~9 couNrp ~~~~`'' ''~~ SAN FRANCISCO ~o-~~'~ a PLANNING ...sfmea.sfplanning.org/1144-1150 Harrison...
Transcript of ~9 couNrp ~~~~`'' ''~~ SAN FRANCISCO ~o-~~'~ a PLANNING ...sfmea.sfplanning.org/1144-1150 Harrison...
-
~9 couNrp
~~~~`'' ''~~ SAN FRANCISCO~o-~~'~ a PLANNING DEPARTMENTlba.,~~~:..o ~~,
3S , ~ p7
Certificate of DeterminationCommunity Plan Evaluation
Case No.: 2016-001738ENV
Project Address: 1144-1150 Harrison Street
Zoning: Western SoMa Mixed Use -General (WMUG) District
Western SoMa Special Use District
55/65-X Height and Bulk District
Block/Lot: 3755/023
Lot Size: 75,625 square feet
Plan Area: Western SoMa Community Plan
Project Sponsor: Scott Youdall, 1140 Harrison Associates, LP, (925) 490-2990
Staff Contact: Alesia Hsiao, (415) 575-9044, [email protected]
~:Z~~rx~~►~~~~~~~~~
The project site is located midblock along the north side of Harrison Street, between 8th Street andLangton Street, in San Francisco's South of Market neighborhood. The project site consists of a roughlysquare-shaped parcel on the block bounded by Harrison Street to the south, 8~" Street to the west, FolsomStreet to the north and 7th Street to the east. There are several alleys in the immediate project vicinity.Berwick Place abuts the project site to the west. Hallam Street terminates at the northern boundary of theproject site, and Heron Street terminates at the western boundary of the project site. The project site iswithin the Western SoMa Light Industrial and Residential Historic District (historic district). The 75,625square foot site is currently occupied by a 25-foot tall, one-story plus mezzanine industrial buildingconstructed in 1907 that is a contributor to the historic district. The existing building varies in buildingheight at 26 feet and 6 inches along Harrison Street to 33 feet along Berwick Street and the northeastern
CEQA DETERMINATION(Continued on next page).
The project is eligible for streamlined environmental review per Section 15183 of the CaliforniaEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and California Public Resources Code Section 21083.3.
DETERMINATION
I do erebX certi hat the above determination has been made pursuant to State and Local requirements.
~,,--- ti f 19' ~ ! F~Lisa Gibson DateEnvironmental Review Officer
cc: Scott Youdall, Project Sponsor Project DistributionDoug Vu, Current Planner Historic Distribution ListSupervisor Jane Kim, District 6
1650 Mission St.Suite 400San Francisco,CA 94103-2479
Reception:415.558.6378
Fax:415.558.6409
PlanningInformation:415.558.6377
-
Certificate
PROJECTside of thbusiness buildings inventory The propoto seven‐scontainingamenity asize from units, 146private opwidened Hallam St The projeBerwick Pfloor and and six staccessiblealley wouFolsom St The projespaces, anlevel gara3,766 sf obicycle lomidblock along Hadrivewaywould reqon‐street the drivewcommercito four aloHarrison Place at Hcurb ramincludes a
1 Exceptionsfor measurethose section
of Determinatio
T DESCRIPThe building. until Augustin San Franc
y storage.
osed project wstory, 65‐foot g 341,780 squand leasing spapproximate6 two‐bedroopen space woHarrison Strtreet, and two
ct site has a gPlace, allowinthe basementories within te north‐southuld enhance treet, while al
ct would prond two servicage. The projef bicycle storounge space. passage, wit
arrison Street. at the southequest that thecommercial lway and theial loading zoong HarrisonStreet betweHarrison Streps at the intadditional tra
s from the provisement of height ins. A minor devi
on
ION (continuThe existingt 2017. The acisco, althoug
would demoltall1, approxi
uare feet (sf) opace, and 69,ely 425 sf to apom units, andould be provreet sidewalko common roo
grade change ng a courtyart level garagethe perimeterh midblock papedestrian anlso providing
ovide 172 on‐sce vehicle spaect would prorage on the gPrimary pedth pedestrian. Vehicular east corner of e San Franciscoading zone e midblock pone. The propn Street betweeen Langton et, reconstructersection of ansportation
sions of the Planin Sections 260 aiation in the mea
ued) g building coauto repair bgh it continue
lish the majorimately 430,0of residential ,547 sf of garpproximatelyd four three‐vided with prk, a 30‐foot wof decks on th
of 7.5 feet frord level at the, resulting inr of the projecassage directnd bicycle co a visual brea
site vehicle paces), as well ovide 372 Claground floor. destrian accesn access for taccess to thethe site with
co Municipal Talong the nor
passageway, aposed project een 7th Street aStreet and Bct the existingBerwick Placdemand man
nning Code with nd 261 of this Coasurement of buil
overs the entbusiness has s to use the p
rity of the exi000 gross squauses (371 unirage space. Thy 1,328 sf and ‐bedroom unirivate balconiwide public he sixth floor.
om Harrison he interior of n the buildingct site. The prtly connectingonnections beak in the mass
arking spacesas utility, trasass 1 and 41 CThe project wss for the rethe commercie basement lean 18‐foot‐wTransportatiorth side of Haand a 66‐footwould reducand 8th Streeterwick Placeg sidewalks ace and Heronnagement me
respect to heighode, and no suchlding height is al
tire parcel ansince relocatproject proper
isting masonrare foot (gsf),its), 6,600 sf ohe proposed would includ
nits. Approximies and deckmidblock pa.
Street upwarthe site to beg containing sroject would pg Hallam Stretween Harrsing of the pr
s (167 vehiclesh, and electrClass 2 bicyclewould also psidential useial uses provevel garage w
wide curb cut oon Agency (SFarrison Streett long passence the numbet, widen the se, install a raalong both sin Street. In easures such
ht are confined toh deviation shalllowed under Pla
1144-Case N
nd operated ted to other rty for limited
ry building a, mixed‐use aof commerciadwelling unide 131 studiomately 29,724ks, three commassage from H
rd to its northe inserted beseven stories provide a 30‐reet with Harrison Street, Hoject.
e spaces, threrical rooms we parking spacprovide approe would be pvided along Bwould be thon Harrison SFMTA) desigt west of the nger loadinger of travel lansidewalk fromaised crosswaides of Berwiaddition, theas providing
o minor deviatiol depart from thanning Code Sec
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
as an auto rexisting indud overflow v
and construct apartment buial uses, 12,250its would ranos, 90 one‐bed4 sf of publimon courtyaHarrison Stre
hwest corner etween the grwithin the in‐foot wide purrison Street.Hallam Stree
ee car share vwithin the baseces, approximoximately 650provided fromBerwick Placrough a propStreet. The spgnate a 52‐foodriveway betg zone west ones from fivem 8 to 15 feet alk across Beick Place, ande proposed pg car‐share pa
ons from the prohe purposes or inction 304(d)(6).
Street 38ENV
2
repair ustrial vehicle
a six‐ ilding 0 sf of nge in droom c and rds, a eet to
along round nterior ublicly . The et and
ehicle ement mately 0 sf of m the e and posed ponsor ot long tween of the lanes along erwick d add project arking
ovisions ntent of
-
Certificate
and memtime trancosts, and Constructcommencexcavationbasementto resist hhammers PROJECTThe propo San Franci
C82ex
Departmen
R
Departmen
R R R
Bay Area ASan FranciSan Franci
RH
San Franci
R
San Franci
RloB
Aco
of Determinatio
mberships, pronsportation ind providing le
tion of the prce in Novembn of approximlevel. The pr
hydrostatic upis not propos
T APPROVALosed project w
isco Planning
Conditional U23(c)(11) for axception abov
nt of Building I
Review and ap
nt of Public He
Review for comReview for comReview and ap
Air Quality Misco Fire Deparisco Departme
Review and aHarrison Stree
isco Board of S
Review and ap
isco Municipal
Review and aoading zone erwick Place.
