A-0980 Cross Sectional Area just Proximal to the Carpal...

1
A-0980 Cross Sectional Area just Proximal to the Carpal Tunnel According to the Ulnar Variances Soo Min Cha, Hyun Dae Shin Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea Introduction § The carpal tunnel is an open compartment containing nine flexor tendons a nd the median nerve § Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) is recognized as a degenerative condition causing ulnar-sided wrist pain § We evaluated the relationship between the area around the distal radioulna r joint (DRUJ) according to the ulnar variances and the cross sectional area ( CSA) using magnetic resonance images (MRI) in this prospective study of pa tients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods § From among a total of 243 patients who had been diagnosed with CTS bet ween March 2012 and February 2017 at our hospital, 41 patients with positiv e ulnar variance were enrolled in group 1. § As control groups, 39 healthy volunteers who underwent MRI evaluations w ere included in group 2 (neutral ulnar variance) and group 3 (negative varianc e). Basic demographic data, including age, gender, and body mass index (B MI) were recorded for all three groups. § An area encompassing the contents of carpal tunnel (nerves/tendons) was designated as area “A,” and the area just beneath the subcutaneous fat was designated as area “B” at the levels of the lunate (L) and pisiform (P) on axial MRI. Ratios of these areas (“A/B at L” and “A/B at P”) were evaluated in term s of their correlations with ulnar variance. Results Conclusion § We found a positive relationship between decreased CSA around the DR UJ and positive ulnar variance on radiologic investigation. These findings s how the importance of variance in the positive ulna variance to the develop ment of CTS. § Mean age, gender, and BMI were not statistically different among the group s, respectively. § Within each group, there was no difference between “A/B at L” and “A/B at P”, respectively. § When comparing the three groups, “A/B at L” and “A/B at P” were all signific antly decreased in group 1 than in other groups. § Regardless of the group, ulnar length negatively correlated with both “A/B at L” and “A/B at P” ratios § Figure 1. Study flow chart. § Figure 2. Variation in the geometry of the distal radioulnar joint obtained from ulna variance in a cadaveric model. § Figure 3. Area “A” includes the carpal tunnel (median nerve and nine fle xors), and the ulnar nerve and its vessels at the level of the lunate (T1-w eighted axial images). At the pisiform level, the ulnar nerve and its vessel s are not seen clearly and thus were excluded from cross-sectional area measurements in all evaluations. § Area “B” lies just beneath the subcutaneous fat signal at evaluation and at the level of the respective axial images (A) “A/B at L” and “A/B at P” w ere 0.19 and 0.18, respectively, in the patient with positive ulnar variance s (group 1). (B) “A/B at L” and “A/B at P” were 0.22 and 0.20, respectivel y, in the volunteer with negative ulnar variances (group 3)..

Transcript of A-0980 Cross Sectional Area just Proximal to the Carpal...

Page 1: A-0980 Cross Sectional Area just Proximal to the Carpal ...fessh2018.com/posterview/posterlist/down/A-0980.pdf · § We evaluated the relationship between the area around the distal

A-0980 Cross Sectional Area just Proximal to the Carpal Tunnel According to the Ulnar Variances Soo Min Cha, Hyun Dae Shin Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea

Introduction §  The carpal tunnel is an open compartment containing nine flexor tendons and the median nerve §  Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) is recognized as a degenerative condition causing ulnar-sided wrist pain §  We evaluated the relationship between the area around the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) according to the ulnar variances and the cross sectional area (CSA) using magnetic resonance images (MRI) in this prospective study of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods §  From among a total of 243 patients who had been diagnosed with CTS between March 2012 and February 2017 at our hospital, 41 patients with positive ulnar variance were enrolled in group 1. §  As control groups, 39 healthy volunteers who underwent MRI evaluations were included in group 2 (neutral ulnar variance) and group 3 (negative variance). Basic demographic data, including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded for all three groups. §  An area encompassing the contents of carpal tunnel (nerves/tendons) was designated as area “A,” and the area just beneath the subcutaneous fat was designated as area “B” at the levels of the lunate (L) and pisiform (P) on axial MRI. Ratios of these areas (“A/B at L” and “A/B at P”) were evaluated in terms of their correlations with ulnar variance.

Results

Conclusion §  We found a positive relationship between decreased CSA around the DRUJ and positive ulnar variance on radiologic investigation. These findings show the importance of variance in the positive ulna variance to the development of CTS.

§  Mean age, gender, and BMI were not statistically different among the groups, respectively. §  Within each group, there was no difference between “A/B at L” and “A/B at P”, respectively. §  When comparing the three groups, “A/B at L” and “A/B at P” were all significantly decreased in group 1 than in other groups. §  Regardless of the group, ulnar length negatively correlated with both “A/B at L” and “A/B at P” ratios

§  Figure 1. Study flow chart.

§  Figure 2. Variation in the geometry of the distal radioulnar joint obtained from ulna variance in a cadaveric model.

§  Figure 3. Area “A” includes the carpal tunnel (median nerve and nine flexors), and the ulnar nerve and its vessels at the level of the lunate (T1-weighted axial images). At the pisiform level, the ulnar nerve and its vessels are not seen clearly and thus were excluded from cross-sectional area measurements in all evaluations.

§  Area “B” lies just beneath the subcutaneous fat signal at evaluation and at the level of the respective axial images (A) “A/B at L” and “A/B at P” were 0.19 and 0.18, respectively, in the patient with positive ulnar variances (group 1). (B) “A/B at L” and “A/B at P” were 0.22 and 0.20, respectively, in the volunteer with negative ulnar variances (group 3)..