6.1 Development of management options · K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT...
Transcript of 6.1 Development of management options · K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT...
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 37
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
6 STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT
6.1 Development of management options
6.1.1 Community suggestions
The community survey (refer Section 3.1) provided an opportunity for community members to offer
suggestions on how to achieve long-term sustainability of Hearnes Lake. More than 60 different
potential options were put forward within the questionnaires. The community overwhelmingly
suggested extensive controls on future development, ranging from total exclusion to the
establishment of vegetated buffers around the foreshores.
The community also consistently suggested improvements to access and facilities around the lake to
improve the public amenity of Hearnes Lake. For other issues, however, there were conflicting
suggestions from the community, particularly in regards to control and management of dogs, 4WD
access, artificial entrance opening, management of the old timber fishing cottages, and dredging
within the lake.
6.1.2 Short-listed options
In considering the objectives of the Estuary Management Plan and potential wider environmental
impacts, a short-list of potential future management options was established for further investigation
and assessment. These options were essentially derived from the community suggestions,
supplemented by additional input from the study team and the CEMAC.
These potential management options are documented below based on the primary implementation
mechanisms.
6.1.2.1 Planning, management and conservation of land
PMC-1. Acquire and preserve foreshore land.
As part of future lot redevelopment, acquire land around the Hearnes Lake foreshore that is
inappropriate for development and is considered necessary to protect the lake from development
impacts. This land should include, as a minimum, all lands within a 50 metre landward buffer of the
RL 3.5m AHD contour (refer Section 9.4)1. The acquired land should be rezoned to environmental
protection. This would require amendment to the existing Hearnes Lake Developer Contributions
Plan, or a Regional Contributions Plan.
Land within 50 metres of the RL 3.5m AHD contour is shown in Figure 6-1.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
PMC-2. Incorporate foreshore and coastal buffers into CCRP.
1 A 50m buffer from the 3.5m AHD contour will result in a much larger buffer (up to 200m) from the future MHW level within
the lake (assuming a 0.9m sea level rise), particularly around the southern portion of the lake.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 38
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Following acquisition of foreshore land as part of PMC-1, the foreshore buffer should be incorporated
into the Coffs Coast Regional Park to enable pro-active management by both Council and DECC.
The buffer along the coast as well as the existing Crown land dune between Hearnes Lake and Willis
Creek (which contain the gazetted SEPP-26 Littoral Rainforest) should also be incorporated to the
Coffs Coast Regional Park to provide connectivity of the park along the coast.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
Figure 6-1 Buffer from future development (50m from RL 3.5m AHD contour)
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 39
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-3. Prevent inappropriate vegetation removal.
Establish statutory planning requirements preventing removal of native vegetation throughout the
Hearnes Lake catchment, and especially around the foreshores. This should include clearing of
understorey, and excessive lopping or removal of individual trees that inhibit views. These
requirements should strengthen any existing Tree Preservation Orders and the provisions of the
Native Vegetation Act.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
PMC-4. Consider lake impacts in highway re-routing.
The RTA and Council should carefully consider the potential impacts on Hearnes Lake of any
upgrading to the Pacific Highway. In this regard, conditions should be imposed on future roadworks
that prevent detrimental environmental impacts, including modifications to hydrologic regimes,
sediment loads and pollutant contamination (including trace metals from road runoff). Any increase in
traffic as a result of road improvements would also increase the potential for spills, which may impact
on Hearnes Lake. It is suggested that all runoff from any new highway be treated prior to discharge
into environmentally sensitive areas, such as Hearnes Lake.
The proposed highway upgrading plans developed by the RTA are shown in Figure 6-2. These plans
show that the upgrade will essentially remain within the existing highway alignment in the vicinity of
Hearnes Lake with the inclusion of an overpass connecting Graham Drive to Hearnes Lake Road,
and a realigned western end of Hearnes Lake road as it connects to the local feeder road (refer
South Woolgoolga Interchange inset within Figure 6-2).
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
PMC-5. Conservation of privately owned vegetation.
Areas of significant native vegetation on privately owned land within the catchment should be
identified. Relevant landowners should then be encouraged, through provision of incentives, to
conserve these vegetated areas through formal conservation agreements with DECC, Council or
NRCMA, where consistent with native vegetation conservation priorities. Conservation agreements
should incorporate the re-establishment of a 50 metre vegetated buffer around the existing vegetation
stands to help reduce the impacts of edge effects. Significant privately owned vegetation in the
Hearnes Lake catchment is shown indicatively in Figure 6-3.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
PMC-6. Prevent artificial opening of lake entrance unless for exceptional circumstances.
Artificial modification of Hearnes Lake entrance through manual opening or similar should be
prohibited, except under an exceptional circumstance whereby there is a significant and scientifically
validated risk to human health or the environment that can be effectively abated through temporary
entrance modification. Such circumstances may include, for example, overflows from the sewerage
system, or a spill on the Pacific Highway. Artificial management of the entrance to control flooding
and foreshore inundation (including when inundated with natural marine debris) should be prohibited.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 40
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
Figure 6-2 Proposed Pacific Highway upgrade route (source: RTA, 2006)
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 41
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Figure 6-3 Significant private vegetation
PMC-7. Consider lake impacts in effluent reuse farm expansion.
An effluent reuse farm is currently in operation within the catchment, adjacent to Double Crossing
Creek. Prior to the expansion of this operation, a comprehensive assessment should be carried out
to ensure that it will not have any significant negative impact on the water quality and/or freshwater
inundation above background levels of Double Crossing Creek or Hearnes Lake and their foreshores,
and adjacent marine park systems. A cursory assessment carried out as part of the Estuary
Processes Study (WBM, 2006) suggested that the existing operation is not having a notable impact
on the water quality of receiving waters.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
PMC-8. Amend SEPP-14 to include estuarine vegetation communities of Hearnes Lake.
To recognise the regional importance of the Hearnes Lake wetlands area, the mapped estuarine
vegetation (as determined through recent DPI mapping as part of the CCA) should be included in
SEPP-14 Coastal Wetlands, which would require an amendment to SEPP-14. Of particular
importance are the extensive saltmarsh areas around the southern part of the lake, and the
mangroves and saltmarsh on the alluvial islands at the confluence of Double Crossing Creek.
Inclusion in SEPP-14 would significantly increase the conservation potential of these areas
(especially in regards to grazing, clearing and earthworks).
An area possibly suitable for inclusion in SEPP-14 is shown in Figure 6-4.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 42
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
Figure 6-4 Possible SEPP-14 Expansion Area at Hearnes Lake
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 43
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
6.1.2.2 Development controls
DC-1. Buffer lake from future development.
Future development should not be permitted to encroach too close to the lake foreshores and
tributaries. In order to maintain ecological integrity and accommodate future sea level rise, future
urban development should be set back at least 50 metres from the RL 3.5m AHD contour (refer
Section 9.4) (refer Figure 6-1). The buffer area between the lake and the development should be
revegetated, where necessary, and not used to provide essential urban services, such as stormwater
treatment, or used (cleared) to provide an asset protection zone for the future dwellings.
The need for a buffer between the lake and future development was advocated by a majority of
respondents to the questionnaire. The size of the buffer, however, varied from 50 metres to 1km.
Some respondents indicated that development should be permitted on the western side of the
highway only (with the eastern side preserved for environmental values), while others indicated that
no future development should be allowed within the catchment.
The Hearnes Lake / Sandy Beach DCP included a buffer around the lake of 50 metres from the RL
3.5m AHD, based on preliminary investigations carried out as part of the Hearnes Lake Estuary
Processes Study (refer Section 9.4). Draft LEP Amendment No. 29 has formalised this buffer by
rezoning the foreshore land to environmental protection, thus preventing its use for future urban
development.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
DC-2. Limit runoff and pollutant loads from future development
All future development within the Hearnes Lake catchment should incorporate a range of measures
aimed at reducing the volumetric runoff and pollutant loads that a generated from the development
and are directed to the lake. These measures should follow the basic principles of Water Sensitive
Urban Design and Integrated Water Cycle Management, and should incorporate a range of lot-based,
streetscape and end-of-line treatment measures and devices. End-of-line devices should be installed
prior to land development works to control sediment runoff during construction stages.
Targets for volumetric runoff and pollutant load reductions should be established on a development
by development basis, and should aim to achieve a net positive environmental outcome (ie lower
pollutant loading to the lake) compared to the existing conditions. Treatment of existing catchment
runoff (particularly existing urban runoff) can be considered by developers as a means to help
achieve a net positive environmental outcome for the lake.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
DC-3. Compensatory revegetation to offset future development
Any removal of native vegetation within the catchment associated with future development should be
offset by appropriate and sufficient compensatory revegetation. This revegetation should ideally
occur on the development lot. Compensatory revegetation outside the Hearnes Lake catchment
should not be permitted. The amount and type of revegetation required should be determined
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 44
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
scientifically, eg DECC Biometric and Threatened Species Assessment tools, with a minimum ratio of
2:1 (ie 2 units revegetated per 1 unit cleared).
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
DC-4. Revegetated private lands to be conserved
As a supplement to DC-3, all lands revegetated as part of compensatory works for future
development should be dedicated to conservation through appropriate agreements (with DECC,
Council and/or NRCMA) and relevant modifications to land titles. Once dedicated, such lands could
be free of rates charges, but should provide opportunity for appropriate public access and enjoyment.
Responsibility for maintenance would remain with the landowner unless negotiated otherwise as part
of the conservation agreement.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
DC-5. Limit population within feeder area
Hearnes Lake is an important recreational and social amenity to the existing local residents (including
residents that live outside the actual lake catchment, but are prepared to travel to the lake to enjoy its
values). The capacity of the lake to accommodate users is finite however. A significant increase in
the number of users of the lake would diminish its values. In particular, there would be increased
disturbance of ‘native plants and animals’, and reduced potential for ‘peace and tranquillity’ – these
being the two highest regarded values as determined through the community survey (refer Section
4.2.1).
Proposed populations associated with future developments should be considered carefully in light of
the potential increased demand on the lake for social and recreational amenity. This should be
applied to all proposed developments within a 5 km radius of Hearnes Lake, not just those within the
catchment itself, as it is likely that future residents will travel to take advantage of Hearnes Lake.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
DC-6. Developer contributions to recreational facilities and amenities
Future development will result in an increased demand on existing recreational facilities and
amenities around the lake. The increased usage of the lake will also impose an increased demand
for better access to the lake foreshore and along the lake shores.
Developers should be required to provide financial contributions to upgrading or improving
recreational facilities and amenities around Hearnes Lake. The actual amounts provided by
developers should be based on the population associated with individual developments, subject to
negotiations with Council.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
DC-7. Promote eco-friendly development.
Future developments within the catchment should be compassionate to the environmental sensitivity
of the area, with positive steps taken to foster a bond between future residents and the natural
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 45
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
environment (i.e. eco-friendly developments only), including appropriate fire, weed, agriculture and
wildlife management.
Similarly, developments that do not promote and accommodate the natural sensitivity of the
environment should be discouraged.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
6.1.2.3 Rehabilitation works
R-1. Connect caravan park to reticulated sewerage system.
A reticulated sewerage network has recently been established along the Coffs Coast northern
beaches. Colonial Surfside Caravan Park is not currently connected to the sewerage system.
Instead, sewage generated from the caravan park is treated on-site via settlement ponds and
infiltration.
To prevent leaching of sewage to Hearnes Lake, the effluent from the Caravan Park should be
diverted to the reticulated sewerage system via a connection to the trunk sewer mains.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
R-2. Audit on-site systems and upgrade as necessary
All on-site sewage systems within the Hearnes Lake catchment, and particularly those located close
to natural watercourses, should be critically appraised for efficiency and potential leaching to natural
waterways and drainage lines. All deficient systems should be replaced by the landholder, or
connected to the reticulated sewerage system if considered feasible.
Greywater reuse schemes should be encouraged through incentives, to minimise the total volume of
effluent discharged to the environment. For low-lying systems (< RL 3.5m AHD), then replacement
systems should involve storage tanks and periodic pump-out, or connection to the reticulated system.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
R-3. Appropriately manage existing and future sewerage system
A reticulated sewerage system located close to a natural waterway (and an ICOLL in particular)
introduces an element of risk in respect to system overflows and bypassing. Existing elements of the
sewerage system should be assessed for potential under-capacity (leading to overflows and
bypassing into Hearnes Lake), while all future components of the local sewerage system should be
adequately designed to minimise discharges to the environment.
Future components of the sewerage system should also be designed to accommodate future sea
level rise. In particular, sewage pumping stations and overflows should be located above a level of
RL 3.5m AHD if a design life of 100yrs or so is to be adopted.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 46
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
R-4. Treat stormwater runoff from Sandy Beach village and caravan park
Existing surface runoff from the Sandy Beach village as well as from hardstand areas around the
Colonial Surfside Caravan Park are directed to Hearnes Lake. This runoff should be intercepted and
reduced to minimise potential negative impacts to adjacent marine park ecosystems, and treated
prior to discharge to the waterway. Stormwater management options should aim to i) reduce the
quantity of volumetric runoff from infiltration and stormwater harvesting approaches (including
retrospective installation of rainwater tanks), and ii) reduce the concentrations of pollutants (sediment
and nutrients) within the runoff through sedimentation, filtration and biological uptake (including for
example, artificial wetlands, sediment traps and bio-retention swales).
Locations for stormwater treatment measures should consider the potential for future sea and lake
level rise within their nominated design lives.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
R-5. Catch sediment wash-off from driveways, road verges and car parks
There are a number of unsealed private and public roads, verges and carparks within the Hearnes
Lake catchment, including along Hearnes Lake Road. Runoff from these unsealed areas should be
captured and detained to allow sedimentation prior to discharge into the lake and natural waterways.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
R-6. Revegetation of foreshores and areas within catchment
Important areas within the Hearnes Lake catchment should be targeted for revegetation where
existing vegetation is sparse or absent. Such areas would include the foreshores of the lake
(extending up to at least 50 metres from the RL 3.5m AHD contour to accord with the future
development buffer recommendations – see Option DC-1 and Figure 6-1), as well as riparian zones
around Double Crossing Creek and other smaller tributaries. In addition, revegetation should target
areas that re-establish wildlife corridors between forested areas across the landscape.