Approval of consistency wi
on
oviding delivenformation dess accessory p
roposed projeber 2018 and bmately 52,947roposed buildplift pressuresed.
LS would require
Commission
Use (CUA) Aua major develve the base he
Inspection
pproval of dem
ealth
mpliance withmpliance withpproval of a D
Management Dirtment nt of Public W
pproval of pet sidewalk.
Supervisors
pproval of sid
l Transportatio
approval of along the n construction ith the Better
ery package ldisplays and parking than
ect would ocbe completed7 cubic yards ding would bees with the in
e the followin
uthorization plopment in theight limit of 5
molition and
h the Maher Oh article 38 of Demolition an
strict
Works
permits for re
dewalk legisla
on Agency
an on‐street orth side of
within the pStreets Plan
lockers, provinformation the neighbor
ccur for apprd by May 2021of soil to a dee supported bnstallation of
ng approvals:
pursuant to Phe Western So55‐X to the m
building perm
Ordinance, arthe Health C
nd Constructio
emoval of Un
ation to widen
commercial Harrison St
public right‐o
viding multimabout travelrhood parking
roximately 301. Project conepth of 20 feeby a structurapre‐drilled s
Planning CodoMA Special Umaximum heig
mits.
rticle 22A of thCode for enhanon Dust Cont
nderground S
n the sidewalk
loading zontreet between
of‐way (e.g.,
1144-Case N
modal wayfinl options, ung rate.
0 months, andnstruction is eet below gradal mat foundaoldier piles; u
de Sections 26Use District rght limit of 65
he Health Conced ventilattrol Plan.
Storage Tank
k on Harrison
ne and an onn the propos
sidewalk wi
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
ding signagenbundling pa
d is anticipatexpected to rede for the propation, thick enuse of pile dr
63.29, 303, 30requesting a h5‐X.
de. tion.
ks identified i
n Street.
n‐street passsed driveway
idening) to e
Street 38ENV
3
, real‐arking
ted to equire posed nough riving
04 and height
in the
senger y and
ensure
-
Certificate
San Franci
Agu
R
The condiof the 30‐San Franc
COMMUNCaliforniaprojects thor generasubject toproject‐spexaminatiparcel on the zoningsignificanpreviouslyat the timdiscussedto the proimpact.
This deteHarrison ProgrammProject (Wdeterminethe Weste
The Westpopulatiovibration;and servihazardou
As a resuIndustrialfrom 50‐Xneighborh
2 San FranciFinal Enviro2009082031, 26, 2018.
of Determinatio
isco Public Uti
Approval of auidelines.
Review and ap
itional use au‐day appeal pcisco Adminis
NITY PLAN EVa Public Resohat are consisal plan policio additional epecific significion of environwhich the prg action, genent off‐site andy identified in
me that the EId in the underoposed proje
ermination eStreet projec
matic EIR for Western SoMe if the projecern SoMa PEIR
tern SoMa PEon and housin; air quality; gce systems; bs materials; m
ult of the Wesl/Residential)X to 55/65‐X. Thood serving
sco Planning Deonmental Impactcertified Decem
on
ilities Commis
a stormwater
pproval of a d
uthorization isperiod for thisstrative Code
VALUATION ources Code stent with theies for whichenvironmentacant effects wnmental effecroject would beral plan or cd cumulativen the EIR, butIR was certifirlying EIR. Seect, then an E
valuates thect described the Western S
Ma PEIR).2 Prct would resuR.
EIR included ng; cultural angreenhouse gbiological resomineral and en
stern SoMa Coto Western The WMUG dg, commercia
partment, Westet Report (PEIR),
mber 6, 2012. Ava
sion
managemen
dewatering pe
s the Approvs CEQA exem.
OVERVIEW Section 2108 developmenh an Environal review excewhich are pecucts shall be limbe located; b)community ple impacts that which, as a ried, are deterction 15183(cEIR need not
potential pabove, and iSoMa Commuroject‐specificult in any sign
analyses of tnd paleontologas emissionsources; geolonergy resourc
ommunity PlaSoMa Mixeddistrict permil, institutiona
ern SoMa CommPlanning Deparailable online at:
nt plan that c
ermit.
val Action. Thmption determ
83.3 and CEQnt density estanmental Impaept as might uliar to the pmited to those were not analan with whicat were not dresult of subsrmined to ha) specifies that be prepared
project‐specifiincorporates nity Plan, Rezc studies wenificant enviro
the followingogical resourcs; wind and sogy and soils;ces; and agric
an, the projec‐Use ‐ Generaits residentialal, and indu
munity Plan, Rezortment Case Nos: http://www.sf‐p
complies with
he Approval Amination pur
QA Guidelinablished by exact Report (Ebe necessary
project or its se effects that:alyzed as signch the projectdiscussed in stantial new inave a more seat if an impacd for the pro
ic environmeby referencezoning of Adjaere preparedonmental imp
g environmences; transportshadow; recre; hydrology acultural and fo
ct site was rezal (WMUG) al uses and suustrial/PDR u
oning of Adjacens. 2008.0877E anplanning.org/ind
1144-Case N
h the City’s s
Action date ersuant to Sect
nes Section 1xisting zoningEIR) was certy to examine site. Section 1 a) are peculinificant effectt is consistentthe underlyinformation thevere adversect is not peculoject solely on
ental effects e informationacent Parcels, ad for the propacts that wer
ntal issues: latation and circeation; publicand water quorest resource
zoned from Sand the heighupports a flexiuses, such as
nt Parcels, and 3nd 2007.1035E, Stdex.aspx?page=1
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
stormwater d
establishes thetion 31.04(h)
5183 provideg, communitytified, shall nwhether ther
15183 specifieiar to the projts in a prior Et; c) are potening EIR; or dhat was not ke impact thanliar to the parn the basis o
of the 1144n contained iand 350 Eight oposed projere not identif
and use; aesthculation; noisc services, utiuality; hazardes.
SLR (Service/ht and bulk dible mix of smbars, restau
50 Eighth Street tate Clearinghou1893, accessed Fe
Street 38ENV
4
design
e start of the
e that y plan not be re are es that ject or EIR on ntially d) are known n that rcel or of that
4‐1150 in the Street ect to fied in
hetics; se and ilities, ds and
/Light district maller urants,
Project use No. ebruary
-
Certificate
retail, burequiring developm
Individuaproject‐levdevelopmenvironm1144‐1150SoMa PEdescribedmeasures the provievaluationCertificatecomplete
PROJECTThe squarLangton Sone‐story immediatthat frontsstory warfronts on 1900). Thinterior alinto two swest of thincludinglight inducommerci Harrison on both sExpressesclosest buMuni lineinclude thMission E
3 San FranciHarrison StrDepartment4 San FranciHarrison Str
of Determinatio
siness serviceCU authoriz
ment (R&D) fa
al projects thavel environm
ment proposamental review0 Harrison StrIR. This dete
d the impacts applicable toisions of then for the 1144e of DetermiCEQA evalua
T SETTING re‐shaped prStreet in the Splus mezzan
tely adjacent ts on Harrisonrehouse withHarrison Stre
here is a proplterations to thstories of offihe project siteg commercial,ustrial buildinial buildings.
