A Baseline Assessment of Australia’s Offshore Oil and Gas ...

12
A Baseline Assessment of Australia’s Offshore Oil and Gas Decommissioning Liability 1

Transcript of A Baseline Assessment of Australia’s Offshore Oil and Gas ...

A Baseline Assessment of Australia’s Offshore Oil and Gas Decommissioning Liability
1
Executive Summary
gas industry is facing a significant
decommissioning portfolio over the
for earlier abandonment activities
given changing market conditions.
Advisian has been commissioned
liability for equipment in Australia’s
offshore areas and to identify the
quantum of potential cost savings
across the supply chain. The
assessment is funded by NERA and
seven operators (BHP, Chevron,
Cooper Energy, ExxonMobil, Santos,
Woodside). The assessment extends
Australia, including those under non-
funding operator responsibility.
supported assessment of Australia’s
offshore decommissioning liability
step towards transformation of the
approach to decommissioning.
• A combined estimated liability of
USD $40.5 billion (including wells
and facilities). Well plugging and
abandonment (P&A) and pipeline
removal comprise the majority of
estimated spend.
decommissioning workload
maximise efficiency through a
is included in the body of the
relevant reports.
The Australia offshore oil and gas
industry considered under the
as summarised:
(59%), subsea development wells
appraisal wells (11%)
tonnes of topsides and 518,000
tonnes of substructures)
1 FLNG and 1 semi-submersible)
82 export and inter-field pipelines
(with an overall installed offshore
length of 4,960km)
excluding jumpers and spools)
130 static umbilicals (approximately
excluding trees;
associated with floating facilities, which
will be laid on the seabed following
removal of the associated facility.
Offshore Oil and Gas Decommissioning Liability (Australia)4
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
A S
S E
T C
O U
N T
Platform Wells
Infield Flowlines
Static Umbilicals
Subsea Structures
Figure 1 Australian offshore oil and gas asset stock by basin and typology
The per basin activity split is
summarised in Figure 1. The North
Carnarvon basin is the area with the
greatest level of decommissioning
well stock, 55% of the overall fixed
facility mass to be removed and
45% of the floating facility count.
North Carnarvon also accounts for
approximately 47% of the overall
pipeline stock and approximately
be removed.
fixed facilities (37% in mass terms) and
45% of the well stock (predominantly
platform wells). There is a high density
of inter-field and export pipelines (44),
however the overall installed length
accounts for only 18% of the overall
Australia length.
distance export trunklines to shore
(30% of the Australia wide pipeline
installed length).
combined topsides and substructure
water (<120m water depth).
is also in shallow water.
5
Platform Wells, 18%
Subsea E&A, 5%
Floating Facilities
C U
M U
L A
T IV
E L
IA B
IL IT
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 2 Australian offshore oil and gas decommissioning liability by asset typology
Cost norms and rates for
decommissioning execution strategies
aggregate liability estimate. The
defines the base quantities used for
this exercise, influences the estimate
class. As a result, elements of the
estimate may be considered of greater
accuracy, up to AACE Class 4 (-30%
/ +50%), specifically where the asset
data was directly verified by operators.
The estimate figures are real terms
2020 and presented in USD currency
for international comparison. The
liability reported captures installed
The database excludes planned
removal of all infrastructure in
alignment with the regulatory base
case as defined in Subsection 572(3)
of the Offshore Petroleum and
Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006,
recognising that other outcomes with
equivalent or lower HS&E outcomes
may be acceptable.
40.5 billion. The liability distribution
by asset type and basin is shown in
Figure 2. The estimated timeline of
decommissioning spend is shown in
Figure 3 (cumulatively).
27%
51%
59%
Wells Plugging & Abandonment
- Based on timing of first decommissioning spend
sourced from IHS Markit, or as advised by
funding operator.
Figure 3 Australian offshore oil and gas decommissioning liability timeline
The key outcomes of the liability
assessment are:
decommissioning spend at 41%
between subsea development
full removal results in a high cost of
decommissioning for pipelines /
This cost is primarily driven by the
removal cost of long-distance
• Approximately 51% of the
inclusive). A further 23% of the
liability is predicted during 2031 to
2040 (74% overall by 2040).
• Assets in North Carnarvon and
Gippsland comprise the majority
If demonstrated to be ALARP,
acceptable and compliant with
regulatory requirements, a key
below in Section 1.4. In this scenario
the well P&A component would
increase in prominence in the overall
liability distribution (from 41% to
approximately 50%).
databases as outlined below. Where
possible, a quantum of reduction that
can be targeted for key measures
has been estimated by adjusting the
work breakdown structure (basis,
decommissioning database, as
field pipeline decommissioning
pipe-ends) to leave all export and
inter-field pipelines in place gives
a 15% (USD 5.9 billion) saving on
the overall liability.
following three factors combined
(USD 4.1 billion) saving on the
overall liability:
to share lessons learned,
pre-screen wells, optimize the
execution schedule and ensure
(even mini-campaigns);
wells and a focused effort, it is
conceivable that application
(best possible performance,
optimization per well;
suitable application of new
technology could also provide
operations per well.
large jacket substructures. The
however it holds some promise
and negates the need for a heavy
lift vessel. There is a potential cost
saving opportunity of 4%.
-15% -10%
Baseline Export & Inter-Field Pipelines In-Situ
Wells P&A working group - equiv. drill to limit concept - new technology
Re-float and tow jacket substructures >3,000 tonnes
100% Local Disposal Path
M M
U S
• (USD 1.5 billion) assuming
• Asset removal and transport
accounts for approximately USD
structures from the West / North
West basins are premised on
shipment to South East Asia
for disposal due to local yard
constraints. The identification
the West coast to handle large
structures and marine spreads has
the potential to reduce the overall
decommissioning liability by 4%
decommissioning liability (USD
and marine spread mobilisation
and de-mobilisation. A campaign
approach across multiple assets
cost of equipment mobilization
decommissioning projects.
Attachment 1 show indicative
(1% saving on the overall liability
for a single campaign example).
It is reasonable to target a
3% cost reduction based on
multiple campaign opportunities
may incur disproportionately high
to society. The opportunity to leave
such sub-structures (5 in Australian
waters) in place represents a cost
saving of 0.5% (USD 0.2 billion) on
the overall liability.
overall indicative cost reduction
to 8.1 billion) on the liability,
premised on the implementation
notwithstanding additional potential
HS&E and social-economic factors to
be considered in planning the overall
asset lifecycle.
oil and gas liability is premised
on full removal of assets and
decommissioning execution of
cost reduction and socio-economic
collaboration between industry
industry (e.g. campaign partnership
chain (e.g. disposal infrastructure).
decommissioning industry in Australia
yet been done. Industry experience
built up in the next few years will help
re-target the database against ‘as-
built’ figures. However, maintaining
requires effective industry-wide
optimal cost reduction outcomes.
Advisian notes that, through the
course of this study, NERA has
identified that a tool, such as a
Decommissioning Planning System,
potential efficiency and collaboration
This system could be used to promote:
• An integrated view of
facilities results in a reduction in
activities with limited economic
dis-incentivise future sale and /
incorporating lessons learned and
leveraging activities elsewhere in
sub-industry in Australia that
supports jobs and investment.
centralized decommissioning
11
nera.org.au/CODA
DISCLAIMER
for the exclusive use of NERA, and is subject to
and issued in accordance with the agreement
between NERA and Advisian Pty Ltd. Advisian
Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility
whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or
reliance upon this report by any third party.
Copying this report without the permission of
NERA and Advisian Pty Ltd is not permitted.