8tati~ticul ,and - The Sacred Science1. A 20 year record of high level correlation between ......

1'01 R. Oaniela FrOllll M. B. n,ulbrouck :}ubjeot: Breaktbrough?

Relayed to me yutera>\y, not cO!1f'identIe.llYt specifically for transmission to yOU it: our intereat I The news that th18 lAf't week t ,To::n Nelson was otf'lcially visitedb,. three .cientists trom the ,'ri;;cetou:::c-nter of H.:.A. snd informed t:-.'1t tt,ey flnd hi. work in forecast in" radio disturb')Dce. "superb."

This ill vItally imp"rtsnt to ust this tll1le. It1el.lnS that Uhe prejudice Against utilizing planet:.,r,y correlations has been cracked wide open at top levels both i" soieace and iniustry. The breakthrough bas been aocomplished by the very ~Jlet:'tOds employed by (,EOV,AGr:;;:TICS I statistIcal evide,~ce over a period ot ti"!e. But tor us the i:mnediate impl1c:.t;ion goes tar beyonj stati9tics. • confirms the scienti!1o vaUt1ity of tLe o8s1c ooncept we present in support of our own 8tati~ticul record -- the ooncept that a natural COfr.lst8lP exlsts between toe changing patt.rns formed by the :nov og bo .... of the solar syste!] and chan~es ln the various ,ll'lgoetio ,and ot' er) flelds knownto ·~nd.rn sclenc ••

Our flrst foreoants were found accurate by C. N. And.rli!on of Bell Tele;:.llone I.aboratorics in 1:)41, and by 111'. B. T. Stetson 1n 1~-4}t several years before ';elson atarted hie research. '~e 1Iet Nelson in 1950 t tLrou,"Ji Arthur Van Dyke t then ae!li~tant to a Vic. PresUent of R.C.A. 1:e IlV, ;(ept 1n touoh t informally but frequently, w1toh Nelsoo ever slnce. \)ur work, io the minds of ,nan,. people t 18 aasoclatej with his t but On17{ In'o far aa the solar system is involved in both!lethol1e. Nell'lol't fl err:rts apply exclu.;lvely to torec!lstll1~ rslio dl\\l!;urbance O'er1') 19. The SP:Yt,\;' '~IC f()recasts cover a 71Uer riel·1 of corr, .. iated liatur-banc. p:,eno!llena - lllltjor e'JrtLqullkes. voiosd.c eruptions, tlL11,l1 ~"'" wave., an:! (whenever we could c,eck 'Jith off'tcial,1ata) solar !In:l " geo:nagoetio storll. a. pl.eoolllena 1n thellls.lves. RecentlYt our corr.h"t1"ns have included l;. S. 'Il1asile hunCl 'b~str(}m their beguv;iag to t.ee sui of' 1:*>0, ci,ecke:\ ~1th ofHdfl1 records.

,>1ncerc 1,7,

e.c. - ~c:-( • B. H!!sbrcuck

;) re~!t;)r of a.,se ,reb

Institute of CosmoEconomics

www.CosmoEconomics.com



I .

Geomagnetics Research, Inc. 319 EAST 50th STREET

t-:.t.w YORK 22, N. Y.

PlAZA 8.1993

PROSPECTUS

August 4, 1963

GEOMAGNETICS RESEARCH, incorporated in 1961, has discovered and developed a measurable correlation between mathematical astronomy and field physics. From this synthesis has evolved a space-time frame of reference from which it is possible to evaluate space weather conditions through the timing of solar flares, geomagnetic storms, ana other field-force phenomena known to be the source of interference in electronic communications, and to constitute a hazard in space flight operations.

Recent astrophysical research has given evidence that space weather conditions -- disturbed or clear -- are directly linked with solar variation and activity. The GMR space-time structure, through the accurate timing of solar flares and related fieldforce perturbations, provides a reliable method for space weather forecasting -- short and long range -- that is vitally needed, and currently lacking, in space science and engineering.

The GMR technique has been successfully applied over the past twenty years to a variety of test projects, from the first predictions in 1942 (radio interference

. and sunspot variation) to the present high level correlation of solar flares and geomagnetic storms -- and missile launching failures -- with COincidentally timed forecasts.





--_._--------_._-----------

GMR Prospectus Page 2

POTENTIAL APPLICATION AND USE OF GEOMAG~~TICS RESEARCH DATA

1. National Defense and Space Agencies

While a primary purpose of Geomagnetics Research is to develop over a broad area the synthesis between field physics and mathematical astronomy, the immediate usefulness of GMR data is in the area of practical prediction.

The number of active centers responsible for efficiency and safety in space flight continues to increase with the expansion of planning for space projects such as APOLLO and GEMINI, and preparatory space launchings. Almost without exception, these research and flight centers -- from the east to the west coast -- are searching unsuccessfully for methods of solar flare and geomagnetic storm prediction.

Because GMR has discovered, developed, and demonstrated a predictive technique with special application to solar flares and geomagnetic storms, the potential usefulness and value of m~ timing and evaluation data should greatly assist all national defense and space agencies --.NASA, USAF, U.S. Army and Navy installations, and the many related centers of scientific and engineering activity throughout the country concerned with space operational activity.

2. Industrial Research and Operation

One of the major problems in the electronics industry is radio frequency interference, known.as RFl, which arises from "man-made" and/or "natural" sources -- viz: from operational incompatibility (man-made) and from solar and geomagnetic field-force disturbance (natural.)

