A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

20
Page 1 This report presents the analytical results for comparison of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid Bacteria (PLAB) with 3M Petrifilm Aerobic Count (AC) Plates to agars used in The Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, Chapter 19 and ISO 15214: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the enumeration of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria—Colony-count technique. All analyses were conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH). 3M Petrifilm AC Plates and Aerobic Lactic Bacteria Broth were provided by 3M (Minneapolis, MN). Q Laboratories, Inc. is an independent company and is not affiliated with, nor a subsidiary of 3M. Q Laboratories, Inc. was contracted to perform an independent study by and for 3M and the data generated by Q Laboratories, Inc. during the execution of the study does not represent an endorsement of any product(s) by Q Laboratories, Inc. A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid Bacteria with 3M Petrifilm Aerobic Count Plates with Two Reference Methods for the Enumeration of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food and Environmental Surfaces Kiel Fisher, Erin Crowley, Patrick Bird, Megan Boyle, Katherine Goetz, M. Joseph Benzinger Jr., Mark Juenger, Travis Huffman, James Agin, David Goins Q Laboratories, Inc. 1400 Harrison Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45214 A validation study of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid Bacteria (PLAB) with 3M Petrifilm Aerobic Count (AC) Plates for the enumeration and detection of lactic acid bacteria was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio. The PLAB counts were compared to the counts obtained by the agars used in two reference methods: The Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, Chapter 19 and ISO 15214: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the enumeration of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria—Colony-count technique. The Compendium reference agar, All Purpose Tween agar plus 2% sucrose and bromocresol purple (APTS) and the ISO reference agar, deMan, Rogasa, Sharpe plus bromocresol purple (MRS) were used in the in the analysis of both food and environmental swab samples. Four food matrices and one environmental surface were used in the comparative evaluation: salad dressings, ready to eat (RTE) salads, RTE meats, raw meats and stainless steel surfaces. For those matrices that were inoculated, various brands of each matrix were spiked with Lactobacillus fermentum ATCC 14931 or Weissella viridescens ATCC 12706 at two target recovery levels on 3M Petrifilm AC Plates: a low level of 1–15 CFU/ plate and a medium level of 15–75 CFU/ plate. Natural lactic acid bacteria contamination was recovered in five brands of RTE meat and in all brands of raw meat. A paired t-test, comparing the PLAB procedure and the reference methods at varying time points, was conducted at the 95% confidence level. Statistically comparable mean log values were determined for salad dressings, RTE salads, RTE meats, and stainless steel surfaces. The PLAB procedure demonstrated reliability as a rapid and selective quantitative method for the enumeration of lactic acid producing bacteria. June 24, 2011

Transcript of A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 1: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 1

This report presents the analytical results for comparison of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid Bacteria (PLAB) with

3M™ Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count (AC) Plates to agars used in The Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination

of Foods, Chapter 19 and ISO 15214: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the enumeration of

mesophilic lactic acid bacteria—Colony-count technique. All analyses were conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH).

3M Petrifilm AC Plates and Aerobic Lactic Bacteria Broth were provided by 3M (Minneapolis, MN).

Q Laboratories, Inc. is an independent company and is not affiliated with, nor a subsidiary of 3M. Q Laboratories, Inc. was contracted to perform an independent study by and for 3M and the data generated by Q Laboratories, Inc. during the execution of the study does not represent an endorsement of any product(s) by Q Laboratories, Inc.

A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid Bacteria with 3M™ Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count Plates with Two Reference Methods for the Enumeration of Lactic Acid

Bacteria in Food and Environmental Surfaces

Kiel Fisher, Erin Crowley, Patrick Bird, Megan Boyle, Katherine Goetz, M. Joseph Benzinger Jr., Mark Juenger, Travis Huffman, James Agin, David Goins

Q Laboratories, Inc. 1400 Harrison Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45214

A validation study of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid Bacteria (PLAB) with 3M™ Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count (AC) Plates for the

enumeration and detection of lactic acid bacteria was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio. The PLAB counts were

compared to the counts obtained by the agars used in two reference methods: The Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological

Examination of Foods, Chapter 19 and ISO 15214: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the

enumeration of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria—Colony-count technique. The Compendium reference agar, All Purpose Tween agar

plus 2% sucrose and bromocresol purple (APTS) and the ISO reference agar, deMan, Rogasa, Sharpe plus bromocresol purple (MRS)

were used in the in the analysis of both food and environmental swab samples. Four food matrices and one environmental surface

were used in the comparative evaluation: salad dressings, ready to eat (RTE) salads, RTE meats, raw meats and stainless steel

surfaces. For those matrices that were inoculated, various brands of each matrix were spiked with Lactobacillus fermentum ATCC

14931 or Weissella viridescens ATCC 12706 at two target recovery levels on 3M Petrifilm AC Plates: a low level of 1–15 CFU/ plate and

a medium level of 15–75 CFU/ plate. Natural lactic acid bacteria contamination was recovered in five brands of RTE meat and in all

brands of raw meat. A paired t-test, comparing the PLAB procedure and the reference methods at varying time points, was conducted

at the 95% confidence level. Statistically comparable mean log values were determined for salad dressings, RTE salads, RTE meats,

and stainless steel surfaces. The PLAB procedure demonstrated reliability as a rapid and selective quantitative method for the

enumeration of lactic acid producing bacteria.

June 24, 2011

Page 2: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 2

Materials and Methods

The methodology for this study was followed as outlined in the protocol: Comparison of a 3M™ Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count Plate

Method with Three Methods for the Enumeration of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food and Environmental Samples, provided by 3M.

The study objective was to evaluate the performance of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid Bacteria with 3M™ Petrifilm™

Aerobic Count (AC) Plates to the ISO and Compendium Reference Methods for detecting and enumerating lactic acid bacteria.

The following matrices were analyzed: salad dressings, ready to eat (RTE) salads, RTE meats, raw meats, and stainless steel

surfaces. A detailed list of the brands used in the food analysis is presented in Table A.

Culture Preparation and Inoculation of Test PortionsReplicates of each matrix varied by food or surface type and were inoculated with Lactobacillus fermentum ATCC 14931 or

Weissella viridescens ATCC 12706 at two target recovery levels on 3M Petrifilm AC Plates: a low level of 1–15 colony forming

units (CFU)/plate and a medium level of 15–75 CFU/plate. To prepare salad dressings and RTE salads for inoculation, the

suspensions of L. fermentum and W. viridescens were prepared in deMan, Rogasa, Sharpe broth (MRS) with 1.0% glucose. The

L. fermentum inoculum was incubated aerobically for 24 ± 2 hours at 35 ± 2°C and the W. viridescens inoculum was incubated

microaerophilically for 24 ± 2 hours at 35 ± 2°C. Twenty-five 1g sample portions were inoculated, mixed thoroughly, and held

for 48 ± 6 hours at 10°C to allow the organism to equilibrate within the matrix. For the analysis of RTE meats, L. fermentum

and W. viridescens inocula were prepared in MRS broth and incubated for 24 ± 2 hours at 35 ± 2°C. Twenty-five gram sample

portions were inoculated, mixed thoroughly, and held in a CO2 atmosphere to simulate packaging conditions for 48 ± 6 hours at

10°C. Following the equilibration step for all food matrices, 25 ± 1g test portions were diluted 1:10 with 0.1% peptone water.

