6.0 Cumulative and Other CEQA Cumulative... · 1 6.0 Cumulative Impacts and Other CEQA...
Transcript of 6.0 Cumulative and Other CEQA Cumulative... · 1 6.0 Cumulative Impacts and Other CEQA...
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐1 FINAL EIR
6.0 Cumulative Impacts and Other CEQA Considerations 12Thissectionaddressescumulativeimpactsandotherconsiderationsinaccordancewiththe3CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA),includinggrowth‐inducingimpacts,significantand4unavoidableadverseimpacts,andsignificantandirreversibleenvironmentalchanges,thatmay5occurasaresultoftheproposedproject.676.1 Cumulative Impacts 89InaccordancewithCEQA(CEQAGuidelinesSection15130etseq.)thisEIRanalyzesthecumulative10impactsoftheproposedprojectinconjunctionwithotherdevelopmentsthataffectorcouldaffect11theprojectarea.AccordingtoCEQA,acumulativeimpactreferstotwoormoreindividualeffects12thatareconsiderablewhentakentogether,orthatcompoundorincreaseotherenvironmental13impacts(CEQAGuidelinesSection15355).CEQArequiresthecumulativeimpactsdiscussionto14reflectthelikelihoodthattheimpactswouldoccurandtheirseverityiftheydidoccur,butallows15thediscussiontocontainlessdetailthanmustbeprovidedforindividualimpacts.Tocomplywith16CEQA,acumulativescenariohasbeendevelopedthatidentifiesandevaluatespast,present,and17reasonablyforeseeablefutureprojectswithinthecumulativestudyareathatwouldbeconstructed18orcommenceoperationduringthetimeframeofactivityassociatedwiththeproposedproject.19206.1.1 Methods 21Alistofdevelopmentprojectswithinthecumulativestudyareawereidentifiedandarepresented22inTable6‐1.Thelistincludespastprojects,projectsunderconstructionandapproved,andpending23projectsthatareanticipatedtobeeitherunderconstructionoroperationalbythetimeofthe24completionoftheproposedproject.Becausetheareawithinwhichacumulativeeffectcanoccur25variesbyresourcearea,forthepurposeofthisanalysis,thegeographicscopealsovariesaccording26totheresourcebeingevaluated.Forexample,trafficandnoiseimpactstendtobelocalizedwhileair27qualityandbiologicalresourcesimpactsaretypicallywidespread.Informationpertainingtopast,28present,andreasonablyforeseeablefutureprojectswasobtainedfromthePlanningDepartment29andDivisionwebsitesoftheCountyofSantaBarbara,theCountyofVentura,theCityofCarpinteria,30theCityofVentura,andtheUSForestService.Informationoncumulativeprojectswasalso31obtainedfromtheCaliforniaOfficeofPlanningandResearch(CEQANetDatabase)andSouthern32CaliforniaEdison.Figure6‐1depictsthelocationofeachproject.Eachofthelocationsarelabeled33withanumberthatcorrespondstothosepresentedinTable6‐1.Ininstanceswheretheanalysisin34Chapter4,“EnvironmentalAnalysis,”determinesthattheproposedprojectwouldresultinno35impact,theassociatedsignificancecriterionisdismissedfromthecumulativeimpactsanalysisin36Section6.1.3.3738Thistabledoesnotincludeallprojectsthatwouldcontributetocumulativeimpactsalongwiththe39proposedproject;rather,itincludesanumberofconcurrentprojectsintheareatodemonstratethe40scopeandnatureofdevelopmentinVenturaandSantaBarbaracounties.Whereconstruction41schedulesareunavailableoruncertain,thecumulativeimpactanalysisconservativelyassumesthat42constructionwouldoverlapwiththeproposedproject.43
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐2 FINAL EIR
Table 6‐1 Cumulative Projects within Five Miles of the Proposed Project
Project Number Project Name Description of Project
Distance from Nearest Project Feature (mi) Project Status
County of Santa Barbara A1 BlackOpalRanch Agriculturaldevelopmentplanfordevelopmentover20,000
squarefeet.0.8 Applicationfiledon
September19,2010.EnvironmentalReviewnotyetcompleted.
A2 LaEstanciaSerenaEquestrianCenter
Commercialhorsetraining,breedingandboardingfacilityforupto45horsestogetherwithsiteimprovementsforthefacility,aswellasaresidentialremodel,newguesthouse,poolcabana,swimmingpool,andanewprivatedriveway.
3.1 EnvironmentaldocumentappealperiodexpiredonApril21,2014.
A3 CarpinteriaValleyFarms
Developmentplanforbuildingandstructuresinexcessof20,000squarefeet.
3.9 ApprovedonApril1,2009.GradingpermitissuedonAugust5,2013.
A4 HolaniFarmsHorseBoardingFacility
Commercialhorseboardingfacilityforupto23horses.20,805squarefeet.
3.9 ApplicationapprovedonJune2,2010.PreconstructionconditionmonitoringunderwayasofAugust29,2013.
A5 SummerlandCommunityPublicSafetyCenter
Constructionofanewfirestation,meetingroom,offices,kitchenbathrooms,sleepingrooms,8,545squarefeetofdevelopment.
4.6 EnvironmentalreviewcompletedonOctober18,2012.PermitcompliancereviewinprogressasofAugust22,2013.
A6 ArroyoParidaCreekBridgeReplacementProject
Caltransbridgereplacement.RelocationofSCECarpinteria‐Ortega‐SantaBarbara66kVsubtransmissionlineandSheffield16kVlinesduetoreplacementoftheArroyoParidaCreekBridgeinCarpinteria.
1.8 Constructionanticipatedin2014.
City of Carpinteria B1 CarpinteriaValley
ArtsCenterNew7,911squarefootcommunityartcenter. 0.7 Projectapprovedasof
January2014.B2 Ellinwood/Green
HeronSpringDemooneunit,construct30newcondos. 1.3 Projectapprovedasof
January2014.
B3 CasaDeLasFlores 43apartmentsandacommunitycenter. 1.2 Projectapprovedasof
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐3 FINAL EIR
Table 6‐1 Cumulative Projects within Five Miles of the Proposed Project
Project Number Project Name Description of Project
Distance from Nearest Project Feature (mi) Project Status
January2014.B4 LagunitasMixedUse 37singlefamilydevelopments,36condos,85,000square
footoffice.0.8 Projectapprovedasof
January2014.B5 DorranceWaySingle
FamilyDevelopmentsConstructthreenewsinglefamilydevelopment. 0.9 Projectapprovedasof
January2014.B6 FifthStreetCottages Demoexistingunitandconstructtwonewunits. 0.8 Projectapprovedasof
January2014.B7 DamianiSingle
FamilyDevelopmentConstructonenewsinglefamilydevelopment. 0.6 Projectapprovedasof
January2014.B8 Gonzales
CondominiumsDemooneunit,constructfournewcondos. 0.9 Projectapprovedasof
January2014.B9 ParedonProject–
VenocoExtendedReachOil&GasDevelopment. 1.1 Projectproposedasof
January2014.B10 Gobuty
CondominiumsConstructtwonewunits,subdivideforcondos. 0.7 Projectproposedasof
January2014.B11 M3MixedUse
BuildingNew6,000squarefootcommercialbuilding&twoapartments.
0.6 ProjectapprovedasofJanuary2014.
B12 CarpinteriaValleyWaterDistrictWaterStorageTankProject
Theprojectconsistsofaspanbridgetoreplaceanexistingtemporaryrailcarbridgewiththenewbridge.Thenewbridgewillbea108‐footlongpre‐fabricatedsteeltrussbridgewithaconcretedeckandtheexistingranchroadwasalreadyrealignedtoprovideanadequateturningradius.BinwallshavebeeninstalledtoprotecttheroadbankfromstormflowsandseveralstormdrainoutletshavebeeninstalledonSantaMonicaCreekanditsephemeraltributaries.
0.7 NoticeofDeterminationfiledonOctober5,2012.
B13 LindenAve–CasitasPassInterchangesProject
ReplacementoftheLindenAveandCasitasPassRoadInterchangesincludingwideroverpasses,newrampconnections,andextensionofthefrontageroad(ViaReal).Relocationofapproximately20SCEdistributionpolesthatwillbeinconflictwithCaltranshighwayimprovements.
0.5 Constructionanticipated2013‐2016.SCEdistributionpolestoberelocatedin2014.
B14 RestorationofCarpinteriaCreek
TheCarpinteriaCreekWatershedCoalition(CCWC)isrestoringCarpinteriaCreektocreatenaturalandstablestreamsandvegetatedbankstosupportsteelheadtrout.CCWCisworkingonnumeroushabitatrestorationandsteelheadtroutrestorationprojects.CCWCalsopublishedCarpinteriaCreekWatershedAssessmentandManagement
0 Constructionactivitiesareon‐going.
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐4 FINAL EIR
Table 6‐1 Cumulative Projects within Five Miles of the Proposed Project
Project Number Project Name Description of Project
Distance from Nearest Project Feature (mi) Project Status
PlaninMarch2005.B15 SchildknechtSFD Constructonenewsinglefamilydevelopment. 0.75 Projectproposedasof
January2014County of Ventura
C1 PL12‐0152 Developmentofacontractorserviceyardon7.7acresofa22acreparcel.
0.9 PreparingtheenvironmentaldocumentasofApril2,2014.
C2 PL12‐0131 EradicationofnoxiousweedsalongtheripariancorridorofRinconCreek.
0.2 PermitapplicationundergoingcompletenessreviewasofJuly1,2013.
C3 PL13‐0058 Newwirelesscommunicationfacilitydesignedasa65’tall‘faux’watertank.
2.7 AwaitingCUPapplicationresubmittalasofApril2,2014.
C4 PL12‐0136 Conversionofexistingcontractor’sserviceandstorageyardintoaClassIIOilfieldWasteDisposalFacility.ClassIIfluidsarewastestreamsassociatedwithoilandnaturalgasproductionoperationsandprimarilyinclude:producedwater,drillingmud,andtankbottoms.
4.9 AwaitingpermitapplicationresubmittalasofJuly1,2013.
C5 PL13‐0074 Constructionofa6,000squarefootindustrialbuilding. 2.6 PermitapprovedonJanuary27,2014
C6 PL12‐0151 Constructionofanewpackingandprocessingfacility. 3.7 AwaitingpermitapplicationresubmittalasofApril2,2014.
City of Ventura D1 1900SVictoria–
GhittermanNew2storyofficebuilding. 3.3 Underconstructionasof
April1,2014.D2 AlliedBeverage
Company134,797squarefootwarehouseandmaintenancebuilding. 3.9 Underconstructionasof
April1,2014.D3 CMH–NewHospital Constructionofnewhospitalbuilding(320,000squarefeet
and230beds),newstreetextensions,anewpublicplaza,andnewarealandscaping.
4.3 UnderconstructionasofApril1,2014.
D4 CanneryRowLLC MixedUse–Condominiums/Commercial. 4.9 UnderconstructionasofApril1,2014.
D5 LogueFamily MixedUse–Condominiums/Commercial. 3.6 ApprovedonFebruary7,2012.
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐5 FINAL EIR
Table 6‐1 Cumulative Projects within Five Miles of the Proposed Project
Project Number Project Name Description of Project
Distance from Nearest Project Feature (mi) Project Status
D6 CastilloDelSol Affordablehousingforspecialneedsresidents,anon‐sitemanager’sunitandsupportiveservices.