Of particular importance is the revegetation and re-establishment of wildlife linkage between the
remnant littoral rainforest pockets along the northern foreshore of Hearnes Lake and the SEPP-26
Littoral Rainforest area behind coastal dunes to the north of the lake entrance. This revegetation
would involve works on currently privately owned land, and/or the removal of, and subsequent
revegetation around, the old timber fishing cottages located on Crown land to the immediate north of
the lake entrance along with revegetation of the existing carparking area (refer Figure 6-5).
It is acknowledged that the Northern Rivers CMA is already working with some private landholders to
remediate steep lands in the vicinity of Hearnes Lake through the Steep Lands Project, co-ordinated
through Coffs Harbour Regional Landcare. This project is aimed mainly at old or disused banana
lands. Rehabilitation of steep erodable lands will reduce potential for catchment erosion and thus
sediment infill of Hearnes Lake.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 47
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Figure 6-5 Proposed revegetation north of Hearnes Lake entrance
R-7. Rehabilitate former timber mill and other degraded lands
A disused timber mill is located adjacent to Double Crossing Creek, upstream of the Pacific Highway
crossing. It is expected that this land would be contaminated to some degree as a result of the
industrial chemical and production at the site in the past.
An environmental audit of the site should be carried out followed by appropriate rehabilitation. The
extent of site rehabilitation would depend on the degree of contamination. As a minimum, any
remaining stockpiles should be removed and the site fully revegetated and conserved.
Other areas of degraded land within the catchment, such as former banana plantations, should also
be rehabilitated in a similar manner.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
R-8. Remove environmental weeds and control pests
Bushland areas around Hearnes Lake and within the catchment should be maintained through the
removal of environmental weeds and the control of feral animals and other pests. In particular, bitou
bush and lantana on the eastern side of the lake threaten the value of these natural bushland areas.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 48
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
For bushland on public land, weed removal and pest control can be carried out by volunteer groups,
work for the dole programs, green corps, etc, under the co-ordination of Council. For bushland on
private lands, incentives should be offered to landholders for undertaking maintenance.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
R-9. Remove cattle from lake margins and fence across waterway
Cattle currently graze on private land surrounding the southern end of Hearnes Lake. Grazing
extends into the shallow lake margins, with trampling of saltmarsh and damage to mangrove
seedlings (refer Figure 6-6). A wire fence has been constructed across the southern end of the lake
to prevent cattle from moving off the private land. The fence actually extends across public land, with
grazing of mangroves seedlings on the public land behind the fenceline. The impact of grazing is
obvious when comparing the condition of mangrove seedlings from one side of the fence to the other.
Grazing within the shallow lake margins should be prevented, particularly on public land. As a
minimum, the fence across the waterway should be removed, and fencing along the actual property
boundary erected to prevent cattle migration onto public land. Ideally, all cattle should be removed
from the low-lying areas surrounding the lake. This could be achieved through incentives offered to
landholders.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
Figure 6-6 Impacts of cattle grazing on mangroves and saltmarsh
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 49
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
6.1.2.4 Amenity works and controls
A-1. Prepare and implement a foreshore access improvement plan
Hearnes Lake and its foreshores provide a significant amenity to the local population. Therefore,
significant effort should be given to developing a long-term plan to establishing an appropriate level of
access and recreation around the lake. This plan should cater for the expected significant increase in
demand on Hearnes Lake as an amenity once potential development is realised. Care should be
taken, however, to ensure that unfettered access to the lake does not degrade the habitats and
scenic amenity of the environment that makes the area attractive.
The Foreshore Access Improvement Plan should incorporate the following:
• Improving condition of existing walking tracks;
• Bank stabilisation where existing tracks are being threatened (especially along northern
foreshore);
• A formal walking / cycling track along public land in front of the Colonial Surfside Caravan Park;
• Removal of existing footbridge and construction of a more engineered boardwalk connecting the
proposed Caravan Park walkway to the northern foreshore walkway;
• Possible connection of foreshore tracks / cycleway with regional facilities (eg Coffs to
Woolgoolga cycleway);
• Formalisation of access tracks over coastal dunes
Any new access infrastructure would need to accommodate future sea and lake level rise within the
context of the proposed design life of the works.
The Plan should also be prepared to allow future amenity works to be implemented in a staged
manner as foreshore lands are returned to public ownership (as recommended by Strategy PMC-1).
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
A-2. Install and maintain additional picnic facilities and amenities
Many members of the community identified a lack of picnic facilities and public amenities around
Hearnes Lake, including picnic tables, barbeques, shelters and toilets. The need for facilities will
increase further as the local catchment population increases following future urban development.
Additional facilities and amenities should be erected around the lake to cater for the existing and
future demands on the lake. Of notable importance are waste bins. These bins would also need to
be serviced on a regular basis.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
A-3. Rationalise 4WD access to beach
Four wheel drive (4WD) vehicles can currently access the beach via a degraded and variable track
along the northern edge of Hearnes Lake entrance. The issue of 4WD access to the beach along this
track inspires community comments from both sides.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 50
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
4WD access to the beach is considered important, but this should not be at the expense of
environmental damage or endangering other users of the lake and foreshore. Given the dynamic
nature of the lake entrance area, vehicles sometimes drive through part of the entrance channel to
access the beach.
It is proposed that 4WD access to the beach be considered in light of a more regional strategy for
vehicular beach access. Ideally, and in the long term, alternative vehicular beach access should be
provided.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
Figure 6-7 4WD beach access at Hearnes Lake entrance
A-4. Rationalise dog exercising areas on beach
Both on-leash and off-leash dog exercising is carried out along the beach in front of Hearnes Lake.
Again this issue has inspired considerable debate and comment by the community as part of the
survey, with both calls for tighter restrictions and for no restrictions. Justification for tighter restrictions
has been based on i) the disturbance to wildlife, and birds in particular, ii) the non-removal of faeces
from the beach, thus diminishing the enjoyment of other beach users, and iii) the lack of control over
animals.
It is recommended that dog owners be strongly encouraged to control animals and clean up all
faeces from the beach area. Some bins and bag stations are already provided at main entry points to
beach, however, these can be made more obvious. It is recommended that an ‘on-leash’ only area
be established within 500 metres of the lake entrance, extending up to Willis Creek and Flat Top
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 51
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Point. Provision of a designated off-leash section of the beach should be considered as part of a
more regional approach to dog-exercising, and should take into account the potential for disturbance
of native fauna and the loss of amenity for the general public. Any change to the permissibility of
dogs should be accompanied by immediate and periodic patrolling, and warnings / fines for non-
compliance.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
A-5. Discourage motorised vessels on the lake
The relatively small size of Hearnes Lake limits opportunity for boating. However, given its small size,
motorised boating within the lake has a larger potential for disturbance of wildlife, and detracting from
the natural setting of the environment.
Whilst it is not considered necessary to ban motorised boats from the lake, their use should be
discouraged through the lack of boat launching provisions and trailer parking. In contrast, carry-in
canoe launching facilities could be provided to encourage non-motorised vessel use.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
6.1.2.5 Heritage works and controls
H-1. Consider retention and restoration of a fishing cottage at lake entrance
A small number of old timber fishing cottages are located on Crown land to the immediate north of
Hearnes Lake entrance (refer Figure 6-8). Permissive Occupancy leases over these properties are
non-transferable, meaning that they are progressively relinquished as the lessees hand back rights or
die. Some cottages that were in poor condition have been demolished in recent years. It is
understood that there are approximately four cottages remaining on Crown land. The future of these
cottages is to be determined by the Department of Lands, and subject to the timeframes of natural
attrition.
The cottages are located in the middle of a narrow vegetated corridor between the lake and the
littoral rainforest to the north of the lake. Therefore, there would be significant environmental benefit if
the cottages were removed and the land rehabilitated to provide a continuous link of natural
vegetation. From a heritage perspective, however, one of the cottages could be retained and
restored. The heritage value of such a cottage would need to be balanced by the expected cost of
restoration and on-going maintenance (it may be subject to vandalism if not lived in permanently).
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 52
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Figure 6-8 Existing timber fishing cottages at lake entrance
6.1.2.6 Education
E-1. Raise awareness of habitat values of Hearnes Lake and importance of SIMP
Public awareness of the environmental values and importance of Hearnes Lake should be raised
through a targeted education campaign and on-going community consultation.
Community education for both permanent resident and temporary visitors to the area should focus on
nutrient reduction, vegetation management (including replacement of non-native with native
vegetation), domestic pet and companion animal management, species conservation, legal fishing
bag limits and size restrictions, and bushfire management.
The public education campaign should be supported by eco-educational signage appropriately
erected around the lake (maybe in concert with implementation of the foreshore access improvement
plan).
As Hearnes Lake is part of the Solitary Islands Marine Park, considerable effort should be made to
emphasise the significance of Hearnes Lake to the Marine Park, and the associated restrictions on
activities within Hearnes Lake as a result of the Marine Park zoning.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 53
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
E-2. Raise awareness of cultural values
Hearnes Lake offers considerable cultural values based on previous Aboriginal occupation and early
European activities. The cultural elements of Hearnes Lake and surrounding areas should be
promoted as part of a community education program, including appropriate signage around the area.
Promotion of cultural values could also be fostered through a schools education program, which may
dovetail an eco-educational program for Hearnes Lake.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
E-3. Raise awareness regarding the risks to users of the lake
Hearnes Lake receives bacterial inputs from catchment sources, particularly after rainfall. Whilst the
sources are to be addressed as part of this Plan, it is recommended that appropriate signage be
placed around the lake in areas of high recreational use advising of potential water quality risks.
Signage should suggest that swimming in Hearnes Lake should be avoided following rainfall
(although water quality data indicates that high bacterial levels are not restricted to rainfall events
only, refer WBM, 2006). Given the lack of permanent connection between the lake waters and the
ocean, Hearnes Lake is likely to be more susceptible to bacterial contamination that other estuaries,
with less potential for natural abatement of risk with time.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
E-4. Rural education program promoting best practice techniques for environmental
management
Existing agricultural areas within the catchment represent a significant potential for pollutant
generation. A targeted education program should be developed aimed at getting rural landholders to
adopt more environmentally-friendly agricultural practices. In particular, a rural education program
should target chemical use, sediment control (including from unsealed driveways), stock exclusion
and off-stream watering, effluent treatment and reuse, gully erosion stabilisation, and native
vegetation management.
Incentives should be used to encourage landholders to adopt better practice environmental
management techniques. Incentives should also be used to encourage additional revegetation of
privately owned lands, especially along creeklines and natural watercourses.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
E-5. Establish and support a community-based volunteer conservation group
The Hearnes Lake Coastcare Group has historically been involved in rehabilitating and revegetating
the northern foreshore of Hearnes Lake (refer Figure 6-9). The aim of this strategy is establish a
community-based volunteer group that would be able to assist in some of the on-ground works
recommended by this Plan, such as weed removal, revegetation and general foreshore clean-ups. In
doing so, the group would foster a greater appreciation of the natural environment by the residents of
Hearnes Lake.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 54
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Such a group would require formal management of volunteers and instructions to ensure works are
carried out appropriately and with appropriate financial and resource support by Council. The
previous Coastcare Group was managed by Coffs Harbour Council’s Landcare Support and
Development Officer (CHCC). The community group formed under this management strategy could
either be created as a separate group and would cover the entire Hearnes Lake area, or could
expand on the existing Hearnes Lake Coastcare Group.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
Figure 6-9 Current Coastcare rehabilitation plan for Hearnes Lake entrance area
E-6. Periodically distribute newsletter to residents regarding Estuary Management Plan
Many of the residents around Hearnes Lake are genuinely concerned and interested in the future of
the lake. Periodic newsletters should be distributed to interested community members regarding the
progress of the Estuary Management Plan. The newsletters, which should aim to be prepared
annually (and possibly distributed via rates notices or similar), should indicate what has been
achieved and completed during the previous 12 months, and what is proposed to be done in the
immediate future, by Council and other support agencies.
If there is little progress on the Plan, then an informed community may be able to lobby local Council
representatives to ensure that suitable funding and resources are allocated to the Plan in the future in
order to achieve the desired long-term objectives for Hearnes Lake.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 55
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
6.1.2.7 Monitoring
M-1. Monitor water quality for human health
Given its protected waters, Hearnes Lake is a popular location for swimming, kayaking and other
water-based recreational activities. The intermittent nature of the lake entrance, however, means that
the lake tends to accumulate pollutants, including pathogens and bacteria that are potentially harmful
to human health.
A program of regular water quality monitoring should be carried out in order to provide a better
indication of the suitability of the waters for primary contact recreation activities, such as swimming.
Council has collected water samples in Hearnes Lake on behalf of the Department of Environment
and Conservation (formerly EPA) Beachwatch Program in the past (data provided in the Hearnes
Lake Estuary Processes Study, WBM, 2006). The water quality monitoring program should target
indicators for the risks to human health, such as enterococci, faecal coliforms and/or faecal sterols.
Signage should be installed at key recreation areas of the lake informing the public of the risks
associated with primary contact activities. Signage should be based on the outcome of the
monitoring and updated periodically, as appropriate.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
M-2. Monitor water levels and water quality within the lake and tributaries for environmental
purposes
In addition to monitoring the water for human health reasons, water levels and water quality of
Hearnes Lake should also be periodically monitored and evaluated to improve our appreciation and
understanding of the environmental processes that occur within the lake, and to provide an indication
of the overall environmental health of the system.