As no technical method has been evolved for predicting periods of field-disturbance, the GMR technique, covering solar and geomagnetic storms, radio bursts, and sunspot variations, can be a valuable aid to electronics in dealing with "natural" RFI.

3. Meteorological Centers

Weather turbulence and climatic change are believed to be.related to solar flare activity, but the relationship so far has not been included in conventional weather prediction.

The GMR record of solar flare prediction suggests that a correlation of the GMR technique with established weather systems would add considerably to forecasting scope and efficiency.





GMR Prospectus

(Application)

Page ~

Further areas of GMR development are now ready for use:

1. A 20 year record of high level correlation between GMR forecasts of field-force disturbance and occurrence of high magnitude earthquakes.

2. Biological effects of field-force are under world-wide study by the medical profession, both civil and military. Here it is thought that the GMR system of timing fieldforce disturbance periods might make a vital contribution to medical research, and to the "Life Sciences" which are being intensively developed by aerospace science relative to manned space flight.

HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION

Approximately thirty years ago, research by an economist and a writer -- Louis and M. B. Hasbrouck -- led to the discovery of the GMR space-time structure and technique. Since then, they have refined and developed both structure and timing techniques, while exploring a number of fields of useful application. In 1961 Geomagnetics Research was incorporated under the laws of the State of New York with an authorized capital of $100,000 consisting of 1,000 shares of $100 par, of which to date 305 shares have been issued. The Hasbroucks turned over to the corporation a complete description of their discovery and timing methods in exchange for 250 shares of stock.

The present officers, comprising the board of directors are:

President Louis Hasbrouck Exec. Vice President . D. C • . ~wnley Vice President (Research)M. B. Hasbrouck Secretary-Treasurer E. W. Hermann

Personnel has intentionally been kept small, but can be quickly augmented when required. Because the GMR technique of astrophysical synthesis is a new discovery in SCience, and by its nature is a part of natural law, it is non-patentable • . Consequently care must be exercised to protect the method in order best to utilize the discovery.

All GMR forecasts are closely checked for correlation with data from official sources: the Federal Bureau of Standards and the High Altitude Observatory for solar. flares and geomagnetic storms; the Coast and Geodetic Survey for earthquakes; the National Aeronautic and Space Administration for missile and satellite data.





.... _--------------

GMR Prospectus

(Organization)

Page · 4

Preparation and distribution of space weather forecasts are conducted from the present office in New York on a fee or contract basis. Fundamental forecasts, covering any desired period, can be further analyzed as to their special application to the needs of a particular area of use: viz: for electronics, RFI; for space operational planning, selective timing for tests, launchings, or flights; for weather forecasting, advanoe timing of storm centers. In short, to the know-how of space technology GMRis able to add the vital factor of knowing-when -- and of judging in advance wpat conditions may be expected in the danger areas of outer space'~

SUMMARY

The radiation hazard of solar flares in space flight -particularly in manned space flight -- has been described as "the hostility of space." Professor J. A. Simpson adds, in Science i!! Space, p. 225: "The inner solar system has become one vast laboratory for the investigation of dilute plasmas, magnetic fields, hydromagnetic waves, and shock phenomena that cannot be scaled down properly for laboratory study."

Whiae much has been learned in exploring this "vast laboratory" little or nothing has been added toward anticipating the outbreak of solar storms. Even the mass of data recovered from satellites and probes has failed to reveal a method for solar flare prediction.

The success 2! ~eom~gnetics Research !a !h!! regard

woulg iiim 12 ipg~9.ti ~ ~ miiling 'l'mept 18 spaoe science has ~ mathematical astronomy, !B !!! natural function !! ! coordinate space-time frame of reference.

1964 has been deSignated as "Year of the Quiet Sun" -that is, it marks the low point in the approximate 11 year cycle of solar flares and sunspot activity.

The record shows that since the last high point in the solar cycle -- 1957-58 -- space operational successes have out~umbered failures in a yearly increasing ratio, even as the solar storms have been decreasing year by year in number and intensity. .

When the solar cycle passes its low point and starts up again toward a peak of activity, the need for an organized system of solar flare prediction and evaluation will be so great that it can hardly be overestimated. The major space projects are being planned for operation in the years that follow the "Year of the Quiet Sun." . . ,.. . . ,.. . . . .

,.. . . ,.. .. . . . ,.. ,.. ,.. . . .

,.. . . . • ••

r ! !





HOW -- AND WHY -- THE RESEARCH BEGAN

This research in space-time astrophysics, now incorporated in GMR, had its beginning in 1930 when two people -- a writer and an economist -- came together on the crest of a wave of frustration as to what makes the wheels of the world go round.

What is it (asked the economist) that sends stock market prices up~ as in 1926-29, and down as in 1929-32? Why this perennial ebb and flow of prosperity to poverty and back?

What is it (asked the writer) that lies behind the changing waves of human motivation and desire, the molecular substance of literature and life itself?

Fully aware that many had gone this way before, only to return empty-handed, these two decided to try it on their own. They began by pooling such knowledge as both had garnered from education and experience. This included engineering, economics, and ten years in Wall Street, along with music, comparative philosophy, and ten years in journalism. At first, this appeared to be an irreducible mixture. One day, the concept cleared, to reveal a lucid hypothesis. Incorporating the older, indispensible factors of mathematical astronomy with the continuum of modern field physics had produced the GMR premise of a unified space-time astrophysics.