4.4 ApprovedonJune26,2013
D7 ParklandsApartments
Apartmentswithcommunitybuilding. 1.5 ApprovedonSeptember5,2012
D8 HemlockApartments 23apartments. 4.7 ApprovedonMay11,2011.InplancheckasofAugust12,2013
D9 PROJ‐04691 7apartments 4.4 UnderconstructionasofApril1,2014.
D10 IslandViewApartments
154‐unitapartmentcomplex. 3.3 ApprovedonNovember19,2012
D11 EastVillageResidential
50‐unitlowincomeapartmentcomplex. 2.3 ApprovedonDecember10,2012
Southern California Edison E1 SantaClara‐Colonia
66‐kVSubtransmissionLineReconductorProject
Reconductorapproximately11milesof66‐kVsubtransmissionlinetocorrectapotentialN‐1conditionifexisting3rdpartygeneratorsdonotrenewtheircontracts.
0 Constructionanticipatedin2018.
E2 Moorpark‐SantaClaraNo.1&No.2220kV–M3‐T3
Repairorreplaceretainingwallin220kV(ROW). 2.8 ConstructioncompletedNovember2013
E3 SantaClara‐GoletaNo.1&No.2220kV–M2‐T1
Repairorreplaceretainingwallin220kVROW. 0 ConstructionanticipatedJuly–August2014
E4 SantaClara‐Wakefield#1ĊkV–M35‐T1
Repairorreplaceretainingwallin66kVROW. 3.5 ConstructiondateTBD.Mayoccurinlate2014or2015.
E5 DeterioratedPoleReplacementProgram(DPRP)
TheDeterioratedPoleReplacementProgramisanongoinginspectionandmaintenanceprogramthroughwhichdeterioratedwoodpolesareidentifiedforreplacementconsistentwithCPUCGeneralOrders95and165.
VariouslocationsinSantaBarbaraCountyandwithinthecitiesofSantaBarbara,CarpinteriaandGoleta.NearestislessthanonemilefromSegment4.
Ongoingpolereplacementactivitiesanticipatedtotakeplace2013‐2018.
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐6 FINAL EIR
Table 6‐1 Cumulative Projects within Five Miles of the Proposed Project
Project Number Project Name Description of Project
Distance from Nearest Project Feature (mi) Project Status
E6 TransmissionLineRatingandRemediation(TLRR)Program
TheTLRRProgramfocusisontheevaluationandremediationofspansonSCE’stransmissionsystemthatareinquestionofmeetingCPUCGO95clearancecriteria.Examplesofremediationworktypicallymayincluderelocatingdistributionlinesandstreetlightsfromundertransmissionlines,modifyingpoleheadconfigurationsortighteninginsulatorsorconductors,gradingunderlyingareastoremediateclearanceconcerns,modifyingorreplacingtowers/poles,orinstallingintersecttowers/poles.Withinthecumulativestudyareathereare14locationsthathavebeenidentifiedasworklocationsundertheprogram.
VariouslocationsinVenturaCounty.NearestislessthanonemilefromSantaClaraSubstationandSegment1.
Constructionanticipated2015‐2018.
E7 Carpinteria‐VenturaFiberOpticCableProject
InstallationofnewfiberopticcableprimarilyonexistingdistributionfacilitiesorundergroundprimarilyinexistingROWorfranchise.
0 Constructionanticipated4thQuarter2014.5duetopermittingdelaysandroutealternativesrequestedbyCaltrans.
E8 PastWorkinProjectArea
SubstationmodificationsatCarpinteria,Goleta,IslaVista,Ortega,andSantaClarasubstations.Newsubtransmissionstructuresand66kilovolts(kV)conductorwereinstalledinSegment1fromSantaClaraSubstationtoCasitasSubstation,andexisting66‐kVconductorwasremoved.Newsubtransmissionstructuresand66kVconductorwereinstalledinSegment2fromCasitasSubstationtothe‘Y’locatednearCasitasPassjustwestofLakeCasitasinVenturaCounty,andexisting66kVconductorwasremoved.Newsubtransmissionstructuresand66‐kVconductorswereinstalledinSegment3AfromCarpinteriaSubstationtotheSantaBarbara/VenturaCountyline,andexistingwoodsubtransmissionstructureswereremovedortopped.SubtransmissionstructuresinSegments1and2werepartiallyremoved.PartialworkwascompletedattheGettyTap.
0 Constructioncompletedbetween1999and2004
E9 EmergencyMaintenancealongCasitasPassRoad
EmergencyrepairstoreplacedamagedconductorandonewoodpolealongCasitasPassRoadduetoasmallelectricalfire.Lessthanhalfamileofconductorwasreplaced.
Segment3AalongCasitasPassRoad
Completedin2012
Sources:CityofCarpinteria2014;CityofVentura2014;CountyofSantaBarbara2012;CountyofVentura2014a,b,c,;SCE2014,FehrandPeersTransportationConsultants2007
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐7 FINAL EIR
Table 6‐1 Cumulative Projects within Five Miles of the Proposed Project
Project Number Project Name Description of Project
Distance from Nearest Project Feature (mi) Project Status
Key:CPUC=CaliforniaPublicUtilitiesCommission DPRP=DeterioratedPoleReplacementProgramkV=kilovolt SCE=SouthernCaliforniaEdisonTLRR=TransmissionLineRatingandRemediationProgram
\\prtbhp1\gis\SanFrancisco\SantaBarbaraCoReliability\Maps\MXDs\Report_Maps\Figure_Cumulative_Projects.mxd June 2014
!
!
Santa
Barb
ara C
o.
Los Padres National Forest
CARPINTERIA
ORTEGA
£¤150
£¤224
£¤192
Carpinteria
Montecito
Summerland
ToroCanyon ¬A1
¬A2
¬A3
¬A4
¬A5
¬A6
¬B1
¬B2
¬B3
¬B4
¬B5¬B6 ¬B7¬B8
¬B9
¬B10¬B11 ¬B13
¬C2
¬E1
Figure 61a Cumulative Projects
Santa Barbara CountyReliability Project
Santa Barbara andVentura Counties California
º 0 2Miles
AZ
CA
ID
NV
OR
UT
Existing ElectricalSubtransmission Lines
Segment 1Segment 2Segment 3ASegment 3B
!Existing SubstationLocations
!(G Getty TapLos Padres NationalForest (USFS)Major RoadsCounty Boundary
Bio Preserve AreasCoastal Commission Zone
!( Cumulative Projects
Segment 4Segment 5
\\prtbhp1\gis\SanFrancisco\SantaBarbaraCoReliability\Maps\MXDs\Report_Maps\Figure_Cumulative_Projects.mxd June 2014
!
L A K EL A K EC A S I T A SC A S I T A S
Los Padres National Forest
CASITAS£¤33
£¤150
£¤101
¬C2
¬E2
Figure 61b Cumulative Projects
Santa Barbara CountyReliability Project
Santa Barbara andVentura Counties California
º 0 2Miles
AZ
CA
ID
NV
OR
UT
Existing ElectricalSubtransmission Lines
Segment 1Segment 2Segment 3ASegment 3BSegment 4
!Existing SubstationLocations
!(G Getty TapLos Padres NationalForest (USFS)Major RoadsCounty Boundary
Bio Preserve AreasCoastal Commission Zone
!( Cumulative Projects
Segment 5
\\prtbhp1\gis\SanFrancisco\SantaBarbaraCoReliability\Maps\MXDs\Report_Maps\Figure_Cumulative_Projects.mxd June 2014
!
!
!
!
!(G
GETTY
SANTACLARA
CASITAS
VENTURA£¤126
£¤232
£¤118
£¤33
SantaPaula
SanBuenaventura
(Ventura)
OxnardEl Rio
¬D1
¬D4
¬C1
¬C3 ¬C4
¬C5
¬C6
¬D2
¬D3
¬D5
¬D6
¬D7
¬D8
¬D9
¬D10
¬D11
¬E2
¬E3
¬E4
¬E5
¬E7
¬E8
¬E9
Figure 61c Cumulative Projects
Santa Barbara CountyReliability Project
Santa Barbara andVentura Counties California
º 0 2Miles
AZ
CA
ID
NV
OR
UT
Existing ElectricalSubtransmission Lines
Segment 1Segment 2Segment 3ASegment 3BSegment 4
!Existing SubstationLocations
!(G Getty TapLos Padres NationalForest (USFS)Major RoadsCounty Boundary
Bio Preserve AreasCoastal Commission Zone
!( Cumulative Projects
Segment 5
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐11 FINAL EIR
6.1.2 Cumulative Scenario 12TheproposedprojectwouldbelocatedwithinthefoothillsoftheSantaYnezMountains,asub‐3rangeoftheTransverseRanges.Theproposedprojectwouldprimarilyoccupyexistingrights‐of‐4waycharacterizedbyopengrazinglands,orchards,greenhouses,low‐densityresidential5development,andchaparral‐coveredmountainslopes.Mostareasintheimmediatevicinityofthe6proposedprojectaresparselypopulated,withtheexceptionofthewesternportionsofSegments73Aand4,whichpassthroughresidentialareasattheedgeofsuburbanCarpinteria.Giventhe8remotelocationsofthemajorityoftheproposedprojectcomponents,thevastmajorityof9reasonablyforeseeableprojectswithinthe5‐milecumulativestudyareaarelocatedwithinthe10urbanareasinthevalleystothewest(i.e.,CityofCarpinteria)andsoutheast(i.e.,CityofVentura)of11theproposedproject.A5‐milecumulativestudyareawasusedtoidentifyreasonablyforeseeable12projectsbecauseitwassufficientlylargetocaptureadditionalprojectsthathavethepotentialto13contributetocumulativeimpactsandcapturedallofthevariouslandscapesandresourceareasthat14theprojecttransverses.1516Residential Projects 17
Anumberofresidentialprojectshavebeenproposedwithin5milesoftheproposedprojectinthe18citiesofCarpinteriaandVentura.Theseprojectsareinvariousstagesofdevelopment;somehave19beenpartiallyconstructed,andsomemaybeconstructedsimultaneouslywiththeproposedproject,20dependingonwhenpermitsareapproved.Allresidentialdevelopmentswouldhavethesametype21ofimpacts,suchastemporaryandpermanentincreasesintraffic,airemissions,andchangesinthe22visuallandscape.2324Commercial and Retail Developments 25
Theproposedprojectcomponentsarelocatedwithin5milesofnumerouscommercialandretail26developmentsinthecitiesofCarpinteriaandVentura.Theseprojectsareinvariousstagesof27development;twomixeduseprojectsintheCityofCarpinteriahavebeenapprovedthatinclude2885,000squarefeetofofficespaceanda6,000‐square‐footcommercialbuilding.WithintheCityof29Ventura,onemixeduseprojectandatwo‐storyofficebuildingprojectarecurrentlyunder30construction,andanothermixeduseprojecthasbeenapproved.Theseprojectswouldallresultin31similarimpacts,suchastemporaryandpermanentincreasesintraffic,airemissions,andchangesin32thevisuallandscape.3334Industrial Projects 35
AnumberofindustrialprojectsareinvariousstagesofdevelopmentwithinVenturaCountyandthe36CityofVentura.ThreeprojectsarecurrentlyawaitingpermitapplicationresubmittalinVentura37Countyincluding:aprojecttodevelopacontractorserviceyardon7.7acresofa22acreparcel,38conversionofanexistingcontractor’sserviceyardintoaClassIIOilfieldWasteDisposalFacility,39andconstructionofanewpackingandprocessingfacility.AnotherprojectinVenturaCounty,a406,000squarefootindustrialbuilding,iscurrentlyundergoingapplicationcompletenessreview.41WithintheCityofVentura,a134,797squarefootwarehouseandmaintenancebuildingiscurrently42underconstruction.Theseprojectswouldallresultinsimilarimpactsasthoseassociatedwith43residentialprojectsandcommercialandretaildevelopments:temporaryandpermanentincreases44intraffic,airemissions,andchangesinthevisuallandscape.4546
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐12 FINAL EIR
Agricultural Projects 1
Withinthecumulativestudyarea,fouragriculturalprojectsareinvariousstagesofdevelopment–2allwithinunincorporatedSantaBarbaraCounty.Applicationshavebeenfiledfora20,000square3footagriculturaldevelopmentandforacommercialhorsetraining,breeding,andboardingfacility.4Environmentalreviewhasnotyetbeencompletedforeitheroftheseprojects.Twoagricultural5projectshavebeenapproved:theCarpinteriaValleyFarmsProject,whichincludesadevelopment6planforbuildingsandstructuresinexcessof20,000squarefeet,andtheHolaniFarmsHorse7BoardingFacility,a20,805squarefootcommercialhorseboardingfacility.89Public Services Projects 10