If necessary, subsequent dilutions were made in 90mL of 0.1% peptone water to achieve the target recovery levels on PLAB.

Additionally, naturally contaminated brands of both RTE and raw meats were diluted in 0.1% peptone water until target recovery

levels were achieved.

Table A. Matrix Details

Identification Brand

Salad Dressings RTE Salads

Caesar 1 Cardini’s Caesar Dressing Mustard Potato 1 Meijer Markets Mustard Potato Salad

Caesar 2 Newman’s Own Caesar Dressing Mustard Potato 2 Grandma’s Mustard Potato Salad

LoFat Caesar 1 Cardini’s Light Caesar Dressing Mustard Potato 3 Kroger Mustard Potato Salad

LoFat Caesar 2 Ken’s Steak House Light Caesar Dressing American Potato 1 Grandma’s Potato Salad with Egg

Ranch 1 Kroger Creamy Ranch Dressing American Potato 2 Meijer Markets American Potato Salad

Ranch 2 Ken’s Steak House Ranch Dressing American Potato 3 Kroger American Potato Salad

LoFat Ranch 1 Kroger Lite Creamy Ranch Dressing Macaroni 1 Kroger Macaroni Salad

LoFat Ranch 2 Kraft Light Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing Macaroni 2 Meijer Macaroni Salad

Catalina 1 Kraft Classic Catalina Dressing Plus Dip Macaroni 3 Grandmas’ Macaroni Salad

Catalina 2 Kroger California French Dressing Bean 1 Kroger Baked Beans

Blue Cheese 1 Kraft Roka Brand Blue Cheese Dressing Bean 2 Gordon Food Services Baked Beans

Blue Cheese 2 Kroger Chunky Blue Cheese Dressing Bean 3 Meijer Baked Beans

Blue Cheese 3 Ken’s Steak House Chunky Blue Cheese Dressing Coleslaw 1 Meijer Cole Slaw

Zesty Italian 1 Kroger Zesty Italian Dressing Coleslaw 2 Kroger Cole Slaw

Zesty Italian 2 Kraft Zesty Italian Dressing Coleslaw 3 Grandma’s Cole Slaw

RTE Meats Raw Meats

O/R Turkey 1 Sara Lee Fresh Ideas Oven Roasted Turkey Breast Ground Turkey 1 Honeysuckle White Ground Turkey 93/7

O/R Turkey 2 Kroger Deli Thin Sliced Oven Roasted Turkey Breast Ground Turkey 2 Kroger Ground Turkey 85/15

Roast Beef 1 Kroger Deli Thin Sliced Roast Beef Chicken 1 Tyson All Natural Chicken Breast Tenderloins 85/15

Roast Beef 2 Private Selection Homestyle Slow Roasted Roast Beef Chicken 2 Perdue Fresh Ground Chicken

O/R Chicken 1 Private Selection Homestyle Slow Roasted Chicken Breast Ground Beef 1 Kroger Ground Sirloin 90/10

O/R Chicken 2 Sara Lee Fresh Ideas Oven Roasted Chicken Breast Ground Beef 2 Laura’s Lean Ground Beef 92/8

Smoked Ham 1 Private Selection Smokehouse Hickory Ham Steak 1 Kroger Beef Top Sirloin

Smoked Ham 2 Kroger Deli Think Sliced Smoked Ham Steak 2 Kroger Beef Bottom Round Steak Choice

Page 3: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 3

For the analysis of stainless steel environmental surfaces, sixteen 1" x 1" surface areas per organism were inoculated with a

dilution of a L. fermentum or W. viridescens broth culture. The L. fermentum inoculum was prepared using Brain Heart Infusion

Broth and incubated aerobically for 24 ± 2 hours at 35 ± 2°C. The W. viridescens inoculum was prepared in MRS and incubated

microaerophilically for 24 ± 2 hours at 35 ± 2°C. The inoculated surfaces were left to dry at ambient temperature for 18 ± 2

hours prior to sampling. For each organism, eight surface areas were sampled using environmental swabs pre-moistened with

Dey-Engley Neutralizing broth (D/E) and eight surface areas were sampled using environmental swabs pre-moistened with

Letheen Broth (LB). The surface areas were sampled in both horizontal and vertical motions. After sampling, the D/E swabs

were placed into a test tube containing 9mL of D/E and the LB swabs were placed into a test tube containing 9mL of LB.

Subsequent dilutions of these samples were prepared in 9mL test tubes of either D/E or LB to achieve the target recovery levels

on 3M™ Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count (AC) Plates.

Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid Bacteria (PLAB) with 3M Petrifilm AC Plates Method

For the PLAB procedure, a 2.0mL aliquot of sample was transferred to a test tube containing 2.0mL of Lactic Bacteria Broth.

After vortexing the solution, a 1.0mL aliquot (0.5mL of sample and 0.5mL of Lactic Broth) was plated onto the 3M Petrifilm

AC Plate. PLAB plates were assayed in quadruplicate and incubated aerobically at 35 ± 2°C for food samples and 25 ± 2°C

for environmental samples for up to 72 ± 3 hours. Halos (acid zones) with and without associated colonies on PLAB plates

were enumerated after 24 ± 2 hours, 48 ± 3 hours, and 72 ± 3 hours of incubation. The presence of colonies with associated gas

bubbles were recorded after 72 ± 3 hours of incubation. For those RTE and raw meat samples that were naturally contaminated,

isolated colonies recovered from the PLAB plates were identified by transferring to tryptic soy agar (TSA) and incubated for 24

± 2 hours at 35 ± 2°C. Final organism identifications were achieved by the VITEK Anaerobe Identification (ANI) method.

Compendial and ISO Reference Methods

For the Compendial method procedure using All Purpose Tween agar plus 2% sucrose and bromocresol purple (APTS), 1.0mL

sample aliquots were pour plated in duplicate and incubated aerobically at 25 ± 2°C for up to 72 ± 3 hours. In addition to APTS

pour plates, salad dressing and stainless steel environmental samples were spread plated onto APTS using 0.25mL sample

aliquots. For the ISO reference method procedure using MRS plus bromocresol purple, 1.0mL sample aliquots were pour plated

in duplicate and incubated anaerobically at 35 ± 2°C. Two sets of MRS pour plates were prepared, one set incubated for 48 ± 3

hours and the other set incubated for 72 ± 3 hours. For each reference agar, colonies with and without halos were enumerated

after 48 ± 3 hours and 72 ± 3 hours. After the 72 hour enumeration, a representative colony from each sample plate was

transferred to MRS broth containing a Durham tube to detect gas production and was incubated at 35 ± 2°C for 5 to 7 days.