The first empirical evidence of its validity was demonstrated in an annual cyclic wave-structure, reflected in fluctuating human moods and motivations as the background of current trends (later developed into the space-time structure of history.) This discovery synchronized -- and concretized -- the Hurr-Northrop research at Yale, which proved that changing magnetic field-forces affect all living things and beings.

The first astrophysical evidence came from radio interference (RFI.) From there the scope of the GMR premise and technique has expanded -- on the principle of the cognate hypotheSiS, where one set of evidence leads logically to another -- from radio in 1941 through four intervening areas to aerospace operational failures in 1957.

The most recent correlation to be established by GMR is in the occurrence of solar flares. While no method of flare prediction has yet been found through probes and satellites·· GMR space disturbance forecasts have coincided with solar flares from their first recorded observations until now •

•• "Already, space officials are fretting about the possibility of giant solar flares occurring while astronauts are on their way to the moon. • • Such flares hurl out lethal quantities of radiation that could endanger the lives of space travellers."

(Wall Street Journal, August 19/63)





1 ! BRLo;F OUTLINE OF TliS BROAD, BUT UNIFIED SCOPE OF


NEW YORK 22. N. Y.

PlAZA 8.1998

Scientifically, we have re-forged the natural link o~oken by Aristotle -- between astronomy and physics. ':Ie have done this through the astronomical timing of field-force disturbances -- solar flares, geomagnetic storms, etc. -- thereby estab~ishing an interplanetary space-time structure that is mathematically reliable.

Humanistically, we have demonstrated that man is not

June,1363

a mechCln ... stic fragment in an incomprehensibJ:e universe, but an integral part of an orderly, evolutionary -- and revolutionary -- world system that can be followed with undersGanding and intelligent adaptability.

Historically, we have timed and evaluated -- in terms of human motivation, response, and the resultant upward and downward waves in advancing civilization -- the cyclic turn-ing points in history as they form, and follow, an everchanging s8quence and recurrence in the space-time structure, or continuum.

Philosophically, we have built the foundation for a new &oproach -- unattainable prior to the advent of nuclear and :eneral space science -- to the problem of faith, belief, and

confidence in the existence of a universal order that functions throughout what we know as observable phenomena and what we hope for as an image of reality, or truth. ---

ThiS, in a few words, is the fourfold basis of our research and development.

At the practical level -- available for immediate use --is the techniqu~ of predictability that has been applied with consistent reliability, for several years, to the field-force distQrbances affecting space flight, and electronically-controlled operations in general. This applies particularly, at the moment, to the solar storms which constitute a radiation hazard in manned space flight, and which are found to correspond conSistently over the years where records are available -- to certain GMR time warnings.

This coordinated discovery and development of what appears to be a unifying prinCiple, capable of constructive application in several separate, but related areas of modern life -- from space flight to the printed page -- would seem to justify the financial, organizational support without which no discovery or endeavor can be integrated, presented, and put to use.

r:\. B. Hasbrouck Director of Research





GMR NEWS LETTER # 4

Geomagnetics Research, Inc. ll9 EAST 50th STREET

NEW YORK 22, N. Y.

PlA .. 8.1998

World and Economic Trends

November 28,1963

Surely no stronger evidence could be adduced as to the validity of the space-time cyclic sequence relative to economic trends than from the world-wide response to the assassination of President Kennedy on Friday, November 22. An act of such untterable evil is commonly expected to spawn results of national and international fear, suspicion, and upheaval -- toppling thrones, crashing stock markets, riots and mass violence -- such as have followed similar tragedies within (for some of us) living memory.

But on this unforgettable occasion it was at once clear that no cataclysmic repercussions were developing. Friends and foes alike from every part of the world (with two notable exceptions, Reg China and Red Cuba) gathered automatically, as if by magic, in a friendly, sorrowing group, unified as they could not have been by any other means imaginable today. The major world markets, after brief shock selling, quickly balanced out. The trend of world-wide confidence -- now heading toward its natural peak -- was barely interrupted. That this would be the case was indicated by the current dynamics of the space-time cyclic structure. The teleological image of the next few years, and beyond, stands unchanged by one of the greatest tragedies, to date, in American political history.

Solar and Geomagnetic Storms -. Correlation of GMR forecasts with observed disturbance phenomena (and quiet periods) continues at a high synchronistic level. The New York Times (Nov.26/63; p. 42) headlined the "important discovery" on October 13 last of a scientist working in Antarctica. He found evidence of coincidence between what is known as a radio "whistler" and Navy radio reception interference. These odd"noises are one of the many remaining mysteries of space, and heretofore have not been considered as interference factors, the report said.

'OJ •

Reference to the GMR correlation record for October shows, on the 13th, a storm forecast of d intenSity (disturbed) preceded by an r si7nal on the 12th (sudden disturbance) and followed by a d+

J •

on the 14th (severe disturbance.) Such a series frequently C01n-cides with both solar and seismic phenomena. In this case, the reported results show major radio bursts and solar flares of 1+ importance on the 13th and 14th, earthquakes of 7 and ~ magnitude on the 12th and 13th. Clearly, a storm of considerable intensity occurred, detected after the event by tuning in a "whistler" but clearly forecast by GMR weeks ahead of its probable impact.

L. Hasbrouck President

M. B. Hasbrouck Director of Research





ME' ORANDUM

To: R. Daniels

From : Muriel Hasbrouck

Subject : The basis and method of a d iscovery for ti~ng in advance certain field phenomena called "magnetic storms" which , from twenty years cumulative evidence, are found Xm a) to affedt rad io propogation and electrical nower equipment, and (b) to ~oincide with the occurrence of solar flares , auroras , sunspots, earthquakes of magnitude 6 or over, vo canic eruptions, and missile launching failures.

