9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

download 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

of 22

Transcript of 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    1/22

    N.A. ZUBERIMANAGING DIRECTOR

    PRIVATE POWER & INFRASTRUCTURE BOARD

    October 22, 2011

    CONVERSION OF EXISTINGTHERMAL POWER PLANTSTO COAL

    INTERNATIONAL COAL CONFERENCE

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    2/22

    C O N T E N T S Overview of Pakistan Power Sector

    Power Plants for Coal Conversion

    Issues on Conversion of Power Plants to Coal

    Implementation Mechanism for Converting Plants to Coal

    Key Features of Mechanism for Converting GENCOs/IPPs to Coal

    Conclusion

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    3/22

    MW %

    Public Sector

    WAPDA/SHYDO/

    NA/AJK 11,603 52PAEC 462 2

    Sub-Total 12,065 54

    Private Sector

    IPPs 8,508 38

    KESC 1,756 8

    Sub-Total 10,264 46

    G. Total 22,329 100

    Public SectorThermal

    4,900 MW

    Nuclear462 MW

    Public SectorHydel

    6,703 MW

    IPPs10,039 MW

    PAKISTAN POWER SECTORTOTAL INSTALLED CAPACITY

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    4/22

    STEAM TURBINE POWER PLANTS

    GAS TURBINE POWER PLANTS

    COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS

    RECIPROCATION ENGINES

    POWER GENERATIOINTECHNOLOGIES

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    5/22

    MARDAN

    WARSAK

    BANNU

    DAUDKHEL

    BURHANNEW RAWAT

    I.S.P.R

    MANGLA

    TARBELA

    GAKHAR

    SAHOWALA

    K.S.KAKU

    RAVI

    JAPAN

    KELN.ABAD

    SABA

    YOUSAF WALA

    VEHARI

    KAPCO

    ROUSCH

    UCH

    AES

    N.G.P.SM.GARH

    GUDDU

    LIBERTY

    DADU

    HALARD

    LAKHRA

    JAMSHORO

    KOTRI

    HUBCO

    KDA-33

    (KESC)

    500 kV Grid Station

    220 kV Grid Station

    500/220 kV Grid Station

    Hydel Power Station

    Thermal Power Station

    IPPs at 220, 500 kV

    IPPs at 132 kV

    500 kV T/LINE

    220 kV T/LINE

    (240)

    (3408)

    (1000)

    (107)

    (120)

    (195)

    (1350)

    (310)

    CHEP

    (184)

    (355)

    (1348)

    HCPC(126)

    (548)

    (1655)

    (212)

    (150)

    (850)

    (174)

    (1200)

    GAZI BAROTHA

    (1450)

    CHASNUPP

    GATTI

    BUND RD:

    M.GARHGUDDU

    JAMSHORO

    PAKISTAN POWER SECTOR TRANSMISSION SYSTEM

    G.AHMAD

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    6/22

    PAKISTAN POWER SECTORFUEL MIX (2009-10)

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    7/22

    60% power generation based on gas & furnace oil

    Gas becoming scarce

    Exorbitant cost of imported oil/HSD

    Double-edged sword of gas depletion and higher oil prices

    resulted in huge circular debt running in billions

    The panacea lies in converting thermal power plants to cheaper

    fuels such as coal

    EXISTING POWER SECTOR SITUATION

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    8/22

    For conventional steam turbine thermal units, the possible option

    is to convert them to coal

    The benefit of converting the furnace oil plants would be through

    savings on fuel cost component

    Expedite import of gas or use alternative fuels available such as

    LNG for gas turbine or reciprocating engine

    POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS TO IMPROVEPAKISTAN SECTOR

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    9/22

    CANDIDATE PLANTS FOR COAL CONVERSIONCapacity (MW)

    Installed Derated

    JAMSHORO 850 675

    Guddu unit 3,4* 640 580

    M.Garh 1370 1130

    SPS faisalabad 1,2* 132 100

    NGPS Multan Unit 1,2,3 195 120Sub Total GENCOs 3187 2605

    HUBCO Unit 1,2,3,4 1292 1200

    AES Lalpir 362 348

    AES Pakgen 362 348

    SABA Power 134 126

    Sub-Total IPPs 2150 2022

    Total 5337 4627

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    10/22

    Involvement of new Capital Costs Outage time to dismantle old boilers and

    assemble/commission new ones

    Additional auxiliary consumption thereby reducing the net

    generation capacity

    Higher O&M costs

    Limitation of space for coal storage & ash handling

    Probable reduction of efficiency

    Availability of coal, and

    Environment degradation

    ISSUES ON CONVERSION OF STEAMPOWER PLANTS TO COAL

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    11/22

    Conversion of GENCOs plants to cheaper fuels is

    visualized through induction of private sector

    contractor(s) in Public Sector Power Stations (concept

    approved)