Street is an easides of the ss (8‐Bayshoreus stops are apes near the prhe 9‐San BruExpress, 83X‐M
isco Planning Dereet, April 3, 201t, 1650 Mission Stisco Planning Dreet, August 21, 2
on
es, and lightzation. Large‐acilities are no
at could occumental evaluatal, the site, w would be rreet is consisermination aof the propo
o the project. e Planning C4‐1150 Harrisination and ation necessa
roject site is lSouth of Marknine industriato the east of tn Street. The ph mezzanine eet and a oneposed projecthe existing buice space wit. The surroun, residential, ngs, while Ha
ast‐west roadtreet. The proe, 8AX‐Bayshopproximatelyroject site incuno, 9R‐San Mid‐Market E
epartment, Comm18. This documetreet, Suite 400 a
Department, Com2017.
t manufactur‐scale commeot be permitte
r in the futurtion to determand the timequired. Thistent with, anlso finds thaosed 1144‐115The propose
Code applicabon Street proaccompanyinry for the pro
located on thket neighborhal building (1the project sitproperties acrindustrial bu‐story art gallt at 1170 Hauilding to tranth no expansinding area aroand light indallam Street
dway with fouoject site is sore “A” Expry 280 feet awalude the 12‐FBruno RapiExpress, 30‐S
munity Plan Evaent, and other cits part of Case Filmmunity Plan Ev
ring. All typeercial uses, loed within this
re under the mine if they wme of develos determinatind was encomat the Wester50 Harrison Sed project is able to the pject is requireng project‐spoposed projec
he north sidehood. The 75,1126 Harrisonte is a two‐stoross Berwick Puilding (1170lery space wiarrison Street nsform the exion of the buound the produstrial uses. and Langton
ur lanes traveserved by theress, and 8BXay near the inFolsom–Pacifid, 10‐TownsStockton, and
aluation Eligibilitted documents, le No. 2016‐0017aluation Eligibilit
es of residenoft‐style live/ws district.
Western SoMawould result inopment and ion concludempassed withrn SoMa PEIStreet projectalso consistenproject site.3,4 ed. In sum, thpecific initial ct.
e of Harrison,625‐square‐fon Street consory residentiaPlace to the w0 Harrison Stith mezzanine(Case No. 2
xisting one‐stuilding envelooject site is cha Harrison Strn Street consis
elling west, twe 27‐Bryant, 4X‐Bayshore “ntersection ofic and 19‐Polsend, 14‐Miss 45‐Union–St
ty Determination,are available for
738ENV. ty Determination
1144-Case N
ntial uses arework spaces,
a Community n further impto assess w
es that the prhin, the analyIR adequatelt, and identifnt with the zo4 Therefore, he Western Sostudy comp
n Street, betwoot project sitstructed in 19al building (cowest of the protreet construe (7 Heron St2015‐016239Etory warehouope. It is apparacterized byreet and Berwst of integrat
wo parking lan47‐Van Ness, “B” Express) f 8th and Harrk. Routes sligsion, 14R‐Mitockton. Ther
, Citywide Plannr review at the S
n, Current Planni
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
e permitted, , and research
Plan will unpacts specific whether addiroposed projysis in the Wely anticipatedfied the mitigoning controlno further CoMa PEIR anprise the ful
ween 8th Streete is occupied907). The proonstructed in oject site are aucted in 1900treet construcNV) that inv
use with mezzproximately 2y a variety ofwick Place coted residentia
nes, and sideand the Baybus lines, anrison streets. ghtly further ssion Rapid,re are bicycle
ing Analysis, 114San Francisco Pl
ing Analysis, 114
Street 38ENV
5
some h and
dergo to the itional ect at estern d and gation ls and CEQA nd this ll and
et and d by a operty 1901) a one‐) that cted in volves zanine 20 feet f uses, ontain al and
walks yshore nd the Other away 14X‐lanes
44‐1150 lanning
44‐1150
-
Certificate
on HowarEnclave), within a o POTENTIThe WestPopulatioand VibraUtilities, aHazards aThe proposite descrforecast fconsidereproposed in the We
Significanhistoric renot indiviLight Indua contribuloss of thwould noto other owould enthe vicinitsuch damresource transit imgeneratinmechanicgenerate econstructicomply wAQ‐7 woMinimizadetermineareas. Thethe projec
The Westcultural a 5 Page & Tur6 San Francis
of Determinatio
rd, Folsom, 7tSALI (Servicone‐block rad
AL ENVIRONtern SoMa PEon and Housination; Air Quand Service Sand Hazardouosed 1144‐115ribed in the Wor the Westerd the incremproject woulstern SoMa P
nt and unavoiesources, tranidually eligibustrial and Reutor to the hihe existing strot convey its soffsite historinsure that proty during dem
mage is documimpact. Tran
mpacts identifg uses, Mitigal equipmentexcessive conion activities with the Consould reduce cation Plan fored that the pe proposed prct vicinity, but
ern SoMa PEand paleontol rnbull, 1140‐1150sco Planning Dep
on
th and 8th strece/Arts/Light ius include 30
NMENTAL EFEIR includedng; Cultural auality; GreenhSystems; Biolus Material; M50 Harrison SWestern SoMrn SoMa Com
mental impactld not result iPEIR.
idable impactnsportation anble for listingesidential Hisstoric districtructure was dsignificance. Iic resources oject contractomolition and mented and rnsit ridership fied in the Wgation Measurt meets the renstruction noisis minimizedstruction Dusconstruction‐r health riskproposed buiroject would t at levels com
IR identified logical resour 0 Harrison Street Hpartment, Histori
ets. The surroIndustrial, an0‐X, 40‐X, 55‐
FFECTS d analyses of and Paleontohouse Gas Emlogical ResouMineral and EStreet project iMa PEIR andmmunity Plan.ts of the propin any new o
ts were identnd circulationg in the Califostoric Districtt, the proposedetermined nIn addition, tin the projecors use all feaconstruction,repaired. Thegenerated b
Western SoMre M‐NO‐1c equirements ose, Mitigationd to the maximst Control Orrelated air qks and hazarilding would shade nearbymmonly expe
feasible mitigrces, transpo
Historic Resource ic Resource Evalua
ounding parcnd P (Public)‐X, and 55/65‐
environmenological Resoumissions; Winurces; GeologyEnergy Resouis in conform would repre Thus, the pposed 1144‐11or substantiall
tified in the Wn, noise, air qornia Registet.5,6 Although ed project is cnot to materihe proposed ct vicinity. Masible means t, and undertaerefore, the pby the projecta PEIR. As twould ensurof the Noise On Measure M‐mum extent frdinance, andquality impacds. The shadnot shade o
y streets, sidected in urban
gation measurtation and c
Evaluation‐ Partsation Response for
cels are within) zoning dist‐X.
ntal issues incurces; Transpnd and Shadoy and Soils; Hurces; and Agance with theesent a smal
project analyz150 Harrisonly more sever
Western SoMaquality, and ser but is a conthe proposedcompatible wially impair tproject woul
Mitigation Meto avoid damake a monitorproject wouldt would not the proposedre that projecOrdinance. Si‐NO‐2a wouldfeasible. The d implementacts by requirdow fan anaoutdoor recreewalks, and pn areas.
ures to addrescirculation, n
s One and Two, Mr 1144‐1150 Harri
1144-Case N
n the WMUGtricts. Height
cluding: Lanportation and ow; RecreatioHydrology agriculture ande height, use all part of thezed in the Wn Street projecre impacts th
a PEIR for thshadow. The ntributor to td project invowith the histothe historic dd not cause aeasures M‐CPmage to the hiring program d not contribuconsiderably
d project wouct generated nince the propd ensure thatproposed proation of Mitigring a Constalysis for theeation facilitiprivate prope
ss significant noise and vib
March 2, 2017. ison Street, Febru
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
G, RED (Residand bulk dis
nd Use; AesthCirculation;
on; Public Serand Water Qud Forest Resouand density fe growth tha
Western SoMa ct. As a resulhan were iden
he following tproject buildthe Western olves demolitric district andistrict such ta significant imP‐7a and M‐Cistoric buildinto ensure thaute to any hiy contribute tuld involve nnoise from roposed project t project noiseoject is requirgation Measutruction Emise proposed pes or other prty at times w
impacts relaration, air qu
uary 28, 2018.
