8-8 AC Dial - HCPronew employees are ready for training. ... specific product launch,...
Transcript of 8-8 AC Dial - HCPronew employees are ready for training. ... specific product launch,...
Conference Name: CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
Scheduled Conference Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2006
Scheduled Conference Time: 1:00 p.m.–2:30 p.m. (Eastern), 12:00 p.m.–1:30 p.m. (Central), 11:00 a.m.– 12:30 p.m. (Mountain), 10:00 a.m.–11:30 a.m (Pacific)
Scheduled Conference Duration: 90 Minutes
PLEASE NOTE: If the audioconference occurs April through October, the time reflects daylight savings. If yourarea does NOT observe daylight savings, times will be one hour earlier.
Your registration entitles you to ONE telephone connection to the audioconference. Invite as many people as you wish to listen to the audioconference on your speakerphone.
Permission is given to make copies of the written materials for anyone else who is listening.
In order to avoid delays in connecting to the conference, we recommend that you dial into the audioconference 15 minutes prior to the start time.
Dial-In Instructions:1. Dial 866-468-3121 fifteen minutes prior to the conference start time.2. Press 1 to join as a participant (listen-only mode).3. Enter conference ID 080806 followed by # sign.4. You will hear three beeps and then be greeted by an Operator who will confirm your participation and enter you
into the call.5. You will hear music on hold until the conference is started, or be connected directly to the conference if it has
already begun.6. During the conference, you will be in listen-only mode, until such time as you are enabled to ask questions.
Technical Difficulties1. If you experience any difficulties with the dial-in process or need technical assistance, please call the conference
center reservation line at 877-297-2901.
Q&A Session1. To enter the questioning queue during the Q&A session, callers need to push the number “1” key on their
touch-tone phones. Note: For most programs, this portion of the program generally falls after the first hour of presentation. Please do not try to enter the queue before this portion of the program.
2. If you prefer not to ask your question on the air, you can email your question to [email protected]. However, note that you can only email your question during the program.
Prior to the ProgramIf you prefer not to ask your question on the air, you can send your questions via e-mail to [email protected]. Thedeadline for questions is 08/07/06 @ 5:30 PM EST. Please note that it is likely that not all questions will be answered.
Program Evaluation Survey In your materials on page 2, we have included a Program Evaluation Letter that has the URL link to our program survey.We would appreciate it if when you return to your office you would go to the link provided and complete the survey.
Continuing Education Documentation If CE’s are offered with this program, a separate link containing important information will be provided along with the pro-gram materials. Please follow the instructions in the CE documentation.
Dial-In Instructions
PP rr oo gg rr aa mm EE vv aa ll uu aa tt ii oo nn
Dear Program Participant,
Thank you for attending the HCPro program today. We hope you found it to be informa-tive and helpful.
To ensure a positive experience for our customers and to deliver the best possible prod-ucts and services, we would like your feedback. Because your time is valuable, we havelimited the evaluation to some brief questions found at the link below:
http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?p=WEB225HS3ZYA57
We would also ask that you forward the link to others in your facility who attended theprogram for their input as well. To ensure that your completed form receives our atten-tion, please return to us within six days from the date of this program.
If you enjoyed this program, you may purchase a tape or CD at the special attendeeprice of just $70. Simply call our customer service team at 800/650-6787, and mentionyour source code: SURVEYAD. Keep the tape or CD handy, and listen again at yourconvenience--whenever you or your staff might benefit from a refresher, or when yournew employees are ready for training.
We appreciate your time and suggestions. We hope that you will continue to rely onHCPro programs as an important resource for pertinent and timely information.
Sincerely,
Frank MorelloDirector of MultimediaHCPro, Inc.
200 Hoods Lane PO Box 1168 Marblehead MA 01945 TEL 781 639 1872 FAX 781 639 7857 URL www.hcpro.com
CME vs. Promotion:Understanding MedEd
Compliance
1 p.m.–2:30 p.m. (Eastern)
12 p.m.–1:30 p.m. (Central)
11 a.m.–12:30 p.m. (Mountain)
10 a.m.–11:30 a.m. (Pacific)
presents . . .
A 90-minute interactive audioconference
Tuesday, August 8, 2006
ii CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
In our materials, we strive to provide our audience with useful, timely information. The live audioconferencewill follow the enclosed agenda. Occasionally, our speakers will refer to the materials enclosed. We havenoticed that other non-HCPro audioconference materials follow the speaker’s presentation bullet-by-bullet,page-by-page. Because our presentations are less rigid and rely more on speaker interaction, we do notinclude each speaker’s entire presentation. The materials contain helpful forms, crosswalks, policies, charts,and graphs. We hope that you find this information useful in the future.
HCPro is not affiliated in any way with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations,which owns the JCAHO trademark.
iiiCME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
The “CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance” audioconference materials package is pub-lished by HCPro, 200 Hoods Lane, P.O. Box 1168, Marblehead, MA 01945.
Copyright 2006, HCPro, Inc.
Attendance at the audioconference is restricted to employees, consultants, and members of the medical staffof the Licensee.
The audioconference materials are intended solely for use in conjunction with the associated HCPro audio-conference. Licensee may make copies of these materials for internal use by attendees of the audioconfer-ence only. All such copies must bear this legend. Dissemination of any information in these materials or theaudioconference to any party other than the Licensee or its employees is strictly prohibited.
Advice given is general, and attendees and readers of the materials should consult professional counsel forspecific legal, ethical, or clinical questions. HCPro is not affiliated in any way with the Joint Commission onAccreditation of Healthcare Organizations, which owns the JCAHO trademark.
For more information, contact
HCPro, Inc. 200 Hoods LaneP.O. Box 1168Marblehead, MA 01945Phone: 800/650-6787Fax: 781/639-0179E-mail: [email protected] site: www.hcpro.com
iv CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
Dear colleague,
Thank you for participating in our “CME vs. Promotion: UnderstandingMedEd Compliance” audioconference with Keith Korenchuk, ChristopherKing, John DeHart, and Barbara A Fuchs, MSA, moderated by BryanCote. We are excited about the opportunity to interact with you directly andencourage you to take advantage of the opportunity to ask our experts yourquestions during the audioconference. If you would like to submit a questionbefore the audioconference, please send it to [email protected] and pro-vide the program date in the subject line. We cannot guarantee that yourquestion will be answered during the program, but we will do our best to takea good cross section of questions.
If at any time you have comments, suggestions, or ideas about how wemight improve our audioconference, or if you have any questions aboutthe audioconference itself, please do not hesitate to contact me. And if youwould like any additional information about other products and services,please contact our Customer Service Department at 800/650-6787.
Along with these audioconference materials, we have enclosed an evalua-tion. After the audioconference, please take a minute to complete the eval-uation to let us know what you think. We value your opinion.
Thanks again for working with us.
Best regards,
Shannon TierneyAudioconference ProducerFax: 781/639-2982E-mail: [email protected]
200 Hoods LaneP.O. Box 1168
Marblehead, MA 01945Tel: 800/650-6787Fax: 800/639-8511
vCME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vi
Speaker profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vii
Exhibit A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Presentation by Keith Korenchuk, Christopher King, John DeHart, and Barbara A.Fuchs, MSA
Exhibit B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19CME Requirements by State
Exhibit C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23Resource Materials - Keith Korenchuk
Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
Contents
vi CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
Agenda
I. CME Legal DevelopmentsA. What’s new? (Cases, regulatory action, lessons learned analysis)B. What’s coming?C. How to prepareD. OIG, FDA and other regulatory developmentsE. Practical recommendations for improving internal controls as
surveillance heats up
II. Role of CME and Traditional Medical EducationA. What’s more beneficial to the marketer and why?B. Marketing/Sales “hands-off” policy for CMEC. CME as “value-added” service for physicians
III. Is CME worth it? If so, how do you improve your internal process for more effective education
A. Strategies to improve the brand team and medical affairs relationshipB. Stakeholder communicationC. MeetingsD. Negotiating spending for CME
IV. Gray Area Scenarios/Panel DiscussionA. Scenario presentedB. Analysis
Live Q&A
viiCME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
Speaker profiles
Keith Korenchuk
Keith Korenchuk is a Partner at McGuire Woods, LLP, located in Washington, DC. He counsels and advisespharmaceutical, life sciences, medical device, and specialty pharmacy companies in the United States andaround the world. The focus of his work is on the regulatory and compliance challenges confronting these sec-tors under federal, state, and international laws. He provides guidance and assistance on matters ranging fromdesign and implementation of compliance systems, specific product launch, sales/marketing and complianceissues, internal and government investigations, and negotiation and implementation of strategic relationships toenable companies to achieve their business objectives in a complex operating and regulatory environment.