Therearetworeasonablyforeseeablepublicservicesprojectswithinthecumulativestudyarea.11TheSummerlandCommunityPublicSafetyCenterwouldbelocatedinunincorporatedSanta12BarbaraCountyandincludesconstructionofanewfirestationandassociatedfacilities.13EnvironmentalreviewfortheprojectwascompletedinOctober2012,anditiscurrently14undergoingpermitcompliancereview.Anew320,000squarefoothospitaliscurrentlyunder15constructionintheCityofVentura.1617Infrastructure Projects 18
Infrastructureprojectswithinthecumulativestudyareaincludebridgereplacementprojects,road19widening,interchangeexpansion,androadextensionprojects,andnewwirelesscommunication20facilityprojects.Twooftheseprojects,theArroyoParidaBridgeReplacementProjectin21unincorporatedSantaBarbaraCountyandtheLindenAvenue‐CasitasPassInterchangesProjectin22theCityofCarpinteria,wouldinvolverelocationofSouthernCaliforniaEdison(SCE)23subtransmissionanddistributionlines.Inaddition,anumberofSCEprojectsarescheduledor24proposedtotakeplacewithinthecumulativestudyareaincluding:substationmodification25projects,reconductoringan11milesegmentofa66‐kVsubtransmissionline,repairorreplacement26ofretainingwallsinthreelocations,afiberopticcableproject,andthreeinfrastructure27replacement/remediationprograms.2829Substation Modification Projects 30
SCEisplanningsubstationmodificationsattheVentura,Casitas,Carpinteria,SanMiguel,andSanta31Clarasubstations.Constructionofthesemodificationsisanticipatedtotakeplacebetween201432and2017.Modificationsateachofthesubstationswouldtakeplacewithintheexistingsubstation33wallorfencewouldnotresultinanincreaseofthevoltageratingofanyofthesubstations.The34modificationsmayentailreplacementofbanksandmiscellaneousequipmentadditionsand35replacements.Theworktobeconductedateachofthesesubstationswouldoccurinareaswithno36publicviewpointandwouldhavenoimpactonanyresourceareas.Therefore,thesemodification37projectsarenotconsideredfurtherinthecumulativeimpactanalysis.3839Santa Clara‐Colonia 66‐kV Subtransmission Line Reconductor Project 40
TheSantaClara‐Colonia66‐kVSubtransmissionLineReconductorProjectwouldinvolvereplacing41theconductorsonanapproximately11milesegmentofa66‐kVsubtransmissionline.Construction42oftheprojectisanticipatedtobeginin2018.4344
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐13 FINAL EIR
Carpinteria‐Ventura Fiber Optic Cable Project 1
SCE’sEdisonCarrierSolutionshasproposedtheCarpinteria‐VenturaFiberOpticCableProjectto2improvethereliabilityoftheSCEcommunicationsnetworkbetweenVenturaandSantaBarbara.3Theprojectwouldinvolveinstallingnewfiberopticcable,primarilyonexistingdistribution4facilities.Inlocationswhereexistingdistributionpolesarenotavailable,thecablewouldbeplaced5inexistingornewundergroundconduit.Theundergroundingwouldoccurprimarilywithinexisting6publicrights‐of‐way.78Deteriorated Pole Replacement Program 9
TheDeterioratedPoleReplacementProgram(DPRP)isanongoinginspectionandmaintenance10programthroughwhichdeterioratedwoodpolesareidentifiedandreplacedtomeetsafety11requirements.Withinthecumulativestudyarea146woodpoleshavebeenidentifiedfor12replacement.Ongoingpolereplacementactivitiesareanticipatedtotakeplacebetween2013and132018.1415Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program 16
TheTransmissionLineRatingandRemediationProgram(TLRR)focusesonevaluatingand17remediatingspansofSCE’stransmissionsysteminordertomeetclearancecriteriaestablishedby18theCaliforniaPublicUtilitiesCommission(CPUC).Theremediationworkmayincluderelocating19distributionlinesandstreetlightsfromundertransmissionlines,modifyingpolehead20configurations,tighteninginsulatorsorconductors,gradingunderlyingareastoremediate21clearanceconcerns,modifyingorreplacingtowers/poles,orinstallingintersecttowers/poles.22Withinthecumulativestudyareathereare14locationsthathavebeenidentifiedasworklocations23undertheprogram.Theconstructionworkattheselocationsisanticipatedtooccurbetween201724and2018.2526Past Work in Project Area 27
AsdiscussedinChapter1,“Introduction,”SCEconductedthefollowingunpermittedactivitieson28Segments1,2,and3Aandseveralsurroundingsubstationsbetween1999and2004:29 30
Segment1/GettyTap31
‐ Fortylatticesteeltowers(LSTs)andonewoodH‐framestructurewereremoved,32althoughsomefoundationmaterialforthepreviousLSTswasnotremovedandremains33inplace.34
‐ Thirty‐seventubularsteelpoles(TSPs)and3LSTswereconstructedinlinewiththe35removedstructures.36
‐ Twocircuits,eachtotalingapproximately47,500feetinlength,of954stranded37aluminumconductor(SAC)wereinstalled,replacing653aluminumconductorsteel‐38reinforced(ACSR)conductor.39
‐ TwofootingsforTSPs,twolightweightsteel(LWS)H‐frames,oneLWSpole,andtwo40switchesattheGettyTaplocationwereinstalled,andtwowoodH‐framesandonewood41polewereremoved.42
Segment 2 43
‐ TwentyLSTswereremoved,althoughsomefoundationmaterialfortheLSTswasnot44removedandremainsinplace.45
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐14 FINAL EIR
‐ SixteenTSPsand2newLSTswereconstructedwithinthealignmentoftheremoved1structures.2
‐ Twocircuits,eachtotalingapproximately21,500feetinlength,of954SACwere3installed,replacing653ACSRconductor.4
Segment 3A 5
‐ Approximately32existingwoodpolesalongSegment3Awerenotreplaced;the6conditionofthesepoleswasdeterminedtobesufficienttosupportthenewconductor,7andtheonlyworkconductedonthesepoleswastheinstallationofnewconductor.8
‐ Forty‐ninenewLWSpoleswereinstalledtoreplaceapproximately49wood9subtransmissionpolesthatpreviouslysupported66kVfacilities.Workonthesepoles10includedtheinstallationofnewconductorandthetransferofdistributioncircuits.11
‐ Withrespecttothepre‐existing49woodsubtransmissionpoles,34ofthesewood12subtransmissionpoleswereremovedentirely,and15ofthewoodpoleswere‘topped’13byremovingtheupperportionofthepole,thusleavingshorterpolesinplaceonwhich1416kVdistributioncircuitsandthird‐partytelecommunicationsfacilitiesremain.15
‐ Approximately19,500feetofsingle‐circuit954SACwasinstalled,replacing653ACSR16conductor.17
‐ OneTSPwasinstalledattheeasternterminusofSegment3A;thisTSPreplacedan18existingwoodpole.19
‐ Approximatelyfivewoodguystubswithheightsbetween20and30feetwerereplaced20withfivenewwoodguystubswithheightsbetween25and40feet.21
22SubstationmodificationsatCarpinteriaSubstation,GoletaSubstation,IslaVistaSubstation,Ortega23Substation,andSantaClaraSubstationalsooccurredaspartofthepreviousworkperformedinthe24projectarea.25266.1.3 Resource Areas 27286.1.3.1 Aesthetics 2930Scope and Geographic Extent 31
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactstoaestheticsincludesanyprojectthatwouldcreate32impactssimilartothoseassociatedwiththeproposedproject,thatis,anyprojectthatwouldaffect33existingvisualcharacterorqualityinthevicinityoftheproposedprojectcomponents.The34geographicextentforconsideringcumulativeimpactstoaestheticsincludesallprojectswithin235milesoftheproposedprojectcomponents,whichisaconservativeestimateofthelikelymaximum36distancefromwhichprojectcomponentswouldbevisible,particularlyconsideringtheterrainof37theprojectarea.3839Existing Cumulative Conditions 40
Thelandscapesintheprojectcomponentareasarecharacterizedbychaparral‐coveredmountain41slopes,agriculturallanduses,andlowdensityresidentialdevelopment.TheviewshedofLake42CasitasandtheridgelinesandothersensitivelandscapefeaturessurroundingLakeCasitasarethe43
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐15 FINAL EIR
onlydesignatedscenicareasinthecumulativestudyarea.TherearenoDesignatedStateScenic1Highwaysintheprojectvicinity;however,SR150isanEligibleStateScenicHighway.23Cumulative Impact Analysis 4
Cumulativeprojectsthatarewithinthegeographicextentforcumulativeimpactsrelatedto5aestheticsincluderesidential,commercial,industrial,andinfrastructureprojects.However,thevast6majorityofprojectswithintwomilesoftheprojectcomponentsarelocatedwithintheCityof7Carpinteria.Neithertheprojectcomponentsthemselvesnorthereasonablyforeseeable8developmentprojectsinthisareadiffersubstantiallyfromsurroundinglanduses.910ThePastWorkinProjectArea(E8)alongSegments1,2,and3Aistheonlycumulativeproject11locatedoutsideoftheCityofCarpinteriabutwithinthesameviewshedastheproposedproject.12AlthoughthePastWorkintheProjectArearesultedinchangesinthevisualcharacterorquality13thatarevisibletosensitiveviewersintheShepardMesaareaandmotoristsandbicyclistsinthe14vicinity(Segment3A),theproposedprojectdoesnotcontributetothatimpact.Theproposed15projectincludesonlytheadditionoffaultreturnconductor,whichwouldnotresultinasignificant16visualimpactandthereforedoesnotcontributetotheexistinglong‐termvisualimpactthatresulted17fromthepastwork.AdiscussionofhowthePastWorkintheProjectArea(E8)alongSegment3A18resultedinsignificantlong‐termaestheticimpactsisincludedinChapter7.1920Becausetheproposedprojectdoesnotcontributetheexistingvisualimpact,constructionofthe21proposedprojectwouldnotresultinaconsiderablecontributiontocumulativeimpactson22aestheticresourcesintheprojectarea.23246.1.3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 2526Scope and Geographic Extent 27
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactstoagriculturalandforestryresourcesincludesany28projectthatwouldimpactstate‐designated,importantfarmland(PrimeFarmland,Unique29Farmland,and/orFarmlandofStatewideImportance),conflictwithexistingzoningfor,orcause30rezoningof,forestland,timberland,ortimberlandproductionzones,orresultinthelossofforest31land.ThegeographicextentforcumulativeimpactstoagricultureisSantaBarbaraandVentura32countiesbecausecumulativeimpactsonimportantfarmlandarerecordedatthecountylevel.As33discussedinSection4.2,“AgricultureandForestryResources,”theproposedprojectwouldnot34conflictwithexistingzoningforforestland,landzonedfortimberlandproduction,orresultinthe35lossorconversionofforestlandtonon‐forestuse.Therefore,potentialcumulativeimpactson36forestryresourcesarenotdiscussedfurtherinthissection.3738Existing Cumulative Conditions 39
InSantaBarbaraandVenturaCounties,urbanandsuburbanusescanencroachonfarmland,40resultinginalossofimportantfarmlandwhenlandwithagriculturalusesordesignationis41convertedtoresidential,commercial,industrial,andotherdevelopment.Urbanencroachmenton42farmlandcanalsoresultinindirectimpacts,includingrestrictionsontypicalfarmactivities,suchas43heavyequipmentoperation,andreductionsintheproductivityofcropsrelatedtoairquality44impacts.4546Approximately12percentofthetotalacreageofSantaBarbaraCounty(125,112acres)and2047percentofthetotalacreageofVenturaCounty(119,683acres)isclassifiedasPrimeFarmland,48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐16 FINAL EIR