Street 38ENV
6
dential stricts
hetics, Noise rvices, uality; urces. for the at was PEIR lt, the ntified
topics: ding is SoMa tion of nd the that it mpact CP‐7b ngs in at any istoric to the noise‐ooftop could e from red to ure M‐ssions project public within
ted to uality,
-
Certificate
wind, biomeasures to the pro
Mi
D. CulturResources
M‐CP‐1a: Historical
M‐CP‐1b:
M‐CP‐1c: I
M‐CP‐4a: PPreliminarAssessmen
M‐CP‐4b: AccidentaArcheolog
M‐CP‐7a: PResourcesConstructi
M‐CP‐7b: MonitorinResources
of Determinatio
ological resouidentified in
oposed project
itigation Meas
ral and Paleos
DocumentatResource
Oral Histories
Interpretive P
Project‐Specifry Archeologicnt (PAR)
Procedures fol Discovery ofgical Resources
Protect Historfrom Adjacenion Activities
Construction ng Program for
on
urces, and han the Westernt.
Table 1 –
sure
ontological
tion of a
s
rogram
ic cal
or f s
rical nt
r Historical
azards and hn SoMa PEIR
– Western SoM
A
Not Applicabbuilding is a nhistoric resou
Not Applicabbuilding is a nhistoric resou
Not Applicabbuilding is a nhistoric resou
Applicable: Trequire more grade excavat
Not Applicabby implementarcheological
Applicable: Aresources are
Applicable: Hpresent in pro
hazardous maand states w
Ma PEIR Mit
Applicability
ble: The existinnot an individurce.
ble: The existinnot an individurce.
ble: The existinnot an individurce.
The project wothan five feet tion.
ble: This is suptation of M‐CPtesting.
Adjacent historpresent.
Historic resouroject vicinity.
aterials. Tablwhether the m
tigation Meas
ng dual
N
ng dual
N
ng dual
N
ould of below
PPaPM(P
perseded P‐4a,
N
ric Ttadr(1
rces are TtmrpadM
1144-Case N
le 1 below limitigation mea
sures
Com
Not Applicabl
Not Applicabl
Not Applicabl
Pursuant to thPAR, the projeagreed to impPlanning DepMitigation Me(ArcheologicaProject Mitiga
Not Applicabl
The project spto implement adjacent histodamage causerelated constru(see Project M1).
The project spto implement monitor adjacresources for dproject‐relatedactivities and damage (see PMeasure 2).
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
ists the mitigasure would
mpliance
le
le
le
he results of thect sponsor haplement the artment’s Staneasure #3 al Testing), as ation Measure
le
ponsor has agrpractices to prric resources fed by project‐uction activiti
Mitigation Meas
ponsor has agra program to ent historic damage caused constructionto repair suchProject Mitigat
Street 38ENV
7
gation apply
he as
ndard
3.
reed rotect from
es sure
reed
ed by n h tion
-
Certificate
Mi
E. Transpo
M‐TR‐1c: TOptimizatWB off‐ram
M‐TR‐4: Loading S
M‐C‐TR‐2Impact FImpacts
F. Noise a
M‐NO‐1a:Residentia
M‐NO‐1b:Sensitive U
M‐NO‐1c: Generating
M‐NO‐1d:Environm
M‐NO‐2a:Noise Con
of Determinatio
itigation Meas
ortation and C
Traffic Signal tion (8th/Harrismp)
Provision paces on Folso
: Impose DeFees to Offs
nd Vibration
Interior Noiseal Uses
Siting of NoisUses
Siting of Noisg Uses
: Open Spaceents
General Cntrol Measures
on
sure
Circulation
son/I‐80
of New om Street
evelopment set Transit
e Levels for
se‐
se‐
e in Noisy
onstruction s
A
Not applicablremoved from
Not Applicabnot involve anFolsom Streetgenerate neglfreight loadinactivities alon
Not Applicabsuperseded bSection 423, EImpact Fees aFund.
Not applicablenvironment longer a CEQ
Not applicablenvironment longer a CEQ
Applicable: Tnoise‐generat
Not applicablenvironment longer a CEQ
Applicable: Tnew construc
Applicability
le: Automobilem CEQA analy
ble: The projecny physical cht and is expectligible demandng/service vehing Folsom Stre
ble: This measuy Planning CoEastern Neighband Public Ben
le: Impacts of on the project
QA topic.
le: Impacts of on the project
QA topic.
The project proting uses.
le: Impacts of on the project
QA topic.
The project proction that could
e delay is ysis.
N
ct would hanges to ted to d for icle eet.
N
ure is ode borhoods nefits
TNai
the t is no
N
the t is no
N
oposes TacFSriapimnM
the t is no
N
oposes d generate
Tt
1144-Case N
Com
Not Applicabl
Not Applicabl
The project is Neighborhooda portion of wimprovements
Not Applicabl
Not Applicabl
The project spa noise study compliance wFrancisco GenSan Francisco requirements implementatioattenuation mproject sponsoimplement nomeasures durinoise‐generatiMitigation Me
Not Applicabl
The project spto develop and
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
mpliance
le
le
subject to Easds Tier 2 impawhich funds tras.
le
le
ponsor has prethat demonstr
with the San neral Plan and Noise Ordinawith on of noise
measures. The or has agreed toise attenuationing siting of fuing uses (Projeeasure 4).
le
ponsor has agrd implement a
Street 38ENV
8
tern act fee, ansit
epared rates
the ance
to n uture ect
reed a set
-
Certificate
Mi
M‐NO‐2b:During Pil
G. Air Qu
M‐AQ‐2: ManagemDevelopm
M‐AQ‐3: RToxic Air Sensitive R
M‐AQ‐4: SPM2.5 or TACs
M‐AQ‐6: MinimizatPollutants
M‐AQ‐7: CMinimizatRisks and
I. Wind an
M‐WS‐1: SAnalysis a
L. Biologi
M‐BI‐1a: PStatus Bird
of Determinatio
itigation Meas
Noise Controle Driving
uality
Transportatioent Strategies
ment Projects
Reduction in EContaminant
Receptors
Siting of Usesother DPM
Construction tion Plan for C
Construction Etion Plan for HHazards
nd Shadow
Screening‐Levand Wind Test
cal Resources
Pre‐Constructid Surveys
on
sure
ol Measures
on Demand for Future
Exposure to ts for New
s that Emit and Other
Emissions Criteria Air
Emissions Health
el Wind ting
s
ion Special‐
A
excessive con
Not Applicabinclude pile‐d
Not Applicabnot generate mvehicle trips.
Not Applicabsuperseded bCode Article 3Exposure Zon
Not Applicabconstruction anot result in s
Not Applicabnot exceed thconstruction tsignificance.
Applicable: Tconstruction iquality.
Not Applicabnot exceed 80
Applicable: Tbuilding dem
Applicability
nstruction nois
ble: The projecdriving activiti
ble: The projecmore than 3,50
ble: This measuy San Francisc38 (Air Pollutane).
ble: The projecand operationsubstantial em
ble: The projece BAAQMD thresholds of
The project inclin an area of p
ble: The projec0 feet in height
The project inclmolition.
se. odM
ct does not ies.
