8151bunn_e

download 8151bunn_e

of 16

Transcript of 8151bunn_e

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    1/16

    The Nuclear Terrorist Threat to Russia

    and the World -- What is to be Done?

    Matthew Bunn, Harvard University

    2nd Moscow International Nonproliferation Conference

    September 19-20, 2003

    http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/bcsia/atom

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    2/16

    Terrorists and nuclear explosives

    With HEU, gun-typebomb -- as obliteratedHiroshima -- very

    plausibly within

    capabilities ofsophisticated terroristgroup

    Implosion bomb(required for Pu) more

    difficult, stillconceivable (especially ifthey got help)

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    3/16

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    4/16

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    5/16

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    6/16

    Insider threats

    The desperate insider

    Danger in Russia reduced with Russian economic stabilization (butstill frequent incidents of minor theft by soldiers and sailors)

    The greedy/corrupt insider

    e.g., recent arrest of Atomflot deputy director Tyulyakov(corruption? radioactive theft?) -- countless other cases worldwide

    The ideologically sympathetic insider

    e.g., case of Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood in Pakistan

    The blackmailed insider

    Chechens, others have used tactic of kidnapping a child of anofficial -- many other possibilities

    Outsiders and insiders may work together

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    7/16

    Summary: the nuclear terrorist threat

    Do terrorists want nuclear weapons?

    Clear Bin Laden statements, some Chechen interest

    Is it conceivable terrorists could make a crudebomb if they got the material?

    Is there material that might be vulnerable to

    theft and transfer to terrorists?

    Is it likely that terrorists, if they had a crudedevice, could smuggle it to Moscow,

    Washington, or New York?

    Yes No

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    8/16

    Much has been accomplished

    to reduce this threat

    Russian unilateral steps to tighten security for nuclearfacilities -- especially since Chechen terrorist attacks, 9/11

    U.S.-Russian cooperation has improved security forhundreds of tons of potential bomb material, thousands of

    nuclear warheads, at dozens of sites

    Enough bomb material for thousands of nuclear weaponshas been permanently destroyed

    Project Vinca (removal of HEU from Yugoslavia) showedpotential for U.S.-Russian cooperation to address insecurestockpiles around the world

    Hundreds of dedicated Russian and U.S. experts have mademajor contribution to world security

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    9/16

    But much remains to be done

    138 MT

    108 MT

    354 MT

    Comprehensive Upgrades

    Rapid Upgrades

    Cooperative Upgrades Not

    Completed

    MT=Metric Tons

    Weapons-Usable Material MPC&A Upgradesin Russia Expected by Oct. 1, 2003

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    10/16

    Strong Presidential statements highlight

    the danger of terrorists with WMD

    Bush:

    The gravest danger our Nation faces lies at the crossroads of radicalismand technology. Our enemies have openly declared that they areseeking weapons of mass destruction.History will judge harshly those

    who saw this coming danger but failed to act.-- National Security Strategy of the United States of America, 9/02

    Putin:

    We do not think that the major threats nowadays are presented by

    ICBMsWe all know exactly how New York and Washington werehitWas it ICBMs? What threat are we talking about? We are talkingabout the use of mass destruction weapons terrorists may obtainchemical weapons, biological weapons, and so on. Russia is convincedthat this is what should be given the most serious thought to.

    -- Press conference, 1/01

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    11/16

    Matching statements to actions

    If they really see nuclear terrorism as a high-priority threat:

    Why have disputes over access to sensitive sites, liability and taxissues, slow contracting procedures, visa problems, and otherimpediments been allowed to slow progress in securing nuclear

    weapons and materials for years? Why were security and accounting for nuclear stockpiles around the

    world not identified as a priority of the Global Partnership?

    Why has the Russian government consistently underfunded its ownnuclear security upgrade programs (e.g., $200M cost to meet

    Russian physical protection regulations -- GAN 2002 report)? Why has the Russian government only given the 12th GUMO the

    resources to install a handful of the already-purchased site securityupgrade kits each year, leaving equipment in warehouses for years?

    Why has the U.S. government decided not to help upgrade security

    for Russian operational tactical warhead sites?

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    12/16

    Key priorities if the Presidents agreed on

    a high-priority cooperative program

    Global cleanout -- fast-paced effort to remove nuclearmaterial from most vulnerable sites around the world

    Accelerated, strengthened MPC&A cooperation

    Fast-paced agreed deadline -- e.g., FSU upgrades done in 4 years

    Focus also on sustainability -- security that will last, including afterinternational assistance ends

    Security strong enough to meet post-9/11 threats

    Requires Presidential decision to finally resolve access issue, sweepaside other impediments to acceleration

    Joint U.S.-Russian efforts to cooperate with other countries-- e.g., Pakistan, India, China -- to improve nuclear security

    Accelerated blend-down of HEU; securing and monitoringmost dangerous warheads; strengthened global standards;

    expanded support for the IAEA

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    13/16

    The challenge

    If Presidents Bush and Putin really believed that nuclearterrorism was an urgent threat, and that actions they couldtake could substantially reduce it, many problems would besolved -- how do we convince them?

    If the two Presidents announced that they had agreed toreduce this threat as much as possible as quickly as

    possible, what specific actions would we recommend?

    On the day after a nuclear terrorist attack, what would wewish we had done to prevent it?

    Why arent we doing it now?

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    14/16

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    15/16

    2010: the danger

    Multiple unrecovered thefts of weapons-usable nuclearmaterial have occurred

    Weapons-usable nuclear materials in some countries aroundthe world remain dangerously insecure -- as do nuclear

    power plants and spent fuel facilities in some countries

    Substantial numbers of large radioactive sources remainunaccounted for

    Intelligence indicates that a thriving black market in nuclearmaterial exists, and that several terrorist groups, as well asstates such as North Korea, Iraq, and Iran, have gainedaccess to enough weapons-usable material for a bomb

    Nuclear terrorist attacks may have already occurred -- or

    could occur at any time

  • 8/10/2019 8151bunn_e

    16/16

    For further reading

    Controlling Nuclear Warheads and Materials

    http://www.nti.org/cnwm

    Letter Report from the Co-Chairs of the Joint Committee onU.S.-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Non-Proliferation,John P. Holdren and Nikolai P. Laverov

    http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/s02052003?OpenDocument