A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction...
-
Upload
nicholas-socrates -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction...
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
1/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Faculty of Economics & Management
Commercial Sciences & Management Field of Study
Master of International Business Economics & ManagementDegree Programme
Confidential
Company Project
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the
UK Construction Industry
Master Thesis by
Samantha MANNIEX
Submitted for the Degree of
Master of International
Business Economics and Management
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
2/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Academic Year 2009 - 2010
Table of Contents
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UKConstruction Industry 5
1 - Introduction 5The Global Threat of Climate Change 5
The United Kingdoms Response 6
2016: The Zero-Carbon Target 6
BRE and The Green Guide to Specification 7
The Company: Krete Sustain Systems Ltd 7
PEST Analysis The External Environment of Krete Sustain Systems Ltd 10
Political Factors 10
Economic Factors 10Socio-cultural Factors 10
Technological Factors 11
Project Methodology 11
General Research Questions 14
Specific Research Objectives 15
Project Overview 15
2 - Literature Review 172.1 - Introduction 17
Definitions 17
Call to Action on Sustainability: The Brundtland Report 18
The Importance of Materials 19Embodied Energy and Full Life Cycle Analysis 20
Potential Flaws in the Code for Sustainable Homes 21
Cost of Ownership and Full Life Cycle 22
Limitations of Existing Environmental Assessment Tools 23
Zero Carbon Homes in 2016 24
Concluding Comments 25
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
3/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
3 Legislation Discussion 27Introduction 27
The Climate Change Act 2008 27
The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan 28The Code for Sustainable Homes 30
The Green Guide to Specification 31
Concluding Comments 32
4 Primary Research 33Introduction 33
Choice of research methodology 33
Presentation of Survey Results 35
Discussion of Results 37
Concluding Comments 40
5 - Competitor Comparison 41
Introduction 41The Use of Plastics in Building 41
Comparison of RoofKrete with five international waterproofing membrane systems 42
Cement Products and Pollution 47
Application of RoofKrete 47
Concluding Comments 48
Embodied Energy 49
Introduction 49
Reducing Energy Consumption in the Building Industry 50
Embodied Energy Comparison by Product 52
Embodied Energy of Transport (to UK) Cradle to Site 53
Embodied Energy of Application 53
Embodied Energy of Disposal 55Concluding Comments 55
6 - Discussion 59Recommendations for Krete Sustain Systems Ltd 61
Improvements of RoofKrete 62
7 - Conclusion 64Research Questions and Objectives 64
Summary of main findings 65
Contributions to Knowledge 66
Prospects for Future Research 67
8 - List of References 68
9 - Appendices 72Questionnaire blank copy 72
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
4/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing
Systems in the UK Construction Industry
1 - Introduction
The Global Threat of Climate Change
For many years environmental scientists have been warning of the imminent dangers of
climate change. An increase of certain gases in the atmosphere has caused the planet to warm
up by 0.74 degrees C in the last 100 years (Act on CO2, 2010). Although this might seem like
only a minor increase, it is still enough to upset the Earths delicate balance and cause
dramatic changes in global weather patterns. Heat waves, floods and droughts are just a few
of climate changes serious effects. The scientific community consistently agrees on two main
points: firstly, that the actions of human beings have directly caused climate change, and
secondly, that we need to make drastic changes to our behaviour immediately, otherwisematters will become much worse (Act on CO2, 2010).
Global decision makers began to seriously heed the scientists warnings only in the last two
decades. Long-term changes, such as shifts in rainfall patterns and declines in Arctic sea-ice,
all follow the predicted pattern of climate change and unmistakeably the result of increased
human activity (Act on CO2, 2010). Now governments around the world are implementing
schemes that are designed to tackle the threat of climate change head-on. These schemes
range from carbon credit trading, to the total revamping of traditional forms of energy use,
which means replacing fossil fuels with renewable forms of energy. Wind farms,
hydroelectric power and solar panels are well known examples, and new green technologies
are constantly under development. The goal is to create a sustainable planet where future
generations can enjoy a quality of life similar to ours today. However, the human race first
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
5/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
needs to ensure that it can undo most of the environmental damage that begun during the time
of the Industrial Revolution (NOAA Research, 2010). Tackling climate change is the biggest
part of this crucial challenge.
The United Kingdoms Response
Many countries have committed significant time and resources to finding climate change
solutions. In particular, the United Kingdom has been at the forefront of this movement,
leading the way by setting ambitious environmental targets. Especially important is the UK
governments Low Carbon Transition Plan, (see appendices) a roadmap outlining a plan to
make the UK a low-carbon nation. According to this plan, the goal is to reduce carbon
emissions by 34% on 1990 levels by the year 2020 (The Low Carbon Transition Plan, 2009).
The Low Carbon Transition Plan provides a detailed examination of main industry sectors.
For each one, it discusses the proposed carbon cutting changes and how they will affect daily
life and work. The building industry is a major player in this strategy and the transition plan
devotes an entire section to it, Transforming our homes and communities (The Low Carbon
Transition Plan, 2009).
This clearly shows the role the building sector plays in making the UK one of the worlds
leading low carbon nations. As previously mentioned, the UK has developed some ambitious
goals to show its commitment to tackling the worlds environmental problems. These goals
cannot be reached without the cooperation of the building industry. One particular goal
involves the UKs housing stock, and is outlined in the next section.
2016: The Zero-Carbon Target
In 2016, all new homes in the UK will be zero-carbon. This will be measured by the Code for
Sustainable Homes (the Code), which is a key focus of this project and will be addressed in
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
6/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
more detail during subsequent chapters. Previously, there have been a number of approved
international systems for rating the sustainability of buildings. However, the government has
recognised the need for greater consistency and simplicity to encourage the UK construction
industry to adopt an entirely new approach to building (UK Green Building Council, 2010).
The Code was launched in December 2006, and introduced as a voluntary standard in
England from 2007. In 2008 it became mandatory to rate all new homes on the Codes scale,
regardless of the actual score, simply so that home-owners would better understand their
propertys environmental impact. However, from 2016 onwards it will become mandatory for
all new homes to reach level 6 (zero-carbon) on the Code scale. A similar target is planned
for non-domestic buildings, such as offices, schools and hospitals. However, the more diverse
and complicated nature of these buildings means that they require further research by the UK-GBC and other industry experts. As a result, the zero-carbon target for non-domestic
buildings has been set for 2019 (UK Green Building Council, 2010).