His experience includes serving as CEO of organizations focusing on pharmaceutical and healthcare sectorcompliance, as well as technology research and development; providing a full range of analysis, assessment,and guidance in pharmaceutical, life sciences, and healthcare regulatory and compliance matters; cochairing anational health law department of a top 100 American law firm; and coordinating, managing, and implementingcomplex strategic alliances, joint ventures, and business arrangements.
He is actively engaged in providing pharmaceutical, life sciences, medical device, and specialty pharmacy com-panies with regulatory, business, and compliance guidance, advice, and solutions.
Christopher King
Christopher King is a Managing Partner at CMEsolutions, LLC, located in Tucson, AZ. He has over 30 years ofexperience in developing products and markets in the pharmaceutical/biotech industry. Since 1997, he has beenManaging Partner of CMEsolutions. Chris began his career in the healthcare industry when he joined Pfizer,Inc., in 1975, and then Bayer in 1983 where he gained a broad range of industry experience in a series ofsales, marketing, and management positions in several therapeutic categories.
He is a graduate of Niagara University with a B.S. in Finance/Marketing.
John DeHart
John DeHart is a Managing Partner at CMEsolutions, LLC, located in Tucson, AZ. In 1978, He joined Bayer’sBiological Products Division. His career with Bayer represented almost 20 years in the sales, marketing, andmanagement of biological and pharmaceutical products. Before leaving Bayer in 1996, he was responsible forthe coordination and management of all immunological products worldwide, establishing both tactical and strate-gic objectives, with full budget responsibilities. He left Bayer to cofound CMEsolutions. He has a B.S. degreefrom Weber Sate University in Accounting, Finance, and Marketing.
viii CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
Barbara A. Fuchs, MSA
Barbara A. Fuchs is an Associate Director in Professional Education Support at Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. Shehas many years of experience as a healthcare professional, holding key clinical and administrative positions inhealthcare organizations including managed care. Prior to joining Wyeth, she served as the Executive Directorof a for-profit continuing medical education (CME) company. This has given her a unique perspective on theregulations governing CME as well as the grant process.
She is also an adjunct professor in the nursing program at Eastern University, a Certified Professional inHealthcare Quality, and a frequent faculty member at the Annual Meeting of the Alliance for Continuing MedicalEducation.
Bryan Cote, Moderator
Bryan Cote is an award-winning writer with more than 10 years of experience in healthcare journalism, publicrelations, and speech writing. As executive editor at HCPro, he writes and edits newsletters on Medicare reformand pharmaceutical reimbursement and compliance issues. He is the author of the MMA Impact Report Series,which included a report on the expected shift in infusion therapy to the hospital outpatient setting. In 2000, hewon a New England Press Association award for healthcare feature writing and in 1999 won a newsletter writ-ing award for his public relations work for Charlotte Hungerford Hospital in Connecticut.
Exhibit A
Presentation by Keith Korenchuk, Christopher King, John DeHart, and Barbara A. Fuchs, MSA
EXHIBIT A
2 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
CME vs. Promotion:Understanding MedEd
Compliance
Presented by:
Keith Korenchuk, McGuire Woods LLP
Christopher King, CMEsolutions, LLC
John Dehart, CMEsolutions, LLC
Barbara Fuchs, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
2
CME Legal Developments
� What's new, What's coming, How to prepare?
� Focus on 5 CME Minefields
� Reference Materials (Exhibit C)
3CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT A
3
CME Minefield #1:Third Party Initiated Programs
� Standards
� Available Guidance
� “Independence”
� Monitoring/Auditing
4
CME Minefield #2:Program Funding Decisions
� Departmental Approval
� Integrity of Decision Making
� Permissible / Impermissible Linkages
EXHIBIT A
4 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
5
CME Minefield #3:Content/Program/Speaker Reviews
� Internal Standards
� Guidance
� Scientific / Marketing Boundaries
6
CME Minefield #4:Locations
� Resorts
� Cruise Ships
� Non-resort locations
� Appearances
5CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT A
7
CME Minefield #5:Meals
� Types
� Linkage
� Guests
� Funding
8
Role of CME and TraditionalMedical Education
� Which is more beneficial to the manufacturerand why?
� Marketing/Sales "hands-off" policy for CME
� CME as "value-added" service for physicians
EXHIBIT A
6 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
9
Q. When considering CME versus
traditional medical education,
which is more beneficial to
the manufacturer and why?
10
A. It Depends!
Building advocacyRisk management
•Controlledsubstances
•Black box
Late lifecycleNew Indication
LaunchPre-launch
Post-launchLaunch
Therapeutic leadership
“Me-too”Combination therapies
DifferentiationDisease state awareness
When MedEd is beneficialWhen CME is beneficial
7CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT A
11
Q. What should CME “Hands-Off”
mean to me and why?
12
A. Practical CME “Hands-Off”Considerations
As a marketer you need to avoid any perception ofbias and/or that you are offering an inducementto recommend or prescribe your product
� Oversight of grant process moved from marketing
and sales to medical affairs
� Distribution of activities limited to CME provider and
joint sponsor
� Sales materials must be outside the room of any live
activity
� All content must be controlled by CME provider
EXHIBIT A
8 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
13
How can Marketing and SalesParticipate?
� Can internally recommend physician unmet needs
� May internally recommend thought leaders
� Can distribute CME invitations
� Can attend CME live programs
14
Q. What is the real value of
CME?
9CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT A
15
A. Physicians Depend On ItPhysicians are constantly challenged by patients and
payors to stay up to date with treatment guidelines, newtherapies, etc.
� Meets an unmet educational need
� Unbiased and evidence-based content
� Required for ongoing license
� Improves physician skills
� Improves patient care
“CME is my lifeblood for improved patient care”
16
A. Value to Commercial Supporter
� Builds a better corporate image
� Strengthens physician skills
� Helps to meet the educational needs ofphysicians
� Improves patient care
� Demonstrates therapeutic leadership
EXHIBIT A
10 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
17
Is CME Worth It?Improving Internal Processes for More Effective Education
� Strategies to improve the brand team andmedical affairs relationship
� Stakeholder communication
� Meetings
� Negotiating spending for CME
18
Improving the Brand Team and
Education Department Relationship
� Developing rapport
� Rules of engagement
� Encourage compliant participation
11CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT A
19
Stakeholder Communication
� Critical to Success
� Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly
� Updates via email
� Ad hoc meetings
20
Business StrategyDevelopment
� Education strategist attends developmentmeetings to understand the focus of the brandfor the year.
� Includes focus on clinical trials in development,in progress, or completed
� Includes any market or other research analysis
� Includes discussion about anticipated level of
funding
EXHIBIT A
12 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
21
CME: Not Always the Answer
� “Me-too” products
• No real differentiation
• No current trials or papers
� High involvement by patients/patient advocatesin decisions
• No new breakthroughs, mature product
• Increase consumer not HCP education
� Current labeling very limited though some off-label use is occurring
• risk mitigation
22
Education Strategy Plan
� Education strategist attends Business StrategyDevelopment
� Education Plan and Budget are developed
� Plan and Budget are presented
� Budget is approved
� Funding is transferred to Education authority
� Plan is implemented
13CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT A
23
Meetings
� Weekly
• Brand Team contact
�Status of current educational activities
�Discussion of any issues/concerns
�Opportunity for mutual training
• Other members of the Brand Team and/or
education team, as needed
�Close follow-up of specific challenges
24
Meetings (cont’d)
� Monthly
• Marketing and Education
�Launch of new education initiatives
�Review/description of approved proposals
�Review of the budget (running total)
�General accounts, not specific activities
�After initial funding, Marketing may add funding at
the beginning of each quarter*
EXHIBIT A
14 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
25
Meetings (cont’d)
� Monthly (2)
• Internal Associations contact and Education
Strategist
�Review of current overall plan
� Association Annual Meeting Sponsorship
� Resulting educational funding opportunities
�Coordinate attendance at Association annualmeetings or visits to Association headquarters
26
Meetings (cont’d)
� Quarterly
� Full team meeting may include Senior
Management and:
�Marketing
�Sales
�Global Medical Affairs
�Global Professional Relations
�Market research
�Legal
�Finance
15CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT A
27
Meetings (cont’d)
� Quarterly (continued)
• Provides an opportunity for discussion of changes
in strategy or other “course corrections”
• Provides an opportunity for education/updates to
the broader team
28
Education Plan Development
� Review of business plan
� Review of the literature
� Review of previous education activitiesevaluations and outcomes data
� Assessment of synergies between business planand review identified
� Development of a needs assessmentincorporating identified educational gaps thatalign with the scientific interests of the company
EXHIBIT A
16 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
29
Education Plan (cont’d)
� Assessment of the target audiences
� Assessment of the types of activities mostappropriate to the needs of the learners
� There are no specific tactics described in theplan
30
Budget Development
� Development includes:
• Assessment of the learning strategies required
and an estimated budget for each
• Review of the previous year’s “spend”
• Overall funding level anticipated by the Marketing
Team for grant funding
17CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT A
31
Negotiating Spending for CME
The education strategist must:
� Provide a compelling argument for the CME
funding requested and
� Be good stewards of the money
• Keep the team informed
• Demonstrate educational effectiveness
32
Negotiating spending for CME(cont’d)
� The education strategist must:
• Balance quality education with the scientific
interests of the company
• Understand the brand with respect to consumer
and/or promotional needs
• Share the results of objective educational
effectiveness outcomes data reflecting physician
change in behavior that ultimately improve patient
care
EXHIBIT A
18 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
33
Summary
� CME can be an important component of theBrand budget allocation
� Sharing of knowledge and training between the
Brand Team and the Education Strategist is keyto developing a successful education plan
� A successful education strategy can bemeasured by the outcomes of knowledge gain orbehavior change of the participants as a result ofthe education
� CME is not always the answer
34
Q & A Session
� New and recent cases: Any interestingimplications?
