A Critical Analysis - Smrthi health carencore2018.smrthihealth.in/docs/2018/14.pdfAltered Sequences...
Transcript of A Critical Analysis - Smrthi health carencore2018.smrthihealth.in/docs/2018/14.pdfAltered Sequences...
Management Approaches for Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy
A Critical Analysis
Dr Amitesh Narayan MPT PhD
Professor in Physiotherapy
Neuro-Sensory Developmental Unit
Department of Physiotherapy
Kasturba Medical College Mangalore
Can We Identify
the Diagnostic
Differences in
These Two
Children
POLIO CEREBRAL PALSY
POLIOMYELITIS Success of Salk amp Sabin vaccine
POLIO - disappeared as major cause disability
and so
Entire resources (manpower and finances) directed for other clients with neurophysiologic disorders ie
Cerebral Palsy etc
This led to-
Physicians and therapists started treating Cerebral Palsy from an ORTHOPEDISTS
PERSPECTIVE with surgery bracing and muscle re-education
So the Question arises are
bull Can the treatment concept will be same when etiologies has the differences
Poliomyelitis where
Anterior Horn Cells
are the site of the
lesions
Cerebral Palsy-
Where pathologies
lies in the Central
Nervous System
Abnormal Posturing in 2 Different Neonates of same age
High Risk Neonate20 Days Old
Abnormal Posturing
Normal Child24 days Old
Postural symmetryAre they Spastic
What You Think of These Neonates
Do they Develop the Muscle Tightness as a result of
SPASTICITY
in their neonatal Age ONLY
To Understand the effect of Spasticity on Skeletal
Muscles of UL LL and Trunk
We must understand about the
Transmission of Musculoskeletal Forces in active Typically developing
or a child with CEREBRAL PALSYTypically Developing Child
Child with Cerebral Palsy
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Can We Identify
the Diagnostic
Differences in
These Two
Children
POLIO CEREBRAL PALSY
POLIOMYELITIS Success of Salk amp Sabin vaccine
POLIO - disappeared as major cause disability
and so
Entire resources (manpower and finances) directed for other clients with neurophysiologic disorders ie
Cerebral Palsy etc
This led to-
Physicians and therapists started treating Cerebral Palsy from an ORTHOPEDISTS
PERSPECTIVE with surgery bracing and muscle re-education
So the Question arises are
bull Can the treatment concept will be same when etiologies has the differences
Poliomyelitis where
Anterior Horn Cells
are the site of the
lesions
Cerebral Palsy-
Where pathologies
lies in the Central
Nervous System
Abnormal Posturing in 2 Different Neonates of same age
High Risk Neonate20 Days Old
Abnormal Posturing
Normal Child24 days Old
Postural symmetryAre they Spastic
What You Think of These Neonates
Do they Develop the Muscle Tightness as a result of
SPASTICITY
in their neonatal Age ONLY
To Understand the effect of Spasticity on Skeletal
Muscles of UL LL and Trunk
We must understand about the
Transmission of Musculoskeletal Forces in active Typically developing
or a child with CEREBRAL PALSYTypically Developing Child
Child with Cerebral Palsy
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
POLIOMYELITIS Success of Salk amp Sabin vaccine
POLIO - disappeared as major cause disability
and so
Entire resources (manpower and finances) directed for other clients with neurophysiologic disorders ie
Cerebral Palsy etc
This led to-
Physicians and therapists started treating Cerebral Palsy from an ORTHOPEDISTS
PERSPECTIVE with surgery bracing and muscle re-education
So the Question arises are
bull Can the treatment concept will be same when etiologies has the differences
Poliomyelitis where
Anterior Horn Cells
are the site of the
lesions
Cerebral Palsy-
Where pathologies
lies in the Central
Nervous System
Abnormal Posturing in 2 Different Neonates of same age
High Risk Neonate20 Days Old
Abnormal Posturing
Normal Child24 days Old
Postural symmetryAre they Spastic
What You Think of These Neonates
Do they Develop the Muscle Tightness as a result of
SPASTICITY
in their neonatal Age ONLY
To Understand the effect of Spasticity on Skeletal
Muscles of UL LL and Trunk
We must understand about the
Transmission of Musculoskeletal Forces in active Typically developing
or a child with CEREBRAL PALSYTypically Developing Child
Child with Cerebral Palsy
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
So the Question arises are
bull Can the treatment concept will be same when etiologies has the differences
Poliomyelitis where
Anterior Horn Cells
are the site of the
lesions
Cerebral Palsy-
Where pathologies
lies in the Central
Nervous System
Abnormal Posturing in 2 Different Neonates of same age
High Risk Neonate20 Days Old
Abnormal Posturing
Normal Child24 days Old
Postural symmetryAre they Spastic
What You Think of These Neonates
Do they Develop the Muscle Tightness as a result of
SPASTICITY
in their neonatal Age ONLY
To Understand the effect of Spasticity on Skeletal
Muscles of UL LL and Trunk
We must understand about the
Transmission of Musculoskeletal Forces in active Typically developing
or a child with CEREBRAL PALSYTypically Developing Child
Child with Cerebral Palsy
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Abnormal Posturing in 2 Different Neonates of same age
High Risk Neonate20 Days Old
Abnormal Posturing
Normal Child24 days Old
Postural symmetryAre they Spastic
What You Think of These Neonates
Do they Develop the Muscle Tightness as a result of