BASIS

1. That the solar system is not , as generally considered , a group of separate planeta~y bodies in orbit round the Gun, but that it is a un i fi ed working system with inter-related parts -- defined bv modern physics as charged bodies with fields about t hem -- whose constant orbital motion is-reIated to field-force changes within the system, directly observable within t he field of t he earth , and from the earth as tbe only

available vanta~e pOint.

2. That within the field of the earth there exists a cyclic nattern of changin~ field- force , meae~ab~-aceording to the ~6Q degrees of the astrono.liical solar year , whose regular currents are deflected, or distorted , by the variable orbits of the pl anetary bodies . Field force disturbances, as evidenced in corresponding earth 1iRimK phenomena , are found to coincide with these distortions in the field , whic h are predictable in terms of solar syste~ harmonics .

NOTE : The above factor (2) di f ferentiates the J asbrouck fore casts from other attempts to correlate planetary cycles, in t hemselves , with earth field oheno'nena . 60me few of tbese efforts have been notably successful in predict i ng radio disturbance periods through planetary relationships alone , but the further developments to other areas -- eartbquakes , eruptions, missile 1 uDchin~ failures -- has grown out of the linkage of the concept ..... ith ~ ttftified field tl'QQry ef ohysics , " .. ( :c; 'hl

~ ~ c- "" <-, "t~ ..c:.-..... _ ~t:; .





RD Notes 2

Here are some quotes from THE EVOLUTION OF P YSICS to back this up:

p. 151 "lilaxwell ) "The electJic and magnetic field, or in short the electromagnetic field is, in Maxwell's theory , something real. Th e electric field is produced by a chang i ng magnetic field , quite quite independently ••• a magnet ic field is produced by a changin electric fie l d ••• The electromagnetic f i e ld once created exists , acts , and changes acc or ding to Maxwell' s laws ••• All space is the scene of t hese laws ."

p . 157 "In the new field langu age it is t he de s cription of the field between the charges, and not the c harges t hemselves, whi ch is essential for an und erstanding of their action . "

p . 162 "All our experiments mus t be perf ormed on earth; e pre ssed scientifically , the earth is our co-ord i nate system . "

cV p . 163 ~ "We must have wbat we call s ome frame of reference, a ~ mechanical s caffold , to be able to dete r mine the pOSitions of bodies

••• it become t oe co-ordi nate system . (Our CS is the tbe Solar Svstem ; it is also our f ralle of reference ••• i n which (as said on p.165 ' the bodies move uniform(lf relat ive to it." And he goes on: "If we have t wo CS moving non- uniormly, relative to e a c h other, t hen the laws of nechanics cannot be valid in both. "Good" co-ordinate systems, t nat is~ those for which the laws of mec hanics are valid , we call ±mXmxaxatmK~xmxmxmxmx inertial s ystems.

~_ The question as to whether an inertial syst;em exists at all i s still unsetlled . But i f there is 0 1 e such system , then t here is an -infinite numb er of t hem. Ev ery CS moving uniformly, r elative to the ini t ial one , is also an inertia l OS .

I t seems to me t is app,ies perfect l y to our conce pt ion of the bolar vystem as t he frame of reference , the fourfold force patcern a s the i ertial system , a nd the 3un, eart ' , and planets as OS moving uni formly relative to the sun as the centra l CS ••• /

p . 171 "uur conclusions a r e g enerallv valid , and can be sumnarized as 'ollow", :

1. " e k'1OW of no rule for finding an in~ertial system. Given one, ~owever , we can find an infinite number, s ince all CS moving uniformly , r e lative to each other, are inertial systems if one of them is .

2 . The time corr e sponding to a n ev ent i s the same in all CS . But t ~le co-or linate s and veloc ities are different, and c hangex according to the trahsformation l aws.. He ~oes on to say, on page 186 , t hat the classical transformation laws d on t wor k any ~ore, the laws of relativ ity are the Lorenz transformation laws •••

lell, our woole conc e pt ml wbat goes on i n the field is a series of trans~formations -- change of 'osition , of ge ometry, pattern, all relative to each ot he r and to t he whole ••

p. 186 "All laws of nature are t he same in a ll CS movin~ uniformly relative to each other" • • •





• /

,~\

l12kt{erence Consultants, Inc.

150 Causeway Street

Boston 14, Massachusetts

Mrs. Muriel Hasbrouck 319 East 50th Street New York New York 10022

Dear Mrs. Hasbrouck:

March 3, 1964

I am very glad to give a brief summary of my relationship with you and with Geomagnetics Research, Inc. , in your attempts to present your work in a form which would be acceptable to modern science.

As consultant to several departments of the government in the field of electromagnetic compatibility. I am retained to investigate any and all disciplines which might have an effect on the malfunctioning of our space and weapon systems. In such capacity I am to take the position of amicus curi and not establish any conflict of interest by acquiring a permanent interest in any capability under investigation. This is my present position in regard to your work.

As far back as 1955, it was apparent that magnetic storms might have a deleterious effect on weapon system controls and that the charac· teristics and timing of these storms would have to be better understood. One of the aspects of this understanding would be to determine whether the time and duration of such storms could be forecast with any accuracy. A general beginning was made, in a study of this subject, by accumulating existing information on all methods of forecasting of "weather" phenomena; such as employed by Ricard of Santa Clara University, Tomaschek of Munich University, Nelson of RCA, The Farmer's Almanac, and others. Your method of forecasting earthquakes was called to my attention in the summer of 1960 and, in the beginning of 1961, I began to interview you.