There is relatively little scientific data on the condition of the waters within Hearnes Lake or the
tributaries that feed the lake. Water quality and water level data covering both the lake and the
tributaries can be used to determine the condition of the in-situ waters of the lake, as well as
determine the contribution of pollutants to the lake from the catchment. Improved knowledge on
pollutant sources and loads will improve opportunities for mitigation in the future.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
M-3. Periodically re-map aquatic vegetation around Hearnes Lake
On a periodic basis, the aquatic vegetation around Hearnes Lake should be mapped via detailed on-
ground survey and air photograph interpretation. Comparisons with previous vegetation maps can
provide an indication of trends in vegetation behaviour, particularly in relation to other environmental
variable, such as rainfall patterns, water levels, and water quality.
The Department of Primary Industries (Fisheries) have recently completed estuarine vegetation
mapping of Hearnes Lake as part of a state-wide Comprehensive Coastal Assessment (CCA)
Project. Re-mapping of the vegetation should be carried out every 5 years or so.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 56
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
M-4. Periodically monitor a range of biological indicators to help assess estuarine health
Whilst water quality can provide an initial indication of waterway condition, a range of biological
parameters also need to be considered when determining the overall health of an estuary. Therefore,
in order to provide a measure of estuarine health, and to gauge how this health is either improving or
declining in the future, it is necessary to monitor a range of biological indicators. Such indications
would include estuarine vegetation (extents and condition), algae, benthic fauna, mobile aquatic
fauna (fish, prawns etc), and avifauna (birds).
Monitoring of estuarine health will be important when evaluating the long-term effectiveness of this
Plan.
Timeframe: Medium term (3 – 5 years).
M-5. Periodically monitor the recreational use of Hearnes Lake and foreshore areas
The proposed development around Hearnes Lake is likely to result in an increase in recreational use
of the lake and foreshores. Monitoring of recreational use of Hearnes Lake should be carried out
before, during and after this development becomes realised to enable better management of the
demands placed on resources and facilities associated recreational activities around Hearnes Lake.
Monitoring of recreational use should also be carried out before and after any major investment into
amenities and facilities around Hearnes Lake in order to gain an appreciation for utilisation of the
resources by the general public.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
6.1.2.8 Administration and Enforcement
AE-1. Agencies to incorporate relevant EMP strategies into short and long term works and
investment programs
A successful Estuary Management Plan will only be achieved once all relevant agencies have made
substantial effort to carry out those tasks that they are responsible for. To ensure that agencies make
sufficient effort, it is important that the strategies outlined in this Plan are transferred across to the
individual short and long term works and investment programs of these agencies. This way, sufficient
funds and resources can be allocated to the actions as part of routine forward planning.
It is presumed that endorsement of this Plan by the relevant agencies indicates a willingness to assist
with implementation of the various strategies within the timeframes nominated by the Plan.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months).
AE-2. Increase enforcement of fishing and other environmental protection regulations
There are already a number of regulations associated with protecting the environment, ranging from
pollution control (including littering and sedimentation) to recreational fishing bag limits and sizes (and
taking of females with eggs etc). Given that Hearnes Lake is part of the Solitary Islands Marine Park,
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 57
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
extra effort should be provided in ensuring that its environment is not degraded from activities that are
already regulated.
This strategy involves increasing resources to enforce existing regulations aimed at protecting the
environment. Enforcement would be carried out by various agencies charged with responsibility for
different regulations. For example, Council is responsible for sediment and erosion control
associated with new development, while the Marine Parks Authority is responsible for enforcing
fishing and recreational activities within the MPA waters (including Hearnes Lake).
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years).
6.1.3 Strategies – Objectives Matrix
The short-listed options described above have been developed to address one or more of the specific
objectives for future management of Hearnes Lake (as established in Section 5.2). Table 6-1
provides a matrix of the short-listed options / strategies and the relevant objectives to which they
satisfy. Two ticks (��) within the matrix indicates that the option / strategy meets the objective
directly, whereas, one tick (�) indicates that the option / strategy only partially satisfies the objective,
or meets it in an indirect manner.
Table 6-1 shows that all objectives are satisfied by at least one option / strategy. Some objectives,
particularly Objectives 1, 2 and 11, are addressed by a large number of options / strategies, while
some strategies help to satisfy multiple objectives (especially strategies PMC-6, PMC-8, DC-1, DC-7,
R-1 and E-4).
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 58
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Table 6-1 Objectives and Options / Strategies Matrix
Management Objectives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Management Options
PMC-1 Acquire and preserve foreshore land �� � �
PMC-2 Incorporate foreshore land into CCRP � � ��
PMC-3 Prevent inappropriate vegetation removal �� � ��
PMC-4 Consider lake impacts in highway re-routing � � ��
PMC-5 Conservation of privately owned vegetation �� � �
PMC-6 Prevent artificial opening of lake entrance unless for exceptional circumstances � � �� �� �
PMC-7 Consider lake impacts in effluent reuse farm expansion � � ��
PMC-8 Amend SEPP-14 to include estuarine vegetation communities of Hearnes Lake �� � �� ��
DC-1 Buffer lake from future development �� � � � �� ��
DC-2 Limit runoff and pollutant loads from future development � � �� ��
DC-3 Compensatory revegetation to offset future development �� �� ��
DC-4 Revegetated private lands to be conserved � �� �
DC-5 Limit population within feeder area � �
DC-6 Developer contributions to recreational facilities and amenities ��
DC-7 Promote eco-friendly development � � � � �� �
R-1 Connect caravan park to reticulated sewerage system �� �� �� �
R-2 Audit on-site systems and upgrade as necessary �� �� ��
R-3 Appropriately manage existing and future sewerage system �� � �� �
R-4 Treat stormwater runoff from Sandy Beach village and caravan park � �� �� �
R-5 Catch sediment wash-off from driveways, road verges and car parks �� ��
R-6 Revegetation of foreshores and within catchment �� ��
R-7 Rehabilitate former Timber Mill and other degraded lands � �� ��
R-8 Remove environmental weeds and control pests �� �� ��
R-9 Remove cattle from lake margins and fence across waterway �� � �� �
A-1 Prepare and implement a foreshore access improvement plan � � � �� �
A-2 Install and maintain additional picnic facilities and amenities ��
A-3 Rationalise 4WD access to beach � � ��
A-4 Rationalise dog exercising areas on beach �� �� �
A-5 Discourage motorised vessels on the lake ��
H-1 Retain and restore one fishing cottage at lake entrance ��
E-1 Raise awareness of habitat values of Hearnes Lake and importance of SIMP � � � � ��
E-2 Raise awareness of cultural values ��
E-3 Raise awareness regarding the risks to users of the lake ��
E-4 Rural education program promoting best practice techniques for environmental management � � �� �� � ��
E-5 Establish and support a community-based volunteer conservation group �� � �� �
E-6 Periodically distribute newletter to residents regarding Estuary Management Plan ��
M-1 Monitor water quality for human health �� ��
M-2 Monitor water levels and water quality within the lake and tributaries for environmental purposes �� ��
M-3 Periodically re-map aquatic vegetation around Hearnes Lake �� ��
M-4 Periodically monitor a range of biological indicators to help assess estuarine health �� ��
M-5 Periodically monitor the recreational use of Hearnes Lake and foreshore areas �� ��
AE-1 Agencies to incorporate EMP strategies into short and long term works programs ��
AE-2 Increase enforcement of fishing and other environmental protection regulations �� �
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 59
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
6.2 Assessment and Prioritisation of Management Strategies
The short-listed options / strategies have been assessed and prioritised in order to provide a
proposed ranking for implementation. The greatest benefits to Hearnes Lake will be gained if the
most effective options are implemented first. A multi criteria decision making process has been
adopted to compare and prioritise the short listed management options.
Preferred management options have been determined by consideration of the following criteria:
1. Effectiveness of the option in addressing specific management objectives;
2. Acceptance of the option by community and stakeholders;
3. Cost of implementation of the option;
4. Number and priority of objectives that the option meets;
5. Requirements for completion of other management options;
6. Options should have a range of different implementation approaches; and
7. Options should have a range of different implementation timeframes.
For criteria No. 6, ‘different implementation approaches’ include:
• Administration and Enforcement;
• Education;
• Planning, Management and Conservation;
• Development Controls;
• Rehabilitation;
• Heritage;
• Amenity; and
• Monitoring
For criteria No. 7, the different timeframes considered, include:
• Immediately (12 – 18 months);
• Short Term (1 – 3 years); and
• Medium term (3 – 5 years).
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 60
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Much of the information used in the decision making process was obtained from the community and
stakeholders groups.
The preferred order of implementation basically represents the most efficient and effective approach
to management of the estuary from an outcomes viewpoint.
6.2.1 Results of the Multi Criteria Assessment
The results of the multi criteria assessment are shown in Appendix B.
Figure 6-10 shows a graphical representation of the relative score for the short-listed management
strategies. The scores presented in Figure 6-10 take into consideration the number of objectives
addressed by each option, the relative priority, or importance, of each objective addressed (refer
Section 5.3), the relative cost of implementation, and the relative effectiveness and acceptability of
the option.
Strategy prioritisation has been assigned the following levels:
• Critical: indicating that implementation of these particular strategies must take precedence over
other strategies within existing funding and resource limitations;
• Very High: indicating that these strategies are also very important and should take precedence
over lower order strategies;
• High: indicating that these strategies are still important, but implementation may be delayed in
preference for completion of critical and very high priority strategies;
• Medium: indicating that these strategies are not as important as the higher order strategies.
These strategies should still be implemented when funding and resources become available; and
• Low: indicating that these strategies have the least potential to make significant difference to the
Hearnes Lake environment. These strategies will, however, still benefit some aspects of
Hearnes Lake, and as such, should be implemented when funding and resources becomes
available, and once higher order strategies have been completed.
Strategy prioritisation is independent on the prescribed timeframes, as many strategies are not
required to be carried out until some time in the future (for example when proposed development
commences within the catchment, or upon completion of a preceding strategy).
6.2.2 Combining of Strategies
Following consultation with Coffs Harbour City Council, a number of strategies were combined and
consolidated in order to reduce the total number required for implementation. A summary of the
strategy consolidation is provided below:
• New WSUD strategy DC-2: Combining former DC-2, R-4 and R-5
• New Water Quality strategy M-1: Combining former M-1 and M-2
• New Vegetation strategy PMC-3: Combining PMC-3, DC-3 and DC-4
• New Recreation strategy A-1: Combining former A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5 and M-5
• New Amenity strategy A-2: Combining former A-2 and DC-6
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 61
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Figure 6-10 Relative prioritisation / scoring of short-listed strategies / options
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
DC-1
DC-2
PMC-6
PMC-8
PMC-1
DC-3
R-8
E-5
R-9
R-1
E-4
A-4
DC-4
PMC-4
PMC-7
E-1
R-5
R-2
R-6
R-3
DC-7
PMC-2
PMC-3
R-4
A-5
R-7
A-3
AE-2
A-1
AE-1
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4
M-5
E-3
PMC-5
E-2
E-6
DC-5
DC-6
A-2
H-1
Relative Score
CR
IT-
IC
AL
ME
DIU
MH
IGH
VE
RY
HIG
HL
OW
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 62
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Once combined, some of the priorities of these new, consolidated strategies has also changed. DC-2
remains critical; DC-3 and A-1 are very high; and M-1 and A-2 are medium priorities.
6.2.3 Non-Preferred Strategies
In addition to consolidation of several strategies, consultation with CHCC resulted in the removal of
some additional short-listed strategies given potential difficulties in implementation, or if they were
being addressed through other mechanisms.
Strategies removed from the short-list include:
AE-2 AE-1 DC-5 E-6
6.2.4 Order of Implementation
A total of 29 strategies have been established as a final list of prioritised works that should be
implemented as part of the Hearnes Lake Estuary Management Plan.
The proposed order of implementation of these 29 strategies is presented in Table 6-2. This
prioritisation assumes that all proposed works can be achieved within the nominated timeframes. If
delays in implementation occur, then this prioritisation should be modified to ensure that critical and
high priority strategies are still carried out within the timeframes nominated in the Plan, at the
expense of lower order priority tasks.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT 63
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Table 6-2 Order of implementation for short-listed strategies / options
Strategies
Immediate Short Term Medium Term
Critical DC-1 PMC-6 DC-2
Very High E-5 R-9 R-1 E-4 A-1
PMC-8 R-8
PMC-3
PMC-1
High R-2 DC-7
PMC-4 PMC-7
E-1 R-6 R-3
PMC-2 R-7
Medium M-1 E-3
M-3 M-4 A-2
Low PMC-5 E-2 H-1
Order of implementation
Immediate Short Term Medium Term
Critical 1
3
8
Very High 2
5
11
High 4
7
13
Medium 6
10
14
Low 9
12
15
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 64
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
7 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES
A program for implementation of the Hearnes Lake Estuary Management Plan has been developed
with tasks spanning approximately 5 years. The implementation details for each separate estuary
management strategy are provided in the following schedules.
The implementation details are presented in the form of ‘schedules’, and provide information on
specific actions required to implement each strategy, as well as indicative costs, timeframes,
maintenance requirements, responsibilities for implementation, and ‘performance measures’ to define
the success of implementation. Comments are also provided for each strategy, which includes
background information relevant to the implementation of the strategy and cross-references to other
similar strategies.
The schedules are designed to provide the information in a ‘quick reference’ format to facilitate
implementation and adoption by the responsible authorities.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 65
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
CRITICAL STRATEGIES
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 66
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
DC-1 – Buffer around lake from future development
Priority: CRITICAL
Strategy: Establish a buffer around Hearnes Lake that precludes any future development, including
any works (eg stormwater treatment) or clearing (eg bushfire protection) associated with future
development.