� Regulatory developments: Any interestingimplications?
� 2007 CME Focus: Where is the government goingto focus next?
� What CAN we do?
� Faculty selection: Any tactical ideas to handle thisin compliance, but more effectively?
Audience Questions
Exhibit B
CME Requirements by State
Source: CMEsolutions, LLC. Reprinted with permission.
EXHIBIT B
20 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
State Medical Licensure Requirements and Statistics, 2006/ 47
Continuing Medical Education for Licensure Reregistration
Fifty-eight boards (including Wyoming, as of January 1,2007) require anywhere from 12 hours (Alabama) to 50hours (several states) of continuing medical education(CME) per year for license reregistration. Some states alsomandate CME content, such as HIV/AIDS, risk manage-ment, or end of life palliative care. In addition, many states also require that a certain percentage of CME becategory 1, as measured, for example, through theAmerican Medical Association Physician’s RecognitionAward. Forty states accept the AMA PRA certificate asequivalent for purposes of licensure reregistration.
Additional Notes for Specific Licensing Jurisdictions
California—All general internists and family physicianswho have a patient population of which more than 25%are 65 years of age or older shall complete at least 20%of all mandatory continuing education hours in geriatricmedicine or the care of older patients.
All physicians and surgeons shall complete mandatorycontinuing education in the subjects of pain managementand the treatment of terminally ill and dying patients (one-time requirement of 12 credit hours, to be completed byDecember 31, 2006). Physicians practicing in pathology orradiology specialty areas are exempt from this requirement.
Florida—Physicians may complete a 1-hour CME courseon end-of-life and palliative health care in lieu of therequired 1-hour CME course on HIV/AIDS, provided thephysician completed the HIV/AIDS course in the imme-diately preceding biennium (2-year licensure term).
Physicians may complete a 1-hour CME course on end-of-life and palliative health care in lieu of the required 1-hour CME course on domestic violence, provided thephysician completed the domestic violence course in theimmediately preceding biennium (2-year licensure term).
Maryland—Partial CME credit is offered for AmericanBoard of Medical Specialties (ABMS) certification, selectpeer review, serving as a intervenor or monitor on a physi-cian rehabilitation committee or professional committee,and serving as a preceptor for resident physicians or med-ical students in LCME-accredited schools. For first licenserenewal, the CME requirement is waived, but the licenseemust have completed an approved orientation program.
Pennsylvania—Regulation on the amount of category 1hours required is currently being drafted.
Washington Osteopathic—Other certificates accepted asequivalent include current certification of CME from med-ical practice academies and original certification or recerti-fication within 6 years by a specialty board.
21CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT B
48 / State Medical Licensure Requirements and Statistics, 2006
Table 15Continuing Medical Education for Licensure Reregistration
Required Average AMA/AOA/AAFP/ACOGNumber of CME Hours Category 1 Hours Certificates Accepted State-Mandated CME Content/Hours per Year(s) per Year Required as Equivalent Additional Notes
Alabama 24 hrs 2 yrs 12 24 ACOG, AAFP
Alaska 50 hrs 2 yrs 25 25 AMA PRA, ABMS, AOA, APA
Arizona 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 ABMS, GME 40 hrs within 2-yr timeframe
Arizona DO 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 20 Category 1-A only
Arkansas 20 hrs 1 yr 20 20 AMA PRA
California* 100 hrs 4 yrs 25 100 AMA PRA, AAFP, CMA, CAFP Pain management/geriatric medicine (see note)
California DO 150 hrs 3 yrs 50 90 AMA PRA, AAFP, CMA, CAFP, AOA 60 hrs Category 1-A or 1-Bpain management/geriatric med
Colorado none
Connecticut none
Delaware 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AMA PRA, AOA
DC none
Florida* 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AMA PRA HIV/AIDS, domestic violence, TB,end of life palliative care, med error
Florida DO 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 20 HIV/AIDS, domestic violence, risk (AOA Category 1-A) management, FL rules/laws,
use/abuse of controlled substances,2 hrs prevention of medical errors
Georgia 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AOA, AAFP, ACOG, ACEP
Guam 100 hrs 2 yrs 50 50 AMA PRA, AOA, AAFP, ACOG, ACEP
Hawaii 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AMA PRA
Hawaii DO none
Idaho 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AMA PRA, ABMS, AOA
Illinois 150 hrs 3 yrs 50 60 AMA PRA, AOA
Indiana none
lowa 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 Child/dependent adult abuse
Kansas 50 hrs 1 yr 50 20 AMA PRA, AAFP, ABMS, GME, AOA
Kentucky 60 hrs 3 yrs 20 30 AMA PRA, ABMS One-time domestic violence course for primary care physicans; HIV/AIDS; course must be approvedby Kentucky Cabinet for Hlth Svcs
Louisiana 20 hrs 1 yr 20 20 AMA PRA One-time board orientation course
Maine 100 hrs 2 yrs 50 40 AMA PRA, ABMS, AAFP
Maine DO 100 hrs 2 yrs 50 20 AMA PRA, AOA
Maryland* 50 hrs 2 yrs 25 50 AMA PRA (see note)
Massachusetts 100 hrs 2 yrs 50 40 AMA PRA, GME Study board reqs; risk mgmt
Michigan 150 hrs 3 yrs 50 75
Michigan DO 150 hrs 3 yrs 50 60 60 hrs Category 1-A or 1-B
Minnesota 75 hrs 3 yrs 25 75 AMA PRA, AOA, MOCOMP
Mississippi 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 ABMS, AOA, AAFP, ACOG
Missouri 50 hrs 2 yrs 25 50 AAFP
Montana none
Nebraska 50 hrs 2 yrs 25 50 AMA PRA
Nevada 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AMA PRA Ethics (2 hrs), 20 hrs in specialty;4 hrs bioterrorism
Nevada DO 35 hrs 1 yr 35 10 AMA PRA
EXHIBIT B
22 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
State Medical Licensure Requirements and Statistics, 2006/ 49
New Hampshire 150 hrs 3 yrs 50 60 AMA PRA, ABMS Credits reported to NH Med Soc
New Jersey 100 hrs 2 yrs 50 40 AOA Cultural competence
New Mexico 75 hrs 3 yrs 25 75 AMA PRA, ABMS, AAFP, ACOG
New Mexico DO 75 hrs 3 yrs 25 75 AMA PRA, ABMS, AAFP, ACOG, Active membership in AOA mayUSMLE replace 75 hours of CME
New York none Infection control, child abuse
North Carolina 150 hrs 3 yrs 50 60
North Dakota 60 hrs 3 yrs 20 60 AMA PRA, AOA, AAFP, MOCOMP
Ohio 100 hrs 2 yrs 50 40 AMA PRA CME must be OSMA/OOA-certified
Oklahoma 60 hrs 3 yrs 20 60 AMA PRA, ABMS
Oklahoma DO 16 hrs 1 yr 16 16 16 hrs of Category 1, 1 hr of which must be CME on prescribingcontrolled substances (every 2 yrs)
Oregon none
Pennsylvania 100 hrs 2 yrs 50 20 AMA PRA 12 hrs patient safety/risk mgmt
Pennsylvania DO 100 hrs 2 yrs 50 20 Regulations being drafted 20 hrs Category 1-A;12 hrs risk management
Puerto Rico 60 hrs 3 yrs 20 40 AMA PRA
Rhode Island 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AMA PRA, AOA HIV universal precautions/blood-borne pathogens; end of lifeeducation/palliative care
South Carolina 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 ABMS, AOA, ACOG equivalent
South Dakota none
Tennessee 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AMA PRA, AAFP
Tennessee DO 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 40 AOA, AAFP
Texas 24 hrs 1 yr 24 12 AMA PRA, AAFP, AOA Of 12 hrs Category 1, at least 1 hr in ethics/prof. responsibility
Utah 40 hrs 2 yrs 20 20 AMA PRA
Vermont none
Vermont DO 30 hrs 2 yrs 15 AMA PRA At least 12 of 30 hrs mustbe osteopathic med education
Virgin Islands 40 hrs 1 yr 40 25 AMA PRA
Virginia 60 hrs 2 yrs 30 30 Of Category 1, 15 hrs must be interactive
Washington 200 hrs 4 yrs 50 80 AMA PRA, ABMS, AAFP, ACOG
Washington DO* 150 hrs 3 yrs 50 60 AMA PRA, AOA, others (see note)
West Virginia 50 hrs 2 yrs 25 50 AMA PRA, ABMS (partial) 2 hrs end-of-life pain management
West Virginia DO 32 hrs 2 yrs 16 16 Board-recognized equivalent 2 hrs end-of-life management
Wisconsin 30 hrs 2 yrs 15 30 AMA PRA
Wyoming 60 hrs 3 yrs 20 60 AMA PRA Effective Jan 1, 2007
Abbreviations