~,', :

After studying your work, for several months, I stated to you that I did not see where your earthquake data would generate any immediate ac· ceptance and suggested that you attempt to correlate missile failures with





, INTERFERENCE CONSULTANTS, loc.

150 Causeway Street

Boston 14, M ....

Mrs. Muriel Hasbrouck - 2 - March 3, 1964

magnetic storm activity. This you did and presented such accurate correlations that several representatives of the government and its contractors contacted you for further details. Although your correlations were considered accurate, it was impos sible, because of military classification and lack of information as to the actual causes of malfunctioning, to justify the funding of a research contract. To link the two together, I then suggested that a forecasting of "clear" days might justify some government funding. This, I understand, is presently under consideration but is meeting with the opposition of government physicists although lower echelons wish to proceed. As a result, I have had to become inactive in your behalf until such time as government interest warranted further investigation.

As I believe I have pointed out to you, several times, your ability to forecast natural phenomena is not unique as there have been in the past and are, at present, responsible people who are making practical applications every day in connection with their own work. Unfortunately, those of us who have become interested in your basic concepts have had to try and hurdle a scientific gap which is proving almost impossible under the present state of the art.

There seem to be two current procedures to follow; one is to continue accumulating correlations and interpretations until the state of the art catches up or, two; to try and bridge this gap by employing the services of qualified scientists who can translate your findings into the language which science will accept. As far as I am personally concerned, I have seen enough evidence of the practical results of your work and others, including the Russians, to believe that you can eventually make a very important recognized contribution to science. I hope the Russians do not get ahead of you. So keep trying, as I personally believe you have something of inestimable value to our national defense and to our space projects.

Very truly yours,

RD/d

J;;~~~~ Rexf~~ Daniels

cc: D. C. Townley





1," ,4 · , ' .+' !:?"" jj# , ( .

: .~.

Louis Hasbrouck M. 8. Hasbrouck

~~. Seymour Tilson Associate Editor


NEW YORK, N. Y. 10022

PLaza 8·1998

International Science and Technology 205 East 42nd Street, New York, ~.Y. 10017

Dear Seymour:

July 28, 1965

As we recalled over the telephone, yesterday, you have been good enough to comment favorably, in the past, on what you've heard of the discoveries and developments in this workshop. But until now,'we have heard no ringing bell, no siren whistle, to announce that the time had come for serious investigation of our work. The time has come; here is the reason why:

It is reported in SCIENCE for June, 1965 (p. 1592) by Norman F •. Ness of Goddard Space Flight Center and John M. Wilcox, Space Science Laboratory, University of California, that "Observations of the interplanetary field by the IMP #1 have revealed a regular longitudinal sector structure in this field."

Science writer George Getze, in the Los Angeles Times of June 21, 1965, interprets the findings of the two scientists. "Their findings confirm the existence of a great spiral structure in the interplanetary magnetic field that extends out from the sun and which turns in tune with the sun's period of rotation. Like a gigantic lawn sprinkler sending streams of water spiralling over the ground, the sun's rotation sends waves of magnetism sweeping re gularly past the earth. This data has shown the existence of four distinct spirals in the magnetic field. (Emphasis mine.) Recurring patterns of intensity have been detected in each spiral, and the spirals alternate in the direction of the magnetic force. As each spiral sweeps past the earth it seems to influence the activity within the earth's magnetic field, and also appears to affect the intensity of the cosmic ray bombardment of the earth. The four spiralling sectors are not equal in size, according to the scientists."

On August 6, 1964, we wrote you: "You've had considerable briefing on our work, but to recapitulate briefly: Twenty years before the Van Allen Belts and Solar Winds were located by the Explorers and Sputniks, we had worked out, and demonstrated, the existence of four forces constantly flowing and interacting through the interplanetary field."





S.T. 2

These four I1forces" have turned out to be the basis of a timing system through which (as you know) we are able to forecast the occurrence of field-force disturbance phenomena, from simple radio frequency interference (in 1941) to geomagnetrc storms, solar flares, and radio bursts (since 1957.) Extensions of the four-way system have been applied (successfully) to the analysis and anticipation of changing trends in economic and world conditions. (See enclosed Interim Letters from our economic sector.) And there are clear indications, not yet fully developed, that the system is also appli-cable in the medical area known as bionics. ~ ~

Apparently we have come upon a coordinated field structure in space-time dynamics within the solar system. The variations in the dynamic force-field patterns are measurable according to the principles of mathematical astronomy, via the Nautical Almanac. NOT astrology, once and for alll In our search for causality in space-time, it was advisable that we investigate, test -- and discard --. every known astrological theory. We can therefore state categorically that nowhere in that confused mass of half-knowledge is there a clue to the existence of the four basic space-time f~rces as we have defined, analyzed, and demonstrated their existence.

The pOint of the matter is that the GMR system of space-time dynamics works. It has worked from the day it was first applied to radio interference periods in 1941 (with C. N. Anderson of the Bell Telephone Laboratories) to the fore~asts made in 1964 at the request of Dr. John Firor, Director of the High Altitude Observatory in Colorado, in which the correlating phenomena, taken from HAC and Geodetic Survey observations, included solar flares, radio bursts, geomagnetic storms, and major earthquakes. (See Hecord enclosed.)

