6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup1DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark WP 2.6 Improved...
-
Upload
rory-anable -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of 6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup1DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark WP 2.6 Improved...
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup1 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
WP 2.6 Improved estimate sea ice fluxes and the freshwater cycle in the Arctic
D 2.6.1: Sea ice Thickness and SSH 2003-2008 based on ICESat – month 18
D 2.6.2: Ice volume flux through Fram Strait, Nares and Bering Strait based on ice thickness and drift - month 18
D 2.6.4 Computed time series of GRACE signals from freshwater flux pulses and compared to satellite data - month 36
D 2.6.3 Freshwater flux time series grids for the Arctic Ocean based on modelled Greenland fresh water output (WP 2.3), river discharge (WP 1.2) and sea ice flux and melt (WP 2.6) - month 18
MONTH 18 = end of August 2011
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup2 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
Sea ice freeboard heights
Sea ice freeboard heights and dynamic topography of the Arctic Ocean observed from ICESat altimetry 2003-2008 release 28 are available in grids of resolution 0.1°x0.2°
ICESat freeboard heights October 2005
blue: February – Marchgreen: October - November
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup3 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
Conversion of freeboard to thickness
Conversion of measured sea ice free-board heights (hf) into ice thicknesses (tice) depends on:
- Snowdepth- Density of the ice, water and snow
)()(
*)1(
swsiwi
ssii
fice
hh
hhR
hRt
Wadhams et al, 1992
Recent studies suggest to use a
R = 3 - 3.5
for conversion of ICESat freeboard heights into thicknesses. The study is based co-incident measurements of draft by AUV and freeboard by airborne laser
Doble et al. 2011, JGR SEDNA, submitted
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup4 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
First results of CryoSat-2
STINE results CryoSat-2
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup5 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
ESA CryoVEx 2011: underflight of CryoSat-2
Photo by Jóhannes Stefánsson
Credits: www.esa.int/esaLP/
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup6 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
CryoVEx 2011: DTU Space airborne activities
EGIG-line
Austfonna
Devon
Alert
Charter Norlandair Twin Otter: April 7 - May 10, 2011
April 7 – 8 Installation and test flight Kangerlussuaq
April 10 – 19 CryoVEx (sea ice program Alert)
April 20 – 25 PROMICE (Southern Greenland)
April 26 – May 6 CryoVEx (EGIG-line, Austfonna ice cap, sea ice work from RV Lance north of Svalbard, Devon ice cap)
May 7 – 8 Spare/Dismount of instruments
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup7 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
Noget om GRACE ... Indridi ?!?
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup8 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
WP 2.6: Status and questions
Lead beneficiary: DTU Space
D 2.6.1: Time series grids of sea ice thickness, and improved SSH measurements, 2003-2008 (for the 3-yearly laser periods), with comparisons to selected ocean models and field-calibrated satellite data
This deliverable is almost ready
Lead beneficiary: NERSC
D 2.6.2: Ice volume flux time series across the Fram Strait and other outlets (Bering Strait, Nares Strait) based on satellite data (2003-)
To solve this we need ice thicknesses and ice drift. DTU Space has the ice thickness fields from D 2.6.1, do NERSC have ice drift ? More important who will actually calculate the flux rates, DTU Space or NERSC ?
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup9 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark
WP 2.6: Status and questions - continued
Lead beneficiary: NERSC
D 2.6.3: Freshwater flux time series grids for the Arctic Ocean based on:
Modeled Greenland freshwater output
River discharge
sea ice flux
sea ice melt
Who will provide the modeled freshwater output from the Greenland ice sheet ?
Who will provide the river discharge ?
We already have the sea ice flux from D 2.6.2
Who will provide an estimate of the sea ice melt ? Is this provided from the model of University of Hamburg ?
Last but not the least we need to agree on data format and grid definitions.