ABMS—certification or recertification by a member board of the American Board of Medical Specialties; AMA PRA—American Medical Association Physician’sRecognition Award; AOA—American Osteopathic Association; AAFP—AmericanAcademy of Family Practice; ACOG—American College of Obstetricians andGynecologists; APA—American Pediatric Association; CMA—California MedicalAssociation; CAFP—California Academy of Family Physicians; CME—continuing medicaleducation; FLEX—Federation Licensing Examination; GME—graduate medical educa-tion; MOCOMP—Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; OSMA—OhioState Medical Association; USMLE—United States Medical Licensing Association
Table 15 (continued)Continuing Medical Education for Licensure Reregistration
Required Average AMA/AOA/AAFP/ACOGNumber of CME Hours Category 1 Hours Certificates Accepted State-Mandated CME Content/Hours per Year(s) per Year Required as Equivalent Additional Notes
* Refer to introductory text to this table for more information on this state’s regulations.
Note: All information should be verified with licensing board; medical licenses are granted to those physicians meeting all state requirements—at the discretion of the board.
Exhibit C
Resource Materials - Keith Korenchuk
Source: Keith Korenchuk. Reprinted with permission.
EXHIBIT C
24 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
1
RESOURCE MATERIALS
Keith M. KorenchukPartner
McGuireWoods LLPWashington D.C.
2
The Roadmap Through the
Minefield in Three Parts
• The Concerns
• The Guidance
• The Specific Challenge Areas
25CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
3
Part I: The Concerns
• The Antikickback Statute
• FDA Requirements
• Off-label Promotion
4
The Concerns:
The Antikickback Statute
Although liability under the anti-kickback statute ultimately turns on a party’s intent, it is possible to identify arrangements or practices that may present a significant potential for abuse.
Initially, a manufacturer should identify any remunerative relationship between itself (or its representatives) and persons or entities in a position to generate federal health care business for the manufacturer directly or indirectly.
The next step is to determine whether any one purpose of the remuneration may be to induce or reward the referral or recommendation of business payable in whole or in part by a Federal health care program.
EXHIBIT C
26 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
5
The Concerns:
• FDA Requirements
• Off-label Promotion
6
Part II: The Guidance
• FDA Guidance
• OIG Compliance Guidance
• PhRMA Code
• ACCME Guidance on CME
27CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
7
Part III: Specific Challenge
Areas
8
CME Minefield #1:
Company Initiated Programs
• Risks
• Available Guidance
• Critical Issues
• Are they ever acceptable?
EXHIBIT C
28 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
9
FDA Guidance:
Programs and materials performed and disseminated by companies are subject to the labeling and advertising provisionsof the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Discussions of unapproved uses, which can be an important
component of scientific and educational activities, are not
permissible in programs that are or can be (because the
provider is not functionally independent) subject to substantive
influence by companies that market products related to the
discussion. FDA recognizes that industry-supported activities
can be both nonpromotional and educational.
These provisions require the company to ensure that the
content does not promote unapproved uses, and that
discussions of the company’s products are not false or
misleading and do not lack fair balance.
10
FDA Guidance:
In determining whether an activity is independent of the substantive influence of a company, FDA examines whether and to what extent the company is in a position to influence the presentation of information related to its products or otherwise transform an ostensibly independent program into a promotional vehicle.
FDA is concerned that companies may influence the content of educational programs both directly and indirectly. Directly, by being involved in the selection of speakers or in the treatment of topics. Indirectly, through the nature of the relationship between the
company and the provider.
29CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
11
OIG Guidance: Kickbacks
• Does the arrangement or practice have a potential to interfere with, or
skew, clinical decision-making? Does it have a potential to undermine
the clinical integrity of a formulary process? If the arrangement or
practice involves providing information to decision-makers, prescribers,
or patients, is the information complete, accurate, and not misleading?
• Does the arrangement or practice have a potential to increase costs to
the federal health care programs, beneficiaries, or enrollees? Does the
arrangement or practice have the potential to be a disguised discount to
circumvent the Medicaid Rebate Program Best Price calculation?
• Does the arrangement or practice have a potential to increase the risk of
overutilization or inappropriate utilization?
• Does the arrangement or practice raise patient safety or quality of care
concerns?
Manufacturers should ask the following questions, among others, about any problematic arrangements or practices they identify:
12
PhRMA Code: Educational or
Professional Meetings
Financial support should not be offered for the costs of travel, lodging, or other personal expenses of non-faculty healthcare professionals. Similarly funding should not be offered to compensate for the time spent by healthcare professionals attending the conference or meeting.
EXHIBIT C
30 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
13
CME Minefield #2:
Third Party Initiated Programs
• Standards
• Available Guidance
• “Independence”
• Monitoring/Auditing
14
OIG Guidance: Education
Absent unusual circumstances, grants or support for educational activities sponsored and organized by medical professional organizations raise little risk of fraud or abuse, provided that the grant or support is not restricted or conditioned with respect to content or faculty.
Pharmaceutical manufacturers often provide funding to other sponsors of CME programs. Manufacturers should take steps to ensure that neither they, nor their representatives, are using these activities to channel improper remuneration to physicians or others in a position to generate business for the manufacturer or to influence or control the content of the program.
31CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
15
PhRMA Code: Third-Party
Educational or Professional
MeetingsAny financial support should be given to the conference’s
sponsor which, in turn, can use the money to reduce the overall
conference registration fee for all attendees. Responsibility for
and control over the selection of content, faculty, educational
methods, materials, and venue belongs to the organizers of the
conferences or meetings in accordance with their guidelines.
Financial support should not be offered for the costs of travel,
lodging, or other personal expenses of non-faculty healthcare
professionals attending CME, either directly to the individuals
attending the conference or indirectly to the conference’s
sponsor. Similarly funding should not be offered to compensate
for the time spent by healthcare professionals attending the
conference or meeting.
16
ACCME Standard:
Independence
• Identification of CME needs;
• Determination of educational objectives;
• Selection and presentation of content;
• Selection of all persons and organizations that will be in
a position to control the content of the CME;
• Selection of educational methods;
• Evaluation of the activity.
A CME provider must ensure that the following decisions were made
free of the control of a manufacturer.
A manufacturer cannot take the role of non-accredited partner in a
joint sponsorship relationship.
EXHIBIT C
32 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
17
ACCME Standard: Appropriate
Use of Manufacturer Support
The CME provider must make all decisions regarding the
disposition and disbursement of manufacturer support.
A CME provider cannot be required by a manufacturer to
accept advice or services concerning teachers, authors, or
participants or other education matters, including content,
from a manufacturer as conditions of contributing funds or
services.