Timeframe: Immediately (12 – 18 months)
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: Staff time only
Performance Measure: Buffer around lake that is included in LEP and prohibits all future
development.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
DC-1-1 Include buffer into site specific DCP � �
DC-1-2 Include buffer as environmental protection land as
amendment to LEP 2000. Ensure prohibited uses
include stormwater treatment, clearing for bushfire
asset protection, general vegetation clearing, bulk
earthworks and similar
� �
DC-1-3 Include buffer as Environmental Protection Zone E3 –
Env. Management, or E2 – Environmental
Conservation, or similar, in proposed LEP review
� �
Comments:
The Hearnes Lake / Sandy Beach DCP includes a buffer around the Hearnes Lake waterway defined
as 50 metres from the RL 3.5m AHD contour (refer Section 9.4). This buffer is included in draft LEP
Amendment No. 29, which is currently with the Minister for consideration and approval. An
environmental constraints assessment by Sainty and Associates (2006) for Lot 22 DP 1070182 (the
land surrounding the southern portion of Hearnes Lake) concludes that buffers be placed around
Endangered Ecological Communities and the beach frontal dunes, while a general environmental
lake buffer be implemented to protect the environment and ecology of the lake based on the RL 3.5m
AHD contour. Sainty and Associates (2006) suggest, however, that some filling of land may be
acceptable to achieve a minimum level of RL 3.5m AHD providing the filled land is not within other
stipulated environmental buffers.
See also:
PMC-1, PMC-2, PMC-3, R-6
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 67
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-6 – Prevent artificial opening of lake entrance
Priority: CRITICAL
Strategy: Unless for exceptional circumstances, artificial opening of the Hearnes Lake entrance
should be prohibited.
Timeframe: Short term (1 – 3 years)
Responsibility: CHCC (support by DECC, Department of Lands, DPI-Fisheries)
Cost: Staff time only
Performance Measure: Formal policy adopted by Council.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
PMC-6-1 Prepare a formal entrance management policy for
Hearnes Lake outlining when and how entrance can
be artificially opened (eg only if there is a significant
and credible risk to human health). This may be a
component of a broader entrance management policy
covering all Council’s ICOLLs and coastal creeks.
� �
PMC-6-2 Give consideration to artificial entrance management
when assigning zonings and prohibited / permissible
developments as part of the proposed LEP review, in
accordance with the LEP template.
� �
Comments:
The entrance to Hearnes Lake has not been artificial opened for many years (not in recent memory),
however, an increase in local population and an increase in recreational demand imposed on the lake
may result in pressure from the community to artificially modify the entrance based on a perception of
poor water quality and/or inundation of foreshore assets and access.
The policy should clearly articulate that artificial opening of the entrance will not be permitted for the
purposes of flood mitigation. All future development and foreshore infrastructure should instead be
considerate of the risks associated with flooding and foreshore inundation over the entire life of the
development (taking into account changes associated with sea level rise etc).
The policy should also outline the development assessment and approvals process for artificial
entrance opening (when / if required) giving consideration to environmental impacts and mitigation
measures.
See also:
E-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 68
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
DC-2 – Manage stormwater from existing and future development through adopting WSUD principles
Priority: CRITICAL
Strategy: Develop and adopt a Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) policy and review the Urban
Stormwater Management Plan with investigations into sensitive areas. Best practice would include
implementation of Water Sensitive Urban Design and Integrated Water Cycle Management (including
stormwater harvesting and reuse), which are aimed at reducing stormwater runoff flows and pollutant
loads from urban areas by adopting a range of options including Gross Pollutant Traps (GPT),
rainwater tanks (with reuse for garden and lawn watering, toilet flush, laundry, hot water services,
etc), infiltration systems, grass swales (instead of kerb and guttering) and bio-retention basins.
Timeframe: Medium (3 – 5 years)
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: $300,000, as well as staff time
Performance Measure: Increase in pollutant and sediment loads entering Hearnes Lake within
acceptable limits – no increase preferable.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
DC-2-1 Develop and adopt a Water Sensitive Urban Design policy supporting water management with objectives DCP
� �
DC-2-2 Review Urban Stormwater Management Plan, and develop and implement a stormwater management strategy for Sandy Beach village to identify and prioritise stormwater management works and initiatives
� �
DC-2-3 Identify roadways within the catchment that potentially result in sediment runoff to waterways. Prioritise roadways based on proximity to waterways, surface gradient and other locations.
� �
DC-2-4 On a prioritised basis, construct sediment filtering measures to intercept sediment runoff prior to discharge to waterways.
� �
DC-2-5 One-on-one discussions with Colonial Surfside Caravan Park regarding options for managing surface water runoff to Hearnes Lake, and agree on terms of incentives for Caravan Park to undertake works.
� �
Comments:
To ensure that future development within the Hearnes Lake catchment has minimal impact on the
condition of the estuary, it will be necessary that all future developments implement a rigorous total
water cycle management system, incorporating the capture and reuse of stormwater. The most
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 69
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
effective way to ensure that ‘best practice’ stormwater management is implemented as part of all
future developments is to prepare and adopt a new Water Sensitive Urban Design Policy.
See also:
DC-7
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 70
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
VERY HIGH PRIORITY STRATEGIES
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 71
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
E-5 – Community-based volunteer group
Priority: VERY HIGH
Strategy: Establish and continue to support a local community-based volunteer conservation group to
assist with on-ground management tasks associated with Hearnes Lake.
Timeframe: Immediate (12 – 18 months)
Responsibility: CHCC (Landcare Support and Development Officer)
Cost: Staff time only, plus $5,000 /yr for materials and services
Performance Measure: Active and well attended volunteer group.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
E-5-1 Using the existing Coastcare group as a starting point,
advertise locally for interest in establishing a volunteer
group. This should include signage around the lake,
especially where works are planned.
� �
E-5-2 Prepare a works program for the volunteer group with
sufficient funds and resources to meet the program
within a desired timeframe.
� �
E-5-3 Co-ordinate regular (eg monthly) working days for the
volunteer group and provide with direction and
support.
� �
Comments:
The existing Hearnes Lake Coastcare Group has been responsible for rehabilitation and revegetation
around the Hearnes Lake entrance in the past. This group is not regularly meeting and has limited
membership.
A new volunteer group, or a revitalisation of the existing Coastcare Group, should target existing
residents, as well as new residents as they move to the area. Contributions to the group should also
be sought from local businesses, especially those who benefit from an improved environment (eg
caravan park).
The group is to be facilitated and supported through Council’s Landcare co-ordinator, and will assist
with undertaking manual environmental works around Hearnes Lake, such as weed eradication,
revegetation, access formalisation, signage erection and small infrastructure construction.
See also:
R-6, R-8
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 72
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
R-9 – Remove cattle from lake margins
Priority: VERY HIGH
Strategy: Cattle grazing along the periphery of Hearnes Lake, both within private and public lands,
are presently degrading foreshores and destroying vegetation (notably mangrove seedlings). These
cattle are to be excluded from the immediate lake area.
Timeframe: Immediate (12 – 18 months)
Responsibility: CHCC (support by DECC)
Cost: Depending on incentives offered to landowners – say $50,000.
Performance Measure: No cattle within sensitive fringe environments of Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
R-9-1 Initiate discussions with landowners regarding removal
of cattle and acceptable terms of agreement for
financial recompense or similar.
� �
R-9-2 Impose exclusion of cattle from lake margins are a
condition of consent for any future development on the
subject land
� �
R-9-3 Rezone land to an appropriate environmental (or
waterway) zoning as part of the proposed LEP review,
and prohibit cattle grazing within this zoning as part of
the LEP.
� �
Comments:
Exclusion of cattle will require fencing, both along property boundaries to prevent migration into public
lands, and along the lake edge to prevent migration into the waterway. Some areas of the lake
waterway are in private ownership, so exclusion of stock from these parts will require incentives to be
offered to landowners.
Much of the land being damaged by cattle is Endangered Ecological Community – Coastal
Saltmarsh. Protection of this land can therefore be aided through the application of the Threatened
Species Conservation Act 1995 and/or the Fisheries Management Act 1994.
See also:
PMC-1, PMC-3, R-6
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 73
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
R-1 – Connect caravan park to reticulated sewerage
Priority: VERY HIGH
Strategy: Connection of the wastewater system within the Colonial Surfside Caravan Park to
Council’s reticulated sewerage system, so that effluent is transferred to Woolgoolga STP for
treatment rather than going to on-site treatment ponds.
Timeframe: Immediate (12 – 18 months)
Responsibility: Proprietor (support by CHCC)
Cost: $50,000 (not including any headworks or mains)
Performance Measure: All wastewater generated from caravan park collected by reticulated
sewerage system and treated at Woolgoolga STP.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
R-1-1 Design and construct trunk sewerage mains, taking
into consideration potential future population demand
on mains
� �
R-1-2 Design and construct connection of Caravan Park
wastewater system to sewer mains � �
Comments:
It is suspected that the existing on-site sewage treatment ponds at the caravan park contribute to
poor water quality within Hearnes Lake, particularly following rainfall. Poor quality water within
Hearnes Lake compromises the value of the waterway for social and environmental uses, including
swimming, fishing and passive boating. Excessive nutrients within the waterway can also lead to
algae blooms and odour.
Costs are likely to be high, and as a result, connection to date has been delayed pending possible
construction of trunk works for proposed future residential development of adjacent lands.
See also:
R-2
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 74
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
E-4 – Rural education program
Priority: VERY HIGH
Strategy: To address excessive pollutant inputs entering the lake from upstream sources, a targeted
rural education program is to be developed aimed to achieving best-practice environmental
management throughout the rural community.
Timeframe: Immediate (12 – 18 months)
Responsibility: DPI-Ag (support from CHCC, NRCMA)
Cost: $20,000 /yr for program + incentives
Performance Measure: Number of rural landholders that change their practices and reduce pollutant
loads discharged to Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
E-4-1 Building on existing programs (CHCC, NRCMA, DPI),
prepare a target education program addressing
practices such as chemical and fertiliser use, sediment
control (including unsealed driveways), stock
exclusion, off-stream watering, effluent treatment and
reuse, gully erosion stabilisation, and vegetation
management.
� �
E-4-2 Implement education program through one-on-one
discussions, local field days / display areas, brochures,
information packs etc.
� �
E-4-3 Provide incentives to landholders to implement best
practice environmental management (financial,
resources, certification etc)
� �
Comments:
The NRCMA Steep Lands Project, implemented with Coffs Harbour Regional Landcare Incorporated
(CHRL), is already engaging local landholders regarding stabilisation and rehabilitation of steep
catchment lands. This program should build on existing initiatives underway by the NRCMA and DPI-
Agriculture.
Rehabilitated / revegetated lands could be covered by Conservation Agreements for further
environmental and landholder benefit (including rate relief, funding for management etc).
See also:
PMC-3, PMC-5, R-6, R-8, R-9, E-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 75
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
A-1 – Review and rationalise the current recreational uses of the estuary
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: The creation of a Foreshore Plan of Management (FPoM) to review and develop strategies
and to present environmental information is required to preserve the environmental sensitivity of the
area. Strategies to be considered include:
• discourage powered boats within Hearnes Lake, and encourage non-powered boats by providing
free canoe mooring facilities;
• Council policy for all dogs to be on leashes;
• 4WD access removed or relocated etc.
• plans for increased walking/cycle tracks around the locality.
Whilst it is recognised that areas must be provided that are suitable for exercising of dogs and for the
access of 4WD vehicles, the existing mix of dogs, people, vehicles and the environment at Hearnes
Lake Beach (Woolgoolga back beach) and around the fringes of Hearnes Lake, results in conflict.
The conflicting uses of the locality must be rationalised to ensure public safety and the environmental
quality of the area is preserved.
Timeframe: Immediate (12 – 18 months)
Responsibility: CHCC (support by DECC, MPA)
Cost: $100,000, plus staff time. Cost to implement amenity works and infrastructure to be met, in
part, by developer contributions.
Performance Measure: Adopted Plan that guides the management of future recreational use of the
lake and its surrounds.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
A-1-1 Implement a survey-based monitoring program
targeting users of Hearnes Lake and surrounds, in
order to gauge number and popularity of different
recreational uses of the estuary. Survey should
include monitoring of walking trails, dog walking on the
beach, 4WD users and boating/kayaking popularity
� �
A-1-2 Prepare a Foreshore Plan of Management (FPoM), for
the area presenting findings of the survey, with
justification regarding potential environmental damage
caused by the activities. Seek community input, and
Council to adopt. FPoM to include:
- Rationalisation of 4WD access and dog walking
� �
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 76
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
activities;
- Ensure no boat ramps are constructed within the
estuary, but include a free canoe launching facility
- Improve condition of existing walking tracks and
expand walking / cycling track along public land;
- Connection of foreshore tracks / cycleway with
regional facilities.
A-1-3 Implement findings of study with notification of
changes through signage, brochures and
advertisements.
� �
A-1-4 Regularly enforce restrictions and prohibitions through
ranger patrols at prime time exercising periods (eg
early morning, late afternoon, weekends).
� �
A-1-5 Repeat survey-based monitoring on a periodic basis
(every 5 years, say) depending on the speed of urban
development within the catchment and wider feeder
area.
� �
Comments:
Basic information obtained from the community as part of the Estuary Processes Study provides a
rudimentary indication of types of use. This information can form the basis for the development of a
more detailed user survey.
It is recommended that dog owners be strongly encouraged to control animals and clean up all
faeces from the beach area. Some bins and bag stations are already provided at main entry points to
beach, however, these can be made more obvious. It is recommended that an ‘on-leash’ only area be
established within 500 metres of the lake entrance, extending up to Willis Creek and Flat Top Point.
Provision of a designated off-leash section of the beach should be considered as part of a more
regional approach to dog-exercising, and should take into account the potential for disturbance of
native fauna and the loss of amenity for the general public.
The existing vehicular access is essentially to the lake edge. Only under favourable conditions can
4WDs then access the beach without travelling though the entrance channel waterway. Irregular
rocky outcrops within the entrance channel pose substantial risk to vehicles. The beach is located on
Crown land, which falls within the Solitary Islands Marine Park and the Coffs Coast Regional Park in
parts. Alternative access to the beach may also need to transect the Coffs Coast Regional Park.