BRE and The Green Guide to Specification
The Building Research Establishment (BRE) maintains a directory of green construction
firms, known as the Green Guide to Specification, which is an important reference source for
architects when specifying suitable materials for sustainable building projects. Membership of
this directory can present a significant opportunity for a small to medium sized sustainable
building company to increase its business and improve its national visibility.
The Company: Krete Sustain Systems Ltd
The idea for this project came from an awareness of the increasing global relevance of
sustainability, combined with an existing interest in current affairs and environmental issues. I
met the managing director of Krete Sustain Systems (Dr Jenkins) through personal
networking and persuaded the company to allow me to write a thesis on sustainable
waterproofing membranes. The benefit for the company would be that my research would
help the company to better understand current sustainability issues, and potentially create
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
7/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
future business opportunities. During October 2009 the managing director and I discussed
how a research project could help the company better understand the marketing possibilities
of focusing on sustainability. The managing director and I thought that the present
international attention on environmental issues would provide a suitable backdrop for
increased marketing of Kretes product. Now is a perfect time to highlight the green and
sustainable characteristics of Krete Sustain Systems flagship product, the waterproof
construction membrane known as RoofKrete System 4 (hereafter referred to as
RoofKrete).
RoofKrete has been used on various British construction projects over the last thirty years. Its
main applications are on flat roofs and balconies, but it has also been used in more diverseprojects such as: a buried earth shelter in Tintagel, Cornwall, boat building, and gridshell
construction (Krete Sustain Systems Ltd, 2009). A gridshell is a curved structure usually
made from timber, which is also an extremely sustainable material. However, extra materials
are required to make a timber structure waterproof, which is why RoofKrete became the
perfect choice for the Downland Gridshell project (The Architecture Ensemble, 2002). In
addition to being fully waterproof, RoofKrete is also highly durable and carries a thirty-year
warranty. University tests have suggested that the product is likely to outlast the life of the
building (Krete Sustain Systems Ltd, 2009). RoofKrete has been used on many roofs around
the south of England during the last thirty years, and Krete Sustain Systems Ltd can now use
these successful projects as evidence to prove its durability claims for RoofKrete and increase
the products credibility. The company has also won some major awards, such as the
Classroom of the Future Award from Devon County Council in 1992, the Architects Journal
Award in 1995 for the Downland Gridshell project (Dawson, 2002), and the Millennium
Products Award from The Design Council/previous Prime Minister Tony Blair (The Design
Council, 2010). More recently, RoofKrete has won the EcoHouse award from the Daily
Telegraph/Home Building and Renovation Magazine (Krete Sustain Systems Ltd, 2009).
These awards suggest that RoofKrete has already gained a certain level of recognition among
experts in the UK.
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
8/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Extensive laboratory testing at the universities of Bath and Portsmouth has proven that
RoofKrete has the durability attributes required to make it a suitable choice for long-lasting
and strong buildings (Krete Sustain Systems, 2010). Additionally, the product has already
been proven capable of considerable longevity. Furthermore, the raw materials used to make
RoofKrete are highly green and can be sourced locally almost anywhere in the world. This
considerably reduces the transportation-related embodied energy of the final product, and
means that it could be easily manufactured in almost any country (Krete Sustain Systems,
2010).
As part of this research project, a comparison will be produced showing how RoofKrete
performs against its main competitors. This comparison will show how the components ofRoofKrete (sand and Portland cement) have superior sustainability ratings than those of
major competing products. Cost is also an important consideration, and when comparing
costs, it must be noted that the life expectancy of a RoofKrete flat roof far exceeds that of its
competitors, and therefore the associated maintenance costs will also be lower. Krete Sustain
Systems Ltd refers to this situation as fit and forget, and identifies it as one of RoofKretes
major assets (Krete Sustain Systems, 2010).
The company and I were aware that the UK government had recently released a number of
sustainability directives, and were therefore confident that we could attract attention within
the industry by making an analysis, aimed mainly at architects, which compared the
sustainable features of RoofKrete with its main competitors. In February the managing
director and I attended a non-domestic buildings task force workshop run by the UK Green
Building Council. The aim of this event was to gather opinions on the content and direction of
the non-domestic zero-carbon initiative from a range of industry experts. We believed that
this knowledge would help us to show how RoofKrete is suitable for meeting the design
needs that will result from future changes in UK sustainable building policy. In future, it is
hoped that RoofKrete will be the first choice for architects when they specify sustainable
waterproofing membranes, particularly for flat roofs and balconies.
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
9/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
The target audiences of this project will be the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA)
and the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). Between them, these two industry
bodies represent the main areas of our target market, specifically new build (RIBA) and
refurbishment (RICS). Moreover, the scope has potential to reach even further, as a result of
green building legislation due to be enforced in coming years. Finally, the competitors
mentioned in this research project are large companies, and all of them market their
waterproof membrane systems globally. Krete Sustain Systems Ltd is currently only selling
RoofKrete within the UK, although it aims to enter the global market in the future. Therefore,
the main focus will be on the UK for the purpose of this project, although the global potential
will be kept in mind throughout and discussed at times when it is directly relevant.
Because the conclusions of this project will contribute to the companys future marketing
strategy, it will be helpful to briefly consider the macro-environment within which Krete
Sustain Systems Ltd is operating. This is an important first step in planning any marketing
strategy, because macro-level factors may be critical determinants of the companys future
opportunities and threats (Grant, 2005, p.68). An organisations macro-environment consists
of political, economic, socio-cultural and technological elements (Grant, 2005, p.68).
Marketers and strategists refer to an analysis of these factors as a PEST analysis. The
managing director of Krete Sustain Systems Ltd suggested that these analyses should be
carried out in an attempt to achieve a clearer picture of the companys current strategic
position.
PEST Analysis The External Environment of Krete Sustain
Systems Ltd
Political Factors
Krete Sustain Systems Ltd currently trades in the UK market only. Within this area there are
some key political factors that will be likely to affect the external environment of the
company. The passing of the Climate Change Act 2008, with the resulting Low Carbon
Transition Plan and the 2016 zero carbon housing target, mean that there is now a distinct
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
10/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
government focus on, and long-term commitment to, the promotion of sustainability in the
UK. This creates a potentially promising business environment for a company that is offering
an environmentally friendly product.
Economic Factors
After the financial crisis, the UK economy has been left in an especially bad state. The new
Conservative government have already introduced many austerity measures aimed at rescuing
the economy, such as increased VAT (value-added tax). This is likely to make the average
British consumer feel poorer, more price-sensitive and therefore less likely to pay more for
expensive sustainability measures on their homes. Krete Sustain Systems Ltd must be
competitive with the rest of the market with the price per square metre of RoofKrete. In its
marketing strategy Krete Sustain Systems should also aim to highlight the fact that due to
RoofKretes long life span, it may save the customer more money in the long run than
similarly priced competitors.