N
ct would 00 daily
NsDO
ure is co Health ant
N
ct‐related n would missions.
N
ct would N
ludes poor air
TtEHM
ct would t.
N
ludes TtsqJbt(
1144-Case N
Com
of noise attenuduring construMitigation Me
Not Applicabl
Not applicablesubject to the TDemand ManOrdinance.
Not Applicabl
Not Applicabl
Not Applicabl
The project spto implement Emissions MinHealth Risk anMitigation Me
Not Applicabl
The project spto conduct prespecial‐status qualified bioloJanuary 15 andbuilding demoto take place d(Project Mitiga
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
mpliance
uation measuruction (Projecteasure 5).
le
e, but project iTransportationagement
le
le
le
ponsor has agra Constructionimization Pland Hazards (Peasure 6).
le
ponsor has agre‐constructionbird surveys bogist between d August 15 ifolition is schedduring that peation Measure
Street 38ENV
9
res t
is n
reed n an for Project
reed n by a
f duled riod e 7).
-
Certificate
Mi
M‐BI‐1b: PStatus Bat
O. HazardMaterials
M‐HZ‐2: Materials A
M‐HZ‐3: SCorrective
PUBLIC NA “Notifioccupantsby the penvironm
Six membpublic intwould beInitial StuPaleontolosignificanthose iden
of Determinatio
itigation Meas
Pre‐ConstructiSurveys
ds and Hazard
Hazardous Abatement
Site Assessmene Action
NOTICE ANDication of Pros and ownerspublic in resmental review
bers of the puterested in hie preserved audy Checklistogical Resournt adverse enntified in the W
on
sure
ion Special‐
dous
Building
nt and
D COMMENT oject Receivin of propertiessponse to thas appropriat
ublic were intistoric resouras part of the t under Sectiorces). No othenvironmental Western SoM
A
Applicable: Tremoval of trevacant buildin
Applicable: Tdemolition of
Not Applicabby San Franci22A (Maher O
ng Environms within 300 fhe notice wete for CEQA a
terested in lerces and one project. Thes
on 1 (Land Uer comments impacts asso
Ma PEIR.
Applicability
The project invees and demolng.
The project inclf a pre‐1970s b
ble: This is supisco Health CoOrdinance).
mental Reviewfeet of the proere taken intanalysis.
earning more member of tse issues rais
Use and Landwere receiveociated with
volves lition of a
TtsqlvdM
ludes building.
TtcbsadfwapM
perseded ode Article
N
w” was maileoject site. Oveto considerat
about the prthe public intsed by the pud Use Plannined. The propothe issues id
1144-Case N
Com
The project spto conduct prespecial‐status qualified bat blarge trees arevacant buildindemolished (PMeasure 8).
The project spto ensure that containing polbiphenyls (PCsuch as fluoreare removed adisposed, andfluorescent ligwhich could care similarly rproperly dispoMitigation Me
Not Applicabl
ed on July 5erall, concerntion and inc
roject with twterested in wublic are addng) and Sectioosed project wdentified by t
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
mpliance
ponsor has agre‐constructionbat surveys bybiologist whene to be removengs are to be Project Mitigat
ponsor has agrany equipmenlychlorinated
CBs) or mercurscent light baland properly d that any ght tube fixturcontain mercurremoved intacosed of (Projeceasure 8).
le
5, 2017 to adjns and issues rcorporated in
wo members whether PDR dressed in theon 3 (Culturawould not resthe public be
Street 38ENV
10
reed n y a n ed or
tion
reed nt
ry, llasts,
es, ry, t and ct
jacent raised n the
of the space e CPE al and sult in eyond
-
Certificate
CONCLUAs summ
1. Thth
2. Thp
3. Thth
4. Thinse
5. ThP
TherePublic
7 The CPE Planning De
of Determinatio
SION arized above
he proposed he Western So
he proposed roject or the p
he proposed hat were not i
he proposed nformation thevere than we
he project spEIR to mitiga
efore, no furthc Resources C
Initial Study Chepartment, 1650 M
on
and further d
project is conoMa Commun
project wouproject site th
project woulidentified in t
project woulhat was not knere already an
ponsor will unate project‐rela
her environmCode Section 2
hecklist is availaMission Street, S
discussed in t
nsistent with tnity Plan;
uld not resultat were not id
ld not result the Western S
d not result innown at the tinalyzed and d
ndertake feasated significa
mental review21083.3 and C
able for review uite 400, San Fra
the project‐sp
the developm
t in effects ondentified as si
in potentiallSoMa PEIR;
n significant ime the Westedisclosed in th
sible mitigatioant impacts.
w shall be reqCEQA Guidel
online at http://ancisco, in Case F
pecific initial s
ment density e
n the environignificant effe
ly significant
effects, whichern SoMa PEIhe PEIR; and
on measures
quired for thelines Section 1
/sf‐planning.org/File No. 2016‐001
1144-Case N
study7:
established fo
nment that aects in the We
off‐site or cu
h, as a result IR was certifi
specified in
e proposed p15183.
/community‐plan1738ENV.
1150 Harrison No. 2016-00173
or the project s
are peculiar testern SoMa P
umulative im
of substantiaed, would be
the Western
project pursua
n‐exemptions or
Street 38ENV
11
site in
to the PEIR;
mpacts
al new e more
SoMa
ant to
r at the
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 1
EXHIBIT 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
MITIGATION MEASURES
Project Mitigation Measure 1: Protect Historical Resources from Adjacent Construction Activities (Implementing Western SoMa PEIR Mitigation Measure M-CP-7a)
The project sponsor shall consult with Planning Department environmental planning/preservation staff to determine whether adjacent or nearby buildings constitute historical resources that could be adversely affected by construction‐generated vibration. For purposes of this measure, nearby historic buildings shall include those within 100 feet of a construction site if pile driving would be used; otherwise, it shall include historic buildings within 25 feet, if heavy equipment would be used. (No measures need be applied if no heavy equipment would be employed.) If one or more historical resources is identified that could be adversely affected, the project sponsor shall incorporate into construction specifications for the proposed project a requirement that the construction contractor(s) use all feasible means to avoid damage to adjacent and nearby historic buildings. Such methods may include maintaining a safe distance between the construction site and the historic buildings (as identified by the Planning Department preservation staff),
Project sponsor and construction contractor(s) under the direction of the Environmental Review Officer (ERO).
Prior to and during demolition and construction activities.
Planning Department Preservation Technical Specialist to review monitoring reports provided by Project sponsor and/or contractor.
Considered complete upon end of construction and documentation by a qualified historic preservation profession at the direction of preservation staff that all identified protection methods were undertaken.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 2
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
using construction techniques that reduce vibration, appropriate excavation shoring methods to prevent movement of adjacent structures, and providing adequate security to minimize risks of vandalism and fire.
Project Mitigation Measure 2: Construction Monitoring Program for Historical Resources (Implementing Western SoMa PEIR Mitigation Measure M-CP-7b)
For those historical resources identified in Mitigation Measure M‐CP‐7a, and where heavy equipment would be used, the project sponsor shall undertake a monitoring program to minimize damage to adjacent historic buildings and to ensure that any such damage is documented and repaired. The monitoring program, which shall apply within 100 feet where pile driving would be used and within 25 feet otherwise, shall include the following components. Prior to the start of any ground‐disturbing activity, the project sponsor shall engage a historic architect or qualified historic preservation professional to undertake a pre‐construction survey of historical resource(s) identified by the San Francisco Planning Department within 125 feet of planned construction to document and photograph the buildings’ existing conditions. Based on the construction and condition of the resource(s), the consultant shall also establish a maximum vibration level that shall not be exceeded at each building, based on existing condition, character‐defining features, soils conditions, and anticipated construction practices (a common standard is
Project sponsor, construction contractor(s), and qualified historic preservation professional under the direction of the ERO.