The fact that Dr. Firor refuses to recognize the evidence of the GMR forecasts as worthy of investigation is beside the point. From the beginning, we have been subject to skepticism from people in his world. A four-way field-force pattern, we were told, was beyond all scientific reason; the accuracy of our forecasts (over 20 years) was due to "chance." But the evidence continued to pile up. Van Allen Belts and Solar Winds -- surprising the IGY people -came along to support our general thesis of a unified space-time dynamics in the interplanetary field. ~ut there has been no physical sign of the four forces until now, thanks to IMP, whose magical mechanics seem to have integrated our cognate hypothesis.

Here are a few of the many striking points of resemblance between the .solar sector structure as defined by Wilcox and Ness in SCIENCE and the four-way patterns of space-time dynamics as we have developed, applied, and tried to understand them.

1. The primary link between the two discoveries is the fact that both deal with no more, and no less, than FOUR forces. The scientists define these forces as a sweeping four-arm spiral with the sun as its center, moving "in the plane of the ecliptic, and normal to the ecliptic." .





S.T.

GMR defines them as four separate, but interacting fieldforces, of varying dynamic intensity (from A through Band C to D) which annually follow a regular and eccentric course along the plane of the ecliptic, relative to the sun's "apparent path" along the zodiac band as if seen from the earth, i.e., geocentrically. 2. The scientists state that the spiral forces in their swe~pin.g action "influence the activity within the earth's magnetic field," and also "appear to affect the intensity of the cosmic ray bombardment of the earth."

The second reference here is to a phenomenon known as the Forbush Decrease. Every recorded occurrence of this phenomenon that we've been able to check has coincided with a G1~ forecast of high intensity field disturbance. (For a typical example, see SCIENCE IN SPACE, page 269, in the chapter by J.A. Simpson on "Solar Modulation of Cosmic Radiation," showing a diagram for January 21-22, 1957. ~oth dates showed a GMR d+ forecast signal.)

3. The scientists refer to the interplanetary structure as sweeping past the earth once every gz days. They associate this interval with the rotation period of the sun.

GMR reveals (but does not try to explain) that the four forces in their regular, annual course come into a four-way conjunction with the earth's moon in orbit every gz days. It is these conjunct points which set up a trigger action in the current field-disturbance pattern.

4. The scientists' broad reference to the effect of the spiralling forces on "the activity within the earth's magnetic field" can simply be set beside the 20 year GMR record of . forecasts with coincident observed phenomena. This record fills two thick work-books on my shelf, and has been presented, in relevant sections, to many people presumed to be concerned -- from C.N. Anderson in 1941 to Dr. Firor in 1964, not forgetting NASA, the DOD , and several major aviation and space industrial outfits, all of whom dismissed the GMR premise as "metaphysical." The IMP -- a perfect name, under the circumstancesl-would now seem to have proved them all to be in error.

C\~~~c~" (Mrs.) M.B. Hasbrouck ~ Director o·f Research

GMR

Enc.

mbh/b





Symbol Code 4l+ Extra Clear c Clear

'. ,

cd___ d

1+ r -

Partly Clear Mode~ely Disturbed Disturbed

Geomagnetics Research, Inc. Severely Disturbed Sudden Disturbance No change

. 319 EAST 50th stREET

NEW YORK 22. N. Y.

PLAzA 8-1998

Summary ot Correlation between GNa lorecaeta and Ob.erYe4 BYent. trom March 1 tbroup Jue 21,1964

HAO OBSERVATION§ Ma.rch 4-5-6-7 Flares imp. 1 Geomagnetic Storm to 6th' 11-12 'Jlares imp. 1 15-16 Flare. imp. 1. 2. 18 No Observation 21 llare imp. 1+ 24 ' Jllare , imp. 1-

(Noise) April 1-3 Geomagnet1c Star. 5 Flare :~~~tnp. 1-7 " Flare ' imp. 1-9-10-41 Flares imp. 1-12-13 llarea , imp. 1-15-18 Geomagnetic Storm 24 llare imp. 1-27-29 Geomagnet.10 Stor. Ma: 1 2 4 6 ? 10 13-16 18 20-21 24-25 25-31 June -

Geomagnet10 Stor.

Flare Flare

? ' ?

?

imp. 1-1mp. 1-

Geomagnetic Stor. Flare im.p. 1+ !flare imp. 1 Flare imp. 1, No Observation

1 No Observation 8 Flare imp. 1+ 9 Geomagnetic Stor. 10-11 Flares imp. 1-13 ? 14-15-16-17 ~larea imp. 1-21 ' Jlareimp. 1 '

,' ,:" "

" ,

Qua poucaS'f , "

!11) r 4 1&.11) 0+ ~ , 18)4.-20-21) 0+ .. 24) 4++-

1) 4 (,) 0+:11 5) 4+ 7-8) o+r 11~ 4+ 12'0- ' 16 0+r(17) - (18) 4

. 2, 4 ' 26) 4- (~) o ... r

1) 4+- (Volcanic Eruption)-7) d (8) ct.· 9) 4 11) o+r 13) d++-15-16) c+r (Earthquake, Japan)-20)4.-(21)4 (EruptioD, Etna)·

Single Event., Total. 47, Ooinoi4ent. ,a, DoUbttu1. 9 • ~ Series • • total. '2, Oo1Doi4e~'. 2~1 Douo,tul. 8 • 7~

M. B. · Haabrouok Direotor of ae •• aroh





\ Louis Hasbrouck

To:


NEW YORK, N . Y. 10022

PLaza 8:'1'998

Dr. John W. Firor, Director High Altitude Observatory Boulder, Colorado

November 26 1965

A TECHNIQUE FOR THE PREDICTION OF SPACE-TIME DISTURBANCE IN PHYSICAL FIELDS

Hypothesis

~ypothesis, Method, and Potential

Many, if not all field-force distunbances can result from irregularities, or variations in the flow of fie Id-force energie,s throughout the Solar System. The timing of such disturbances can be calculated from the astrono~ical EphemeriS, used in conjunction with a supplementary Ephemeris described below.