Socio-cultural Factors
The UK governments widespread promotion of sustainability is likely to have raised
awareness of this issue in the construction industry. This has been indicated to some extent by
the existence of projects such as the Downland Gridshell Museum, and the Great British
Refurb. Whether awareness of sustainability issues has been significantly raised within the
private consumer market is still uncertain.
Technological Factors
There are certain measures that can be taken to improve the product RoofKrete in terms of
making it more environmentally friendly. RoofKrete is made from a large proportion of
cement. The cement industry is strongly focused on improving the quality of its products and
carries out ongoing research and development aimed at making cement more environmentally
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
11/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
friendly, for example, by reducing the amount of carbon dioxide emitted during cement
production (Lafarge, Cement, 2010).
Comments on PEST analysis
A brief assessment of the environmental factors affecting Krete Sustain Systems and the
product RoofKrete has shown a number of positive signs for the company. The current
political climate in the UK is quite focused on the promotion of sustainability in building, and
the government have been actively raising awareness of this topic. The economy is in a poor
state, meaning that people will be acutely sensitive to prices and as a result may prefer to
invest in products that require little maintenance. Ongoing technological advances in the
cement industry, especially regarding sustainable production processes and components,
means that Krete Sustain Systems will have more opportunity to improve the ingredients of
RoofKrete.
Project Methodology
The methodology for this project will consist of three strands: two that will analyse secondary
data, and one that will collect and analyse primary data via a research tool. Firstly, an in-depth
review of relevant literature will be conducted. Then there will be an analysis of three pieces
of government legislation: the Climate Change Act 2008, the UK Low Carbon Transition
Plan, and the Code for Sustainable Homes. The aim is to examine how the recommendations
of the legislation relate to the themes identified in the literature review. Finally, the
methodology will include a piece of primary research, aimed at a small target group of UK
architects, who are the eventual target audience for this research project. It is hoped that theprimary research will be able to provide answers and greater insight to the questions and
themes raised during the literature review and legislation analysis. The primary research aims
to find out what architects think about the efficiency of current environmental assessment
methods i.e., the Green Guide to Specification, whether they think the Green Guide could
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
12/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
be improved in any way, and also to gain a clearer indication of the factors that constitute an
environmentally friendly building product, which is necessary to make a meaningful product
comparison.
It was decided that a combination of secondary and primary data would be a suitable method
for this research project. Secondary data refers to data that has already been collected by a
party other than the current researcher, such as journal articles, government legislation, or the
results found by previous studies. Crowther (2008) recommends that researchers should
examine secondary data before even embarking on collection of primary data. It may be the
case that the secondary data can successfully answer the research questions, in which case the
use of costly and time-consuming primary research can be avoided. There are a number of
drawbacks concerning the use of secondary data, which shall be briefly outlined here. There isa huge amount of secondary data available, especially on the Internet. The researcher needs to
ensure that they do not succumb to information overload, which wastes valuable time and
effort, and that they clearly identify the data that is relevant to their research questions
(Crowther, 2008). Additionally, there is the fact that someone else has already collected the
secondary data for a different purpose, meaning that the current researcher should be very
careful about how they interpret it. Therefore it is important to evaluate the usability of
secondary data sources before attempting to include it in a research project (Crowther, 2008).
To better ensure usability, the secondary data included in this project was selected according
to the guidelines suggested by Jankowicz (1991, in Crowther, 2008). It was straightforward to
find the government legislation that pertained to climate change, because there was a limited
amount of it in existence. The literature was chosen from various environmental journals, and
the most recent studies were selected where possible.
The advantages of secondary data are quite numerous, and tend to outweigh many of the
disadvantages. Secondary data is especially useful in business related projects, and is
commonly used in this context, where it can be used to identify the problem and set
objectives (Crowther, 2008). Used in this way, secondary data can be a good opportunity for
the researcher to explore the topic further, refine the research questions and objectives, and
may also help them to design the primary research process, if any is required.
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
13/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
A triangulation approach (Cano, 2003) was chosen because it seemed that any single method
would be insufficient to cover the breadth of knowledge required by this research.
Additionally, the use of triangulation improves the reliability of the primary research by
corroborating it with other sources of data, and helps to improve primary research by enabling
the researcher to identify key variables and use the primary research to investigate these
further. The primary research method will be discussed in further detail in Chapter 4.
General Research Questions
After extensive discussions with the managing director of Krete Sustain Systems Ltd,
carrying out a basic strategic analysis of external and internal environment factors, and
gaining further understanding of the product RoofKrete, it became possible to form the
research questions for this project. It seemed possible that RoofKrete could be the most
sustainable and environmentally friendly waterproofing membrane system currently available
on the UK market, and therefore should be the first choice for architects looking for a suitable
product for constructing a waterproof flat roof on a low-carbon, sustainable building.
Therefore the first and most important research question is as follows:
1. Is RoofKrete the most sustainable and environmentally friendly flat roofing product
in the UK market today?
Secondly, there is a need to examine the concept of embodied energy more closely, especially
the embodied energy of transport. During preliminary research and reading, it appeared that
this concept may be a very important influence on the environmentally friendly nature of a
product, and so far has not been carefully considered either by competitors who are calling
their products green, or by the Buildings Research Establishment (BRE) when it created the
Green Guide to Specification. This study will present a deeper discussion of this concept,
highlighting the fact that a product wishing to call itself green or environmentally friendly
needs to have a low overall embodied energy rating. The study will also compare the
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
14/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
embodied energy of RoofKrete with 5 major flat roofing competitors. This leads to the second
research question:
2. Why is the concept of embodied energy so important?
After conducting the above research, especially in relation to embodied energy, it is possible
that some limitations in the current BRE green material ratings system might be discovered.
The aim is to assess the impact of these, and suggest how the system could be improved in the
future, which culminates in the third and final research question:
3. What are the limitations of environmental assessment methods such as the GreenGuide to Specification? How might this method need to change in the future?
Specific Research Objectives
Present the issue in an appropriate political and timely context
Conduct an in-depth literature review to identify opinions on the current themes
related to this topic, and identify any gaps that may be filled by this research.
Examine three pieces of legislation: The Climate Change Act 2008, the Code for
Sustainable Homes, and the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan.
Conduct primary research with British architects, aiming to find out how they choose
products for green building projects.
Identify the key factors that make a building product environmentally friendly.
Examine the concept of embodied energy and how it relates to a products
environmental impact over its full life cycle.