Results and Discussion

For the statistical analysis, a paired t-test for two sample means was calculated to analyze statistical differences between the PLAB

counts and reference agar counts at varying time points. The PLAB and reference agar time points used in the statistical analyses

are listed in Table B. The t-tests were calculated using counts across all brands and organisms for each inoculation level within the

matrices. Two procedures were used to obtain the values used in the statistical comparison. For the first method (Method 1), one

PLAB replicate from each brand and organism was compared to one reference agar replicate from each brand and organism. The

PLAB counts were converted to a count per milliliter by multiplying the 0.5mL value by a factor of two. The count per milliliter

values were converted to a Log10 values and compared to single reference agar counts converted to Log10 values in the t-test. For

the second method (Method 2), all four PLAB replicates and both reference agar replicates were used in the t-test calculation. Two

3M Petrifilm AC Plate replicates were added together and the second two 3M Petrifilm AC Plate replicates were added together

to produce two count per milliliter values. The two counts calculated values were converted to Log10 values and averaged. The

Page 4: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 4

reference agar counts were converted to Log10 values and averaged. The averaged Log10 values from the PLAB method were

compared to averaged Log10 values from each of the reference agars.

Salad Dressings

For the 24 hour time point, colonies with associated halos were observed on the low level W. viridescens PLAB plates and

medium level W. viridescens PLAB plates had complete yellowing of the agar after 24 hours. The L. fermentum low and medium

level PLAB plates had no colonies or acid zones at 24 hours. Statistically comparable log values were observed comparing

48 hour 3M™ Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count (AC) Plate counts vs. 48 hour APTS pour plate counts at both levels using both

statistical procedures. A detailed list of t-test results for salad dressings is presented in Table 4 of Appendix 1.

RTE Salads

For the 24 hour time point, colonies with associated halos were observed on the low level W. viridescens PLAB plates. Medium

level L. fermentum and W. viridescens PLAB plates were completely yellow after 48 hours. At the 48 and 72 hour time point,

PLAB plates with colonies had associated halos and gas bubbles. Statistically comparable log values were observed comparing

72 hour 3M Petrifilm AC Plate counts vs. 72 hour MRS counts at the medium inoculation level using both statistical procedures.

Statistically comparable log values were observed comparing 72 hour 3M Petrifilm AC Plate counts vs. 72 hour APTS pour plate

counts at the medium inoculation level using t-test Method 2. A detailed list of t-test results for RTE salads is presented in Table

8 of Appendix 1.

RTE Meats

Colonies with associated halos were observed on PLAB plates from the naturally contaminated Private Selection Smokehouse

Hickory Ham. All low level PLAB plates had colonies with associated halos and gas production at the 48 hour time point. All

medium level PLAB plates were completely yellow at the 48 hour time point and had evidence of gas production. Statistically

comparable log values were calculated for the medium level 48 hour 3M Petrifilm AC Plate counts vs. 48 hour APTS pour plate

counts, 48 hour 3M Petrifilm AC Plate counts vs. 72 hour APTS pour plate counts, 72 hour 3M Petrifilm AC Plate counts vs.

72 hour APTS pour plate counts, and 72 hour 3M Petrifilm AC Plate counts vs. 72 hour MRS counts time points using both

t-test methods. L. acidophilus at an acceptable confidence level, L. jensenii at a very good confidence level, and L. cellobiosus

at an excellent confidence level were identified using the VITEK ANI method. A detailed list of t-test results for RTE meats is

presented in Table 11 of Appendix 1.

Raw Meats

At the 24 hour time point, PLAB plates were completely yellow with no associated colonies. At the 48 hour time point, PLAB

plates had colonies with associated gas production. APTS and MRS were overgrown with bacillus and an accurate enumeration

of lactic organisms could not be completed. L. acidophilus, L. jensenii, and L. casei were identified using the VITEK ANI

method at a low discrimination confidence level. A detailed list of PLAB counts for raw meats is presented in Table 12 of

Appendix 1. Due to overgrowth of the competing bacillus, no statistical comparisons were conducted for the raw meats.

Table B.

Method and Time Points Used in Statistical Analysis

48 Hour 3M™ Petrifilm™ AC Plate Counts vs. 48 Hour APTS Pour Plate Counts

48 Hour 3M™ Petrifilm™ AC Plate Counts vs. 72 Hour APTS Pour Plate Counts

48 Hour 3M™ Petrifilm™ AC Plate Counts vs. 72 Hour APTS Pour Plate Counts

72 Hour 3M™ Petrifilm™ AC Plate Counts vs. 72 Hour MRS Counts

72 Hour 3M™ Petrifilm™ AC Plate Counts vs. 72 Hour MRS Counts

Page 5: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 5

Stainless Steel Environmentals

Colonies with associated acid zones and gas production were observed on LAB plates at the 48 hour time period and complete

yellowing of the agars occurred at the 72 hour time point. Statistically comparable log values were calculated for the 48 hour

3M™ Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count (AC) Plate counts vs. 48 hour APTS pour plate counts comparison using both t-test methods. A

detailed list of t-test results for stainless steel environmental surface swabs is presented in Table 17 of Appendix 1.

Observations

The method comparison results obtained in the evaluation demonstrate the reliability of the PLAB procedure as an easy-to-use

method for the enumeration and detection of lactic acid organisms in a variety of foods and on stainless steel environmental

surfaces. The method requires a simple plating procedure and eliminates the lengthy gas production confirmation procedure

used in the reference methods. The PLAB method reduces the cost of sample preparation by eliminating the need for producing

and sterilizing reference method agars and eliminates costly materials needed to create and maintain an anaerobic environment

for MRS. The initial appearance of acid zones on PLAB is an accurate early indicator of the presence of lactic acid organisms

as acid zones were always observed surrounding typical red colonies. Colony associated gas production was observed on each

PLAB plate which is a distinct advantage over the reference procedures. The low inoculum level PLAB plates produced distinct

zones and colonies sooner than the medium level PLAB plates. It was often observed that the medium level did not have distinct

acid zones, instead the agar turned completely yellow and colonies were faint. When enumerating lactic organisms from matrices

with a high volume of non-target bacteria, the PLAB plates were easier to accurately enumerate compared to APTS. APTS often

had overgrowth of bacillus and other non- target bacteria, which made enumerating colonies with acid zones challenging. This

gives PLAB an advantage as only true lactic acid producing organisms and no bacillus was observed on 3M Petrifilm AC Plates.

3M and Petrifilm are trademarks of 3M.

Page 6: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 6

APPENDIX 1

Page 7: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 7

Tabl

e 1.