FarmlandofStatewideImportance,UniqueFarmland,orFarmlandofLocalImportance(Important1Farmland)(CDC2010a,2010b).23Cumulative Impact Analysis 4
AlthoughsomeongoingdevelopmentinSantaBarbaraandVenturaCountieswouldresultin5impactsonfarmlandandlanddesignatedforagriculturaluses,thistypeofdevelopmenttendsto6occuradjacenttoornearareasdevelopedwithurban,suburban,andothernon‐agriculturaluses,or7asurbaninfill.ThePastWorkinProjectArea(E8) resulted in one structure on active Unique 8Farmland in the Shepard Mesa area. The structure is immediately adjacent to the new LWS 9pole within the right-of-way (ROW). Therefore, the placement of the new LWS pole resulted in 10less than 0.001 acres of long-term disturbance on Unique Farmland. The placement of new 11TSPs in Segments 1 and 2 resulted in less than 0.007 acres of long-term disturbance to 12Grazing Land. Moreover,SantaBarbaraandVenturaCountiesimplementpoliciestoaddress13potentialimpactsonagriculturalusesintheirGeneralPlans,includingpoliciestoprotectfarmland14andreviewdevelopmentinruralareasthatcouldimpactagriculturaluses.Therefore,anyimpact15fromthecumulativeprojectsonagriculturalresourceswithintheareaofcumulativeeffectwould16belessthansignificant.1718WorkinSegments3A,3B,and4oftheproposedprojectwouldtemporarilydisturbupto28acresof19UniqueFarmlandand3.7acresofPrimeFarmland.Attheconclusionofconstruction,themajority20ofthedisturbedareaswouldbereturnedtoasclosetopre‐constructionconditionsasfeasible,orto21conditionsagreeduponbythelandownerandSCE.Constructionandoperationoftheprojectwould22resultinthepermanentconversionofapproximately12.30acresoflandsidentifiedasimportant23farmland,whichrepresentsalossof0.005percentoftheImportantFarmlandsinventoryinSanta24BarbaraandVenturaCounties.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinaconsiderable25contributiontocumulativeimpactsonstate‐designatedimportantfarmlandSantaBarbaraand26VenturaCounties.27286.1.3.3 Air Quality 2930Scope and Geographic Extent 31
Projectsincludedinthecumulativeanalysisforairqualityimpactsarelimitedtoexistingand32reasonablyforeseeableprojectswithin5milesoftheproposedprojectcomponents.3334Existing Cumulative Conditions 35
Existingsourcesofairpollutantsinthecumulativestudyarea(SantaBarbaraCountyandVentura36counties)includecommercialandindustrialareasources,non‐roadmobilesources(e.g.,off‐37highwayequipment),on‐roadmobilesources,andaircraftemissions.Theproposedprojectisinan38areaunderthejurisdictionoftheSantaBarbaraCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict(SBCAPCD)39andtheVenturaCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict(VCAPCD)andislocatedwithintheSouth40CentralCoastAirBasin.Theportionoftheairbasinwheretheproposedprojectwouldbelocatedis41designatedasnonattainmentforozoneandPM10withrespecttoNationalAmbientAirQuality42StandardsandCaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.4344Cumulative Impact Analysis 45
CumulativeprojectsidentifiedinTable6‐1wouldcontributetocumulativeairemissions.The46contributionofadditionalemissionsofozoneprecursors(i.e.,NOx,CO,andReactiveOrganicGases47[ROGs]),PM2.5andPM10couldresultinasignificantimpacttoairquality.However,likethe48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐17 FINAL EIR
proposedproject,cumulativeprojectswouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicableVCAPCDand1SBCAPCDregulations,aswellaswithadditionalcounty‐specificrequirementstomitigateimpacts2associatedwithconstructionemissions.34AsdescribedinSection4.3,“AirQuality,”theCPUChasoptedtousetheSouthCoastAirQuality5ManagementDistrict(SCAQMD)AirQualitySignificanceThresholdsforConstructionforthe6purposeofthisEIRanalysisduetotheabsenceofquantitativethresholdsofsignificanceforshort‐7termconstructionemissionsfromSBCAPCDandVCAPCD.AftertheimplementationofVCAPCDand8SBCAPCDregulations(APMAQ‐1andAPMAQ‐2)andMMAQ‐1,theproposedprojectwould9nonethelessresultinsignificantROG,NOx,PM2.5,andPM10emissionsduringthefirstyearof10construction.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldresultinacumulativelyconsiderableimpactin11relationtoairqualityduringthefirstyearofconstruction.1213Duringthesecondyearofconstruction,ROG,NOx,PM2.5,andPM10emissionswouldbewellbelow14SCAQMDconstructionthreshold(Table4.3‐12).Theproposedprojectwouldbeconsistentwith15VCAPCDandSBCAPCDairqualityplans.Thereforecumulativelyconsiderableimpactsinrelationto16airqualitywouldnotoccurduringthesecondyearofconstruction.1718Operationoftheproposedprojectwouldnotdifferinscopeorscalefromcurrentoperationsand19maintenanceactivitiesalongthe66kVsubtransmissionlinesoratthesubstations.Theemissions20associatedwithcurrentandfutureprojectoperationswouldrepresentaverysmallfractionofthe21regionalemissioninventoriesandwouldnotbecontributetoanycumulativelyconsiderable22impactstoairquality.23246.1.3.4 Biological Resources 2526Scope and Geographic Extent 27
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactsonbiologicalresourcesincludescumulativeprojects28thatcouldhaveanadverseeffectonspecialstatusspecies,U.S.FishandWildlifeService(USFWS)‐29designatedcriticalhabitat,wetlandsandriparianareas,andsensitivevegetationcommunitiesas30discussedinSection4.4,“BiologicalResources.”Thegeographicextentforconsideringproject‐31relatedcumulativeimpactsonbiologicalresourcesincludesprojectswithin5‐milesofproposed32projectcomponentsbecausethisdistanceencompassesareasonablerepresentativerangefor33populationsofthesensitivespecies,suchasnestingbirds,identifiedintheindividualimpact34analysisfortheproposedproject.3536Existing Cumulative Conditions 37
Mostareasintheimmediatevicinityoftheproposedprojectaresparselypopulated,withthe38exceptionofthewesternportionsofSegments3Aand4,whichpassthroughresidentialareasatthe39edgeofsuburbanCarpinteria.Theareasurroundingtheprojectareaincludesvariousnativecoastal,40chaparral,andwoodlandvegetationtypes.Numerouswildlifespeciesareknownoccurwithinthe41projectvicinity,includingfish,reptile,amphibian,bird,andmammalspecies.4243Cumulative Impact Analysis 44
ThemajorityofthecumulativeprojectslistedinTable6‐1areplannedtobeconstructedin45disturbedurbanareasinthelowerelevationsonthecoastalplain.Mostoftheseprojectsare46residentialorcommercial/retailprojects,typicalofurbaninfilldevelopment,atlowerelevationson47thecoastalplainandarethereforelesslikelytoimpactspecialstatusplantandwildlifespecies.48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐18 FINAL EIR
Withintheimmediatevicinity(lessthan0.5miles)oftheproposedprojectcomponents,allbuttwo1ofthecumulativeprojectsareotherutility‐relatedprojects(e.g.,installingfiberopticcables,2repairingretainingwalls,replacingdeteriorateddistributionsystempoles)plannedbySCE.34ThePreviousWorkPerformedinProjectArea(E8)couldhaveimpactedsimilarbiological5resourcesastheproposedprojectalongSegments1,2,and3A.ThePreviousWorkPerformedin6ProjectArearesultedinlessthanoneacreoflong‐termdisturbancealongSegment3A.This7segmentdoesnotcontainhighqualityhabitatforspecialstatusspecies.Muchofthelandalong8Segment1hasbeenhistoricallyusedforgrazingactivitiesandisconsistentlydisturbed.Theaccess9roadpreviouslyusedforconstructioncrossesCañadaLargastreamanddoesnotcontainacrossing10structure. This stream contains special status species and is designated critical habitat for 11Southern California steelhead (Oncorhynchusmykissirideus). Segment2ispredominantly12CaliforniacoastalliveoakwoodlandandhasmoredensetreecoveragethanSegments1and3A.13Segment2sharesaROWwithandislocatedbetweentwoexistingtransmissionlines,soitis14assumedthattheareaintheimmediatevicinityoftheSegment2towerswasalreadydisturbedat15thetimeofconstructionduetooperationsandmaintenanceactivitieswithintheROW.1617Constructionoftheproposedprojectcouldaffectseveralspecialstatusplantandwildlifespecies.18Theproposedprojectwouldalsoberequiredtocomplywithallapplicablelawsandregulations19relatedtospecialstatusplantandwildlifespecies.Moreover,theproposedprojectwould20implementAPMsandmitigationmeasures,asdescribedinSection4.4,“BiologicalResources,”to21ensurethatimpactstospecialstatusplantsandwildlifearelessthansignificant.Duetothephysical22distancebetweencumulativeprojectconstructionsites,andtheshort‐termnatureofconstruction23activities,theproposedproject’scontributiontoanycumulativeimpactsrelatedtospecialstatus24plantandwildlifewouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderable.2526ProjectconstructioncouldaffectriparianhabitatsinSegment4asaresultofwaterbodycrossings.27CumulativeprojectsinvolvingwaterwaycrossingsincludetheArroyoParidaBridgeReplacement28Project(A6)inSantaBarbaraCounty,theCarpinteriaValleyWaterDistrictWaterStorageTank29Project(B12)andRestorationofCarpinteriaCreek(B14)intheCityofCarpinteria,andSCE’s30PreviousWorkPerformedinProjectArea(E8).However,theproposedprojectandallcumulative31projectswouldberequiredtocomplywithCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildliferegulations32andpermitsregardingstreambedalteration.Therefore,theproposedproject’scontributiontoany33cumulativeimpactsrelatedtoriparianhabitatswouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderable.3435ConstructionandoperationoftheProjectwouldhavelessthansignificantimpactsonspecialstatus36naturalcommunities,includingSouthernCaliforniaBlackWalnutWoodlandandSouthernCoast37LiveOakRiparianForest,afterincorporationofAPMsandmitigationmeasuresasdescribedin38Section4.4,“BiologicalResources.”WorkwouldcomplywithVenturaCountyandSantaBarbara39Countytreeordinancesandapplicablepermits.Cumulativeprojectswouldberequiredtocomply40withlocaltreeordinancesaswell.Therefore,theproposedproject’scontributiontoanycumulative41impactsrelatedtospecialstatusnaturalcommunitieswouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderable.4243ProjectconstructionandoperationcouldhavedirectimpactsonwetlandsasdefinedbySection40444oftheCleanWaterActasaresultofaccessroadconstruction,rehabilitation,andmaintenance.45HowevertheprojectwouldberequiredtocomplywithallapplicablesectionsoftheCleanWater46ActaswellaswithStateandlocalstreambedandstormwaterregulationsandapplicablepermit47conditions.Otherprojectsinthecumulativescenariowouldalsoberequiredtocomplywith48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐19 FINAL EIR