Create comparisons showing how Kretes product, RoofKrete, measures up to its
main competitors in the UK waterproofing membrane market.
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
15/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Discuss the implications of this projects findings for Krete Sustain Systems Ltd., and
suggest how the company might use the findings of this project in a new marketing
campaign.
Further discuss the future implications of this research for green building in the
United Kingdom and globally.
Project Overview
The topic of green building lies within the wider context of sustainable development and
climate change, all of which are currently under intense discussion around the world. Many
countries are now developing certain schemes, such as carbon credit trading, by which their
governments hope to reduce the damaging effects of national economic activities on the
environment. It is important therefore to first present some background to the green building
topic, discussing the opinions of experts in the field in an attempt to provide support and
justification for this project. This will be the main focus of the literature review section in
Chapter 2.
Chapter 3 will examine three pieces of government legislation in detail: the Climate Change
Act 2008, the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan, and the Code for Sustainable Homes.
Chapter 4 will discuss the chosen research method and the alternatives that were considered.
It will also present and discuss the results of primary research in the form of a questionnaire
conducted with British architects. The aim is to build upon the knowledge gained from the
literature study and the legislation analysis, and will enable identification of the main criteria
that should be present for an environmentally friendly and sustainable building product.
Chapter 5 will present a comparison of RoofKrete against waterproofing membranes
manufactured by the main competitors in the UK. These products are sold not only in the UK
but also all over the world. The most important sustainability factors were already identified
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
16/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
in Chapter 5, and these shall be compared for each product along with the embodied energy
levels.
Chapter 6 will bring together the results of the whole study and discuss the implications for
Krete Sustain Systems Ltd and the green building industry in general. It will also offer some
recommendations for the company, which will be aimed at improving its economic
performance.
Chapter 7 will conclude the research project, discuss the answers to the original research
questions, plus any new findings, and furthermore will suggest topics for further research in
this field.
The questionnaire shall be placed in the Appendices section.
2 - Literature Review
2.1 - Introduction
Before starting to investigate any topic from a new perspective, it is important and
enlightening to evaluate existing studies and opinions related to the key themes of the project.
This literature review will first briefly introduce the concept of sustainability in a global
context, highlighting the progress of attitudes from the early days of the Brundtland Report, to
the recent government targets such as zero-carbon homes by 2016, and the role of the Code
for Sustainable Homes. Then it will analyse further studies that deal with themes on which the
rest of the research can be developed. The purpose of the literature review is firstly to build a
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
17/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
foundation for the new research that will be carried out by this project and secondly to
evaluate existing works to find out if any gaps are present that this research could further
build upon. It is hoped that evidence will be found which not only points to the existence of
significant and pressing issues, but also justifies the need for this projects existence.
Definitions
At this early stage it will be helpful to clearly define three terms that will be used frequently
throughout this research project.
Green is often used to refer to anything related to environmentalism, or to the state
of being environmentally friendly. Green building, green politics, and green
energy are commonly found examples.
Environmentally friendly is a synonym for green, and will be used throughout this
research project as a more specific substitute for the former.
Sustainable is often incorrectly substituted for the former two terms. Specifically, to
be sustainable means to have the capacity to endure (Merriam-Webster Online
Dictionary 2010).
Call to Action on Sustainability: The Brundtland Report
Back in 1987, the Brundtland Report was a call to action that urged the entire world to work
together on building a sustainable future (Brundtland, 1987). This comprehensive report on
environmental issues showed how sustainability is a relatively recent concern, which only
emerged properly during the latter half of the twentieth century. The Brundtland Report
marked the start of a global shift towards environmental awareness. In particular, it
recommended changes to international institutions and legal mechanisms, effectively calling
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
18/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
for increased international action on issues of common concern (Brundtland, 1987). Perhaps
most relevantly for this project, the report highlighted the need for increased co-operation
with industry (Brundtland, 1987). Naturally, the Brundtland Report is a product of its time,
and has been subjected to a number of criticisms, namely that some of its predictions failed
to come true. Nevertheless, it has been highly influential in shaping global attitudes towards
environmental issues and can therefore be considered a seminal document in the field.
John Robinson supports one key message of the Brundtland Report, that sustainability must
be an integrative concept, across fields, sectors and scales (Robinson, 2004, p.378). He
acknowledges that since the publication of the Brundtland Report in 1987, further
developments have suggested that it will not be easy to achieve this level of integration. Morespecifically, Robinson suggests that integration of sustainability must happen across all
sectors, and to stand any chance of success, must involve the private sector, which is the
chief engine of economic activity on the planet (Robinson, 2004, p.378). Robinson argues
that governments alone do not have the will or the capability to accomplish sustainability on
their own and that is why he identifies the importance of private sector co-operation. Still, a
combined effort by government and the private sector is not sufficient for a successful
sustainable future. Civil society must also be involved, meaning that people have to change
their attitudes. We need a political constituency for change, a market for different products
and consumption patterns, and social acceptance of both the public policy and the private
sector actions needed to accomplish these goals, no fundamental changes in behaviour or
practice are possible (Robinson, 2004, p.378). Many governments and NGOs are now
zealously pursuing the goals described by Robinson. The UK has been especially active in
implementing a political constituency for change by setting environmental targets.
Additionally, the UK government has tried to present clearly defined pathways to guide the
country towards the targets. Robinsons mention of a market for different products and
consumption patterns (Robinson, 2004, p.378) directly refers to the need for a wider
acceptance of environmentally friendly products, so that they soon become the norm. This is
especially relevant within this projects area of study - the building industry.
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
19/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
The Importance of Materials
A large part of the literature focuses on the importance of using sustainable building
materials, and one study in particular examines in detail the role of such materials in
maintaining sustainable societies. Berge (2009) draws attention to L.P. Hedebergs Four
Conditions to Achieve a Sustainable Society. Three of these conditions are directly relevant
to the research questions of this project,
1. Do not take more out of the crust of the Earth than can be replaced. This means that
we should try to avoid the use of fossil fuels and mining, because materials extracted
from beneath the Earths surface can only be renewed very slowly and in small
quantities.2. Do not use man-made materials that take a long time to decompose. Many man-made
materials, that have never been a part of the natural lifecycle, are very difficult for
Nature to break down. For example, plastics can take many years to decompose.
3. Use resources efficiently and correctly, stop being wasteful. When using materials to
build with, accurate quantities should be used in order to avoid needless waste. This is
also an important consideration during the material manufacturing process (Berge,
2009, p.xiv).