Sal

ad D

ress

ing

Resu

lts —

Lac

toba

cillu

s fe

rmen

tum

Dres

sing

Aero

bic

Proc

edur

e fo

r Lac

tic A

cid

Bact

eria

with

3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Aer

obic

Cou

nt P

late

s (0

.5m

L)AP

TS (0

.25m

L)AP

TS (1

.0m

L)M

RS (1

.0m

L)

24 H

our

48 H

our*

72 H

our*

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

Repl

icat

e

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

AB

AB

AB

AB

AB

Low Level

Caes

ar 1

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

31

00

10

Caes

ar 2

00

00

00

00

22

60

00

01

00

84

913

4931

LoFa

t Cae

sar 1

00

00

00

00

00

10

00

00

00

30

00

11

LoFa

t Cae

sar2

0

00

00

00

00

10

00

00

00

00

11

34

6

Ranc

h 1

00

00

00

03

20

05

00

00

00

32

2316

3635

Ranc

h 2

00

00

10

00

20

01

00

00

00

14

00

46

LoFa

t Ran

ch 1

00

00

43

33

159

96

00

00

00

21

1212

3237

LoFa

t Ran

ch 2

00

00

1721

2420

4544

4250

00

1310

00

5040

2030

123

117

Cata

lina

10

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

11

21

2

Cata

lina

20

00

00

00

00

02

00

00

00

00

14

420

21

Blue

Che

ese

10

00

00

00

01

00

10

00

00

01

10

07

3

Blue

Che

ese

20

00

00

00

00

31

10

00

00

01

32

11

3

Blue

Che

ese

30

00

00

00

01

00

00

00

00

04

40

03

4

Zest

y Ita

lian

10

00

00

00

01

01

00

00

00

00

01

04

0

Zest

y Ita

lian

20

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

01

31

312

13

Medium Level

Caes

ar 1

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

13

41

58

Caes

ar 2

00

00

31

14

1322

1711

00

44

00

2021

1826

3846

LoFa

t Cae

sar 1

00

00

01

00

11

12

00

11

00

69

46

711

LoFa

t Cae

sar 2

00

00

15

27

68

78

00

24

00

1826

1722

1930

Ranc

h 1

00

00

2119

2117

5436

5758

00

1623

00

110

100

9910

616

615

9

Ranc

h 2

00

00

11

10

42

54

00

01

00

1113

1718

2826

LoFa

t Ran

ch 1

00

00

2316

2011

6357

5939

00

2218

00

116

119

143

156

152

150

LoFa

t Ran

ch 2

00

00

6769

8380

9390

8796

00

3023

00

216

177

289

301

317

306

Cata

lina

10

00

00

00

02

22

10

00

10

010

1920

1815

15

Cata

lina

20

00

00

00

00

20

20

00

00

013

1116

1216

21

Blue

Che

ese

10

00

01

10

11

12

10

01

00

08

619

2128

27

Blue

Che

ese

20

00

01

61

34

94

90

02

20

011

1313

1926

21

Blue

Che

ese

30

00

02

32

03

66

40

00

00

025

2621

3029

26

Zest

y Ita

lian

10

00

00

11

06

82

40

00

00

020

1725

2233

33

Zest

y Ita

lian

20

00

00

10

03

20

30

00

00

09

710

817

10

* Aci

d zo

nes

Page 8: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 8

Tabl

e 2.

Sal

ad D

ress

ing

Resu

lts —

Wei

ssel

la v

iride

scen

s

Dres

sing

Aero

bic

Proc

edur

e fo

r Lac

tic A

cid

Bact

eria

with

3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Aer

obic

Cou

nt P

late

s (0

.5m

L)AP

TS (0

.25m

L)AP

TS (1

.0m

L)M

RS (1

.0m

L)

24 H

our

48 H

our*

72 H

our*

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

Repl

icat

e

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

AB

AB

AB

AB

AB

Low Level

Caes

ar 1

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Caes

ar 2

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

12

63

12

00

LoFa

t Cae

sar 1

00

00

10

00

10

00

00

00

22

22

21

00

LoFa

t Cae

sar2

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

03

63

71

21

1

Ranc

h 1

00

00

10

12

10

12

13

13

1714

1817

1110

109

Ranc

h 2

30

67

41

810

51

911

35

37

1923

1923

2017

2931

LoFa

t Ran

ch 1

88

610

2012

1620

2112

1620

85

85

4250

4451

3943

5046

LoFa

t Ran

ch 2

79

88

3625

3529

3625

3529

1217

1217

5247

5549

1816

1114

Cata

lina

10

10

00

10

00

10

00

00

00

10

20

20

0

Cata

lina

24

48

828

4545

4028

4545

4020

1923

2189

8689

8670

7378

66

Blue

Che

ese

13

20

06

82

16

82

11

21

429

2229

2426

2420

19

Blue

Che

ese

25

43

611

1011

811

1211

84

54

527

2828

3120

1636

37

Blue

Che

ese

34

44

49

514

89

514

82

22

240

4041

4427

2029

40

Zest

y Ita

lian

11

20

12

30

22

30

20

00

04

44

47

85

4

Zest

y Ita

lian

20

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

04

34

33

41

3

Medium Level

Caes

ar 1

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Caes

ar 2

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

79

711

96

66

LoFa

t Cae

sar 1

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

910

910

106

21

LoFa

t Cae

sar 2

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

1817

2021

127

109

Ranc

h 1

00

00

12

51

35

63

00

1317

6973

6973

4349

4856

Ranc

h 2

00

00

6263

6653

6565

6758

2723

3127

111

120

115

126

8193

8810

1

LoFa

t Ran

ch 1

00

00

120

113

134

120

123

117

136

123

6284

6489

226

219

231

226

200

188

206

221

LoFa

t Ran

ch 2

00

00

135

154

187

167

135

154

187

169

8993

8993

251

266

254

270

189

186

177

159

Cata

lina

10

00

02

43

33

43

30

00

08

88

811

912

13

Cata

lina

20

00

016

520

021

321

017

120

321

321

011

112

111

712

657

051

357

051

312

112

612

811

9

Blue

Che

ese

10

00

033

2921

1834

3224

189

49

4NA

NANA

NA8

86

11

Blue

Che

ese

20

00

045

6571

6945

6672

7137

3838

3814

616

615

116

816

618

013

915

8

Blue

Che

ese

30

00

060

7282

9560

7384

9842

4742

4826

625

527

026

020

022

121

622

9

Zest

y Ita

lian

10

00

025

1527

2525

1728

2515

2017

2157

6257

6448

6659

72

Zest

y Ita

lian

20

00

00

00

03

20

30

00

016

1316

1315

1819

13

* Aci

d zo

nes

Page 9: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 9

Tabl

e 3.

Sal

ad D

ress

ing

Gas

Prod

uctio

n Re

sults

Sala

d Dr

essi

ng

Lact

obac

illus

ferm

entu

mW

eiss

ella

viri

desc

ens

72 H

our 3

M™

Pet

rifilm

Aero

bic

Coun

t Pla

te72

Hou

r AP

TS S

prea

d Pl

ate

72 H

our

APTS

Pou

r Pla

te72

Hou

r M

RS72

Hou

r 3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Ae

robi

c Co

unt P

late

72 H

our

APTS

Spr

ead

Plat

e72

Hou

r AP

TS P

our P

late

72 H

our

MRS

Caes

ar 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Caes

ar 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

LoFa

t Cae

sar 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

LoFa

t Cae

sar 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Ranc

h 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Ranc

h 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

LoFa

t Ran

ch 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

LoFa

t Ran

ch 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Cata

lina

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Cata

lina

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Blue

Che

ese

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Blue

Che

ese

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Blue

Che

ese

3Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Zest

y Ita

lian

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Zest

y Ita

lian

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Tabl

e 4.

Sal

ad D

ress

ing

T-Te

st R

esul

ts

Com

paris

on

Met

hod

1 —

0.5

x 2

Rep

licat

esM

etho

d 2

— A

naly

sis

of 4

Rep

licat

es

3M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic

Coun

t Pla

te M

ean

Ref M

ean

P-Va

lue

3M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic

Coun

t Pla

te M

ean

Ref M

ean

P-Va

lue

Low Inoculum

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 4

8 ho

ur A

PTS

0.36

730.