All manufacturer support associated with a CME activity must
be given with the full knowledge and approval of the CME
provider.
18
ACCME Standard:
Written Agreement
The agreement must include the CME provider, even if the support is given directly to the CME provider’s educational partner or a joint sponsor.
The written agreement must specify the manufacturer that is the source of commercial support.
Both the manufacturer and the CME provider must sign the written agreement between the manufacturer and the CME provider.
33CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
19
ACCME Standard: Appropriate Management of Associated
Commercial PromotionArrangements for commercial exhibits or advertisements cannot influence planning or interfere with the presentation, nor can they be a condition of the provision of commercial support for CME activities.
Product-promotion material or product-specific advertisement of any type is prohibited in or during CME activities. Live (staffed exhibits, presentations) or enduring (printed or electronic advertisements) promotional activities must be kept separate from CME.
Educational materials that are part of a CME activity, such as slides, abstracts and handouts, cannot contain any advertising, trade nameor a product-group message.
Print or electronic information distributed about the non-CME elements of a CME activity that are not directly related to the transfer of education to the learner, such as schedules and content descriptions, may include product-promotion material or product-specific advertisement.
A provider cannot use a commercial interest as the agent providing a CME activity to learners.
20
FDA Guidance: Relationship Between Provider and
Supporting Company
FDA will consider whether there are legal, business, or other
relationships between the manufacturer and the CME
provider that could place the manufacturer in a position
whereby it may exert influence over the content of the activity
(e.g., a provider that is owned by, or is not viable without the
support of, the company supporting the activity).
FDA will consider whether individuals employed by the CME
provider and involved in designing or conducting scientific or
educational activities are also involved in advising or
otherwise assisting the manufacturer with respect to sales or
marketing of the manufacturer’s product.
EXHIBIT C
34 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
21
FDA Guidance:
Written Agreement
One means of documenting the measures taken to
ensure independence of an activity is to have a written
agreement between the CME provider and the
supporting manufacturer. This document should reflect
that the CME provider will be solely responsible for
designing and conducting the activity, and that the
activity will be educational, nonpromotional, and free
from commercial bias. While not required, a written
agreement, coupled with the factors described above,
can provide valuable evidence as to whether an activity
is independent and nonpromotional.
22
CME Minefield #3:
Program Funding Decisions
• Departmental Approval
• Integrity of Decision Making
• Permissible / Impermissible Linkages
35CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
23
OIG Guidance:
Educational GrantsFunding that is conditioned, in whole or in part, on the purchase of product implicates the fraud and abuse statute, even if the educational or research purpose is legitimate.
To the extent the manufacturer has any influence over the substance of an educational program or the presenter, there is a risk that the educational program may be used for inappropriate marketing purposes.
To reduce the risks that a grant program is used improperly to induce or reward product purchases or to market product inappropriately, manufacturers should separate their grant making functions from their sales and marketing functions.
Manufacturers should establish objective criteria for making grants that do not take into account the volume or value of purchases made by, or anticipated from, the grant recipient and that serve to ensure
that the funded activities are bona fide.
24
PhRMA Code: Third-Party
Educational or Professional
Meetings
Any financial support should be given to the conference’s
sponsor which, in turn, can use the money to reduce the
overall conference registration fee for all attendees.
Financial support should not be offered for the costs of travel,
lodging, or other personal expenses of non-faculty healthcare
professionals attending CME or other third-party scientific or
educational conferences or professional meetings, either
directly to the individuals attending the conference or
indirectly to the conference’s sponsor. Similarly funding
should not be offered to compensate for the time spent by
healthcare professionals attending the conference or
meeting.
EXHIBIT C
36 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
25
CME Minefield #4:
Content / Program / Speaker
Reviews
• Internal Standards
• Guidance
• Scientific / Marketing Boundaries
26
OIG Guidance:
Education
To the extent the manufacturer has any influence over the
substance of an educational program or the presenter, there
is a risk that the educational program may be used for
inappropriate marketing purposes.
The manufacturer should have no control over the speaker or
content of the educational presentation.
Manufacturers should take steps to ensure that neither they,
nor their representatives, are using these activities to
channel improper remuneration to physicians or others in a
position to generate business for the manufacturer or to
influence or control the content of the program.
37CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
27
ACCME Standard: Resolution of
Personal Conflicts of Interest
The CME provider must be able to show that everyone who is
in a position to control the content of an education activity has
disclosed all relevant financial relationships with any
manufacturer to the CME provider.
The ACCME defines “relevant’ financial relationships” as
financial relationships in any amount occurring within the past
12 months that create a conflict of interest.
An individual who refuses to disclose relevant financial
relationships will be disqualified
The CME provider must have implemented a mechanism to
identify and resolve all conflicts of interest prior to the
education activity being delivered to learners.
28
ACCME Standard: Use of
Commercial Support
A CME provider cannot be required by a
manufacturer to accept advice or services
concerning teachers, authors, or participants or
other education matters, including content, from a
manufacturer as conditions of contributing funds or
services.
All manufacturer support associated with a CME
activity must be given with the full knowledge and
approval of the CME provider.
EXHIBIT C
38 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
29
ACCME Standard: Expenditures for an individual providing CME
The CME provider must have written policies and procedures governing honoraria and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses for planners, teachers and authors.
The CME provider, the joint sponsor, or designated educational partner must pay directly any teacher or author honoraria or reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in compliance with the CME provider’s written policies and procedures.
If teachers or authors are listed on the agenda as facilitating or conducting a presentation or session, but participate in the remainder of an educational event as a learner, their expenses can be reimbursed and honoraria can be paid for their teacher or author role only.
30
ACCME Standard: Content and
Format without Commercial Bias
The content or format of a CME activity or its related materials must promote improvements or quality in healthcare and not a specific proprietary business interest of a manufacturer.
Presentations must give a balanced view of therapeutic options. If the CME educational material or content includes trade names, where available trade names from several companies should be used, not just trade names from a single company.
39CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
31
FDA Guidance:
Independence
In determining whether an activity is independent of the
substantive influence of a manufacturer, FDA examines
whether and to what extent the manufacturer is in a position
to influence the presentation of information related to its
products or otherwise transform an ostensibly independent
program into a promotional vehicle.
FDA is concerned that manufacturers may influence the
content of educational programs both directly and indirectly.
Directly, by being involved in the selection of speakers or in
the treatment of topics. Indirectly, through the nature of the
relationship between the manufacturer and the CME
provider.
32
FDA Guidance: Content and Selection of
Presenters and Moderators
FDA will consider whether the CME provider has maintained
full control over the content of the program, planning of the
program’s content, and over the selection of speakers and
moderators.
FDA will look at whether the manufacturer has engaged in
scripting, targeting points for emphasis, or other actions
designed to influence the program’s content. FDA will
consider if the manufacturer has suggested speakers who
are or were actively involved in promoting the manufacturer’s
products or who have been the subject of complaints or
objections with regard to presentations that were viewed as
misleading or biased in favor of the manufacturer’s products.
EXHIBIT C
40 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
33
FDA Guidance: The Focus
of the ProgramFDA will consider whether the intent of the manufacturer and the
CME provider is to produce an independent and nonpromotional
activity that is focused on educational content and free from
commercial influence or bias. FDA will also consider whether the
title of the activity fairly and accurately represents the scope of
the presentation.
FDA also will look at the focus of the activity to determine if the
central theme is based on a single product marketed by the
manufacturer or a competing product, except when existing
treatment options are so limited as to preclude any meaningful
discussion of alternative therapies. Emphasis on a newer or, in
the view of the presenter, more beneficial treatment modality
should be provided in the context of a discussion of all
reasonable and relevant options.
34
FDA Guidance: Audience SelectionFDA will consider whether invitations or mailing lists for supported
activities are generated by the sales or marketing departments of the
manufacturer, or are intended to reflect sales or marketing goals (e.g., to
reward high prescribers of the company’s products, or to influence
“opinion leaders”).
In the case of a live presentation, FDA will consider whether there was
an opportunity for meaningful discussion or questioning provided during
the program.
FDA will consider whether information about the manufacturer’s product
presented in the scientific or educational activity is further disseminated
after the initial program, by or at the behest of the manufacturer, other
than in response to an unsolicited request or through an independent
provider.
FDA will consider whether there are promotional activities, such as
presentations by sales representatives or promotional exhibits, taking
place in the meeting room.
41CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
35
CME Minefield #5:
Locations
• Resorts
• Cruise Ships
• Non-resort locations
• Appearances
36
OIG Guidance: Relationships with
Physicians and Other Persons
Any time a pharmaceutical manufacturer provides anything of
value to a physician who might prescribe the manufacturer’s
product, the manufacturer should examine whether it is
providing a valuable tangible benefit to the physician with the
intent to induce or reward referrals.
If goods or services provided by the manufacturer eliminate
an expense that the physician would have otherwise incurred
(i.e., have independent value to the physician), or if items or
services are sold to a physician at less than their fair market
value, the arrangement may be problematic if the
arrangement is tied directly or indirectly to the generation of
federal health care program business for the manufacturer.
EXHIBIT C
42 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
37
PhRMA Code: Third-Party
Educational or Professional
Meetings
A conference or meeting shall mean any activity
held at an appropriate location, where (a) the
gathering is primarily dedicated, in both time and
effort, to promoting objective scientific and
educational activities and discourse (one or more
educational presentations(s) should be the highlight
of the gathering), and (b) the main incentive for
bringing attendees together is to further their
knowledge on the topic(s) being presented.
38
CME Minefield #6:
Meals
• Types
• Linkage
• Guests
• Funding
43CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
39
OIG Guidance: Relationships
with Physicians and Other
Persons
Any time a pharmaceutical manufacturer provides anything of value to a physician who might prescribe the manufacturer’s product, the manufacturer should examine whether it is providing a valuable tangible benefit to the physician with the intent to induce or reward referrals.
40
PhRMA Code: Meals
Financial support for meals or receptions maybe
provided to the CME sponsors who in turn can provide
meals or receptions for all attendees. A company also
may provide meals or receptions directly at such
events if it complies with the sponsoring organization’s
guidelines. In either of the above situations, the meals
or receptions should be modest and be conducive to
discussion among faculty and attendees, and the
amount of time at the meals or receptions should be
clearly subordinate to the amount of time spent at the
educational activities of the meeting.
EXHIBIT C
44 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
41
ACCME Standard:
Expenditures for learners
Social events or meals at CME activities cannot
compete with or take precedence over the educational
events.
The provider may not use commercial support to pay
for travel, lodging, honoraria, or personal expenses for
non-teacher or non-author participants of a CME
activity. The provider may use commercial support to
pay for travel, lodging, honoraria, or personal expenses
for bona fide employees and volunteers of the provider,
joint sponsor or educational partner.
42
CME Minefield #7:
Alliances
• Institutions
• Education Partners
• Standards / Monitoring
45CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
43
OIG Guidance: Education
Manufacturers should take steps to ensure that
neither they, nor their representatives, are using
these activities to channel improper
remuneration to physicians or others in a position
to generate business for the manufacturer or to
influence or control the content of the program.
44
ACCME Standard:
Independence
• Identification of CME needs;
• Determination of educational objectives;
• Selection and presentation of content;
• Selection of all persons and organizations that will be in
a position to control the content of the CME;
• Selection of educational methods;
• Evaluation of the activity.
A CME provider must ensure that the following decisions were made
free of the control of a commercial interest.
A commercial interest cannot take the role of non-accredited partner in
a joint sponsorship relationship.
EXHIBIT C
46 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
45
CME Minefield #8:
Non-CME Medical - Education
• Is it alive?
• What standards / restrictions
46
FDA Guidance:
A company-supported educational activity or part
thereof that does not relate to the company’s
products or a competing product, or suggest a use
for the company’s products, would not be
considered a promotional activity under FDA
guidance.
47CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
47
CME Minefield #9:
Grants
• Product ties
• Specific or General
• Commitments
48
OIG Guidance:
Educational Grants
Funding that is conditioned, in whole or in part, on the purchase
of product implicates the fraud and abuse statute, even if the
educational or research purpose is legitimate.
Manufacturers should separate their grant making functions from
their sales and marketing functions.
Manufacturers should establish objective criteria for making
grants that do not take into account the volume or value of
purchases made by, or anticipated from, the grant recipient and
that serve to ensure that the funded activities are bona fide.
When evaluating educational or research grants provided by
manufacturers to physicians, manufacturers should determine if
the funding is based, in any way, expressly or implicitly, on the
physician’s referral of the manufacturer’s product.
48 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
EXHIBIT C
49
PhRMA Code: Scholarships and
Educational Funds
Financial assistance for scholarships or other educational
funds to permit medical students, residents, fellows, and
other healthcare professionals in training to attend carefully
selected educational conferences may be offered so long as
the selection of individuals who will receive the funds is
made by the academic or training institution.
“Carefully selected educational conferences” are generally
defined as the major educational, scientific, or policy-making
meetings of national, regional, or specialty medical
associations.
Resources
RESOURCES
50 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
The following articles appeared in the last year since July 2005 in the DAILY
newsletter ePharm5. To request a free trial or for more details on our coverage,
please call ePharmaceuticals at 877/437-4276 or e-mail [email protected]
New site for neurologists offers free CME, news, peer discussion
A new Web site developed by neurologists for neurologists launched last week with freeevidenced-based CME courses and other content. The site, from neurology education networkIssues in Neurology, will offer Web-based CME courses presented by recognized neurologyexperts, as well as information about other live educational events that are offered through the network. The site includes updated neurology news, information about upcoming events, anddiscussion boards where members can interact with peers and thought leaders. Issues inNeurology is sponsored by Scienta Healthcare, an ACCME-accredited provider. The site waslaunched in conjunction with the American Headache Society's annual meeting in Los Angeleslast week.
MedsiteCME adds animated video to eCME site
MedsiteCME has added multimedia in the form of animated videos to its online CME casestudies, the company reports. The addition of multimedia to the case-based CME programsallows physicians to view and interact with patient videos, diagnostic imaging, and animated mechanisms. The video makes it easier for physicians to visualize procedures and anatomy in an interactive manner, Medsite says. MedsiteCME maintains more than 450,000 physicians in itsdatabase and is supported by unrestricted educational grants from more than 20 pharmacompanies. An example of three neurology cases with multimedia can be found at MedSiteCME.Earlier this month, The New England Journal of Medicine added to its Web site peer-reviewededucational videos that aim to teach procedures and specialized physical examinations(ePharm5, 4/17/06).
GSK-sponsored CME site teaches docs about human papillomavirus
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is sponsoring a new online CME resource for healthcare professionalsabout human papillomavirus (HPV) while it awaits FDA approval for its HPV vaccine, Cervarix.The site, HPVResource.org, provides peer-reviewed journal articles, interactive conferences withHPV and cervical cancer opinion leaders, and downloadable podcasts of medical presentations.The site also includes a three-dimensional, animated view of HPV disease progression. Userscan receive CME credit for participating. The site is also sponsored by the Postgraduate Institutefor Medicine and produced by medical education company M2 Communications, whose other clients include AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Wyeth. Last week an FDA advisory panel recommendedMerck's HPV vaccine, Gardasil, for approval. Merck is also running a TV and Web campaign toeducate consumers about cervical cancer, HPV, and Pap tests (ePharm5, 4/25/06).
Verispan survey: 87% of physicians earned eCME credits in 2005
Doctors' use of the Internet for health research, earning CME credits, and participating in onlineevents continues to grow, according to Verispan's 2005 ePromotion Annual Study. For example,87% of physicians said they earned eCME credits in 2005, compared to 81% in 2004, and 40% of
51CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
RESOURCES
doctors said they are earning more than one-fifth of their CME credits online. The survey ofapproximately 1,000 physicians across 14 specialties showed that 44% spend between one andthree hours online for health research during the average week, and 84% believe the Internet hasa positive impact on their knowledge of medical conditions and new products. As physicians' timeonline increases, so has pharma spending. According to the survey, pharmas spent $280 million to reach doctors online in 2005, a 27% increase from the year before.
New MedsiteCME Web site tools provide access to KOL roundtables
New features on MedsiteCME's Web site provide physicians with more in-depth disease resources and access to expert discussions in their fields. The new educational ResourceCenters give physicians information about specific diseases using e-newsletters, news feeds,treatment guidelines, conference calendars, interactive CME cases, and an Ask-the-Faculty tool.The Roundtables section publishes information and supporting monographs from key opinionleader roundtables. The site has also added teleconferencing, which allows physicians to dial inor go online to hear experts speak, according to MedsiteCME. Last summer, Medsite partnered with Yahoo! Health to bring physician-level drug information to consumers (ePharm5, 6/21/05).MedsiteCME, a division of Medsite, is supported by unrestricted educational grants from majorpharmas, including Pfizer, Wyeth, and Bayer.