SPASTICITY
in their neonatal Age ONLY
To Understand the effect of Spasticity on Skeletal
Muscles of UL LL and Trunk
We must understand about the
Transmission of Musculoskeletal Forces in active Typically developing
or a child with CEREBRAL PALSYTypically Developing Child
Child with Cerebral Palsy
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
What You Think of These Neonates
Do they Develop the Muscle Tightness as a result of
SPASTICITY
in their neonatal Age ONLY
To Understand the effect of Spasticity on Skeletal
Muscles of UL LL and Trunk
We must understand about the
Transmission of Musculoskeletal Forces in active Typically developing
or a child with CEREBRAL PALSYTypically Developing Child
Child with Cerebral Palsy
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
To Understand the effect of Spasticity on Skeletal
Muscles of UL LL and Trunk
We must understand about the
Transmission of Musculoskeletal Forces in active Typically developing
or a child with CEREBRAL PALSYTypically Developing Child
Child with Cerebral Palsy
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
We must understand about the
Transmission of Musculoskeletal Forces in active Typically developing
or a child with CEREBRAL PALSYTypically Developing Child
Child with Cerebral Palsy
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Forces generated during CONTRACTION OR PASSIVE ELONGATION are
predominantly transmitted
a to bones via tendons and aponeuroses (MYOTENDINOUS PATHWAY) and
b through surrounding CONNECTIVE TISSUES (MYOFASCIAL PATHWAY)
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
SO
What Causes the Cascade of Changes in Muscles after
Neurological Insult
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Cascade of Changes in Muscles after Neurological Insult
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Changes in Muscle Forces and Joint Integrity
James R Gage Michael H Schwartz Steven E Koop Tom F Novacheck 2009 The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edition Clinics in developmental medicine no 180-181
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
These changes leads to Muscle Fiber Stiffness in Children with
Cerebral Palsy in which the role of
TITIN (Elastic component) Protein
is very Important
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Any change in muscle fiber diameter
facilitates
Change in the number of TITIN Filaments that is ARRANGED IN PARALLEL Orientation
causes
Proportional change in ABSOLUTE PASSIVE STIFFNESS of the muscle fiber
Therefore Change in MUSCLE FIBER TYPE along with change in MUSCLE FIBER
SIZE in spastic muscles influences PASSIVE MUSCLE STIFFNESS
Magid amp Law 1985 Linke et al 1996
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Do you know about the
Cellular Changes happens in Spastic Muscles
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Cross Section of Muscle Fascicle of FCU
Pathological Signs- Presence of Central Nuclei
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Thickness of Perimysium in Controls and CP
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Skeletal Muscles Changes in Cerebral Palsy Children
Fewer muscle fibers
Shorter fiber length and
Longer tendon
This causes
Weak muscles due to reduced cross-sectional areas amp
Decreased excursion resulting in reduced ROM because of
short fiber lengths
Normal Muscle Spastic Muscle
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Pathophysiology of Movement Disorder in
Cerebral Palsy Effect on Muscles Functioning
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Release of Primitive and automatic movements
a +ve signs of CNS Dysfunction-
Abnormal Reflexive tone states and abnormal movements_ not seen inintact CNS functioning
b -ve signs of CNS Damage-
Result of direct damage to motor control areas of CNS_ causes loss ofmotor control functions
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
b -ve signs of CNS Damage- contd
Loss of co-contraction
Loss of reciprocal inhibition
Delayed termination of motor unit activity
Prolonged sustaining of firing of muscle activity (loss of ability to terminate this
activity)
Restricted ROM
Note many researchers find a more direct correlation of these ndashve signs of CNS dysfunction to the childrsquos skill level then +ve sign to the childrsquos
skill level
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
If Typically Developing children- sarcomeres are stretched maximal force production will increase whereas Opposite happens in CP- sarcomeres Muscles represented include Gracilis Semitendinosus
Soleus and FCU
Mathewson MA et al submitted and Lieber RL Frideacuten J Spasticity causes a fundamental rearrangement of muscle-joint interaction Muscle Nerve 200225(2)265ndash70 and Smith LR Lee KS Ward SR et al Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length J Physiol2011589(10)2625ndash39
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Does Musculoskeletal Operations in Children
with CP helps to Gain Motor Control and
Functional Changes successfully
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
3D ultrasound images and segmentation of muscle volume of a child with Spastic
Paresis Pre and 12 MONTHS POST- MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING
Distal CompartmentProximal Compartment