Four wheel drive (4WD) vehicles can currently access the beach via a degraded and variable track
along the northern edge of Hearnes Lake entrance. The issue of 4WD access to the beach along this
track inspires community comments from both sides. 4WD access to the beach is considered
important, but this should not be at the expense of environmental damage or endangering other users
of the lake and foreshore. Given the dynamic nature of the lake entrance area, vehicles sometimes
drive through part of the entrance channel to access the beach. It is proposed that 4WD access to
the beach be considered in light of a more regional strategy for vehicular beach access. Ideally, and
in the long term, alternative vehicular beach access should be provided.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 77
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Existing motorised vessel usage on Hearnes Lake is minimal. Motorised vessels are likely to disturb
fauna (especially cryptic bird species) and detract from the natural setting of the environment (thus
reducing amenity).
The Foreshore Plan of Management should also incorporate the following:
• Improving condition of existing walking tracks;
• Bank stabilisation where existing tracks are being threatened (especially along northern
foreshore);
• A formal walking / cycling track along public land in front of the Caravan Park;
• Removal of existing footbridge and construction of a more engineered boardwalk connecting the
proposed Caravan Park walkway to the northern foreshore walkway;
• Possible connection of foreshore tracks / cycleway with regional facilities;
• Formalisation of access tracks over coastal dunes
See also:
PMC-1, R-6, A-2
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 78
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-8 – Amend SEPP-14 to include Hearnes Lake
Priority: VERY HIGH
Strategy: Using the most recent estuarine habitat mapping of Hearnes Lake undertaken by DPI-
Fisheries, include key habitat areas in Hearnes Lake within SEPP-14 legislation.
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3 years)
Responsibility: Department of Planning (support by DPI-Fisheries, DECC, NRCMA, CHCC)
Cost: Staff time only
Performance Measure: Gazetted amendment to SEPP-14 that includes new areas of coastal wetland
within Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
PMC-8-1 Building on recent habitat mapping (DPI-Fisheries,
Sainty, 2006), identify an area around Hearnes Lake
that should be protected by SEPP-14. This should
include existing habitat, and potential habitat to
accommodate predicted sea level rise.
� �
PMC-8-2 Draft amendment to SEPP-14 and consult with
affected landholders. � �
PMC-8-3 Approval of amendment by Minister for Planning and
formal gazettal of amended SEPP. � �
Comments:
Whilst protection of habitats could be achieved through rezoning of land under the proposed LEP
review, the timeframe for this review (~ 5 years) is considered too long to address immediate
concerns regarding vegetation clearing, excavation and cattle grazing. Inclusion of this area under
SEPP-14 would also highlight its significance at a state level (not just a local level).
See also:
PMC-1, DC-1, R-6, R-8, E-1, M-3
Refer Figure 6-4 for possible SEPP-14 expansion area.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 79
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
R-8 – Remove environmental weeds and pests
Priority: VERY HIGH
Strategy: Removal of environmental weeds (including for example bitou bush and lantana), and
control of pests (including for example feral cats and foxes) from private lands, Council-controlled
public lands, and the Coffs Coast Regional Park.
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3 years)
Responsibility: CHCC (support from DECC, community volunteer group, other environmental
volunteer groups, NRCMA)
Cost: Incentives for private land management, plus resources for volunteer groups, say $20,000 /yr
Performance Measure: Reduction in the number and extents of environmental weeds and pests
around Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
R-8-1 Link strategies and actions from the CHCC Pest
Management Strategy, Coffs Coast Regional Park
Weed and Pest Management Strategies to the
Hearnes Lake area
� �
R-8-2 Support volunteer groups and other labour resources,
as available, co-ordinated through the Landcare
Support Officer.
� �
R-8-3 Provide incentives and education to private
landholders within the catchment and around the lake
to better manage environmental weeds and pests.
� �
Comments:
Management of weeds and pests needs to extend into the upper catchment areas as well as around
the lake margins and along the coastal fringe (including the littoral rainforest area to the north of
Hearnes Lake entrance, and throughout the Coffs Coast Regional Park).
Works on public lands can be carried out by the community-based volunteer group, as well as other
environmental volunteer groups (eg Green Corps) or Work for the Dole programs. Environmental
management programs could also be established with local Aboriginal communities and educational
centres.
See also:
E-4, E-5
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 80
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-3 – Appropriate vegetation management
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Review and strengthen planning instruments (e.g. City-wide Vegetation Strategy) ensuring
development restrictions for the unnecessary removal of vegetation or lopping of trees, requirements
for compensatory replanting of any cleared vegetation (at an appropriate ratio) and the compulsory
maintenance and conservation of these revegetated lands by property owners. Compulsory
replanting of vegetation shall be situated within the locality from which it was removed.
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3 yrs)
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: Staff time only
Performance Measure: Modified planning instruments that better protect existing vegetation,
including inappropriate lopping of trees.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
PMC-3-1 Review existing planning instruments (eg DCP, LEP,
TPO) to determine the existing conservation status of
all native vegetation.
� �
PMC-3-2 As necessary, amend existing planning instruments, or
prepare additional instruments, to ensure that no
existing native vegetation is permitted to be cleared
without detailed consideration of environmental
consequences.
� �
PMC-3-3 Amend DCP, as appropriate, to promote ‘filtered
views’ rather than ‘water views’ or ‘lake views’
(implying that some obstruction by vegetation should
always be expected)
� �
PMC-3-4 Modify existing DCPs and/or prepare a new shire-wide
DCP to require compensatory revegetation to be
subject to compulsory Conservation Agreement with
permanent connection to land title (following
vegetation establishment and maintenance period).
� �
Comments:
The conservation of vegetation is underpinned by a range of different legislation depending on the
zoning of the land. The review of existing planning instruments needs to scrutinise the documents to
ensure that possible loop holes in the ‘grey’ areas do not permit the removal of valuable vegetation.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 81
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
All substantial stands of existing native vegetation should be retained when considering future
development of areas within the catchment. These areas should thus be incorporated into proposed
open space areas, and if possible, linked to other areas of existing vegetation through proposed
additional rehabilitation works to improve their value in the future.
The amount and type of compensatory revegetation should be established scientifically using the
DECC Biometric Tool or similar. As a guide, revegetation should be ‘like for like’, at a ratio of 2:1 (that
is, 2 hectares of revegetation per hectare cleared). Areas revegetated, once well established, should
be considered for Conservation Agreements with DECC or the NRCMA.
The Conservation Agreements should be attached to the title of the land parcel, thus ensuring that
the Agreement, and the associated vegetation, is retained in the future.
See also:
PMC-2, PMC-5, E-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 82
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-1 – Acquire and preserve foreshore land
Priority: VERY HIGH
Strategy: As lands become developed around Hearnes Lake, appropriate foreshore buffers should
be returned to public ownership. These buffers should be zoned accordingly to protect them from
future degradation.
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 years) – or as land around the lake is developed.
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: Staff time only with land handed over as part of development consent conditions. Maintenance
costs for new public land to be considered relative to acquisition of asset.
Performance Measure: Extent of foreshore land (including appropriate buffers to future development)
returned to public ownership around Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
PMC-1-1 Identify lands subject to acquisition upon development,
and rezone to an appropriate environmental protection
zoning, which excludes future development as part of
proposed LEP review, in accordance with LEP
template.
� �
PMC-1-2 Modify existing local and/or regional Developer
Contributions Plans to require hand-over of foreshore
land as a component of Developer Contributions for
each future development.
� �
Comments:
Lands subject to acquisition may correspond to the environmental buffer established as part of the
Hearnes Lake / Sandy Beach DCP, which encompasses all foreshore land up to a distance of 50
metres from the RL 3.5m AHD contour.
See also:
DC-1, PMC-2, R-6
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 83
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
HIGH PRIORITY STRATEGIES
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 84
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
R-2 – Audit on-site sewage systems
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Carry out immediate and then periodic audits of all on-site sewage management systems
located within the Hearnes Lake catchment. All deficient systems are to be repaired or replaced by
the landholder.
Timeframe: Immediate (12 – 18 months)
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: Staff time only
Performance Measure: Record of compliance / non-compliance for all on-site systems, and record of
replacement of non-compliant systems, thus reducing pollutant inputs to Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
R-2-1 Undertake audit / assessment of all on-site sewage
systems within Hearnes Lake catchment � �
R-2-2 For deficient systems, issue defect notice requiring
landholder to repair / replace system within a given
timeframe.
� �
R-2-3 Repeat audits on periodic basis � �
Comments:
Apart from the higher density urban area of Sandy Beach, all development within the Hearnes Lake
catchment is serviced by on-site sewage management systems. These sewage systems may
represented a major source of bacteria, pathogens and nutrients to the lake, as many would be old
and dysfunctional.
Every on-site sewage treatment system is to be assessed / audited, along with the surrounding soil
conditions (eg permeability), to determine the likely potential of the system to pollute the environment.
Systems that are found to be inappropriate should be repaired or replaced by landholders.
Alternatives may include aerated holding tanks and regular pump-out, or surface disposal and
evaporation, or a combination of treatments. Given the relatively close proximity of sites to the
reticulated sewerage system, consideration could also be given to connecting some lots to the
sewerage system.
Any on-site systems located below a level of RL 3.5m AHD should be replaced with a storage tank
and pump-out facilities, or connected to the reticulated network.
See also:
R-1, E-1, E-4
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 85
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
DC-7 – Promote eco-friendly development
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Future development within the Hearnes Lake catchment should be carried out in a manner
which gives consideration to the sensitivity of the natural environment. This should be ensured by
placing strict controls on development with respect to environmental issues.
Timeframe: Immediate (12 – 18 months)
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: Staff time only
Performance Measure: Eco-friendly concepts included in all new developments.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
DC-7-1 Review Hearnes Lake / Sandy Beach DCP for
consistency with the principles of eco-friendly
development. Modify the DCP where inconsistencies
are found.
� �
DC-7-2 Introduce development controls to areas beyond the
Hearnes Lake / Sandy Beach DCP boundary that
incorporate the principles of eco-friendly development.
� �
Comments:
Eco-friendly development is considered to incorporate:
• vegetated foreshore and riparian buffers (minimum 50 metres);
• Additional bushfire buffer, beyond the vegetated buffer requirements;
• On-site stormwater management and re-use provisions, including grass swales instead of kerb
and guttering;
• Retention of all existing native vegetation, and rehabilitation of existing degraded environments;
• Strong focus on pedestrian and cycleways;
• Limitations on domestic animals to prevent predation on native fauna, and
• Urban design that compassionately merges the built and natural environments to give an
ecological slant to developments.
Refer to the Coastal Design Guidelines (DoP, 2003) for further details.
See also:
PMC-3, DC-2, E-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 86
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-4 – Highway upgrade considerations
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Ensure that the impacts on lake environments are considered when planning and
constructing upgrades of the Pacific Highway through the Hearnes Lake catchment.
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3 yrs)
Responsibility: RTA
Cost: Staff time only
Performance Measure: No degradation of the Hearnes Lake environment following upgrading of the
Pacific Highway through the catchment.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
PMC-4-1 Environmental assessments for highway upgrade to
consider the unique and sensitive environment of
Hearnes Lake, especially the intermittent hydrological
regime and the sensitivity to input loads (including
sediment)
� �
PMC-4-2 Design mitigative measures to prevent degradation of
Hearnes Lake. This should include pre-treatment of
all highway runoff before discharge to natural
waterways, and oil arrestors to limit impacts of spills.
� �
PMC-4-3 Implement best management practices during
construction of the highway upgrade to prevent
impacts on Hearnes Lake and tributaries, especially in
respect to erosion and sediment control.
� �
Comments:
The proposed highway upgrade between Sapphire and Woolgoolga has already identified a preferred
route. The RTA has lodged an application for project approval with the Department of Planning.
Further consultation is planned by the RTA prior to finalising of the project.
See also:
M-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 87
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-7 – Effluent reuse farm expansion considerations
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: The existing effluent reuse farm located adjacent to Double Crossing Creek is planned for
expansion. Any expansion of this facility should first ensure that there will be no detrimental impacts
on the Hearnes Lake receiving water, especially any nutrient enrichment of waters, or excessive
microbiological contamination.
Timeframe: Short Term
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: Staff time only, or $50,000 for external consultant
Performance Measure: No measurable impact on nutrients of bacteria in Double Crossing Creek
following expansion of the effluent reuse farm.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
PMC-7-1 Undertake water balance and pollutant load
assessment to determine capacity of farm to
accommodate additional effluent.
� �
PMC-7-2 Rigorous assessment of environmental impacts of
existing operation, and predict environmental
consequences of expanded operations
� �
PMC-7-3 Implement best management practices during
construction of the works to prevent impacts on
Hearnes Lake and tributaries, especially in respect to
erosion and sediment control.
� �
Comments:
Review of existing information suggests that the existing operation is not having a significant impact
on the quality of water in Double Crossing Creek or Hearnes Lake. This would need to be maintained
if the operation was to be expanded.
See also:
M-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 88
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
E-1 – Raise awareness of SIMP / Hearnes Lake values
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Education targeting permanent residents and visitors that explains the ecological values of
Hearnes Lake and the role it plays to the importance of the overall SIMP.
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3 yrs)
Responsibility: MPA (support by CHCC, NRCMA, DECC)
Cost: $20,000 to develop site-specific education material and signage, then $5,000 /yr for
dissemination.
Performance Measure: A more informed and aware community that is more responsible regarding
the use of the lake and surrounds.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
E-1-1 Develop a range of eco-educational materials,
including brochures, signage, school resource kits that
provide site-specific information regarding Hearnes
Lake and the SIMP.
� �
E-1-2 Distribute eco-educational materials to permanent
residents and visitors on a regular basis (at least once
per year) to reinforce information and maintain
awareness levels.
� �
Comments:
Community education should target, as a minimum:
• Domestic nutrient reduction;
• Domestic and public vegetation management;
• Domestic / companion animal management;
• Impacts of human activities, including informal foreshore and waterway access;
• Threatened species conservation;
• Legal fishing limits and other SIMP restrictions
• Bushfire Management.
See also:
E-2, E-3, E-4
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 89
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
R-6 – Revegetation of foreshores and in catchment
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Revegetation of ecologically important areas throughout the catchment, including the buffer
area around Hearnes Lake, riparian zones along tributaries and watercourses, and wildlife corridors
across the landscape. Revegetation of private lands is likely to require incentives.