Nearly 4,500 clinicians receive credits from AZ-sponsored online CME
Three months after completing an online and offline CME program about depression, cliniciansand primary care physicians (PCPs) are more frequently screening depressed patients for bipolar disorder, according to newly released outcomes data about the program. The eight-month,AstraZeneca-funded program from CME LLC (ePharm5, 5/25/05) provided online educationalactivities and CME credits to nearly 4,500 clinicians, Barbara Winkelman, vice president ofmarketing & multimedia for CME LLC, tells ePharm5. Online CME activities included archivedteleconferences, clinical puzzles, Q&A sessions about various treatment challenges, and anonline video program, she says. The program also helped identify future learning opportunities.For example, although the participating PCPs screened more often for bipolar disorder, theydidn't identify the recommended Mood Disorder Questionnaire as the tool that should be used,says Winkelman.
Web site helps physicians empower patients, includes eCME
A new Web site aims to help healthcare providers engage patients in actively managing their own health. The site, from managed-care company ValueOptions, gives clinicians in its networkaccess to clinical content, including nearly 4,000 articles about more than 200 health topics.Clinicians can also access news, professional treatment guidelines, screening tools, and CMEopportunities, according to the site. Doctors have the option of printing out material from the siteto share with patients or directing patients to the site so they can access the recommended resources themselves. The site is also available in Spanish.
Pharma sponsorship opportunities available on MedPage Today site
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, and AstraZeneca are among the pharmasadvertising on MedPage Today's online coverage of medical meetings, according to the site.MedPage Today is offering pharmas the chance to provide educational grants to fund coverageof medical meetings and same-day CME accreditation, according to the company. The coverageincludes live reporting from medical meetings and video interviews with key opinion leaders. InSeptember, the site, which reaches more than 300,000 U.S. physicians, added the Fingertip Formulary Online, a tool containing formulary information for virtually all U.S. health plans
RESOURCES
52 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
(ePharm5, 9/16/05). Search for "MedPage Today" on ePharm InDepth and to read all of our pastMedPage Today coverage.
Mediwire launches Part D network, CME platform
Mediwire Network, a syndicated online content network for physicians, has added new features toits network of more than 110 Web sites, including a Medicare Part D network and a CMEplatform, according to the company. The network has also added medical association partnerssuch as the Los Angeles County Medical Association, the American Medical Group Association,the Nebraska Medical Association, and the Southern Medical Association. Mediwire also saysthat pharmas can use its awareness-creation programs to position accredited and non-accreditedphysician education and on-label content. Mediwire was launched in April by Advanstar(ePharm5, 4/8/05) and now reaches more than half a million unique users.
New e-CME program can be customized to pharma
Medical marketing firm Lathian has launched an e-CME program that can recruit physicians, trackparticipation, and be branded to the sponsoring pharma, according to the company. Lathian canrecruit e-CME participants from its database, and then aggregate data about any single e-CMEprogram, such as how much time participants spent in a session, market survey responses, andrequests for information after the program. The e-CME program uses interactive multimedia toolssuch as streaming video and audio and graphics. During the sessions, which are typically 30-60 minutes long, participants can also click links to see a glossary of terms, learn more on a topicalWeb site, or talk to an expert via a live chat, according to the Web site. Go to Lathian.com tolearn more and to see an e-CME demo.
Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics adds eCME to education Web site
Johnson & Johnson company Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics has added online continuing medicaleducation courses and credits on its educational Web site, Ortho-wire.com, according to thecompany. The site for transfusion medical professionals allows users to take certain coursesonline instead of via distance learning programs that require travel or sending educationalmaterials by mail. The accredited courses include materials that vary in level of difficulty and usemultimedia and interactive learning tools, according to the site, which was launched earlier thisyear. Ortho-wire.com also includes an educational learning assessment tool; an ask the expertsection, which was added in September; and a learning library with additional articles. A surveylast month showed that nearly two out of three doctors believe that educational grants frompharma have a positive effect on CME (ePharm5, 9/23/05).
eCME gains ground, docs OK with pharma funding
Despite concerns to the contrary, 92% of doctors say pharmaceutical sponsorship of CMEactivities has no influence on their decision to participate, according to the annual Physician CMEInsight Study from Pri-Med. In fact, nearly two out of three doctors believe that educational grantsfrom pharma have a positive effect on CME. In addition, 45% of doctors said the opportunity toget specific product information plays a part in their CME selection. The survey also showed thatonline CME continues to grow. Although live forums are still the most popular, accounting for 56%of CME activity, about 12% of physicians' accredited CME hours are delivered online, up 50% inthe past two years. Fifty-three percent of surveyed physicians also say they plan to increase their use of e-CME in the next year. However, online courses are still considered more of asupplement to live forums, according to Pri-Med.
Mobile CME helps docs get education whenever, wherever
53CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
RESOURCES
Mobile CME applications should be short and punchy, easy-to-use, and provide information froma range of specialties, Bob MacAvoy, vice president of medical education for Epocrates, saidyesterday during the PMC presymposium. The courses should be about 15-30 minutes in lengthand typically consist of an educational article that doctors can read on their mobile devices, anelectronic post-test, and an e-mail certificate that is sent once the activity is successfullycompleted. These short activities, which are archived for a year, cater to a doctor's busy life. "Thefuture of CME is really helping it fit into a doctor's schedule," he said. Although 85% of doctorssurveyed by Epocrates said they would like a mobile CME option, the majority also said theywould be unwilling to pay for it, opening the door for grants and sponsorships from pharma,educational institutions, and other stakeholders.
Use problem-based learning to engage docs in CME
Using problem-based learning methods is key for CME programs to affect positive change inphysician behavior and patient outcomes, Ray A. Wolf, PharmD, senior manager of nationaleducation & strategy at Sanofi-Aventis, said yesterday during the PMC presymposium. Problem-based learning uses real-world situations that physicians can relate to and is more outcome-related. Because physicians can apply classroom situations to their own patients, practice, and experience, problem-based learning promotes deeper understanding, Wolf said. It also creates a more stimulating learning environment, which not only engages the physicians, but promotescollaboration with colleagues and instructors. This method improves motivation and knowledgeretention among physicians, Wolf added, emphasizing the importance of active participation.
Survey: Convenience, access drive docs' e-CME use
More than 70% of primary care physicians (PCP) who use e-CME say convenience and "anytimeaccess" are the top usage drivers, according to a survey from CME provider Pri-Med. More than40% say they use e-CME Web sites to search for specific information about conditions theirpatients have, and another 40% say they use e-CME Web sites to follow up on information theyreceived during a live event. Nearly two out of three PCPs use the Internet every day to findclinical or professional information, while 17% say the Web is their preferred source for CME--a 70% increase from 2003. Two-thirds of PCPs have participated in e-CME in the past year, and nearly half say they plan to increase their participation in the next year. Other popular onlinedestinations for PCPs are Web sites designed specially for doctors and sites that provide links toclinical resources, says Pri-Med.
Medscape to provide e-CME, online coverage for AIDS conference
Medscape, WebMD's physician portal, will be the source of online CME for the International AIDSSociety's (IAS) Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, according to a report fromWebMD. Medscape will develop the e-CME activities based on the data and scientificdevelopments presented during the conference and will post them on the Medscape Web sitewithin four weeks of the end of the conference. Medscape will also provide exclusive online access to IAS scientific discussions and forums, including daily news reporting, physiciancommentary, and interviews with AIDS researchers about conference findings, according toWebMD. The third annual conference will be held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on July 24-27.Conference sponsors include several major pharmas, such as Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Roche.
Forrester: Medscape most popular online destination for docs
Ninety-two percent of physicians have visited Web sites for clinical information, according to anew study from Forrester Research. The survey of 1,331 U.S. doctors shows that Medscape,WebMD's physician portal, is the most popular online destination, with 71% of physicians
RESOURCES
54 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
reporting they've visited it. The survey also found that doctors use the Web to research drug information more than any other clinical topic, and many doctors use pharma-sponsored sitessuch as MerckMedicus (32%) and MDLinx (17%). Links to a broad range of medical information,access to the latest evidence-based clinical guidelines, and e-CME opportunities are the biggestvalue-adders to clinical sites, according to the study. Doctors also say established brands andapproval or endorsement from professional organizations lend credibility to Web sites. For a copyof the full report, go to forrester.com.
These articles appeared in the last year since July 2005 in the DAILY newsletter
ePharm5. To request a free trial or for more details on our coverage, please call
ePharmaceuticals at 877/437-4276 or e-mail [email protected]
55CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
RESOURCES
Do your sales reps understand compliance risks?