4759

0.28

870.

4128

0.48

230.

4190

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.36

730.

6696

0.00

100.

4128

0.66

990.

0003

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS0.

4355

0.66

960.

0148

0.47

520.

6699

0.02

90

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.36

730.

8375

0.00

010.

4128

0.82

650.

0001

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS0.

4355

0.83

750.

0002

0.47

520.

8265

0.00

03

Medium Inoculum

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 4

8 ho

ur A

PTS

0.91

830.

7680

0.34

420.

8984

0.76

570.

3911

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.91

831.

4198

0.00

020.

8984

1.40

200.

0001

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

1190

1.41

980.

0075

1.15

711.

4020

0.01

59

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.91

831.

4655

0.00

000.

8984

1.47

170.

0000

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

1190

1.46

550.

0010

1.15

711.

4717

0.00

04

Page 10: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 10

Tabl

e 5.

RTE

Sal

ad R

esul

ts —

Lac

toba

cillu

s fe

rmen

tum

Dres

sing

Aero

bic

Proc

edur

e fo

r Lac

tic A

cid

Bact

eria

with

3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Aer

obic

Cou

nt P

late

s (0

.5m

L)AP

TS (1

.0m

L)M

RS (1

.0m

L)

24 H

our*

48 H

our*

72 H

our*

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

Repl

icat

e

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

AB

AB

AB

Low Level

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

15

47

16

68

76

88

718

2120

2715

1916

19

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

23

62

45

88

96

88

919

1920

2118

1514

20

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

33

44

38

810

98

810

919

3220

3717

1921

18

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

13

57

29

810

79

1110

736

2939

3019

2328

23

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

23

48

48

1212

88

1213

822

1724

1822

1624

21

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

34

26

34

810

84

811

812

2519

2923

1219

26

Mac

aron

i 15

44

89

69

99

69

1017

2524

2617

2020

16

Mac

aron

i 23

711

88

915

118

915

1256

4663

5520

2727

21

Mac

aron

i 33

23

25

45

76

55

830

2731

3019

2822

24

Bean

16

43

411

55

911

55

925

3127

3220

2421

21

Bean

27

67

513

710

1513

710

1718

1919

2118

2718

20

Bean

33

64

714

911

1214

911

1226

3230

3432

2226

20

Cole

slaw

13

56

64

67

84

78

821

1928

2216

2221

20

Cole

slaw

24

63

49

78

79

78

718

2119

2219

2623

28

Cole

slaw

37

21

211

98

1011

1010

1018

2822

2920

2016

19

Medium Level

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

122

1926

2876

7166

7076

7169

7121

022

621

723

712

814

014

113

6

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

241

4030

2986

8081

6686

8281

7029

429

130

329

718

619

916

817

9

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

336

3326

3162

7170

7862

7170

7828

525

928

827

316

016

614

114

7

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

140

3627

2974

8996

9077

9196

9028

726

729

727

521

122

620

019

7

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

229

2431

3066

7074

7066

7074

7222

426

326

923

220

620

118

719

9

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

333

2826

2088

7981

8088

8081

8125

722

926

623

718

820

116

618

0

Mac

aron

i 136

4240

2779

7866

6979

7866

6919

621

922

319

819

619

118

817

2

Mac

aron

i 244

3936

4166

5871

7067

5973

7050

449

753

952

119

618

817

618

9

Mac

aron

i 326

2420

1949

5955

6349

6056

6323

023

224

223

820

221

820

620

0

Bean

111

1721

2064

4951

5465

4954

5522

420

122

624

218

615

820

118

6

Bean

236

3130

2679

8281

7682

8281

7721

619

120

122

315

516

114

617

2

Bean

319

2224

3466

6059

7166

6160

7223

617

820

824

517

719

216

118

9

Cole

slaw

131

2926

3059

4963

6659

5263

6617

921

022

119

012

010

810

910

0

Cole

slaw

236

3718

2281

8090

7781

8090

7718

219

520

620

514

616

612

914

6

Cole

slaw

320

2622

2366

6960

6167

7061

6417

720

120

918

211

010

611

911

1

* Aci

d zo

nes

Page 11: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 11

Tabl

e 6.

RTE

Sal

ad R

esul

ts —

Wei

ssel

la v

iride

scen

s

Dres

sing

Aero

bic

Proc

edur

e fo

r Lac

tic A

cid

Bact

eria

with

3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Aer

obic

Cou

nt P

late

s (0

.5m

L)AP

TS (1

.0m

L)M

RS (1

.0m

L)

24 H

our*

48 H

our*

72 H

our*

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

Repl

icat

e

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

AB

AB

AB

Low Level

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

13

31

23

52

33

52

38

713

88

47

5

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

22

24

15

55

15

55

116

1216

1217

1318

20

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

33

42

15

77

25

77

217

2317

2513

1216

16

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

12

14

34

25

74

35

814

1414

1510

1010

11

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

21

22

53

46

103

46

1012

1312

1915

616

12

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

31

10

32

11

42

11

413

1413

149

1413

13

Mac

aron

i 11

10

11

32

21

32

24

24

24

32

2

Mac

aron

i 21

11

11

32

11

33

13

43

48

86

7

Mac

aron

i 30

12

30

44

10

44

15

55

53

55

5

Bean

17

11

28

42

38

42

320

1323

1316

1318

19

Bean

21

40

04

73

04

73

011

1014

109

108

7

Bean

32

21

14

46

54

46

526

2226

2213

2120

16

Cole

slaw

10

01

00

01

00

01

03

23

23

21

2

Cole

slaw

20

20

01

20

11

21

18

88

88

117

8

Cole

slaw

30

00

04

00

04

00

01

42

50

11

3

Medium Level

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

114

1626

2048

3245

3850

3245

3964

7764

7710

811

196

110

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

221

1926

1941

4140

3943

4440

3913

515

314

815

388

9195

96

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

320

2224

2249

5650

5150

5650

5116

115

818

115

876

8381

87

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

121

1616

2630

3338

4334

3338

4312

410

912

410

911

310

489

101

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

220

1916

1936

3841

4036

3841

4011

812

211

812

211

711

611

110

8

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

313

1719

1629

3635

2733

3635

2717

015

117

015

182

8780

77

Mac

aron

i 17

1210

926

2919

2026

3019

2155

6655

5622

2830

31

Mac

aron

i 212

169

1720

2630

1920

2830

1967

7867

8140

3642

31

Mac

aron

i 313

1518

2223

2934

3023

3134

3246

3653

3931

3630

32

Bean

118

1926

1929

3332

3629

3332

3614

316

115

216

162

6970

78

Bean

216

1313

1621

2933

4022

2933

4110

711

410

711

477

8176

88

Bean

318

2020

2519

2729

3019

2830

3220

418

520

019

111

510

811

010

1

Cole

slaw

16

313

66

613

146

613

1620

2321

2617

1310

19

Cole

slaw

211

1718

1613

2430

2813

2430

2897

8310

697

4240

4639

Cole

slaw

314

1411

1419

2121

2220

2223

2227

3035

3841

4540

40

* Aci

d zo

nes

Page 12: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 12

Tabl

e 7.