applicablelaws,regulations,andpermitconditions.Therefore,theproposedproject’scontribution1toanycumulativeimpactsrelatedtowetlandswouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderable.23Constructionandoperationactivitiesmayresultintemporarychangesinwildlifemovementdueto4constructionnoiseandhumanpresence.However,theseimpactswouldbelocalized,temporary,5andlessthansignificant.AllofthecumulativeprojectslistedinTable6‐1wouldhavelocalized6footprintsandwouldalsonotbeexpectedtoaffectspeciesmigration.Forexample,nonew7highways,levees,orothermajorinfrastructureisplanned.Therefore,theproposedproject’s8contributiontoanycumulativeimpactsrelatedtochangesinwildlifemovementwouldnotbe9cumulativelyconsiderable.1011AfterimplementationofAPMsandmitigationmeasures,asdescribedinSection4.4,“Biological12Resources,”constructionandoperationoftheproposedprojectwouldnotconflictwithanylocal13policiesorordinancesprotectingbiologicalresources,includingtrees.Liketheproposedproject,14cumulativeprojectswouldbeexpectedtocomplywithallapplicablelaws,ordinances,regulations,15andtheconditionsofapplicablepermits.Moreover,project‐relatedimpactsassociatedwithtree16trimmingorremovalwouldbelocalized,andwouldnotoverlapwithimpactsassociatedwithany17cumulativeproject.Therefore,theproposedproject’scontributiontoanycumulativeimpacts18relatedtolocalpoliciesorordinancesprotectingbiologicalresourceswouldnotbecumulatively19considerable.2021NoHabitatConservationPlans,NaturalCommunityConservationPlans,orotherapprovedlocal,22regional,orStatehabitatconservationplansexistfortheproposedprojectarea.Therefore,the23proposedprojectwouldnotcontributetoacumulativeimpactinvolvingconflictswithadopted24naturalresourceplans.25266.1.3.5 Cultural and Paleontological Resources 2728Scope and Geographic Extent 29
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactsonculturalandpaleontologicalresourcesincludes30projectsthatwouldpotentiallydisturbunidentifiedsubsurfacehumanremainsorhistoric,31archaeological,orpaleontologicalresourcesthroughgrounddisturbance,asthesewerethetypeof32potentialimpactsidentifiedfortheproposedproject.Noidentifiedculturalorpaleontological33resourceswouldbeimpactedbytheproposedproject.Therefore,thegeographicextentofthe34analysisofcumulativeimpactsonculturalresourcesislimitedtoconstructionimpactson35previouslyunidentifiedculturalandpaleontologicalresourcesthatcouldoccurasaresultofthe36proposedproject,andwherethesameunidentifiedresourcescouldalsobeaffectedbyconstruction37ofotherprojects(i.e.,withinthefootprintoftheproposedprojectandwithinapproximately10038feetofthisfootprint).3940Existing Cumulative Conditions 41
Themajorityofprojectsinthecumulativescenarioarelocatedinoraroundthedisturbedurban42areasonthecoastalplain.Ground‐disturbingactivities,suchasthosethatwouldtakeplaceaspart43oftheproposedproject,coulddisturbunknownculturalandpaleontologicalresources.However,44mostoftheseprojectsarelocatedmorethan100feetawayfromtheproposedprojectfootprintand45donothavethepotentialtoimpactthesameunidentifiedculturalresourcesastheproposed46project.SCE’sPreviousWorkPerformedinProjectArea(E8)iswithinthegeographicextentfor47cumulativeimpacts.However,noculturalresourceswerereportedtobedamagedfromground‐48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐20 FINAL EIR
disturbanceactivities.TherearefivereasonablyforeseeableSCEprojectsthathavethepotentialto1impactthesameunidentifiedresourcesastheproposedproject:SantaClara‐Colonia66kV2SubtransmissionLineReconductorProject(E1),repairorreplacementofanexistingretainingwall3(E3),theDPRP(E5),theTLRR(E6),andtheCarpinteria‐VenturaFiberOpticCableProject(E7).45Cumulative Impact Analysis 6
AsdiscussedinSection4.5,“CulturalResources,”theproposedprojectcoulddisturbunknown7subsurfacehumanremainsorhistoric,archaeological,orpaleontologicalresourcesthrough8excavationandgrounddisturbance.Severalotherprojectsinthecumulativescenariocouldtake9placeinthesamelocationorwithin100feetoftheproposedprojectcomponents;thereissome10potentialthattheproposedprojectandanotherprojectcouldaffectthesameunknownresourceor11resultincumulativelysignificantimpactsonunknownresources.However,itisreasonableto12assumethat,similartotheproposedproject,potentialimpactsonunknownculturalor13paleontologicalresourcesassociatedwithotherprojectsintheimmediatevicinity,aswellaswith14otherdevelopmentprojectsinthearea,wouldbeappropriatelymitigatedbyconstruction15monitoringandotherstandardmitigationmeasures(includingrecordation,avoidance,and16relocation),asappropriate.NumerousCalifornialawsandpolicies,aswellasSantaBarbaraand17VenturaCountypolicies,areinplacethatrequiremeasurestoavoid,reduce,orminimizeimpactsto18culturalandpaleontologicalresources.Moreover,allofthereasonablyforeseeableprojectsinthe19vicinityoftheproposedprojectareotherSCEprojectsandwouldbesubjecttoSCE’sstandardbest20managementpracticesfordealingwithunanticipatedculturalorpaleontologicalresource21discoveries(e.g.,SCE’sCulturalResourcesUnanticipatedDiscoveryPlan).Therefore,thetotal22impactofdevelopmentprojectsonunknownculturalresourceswithintheculturalresources23cumulativestudyarea(i.e.,within100feetoftheproposedprojectfootprint)wouldnotresulttobe24cumulativelyconsiderable.25266.1.3.6 Geology, Soils, and Mineral Resources 2728Scope and Geographic Extent 29
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactsongeology,soils,andmineralresourcesincludes30projectsthathavethepotentialtoexposepeopleorstructurestopotentialsubstantialadverse31effects,includingtheriskofloss,injury,ordeathinvolvingruptureofaknownearthquakefault,32strongseismicgroundshaking,orseismic‐relatedgroundfailure,includingliquefaction;projects33thatwouldresultinsubstantialsoilerosionorthelossoftopsoil;projectsthatwouldbelocatedon34ageologicunitorsoilthatisunstable,orthatwouldbecomeunstableasaresultoftheproposed35project,andpotentiallyresultinanonsiteoroffsitelandslide,lateralspreading,subsidence,36liquefaction,orcollapse;orprojectsthatwouldbelocatedonexpansivesoil,creatingsubstantial37riskstolifeorproperty.Thegeographicextentforconsideringcumulativeimpactstogeology,soils,38andmineralsisa0.5‐mileradiusfromthefootprintoftheproposedprojectcomponentsbecause39geologichazardsaregenerallydependentonlocalizedgeologicandsoilconditions.Asdiscussedin40Section4.6,“Geology,Soil,andMineralResources,”theproposedprojectwouldhavenoimpacton41mineralresources.Therefore,potentialcumulativeimpactsonmineralresourcesarenotdiscussed42furtherinthissection.4344Existing Cumulative Conditions 45
Theproposedprojectcomponents,andprojectsinthecumulativescenariothatarewithinthe46geographicextentforconsideringcumulativeimpactsrelatedtogeologyandsoils,arelocated47withinaseismicallyactiveareaincloseproximitytoanumberofactiveandpotentiallyactivefaults.48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐21 FINAL EIR
Areasinthecumulativestudyareaforgeologyandsoilresourcesrangefromlow‐lyingareas,with1potentialforliquefaction,toareaswithruggedtopography,steepslopes,andunstablebedrockwith2potentialforsoilerosionandlandslides.Inadditionsomeofthesoilsintheareahaveaveryhigh3potentialforerosion.45Projectswithinthegeographicextentforconsideringcumulativeimpactsrelatedtogeologyand6soilsincludeaprojectthatwouldinvolvetheeradicationofnoxiousweedsalongRinconCreekand7severalotherplannedSCEprojectsincluding:theSantaClara‐Colonia66‐kVSubtransmissionLine8ReconductorProject(E1),repairorreplacementofanexistingretainingwall(E2throughE4),the9DPRP(E5),theTLRR(E6),theCarpinteria‐VenturaFiberOpticCableProject,andSCE’sPastWork10intheProjectArea(E8).1112Cumulative Impact Analysis 13
AsdiscussedinSection4.6,“Geology,Soils,andMineralResources,”theproposedproject14componentareasarelocatedinaseismicallyactiveregionandactivefaultsintheareaarecapable15ofcausingdamagetoproposedprojectstructures.Inaddition,thereisthepotentialforsoil16instability‐relatedimpactssuchassoilerosion,landslides,andliquefaction.Theproposedproject17wouldresultinthereplacementofolderstructuresthataremoresusceptibletoseismiceventsand18relocatingorremovingsubtransmissionstructuresthatareinareassusceptibletolandslides.The19areasoftheproposedprojectmostsusceptibletolandslidesarethehigherelevationareas,which20tendtobesparselypopulated.Areaswithpotentialforliquefactionpotentialwouldbeavoidedor21projectcomponentswouldbedesignedtominimizethepotentialforliquefactionandincorporate22groundimprovementsinliquefiablezones.Furthermore,implementationofAPMsandmitigation23measures,implementationoferosionandsedimentationcontrolmeasuresrequiredinthe24StormwaterPollutionPreventionPlan(SWPPP),andtheapplicationofappropriateandrequired25engineeringdesign,includingcompliancewithcurrentbuildingcodesandregulationsasrequired26bylocaljurisdictions,wouldreduceanypotentialimpactsrelatedtogeologyandsoilstoalessthan27significantlevel.2829Similartotheproposedproject,anynewdevelopmentintheregionwouldalsoberequiredtobe30constructedinaseismicallysoundmanner,incompliancewiththeCaliforniaBuildingCodeand31applicablelocalregulations.Projectsthatwouldresultinmorethanoneacreofgrounddisturbance32wouldalsoberequiredprepareaSWPPPaspartofcomplyingwiththeNationalPollutionDischarge33EliminationSystemConstructionStormwaterGeneralPermit,whichwouldreducethepotentialfor34soilerosionandlossoftopsoil.Thecumulativeprojectswouldincludeappropriategeotechnical35engineering,designmeasures,andBMPsthatwouldreduceanypotentialimpactsrelatedtogeology36andsoilstoalessthansignificantlevel.3738Therefore,anycumulativeimpactrelatedtogeologyandsoilswouldbelessthansignificant,and39theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinaconsiderablecontributiontocumulativeimpactsrelated40togeologyandsoils.41426.1.3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 4344Scope and Geographic Extent 45
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactsrelatedtoemissionsofgreenhousegases(GHGs)46includesprojectsthathavethepotentialtogenerateGHGemissionsduringconstructionor47operation.BecauseimpactsrelatedtoGHGemissionsareinherentlyglobalinnature(thoughthey48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐22 FINAL EIR