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3 yrs)
Responsibility: CHCC and landholders (support by NRCMA and DECC)
Cost: $200,000 depending on resources and incentives offered to private landholders
Performance Measure: Increased coverage of native vegetation around the Hearnes Lake foreshore
and throughout the catchment more generally.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
R-6-1 Identify revegetation and rehabilitation works around
Hearnes Lake and throughout the catchment included
within broader revegetation strategies
� �
R-6-2 Support Landcare and other groups to progressively
implement rehabilitation and revegetation programs. � �
R-6-3 Hold one-on-one discussions with key landholders
requiring revegetation and rehabilitation of private
lands, and agree on terms of incentives to undertake
works.
� �
Comments:
The NRCMA is currently working with private landholders in the Hearnes Lake catchment to
remediate steep lands, mainly old and disused banana lands.
Revegetation can be incorporated into consent conditions for future developments within the
catchment. Once revegetated, private lands of conservation significance can be protected through
Conservation Agreements in negotiation with the NRCMA or DECC.
See also:
PMC-1, DC-1, PMC-3
See Figure 6-5 for proposed revegetation north of Hearnes Lake.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 90
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
R-3 – Appropriate sewerage system management
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Existing and future sewerage systems around Hearnes Lake should be sized and
managed to minimise overflows entering Hearnes Lake, and should include contributions from the
Caravan Park. Existing and future infrastructure should also consider the variable water levels of the
lake and the potential for significant water level increase with future sea level rise.
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3yrs)
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: Depends on mitigative works required, say $100,000.
Performance Measure: Reduction in sewage overflows directed to Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
R-3-1 Assess existing sewerage system in catchment (eg
Sandy Beach) for under-capacity and potential
overflows within a planning horizon
� �
R-3-2 Upgrade existing sewerage infrastructure, as
necessary, to prevent future overflows to Hearnes
Lake
� �
R-3-3 Ensure design of future sewerage infrastructure
prevents overflows to Hearnes Lake, and adequately
accommodates future sea level rise (ie allow for
inundation up to RL 3.5m AHD minimum)
� �
Comments:
Minimal works should be required to the existing system given relatively recent connection to
reticulated sewerage. Future sewerage networks will be designed and constructed as development
within the catchment progresses.
See also:
R-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 91
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-2 – Incorporate foreshore and coastal buffers into CCRP
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Following the dedication of foreshore buffers around Hearnes Lake, these lands should be
incorporated into the Coffs Coast Regional Park. Further, the existing coastal dune vegetation
between Hearnes Lake entrance and Willis Creek entrance, and the development buffers from this
vegetation, should be included into the CCRP. This would provide connectivity between areas of the
CCRP to the north of Willis Creek and to the south of Hearnes Lake.
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 yrs)
Responsibility: CHCC, DECC
Cost: Staff time only (additional resources required to manage and maintain the land, some costs
may be required for initial land rehabilitation, possibly offset by developer contributions)
Performance Measure: Inclusion of subject lands within gazetted area for Coffs Coast Regional Park.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
PMC-2-1 Modify Developer Contributions Plan to include
developer contributions to the rehabilitation /
maintenance of former private lands handed over to
the public as a condition of development consent.
� �
PMC-2-2 Establish Memorandum of Understanding with DECC
that existing private lands to be handed over to
Council as a condition of development consent will be
incorporated into CCRP.
� �
PMC-2-3 Once sufficient foreshore and coastal buffer lands are
in public ownership, formally modify the extents of
CCRP
� �
PMC-2-4 Erect appropriate signage and carry out periodic
maintenance in accordance with the CCRP Plan of
Management.
� �
Comments:
Costs associated with hand-over and initial maintenance / rehabilitation could be covered by
developer contributions. This would need to be specified as part of the Developer Contributions Plan
for the area.
See also:
PMC-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 92
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
R-7 – Rehabilitate former timber mill and other lands
Priority: HIGH
Strategy: Remediation of the disused timber mill adjacent to Double Crossing Creek as well as any
other lands within the catchment that are potentially affected by contamination from historical
landuses.
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 yrs)
Responsibility: Landholders (support by CHCC, DECC-EPA)
Cost: Unknown, depending on extent of contamination
Performance Measure: No pollutant discharge or leachate from contamination sites that can
potentially degrade the Hearnes Lake environment.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
R-7-1 Amend DCP to require any potential contaminated
lands to be assessed and remediated, as necessary,
prior to consideration for future land development.
� �
R-7-2 Carry out a detailed site assessment of the timber mill
to determine the extent of land contamination and a
recommended strategy for remediation.
� �
R-7-3 Implement remediation measures and monitor over an
extended period (say 5 years) to determine
effectiveness of measures prior to any change in
landuse.
� �
Comments:
As well as the former timber mill, some former banana lands in the upper catchment area may be
contaminated due to historic pesticide use.
Adequate sediment and erosion controls will be essential during and after rehabilitation works.
See also:
M-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 93
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
MEDIUM PRIORITY STRATEGIES
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 94
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
M-1 – Water quality monitoring
Priority: MEDIUM
Strategy: Undertake periodic monitoring and assessment of the water within Hearnes Lake for
compliance with human health (primary contact recreation activities) and provide commentary on the
general health of the estuary. Monitoring should be carried out in accordance with water quality
standards and guidelines (ie at least 4 times per month during peak swimming season).
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3 yrs)
Responsibility: CHCC (support by DECC-EPA)
Cost: Staff time for collection, plus $20,000 /yr for commercial lab analysis.
Performance Measure: Documented record of compliance of Hearnes Lake water quality to human
health standards, and on environmental status of Hearnes Lake with respect to physical and chemical
water quality parameters.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
M-1-1 Monitor water levels within Hearnes Lake. Periodically
(every 2-3yrs say), assess the value of continuing data
collection.
� �
M-1-2 Prepare and implement a pilot monitoring program (for
a period of approximately 12 months) to determine
logistics, costs, suitable locations and feasibility of
monitoring.
� �
M-1-3 Pending outcomes from the pilot monitoring program,
prepare and implement a permanent water quality
monitoring program that assesses the suitability of
Hearnes Lake for human health.
� �
Comments:
Monitoring should be carried out in accordance with water quality standards and guidelines (ie at
least 4 times per month during peak swimming season) at locations that concentrate waterway use.
Given the ponded nature of Hearnes Lake, pollutants may be dispersed evenly around the waterway
by wind-driven circulation currents. Non-compliance of water quality to human health standards
should be notified to the public (advising of potential risks) and identification and management of
sources of pollutants.
Monitoring should be carried out as a function of catchment runoff to determine of the response of the
lake to catchment pollutant inputs. Monitoring should target repetitive sampling at different time
periods after the runoff event. A number of events should be monitored each year of varying
magnitude and during different seasons. Monitoring should target key environmental response
indicators, such as dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll-a, turbidity and nutrients. Water quality should also
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 95
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
be correlated to water levels and entrance breakout events to determine the impacts of
hydrodynamics on environmental water quality conditions.
See also:
nil
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 96
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
E-3 – Raise awareness regarding risks to users
Priority: MEDIUM
Strategy: Users of Hearnes Lake are to be made more aware of the potential risks associated with
their activities, particularly at certain times (eg after rain events or after entrance breakout). This
would include any primary contact activities (eg swimming, kayaking), fishing, and 4WDing. Risks
should be highlighted via appropriate signage and periodic education campaigns. If water quality is
consistently not conforming to human health standards, then this information could be signposted at
key recreational access points.
Timeframe: Short Term (1 – 3 yrs)
Responsibility: CHCC (support by MPA)
Cost: $5,000 + some staff time
Performance Measure: Increased awareness of risks by users, and thus a reduction of use of the
lake during periods of increased risk (eg after rainfall events).
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
E-3-1 Erect signage that clearly outlines potential risks to
users of the lake and surrounding lands. � �
E-3-2 Continue to update signage as new information about
Hearnes Lake and its response to inputs becomes
available.
� �
E-3-3 Include information regarding risks to users within all
educational material prepared for Hearnes Lake. � �
Comments:
The main risk to users relates to bacterial contamination of the water, as a result of local on-site
sewage management systems and other catchment inputs. Given the turn around time for
microbiological laboratory analysis, the potential delay in notification should be redressed through a
blanket notification advising of likely poor water quality conditions following all rainfall events. The
timeframe for which this would be applicable should be subject to initial investigative sampling (ie
determine how quickly after rainfall event bacteria levels fall to below recreational standards).
4WD use around the lake is also risky, particularly for vehicles crossing the entrance channel given
the presence of shallow and irregular rocky outcrops within the channel.
See also:
E-1, M-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 97
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
M-3 – Re-map aquatic vegetation
Priority: MEDIUM
Strategy: On a periodic basis, estuarine vegetation within Hearnes Lake should be remapped.
Variations in extent of vegetation can be used to provide an indication of response to changing
environmental conditions (erg water quality, hydrology, climate, entrance conditions etc).
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 yrs)
Responsibility: MPA (support by DPI-Fisheries, CHCC, NRCMA)
Cost: $20,000 per episode (expect 2 in next 10 years).
Performance Measure: Documented record of estuarine vegetation extents within Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
M-3-1 Using a range of techniques (aerial photography
interpretation, ground truthing, echo sounding habitat
mapping, underwater video), remap the extents of
estuarine vegetation (mangroves, saltmarsh,
seagrass) within Hearnes Lake.
� �
M-3-2 Repeat re-mapping exercise at frequency of
approximately 5 years. � �
Comments:
Estuarine vegetation has recently been mapped by DPI-Fisheries. Remapping of vegetation would
therefore not be required for about 5 years, and approximately each 5 years thereafter.
See also:
nil
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 98
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
M-4 – Monitoring of biological indicators
Priority: MEDIUM
Strategy: Undertake periodic monitoring of key biological parameters to provide a commentary on
the general health and biodiversity of Hearnes Lake. Monitoring would involve repeat surveys at
intervals that best reflect natural and anthropogenic change in community structure and condition.
Frequency of monitoring would depend on the community targeted and the resources available for
undertaking works.
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 yrs)
Responsibility: MPA (support by CHCC, DPI-Fisheries, NRCMA)
Cost: $30,000 per monitoring episode (expect at least 2 in next 10 years)
Performance Measure: Documented reports on biological condition of Hearnes Lake, with
comparisons to previous monitoring episodes and commentary of extent and reasons for change.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
M-4-1 Prepare and implement a multi-faceted biological monitoring program, targeting assessment of overall environmental / estuarine health.
Ecological communities targeted by the monitoring
program may include (but not limited to) benthic fauna,
mobile aquatic fauna, estuarine vegetation condition
and seagrass depth limits. Weeds and pest species
should also be included as biological indicators of
disturbance.
� �
M-4-2 Modify program, if necessary, based on monitoring difficulties or environmental constraints
� �
Comments:
Monitoring episodes and statistical assessments could be carried out by students of UNE / National
Marine Science Centre, under the guidance and supervision of qualified ecologists.
Monitoring should be designed to consider Before-After-Control-Impact associated with the proposed
urban expansion within the Hearnes Lake feeder area.
See also:
M-2, M-3
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 99
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
A-2 – Additional amenities and contributions
Priority: LOW
Strategy: Install and maintain additional picnic facilities and community amenities around Hearnes
Lake, to be partly funded through Developer Contributions from future developments located in the
Hearnes Lake feeder area.
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 yrs)
Responsibility: CHCC
Cost: $50,000, partly funded through Developer Contributions
Performance Measure: New facilities in place and utilised by the public.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
A-2-1 Modify local or regional Developer Contributions Plan
to specify developer contributions towards recreational
facilities and amenities outside the immediate
development footprint.
� �
A-2-2 Determine the most appropriate locations and extents
of new facilities and amenities. This would be
undertaken in conjunction with Strategy A-1
(development of a Foreshore Plan of Management)
� �
A-2-3 Erect facilities and maintain to ensure minimal impact
on the lake environment. � �
Comments:
Many members of the community identified a lack of picnic facilities and public amenities around
Hearnes Lake, including picnic tables, barbeques, shelters and toilets. The need for facilities will
increase further as the local catchment population increases following future urban development.
Additional facilities and amenities should be erected around the lake to cater for the existing and
future demands on the lake. Of notable importance are waste bins. These bins would also need to be
serviced on a regular basis.
Additionally future development will result in an increased demand on existing recreational facilities
and amenities around the lake. The increased usage of the lake will also impose an increased
demand for better access to the lake foreshore and along the lake shores.
Developers should be required to provide financial contributions to upgrading or improving
recreational facilities and amenities around Hearnes Lake. The actual amounts provided by
developers should be based on the population associated with individual developments, subject to
negotiations with Council.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 100
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
See also:
A-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 101
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
LOW PRIORITY STRATEGIES
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 102
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
PMC-5 – Conservation of private vegetation
Priority: LOW
Strategy: Encourage conservation agreements with DECC or NRCMA over private lands through
incentives. The agreements are to cover strategically identified priority areas of significant native
vegetation, habitat and environmental value located within the Hearnes Lake catchment.
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 yrs)
Responsibility: NRCMA, DECC
Cost: Staff time only, plus scope of incentives offered to landholders
Performance Measure: Total area of private vegetation within Hearnes Lake catchment covered
under Conservation Agreements
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
PMC-5-1 Identify areas within catchment that are suitable for
offering Conservation Agreements � �
PMC-5-2 Hold one-on-one discussions with landholders of
identified areas, and agree on terms of incentives for
Conservation Agreements
� �
PMC-5-3 Formally register Conservation Agreements, and
undertake works / maintenance as agreed � �
Comments:
Agreements would be based on private landholders managing their land for conservation purposes
only, and would require:
• Active rehabilitation / revegetation of degraded sensitive areas and critical habitats;
• Preventing stock access near waterways and critical habitat areas;
• Revegetation of riparian vegetation; and
• Weed and pest management.
Incentives could be provided under the DECC administered Native Vegetation Incentive Fund,
NRCMA programs or DECC (NPWS) programs.