RTE

Sal

ad G

as P

rodu

ctio

n Re

sults

RTE

Sala

d

Lact

obac

illus

ferm

entu

mW

eiss

ella

viri

desc

ens

72 H

our 3

M™

Pet

rifilm

Aero

bic

Coun

t Pla

te72

Hou

r AP

TS P

our P

late

72 H

our

MRS

72 H

our 3

M™

Pet

rifilm

Aero

bic

Coun

t Pla

te72

Hou

r AP

TS P

our P

late

72 H

our

MRS

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Mus

tard

Pot

ato

3Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Amer

ican

Pot

ato

3Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Mac

aron

i 1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Mac

aron

i 2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Mac

aron

i 3Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Bean

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Bean

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Bean

3Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Cole

slaw

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Cole

slaw

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Cole

slaw

3Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Tabl

e 8.

RTE

Sal

ad T

-Tes

t Res

ults

Com

paris

on

Met

hod

1 —

0.5

x 2

Rep

licat

esM

etho

d 2

— A

naly

sis

of 4

Rep

licat

es

3M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic

Coun

t Pla

te M

ean

Ref M

ean

P-Va

lue

3M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic

Coun

t Pla

te M

ean

Ref M

ean

P-Va

lue

Low Inoculum

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 4

8 ho

ur A

PTS

0.92

291.

1523

0.00

000.

9479

1.13

850.

0000

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.92

291.

1866

0.00

000.

9479

1.18

250.

0000

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS0.

9670

1.17

830.

0000

0.95

581.

1825

0.00

00

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.92

291.

0813

0.00

580.

9479

1.09

210.

0002

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS0.

9670

1.10

280.

0066

0.95

581.

0921

0.00

02

Medium Inoculum

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 4

8 ho

ur A

PTS

1.91

642.

1540

0.00

001.

9499

2.15

570.

0000

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

1.91

642.

1782

0.00

001.

9499

2.17

530.

0000

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

9515

2.17

820.

0000

1.95

712.

1753

0.00

00

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

1.91

641.

9965

0.00

541.

9499

1.98

860.

1109

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

9515

1.98

080.

2831

1.95

711.

9886

0.19

26

Page 13: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 13

Tabl

e 9.

RTE

Mea

t Res

ults

Mea

tOr

gani

sm

Aero

bic

Proc

edur

e fo

r Lac

tic A

cid

Bact

eria

with

3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Aer

obic

Cou

nt P

late

s (0

.5m

L)AP

TS (1

.0m

L)M

RS (1

.0m

L)

24 H

our*

48 H

our*

72 H

our*

48 H

our

72 H

our

72 H

our

Repl

icat

e

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

AB

AB

Low Level

O/R

Turk

ey 1

Lact

obac

illus

00

00

10

01

21

11

43

76

87

O/R

Turk

ey 2

Lact

obac

illus

00

00

30

21

31

31

46

99

65

O/R

Chic

ken

2La

ctob

acill

us0

00

00

10

11

10

23

45

67

4

O/R

Turk

ey 1

Wei

ssel

la0

00

03

64

34

65

515

1217

1215

11

O/R

Turk

ey 2

Wei

ssel

la0

00

05

78

85

89

819

2221

2211

13

O/R

Chic

ken

2W

eiss

ella

00

00

69

1110

610

1312

1826

1831

1514

Smok

ed H

am 1

Natu

ral C

onta

min

atio

n11

67

511

66

1014

68

1069

5370

5635

32

Smok

ed H

am 2

Natu

ral C

onta

min

atio

n0

00

06

911

67

1111

880

7784

8017

17

Roas

t Bee

f 1Na

tura

l Con

tam

inat

ion

00

00

65

34

66

56

1518

1719

1517

Roas

t Bee

f 2Na

tura

l Con

tam

inat

ion

00

00

1011

87

1211

97

2023

2123

2835

O/R

Chic

ken

1Na

tura

l Con

tam

inat

ion

00

00

67

77

69

77

3530

4033

2520

Medium Level

O/R

Turk

ey 1

Lact

obac

illus

00

00

1521

2017

1624

2019

4650

4954

4639

O/R

Turk

ey 2

Lact

obac

illus

00

00

1822

2417

2022

2419

6160

6561

5451

O/R

Chic

ken

2La

ctob

acill

us0

00

010

1113

1012

1415

1028

3229

3226

26

O/R

Turk

ey 1

Wei

ssel

la0

00

011

1410

1711

1512

1038

3038

3126

24

O/R

Turk

ey 2

Wei

ssel

la0

00

021

2015

1921

2218

1941

4441

4430

29

O/R

Chic

ken

2W

eiss

ella

00

00

2117

1718

2420

1720

4637

4840

4140

Smok

ed H

am 1

Natu

ral C

onta

min

atio

n0

00

00

00

069

8889

9562

757

062

757

034

239

9

Smok

ed H

am 2

Natu

ral C

onta

min

atio

n0

00

066

8277

7566

8378

8079

879

879

879

812

011

2

Roas

t Bee

f 1Na

tura

l Con

tam

inat

ion

00

00

3945

5152

4145

5353

155

161

158

171

130

121

Roas

t Bee

f 2Na

tura

l Con

tam

inat

ion

00

00

6669

8180

7069

8380

177

185

184

191

135

139

O/R

Chic

ken

1Na

tura

l Con

tam

inat

ion

00

00

6050

4655

6055

4757

131

129

135

131

136

126

* Aci

d zo

nes

Page 14: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 14

Tabl

e 10

. RTE

Mea

t Gas

Pro

duct

ion

Resu

lts

RTE

Mea

t

Lact

obac

illus

ferm

entu

mW

eiss

ella

viri

desc

ens

72 H

our 3

M™

Pet

rifilm

Aero

bic

Coun

t Pla

te72

Hou

r AP

TS P

our P

late

72 H

our

MRS

72 H

our 3

M™

Pet

rifilm

Aero

bic

Coun

t Pla

te72

Hou

r AP

TS P

our P

late

72 H

our

MRS

O/R

Turk

ey 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

O/R

Turk

ey 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

O/R

Chic

ken

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

RTE

Mea

tNa

tura

l Con

tam

inat

ion

Smok

ed H

am 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Smok

ed H

am 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Roas

t Bee

f 1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Roas

t Bee

f 2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

O/R

Chic

ken

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Tabl

e 11

. RTE

Mea

t T-T

est R

esul

ts

Com

paris

on

Met

hod

1 —

0.5

x 2

Rep

licat

esM

etho

d 2

— A

naly

sis

of 4

Rep

licat

es

3M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic

Coun

t Pla

te M

ean

Ref M

ean

P-Va

lue

3M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic

Coun

t Pla

te M

ean

Ref M

ean

P-Va

lue

Low Inoculum

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 4

8 ho

ur A

PTS

0.88

741.

1959

0.00

150.

8646

1.20

700.

0003

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.88

741.

2937

0.00

030.

8646

1.29

380.

0002

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS0.

9814

1.29

370.

0008

0.98

321.

2938

0.00

03

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.88

741.

1144

0.00

470.