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Findings of 3D ultrasound images Post 12 MONTHS of
MEDIAL HAMSTRING (ST) LENGTHENING in Spastic CP
bull After surgery this child showed
a Reduction of muscle volume by 26
b Decreased muscle belly length by 32 and
c Increase in tendon length by 62 bull Ref Haberfehlner H Jaspers RT Rutz E Harlaar J van der Sluijs JA Witbreuk MM et al (2018) Outcome of medial hamstring lengthening in children with
spastic paresis A biomechanical and morphological observational study PLoS ONE 13(2) e0192573 httpsdoiorg101371journalpone0192573
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Impact on Muscles in CP Children following Musculoskeletal Surgeries
Reduction in Number of Sarcomeres
Muscles Wasting
Altered Sequences and Abnormal Pattern of Muscles Firing during Functional Activities
Impacting the Functional Status of a Growing Child with CP
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Hence the Innovative therapeutic strategies are the
KEY for the success in
SPASTIC MUSCLES OF CHILDREN WITH CP
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Focus for the Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Spasticity
1 Trunk ROM and ExtensionFlexion Rotation
Control
2 Eccentric Muscles Facilitation
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Importance of Trunk Control
bull Trunk represents-over half of the body mass and has major role in bodyrsquos overall
postural control
bull In-spite of this clinical assessment and research (compared to limb movements)
on trunk is largely been ignored
bull Many clinical tests that are appropriate for assessing the extremities ie ROM
Proprioceptive testing are inappropriate when applied to trunk
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Importance of Trunk Control
NEGLECT OF TRUNK
may result in misinterpretation of problems seen in UE or LE
because trunk serves as the center of control for distal movements
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control- Anatomical and Functional Significance
bull All normal Functional Activities- Depends on Trunk Control as basis of Movement
bull UE- Attached to trunk by Sternoclavicular Joint by muscles and other Soft Tissues
bull LE- Attached to trunk by Hip and Pelvic Bones
bull Posture of Trunk and Pelvic- Influences position of scapula and Clavicle which in
turn has direct muscular and biomechanical effects on all movements of UE
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control- Relation with Neck Holding
bull Similarly Inability to hold the head in midline- is a major concern in
Neurological cases
bull Inability to hold the neck in Midline- May result in retention of
STARTLE RESPONSE LONGER
bull Insufficient trunk and Neck control- affects the bodyrsquos ability to
maintain it upright against the gravity- causing child to use UE to
PROP when placed in sitting ndash making child to get stuck as they are
unable to move in or out of that position due to fear of fall
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control- Normal control in any parts ndash demands the ability to dissociate different parts of the body
bull UT- From T7 and above
bull LT- From T8 and down
eg While UT is rotating LT and Pelvis may
be laterally Flexing The point of dynamic
stability for this dissociation is T7-T8
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control- An individual must experience movement and control at higher developmental levels against gravity prior to
achieving full balance control at lower developmental level
bull When child come up against the gravity he
doesnrsquot develop balance reactions at one level
unless he is put in situations in which balance
reactions at higher levels against gravity is
required
bull At each level he needs to be working on
something higher in balance to gain full balance
control at lower level against gravity
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control- Midline control is not COMPLETE without some ability to rotate
bull When the infant is gaining midline control in the
entire trunk he would have already started
working on his control in lateral and rotational
movements
EG While sitting and using hands in midline at 7
months he is already using components gained
earlier when pivoting in prone with lateral flexion
and rolling with rotation
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability
and points of control
Normal Ranges of Trunk Motion
Flexion Extension Lateral Flexion Rotation
Cervical 40 0 750 350 - 450 450 - 500
Thoracic 1050 600 200 350
Lumbar 200 50
Entire Spine 1450 1400 750 - 850 900
Source Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of controlbull Dynamic Stability
eg When a child is sitting and reaching forward for an object with his Right
hand the movement initiates at the hand and the head and UT As he
reaches forward the COG shifts and the trunk needs to counterbalance
the movement to prevent falling The reaching on the RIGHT is controlled
therefore by lateral flexion and extension on the LEFT side
If this doesnrsquot happen the child would fall in the direction towards which
he reached (RIGHT side)
Hence free function in UE and LE depends on dynamic stability within
the trunk
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control- Good postural control of trunk includes need for normal range dynamic stability and points of control
