signal. One-year follow-up. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1989;21(3):125-30.

8. Wong AM, Pei YC, Hong WH, Chung CY, Lau YC, Chen CP. Foot contact pattern analysis in hemiplegic stroke patients: an implication for neurologic status determination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(10):1625-30.

9. Valentini FA, Granger B, Hennebelle DS, Eythrib N, Robain G. Repeatability and variability of baropodometric and spatio-temporal gait parameters – results in healthy subjects and in stroke patients. Neurophysiol Clin. 2011;41(4):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.08.004.

10. Boza R, Duarte E, Belmonte R, Marco E, Muniesa JM, Tejero M, et al. Estudio baropodométrico en el hemipléjico vascular:

relación con la discapacidad, equilibrio y capacidad de marcha. Rehabilitación (Madr. Internet). 2007;41(1):3-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7120(07)75350-1.

11. Schuster RC, Zadra K, Luciano M, Polese JC, Mazzola D, Sander I, et al. Análise da pressão plantar em pacientes com acidente vascular encefálico. Rev Neurociênc. 2008;16(3):179-83.

12. Meyring S, Diehl RR, Milani TL, Hennig EM, Berlit P. Dynamic plantar pressure distribution measurements in hemiparetic patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997;12(1):60-5.

13. Titianova EB, Pitkänen K, Pääkkönen A, Sivenius J, Tarkka IM. Gait characteristics and functional ambulation profile in patients with chronic unilateral stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(10):778-86. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000087490.74582.E0.

14. Perry J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. New Jersey: SLACK Incorporated; 1992.

15. Gaviria M, D’Angeli M, Chavet P, Pelissier J, Peruchon E, Rabischong P. Plantar dynamics of hemiplegic gait: a methodological approach. Gait Posture. 1996;4(4):297-305. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(95)01055-6.

16. Shumwaycook A, Anson D, Haller S. Postural sway biofeedback: its effect on reestablishing stance stability in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1988;69(6):395-400.

17. Trindade APNT, Barboza MA, Oliveira FB, Borges APO. Influência da simetria e transferência de peso nos aspectos motores após acidente vascular cerebral. Rev Neurociênc. 2011;19(1):61-7.

18. Robain G, Valentini F, Renard-Deniel S, Chennevelle JM, Piera JB. A baropodometric parameter to analyze the gait of hemiparetic patients: the path of center of pressure. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2006;49(8):609-13. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2006.05.002.

19. Pinzur MS, Sherman R, DiMonte-Levine P, Trimble J. Gait changes in adults onset hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med. 1987;66(5):228-37.