Berge questions the feasibility of a building technology that meets all of the above
requirements emerging during our lifetimes (Berge, 2009). In addition to the three aspects
mentioned above, there are many others that should be considered when sustainable buildings
are created, for example, cost and longevity. Building materials play a huge role in
sustainable construction, and have the potential to help societies reach a high level of
sustainability. Berge highlights a number of other aspects worthy of consideration when
thinking more deeply about green building. He summarises these as follows:
Work - Methods used to produce each building component. How production currently
takes place and other ways which it can take place.
Raw Materials - Occurrence of material resources, their nature, distribution and
potential for recycling.
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
20/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Energy - The energy consumed when producing and transporting the materials, and
their durability.
Pollution - Pollution during production, use and demolition, the chemical footprint of
each different material (Berge, 2009, p.xv).
It has now been established that identifying and using the correct building materials is an
important element of sustainable building. Dorothy Chwieduk (2003) further expands on this
by highlighting the importance of promotion of quality when designing a sustainable
building strategy, in particular focusing on quality of materials (Chwieduk, 2003, p.216).
Chwieduk discusses the value of using the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) method to consider
the energy and environmental effects of buildings, systems, elements and materials startingfrom the extraction through to production and use to the end-use (i.e. the disposal and/or
recycling) (Chwieduk, 2003, p.216). Chwieduk specifically highlights the importance of
embodied energy as a critical part of the LCA consideration. She goes on to point out that
selection of materials should be performed with the least impact on the environment, taking
the complete life cycle into account (Chwieduk, 2003, p.217). The themes introduced by
Chwieduk: embodied energy, quality of materials, and full life cycle analysis, are further
expanded upon in later studies that will be discussed during this review.
Embodied Energy and Full Life Cycle Analysis
Embodied energy, as mentioned by in the previous study, is a very important part of the
sustainable building analysis. Yohanis and Norton (2001) develop this idea further in their
study of the life cycle operational and embodied energy for a generic office building in the
UK. Firstly, they provide a useful definition of embodied energy as, the energy embodied in a
building is that used to extract, manufacture and transport building materials and components
(Yohanis & Norton, 2001, p.77). Secondly, they categorise energy use into operational energy
(for running of the building) and embodied energy of building materials (Yohanis & Norton,
2001, p.78). The fact that buildings are becoming increasingly more efficient at using energy
means that embodied energy is becoming a larger part of the total energy used over a
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
21/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
buildings life cycle. Yohanis & Norton point out the problems involved in accurately
measuring embodied energy, due to a lack of reliable and accurate data (Yohanis & Norton,
2001, p.77). However, this study is now nine years old, and since it was written the industry
has devised more accurate methods of measuring embodied energy, such as can be referenced
in Bjorn Berges book The Ecology of Building Materials (2009).
The issue of life cycle analysis is again mentioned by Yohanis & Norton, who link it to the
concept of embodied energy by arguing that recurring embodied energy should form a
significant part of whole life cycle analysis (Yohanis & Norton, 2001). They also give
illustrative estimates for the additional energy associated with replacement and repair over the
lives of various buildings, which reinforces the point that this is an aspect that cannot beignored. In conclusion, Yohanis & Norton suggest that the additional consideration of
recurring embodied energy over the lifetime of a building further strengthens the case for
proper design and selection of materials to reduce overall energy consumption in the
construction industry (Yohanis & Norton, 2001, p.88). From the conclusions presented in
this study, and also in the work of Chwieduk, it can be clearly seen that embodied energy of
building materials is a topic meriting further investigation, and as such should form a major
part of this research project. It seems that any method of assessing the greenness of
buildings ought to take embodied energy of materials into account. The works of Chwieduk
and Yohanis & Norton, while providing some enlightening perspectives on embodied energy,
were both published long before the Code for Sustainable Homes (the Code) was introduced
in the UK. The Code is the UKs universal system for rating the sustainability of domestic
buildings. Examining a more recent study will be helpful to determine how embodied energy
of materials might relate to the Code.
Potential Flaws in the Code for Sustainable Homes
McManus, Gaterell and Coates (2009) produced a recent article arguing that the Code has
some inherent flaws. McManus et alsuggest that the Code may be unable to meet its targets
for sustainable energy due to inconsistencies between the ways in which low and zero-carbon
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
22/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
technologies are assessed, and how they behave in real-life situations (McManus, Gaterell &
Coates, 2009). The paper concludes that further research and policy changes are needed to
ensure that sustainable energy is delivered in the housing sector (McManus, Gaterell &
Coates, 2009). In particular, the study mentions that reaching the highest level of the Code,
zero-carbon, may be especially difficult due to a number of factors. The most relevant of
these is failure to consider the full lifecycle of the technologies that are likely to be used
(McManus, Gaterell & Coates, 2009, p.2017). The main emphasis of this study is that
embodied energy will have a strong impact, which must be included in any attempt to develop
a sustainable energy strategy. McManus et alsuggest that it is vital to examine the full life
cycles, including all maintenance requirements, for all technologies that will be included in
zero-carbon homes (McManus, Gaterell & Coates, 2009, p.2017). This means that aconstruction product with low embodied energy levels would contribute to improving the
overall energy efficiency of new buildings. A product of this sort may offer a significant
advantage over other flat roofing materials if it can be proven to have the lowest embodied
energy level over its full life cycle (McManus, Gaterell & Coates, 2009, p.2017).
Cost of Ownership and Full Life Cycle
A further theme in the literature is cost, which will be especially relevant to architects when
choosing which materials to specify. Cost in this context refers to the overall cost of
ownership (Malin, 2000, p.410). In Malins article the author addresses the commonly held
perception that environmentally preferable materials cost more and concludes that this does
not need to be the case (Malin, 2000, p.408). He introduces the idea of life cycle costs, an idea
that is especially relevant to this project and that relates to the literature already discussed.
Malin offers a useful definition of the term environmentally preferable, which is
synonymous with green and, broadly defined, can be any material that contributes to an
optimally green building (Malin, 2000, p.409). More specifically, the author suggests that
environmentally preferable can also refer to materials that have the best environmental
performance over time (Malin, 2000). Malin also lists a number of criteria that are commonly
looked for when identifying a building material as being green. These are as follows:
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
23/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
recycled content, low embodied energy (reducing the pollution associated with energy used
to make the product), and the use of minimally processed, natural raw materials (avoiding
the toxic intermediaries and by-products of the petrochemical industry) (Malin, 2000, p.409).