8646

1.13

520.

0127

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS0.

9814

1.11

440.

0017

0.98

321.

1352

0.02

74

Medium Inoculum

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 4

8 ho

ur A

PTS

1.58

821.

9921

0.12

781.

5815

1.99

630.

1186

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

1.58

822.

0044

0.11

581.

5815

2.00

820.

1077

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

7758

2.00

440.

0148

1.80

272.

0082

0.01

18

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

1.58

821.

8460

0.28

861.

5815

1.83

820.

2952

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

7758

1.84

600.

1480

1.80

271.

8382

0.37

81

Page 15: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 15

Tabl

e 12

. Raw

Mea

t Res

ults

Mea

tOr

gani

sm

Aero

bic

Proc

edur

e fo

r Lac

tic A

cid

Bact

eria

with

3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Aer

obic

Cou

nt P

late

s (0

.5m

L)AP

TS (1

.0m

L)M

RS (1

.0m

L)

24 H

our*

48 H

our*

72 H

our*

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

Repl

icat

e

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

AB

AB

AB

Low Level

Grou

nd T

urke

y 1

NC0

00

05

34

45

35

6TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Grou

nd T

urke

y 2

NC0

00

013

1714

1519

1817

16TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Chic

ken

1NC

00

00

01

01

01

01

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

Chic

ken

2NC

00

00

54

41

54

53

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

Grou

nd B

eef 1

NC0

00

09

811

1211

913

15TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Grou

nd B

eef 2

NC0

00

04

36

75

46

9TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Stea

k 1

NC0

00

09

146

712

1718

15TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Stea

k 2

NC0

00

05

75

56

95

7TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Medium Level

Grou

nd T

urke

y 1

NC0

00

010

1012

1512

1213

15TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Grou

nd T

urke

y 2

NC0

00

041

3037

4047

3337

41TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Chic

ken

1NC

00

00

76

56

86

56

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

Chic

ken

2NC

00

00

1717

1513

3531

3940

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

TNTC

Grou

nd B

eef 1

NC0

00

00

00

011

413

114

612

3TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Grou

nd B

eef 2

NC0

00

011

2017

2451

5355

46TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Stea

k 1

NC0

00

046

4137

3249

4140

32TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

Stea

k 2

NC0

00

027

2426

2830

3126

29TN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TCTN

TC

* Aci

d zo

nes

NC=

Nat

ural

Con

tam

inat

ion

TNTC

= T

o Nu

mer

ous

to C

ount

Tabl

e 13

. Raw

Mea

t Gas

Pro

duct

ion

Resu

lts

Raw

Mea

t

Natu

ral C

onta

min

atio

n

72 H

our 3

M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te72

Hou

r APT

S Po

ur P

late

72 H

our M

RS

Grou

nd T

urke

y 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Grou

nd T

urke

y 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Chic

ken

1Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Chic

ken

2Po

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

ePo

sitiv

e

Grou

nd B

eef 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Grou

nd B

eef 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Stea

k 1

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Stea

k 2

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Page 16: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 16

Tabl

e 14

. Sta

inle

ss S

teel

Env

ironm

enta

l Res

ults

— L

acto

baci

llus

ferm

entu

m

Sam

ple

Dilu

ent

Aero

bic

Proc

edur

e fo

r Lac

tic A

cid

Bact

eria

with

3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Aer

obic

Cou

nt P

late

s (0

.5m

L)AP

TS (0

.25m

L)AP

TS (1

.0m

L)M

RS (1

.0m

L)

24 H

our

48 H

our*

72 H

our*

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

Repl

icat

e

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

AB

AB

AB

AB

AB

Low Level

Swab

1N

Buffe

r0

00

05

48

65

58

65

49

811

522

1115

1722

17

Swab

2N

Buffe

r0

00

07

911

137

911

138

817

76

622

2421

2231

40

Swab

3N

Buffe

r0

00

011

1012

1511

1112

154

78

1315

1629

3227

2527

25

Swab

4N

Buffe

r0

00

015

1614

1315

1615

1310

820

1611

1123

2220

1938

29

Swab

5N

Buffe

r0

00

09

138

1010

138

115

910

1711

1122

2130

3219

16

Swab

6N

Buffe

r0

00

07

75

67

75

63

45

87

715

1314

1411

13

Swab

7N

Buffe

r0

00

08

98

88

68

75

310

68

817

1618

2018

19

Swab

8N

Buffe

r0

00

04

47

75

47

73

35

64

58

1012

1116

19

Medium Level

Swab

1N

Buffe

r0

00

028

6060

6756

6059

6739

4039

4012

211

112

211

110

011

810

710

0

Swab

2N

Buffe

r0

00

020

8138

3940

4138

3919

1919

1966

8166

8190

9290

81

Swab

3N

Buffe

r0

00

017

3029

4033

3028

4022

2222

2281

7781

7791

7772

72

Swab

4N

Buffe

r0

00

014

3538

3028

3637

3216

1616

1649

5549

5550

5155

70

Swab

5N

Buffe

r0

00

030

5959

6360

5959

6328

2528

2510

699

106

9995

109

9199

Swab

6N

Buffe

r0

00

019

3945

3738

3945

3718

2218

2275

7975

7978

7758

71

Swab

7N

Buffe

r0

00

014

2925

2528

2925

2515

1715

1770

6370

6366

7560

72

Swab

8N

Buffe

r0

00

018

4050

5337

4050

5325

2725

2798

9698

9610

092

8877

Low Level

Swab

9Le

thee

n0

00

06

78

116

710

115

38

57

1013

2014

2015

15

Swab

10

Leth

een

00

00

1012

139

1013

139

66

1111

129

2419

1920

1611

Swab

11

Leth

een

00

00

812

1016

912

1016

89

1618

1313

2725

2622

2530

Swab

12

Leth

een

00

00

67

55

67

66

42

75

78

1517

1822

3124

Swab

13

Leth

een

00

00

1110

1210

1110

1510

76

1312

1616

3231

3330

3433

Swab

14

Leth

een

00

00

78

1818

87

810

65

119

97

1814

3019

2126

Swab

15

Leth

een

00

00

98

1110

98

1010

65

129

88

1717

2227

2423

Swab

16

Leth

een

00

00

1211

119

1211

119

55

1010

87

1613

1516

1920

Medium Level

Swab

9Le

thee

n0

00

050

3941

4450

3841

4425

2525

2576

7176

7166

6772

75

Swab

10

Leth

een

00

00

3335

3936

3334

3836

1415

1415

5952

5952

4849

5037

Swab

11

Leth

een

00

00

2825

2930

2825

2930

1517

1517

6971

6971

5666

7273

Swab

12

Leth

een

00

00

4143

4440

4143

4440

2020

2020

8977

8977

8066

6953

Swab

13

Leth

een

00

00

3633

3532

3633

3532

1514

1514

5863

5863

8190

5973

Swab

14

Leth

een

00

00

3327

2526

3327

2526

1211

1211

4037

4037

7776

5550

Swab

15

Leth

een

00

00

2526

2630

2526

2630

1312

1312

6664

6664

7270

6955

Swab

16

Leth

een

00

00

3430

3039

3430

3039

1819

1819

5666

5666

6659

7170

* Aci

d zo

nes

Page 17: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 17

Tabl

e 15

. Sta

inle

ss S

teel

Env

ironm

enta

l Res

ults

— W

eiss

ella

viri

desc

ens

Sam

ple

Dilu

ent

Aero

bic

Proc

edur

e fo

r Lac

tic A

cid

Bact

eria

with

3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Aer

obic

Cou

nt P

late

s (0

.5m

L)AP

TS (0

.25m

L)AP

TS (1

.0m

L)M

RS (1

.0m

L)