Prior to and during ground‐disturbing, demolition, or construction activities.
The project sponsor and construction contractor(s) at the direction of preservation staff shall monitor vibration levels during ground‐disturbing, demolition, or construction activities and report to Planning Department Preservation Technical Specialist.
In the event that vibration levels exceed the maximum limit established by the historic preservation professional and preservation staff, construction shall be halted and alternative construction techniques shall be implemented to the extent feasible.
Considered complete upon end of construction.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 3
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
0.2 inch per second, peak particle velocity). To ensure that vibration levels do not exceed the established standard, the project sponsor shall monitor vibration levels at each structure and shall prohibit vibratory construction activities that generate vibration levels in excess of the standard.
Should vibration levels be observed in excess of the standard, construction shall be halted and alternative construction techniques put in practice, to the extent feasible. (For example, pre‐drilled piles could be substituted for driven piles, if feasible based on soils conditions; smaller, lighter equipment might be able to be used in some cases.) The consultant shall conduct regular periodic inspections of each building during ground‐disturbing activity on the project site. Should damage to either building occur, the building(s) shall be remediated to its pre‐construction condition at the conclusion of ground‐disturbing activity on the site.
Project Mitigation Measure 3: Procedures for Archeological Testing (Implementing Western SoMa PEIR Mitigation Measure M-CP-4b)
Based on a reasonable presumption that archeological resources may be present within the project site, the following measures shall be undertaken to avoid any potentially significant adverse effect from the proposed project on buried or submerged historical resources. The project sponsor shall retain the services of an archaeological
Project sponsor/ archeological consultant at the direction of the ERO.
Prior to and during soil disturbing activities
Project sponsor to retain a qualified archeological consultant who shall report to the ERO.
Qualified archeological consultant will scope archeological testing program with ERO.
Considered complete when ERO approves archeological testing plan scope.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 4
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
consultant from the rotational Department Qualified Archaeological Consultants List (QACL) maintained by the Planning Department archaeologist. The project sponsor shall contact the Department archeologist to obtain the names and contact information for the next three archeological consultants on the QACL. The archeological consultant shall undertake an archeological testing program as specified herein. In addition, the consultant shall be available to conduct an archeological monitoring and/or data recovery program if required pursuant to this measure. The archeological consultant’s work shall be conducted in accordance with this measure at the direction of the Environmental Review Officer (ERO). All plans and reports prepared by the consultant as specified herein shall be submitted first and directly to the ERO for review and comment, and shall be considered draft reports subject to revision until final approval by the ERO. Archeological monitoring and/or data recovery programs required by this measure could suspend construction of the project for up to a maximum of four weeks. At the direction of the ERO, the suspension of construction can be extended beyond four weeks only if such a suspension is the only feasible means to reduce to a less than significant level potential effects on a significant archeological resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Sect. 15064.5 (a) and (c). Consultation with Descendant Communities: On discovery of an archeological site1 associated with descendant Native
Project sponsor’s qualified
In the event that an
Consult with descendant communities to determine
Considered complete after
1 By the term “archeological site” is intended here to minimally include any archeological deposit, feature, burial, or evidence of burial.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 5
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
Americans, the Overseas Chinese, or other potentially interested descendant group an appropriate representative2 of the descendant group and the ERO shall be contacted. The representative of the descendant group shall be given the opportunity to monitor archeological field investigations of the site and to offer recommendations to the ERO regarding appropriate archeological treatment of the site, of recovered data from the site, and, if applicable, any interpretative treatment of the associated archeological site. A copy of the Final Archaeological Resources Report shall be provided to the representative of the descendant group. Archeological Testing Program. The archeological consultant shall prepare and submit to the ERO for review and approval an archeological testing plan (ATP). The archeological testing program shall be conducted in accordance with the approved ATP. The ATP shall identify the property types of the expected archeological resource(s) that potentially could be adversely affected by the proposed project, the testing method to be used, and the locations recommended for testing. The purpose of the archeological testing program will be to determine to the extent possible the presence or absence of archeological resources and to identify and to evaluate whether any archeological resource
archeological consultant Archeological consultant at the direction of the ERO.
archeological site is uncovered during the construction period Prior to soil disturbing activities.
appropriate treatment of archeological finds and report findings as appropriate Submittal of draft ATP to ERO for review and approval. Distribution of the ATP by the archeological consultant.
Archeological consultant undertake activities specified in ATP and immediately notify ERO of any encountered archeological resource.
Final Archeological Resources Report is approved and provide to descendant groups. Considered complete upon completion of the archeological testing program outlined in the ATP.
2 An “appropriate representative” of the descendant group is here defined to mean, in the case of Native Americans, any individual listed in the current Native American Contact List for the City and County of San Francisco maintained by the California Native American Heritage Commission and in the case of the Overseas Chinese, the Chinese Historical Society of America. An appropriate representative of other descendant groups should be determined in consultation with the Department archeologist.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 6
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
encountered on the site constitutes an historical resource under CEQA. At the completion of the archeological testing program, the archeological consultant shall submit a written report of the findings to the ERO. If based on the archeological testing program the archeological consultant finds that significant archeological resources may be present, the ERO in consultation with the archeological consultant shall determine if additional measures are warranted. Additional measures that may be undertaken include additional archeological testing, archeological monitoring, and/or an archeological data recovery program. No archeological data recovery shall be undertaken without the prior approval of the ERO or the Planning Department archeologist. If the ERO determines that a significant archeological resource is present and that the resource could be adversely affected by the proposed project, at the discretion of the project sponsor either:
A) The proposed project shall be re‐designed so as to avoid any adverse effect on the significant archeological resource; or
B) A data recovery program shall be implemented, unless the ERO determines that the archeological resource is of greater interpretive than research significance and that interpretive use of the resource is feasible.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 7
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
Archeological Monitoring Program. If the ERO in consultation with the archeological consultant determines that an archeological monitoring program shall be implemented the archeological monitoring program shall minimally include the following provisions:
The archeological consultant, project sponsor, and ERO shall meet and consult on the scope of the AMP reasonably prior to any project‐related soils disturbing activities commencing. The ERO in consultation with the archeological consultant shall determine what project activities shall be archeologically monitored. In most cases, any soils‐ disturbing activities, such as demolition, foundation removal, excavation, grading, utilities installation, foundation work, driving of piles (foundation, shoring, etc.), site remediation, etc., shall require archeological monitoring because of the risk these activities pose to potential archaeological resources and to their depositional context;
The archeological consultant shall advise all project contractors to be on the alert for evidence of the presence of the expected resource(s), of how to identify the evidence of the expected resource(s), and of the appropriate protocol in the event of apparent discovery of an archeological resource;
Project sponsor/ archeological consultant at the direction of the ERO.
During soils‐ disturbing activities.
Project sponsor/archeological consultant shall meet and consult with ERO on scope of AMP. Archeological consultant to monitor soils‐disturbing activities specified in AMP and immediately notify ERO of any encountered archeological resource.