Malin argues strongly that although some green materials may at first be more costly than
ordinary materials, they may enable the owner to recoup the initial costs over the life cycle of
the building. This happens especially in the case of materials whose environmental benefits
come from providing enhanced building performance (Malin, 2000). In summary, Malin
makes two key points, firstly, that there is a strong relationship between cost and full life
cycle. Secondly, materials that perform well and require less maintenance over the life cycle
of a building will be more cost-effective in the long term (Malin, 2000).
The literature that has been discussed so far strongly suggests that the research questions of
this project are highly relevant and valid. It seems possible that the current green roofing
products in the industry may not be as green as previously thought. This presents an
opportunity for a new product to come into prominence. This product should meet all of the
green criteria specified above by Malin, also have a long life cycle (possibly outlasting the
building itself), and be comparable in cost to the leading roofing materials on the market
(Malin, 2000). However, in the UK at least, the green building industry is regulated by
legislation exists that attempts to regulate the types of materials that are used when creating
environmentally friendly buildings. The Code for Sustainable Homes is a major area of
environmental policy that is supported by the Green Guide to Specification, an environmental
assessment method and comprehensive directory of green building products and systems.
Limitations of Existing Environmental Assessment Tools
As already suggested by McManus et alin their 2009 study, the Code for Sustainable Homes
may be flawed because it does not properly consider the full life cycles of the products
involved in achieving zero-carbon housing. Grace Ding (2007) offers a further discussion of
environmental assessment tools, examines their limitations and suggests a new approach. At
the beginning, Ding admits that creating a single environmental assessment method is no
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
24/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
easy task (Ding, 2007, p.451). She goes on to present an in-depth analysis of environmental
assessment methods worldwide, a breadth that is beyond the scope of this project. However, it
will be interesting to briefly examine some of the limitations that she discovers, to see
whether they can be relevant to this analysis of the Code for Sustainable Homes. Ding
identifies that the primary role of a building assessment method is to provide a
comprehensive assessment of the environmental characteristics of a building using a common
and verifiable set of criteria and targets for building owners and designers to achieve higher
environmental standards (Ding, 2007, p.452). Ding goes on to suggest that, in general,
existing environmental assessment methods are limited in a number of ways that reduce their
effectiveness and usefulness (Ding, 2007). Ding suggests that the overall reason for these
limitations is that we still do not clearly understand the interactions between buildingconstruction and the environment (Ding, 2007, p.452). Additionally, Ding argues that current
assessment systems are too complex, that they involves large amounts of qualitative data that
cannot be easily measured, and that financial aspects of building projects are not
acknowledged in the evaluation framework. As a solution, Ding recommends that a multiple-
dimensional model of project appraisal should be used (Ding, 2007, p.452). She refers to a
previous study (Ding & Langston, 2002) that creates a sustainability index consisting of four
main criteria (Maximise wealth, maximise utility, minimise resources and minimise impact).
Minimise resources is particularly relevant to this project and refers to all inputs over the
full life cycle expressed in terms of energy (embodied and operational) (Ding, 2007, p.460).
Ding and Langston suggest that an environmental assessment method that used the four
criteria in tandem with a weighting system would be helpful to greatly simplify the
measurement of sustainable development (Ding, 2007, p.464) and make it easier to select
optimum design solutions (Ding, 2007, p.464). The work of Ding presents some useful
opinions supporting the research questions of this project and the views of the previous
authors. There is now a clear consensus throughout the literature that the concept of embodied
energy is extremely important. However, it seems that Dings work is a little simplistic, and
possibly does not examine the many worldwide environmental assessment systems in
adequate detail. Also, the paper was published in 2007, which was too early to include any
references to the Code for Sustainable Homes.
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
25/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Zero Carbon Homes in 2016
The Code for Sustainable Homes is closely linked to the UK zero-carbon domestic homes
target in 2016. Many UK builders agree that this is a challenging target with a range of
diverse barriers that will make it more difficult to reach. However, the overall opinion is that
the challenge is not impossible if certain conditions are met. Osmani and OReilly (2009)
examined this topic further by conducting a series of questionnaires with major players in the
UK building industry. Firstly, most of the respondents agree that the 2016 target is
exceptionally demanding. Secondly they point out that there are numerous legislative,
cultural, financial and technical barriers facing house builders to deliver zero-carbon homes in
England by 2016 (Osmani & OReilly, 2009, p.1917). However, the same group of housebuilders did concur that the challenges are not completely insurmountable. They believed that
if a swift, all-embracing and above all realistic strategy is adopted and implemented across
the supply chain (Osmani & OReilly, 2009, p.1917) English house builders could
successfully deliver the required zero-carbon homes by 2016.
The respondents pointed out an issue with the perceived reliability of green construction
technologies. Renewable and environmentally friendly methods are often seen as detrimental
to profit, outside space and aesthetics (Osmani & OReilly, 2009, p.1919). However, it is
unclear whether this includes building materials or refers to more visible technologies such as
solar panels, which may indeed be problematic in the above-mentioned ways. Respondents
also identified issues with cost, citing what they viewed as the higher perceived costs of
sustainable building materials. At least as far as building materials are concerned, and
supporting the issues already discussed in the work of Malin, this can be mitigated by paying
attention to the full life cycle of products and not just the initial cost. A product that requires
less maintenance over the lifecycle of the building will work out more cost-effective,
especially if it also increased the performance of the building (Malin, 2000).
75% of respondents identified legislation as a barrier to achieving zero-carbon, stating that it
was unclear (Osmani & OReilly, 2009, p.1920). Some respondents stated that if clarity was
still lacking by the time the Code for Sustainable Homes became compulsory, they would
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
26/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
prefer not to build zero-carbon homes but instead to absorb the extra cost of non-compliance
fines.
Concluding Comments
The literature examined in this review covered themes ranging from the broad to the specific.
Firstly, clear definitions of sustainability and environmentally preferable were presented,
which was helpful to provide further clarity. Several themes received a high degree of
consensus throughout the entire body of literature, which strongly suggests that they are
worthy of further investigation. These were as follows: the importance of considering the
quality and full life cycle of building materials, the key role of embodied energy, and the
possibility that current assessment tools may have certain limitations. This implies that there
is a need to examine the quality and life cycle of building materials, specifically those
designed for flat roofing applications. Also it will be important to consider the topic of
embodied energy more thoroughly, and in light of the eventual findings, make some
suggestions regarding the effectiveness of the current method of assessing green buildings
(The Code for Sustainable Homes and BREs Green Guide to Specification).