The pharmaceutical industry widely recognizes continuing medical education (CME) as
an effective and necessary way to keep healthcare providers up to date on clinical
developments. However, with increased scrutiny and regulation from the likes of the
Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical
Education (ACCME), pharmaceutical companies and their sales representatives walk a
fine line with regard to providing financial support for CME activities.
The CME Online Training for Pharmaceutical Sales Reps—which includes a quiz,
answer key, and certificate of completion—will help sales reps understand CME's
importance to physicians and other healthcare providers, as well as the legal issues that
affect a pharmaceutical company's support for CME.
This interactive training gives you an overview of the two primary forms of CME
activity; provides in-depth reviews of the organizations with major roles in CME,
including the FDA, PhRMA, and the OIG; and discusses the relationship between CME
accreditation and the ACCME.
Use this CME Online Training to:
• Raise understanding of personal and professional risks of non-compliant behavior
• Establish a training process that is scalable and easily managed and maintained
• Demonstrate company-wide commitment to compliance ‘from the top down’
• Customize modules to reflect your “Code of Conduct” or specific SOP
CONTACT US
For more information on ePharmaceuticals Online Compliance Training call our
Customer Service Team at 877/437-4276 or e-mail [email protected].
RESOURCES
56 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
CME Training Handbook For Pharmaceutical Sales Reps
To request a free sample, or for information on bulk or custom orders, please call ePharmaceuticals at 877/437-4276 or e-mail [email protected]
The CME Training Handbook for Pharmaceutical Sales Reps—which includes a quiz, answer key, andcertificate of completion—will help sales reps understand CME's importance to physicians and otherhealthcare providers, as well as the legal issues that affect a pharmaceutical company's support for CME.
HANDBOOK CONTENT
1. Introduction2. What is CME?
o Types of CME3. Organizations with major roles in CME
o The FDAo PhRMA o The OIG
4. CME accreditation and the ACCMEo CME trendso ACCME's interventiono The ACCME Standardso Standard 1: Independenceo Standard 2: Resolution of personal conflicts of interesto Standard 3: Appropriate use of commercial supporto Standard 4: Appropriate management of associated commercial promotionso Standard 5: Content and format without commercial biaso Standard 6: Disclosures relevant to potential commercial bias
5. Lessons learned6. Frequently asked questions
7. Final exam
To request a free sample, or for information on bulk or custom orders, please call
ePharmaceuticals at 877/437-4276 or e-mail [email protected].
OUR TEAM YOURSTOFROM
SAVE20%ON YOUR NEXT ORDER
This is how we say “Thanks!”Thanks for being an integral part of today's audioconference. Participation, questions, and follow-up com-ments from you and your peers help HCPro continue to develop quality audioconference programs youcan use to train staff, improve internal processes, and meet regulatory demands.
This is how we show our thanksVisit us online at www.hcmarketplace.com and redeem this coupon for 20% off any one item of yourchoice. You may select today's audioconference sponsor product, any newsletter, book, video, package ofhandbooks, or perhaps your next audioconference. If you prefer, call our Customer Service Team at800/650-6787 and mention Source Code MAUDIO20, or complete the order form below and fax it to800/639-8511. The choice is yours. The pleasure is ours.
While you're at the Marketplace, sign up for any of dozens of free weekly e-zines. It's fast and it's easy!
*Shipping-Newsletter shipping $24/year, $27 to AK, HI, PR; Books and Videos $10 on orders under $100, $18 on orders over $100;Handbooks $5 pack, $15 pack to AK, HI, PR
**Tax Information-States that tax products and shipping and handling: CA, CT, GA, IL, FL, IN, KY, MA, MD, MI, NC, NJ, NY, OH,OK, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, VT, WA, WI; States that tax products only: AZ
HCPro | 200 Hoods Lane | P.O. Box 1168 | Marblehead, MA. 01945Phone 800/650-6787 | Fax 800/639-8511
Product Price Code Quantity Total
Order online at www.hcmarketplace.com
Enter your source code at checkout to save 20%! Your order is covered by HCPro’s risk-free, money-back guarantee.
TTHHIISS OOFFFFEERR EEXXPPIIRREESS IINN 3300 DDAAYYSS..
*Shipping(see below)
**Your state salestax
$
Your source code is: MAUDIO20Grand Total $
Ship to: (Shipments cannot be made to a P.O. Box)
Your Name and Title
Organization
Street Address
City/State/Zip
FOUR EASY WAYS TO PAY! (Please check one)
� � Bill me � Charge � VISA � MasterCard � AmEX � � Check enclosed (pay to HCPro) �� Bill my
facility with P.O. #
Account # ___________________________________________ Expires ___________________________________
Signature: ________________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you for your order! www.hcmarketplace.com
RESOURCES
58 CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
Speaker resourcesKeith KorenchukMcGuire Woods, LLPWashington Square1050 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 1200Washington, DC 20036-5317E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 202/857-1749
Christopher KingCME SolutionsP.O. Box 68680Tucson, AZ 85737E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 520/818-3037
John DeHartCME SolutionsP.O. Box 68680Tucson, AZ 85737E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 520/544-2938
Barbara A. Fuchs, MSAWyeth Pharmeceuticals500 Arcola Rd. F4320Collegeville, PA 19426E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 484/865-5021
HCPro sites
HCPro: www.hcpro.comIt is HCPro’s mission to meet the specialized information, advisory, and education needs of the healthcareindustry and learn from and respond to our customers with services that meet or exceed the quality theyexpect. Visit HCPro’s Web site at www.hcpro.com and take advantage of our new Internet resources. At hcpro.com, you will find
• the latest news, advice, and “how-to” information in the world of healthcare. • resourceful FREE e-mail newsletters covering everything from survey preparation and JCAHO standards
to healthcare credentialing and health information management. Sign up for weekly e-mail updates sentright to your computer.
• your healthcare questions answered by HCPro’s experts.• weekly tips on how to perform your job at your best.• in-depth “how-to” stories in our premium newsletters, including Briefings on JCAHO, Medical Staff
Briefing, and the Credentialing Resource Center (paid subscriptions or pay-per-view required to read
59CME vs. Promotion: Understanding MedEd Compliance
RESOURCES
premium newsletter content).• the most comprehensive products and services (through our online store) to help you tackle the tough
issues that you face on the job every day.• all of the information and resources you need in the following healthcare areas:
- Accreditation- Case management- Corporate compliance- Credentialing/privileging- Executive leadership- Finance- Health information management- Infection control- Long-term care- Marketing- Medical staff- Nursing- Pharmacy- Pharmaceutical- Physician practice- Quality/patient safety- Rehab - Residency - Safety
HCPro continues to offer the expert advice and practical guidance you’ve come to rely on to meet your dailychallenges. This valuable information will be available to you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week via the Internet.
The Greeley Company, A Division of HCPro: www.greely.comGet connected with leading healthcare consultants and educators at The Greeley Company’s Web site atwww.greeley.com. This online service provides the fastest, most convenient, and most up-to-date informationabout our quality consulting and national training offerings to healthcare leaders. Visitors will find a completelisting of all of our products and services, including consulting services, seminars and conferences, and linksto other HCPro offerings.
Here’s what visitors will find:• Detailed descriptions of all The Greeley Company’s consulting services• Catalog and calendar of Greeley’s national seminars and conferences and available CME’s• Faculty and consultant biographies—learn about our senior level clinicians, administrators, and faculty
who are ready to assist your organization with your consulting needs and seminars• “Ask the expert” Q&A• A list of Greeley clients• A link to free email newsletters
HCPro’s Healthcare Marketplace: www.hcmarketplace.comLooking for even more resources? You can shop for the healthcare management tools you need at HCPro’sHealthcare Marketplace at www.hcmarketplace.com. Our online store makes it easy for you to find what youneed, when you need it, in one secure and user-friendly e-commerce site.
At HCPro’s Healthcare Marketplace you’ll discover all of the newsletters, books, videos, audioconferences,online learning, special reports, and training handbooks that HCPro has to offer. Shopping is secure and pur-chasing is easy with a speedy checkout process.
CER
TIFI
CA
TEO
FA
TTEN
DA
NC
E
atte
nded
“CM
E vs
.Pro
mo
tion:
Und
ers
tand
ing
Me
dEd
Co
mp
lianc
e”
a 90
-min
ute
audi
ocon
fere
nce
on
Au
gu
st 8
, 2
00
6
Rob
Stu
art
Sen
ior
Vic
e P
resi
dent
/ C
hief
Ope
ratin
g O
ffice
r