M. 8. Hasbrouck

This hypothesis arises from random observation (1938-1940) of certain recurrent correlations between periods of radio blackout (and newsworthy sunspots) and the geocentric longitude of the Sun and any planet, or planets, in certain areas of the zodiacal belt (the apparent annual pathway of the Sun and planets as seen from the Earth.)

No reason for this coincidence_could be found in any system of mathematical astronomy, ancient or modern. Theories of terrestrial IIplanetary influence" had previously been investigated in a general research, and discarded as untenable. Any acceptable rationale for this hypotheSis should start from field physics -Faraday's lines of force in mutual interference, perhaps. But where lay any possible connec~ion between field and Ephemeris?

This problem remained unsolved until the discovery was made in 1941 of what seemed to be a field superstructure within the Solar System -- an annual, four-wave pattern of regular, flowing streams or currents of field-force energy in varying potential. Tabulated from a 19th century version of early astronomical physics·· these four streams or currents were found to provide a constant frame of reference, or coordinate system which, when combined with regular Ephemeris positions of planetary and lunar bodies, could be used to time and evaluate field-force disturbances as points of tension or perturbation within the Solar System fie-1-<1 •

...... "The Golden Dawn" Vol. 4, pp 234-257 (Aries Press, Chicago, 1940)

-





Dr. John IV. Firor Page 2 of 4

Until now, the physical reality of these four superstructure forces could only be inferred from the Continuing accuracy, in several forecasting areas, which this concept made possible.

Recently, however, data transmitted by the IMP-l satellite revealed the existence of a longitudinal sector structure in a four-arm spiral which appears to resemble the GMR field structure as utilized and ~isualized for 25 years. (See att~phed pages from Science, June 18, 1965.)

Method

It can be seen from the above that while the G~ffi system of forecasting utilizes, as a working tool, the regular Ephemeris Tables of geocentric planetary Cl ;::::1 lU:Gal'" motion, these figures are employed only in conjunction with a set of supplementary Tables of the geocentric annual sequence of motion of the four superstructure forces, tabulated in 1942.

These four streams of field-force are found to coincide at regular intervals with the Sun's apparent annual path along the ecliptic (the zodiacal belt) and at irregular, but calculable intervals with the planets and the Moon in their normal motion as tabulated in the regular Ephemeris.

Forecasts of field-force disturbance are worked out by timing and locating -- from both Ephemerides -- any conjunct pOints (in zodiacal degrees) that are simultaneously occupied by the Sun, a planet or planets, and by one or more of the superstructure forces which, in their annual motions, follow the regular zodiac pattern and can be calculated at all times.

It is these conjunct points in time and space which are found to indicate probable periods of primary field-force disturbance. A significant majority of these coincide with a single disturbance phenomenon, or inaugurate a series of secondary &isturbances -- or both. The secondary forecasts, usually significant in close timing of coincident phenomena ~ are acti vated---( or "triggered") according to the relative passage of the Moon. - --

lITriggers ll are calculated from the regular Ephe~~ris figures of the daily and hourly motion of the Moon. Field-force disturbanc~s are frequently observed to coincide -with the formation of geometrical, angular relationships (0°, 90°, 180°) between the Moon in motion and any primary conjunct points -- approaching, COincident, or past -within an average range of two weeks to a month, either way, according to the field geometry of the period under study. _

Geomagnetics Research, Inc.,319 East 50th St.New York,N.Y. 10022 11/26/65

- - - --- - ----------'------'----- - -- ------





Dr. John W. Firor Page 3 of 4

Differentiation of disturbance potential (d,d+,d++) between one forecast and another is deduced from the regularly changing qualities of wave formation in the field superstructure. The four streams of force, or energy, follow an annual course, lining up (literally, from the Earth) with the apparent paths of Sun and planets, but independent of either in their recurrent power potential.

Evaluation of intensity variatiori in the forecasts is therefore based neither on opinion nor on precedent; no two periods of time can ever be alike in all respects. It is based on the adaptation of a tradition in early physics, generally miscalled "the four elements" and symbolized by the names fire, water, air, and earth. From the beginning of science (which wasastponomy)these four forces (or qualities, as defined by Plato) were regarded as the structural basis of cosmology.

As is usually the case with classic symbolism, the symbol tells the story more graphically than any semantic translation. The work of GMR is obviously dealingwith four different levels of dynamic energy, functioning in what is known today as the interplanetary field. The four superstructure forces are therefore represented in the forecasts as A,B,C,and D in four colors -- red, blue, yellow and green. (See enclosed work sheets.)

In order to simplify both calculation and notation of the forecasts -- rather than using the arc of ascension figures from the Nautical Almanac -- the familiar astronomical and zcdiacal symbols are used to represent the Sun, Moon, planets, and the 12 thirty degree divisions of the, solar year which, because of the precession of the equinoxes, no longer correspond to the appropriate constellations.