3 Legislation Discussion
Introduction
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
27/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
The methodology for this project will consist of three parts. Firstly, an examination of UK
government policy, specifically The Climate Change Act 2008, The Low Carbon Transition
Plan, and the Code for Sustainable Homes. The goal is firstly to identify which parts of the
legislation can be relevant to RoofKrete, and secondly to identify the criteria for an
environmentally friendly building product. Finally some predictions will be made regarding
the effect of future developments in legislation on the business opportunities of Krete Sustain
Systems Ltd. The second part of the methodology consists of a series of questionnaires sent to
UK architects. This research tool will collect and assess their views on the CSH, the future of
green flat roofing, and the importance of embodied energy. Finally, RoofKrete will be
compared to its main competitors in the UK flat roofing market.
The Climate Change Act 2008
An Act to set a target for the year 2050 for the reduction of targeted greenhouse gas
emissions; to provide for a system of carbon budgeting; to establish a Committee on Climate
Change; to confer powers to establish trading schemes for the purpose of limiting greenhouse
gas emissions or encouraging activities that reduce such emissions or remove greenhouse gas
from the atmosphere; to make provision about adaptation to climate change; to confer powers
to make schemes for providing financial incentives to produce less domestic waste and to
recycle more of what is produced; to make provision about the collection of household waste;
to confer powers to make provision about charging for single use carrier bags; to amend the
provisions of the Energy Act 2004 about renewable transport fuel obligations; to make
provision about carbon emissions reduction targets; to make other provision about climate
change; and for connected purposes.
The target for 2050:
(1) It is the duty of the Secretary of State to ensure that the net UK carbon account for the
year 2050 is at least 80% lower than the 1990 baseline.
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
28/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
(2) The 1990 baseline means the aggregate amount of
(a) Net UK emissions of carbon dioxide for that year, and
(b) Net UK emissions of each of the other targeted greenhouse gases for the year that is the
base year for that gas. (The Climate Change Act, 2008)
The text of the Climate Change Act 2008 shows that limiting greenhouse gas emissions will
be important, as will recycling and the disposal of waste, and carbon reduction targets. The
response to the Climate Change Act 2008 identifies how various industry sectors in the UK,
and the general public, can work together to achieve this goal.
The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan
This document is a response to the directions set out in the Climate Change Act 2008. It
presents a detailed report of the UK governments plan for meeting national carbon reduction
targets. Due to the passing of the Climate Change Act 2008, the UK is now the only country
in the world to have legally binding carbon reduction targets. Specifically, the goal is to cut
national carbon emissions by 34% by 2020, and at least 80% by 2050. This ambitious plan
will require people to make major changes in how they live and work. The government plans
to make extensive investments in green technology, such as renewable and efficient energy
sources; nuclear, solar and wind power. The proposed changes will affect every area of
society, so introduction must be carefully monitored and guided, and encouraged by use of
incentives. To make the governments plan successful, people must become more educated in
sustainability. For example, builders will learn to build in a way which saves energy (The
UK Low Carbon Transition Plan, 2009). Using a sustainable waterproofing membrane on flat
roofs and balconies will be one way to help achieve this.
Greenhouse gas emissions from the UKs homes constitute 13% of the countrys overall total.
Improvements on 2008 levels have already been made, but by 2050 all homes are expected to
have reached an emission level of practically zero (The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan,
2009).
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
29/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Requiring new-build homes to be built to high environmental standards, reaching zero
carbon homes from 2016 (The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan, Chapter 4, p.81).
Progress towards the zero carbon standard will be made through progressive tightening of
the Building Regulations. The Government recently set out proposals for the first step of 25%
improvement in 2010 (The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan, Chapter 4, p.94).
Building zero carbon homes will require substantial change on the part of house builders and
their suppliers (The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan, Chapter 4, p.95).
The government has started the change process well in advance in order to give the building
industry enough time to adapt to the new frameworks and methods they need to start building
in a way that is more environmentally friendly. The government has also defined a series ofsteps that will clearly guide along the path to achieving the regulatory challenges. The Low
Carbon Transition Plan acknowledges that, The alternative to meeting our carbon budgets is
not a low cost, high carbon future, but a high cost high carbon future (The UK Low Carbon
Transition Plan, Chapter 4, p.99).
It is clear that cost is an important concern for everyone involved in this transition. The
government needs to offer a range of incentives to reward people for adapting to the changes,
especially for those on lower incomes. The Transition Plan strongly states the governments
commitment to help everyone achieve the goals, and explains that they will design carbon
reduction policies to minimise costs, and offer subsidies where they are most needed. To be
widely adopted and hence successful, this ambitious plan needs to be affordable for British
people on all levels of the socio-economic scale.
The Code for Sustainable Homes
Introduction
The Code for Sustainable Homes (the Code) was introduced in April 2007 in England, and is
a voluntary standard aimed at improving the overall sustainability of British homes. It aims to
set a single clear framework where builders can construct homes to a higher environmental
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
30/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
standard (Communities & Local Government). Mandatory Code ratings were introduced in
May 2008, and now every new home must include a Code rating, although it is still possible
to have a statement of non-assessment. (Communities & Local Government) In order to
obtain a Code rating, houses are assessed by trained and licensed examiners who then award
the building a rating of one to six, based on its overall performance against a set of nine
environmental categories. The Code is closely linked to national building regulations, which
are the minimum standards required by law. The Code has been set to exceed these standards,
and hence provides an indication of the future direction of the house-building industry in
regards to environmental issues.
This section presents a more in-depth examination of Code categories, to decide which are
more relevant to RoofKrete, and how they might affect the future choices that architectsmake.
Categories of the Code for Sustainable Homes
Category 3 Materials part A
Aim: to encourage the use of materials with lower environmental impacts over their lifecycle
(CSH Technical Guide, 2007, p.89).
The production, use and disposal of building materials constitute significant use of energy and
resources both in the UK and abroad (Communities & Local Government, 2010). For flat
roofing, the most highly relevant section of the Code is Category 3 (Materials), which is
worth a significant amount of credits (15) and contains mandatory elements. In the listed
criteria for category 3 part A, roof is one of the stated at least three of the five key elements
that should achieve a relevant Green Guide rating of A+ to D (CSH Technical Guide, 2007,
p.89). The Green Guide to Specification is a key part of the Code, and is the nationally
recommended source of information for specifiers. The aim of the Green Guide is to aid
specifiers in considering the environmental implications of their choices (CSH Technical
Guide, 2007, p.89). The Green Guide uses a life cycle assessment method to measure the
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
31/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
environmental impacts of building materials from cradle to grave. It rates materials and
components on a scale from A+ to E, with products scoring A+ having the lowest impact on
the environment. A+ scoring roofing products will be the most frequently chosen by architects
wishing to specify roofing for a sustainable building.