Considered complete upon completion of archeological monitoring plan as outlined in the AMP.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 8
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
The archeological monitor(s) shall be present on the project site according to a schedule agreed upon by the archeological consultant and the ERO until the ERO has, in consultation with project archeological consultant, determined that project construction activities could have no effects on significant archeological deposits;
The archeological monitor shall record and be authorized to collect soil samples and artifactual/ecofactual material as warranted for analysis;
If an intact archeological deposit is encountered, all soils‐disturbing activities in the vicinity of the deposit shall cease. The archeological monitor shall be empowered to temporarily redirect demolition/excavation/pile driving/construction activities and equipment until the deposit is evaluated. The archeological consultant shall immediately notify the ERO of the encountered archeological deposit. The archeological consultant shall make a reasonable effort to assess the identity, integrity, and significance of the encountered archeological deposit, and present the findings of this assessment to the ERO.
Whether or not significant archeological resources are
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 9
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
encountered, the archeological consultant shall submit a written report of the findings of the monitoring program to the ERO. Archeological Data Recovery Program. The archeological data recovery program shall be conducted in accord with an archeological data recovery plan (ADRP). The archeological consultant, project sponsor, and ERO shall meet and consult on the scope of the ADRP prior to preparation of a draft ADRP. The archeological consultant shall submit a draft ADRP to the ERO. The ADRP shall identify how the proposed data recovery program will preserve the significant information the archeological resource is expected to contain. That is, the ADRP will identify what scientific/historical research questions are applicable to the expected resource, what data classes the resource is expected to possess, and how the expected data classes would address the applicable research questions. Data recovery, in general, should be limited to the portions of the historical property that could be adversely affected by the proposed project. Destructive data recovery methods shall not be applied to portions of the archeological resources if nondestructive methods are practical. The scope of the ADRP shall include the following elements:
Field Methods and Procedures. Descriptions of proposed field strategies, procedures, and
ERO, archeological consultant, and project sponsor
In the event that an archeological site is uncovered during the construction period
Archeological consultant to prepare an ADRP and to undertake the archeological data recovery program in consultation with ERO.
Considered complete upon completion of archeological data recovery plan as outlined in the ADRP.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 10
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
operations.
Cataloguing and Laboratory Analysis. Description of selected cataloguing system and artifact analysis procedures.
Discard and Deaccession Policy. Description of and rationale for field and post‐field discard and deaccession policies.
Interpretive Program. Consideration of an on‐site/off‐site public interpretive program during the course of the archeological data recovery program.
Security Measures. Recommended security measures to protect the archeological resource from vandalism, looting, and non‐intentionally damaging activities.
Final Report. Description of proposed report format and distribution of results.
Curation. Description of the procedures and recommendations for the curation of any recovered data having potential research value, identification of appropriate curation facilities, and a summary of the accession policies of the curation facilities.
Human Remains, Associated or Unassociated Funerary Objects. The treatment of human remains and of associated or
Archeological Consultant, ERO,
Following discovery of
Notification of ERO, Coroner and, as warranted, notification
Considered complete on
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 11
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
unassociated funerary objects discovered during any soils disturbing activity shall comply with applicable State and Federal Laws, including immediate notification of the Coroner of the City and County of San Francisco and in the event of the Coroner’s determination that the human remains are Native American remains, notification of the California State Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) who shall appoint a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) (Pub. Res. Code Sec. 5097.98). The ERO shall also be immediately notified upon discovery of human remains. The archeological consultant, project sponsor, ERO, and MLD shall have up to but not beyond six days after the discovery to make all reasonable efforts to develop an agreement for the treatment of human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects with appropriate dignity (CEQA Guidelines. Sec. 15064.5(d)). The agreement should take into consideration the appropriate excavation, removal, recordation, analysis, curation, possession, and final disposition of the human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects. Nothing in existing State regulations or in this mitigation measure compels the project sponsor and the ERO to accept recommendations of an MLD. The archeological consultant shall retain possession of any Native American human remains and associated or unassociated burial objects until completion of any scientific analyses of the human remains or objects as specified in the treatment agreement if such as agreement has been made or, otherwise, as determined by the archeological consultant and the ERO. If no agreement is reached State regulations shall be followed including the
and Coroner.
human remains.
of NAHC.
finding by ERO that all State laws regarding human remains/burial objects have been adhered to, consultation with MLD is completed as warranted, and that sufficient opportunity has been provided to the archeological consultant for scientific and historical analysis of remains and funerary objects.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 12
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
reinternment of the human remains and associated burial objects with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance (Pub. Res. Code Sec. 5097.98). Final Archeological Resources Report. The archeological consultant shall submit a Draft Final Archeological Resources Report (FARR) to the ERO that evaluates the historical significance of any discovered archeological resource and describes the archeological and historical research methods employed in the archeological testing/monitoring/data recovery program(s) undertaken. Information that may put at risk any archeological resource shall be provided in a separate removable insert within the final report. Once approved by the ERO, copies of the FARR shall be distributed as follows: California Archaeological Site Survey Northwest Information Center (NWIC) shall receive one (1) copy and the ERO shall receive a copy of the transmittal of the FARR to the NWIC. The Environmental Planning division of the Planning Department shall receive one bound, one unbound and one unlocked, searchable PDF copy on CD of the FARR along with copies of any formal site recordation forms (CA DPR 523 series) and/or documentation for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places/California Register of Historical Resources. In instances of high public interest in or the high interpretive value of the resource, the ERO may require a
Archeological consultant at the direction of the ERO. Archeological consultant at the direction of the ERO.
Following completion of cataloguing, analysis, and interpretation of recovered archeological data. Following completion of FARR and review and approval by ERO.
Archeological consultant to prepare FARR. Following approval from the ERO, archeological consultant to distribute FARR.
Considered complete upon review and approval of FARR by ERO. Considered complete upon certification to ERO that copies of FARR have been distributed.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 13
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
different final report content, format, and distribution than that presented above.
Project Mitigation Measure 4 – Siting of Noise –Generating Uses (Implementing Western SoMa PEIR Mitigation Measure M-NO-1c)
To ensure that project noise from the mechanical equipment meets the Police Code section 2909 noise requirement, the project sponsor shall undertake the following:
• For heat pumps and supply fans, the project sponsor shall construct an acoustical barrier/roof parapet along the east edge of the project building that is a minimum of two feet taller than the top of the tallest rooftop mechanical equipment; and
• For all other rooftop mechanical equipment such as exhaust fans, future tenant equipment, air handling units, or similar equipment, the project sponsor shall incorporate a combination of noise attenuation measures into stationary equipment installed on the project building. Noise attenuation measures can include providing sound enclosures, increasing setback distances from the property plane, providing louvered vent openings, and locating vent openings away from the property plan. The final rooftop mechanical equipment configuration shall demonstrate that noise levels along the property plan to the east are reduced to 58 dBA and
Project sponsor, architect, acoustical consultant, and construction contractor. Project designer to incorporate mechanical equipment specifications and documentation into construction plans demonstrating compliance with Police Code section 2909 noise requirements.
Prior to issuance of architectural addendum and at final building inspection.
Planning Department and Department of Building Inspection to review and approve plans demonstrating compliance with Police Code section 2909.
Considered complete upon approval of final construction plan set and final building inspection.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 14
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
noise levels along the property plane to the north are reduced to 62 dBA.
Project Mitigation Measure 5: General Construction Noise Control Measures (Implementing Western SoMa PEIR Mitigation Measure M-NO-2a)
To ensure that project noise from construction activities is minimized to the maximum extent feasible, the project sponsor shall undertake the following:
• The project sponsor shall conduct noise monitoring at the beginning of major construction phases (e.g., demolition, excavation) to determine the need and the effectiveness of noise‐attenuation measures.
• The project sponsor shall require the general contractor to ensure that equipment and trucks used for project construction use the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment redesign, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds, wherever feasible).