24 H

our

48 H

our*

72 H

our*

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

48 H

our

72 H

our

Repl

icat

e

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

CD

AB

AB

AB

AB

AB

AB

Low Level

Swab

1N

Buffe

r0

00

01

21

31

23

31

11

25

105

107

812

13

Swab

2N

Buffe

r0

00

04

41

25

41

20

00

05

65

66

910

19

Swab

3N

Buffe

r0

00

03

01

13

01

30

00

04

75

78

119

12

Swab

4N

Buffe

r0

00

00

01

10

02

10

00

212

1112

1215

1316

17

Swab

5N

Buffe

r0

00

01

00

01

00

03

33

310

410

46

611

10

Swab

6N

Buffe

r0

00

00

01

00

01

11

21

211

1311

1311

1110

12

Swab

7N

Buffe

r0

00

01

01

01

11

00

10

126

2226

2217

2123

19

Swab

8N

Buffe

r0

00

02

86

64

108

81

11

38

58

56

44

9

Medium Level

Swab

1N

Buffe

r0

00

00

820

170

1229

226

616

1649

5849

5831

3431

59

Swab

2N

Buffe

r0

00

09

107

711

108

80

00

023

2623

2722

1731

20

Swab

3N

Buffe

r0

00

013

1015

2115

1622

218

88

826

4326

4335

2735

27

Swab

4N

Buffe

r0

00

04

87

34

87

33

64

610

1911

1914

2215

27

Swab

5N

Buffe

r0

00

09

1213

1310

1315

142

52

621

2821

2933

3133

31

Swab

6N

Buffe

r0

00

011

79

1614

1013

161

41

417

917

922

2123

28

Swab

7N

Buffe

r0

00

015

911

1319

1014

132

46

424

1724

1728

3128

34

Swab

8N

Buffe

r0

00

03

13

23

25

20

00

119

59

514

1316

15

Low Level

Swab

9Le

thee

n0

00

00

08

20

19

31

21

311

1111

1316

1411

9

Swab

10

Leth

een

00

00

03

33

14

34

20

20

139

139

1111

78

Swab

11

Leth

een

00

00

01

24

01

45

11

11

137

137

2120

1415

Swab

12

Leth

een

00

00

03

66

15

139

10

10

1725

1725

1921

1922

Swab

13

Leth

een

00

00

07

1010

312

1314

33

35

3031

3231

2619

3130

Swab

14

Leth

een

00

00

04

54

08

58

01

02

1815

1816

1718

1724

Swab

15

Leth

een

00

00

114

107

218

1511

55

55

2122

2423

2124

2232

Swab

16

Leth

een

00

00

00

32

00

42

00

20

08

48

59

415

Medium Level

Swab

9Le

thee

n0

00

02

55

43

75

41

31

38

108

1010

1316

13

Swab

10

Leth

een

00

00

28

34

310

56

11

12

116

116

158

1510

Swab

11

Leth

een

00

00

014

1216

317

1319

54

54

1720

1720

2514

4733

Swab

12

Leth

een

00

00

00

113

50

145

34

34

1918

1919

117

1228

Swab

13

Leth

een

00

00

21

32

21

32

00

10

54

54

97

37

Swab

14

Leth

een

00

00

30

711

54

911

00

00

515

515

46

1213

Swab

15

Leth

een

00

00

20

31

42

42

01

01

1312

1312

106

1221

Swab

16

Leth

een

00

00

10

04

12

15

11

23

68

128

66

213

* Aci

d zo

nes

Page 18: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 18

Tabl

e 16

. Sta

inle

ss S

teel

Env

ironm

enta

l Gas

Pro

duct

ion

Resu

lts

Envi

ronm

enta

ls

Lact

obac

illus

ferm

entu

mW

eiss

ella

viri

desc

ens

72 H

our 3

M™

Pet

rifilm

Aero

bic

Coun

t Pla

te72

Hou

r AP

TS S

prea

d Pl

ate

72 H

our

APTS

Pou

r Pla

te72

Hou

r M

RS72

Hou

r 3M

™ P

etrifi

lm™

Ae

robi

c Co

unt P

late

72 H

our

APTS

Spr

ead

Plat

e72

Hou

r AP

TS P

our P

late

72 H

our

MRS

1 D/

E Ne

utra

lizin

g Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

2 D/

E Ne

utra

lizin

g Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

3 D/

E Ne

utra

lizin

g Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

4 D/

E Ne

utra

lizin

g Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

5 D/

E Ne

utra

lizin

g Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

6 D/

E Ne

utra

lizin

g Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

7 D/

E Ne

utra

lizin

g Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

8 D/

E Ne

utra

lizin

g Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

1 Le

thee

n Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

2 Le

thee

n Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

3 Le

thee

n Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

4 Le

thee

n Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

5 Le

thee

n Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

6 Le

thee

n Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

7 Le

thee

n Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

8 Le

thee

n Br

oth

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Posi

tive

Tabl

e 17

. Sta

inle

ss S

teel

Env

ironm

enta

l T-T

est R

esul

ts

Com

paris

on

Met

hod

1 —

0.5

x 2

Rep

licat

esM

etho

d 2

— A

naly

sis

of 4

Rep

licat

es

3M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic

Coun

t Pla

te M

ean

Ref M

ean

P-Va

lue

3M™

Pet

rifilm

™ A

erob

ic

Coun

t Pla

te M

ean

Ref M

ean

P-Va

lue

Low Inoculum

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 4

8 ho

ur A

PTS

0.98

120.

9772

0.96

20.

8932

0.98

160.

3253

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.98

121.

1636

0.00

570.

8932

1.15

730.

0005

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

0293

1.16

360.

0453

0.95

501.

1573

0.00

23

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.98

121.

2553

0.00

030.

8932

1.23

120.

0000

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

0293

1.25

530.

0012

0.95

501.

2312

0.00

01

Medium Inoculum

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 4

8 ho

ur A

PTS

0.98

121.

491

0.00

000.

8932

1.49

660.

0000

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.98

121.

5133

0.00

000.

8932

1.50

280.

0000

48 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

0293

1.50

170.

0000

0.95

501.

5028

0.00

00

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur A

PTS

0.98

121.

5245

0.00

000.

8932

1.55

030.

0000

72 h

our 3

M P

etrifi

lm A

erob

ic C

ount

Pla

te v

s. 7

2 ho

ur M

RS1.

0293

1.52

450.

0000

0.95

501.

5503

0.00

00

Page 19: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

Page 19

Page 20: A Comparative Evaluation of the Aerobic Procedure for Lactic Acid ...

3M and Petrifilm are trademarks of 3M. Used under license in Canada.70-2009-9494-8