tendtoberegulatedonaregionalorstatelevel),thegeographicextentforconsideringcumulative1impactsrelatedtoGHGsislikewiseglobal.23Existing Cumulative Conditions 4
Regionalandglobaldevelopmentpatternscontinuetorelyonmethodsandpracticesthat5contributelargevolumesofGHGstotheatmosphere,andimpactsrelatedtoGHGshavewidespread6andpotentiallyharmfulconsequences.TheincreaseinGHGsintheatmosphere,causedinlargepart7byhumanactivity,isnowconsideredoneofthekeycausesofglobalclimatechange.Current8scientificresearchindicatesthatpotentialeffectsofclimatechangeincludevariationsin9temperatureandprecipitation,sea‐levelrise,impactsonbiodiversityandhabitat,impactson10agricultureandforestry,andhumanhealthandsocialimpacts(CNRA2009).Asdescribedinthe11state’sClimateChangeScopingPlanof2008(CARB2008),GHGsourcesinthestatecollectively12resultinemissionsthatarehigherthanthetargetsestablishedbyAssemblyBill32,whichindicates13thatGHGemissionsinthestatecontinuetocontributetoatotalsignificant,state‐widecumulative14impact.1516AllprojectsincludedinthecumulativescenariowouldgenerateGHGsduringconstruction17(equipmentemissions)andoperations(increasedtraffictripstonewdevelopment).1819Cumulative Impact Analysis 20
The CEQA Guidelines include provisions for assessing the cumulative impacts of projects with GHG 21emissions. According to the guidelines, the lead agency “may determine that a project’s incremental 22contribution to a cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the 23requirements in a previously approved plan or mitigation program (including, but not limited to, … plans 24or regulations for the reduction of GHG emissions) which provides specific requirements that will avoid 25or substantially lessen the cumulative problem” (Section 15064[h][3]). According to this section, if an 26adopted plan or program adequately addresses cumulative GHG emissions and would apply to proposed 27development, the determination may be made that the development would not result in a cumulatively 28considerable impact, as long as the plan or mitigation program being relied upon imposes requirements 29that adequately address cumulative GHG emissions. In addition, in order to appropriately determine and 30mitigate GHG impacts, the plan or mitigation program must provide specific requirements that will avoid 31or substantially lessen the cumulative impact, must be specified in law or adopted through a public review 32process, and must be enforceable. 33 34TheproposedprojectwouldgeneratedirectemissionsofGHGsfromequipment/vehicleusage35duringconstructionandoperationandfrompotentialsulfurhexafluoride(SF6)leakagefrom36electricalequipment.TheSantaBarbaraCountyAirPollutionControlDistricthasnotestablished37significancecriteriaforGHGemissions(SBCAPCD2011).TheVenturaCountyAirPollutionControl38District(VCAPCD)isconsideringatieredapproachtoassessingGHGemissionswiththemain39componentsinvolvingconsistencywithalocallyadoptedGHGreductionplan,followedbyabright‐40linethresholdforsomeprojects(VCAPCD2011).GiventhattheVCAPCDhasnotyetformally41adoptedGHGemissionsthresholds,theyarecurrentlydeferringtotheinterimsignificance42thresholdsestablishedbytheSouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict(theadjacentairquality43jurisdiction).ThenetGHGemissionchangeassociatedwithconstructionoftheproposedproject44wouldbelessthantheSCAQMDinterimGHGsignificancethresholdof10,000metrictonsofcarbon45dioxideequivalency(CO2e)peryear.Itisestimatedthattheproposedprojectwouldresultinan46increaseof8,458metrictonsofCO2eduringconstructionandthatoperationalemissionswould47remainunchanged,asdiscussedinSection4.7,“GreenhouseGasEmissions.”48 49
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐23 FINAL EIR
ThetotalimpactofdevelopmentprojectsrelatedtoGHGswithincumulativestudyareawouldbe1significant.However,theproposedprojectwouldincludeAPMs,airqualityandlocalagencypermit2conditions,andmitigationmeasuresthatwouldaddressandreducethegenerationofGHGsduring3construction,andprojectconstructionemissionswouldbewellbelowSCAQMD’sinterimGHG4significancethresholdof10,000metrictonsofCO2eperyear.Inaddition,projectoperationwould5notresultinanychangestoGHGemissionsfromcurrentlevels.Althoughtheoverallcumulative6contextforGHGemissionsinthestateindicatesasignificanttotalcumulativeimpact,theproposed7projectwouldnotresultinaconsiderablecontributiontocumulativeimpactsrelatedtoGHGs.896.1.3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 1011Scope and Geographic Extent 12
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactsrelatedtohazardsandhazardousmaterialsincludes13anyprojectthatwouldhavethepotentialtocauseanaccidentalreleasetothepublicor14environmentduringtransport,use,ordisposalofhazardousmaterials,anyprojectthatwould15potentiallyexposesensitivereceptorstoanaccidentalreleaseofhazardousmaterials,andany16projectthatcouldexposepeopleorstructurestoasignificantriskofloss,injury,ordeathinvolving17wildlandfires.Thegeographicextentforconsideringproject‐relatedcumulativeimpactsrelatedto18hazardsandhazardousmaterialswouldbeprojectswithin5milesoftheproposedproject19componentsbecausethisdistancecapturesmostoftheareaofthesub‐watershedsthattheproject20crosses(includingallofthedowngradientdrainagesthatcouldbeimpactedbytheproposed21project)andincludesareassubjecttowildlandfires.2223Theproposedprojectwouldnotbeconstructedoroperatedonorwithin1,000feetofanysitelisted24ashazardousmaterialssitepursuanttoStateofCaliforniaGovernmentCodeSection65962.5(i.e.,25the“CorteseList”),withinanairportlanduseplanarea,orwithin2milesofapublicairport,public26useairport,orprivateairstrip.Theproposedprojectwouldalsonotinterferewithanadopted27emergencyresponseplanoremergencyevacuationplan.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnot28contributetoanycumulativeimpactsrelatedtohazardousmaterialssites,safetyhazardsrelatedto29peopleresidingand/orworkinginornearairports,orinterferewithanadoptedemergency30responseorevacuationplan.3132Existing Cumulative Conditions 33
Constructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeproposedprojectwouldinvolvetransport,use,and34disposalofhazardousmaterials.Thiswouldincludetheuseofhazardousmaterialstypicallyused35byconstructionvehiclesandheavyequipment(e.g.,gasoline,dieselfuel,transmissionfluid,brake36fluid,hydraulicfluid,solvents,motoroils,andlubricatinggrease).Mostoftheprojectsinthe37cumulativescenariowouldalsorequiretheuseofvehicleandheavymachineryandwouldlikewise38requiretheuseofhazardousmaterials.Inadditiontothesetypicalhazardousmaterials,the39proposedprojectwouldalsorequiretheuseofotherhazardousmaterialsincluding:welding40materials,propane,cannedspraypaint,paintthinner,batteryacid,andinsectrepellent,albeitona41temporarybasisduringconstruction.Alloftheprojectsinthecumulativescenariointheimmediate42vicinityoftheproposedprojectcomponentsareotherSCEprojectsthatareofasimilartypeasthe43proposedproject(e.g.,subtransmissionlinereconductoring,installinganewfiberopticcable,44replacingdeterioratedwoodpoles,modifyingorreplacingstructures,relocatingdistributionlines,45etc.),andmaylikewiserequiretheuseofsimilaradditionalhazardousmaterialsonatemporary46basis.SCE’sPreviousWorkPerformedinProjectArea(E8)iswithinthegeographicextentfor47cumulativeimpacts.However,impactsfromhazardousmaterialswerereported.48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐24 FINAL EIR
1Therearefourschoolswithin0.25milesofproposedprojectcomponents,allwithintheCityof2Carpinteria.However,onlythreeoftheschoolshavearewithin0.25milesofotherprojectsinthe3cumulativescenario(inadditiontotheproposedproject).CarpinteriaHighSchoolisadjacenttothe4CarpinteriaSubstationandSegment4oftheproposedprojectandisalsolessthan0.25milesfrom5theCarpinteria‐VenturaFiberOpticCableProject.CanalinoElementarySchoolis0.22milessouthof6Segment3Aandlessthan0.25milesfromtheCarpinteria‐VenturaFiberOpticCableProjectandthe7LindenAve–CasitasPassInterchangesProject.HowardCardenSchoolis0.03milessouthof8Segment3Aandlessthanlessthan0.25milessouthoftheCarpinteria‐VenturaFiberOpticCable9Project.1011MuchofthecumulativestudyareaoverlapswithareasthathavebeenidentifiedbyCALFIREas12VeryHighFireHazardSeverityZones(seeFigure4.8‐1)duetoflammablenativevegetation,dry13weatherconditions,andhighwinds.However,mostoftheprojectsinthecumulativescenarioare14plannedatlowerelevationsonthecoastalplainindisturbedurbanareasandwouldbeunlikelyto15poseasignificantriskofignitingvegetation.1617Cumulative Impact Analysis 18
AsdiscussedinSection4.8,“HazardsandHazardousMaterials,”projectconstructionwouldresult19inlessthansignificantimpactsassociatedwiththetransport,use,disposal,orforeseeableupsetof,20oraccidentsinvolvinghazardousmaterialsduringconstruction.Theapplicantwouldcomplywith21allapplicablelawsandregulationsregardingroutinetransport,use,ordisposalofhazardous22materials.TheapplicantwouldalsoimplementAPMs,plans,andmeasuresaddressingsafetyand23hazardousmaterials.Althoughthereispotentialforanaccidentalreleaseofhazardousmaterials24fromtheproposedprojectandotherprojectsinthecumulativescenariotocontributetoa25cumulativelyconsiderableimpactrelatedtotheaccidentalreleaseofhazardousmaterialsintothe26environment,especiallyifthehazardousmaterialsweretransportedoffsiteinwaterorair,projects27inthecumulativescenariowouldalsoberequiredtoimplementBMPsandadheretoallapplicable28lawsandregulationsassociatedwithhazardousmaterials.Therefore,theproposedproject’s29potentialtocontributetocumulativeimpactsrelatedtohazardousmaterialswouldbelessthan30considerable.3132Threeschoolsarewithin0.25milesoftheproposedprojectandotherprojectsinthecumulative33scenario.Constructionoftheproposedprojectwouldinvolvethelimitedtransportofhazardous34liquids(e.g.,gasoline,solvents,andlubricatingfluids),whicharecommonlyusedduring35constructionactivitiesassociatedwithcommercial,residential,andindustrialprojects.Compliance36withfederal,state,andlocalregulations,aswellasimplementationofAPMGEN‐1,whichrequires37thatallproposedprojectworkersreceivetrainingthatincludessafetyelementsandinstructionsfor38dealingwithhazardousmaterials,wouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtohazardousmaterialsand39schoolsarelessthansignificant.Otherprojectsinthecumulativescenariowouldalsoberequiredto40complywithapplicablefederal,state,andlocalregulationsrelatedtothetransportanduseof41hazardousmaterials.Therefore,theproposedproject’scontributiontocumulativeimpactsrelated42tohazardousmaterialsandschoolswouldbelessthanconsiderable.4344ThemajorityoftheproposedprojectcomponentsarelocatedinareasidentifiedbyCALFIREas45VeryHighFireHazardSeverityZones(CALFIRE2007a,2007b,2008,2010).Construction,46operation,andmaintenanceactivitiesassociatedwiththeproposedprojectwouldincreasefirerisk47duringrefueling,vehicleandequipmentuse,welding,vegetationclearing,andotheractivities.48However,theprojectwouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicablelawsandregulationsregarding49
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐25 FINAL EIR
firesafetysuchasCaliforniaPublicResourcesCodeSections4291through4299,whichregulate1vegetationmanagement,andCPUCGeneralOrders95and165relatedtosubtransmissionline2construction.TheapplicantwouldalsoberequiredtodevelopaFireControlandEmergency3ResponsePlan,incoordinationwithlocalfiredepartments,toidentifyfirepreventionmeasuresand4responseandcommunicationprotocols.Althoughmostoftheprojectsinthecumulativescenario5areplannedindisturbedurbanareasthatarelesssusceptibletofire,anumberofadditionalSCE6projectsareplannedintheimmediatevicinityoftheproposedprojectthatposeasimilarriskof7wildlandfire.However,theseprojectswouldalsoberequiredtocomplywithapplicablefederal,8state,andlocallawsrelatedtofireprevention,designfeatures,andoperationalmeasures.Impacts9relatedtofirewouldbeaddressedbytheproposedprojectandotherprojectsinthecumulative10scenarioonaproject‐specificbasis,andtheoverallcumulativeimpactwouldnotbesignificant.11Therefore,theproposedproject’scontributiontocumulativeimpactsrelatedtofirehazardswould12belessthanconsiderable.13146.1.3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality 1516Scope and Geographic Extent 17
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactsrelatedtohydrologyandwaterqualityisanyproject18thatcouldviolatewaterqualitystandards,impactgroundwatersupplies,alterexistingdrainage19patternsinamannerthatwouldresultinsubstantialerosionorsiltationorresultinflooding,20impedeorredirectfloodflowsorotherwisecontributetoariskofloss,injury,ordeathinvolving21water‐relatedhazards.Thegeographicextentforconsideringproject‐relatedcumulativeimpactson22hydrologyandwaterqualityincludesprojectswithin5‐milesofproposedprojectcomponents23becausethisdistanceencompassesthemajorityoftheareasofthesub‐watershedsthattheproject24crosses.2526Existing Cumulative Conditions 27
Theregionalwatershedsinthecumulativestudyareaincludecoastalcreeksassociatedwith28perennialsprings,seeps,andstormwaterrunoff.Majorwaterwaysinthecumulativeprojectarea29includeFranklinCreek,CarpinteriaCreek,RinconCreekandtheVenturaRiver.Surfacewater30qualityinthecumulativeprojectareaisaffectedbyagriculture,urbanrunoff,andland31development.FederalEmergencyManagementAgency‐designatedFloodHazardZonesarepresent32throughouttheproposedprojectregion.3334Thereasonablyforeseeableprojectsincludedinthecumulativescenario(Table6‐1)wouldinvolve35constructionprojectsthatwouldresultinincreasedimpervioussurfaces,excavationandgrading36activities,andconstructionofbuildings,homes,andotherstructureswhichcouldaffecthydrology37andwaterqualityinthecumulativestudyarea.3839Cumulative Impact Analysis 40
AsdiscussedinSection4.9,“HydrologyandWaterQuality,”impactsonhydrologyandwaterquality41wouldbelessthansignificantafterapplicationofAPMs,andcompliancewithNationalPollutant42DischargeEliminationSystempermittingrequirements,CleanWaterActpermittingrequirements,43CaliforniaFishandGameCodeSection1600requirements,andapplicablelocalregulationssuchas44floodcontrolordinancesandgradingpermits.Activitiesrelatedtocumulativeprojectswould45likewisebelessthansignificant,becausetheprojectdeveloperswouldberequiredtoimplement46similarmeasures;therefore,theproject’spotentialimpactsonhydrologyandwaterresources47wouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderable.48
49
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐26 FINAL EIR
6.1.3.10 Land Use and Planning 12AsdiscussedinSection4.10,“LandUseandPlanning,”theproposedprojectwouldnotphysically3divideanestablishedcommunity,conflictwithanyapplicablelanduseplan,policy,orregulationof4anagencywithjurisdictionovertheprojectadoptedforthepurposeofavoidingormitigatingan5environmentaleffect,orconflictwithanyapplicableHabitatConservationPlanorNatural6CommunityConservationPlan.Giventhattheproposedproject’simpactonthisresourcearea7wouldbeminoratmost,theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinacumulativelyconsiderable8impactrelatedtolanduseandplanning.9106.1.3.11 Noise 1112Scope and Geographic Extent 13
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativenoiseimpactsincludesanyprojectthatwouldresultinan14increaseinambientdaytimenoiselevels.Thegeographicextentforconsideringcumulativenoise15impactsisanyprojectwithin0.5milesoftheprojectcomponentareas,becauseanyproject16operatingwithinthenoisestandardsestablishedbytheapplicablelocaljurisdictionsatthis17distancewouldnotcontributetoincreasesinambientnoiselevelsatthenearestsensitivereceptors18totheproposedprojectcomponentareas.1920Existing Cumulative Conditions 21
Theambientnoisesurveyconductedbytheapplicantatseverallocationsoftheproposedproject22components,includingthreelocationsalongSegment3B,twolocationsalongSegment4,oneatthe23SantaClaraSubstation,oneattheCasitasSubstation,andoneattheCarpinteriaSubstation,24indicatedambientnoiselevelsbetween38and64dBALeq(ARCADIS2012),asdiscussedinSection254.11,“Noise.”2627Theonlyotherprojectslocatedwithinthegeographicextentforconsideringcumulativenoise28impactsareotherSCEprojects.ItisnotanticipatedthatworkonanyoftheSCEprojectsinthe29cumulativescenariowilltakeplaceatthesametimeandwithin0.5milesofworkbeingconducted30ontheproposedproject.3132Cumulative Impact Analysis 33
AsdiscussedinSection4.11,“Noise,”theproposedprojectcouldresultinshort‐termincreasesin34noiselevelsduringconstruction.ImplementationofAPMsandappropriatemitigationwouldensure35thattheseimpactswouldbelessthansignificant.3637Otherprojectswithinthecumulativestudyareawouldalsocontributetoincreasesinnoiselevels38duringtheirconstructionperiods,whichmayoverlap;suchincreaseswouldtakeplacein39compliancewithpoliciesandregulationsofapplicablelocaljurisdictionsfornoisefromsuch40sources.Becausethecontributionoftheproposedprojecttoambientnoiselevelsatthenearest41sensitivereceptorwouldbelessthansignificant,andbecauseallsuchnoiseimpactsfromother42projectswithinthecumulativeanalysisareawouldberequiredtocomplywithpoliciesand43regulationsofapplicablelocaljurisdictions,theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinacumulatively44considerableimpactinrelationtonoise.4546
47
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐27 FINAL EIR
6.1.3.12 Population and Housing 12AsdiscussedinSection4.12,“PopulationandHousing,”althoughsomeconstructionworkersmay3traveltotheregionduringtheconstructionperiod,theproposedprojectwouldnotinduce4populationgrowthinthearea,eitherdirectlyorindirectly.Itwouldalsonotdisplaceanyexisting5housingorpeople,necessitatingtheconstructionofreplacementhousingelsewhere,anditwould6notdisruptthebalancebetweenemploymentopportunitiesandavailablehousinginthearea.Given7thattheproposedproject’simpactonthisresourceareawouldbetemporarilyandnegligibleat8most,theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinaconsiderablecontributiontocumulativeimpacts9relatedtopopulationandhousing.10116.1.3.13 Public Services and Utilities 1213AsdiscussedinSection4.13,“PublicServicesandUtilities,”theproposedprojectisnotexpectedto14resultinadditionaluseofpublicservicesinlocaljurisdictionsthatwouldnotresultinsubstantial15adversephysicalimpactsassociatedwithprovisionofneworphysicallyalteredpublicservice16facilities.Theproposedprojectwouldnotresultintheneedforneworphysicallyalteredpublic17servicefacilitiesinordertomaintainacceptableserviceratios,responsetimes,orother18performanceobjectivesforanyofthepublicservices.Giventhattheproposedproject’simpacton19thisresourceareawouldbeminoratmost,theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinaconsiderable20contributiontocumulativeimpactsrelatedtopublicservicesandutilities.21226.1.3.14 Recreation 2324AsdiscussedinSection4.14,“Recreation,”theapplicantwouldusealocalworkforcetoconstruct25theproposedproject.Intheeventthatanon‐localcontractorishiredforconstructionofthe26proposedproject,itispossiblethatupto105workerswouldtemporarilyrelocatetotheproposed27projectareaforthedurationofconstruction.Therelocatedworkerswouldhaveatemporary28negligibleimpactontheuseofexistingrecreationalfacilitiesduringconstruction.Therefore,the29proposedprojectwouldnotresultinaconsiderablecontributiontocumulativeimpactsrelatedto30recreationresources.31326.1.1.15 Transportation and Traffic 3334Scope and Geographic Extent 35
Thescopeforconsideringcumulativeimpactsrelatedtotrafficandtransportationincludesany36projectthatwould,alongwiththeproposedproject,conflictwithanapplicableplan,ordinance,or37policyestablishingmeasuresfortheperformanceofthecirculationsystem,conflictwithan38applicablecongestionmanagementprogram,resultinchangeinairtrafficpatterns,substantially39increasehazardsduetodesignfeaturesorincompatibleuses,resultininadequateemergency40access,orconflictwithadoptedpolicies,plans,orprograms,regardingpublictransit,bicycle,or41pedestrianfacilities,orotherwisedecreasetheperformanceorsafetyofsuchfacilities..Therefore,42thegeographicandtemporalextentforconsideringcumulativeimpactsrelatedtotrafficand43transportationincludesallregionalandlocalroadwaysthatmaybeusedtoaccesstheproposed44projectorthatcouldotherwisebeimpactedbytheproposedprojectduringconstruction.4546
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐28 FINAL EIR
Existing Cumulative Conditions 1