bull Points of Control Movement Initiation
Trunk flexion happens when we move down and
forward Following the initial flexion movement the
trunk extensors fire in order to grade the movement in
flexion
Most UE based functional tasks involve initiation of the
movement in hand often with UT initiating the weight shift
For the functional tasks involving gross motor skills the
initiation of weight shift occurs in the LT and Pelvis
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Areas to be Looked for in Spine Examination
bull Lateral curvature of spine
bull Truncal asymmetry
bull Uneven shoulders
bull Prominent scapula ndash uneven height
bull Rib-hump
bull uneven hips
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Pediatric Spine Examination Technique
Examination Position
1Sitting
2Standing
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Pediatric Spine Examination Techniquein Sitting
1 On Bench or
2 On Bolster
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Assessment in Children for PTObservation and Assessment of
bull Highest functional level without assistance and with assistance
bull Overall tone distribution UT Vs LT
bull Abnormal Patterns of Movement (Lack of Dissociation)
bull Information what Therapist feel under hand
bull Alignment ROM and Asymmetries
bull Balance Reactions
bull Sensation and Perception
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Analysis of
bull Asymmetry of Function
bull Immobility
bull Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Influence of Tone on above factors
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Assessment in Children for PT
Summary of
bull How the above findings related to the quality of function
bull Treatment plan to achieve goal related to function
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Consistent abnormal pattern of Movement
bull Beginning with Initiation of Weight shifts- Trunk
bull Specific Movement in Trunk eg Lateral rotation and Where
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Lets Look at some of Therapeutic Strategies to
develop Eccentric Control in Trunk UL and LL
muscles for the inhibition of Spasticity and
development of active Control in Children with CP
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Spine Rotation on Bolster
Correcting the Flexion posture of
spine and as extension develops
slowly bring rotation in spine and
then using forward righting
develop active control in spine
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Control with
Hip Adductor and Flexor
Inhibition while using
Forward Righting on
Therapy Ball
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation
with Eccentric
activation of LL
muscles
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Spastic Triplegic CP
Extension Rotation Control
with Eccentric Activation of LL
muscles while child is actively
using UL for Righting bringing
Symmetry in UL
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Change in Functional
alignment in Spastic Triplegic
CP using Bilateral Elbow
Crutches for Independent
Standing
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Spastic Triplegic CP
Using Both Hands for
Opening the Wrapper
while seated
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Self Initiated Eccentric
Activation of Iliopsoas
Hanstrings and Plantar
Flexors with Trunk
Control and UL Righting
on Physioroll
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control on Ball with Inhibition of Extension Thrust in LL
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Trunk Control with Inhibition of Knee Flexion Thrust
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Hip Extension Facilitation
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Effect of Corrective Anti-spastic Therapeutic Strategy on Body Posture in Spastic Quadriplegic CP
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Thank You
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
Any Questionshelliphellip
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009
References1 Mohr JD Management of the Trunk in Adult Hemiplegia The Bobath Concept Topics in Neurology- Lession-1 APTA Education dept 1990 APTA
2 Kapandji I The Physiology of Joints- The trunk and the Vertebral Column New York Churchill Livingstone 1974
3 Boehme R (1988) Improving upper body control An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction Tucson AZ Therapy Skill
Builder
4 Howle JM (2004) Neuro-develompmental treatment approach Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice Laguna Beach CA
NDTA
5 Schoen S amp Anderson J (1993) Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference (pp 74- 86 pp 49- 69) In P Kramer amp J Hinojosa (Eds)
Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Baltimore MD Williams amp Wilkins
6 Clinical gait analysis by Nicky Thompson Elsevier Limited copy 2007 Elsevier Ltd
7 J G Becher Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy General Management Classification of Motor Disorders American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists 142002143-149
8 Horstmann HM Bleck EE Orthopedic Management in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2007
9 James RG Michael HS Steven EK Tom FN The Identification and Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 2nd Edn Mac Keith Press 2009