Category 3 Materials part B
Aim: To recognise and encourage the specification of responsibly sourced materials for the
basic building elements (Communities & Local Government, 2010).
Responsible sourcing of materials is based on the fundamental principle of life cyclestewardship, which is at the heart of the Brundtland definition of sustainability as
development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their own needs (Communities & Local Government, 2010).
This statement in the Code means that, in future, specifiers need to consider the
environmental impacts of using materials not just on the roof itself, but all the way from
mining/harvesting to production through to disposal as waste. (Communities & Local
Government, 2010). This is very significant for RoofKrete and its competitors, because the
products that are proven the most sustainable are more likely to become the future market
leaders in a sustainable build, low-carbon UK.
The Green Guide to Specification
For the purposes of the Code for Sustainable Homes, the Green Guide from BRE is the
definitive rating system for all possible materials that might be used on a new build.
Currently, the highest scorers include materials such as bitumen, PVC and mastic asphalt.
High scorers will naturally be first choice for architects who wish to specify materials for a
low-carbon building. The fact that bitumen, PVC and mastic asphalt all score A+ in the Green
Guide suggests that BRE have so far failed to properly acknowledge the concept of embodied
energy in building materials. As Bjorn Berge pointed out only a year ago, this is quite a new
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
32/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
perspective and it is not yet being recognised by the majority of todays decision makers
(Berge, 2009, p.19). When decision makers finally do acknowledge the importance of full
lifecycle embodied energy of materials, the Green Guide to Specification is likely to undergo
some changes. These will be discussed in greater detail in a later chapter.
Concluding Comments
From this examination of category 3 of the Code for Sustainable Homes, it is clear that two
main aspects of building materials are the most important: low life cycle impact, and
responsible sourcing of materials. The former refers to the embodied energy of a material
over its complete life cycle (from cradle to grave), and the latter refers to the use of materials
that are sustainable, and sourcing them using the least environmentally damaging means
possible.
4 Primary Research
Introduction
Choice of research methodology
It was decided that primary research was required as opposed to purely studying the research
of others, as this project is aiming to produce new perspectives on a current issue on which
previous empirical studies seem rather limited. For the primary research, two different
methods were considered before settling on the final choice. The advantages and drawbacks
of in-person interviews and questionnaires were weighed up to assess their suitability for the
project. In-person interviews have the advantage of being highly flexible and having greater
clarity, because the researcher can ensure that the respondents fully understand each question
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
33/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
by explaining it to them. In-person interviewing also helps build rapport, which is likely to
encourage better responses. However, the respondents were widely dispersed around the
country, and constraints of time and budget meant that interviews were finally discarded in
favour of questionnaires conducted by email. It was anticipated that architects would be more
likely to reply and cooperate with a less time-consuming research method. It was decided that
a questionnaire sent and returned by email would be the most convenient way of collecting
the required data. Questionnaires usually fall into the category of quantitative research
methods, although the inclusion of qualitative open-ended questions is commonly done and
allows respondents a chance to express their opinions more freely. The main drawbacks with
qualitative research are greater ambiguity and difficulty in analysing the results, and the risk
that the researcher will impose too much of their own bias on the results during analysis. Itwas decided to construct a questionnaire containing a mixture of open and closed-ended
questions.
The questionnaire was designed so that it could be completed in less than 10 minutes. This
was deemed necessary to further encourage the respondents to give answers. It was important
that each question should be worded in a clear and straightforward manner, in order to
minimise the risk of ambiguity. The questions were prepared in collaboration with the
managing director of Krete Sustain Systems Ltd, who had enough industry and product
knowledge to help make sure that each question was clear enough to make sense to architects.
The questionnaire consisted of 10 questions: 7 closed-ended and 3 open-ended. The closed-
ended questions were included in order to gather an overall background picture of the
respondents approach to green building, to find out which products they had specified in the
past, which information sources they most frequently used, and which factors they considered
most important for an environmentally friendly building material. For ease of analysis, the
questions asked respondents to select from a list of answers, but also gave them the option to
select other and specify their own response. This ensured that the research tool did not
overly constrain respondents into a framework imposed by the researcher. The final questions
in the survey were open-ended and allowed the respondents to give their opinion freely. It was
considered that the small number of three open-ended questions would not be overly complex
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
34/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
or time-consuming to analyse, but would add a useful angle to the research by giving
respondents the chance to express their own opinions.
Reliability and validity are important issues to consider when conducting empirical research.
Reliability refers to the degree of consistency with which instances are assigned to the same
category by different observers, or by the same observer on different occasions (Cano, 2010).
Validity is the extent to which the research tool is appropriate for generating the data required.
The target group of respondents were taken from a database of architects provided by Krete
Sustain Systems Ltd. These architects had previously been in contact with the company and
therefore it could be guaranteed that they already had a certain level of knowledge aboutsustainable building, which would enable them to give more meaningful responses. In the aim
of receiving a reasonably sized sample, fifty surveys were sent out by email.
Presentation of Survey Results
15 respondents returned the survey.
Figure 1: Question 1 - Approximately what percentage of your previous projects has required you to
specify sustainable building materials?
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
35/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Figure 2 Questions 2-5
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
36/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Figure 3: Question 6 - Which of the following information sources do you use when selecting building
materials? (Please select all that apply)
Figure 4 - Question 7
Apart from embodied energy, which of the following factors do you consider to be important for
sustainable building materials? (Please select all that apply)
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
37/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construction Industry Samantha
Manniex
Figure 5: Question 9 Have you ever specified a green roof? If so, what type of material did you specify
to be placed underneath it?
Discussion of Results
Over half of the respondents had specified sustainable building materials for 50-100% of their
previous projects. This indicates that this response group should be fairly knowledgeable
about the topic and should be able to offer some insightful opinions.
75% of the respondents have previously heard of RoofKrete, although only one respondent
had specified it. This could be as a result of recent increased marketing efforts by Krete
Sustain Systems Ltd, or of informal discussions on green building online forums. All but one
of the respondents had heard of embodied energy, and 8 people had specifically considered it
when choosing materials for previous projects.
The Green Guide to Specification from BREAAM was the most commonly used reference
source, selected by 10 respondents. 2 respondents each identified the Green Book Live and
the Green Building Bible. This result is not surprising, because the Green Guide is the
standard national assessment method and information source, which is also closely linked to
36Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
70Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel2010
-
7/31/2019 A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems in the UK/International Construction Industry
38/76
A Critical Comparison of Sustainable Waterproofing Systems
in the UK Construction Industry SamanthaManniex
A Critical Comparison of Green Flat Roofing Systemsin the UK Construct