Potential

"The properties of electromagnetic radiation vary with frequency. For one thing, the radiation is put out in discrete little bundles called ~'quanta" and the energy content of one quantum of a particular radiation is in direct proportion to its frequency. As frequency goes up (and wavelength down) the radiation becomes more energetic, ~nd can interact more thoroughly with matter."

No attempt is made to correlate, at this time, the GMR hypothesis and technique with current scientific theories. ~ut among the many authorities that could be quoted in support -- from Faraday on, or \ back through Kepler to Sir Francis Bacon -- the above, written by Isaac Asimov on page 110 of his lay-reader-oriented book, AddiMi a Dimension (Doubleday, 1964) puts into a few words what the G research team, as creative trespassers, have come to visualize as the probable field fundamentals of the work. It seems probable that the forecasts involve electromagnetic radiation, in varying frequency. The quantum theory haunts the wave patterns of the field superstructure.

Geomagnetics Research, Inc.,3l9 East 50th St.New York,N.Y.10022 11/26/65





Dr. John W. Firor Page 4 of 4

Prediction: Neither does GMR claim the ability to predict any specific phenomenon as certain to cfoincide, to the day and hour, with any forecast. (That would be sheer fortune-telling.) GMR does not predict, in particular, a solar flare, a geomagnetic storm, radio interference, a power failure, an earthquake, a volcanic eruption, or any other phenomenon commonly related to field-force disturbance. ' The GMR predictive technique is neither a crystal ball nor a pushbutton mechanism.

The forecasts are directed toward the timing and evaluation of periods of field-force disturbance which -- as the record shows -tend to coincide with anyone or more of the events, phenomena, or occurrences commonly associated with electromagnetic or other field perturbation. Research so far, limited as it has been, has produced

' a tentative system of classification relative to certain forecasts which has been reasonably good, but by no means perfect. This would seem to indicate that wide research, with technological cooperation and adequate data, could eventually create a system that would differentiate clearly between solar, seismic, and other probabilities of response to any given forecast of ' field-force disturbance.

Timing: GMR forecasts are timed (from the two Ephemerides) for the day on which the forecast formulation takes shape in the interplanetary field. Considerable research and development WOUld be required to indicate, with greater objective assurance, the precise time at which the coin'cident · phenomena might be observable • Several physicists, including Dr. Harlan T. Stetson in 1942, have commented that a discrepancy of 24 to 48 hours between the field forecast and the terrestrially observable event could only be considered a natural factor in dealing with a eomplex (and only partly understood) area such as the interplanetary field.

GEOMAGNETICS RESEARCH, Inc.

by ':~\l.~~ ~ . M. B. Hasbrouck Director of Research

~~-U~.{ Louis Hasbrouck President

Enc. Copy, Regular Ephemeris, ~ovember and December 1965 1\ SQPplementary " . " It "',,

" GMR work sheets for" " " It Copy, pp 1592-1594 from Science, June 18, 1965 Vol. 148

mbh/lh/b

Geomagnetics Research, Inc.,319 East 50th St.New York,N.Y.l0022 11/26/65

=





HIGH ALTITUDE OBSERVATORY

BOULDER, COLORADO 80301

28 February 1964

Mr. M. B. Hasbrouck Director of Research Geomagnetics Research, Inc. 319 East 50th Street New York 22, New York

Dear Mr. Hasbrouck:

Sane time ago we received a memorandum from Geomagnetics Research, Inc. entitled "A Note on Solar Flare Prediction." This memorandum indicates that you believe you have achieved some degree of success in predicting some solar flares.

As you are of course aware, the subject of flare prediction is one receiving much attention from many research groups at the present time. Most of the efforts at detailed flare predictions that I am familiar with have not been at all successful. Therefore I am at present inclined to treat any claims of successful predictions with considerable skepticism until they have been demonstrated. So far I have not seen a scheme demonstrated which is at all helpful in actual flare prediction.

I suspect that before too long some of the staff of the High Altitude Observatory will be called upon to comment on your flare predictions. At that time I would like to be in a position of having evaluated your method or results so that this comment can be made with accuracy. I wonder if you would be willing to help us make such an evaluation. What we need from you is either a detailed description of the method you use to make predictions so that we can make an independent run using this method or, as an alternative, we would need advance forecasts from you for a period of six months or more so that we could statistically study these forecasts.

The study of flares and of their prediction is an area of great practical importance and one in which new ideas and techniques are sorely needed. I hope that you have made progress in this area, and that your work will be of value in the coming years.

JWF/rf

}[~~J~ John W. Firor Director

A Laboratory of the National Center for Atmospheric Research

Operated by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Under Contract with the National Science Foundation

--- ------- ------------------------------- --





.'.l.lQ .Beorp.g,netlcs Research. h~. 'e'l-~ ~ ~ '!¥i¥!!\. ~ ~11..1Il't.

Doc John Firor

He shut the door Ri ght i n the Hasbrouck ' s face , " 0 more, no more" He did i mplore , "Of cosmic time and s pace !

I cannot t hink Beyond the brink Of gadgetry ' s good grace! "

He couldn ' t t hink ; He took to drink ,

Up in that lofty place . The rea son? Well,

I chose to te 11 My tale at a new pace . And so he fell Ri ght down to he ll,

Along the cosmic trace .

AUG 1 1 1964





8tati~ticul ,and - The Sacred Science1. A 20 year record of high level correlation between ......

Documents

Transcript of 8tati~ticul ,and - The Sacred Science1. A 20 year record of high level correlation between ......