Maintenance of the lands subject to conservation agreements would remain the responsibility of
landholders.
See also:
PMC-3, E-4
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 103
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
E-2 – Raise awareness of cultural values
Priority: LOW
Strategy: In consultation with the Aboriginal community, highlight the cultural significance and value
of Hearnes Lake to the local indigenous people through a range of educational media.
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 yrs)
Responsibility: CHCC, LALC
Cost: $20,000 for set-up plus some on-going costs for redistribution
Performance Measure: Dissemination of Aboriginal cultural information to the local community and
other users of Hearnes Lake.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
E-2-1 Design an Aboriginal heritage communication and
education program, incorporating a range of media
and approaches, such as brochures, field signage,
videos, etc., and link with existing schools education
program, if possible.
� �
E-2-2 Implement Aboriginal heritage communication and
education program � �
Comments:
Community education programs could include bush tucker tours, dreamtime stories and
demonstrations of Aboriginal practices, for example.
Other environmental education programs (refer Strategy E-1) should also incorporate information
regarding Aboriginal cultural values. Cultural signage should be located for maximum exposure, such
as at key access points to the lake.
See also:
E-1
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES 104
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
H-1 – Fishing cottage at lake entrance
Priority: LOW
Strategy: Assess the feasibility of restoring and retaining one of the old fishing cottages located at the
entrance to Hearnes Lake. Once restored, the cottage could be used for a range of commercial,
educational or administrative activities, and promotion of the CCRP.
Timeframe: Medium Term (3 – 5 yrs)
Responsibility: Dpt of Lands (support by CHCC and DECC)
Cost: $20,000 for feasibility assessment (possibly $100,000+ for restoration)
Performance Measure: Report on the feasibility of restoration and retention (for historical value) of a
fishing cottage at Hearnes Lake entrance.
Actions:
Action Ref No. Action description Underway Complete
H-1-1 Undertake a cost/benefit assessment on the value of
restoring and retaining one of the historical fishing
cottages at Hearnes Lake entrance.
� �
H-1-2 If considered justified, undertake works to restore one
of the cottages and implement a long-term
management plan for the property.
� �
Comments:
Cottages remain under permissive occupancy leases until the lessee hands back the rights or dies.
The progressive relinquishment of the leases over the cottages therefore is expected to take some
time.
See also:
nil
FUNDING OF THE PLAN 105
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
8 FUNDING OF THE PLAN
8.1 Funding requirements
The total cost of the Plan over the first 5 years is approximately $1.3 million, comprising $1.12 million
for capital works, and $190,000 for on-going funding commitments (maximum annual commitment =
$70,000).
11 of the 29 strategies will require no external funding, as they can be implemented using existing
staff only (although the capabilities of existing work force to take on additional tasks may need to be
assessed). Some additional tasks could also be carried out internally by stakeholders depending on
skills of staff (these tasks have assumed to be outsourced at present).
A summary of the funding requirements and associated timing for the funding is presented in Table
8-1. As shown in this table, all critically strategies to be implemented in the immediate and short term
require no external funding, as the tasks can be undertaken by stakeholder staff. The most
expensive strategies involve major investment in infrastructure (eg stormwater treatment measures,
Strategy DC-2; sewerage management measures, Strategy R-3), and revegetation (Strategy R-6).
These three strategies account for half of the Plan’s capital expenditure.
Table 8-1 Funding requirements for Plan implementation
Immediate Short Term Medium Term TOTAL
Critical $0
$0
$300,000
$300,000 capital
$0 on-go
Very High $200,000 capital $25,000/yr on-go
$20,000/yr on-go
$0
$200,000 capital $45,000/yr on-go
High $0
$370,000 capital $5,000/yr on-go
$0
$370,000 capital $5,000/yr on-go
Medium $0
$5,000 capital
$20,000/yr on-go
$100,000 capital
$105,000 capital $20,000/yr on-go
Low $0
$0
$140,000 capital
$140,000 capital
$0 on-go
TOTAL
$200,000 capital $25,000/yr on-go
$375,000 capital $45,000/yr on-go
$540,000 capital
$0 on-go
$1,115,000 cap
$70,000/yr on-go
FUNDING OF THE PLAN 106
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
8.2 Possible funding sources
Council is expected to fund parts of this Estuary Management Plan using environmental budget
allocations of general revenue. Given the high costs for overall implementation, however, the Plan will
be reliant upon receiving external grants and funding to be successful, some of which will require
matching funding from Council.
Primary funding sources include the NSW Government’s Estuary Management Program (refer
Section 8.2.1), the Northern Rivers Catchment Action Plan initiatives (refer Section 8.2.2), and a suite
of grant programs offered by local, state and federal government, as well as some private
organisations (refer Section 8.2.3).
In-kind contributions for completion of some of the elements of this Estuary Management Plan could
also come from various educational institutions (such as universities), who could use the estuary for
specific data collection or research projects. In-kind contributions could also come from volunteer
community groups, such as Landcare, Creekcare, and schools.
Opportunities should also be explored to utilise environmentally-oriented volunteer teams, such as
Greening Australia, Green Corps and Work for the Dole, to assist with physically demanding
elements of the Plan, such as revegetation works.
8.2.1 Estuary Management Program
Given that this Estuary Management Plan has been prepared in accordance with the NSW
Government’s Estuary Management Process, all works recommended by this Plan are eligible for
part (50:50) funding under the NSW Estuary Management Program. The only works that would not
be funded would be capital infrastructure works associated with Council’s sewerage system (ie
Strategy R-3).
8.2.2 Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority
The NRCMA has prepared an endorsed Catchment Action Plan (NRCMA, 2006), which outlines the
aims, objectives and strategies for catchment management across the whole of the NSW North
Coast region. Management Target C2 of the Catchment Action Plan (CAP) pertains to the
completion of Management Plans and implementation of priority strategies that contribute to
improved natural resource condition. The CAP also contains biodiversity and water themes, which
would also be relevant to this Estuary Management Plan. Subject to receipt of external project
funding, there is potential for the NRCMA to partly or wholly fund actions related to natural resource
management within the Hearnes Lake plan, such as strategic planning, community engagement,
educational and on-ground implementation where consistent with the NRCAP, NRCMA strategic
priorities, NSW State Targets and Australian Government priorities. This could contribute to the
implementation of the following strategies:
• PMC-3: Appropriate vegetation management
• PMC-5: Conservation of privately owned vegetation
• DC-2: Management of stormwater from existing and future development with adoption of
WSUD principles (particularly where contributions can be made toward Water Management
FUNDING OF THE PLAN 107
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Target W-1 River Structure, Riparian Vegetation and Fish Passage, and Coastal Management
Target C2 – Estuaries and Coastal Lakes).
• R-6: Revegetation of foreshores and within the catchment
• R-7: Rehabilitate former timber mill and other degraded lands
• R-8: Remove environmental weeds and control pests
• R-9: Remove cattle from lake margins and fence across waterway
• E-1: Raise awareness of habitat value of Hearnes Lake and importance of SIMP
• E-2: Raise awareness of cultural values
• E-4: Rural education program promoting best practice environmental management
8.2.3 Environmental Grants Programs
There are a number of state and federal government grant programs, and private foundations that
should be explored for potential funding of various strategies outlined within this Estuary
Management Plan. A number of these grant programs
Funding authority Example applicable
strategies
Natural Resource Management
Environmental Research Program DECC M-3, M-4
Forging Partnerships Program National Resources
Advisory Council
E-4, E-5
Urban Sustainability Grants DECC R-1, DC-2
Envirofund 2 NHT DC-2, R-6, R-7, R-8, R-9,
A-3, A-1, E-1, E-4
Restoration and Rehabilitation Program DECC R-6, R-7
Environmental Education
Eco-Schools Program DECC E-1, E-2
Environmental Education Program DECC E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, E-6
Commonwealth Environmental Education
Grants Program
DEH E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, E-6
Invasive Species
Local weed coordination and weed control DPI R-8, E-1, E-4
State Priority Weed Projects DPI R-8
2 The Natural Heritage Trust program has recently been replaced by the Federal “Caring for our Country”
program
FUNDING OF THE PLAN 108
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Funding authority Example applicable
strategies
Regional Weeds Plans and Group Funding DPI R-8
Defeating the Weed Menace fund Australian Government R-8, E-1, E-4
National Feral Animal Control program
NHT R-8, E-1, E-4
Marine and Coasts
Coastal Management Program DECC PMC-1, PMC-6, A-3, A-1
Estuary Management Program DECC All strategies, refer
Section 8.2.1.
Primary production
Natural Resource Innovation Grants National Landcare
Program
E-4
Environmental Management Systems Cth DAFF E-4, PMC-5
Water efficiency
Water Smart Australia Program Australian Government
Water Fund
E-4
General, planning and community
Community grants programs CHCC E-5, R-6, R-8
Community support grants National Landcare
Program
E-5, R-6, R-8
Corporate Community Program BHP Billiton E-2, E-5, DC-2, R-6, R-8,
PMC-5
Planning Reform Funding Program Department of
Planning
PMC-1, PMC-3, PMC-6,
PMC-8, DC-1, DC-5, A-2
Project AWARE Foundation Grants Project AWARE E-5, R-6, R-8
Macquarie Bank Foundation Macquarie Bank E-5, R-6, R-8
Natural Environment Grants Myer Foundation E-5, R-6, R-8
Westpac Operation Backyard Westpac Banking
Corporation
E-5, R-6, R-8
Ian Potter Foundation Grants Ian Potter Foundation R-6, R-8
ACCOMMODATING FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE 109
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
9 ACCOMMODATING FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE
9.1 Background
Contributions from increased anthropogenic gas emissions into the Earth’s atmosphere and its
associated acceleration of the ‘greenhouse-effect’ and thus rapid climate change is now a widely
accepted scientific phenomenon. The characteristics of a rapidly changing climate are now
recognised (Steffen, 2006). For example, WMO (2005) state that, with the exception of 1996, the last
10 years (1996 – 2005) have been the hottest years on record (globally averaged). In Australia, 2005
was the hottest year on record, at a temperature of 1.09°C higher than the 1961-1990 average (BoM,
2006). The past four years in Australia have been consistently significantly hotter than the 1961-1990
average (refer Figure 9-1).
Figure 9-1 Australian average temperature variation, 1910 – 2005 compared to 1961-1990
average (Source: BoM, 2006)
Increasing air temperatures across the globe in the future will cause a variety of climatic effects,
including sea level rise, increased atmospheric and ocean temperatures, and changes to rainfall and
drought patterns. Changes to climate in the next 30 – 50 years are considered inevitable, regardless
of possible reductions in anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (Lord et al. 2005).
In compliance with the ‘Precautionary Principle’, as espoused by the NSW Coastal Policy (refer
Section 1.7), management of Hearnes Lake over the next 50 to 100 years needs to accommodate
the potential impacts of climate change, despite the degree of uncertainty in many areas of climatic
predictions. In particular, Objective 2.2 of the Coastal Policy requires the consideration of future
ACCOMMODATING FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE 110
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
climate change in the planning and management of coastal resources and development and
promotes a ‘risk averse’ approach to decision making.
To assist with longer term strategic and land-use planning, the NSW Government has released a
Draft Sea Level Rise Policy Statement, which recommends consideration of a sea level rise of 0.9m
by 2100. In addition, CHCC has adopted to use a future sea level rise of 0.91m by 2100 for planning
purposes.
9.2 Predicted Changes Associated with the Enhanced Greenhouse Effect
Sea level rise is the most accepted of the predictions associated with climate change, however,
predictions as to the extent of this rise vary greatly due to the uncertainty of greenhouse gas
concentrations in the future and disagreement on the effect of various levels of such gases (Walsh
2004b).
Greenhouse gases within the atmosphere, enhanced by past, current and future human activities
across the globe, are expected to cause an increase in global atmospheric temperatures and will
represent the most significant global temperature variation in the last 10,000 years (IPCC 2001).
Macadam et al (2007) report changes to average temperature based on previous work by Holper et
al (2006), scaled by global warming values to produce projections of change for 2030 and 2070.
Using the two climate models and a range of global warming values, the daily maximum air
temperature is likely to increase by between 0.5 and 1.5°C by 2030, and by between 1.1 and 4.6°C
by 2070 (annually averaged). The annually averaged daily minimum air temperature is also likely to
increase, by between 0.5 and 1.4°C by 2030, and by between 1.1 and 4.3°C by 2070.
Mean sea level, on a global scale, has been increasing over the past century, due primarily to the
thermal expansion of the oceans as ocean temperature has increased (Cabanes et al., 2001), as well
as glacial melting (Walsh et al., 2002). Over the past 50 years or so, the widely adopted average sea
level rise has been approximately 1.8mm/yr (Walsh, 2004; Church et al., 2005). Sea level rise has
not occurred consistently, however, with the most recent trend (since the early 1990s) having an
accelerated rise or around 3.4 mm/yr, as captured by the TOPEX, and more recently Jason, satellite
data.
While there is a high degree of uncertainty with respect to projections for future change to rainfall and
wave climate, future sea level rise is more certain. IPCC (2007) project an increase in mean sea level
of between 0.18 and 0.59m by the end of the 21st century, with the possibility of an additional 0.1 to
0.2m due to ice sheet flow. Further, CSIRO has predicted additional localised sea level rise of up to
0.12m on the east coast of Australia due to thermal effects of the East Australian Current (McInnes et
al., 2007) (ie up to 0.91m). Based on the trend measured by most recent satellite observations, it is
likely that future sea level rise will track close to the upper limit of these projections, while a level of up
to 1.4m above 1990 sea levels may be possible (Rahmstorf, 2007).