    IPPs conversion is visualized through devising a

    Policy Regime (in process of approval)

    IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM FORCONVERSION TO CHEAPER FUELS

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    12/22

    CONVERSION OF GENCOs TO CHEAPER FUEL THROUGHINDUCTION OF PRIVATE SECTOR GENERATION

    KEY FEATURES Induction of O&M Contractor for 10 years through open bidding

    No retrenchment of existing staff;

    No capital expenditure and no payment of mobilization advance by

    GENCOs / Government of Pakistan (GOP)

    No upward revision of tariff due to induction of O&M Contractor;

    Evaluation & Selection of O&M Contractor through a criteria based on

    benefit sharing, percentage of which to be determined through bidding

    process;

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    13/22

    CONVERSION OF IPPS ON CHEAPER FUELSSALIENT FEATURES IPPs to carry out due diligence/feasibility study individually for cheaper

    alternative fuels as per their technologies.

    IPPs be given one year (or less if their conversion plan require less time)

    for conversion during which they will be provided half of their Escalable

    tariff component (which covers their returns etc) and full Non-Escalable

    tariff component (which covers their debt servicing).

    Any saving that would be achieved due to switching of fuels be shared

    equally amongst the IPPs and the power purchaser.

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    14/22

    CONCLUSIONConversion of existing thermal power plants

    to coal will develop the market for new coal

    mines hence eliminate the MARKET RISK

    especially for development of Thar Coal

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    15/22

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    16/22

    THANKS

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    17/22

    US$ Billion

    Costs 1st year Benefits 1st Year Net Benefits

    GENCOs 1.180 3.599 2.419

    IPPs 0.805 2.519 1.714

    Total 1.985 6.118 4.133

    PROBABLE BENEFITS FROM CONVERSION OFSUITABLE CANDIDATE PROJECTS TO COAL

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    18/22

    BACKUP SLIDES

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    19/22

    CONVERSION ON CHEAPER FUELSSALIENT FEATURES Power Purchaser be allowed to legalize the arrangement and any

    extensions in the Term of Power Purchase Agreements with IPPs pursuant

    to 1994 Policy through Side Agreements without requiring any approval

    from any government agency / regulator. For IPPs pursuant to 2002 Policy

    necessary permission of regular shall be needed.

    Power Purchaser to have right to negotiate and schedule outage timings

    and number of units at a time for conversion, as well as fix priority of IPPs

    if more than one IPP approach to it for conversion, and the feasibility study

    favours one over the other.

    Customs duty at the rate of 5% on the import of equipment, machinery and

    spares for carrying out Balancing, Modernization and Replacement (BMR).

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    20/22

    PRE-DEVELOPMENT OF COAL MARKET A BASIC

    INGREDIENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SINDH COAL

    Conversion of existing thermal power plants will pre-develop the

    market for new coal mines hence eliminating the MARKET RISK

    especially for development of Thar Coal. As such we expect fullest

    support of GOS in our venture.

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    21/22

    COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS (GENCOS)

    Costs

    Capital Cost US$ 1.15 billion

    Increase in O& M expenses US$ 0.032 billion

    Environmental mitigation cost (10% of total O&M) US$ 0.001 billion

    Total Costs US$ 1.180 billion

    Benefits

    Fuel Cost Saving using imported coal US$ 3.599 billion

    Net Benefits US$ 2.419 billion

  • 7/28/2019 9-Mr. N. A Zuberi

    22/22

    COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS (IPPS)Costs

    Capital Cost US$ 0.774 billion

    Increase in O& M expenses US$ 0.030 billion

    Environmental mitigation cost (10% of total O&M) US$ 0.001 billion

    Total Costs US$ 0.805 billion

    Benefits

    Fuel Cost Saving using imported coal US$ 2.519 billion

    Net Benefits US$ 1.714 billion