75 YEARS FROMHARM TO HOME

Identify:Criteria for the IAWG Technologies Working Group to use in selecting priority RH service delivery gaps for technology fixesCharacteristics that make a technology appropriate for use in a crisis settingIdentify ways to facilitate field input into Working Group deliberations

1. For some identified RH gaps, technology may not be the answer

2. For some identified gaps, solutions may already exist, but are not widely utilized

3. For others, technology exists but may not be workable in a crisis setting

4. For still others, new technology may need to be developed

What makes technology appropriate for crisis settings?How should the IAWG Working Group decide which gaps to address? How can we garner input from frontline field workers into this process?

For example:PortabilityCostSimplicity of use…

Should we focus on increasing use of existing technology? Should we focus on tailoring current technology so it can work better in crisis settings? Should we focus on stimulating the development of new technological fixes for identified gaps?

What process should the Working Group follow to decide the way forward?Should we do the 3 technology fixes sequentially over time, starting with the “easy wins”, e.g., promote greater use of existing technologies?How can we garner input from frontline field workers into this discussion?

6 Groups, 2 per question Brainstorm ways to answer the questions

20 min separatelyThen combine groups working on the same question for 30 min together to consolidatePrepare flipchart, list participants of both groups, list consolidated priority answers to the question

5 min per question report-back

Output: collated/refined lists.