• The project sponsor shall require the general contractor to avoid placing stationary noise sources (such as generators and compressors) within noise‐sensitive buffer areas (measured at linear 20 feet) between immediately adjacent
Project sponsor and construction contractor(s).
Prior to and during demolition or construction activities.
The project sponsor and construction contractor(s) shall submit a noise attenuation plan to the Department of Building Inspection and monthly reports to the Planning Department.
Considered complete upon final monthly report.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 15
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
neighbors. The project sponsor shall construct barriers around such sources and/or the construction site, which could reduce construction noise by as much as 5 dBA. To further reduce noise, the contractor shall locate stationary equipment in pit areas or excavated areas, if feasible.
• The project sponsor shall require the general contractor to use impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) that are hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. Where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used, along with external noise jackets on the tools, which could reduce noise levels by as much as 10 dBA.
• The project sponsor shall require that all construction equipment be in good working order and that mufflers are inspected and determined to be functioning properly. The project sponsor shall require that all construction equipment and engines be operated so as to avoid unnecessary idling.
• The project sponsor shall include noise control requirements in specifications provided to
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 16
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
construction contractors. Such requirements could include, but not be limited to: performing all work in a manner that minimizes noise to the extent feasible; undertaking the most noisy activities during times of least disturbance to surrounding residents and occupants, as feasible; and selecting haul routes that avoid residential buildings inasmuch as such routes are otherwise feasible.
• Prior to the issuance of each building permit, along with the submission of construction documents, the sponsor shall submit to the San Francisco Planning Department and Department of Building Inspection (DBI) a list of measures to respond to and track complaints pertaining to construction noise. These measures shall include: (1) a procedure and phone numbers for notifying DBI, the Department of Public Health, and the Police Department (during regular construction hours and off‐hours); (2) a sign posted on‐site describing noise complaint procedures and a complaint hotline number that shall be answered at all times during construction; (3) designation of an on‐site construction complaint and enforcement manager for the project; and (4) notification of neighboring residents and non‐residential building managers within 300 feet of the project construction area at least 30 days in advance of extreme noise‐generating activities
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 17
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
(defined as activities generating noise levels of 90 dBA or greater at 50 feet) about the estimated duration of the activity.
Project Mitigation Measure 6: Construction Emissions Minimization Plan for Health Risks and Hazards (Implementing Western SoMa PEIR Mitigation Measure M-AQ-7)
The project sponsor or the project sponsor’s Contractor shall comply with the following:
A. Engine Requirements.
1. All off‐road equipment greater than 25 hp and operating for more than 20 total hours over the entire duration of construction activities shall have engines that meet or exceed either U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or California Air Resources Board (ARB) Tier 2 off‐road emission standards, and have been retrofitted with an ARB Level 3 Verified Diesel Emissions Control Strategy. Equipment with engines meeting Tier 4 Interim or Tier 4 Final off‐road emission standards automatically meet this requirement.
2. Where access to alternative sources of power are available, portable diesel engines shall be prohibited.
Project sponsor, contractor(s).
Submit certification statement prior to construction activities requiring the use of off‐road equipment.
Project sponsor, contractor(s) to submit certification statement to the ERO.
Considered complete upon submittal of certification statement.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 18
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
3. Diesel engines, whether for off‐road or on‐road equipment, shall not be left idling for more than two minutes, at any location, except as provided in exceptions to the applicable state regulations regarding idling for off‐road and on‐road equipment (e.g., traffic conditions, safe operating conditions). The Contractor shall post legible and visible signs in English, Spanish, and Chinese, in designated queuing areas and at the construction site to remind operators of the two‐minute idling limit.
4. The Contractor shall instruct construction workers and equipment operators on the maintenance and tuning of construction equipment, and require that such workers and operators properly maintain and tune equipment in accordance with manufacturer specifications.
B. Waivers.
1. The Planning Department’s Environmental Review Officer (ERO) or designee may waive the alternative source of power requirement of Subsection (A)(2) if an alternative source of power is limited or infeasible at the project site. If the ERO grants the waiver, the Contractor must submit documentation that
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 19
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
the equipment used for on‐site power generation meets the requirements of Subsection (A)(1).
2. The ERO may waive the equipment requirements of Subsection (A)(1) if: a particular piece of off‐road equipment with an ARB Level 3 VDECS is technically not feasible; the equipment would not produce desired emissions reduction due to expected operating modes; installation of the equipment would create a safety hazard or impaired visibility for the operator; or, there is a compelling emergency need to use off‐road equipment that is not retrofitted with an ARB Level 3 VDECS. If the ERO grants the waiver, the Contractor must use the next cleanest piece of off‐road equipment, according to the table below.
Table – Off-Road Equipment Compliance Step-down Schedule
Engine Emission Standard Emissions Control
Tier 2 ARB Level 2 VDECS
Tier 2 ARB Level 1 VDECS
Tier 2 Alternative Fuel*
How to use the table: If the ERO determines that the equipment requirements cannot be met, then the project sponsor would need to meet Compliance Alternative 1. If the ERO determines that the Contractor cannot supply off‐road equipment meeting Compliance Alternative 1, then the Contractor must meet Compliance Alternative 2.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 20
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
If the ERO determines that the Contractor cannot supply off‐road equipment meeting Compliance Alternative 2, then the Contractor must meet Compliance Alternative 3. Alternative fuels are not a VDECS.
C. Construction Emissions Minimization Plan. Before starting on‐site construction activities, the Contractor shall submit a Construction Emissions Minimization Plan (Plan) to the ERO for review and approval. The Plan shall state, in reasonable detail, how the Contractor will meet the requirements of Section A.
1. The Plan shall include estimates of the construction timeline by phase, with a description of each piece of off‐road equipment required for every construction phase. The description may include, but is not limited to: equipment type, equipment manufacturer, equipment identification number, engine model year, engine certification (Tier rating), horsepower, engine serial number, and expected fuel usage and hours of operation. For VDECS installed, the description may include: technology type, serial number, make, model, manufacturer, ARB verification number level, and installation date and hour meter reading on installation date. For off‐road equipment using alternative
Project sponsor, contractor(s).
Prepare and submit a Plan prior to issuance of a permit specified in Section 106A.3.2.6 of the San Francisco Building Code.
Project sponsor, contractor(s) and the ERO.
Considered complete upon findings by the ERO that the Plan is complete.
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 21
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Mitigation/Improvement Measures
Responsibility for
Implementation
Mitigation Action and Schedule
Monitoring and Reporting Responsibility
Status / Date Completed
fuels, the description shall also specify the type of alternative fuel being used.
2. The ERO shall ensure that all applicable requirements of the Plan have been incorporated into the contract specifications. The Plan shall include a certification statement that the Contractor agrees to comply fully with the Plan.
3. The Contractor shall make the Plan available to the public for review on‐site during working hours. The Contractor shall post at the construction site a legible and visible sign summarizing the Plan. The sign shall also state that the public may ask to inspect the Plan for the project at any time during working hours and shall explain how to request to inspect the Plan. The Contractor shall post at least one copy of the sign in a visible location on each side of the construction site facing a public right‐of‐way.
D. Monitoring. After start of construction activities, the Contractor shall submit quarterly reports to the ERO documenting compliance with the Plan. After completion of construction activities and prior to receiving a final certificate of occupancy, the project sponsor shall submit to the ERO a final report
Project sponsor, contractor(s).
Submit quarterly reports.
Project sponsor, contractor(s) and the ERO.
Considered complete upon findings by the ERO that the Plan is being/has been
-
1 1 4 4 - 1 1 5 0 H A R R I S O N S T R E E T C A S E N O . 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 1 7 3 8 E N V M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M A P R I L 2 0 1 8 22
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Adopted Miti