Importantly, it must be recognised that sea level rise will not stop at the end of this century (the limit of
most reasonable projections). Indeed it is reported that the inertia of thermal expansion held within
the oceans now will result in continued sea level rise for many centuries or even millennia, regardless
of any future controls on CO2 emissions or global air temperature changes. Thus, sea levels may be
several metres higher than present before they once again stabilise, particularly if large land ice
ACCOMMODATING FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE 111
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
masses, such as Greenland, melt (IPCC, 2007). Such circumstances would essentially re-start
geomorphic evolutionary processes on the coast, including the landward transgression of coastal
barriers and the associated impoundments behind them. Sea level rise in Australia is also likely to be
affected by the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), a decadal cycle characterised by periods of
drought and dryer weather during the El Nino phase of the cycle, and relatively high rainfall and
wetter weather during the La Nina phase. The likely effects of a warmer climate on the ENSO are not
currently well understood.
On-going sea level rise beyond our immediate planning horizon prompts the recommendation for
adoption of conservative sea level rise estimates, as well as the initiation of a program of adaptation
and accommodation of continuously rising seas in the future.
An increase in mean sea level would result in an upward and landward translation of ocean beach
profiles (Bruun 1962, Dean and Maurmeyer 1983, Hanslow et al. 2000), thus causing net shoreline
recession (refer Figure 9-2). The changed beach processes will result in a net upward shift in typical
berm heights of coastal lake entrances.
Changes to wave climates and the direction of wave impact are also predicted in association with the
enhanced greenhouse effect. Specifically, east coast low pressure systems, which are currently
responsible for the majority of storm surge water levels and coastal erosion on the NSW coast, may
increase in frequency in the future (Walsh 2004a, Hennessey et al. 2004b). Hennessey et al. (2004b)
suggest that in NSW, waves from the southeast will become more dominant, and waves from the
northeast will become less so.
Figure 9-2 Shoreline response to increasing sea level (Hanslow et al., 2000)
Hennessey et al. (2004b) also suggest climate change will cause a decrease in rainfall during winter
and spring, and an increase in rainfall during summer for north coast areas of NSW. The intensity of
summer storms is forecast to increase by nearly 22% by 2030 (Hennessey et al. 2004b) across
NSW. Both Walsh (2004a) and Hennessey et al. (2004b) (in relation to NSW specifically) comment
that, overall, annual rainfall is likely to decrease, but rainfall volume per storm could potentially
increase.
In addition to rainfall changes, higher atmospheric temperatures are likely to increase evaporation
rates (Hennessy et al., 2004a). As a consequence of reduced rainfall and increased evaporation, it is
expected that average streamflow in Australia will decrease (Walsh, 2004a).
ACCOMMODATING FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE 112
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
9.3 Impacts of Climate Change on Hearnes Lake
The impacts of sea level rise on Hearnes Lake would include an increase in the average height of the
entrance berm, which means that lake water levels would need to reach a higher level before
inducing breakout across the berm. Typical water levels within the lake can therefore be considered
to increase contemporaneously with increasing sea levels as long as the entrance is not artificially
modified.
The predicted reduction in total rainfall, combined with an increase in evaporation due to the warmer
atmospheric temperature, would reduce the capacity of catchment runoff to fill Hearnes Lake. With
reduced catchment runoff and a larger storage potential associated with the higher entrance berm,
the frequency of an open entrance will reduce, thus increasing the overall proportion of time that the
entrance is closed. Possible rotation of Hearnes Lake Beach, to be more aligned with southerly
oriented swell, may further increase the amount of sand in the Hearnes Lake entrance compartment,
increasing the height of the berm and reducing the frequency of breakouts (Haines and Thom, 2007).
An increase in the proportion of time that the lake entrance is closed is considered to increase the
natural sensitivity of the lake to external inputs (Haines et al., 2006).
Further, future increases in typical water temperature of the lake may degrade water quality, by
reducing dissolved oxygen, and changing the solution of various salts and therefore dissolved
nutrients, metals and pollutants in the water column. In turn, aquatic species may respond to
changes in water chemistry, most notably, algal productivity may increase, causing flow on effects to
higher trophic levels of ecology. The distribution of aquatic flora and fauna may also be expected to
change in response to higher water temperatures.
9.4 Planning Considerations for Future Climate Change at Hearnes Lake
Management of climate change in the future will involve adaptation of systems to new environmental
conditions. Momentum associated with the climate system will result in many more impacts over the
next several decades (Steffen, 2006). It is considered that the ability of a system to adapt to these
changes and impacts will determine its ability to survive in a future warmer world.
Many environmental systems, such as wetlands, will survive providing that their migration path is not
inhibited and that the rate of migration / species adaptation can keep-up with rate of climate change
(see DEH 2003).
When planning for future development, consideration should be given to conditions at the end of (and
beyond) a realistic planning horizon (say 100 years for residential development). It is important that
protection of property and infrastructure built today will not be reliant upon artificial entrance
management to avoid inundation at some point in the future. Imposing such conditions on future
generations of landuse managers is considered inconsistent with the principles of Ecologically
Sustainable Development (which this Estuary Management Plan is required to satisfy, in accordance
with the central theme of the NSW Coastal Policy).
At present, the maximum natural breakout level of Hearnes Lake is expected to be within the range
2.2 to 3.0m AHD. With an assumed increase in sea level rise of 0.9 metres by the end of this century
ACCOMMODATING FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE 113
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
(as per the NSW Draft Sea Level Rise Policy, and the adopted CHCC Sea Level Rise Policy), the
natural breakout level by 2100 could be as high as RL 3.1 to 3.9m AHD. This Estuary Management
Plan recommends future development around the estuary is setback a minimum of 50 metres beyond
the RL 3.5m AHD contour (ie the mid-value within the range of possible maximum berm levels).
The vertical buffer (Figure 9-3) applied to all future development will allow for the natural expansion of
the lagoon and will allow existing vegetation communities to migrate upslope without being inhibited
by new infrastructure. Meanwhile, the horizontal buffer (Figure 9-3), applied to the landward extent of
the vertical buffer, will maintain sustainable functioning of fringing riparian ecosystems and protect the
waterway environment from the many potential impacts associated with adjacent urban development
(including impacts associated with increased demand on amenity) (Haines, 2005).
In addition to the above, the horizontal buffer can be used to accommodate additional inundation
around the foreshore in the event that flooding exceeds RL 3.5m AHD, while the vertical buffer allows
for additional set-back between the waterway and future development (more than the 50m buffer)
during times of normal water level (and during breakouts at lower berm levels).
Figure 9-3 Vertical and horizontal buffers to accommodate future sea level rise
(adapted from Haines, 2005)
Please note that this Estuary Management Plan has not made specific recommendations with
respect to Floodplain Risk Management, and the need to manage flooding risk in the context of future
climate change.
Max. existing berm level
Max. future berm level
Buffer
to m
ain
tain
eco
logic
al
funct
ion a
round w
ate
rway
Buffer
to a
llow
for
natu
ral
exp
ansi
on o
f w
ate
rway
with
fu
ture
sea le
vel r
ise
Total buffer between water and development
Horizontal buffer
Vertical buffer
Max. existing water level
ACCOMMODATING FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE 114
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
Management of existing development within the vertical and horizontal buffer provisions will need to
be on a site by site basis. Periodic review of this Estuary Management Plan will provide a
mechanism for slowly modifying the management of existing assets and infrastructure in the future.
It is considered that the strategies of this Plan address the need for system adaptation associated
with future climate change, and sea level rise in particular.
MONITORING, EVALUATION AND AMENDMENTS 115
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
10 MONITORING, EVALUATION AND AMENDMENTS
10.1 Monitoring of Plan Success
The success of the Estuary Management Plan should be gauged through its ability to achieve the
designated targets. The overarching targets are the Management Objectives, as described in
Section 5. However, the timeframe for achieving some of these objectives is long (given the slow
rate of vegetation establishment and growth, for example). To gain a better appreciation for the
relative success of the Plan, a series of evaluation measures can be assessed on a periodic basis.
Different types of evaluation measures are discussed in more detail below.
10.1.1 Primary Evaluation Measures
The first set of evaluation measures should ascertain whether the strategies are being implemented
within the timeframe designated in the Plan. As such, the primary performance measures are simply
a measure of implementation.
The Estuary Management Plan recommends some 29 different strategies over a period of 5 years.
Many of these strategies will need to be carried out concurrently. Organisations responsible for
implementation will need to review the Plan carefully and ensure that adequate resources are
allocated to the various strategies to ensure that the timeframe for implementation is achieved.
Clearly, a high degree of co-ordination will be required to manage the successful implementation of
all the strategies within the designated timeframe. This co-ordination should be facilitated by
Council’s Coast and Estuary Management Advisory Committee, who would be required to meet
regularly to discuss and manage the implementation of the estuary management strategies.
If it is determined that the strategies are not being implemented to the nominated timeframe then one
or both of the following contingencies should be adopted:
• Determine the cause for the delay in implementation. If delays are funding based, then seek
alternative sources of funding, including a formal request to Council to increase contributions to
the Plan. If delays are resource-based, seek additional assistance from stakeholder agencies
and/or consider using an external consultancy to coordinate implementation of the Plan;
• Modify and update the Estuary Management Plan to reflect a timeframe for implementation that
is more achievable. The revised Plan would need to be endorsed by all relevant stakeholders
and agencies responsible for implementation.
10.1.2 Secondary Evaluation Measures
The second set of evaluation measures relate to measuring specific performance outputs from the
individual strategies, as appropriate. The specific outputs from each strategy, are provided within the
Implementation Schedules (refer Section 7) under ‘Performance measure’. These measures define
what the specific outcome from each strategy should be. If these outputs are delivered as defined,
then the strategy is considered to have been successful.
MONITORING, EVALUATION AND AMENDMENTS 116
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
If the defined performance measures are not generated as a result of implementation of the strategy
then the following contingencies need to be adopted:
• Determine the reason for not producing the specified output. If the reason involves a lack of
funding or resources, then similar contingency measures to those described for the primary
performance measures (refer Section 10.1.1) should be adopted. If the reason is of a technical
nature, then expertise in the area should be consulted to overcome the technical problem.
DECC and other government agencies should have the necessary in-house expertise to assist in
most cases.
• Review the appropriateness of the specific output of the management strategy, and if necessary,
modify the output described in the Plan to define a more achievable product.
10.1.3 Tertiary Evaluation Measures
The third set of evaluation measures are aimed at measuring the outcomes of the Plan, and as such
relate to the specific management objectives of the Plan (as described in Section 5), and how
implementation of the Plan has made a difference to the biophysical and social environments of
Hearnes Lake (eg reduction in pollutant loads, improvement in swimming conditions, increase in
biodiversity etc). The main mechanism for gauging whether these objectives have been achieved, or
not, is monitoring. Therefore, monitoring of various elements of the physical, biological and social
environment is an essential component of assessing the overall success of the Estuary Management
Plan.
If, after a reasonable period of time, the specific objectives of the Plan are not being achieved by the
strategies being implemented, then the following contingencies should be adopted:
• Carry out a formal review of the implemented management strategies, identifying possible
avenues for increasing the effectiveness of the strategy in meeting the Plan objectives;
• Commence implementation of additional management strategies that may assist in meeting Plan
objectives (possibly ‘fast-track’ some longer term strategies as necessary);
• Reconsider the objectives of the Plan to determine if they set impossible targets for future
estuary conditions, and adjust the Plan, as necessary. Any such changes to the Plan would
need to be endorsed by the stakeholders and relevant government agencies, as well as the
public.
10.2 Reviews and Amendments
Periodic reviews and amendments of this Estuary Management Plan are necessary to ensure that it
remains current and relevant to the environmental management and planning framework in which it
operates.
It is proposed that the Hearnes Lake Estuary Management Plan is reviewed on a regular basis, and
completely updated within a period of about 5 years (ie before end 2012). A regular review of the
Plan (which may occur annually, for example) is necessary to allow modifications / alterations to the
management of the estuary, on an as-needed basis, within the context of an adaptive management
framework.
MONITORING, EVALUATION AND AMENDMENTS 117
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
The periodic Estuary Management Plan reviews should cover the topics described in Table 10-1.
This table also outlines who is responsible for conducting the periodic reviews.
It is possible that the NSW Government’s Estuary Management Program, under which this Plan has
been prepared and will be implemented, may change in the future. A new Coastal Zone
Management Manual is currently in preparation, and will combine and replace the existing Estuary
Management Manual (1992) and the Coastline Management Manual (1990). Therefore, on-going
liaison between Council, DECC and the NRCMA is necessary to ensure that the aims and objectives
of the Hearnes Lake Estuary Management Plan continue to be achieved in the future.
Table 10-1 Framework for Future Estuary Management Plan Review
Review Period Review tasks Responsibility
Annual • Assess primary, secondary and tertiary evaluation measures, and determine appropriate contingencies if performance measures do not meet targets
• Review funding arrangements and allocations for current and future management strategies
• Review resourcing and staffing allocations for current and future management strategies
• Provide report on progress of Estuary Management Plan implementation, results of annual review, and any modifications required to the Plan coming out of the review
Estuary Management Committee or appointed
external consultant*
To be coordinated through Council and reported to
Council, relevant stakeholders and government
agencies
5 Yearly
(first review to be completed by end 2013)
• Assess the overall effectiveness of each management strategy implemented to date
• For strategies requiring on-going commitment, assess the value in maintaining implementation of those strategies
• Reconsider the management options that were not short-listed and included in the original Plan
• Provide implementation details of additional strategies that are to be included in the subsequent 5 year Plan
• Update the Estuary Management Plan document to reflect proposed strategies for implementation over the next 5 year period, and seek endorsement by stakeholders, government agencies and the community.
Estuary Management Committee or appointed
external consultant*
To be coordinated through Council and reported to
Council, relevant stakeholders government agencies and the general
community
* It would be advantageous for the same consultant responsible for initially preparing the Estuary
Management Plan to be involved in the annual review and 5-yearly update, given their appreciation of
the study area and the details of the Plan and associated strategies.
MONITORING, EVALUATION AND AMENDMENTS 118
K:\N0988 HEARNS LAKE ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN\DOCS\R.N0988.004.03.EMP.DOC
10.3 Amendment Record
This Plan was last reviewed and amended on ………………………………………………..
The next scheduled review is due ………………………………………………………………