Theoperationalefficiencyoftrafficistypicallymeasuredbylevelofservice(LOS),atraffic2performancemetricestablishedbytheTransportationResearchBoard’sHighwayCapacityManual.3LOSisbasedonvolume‐to‐capacityratio,whichcomparesroadwaycapacitytoleveloftraffic4duringpeakhours.Roadwaysandintersectionsthatareatornearcapacityexperiencegreater5congestionandcorrespondingtrafficdelay.Thehighestrankedroadwaysaredesignated“LOSA,”6representingfree‐flowingtraffic,andthelowestrankedroadwaysaredesignated“LOSF,”7representingextremecongestion.Theroadwaysthatmaybeusedduringconstructionand8operationoftheproposedprojectoperateatLOSAthroughLOSDduringtheAMandPMpeak9hours,dependingontheparticularsegmentofroadwayanddirectionoftravel(seeTable4.15‐4)10(SBCAG2009).Mostoftheintersectionsthatmaybeusedduringconstructionandoperationofthe11proposedprojectoperatebetweenLOSAandLOSC,althoughtheUS‐101northboundoff‐ramto12CasitasPassRoadoperatesatLOSFduringtheAMpeak(seeTable4.15‐5)(FehrandPeers13TransportationConsultants2007;CityofVentura2005).1415Therearethreepublicairportswithinthevicinityoftheproposedprojectandoneprivateairport16locatedinSantaPaulaeastoftheSantaClaraSubstation.Helicopterswouldbeusedduring17constructionoftheproposedproject,buthelicopterfuelingandlandingareaswouldbelimitedto18accessandspurroadlocationsand14helicopterlandingareasalongSegments1,2,and4.1920Cumulative Impact Analysis 21
Trafficandtransportationrelatedimpactsareinherentlycumulativeinnaturebecauseimpactsto22theoperationalefficiency,orstructuralintegrity,ofthecirculationsystemresultfromvehicles23originatingfromavarietyofsources.Althoughalloftheprojectsinthecumulativescenariohave24potentialtoaddvehicletripstothesamesegmentsofroadsand/orintersectionsthatmaybe25affectedbytheproposedproject,itisimpossibletoquantitativelyassesswhethertheprojects26wouldresultinacumulativelyconsiderableimpactwithoutadditionaldata(e.g.,wherevehicletrips27originatefrom,howmanyvehicletripsareneededtosupportaparticularproject,whenthevehicle28tripsoccur).Toassistindeterminingwhethertrafficresultingfromaproposedprojectwouldresult29inasignificantimpactrelatedtotrafficandtransportation,manyjurisdictionsdevelopsignificance30thresholds.Significancethresholdsmaybebasedonaproject’spotentialto:increasethevolume‐to‐31capacityofaroadwayorintersectionbyasetamount,resultinachangeintheLOSratingofa32roadwayorintersection,createaneedforroadwayimprovements,oraddaveragedailytripstoa33roadwaywheretheEstimatedFutureVolumeexceedsasetpolicycapacity.Projectsthatexceeda34significancethresholdmayberequiredtomitigatetheincreasedtrafficasaconditionofreceiving35discretionaryapproval.Managingincreasedtrafficonaproject‐by‐projectbasisreducesthe36potentialforanindividualprojecttoresultinacumulativelyconsiderableimpactrelatedtotraffic37andtransportation.3839AsdiscussedinSection4.15,“TrafficandTransportation,”theproposedprojectwouldnotconflict40withtheCityofCarpinteriaEnvironmentalReviewGuidelines,theCityofVenturaGeneralPlan,the41SantaBarbaraCountyComprehensivePlan,theSantaBarbaraCountyEnvironmentalThresholds42andGuidelinesManual,ortheVenturaCountyGeneralPlan.TheCityofCarpinteriaGeneralPlan43statesthatnoprojectshallcontributefiveormorepeakhourtripstoanintersectionoperatingatan44estimatedfutureLOSF,andtheprojectplanstouseUS‐101northboundoff‐ramtoCasitasPass45Roadintersection,whichoperatesatLOSFduringtheAMpeak.However,implementationofthe46trafficcontrolplan(MMTT‐1)andCommuterPlan(MMTT‐2)wouldensurethatAMpeakhouruse47oftheUS‐101northboundoff‐ramptoCasitasPassRoadintersectionisavoided.Thereforethe48
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐29 FINAL EIR
proposedprojectwouldnotconflictwithanapplicableplan,ordinance,orpolicyestablishing1measuresofeffectivenessfortheperformanceofthecirculationsystem.23Liketheproposedproject,otherprojectsinthecumulativescenariowouldberequiredtocomply4withallapplicableplans,ordinances,andpoliciesthatestablishmeasuresofeffectivenessforthe5performanceofthecirculationsystem.Therefore,anyimpactsunderthiscriterionresultingfrom6theproposedprojectandotherprojectsinthecumulativescenariowouldbelessthansignificant,7andincreasedtrafficresultingfromtheproposedprojectwouldbelessthancumulatively8considerable.910Theproposedprojectwouldusehelicoptersforconstructionworkassociatedwithtransportation11ofconstructionworks,deliveryofequipmentandmaterialstostructuresites,structureplacement,12hardwareinstallation,conductorandtelecommunicationsstringingoperations,andinstallationof13markerballs.HelicopteroperationswouldbeconductedinaccordancewithapplicableFAA14regulationsandOSHArequirements.Helicopterswouldonlybeusedonatemporarybasisduring15construction.Theonlyprojectsinthecumulativescenariothatarelikelytorequiretheuseof16helicoptersareotherSCEprojects,suchastheCarpinteria‐VenturaFiberOpticCableProjectand17theSantaClara‐Colonia66‐kVSubtransmissionLineReconductorProject.Helicopteruseforthese18projectsisnotexpectedtooverlapwithhelicopterusefortheproposedproject.Therefore,the19projectwouldnotresultincumulativeimpactstoairtrafficpatterns,andtheproject’scontribution20tochangesinairtrafficpatternswouldbelessthancumulativelyconsiderable.21226.2 Growth‐inducing Impacts 2324Aprojectcouldinducegrowthifitresultsinadditionaldevelopment,suchasanincreasein25population,employmentand/orhousingaboveandbeyondwhatisalreadyassumedwilloccurin26localandregionallanduseplansorinprojectionsmadebyregionalplanningauthorities,27irrespectiveoftheproposedproject.UnderCEQA(Section15126.2[d]),aprojectwouldbegrowth28inducingifit:2930
Directlyorindirectlyfosterseconomicorpopulationgrowthortheconstructionof31additionalhousing;32
Taxescommunityfacilitiestotheextentthattheconstructionofnewfacilitieswouldbe33necessary;34
Removesobstaclestopopulationgrowth;or35
Encouragesorfacilitatesotheractivitiesthatcausesignificantenvironmentaleffects.3637Typicalgrowth‐inducingfactorsmightincludetheextensionofurbanservicesortransportation38infrastructuretoapreviouslyunservedorunder‐servedareaortheremovalofmajorbarriersto39development.Thissectionevaluatestheproposedproject’spotentialtocreatesuchgrowth40inducements.Growthinducementcanbepositiveornegativedependingontheresultingeffectsand41thedevelopmentobjectivesoftheplanningauthoritiesintheproposedprojectarea.Negative42impactsassociatedwithgrowthinducementwouldoccuronlywheregrowthassociatedwiththe43proposedprojectwouldresultinsignificant/adverseenvironmentalimpacts.4445Theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinpopulationgrowththroughdirectorindirectemployment46ofworkersneededtoconstructandoperatethefacilities.Constructionlabordemandswouldbe47
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐30 FINAL EIR
metbytheapplicant’sexistingemployeesorbyhiringasmallnumberofspecializedelectrical1transmissioncontractors.Thesmallnumberofpositionsrequiredduringtheconstructionphase2wouldnotdirectlyorindirectlyinduceanypopulationgrowthinthearea.O&Mactivitieswouldbe3carriedoutbytheapplicant’sexistingemployeesandwouldnotrequireanyadditionalhiringof4operationpersonnel.Exceptforroutinemaintenance,theproposedprojectinfrastructurewouldbe5unmannedduringoperation.Therefore,neitherconstructionnoroperationoftheproposedproject6woulddirectlyorindirectlyinducepopulationgrowthinthearea.78Thelocalcommunitiesinthevicinityoftheproposedprojecthaveadequateinfrastructureand9servicestomeettheneedsoftemporaryworkers,includinganumberofhotelsandmotels(Cityof10Carpinteria2013b;VenturaVisitorsandConventionBureau2013).Accordingtothe2010Census,11theCityofVenturahadarentalvacancyrateof5.5percent,whichindicatesanadequatesupplyof12rentalhousinginVentura(CityofVentura2013).TherentalvacancyrateintheCityofCarpinteria13was12.3percentasofJune,2012,alsosuggestingthatthereisanadequatesupplyofrentalhousing14inCarpinteria(Sperling’sBestPlaces2013).Inaddition,theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinor15requireconstructionofanyneworupgradedcommunityfacilities,wouldnotbuildpublicroads16thatwouldprovidenewaccesstoundevelopedorunderdevelopedareas,andwouldnotextend17publicservicestonewareas.Theapplicant’soperationalstafflevelswouldremainthesameas18requiredforcurrentO&Mactivities,andoperationoftheproposedprojectwouldnotcreatelong‐19termdemandsforemergencyresponseservices,schools,drinkingwater,parks,libraries,hospitals,20orsolidwasteandwastewaterfacilitiesthatcouldnotbemetbyexistingservicesandfacilities(see21Section4.13,“PublicServicesandUtilities”).Therefore,constructionandoperationoftheproposed22Projectwouldnottaxcommunityfacilitiestotheextentthattheconstructionofnewfacilitieswould23benecessary.2425Thepurposeoftheproposedprojectistoensuretheavailabilityofsafeandreliableelectricservice26tomeetcustomerdemandintheElectricalNeedsArea(ENA)duringemergencyconditions.The27proposedprojectwouldnotprovidenewelectricalservicethatmightinduceeconomicor28populationgrowthandhasnotbeendesignedtoprovidenewelectricalservicetoareasthatare29currentlyunservedorunder‐served.Electricaldemandisnotanticipatedtoexceedthecurrent30capacityundernormaloperatingconditionsintheENAwithinthecurrent10‐yearplanningperiod.31GrowthinSantaBarbaraCounty,VenturaCounty,andlocalcommunitiesisplannedandregulated32byapplicablelocalgeneralplansandzoningordinances.Theprovisionofelectricityisgenerallynot33consideredanobstacletogrowth,andtheavailabilityofelectricalcapacitybyitselfdoesnot34normallyencouragegrowth.Otherfactorssuchaseconomicconditions,landandwatersupply35availability,andlocalplanningpolicieshaveamoredirecteffectongrowth.Therefore,theproposed36projectwouldnotremoveobstaclestopopulationgrowth.3738Theproposedprojectwouldreducetheriskofprolongedelectricaloutagesduringemergency39conditions.Itwouldnotencouragepopulationgrowthornewresidential,commercial,industrial,or40agriculturalconstruction.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotencourageorfacilitateother41activitiesthatcouldsignificantlyaffecttheenvironment.4243Theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinincreasesinemployment,housing,ordemandsfor44communityfacilitiesandservicesnorresultintheremovalofexistingconstraintstogrowthorthe45creationoffactorsthatencourageorfacilitatedevelopmentthatwouldnototherwisehave46occurred.Therefore,implementationoftheproposedprojectwouldnotresultinanygrowth‐47inductingimpacts.4849
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐31 FINAL EIR
6.3 Significant and Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 12AsfurtherdiscussedinSection4.3,“AirQuality,”theproposedprojectwouldresultinROG,NOx,3PM10,andPM2.5emissionsduringthefirstyearofconstructionthatwouldexceedtheapplicable4constructionemissionthresholds.Impactsonairqualitystandardswouldbesignificantand5unavoidableduringthefirstyearofconstructionaftertheimplementationofallfeasiblemitigation.6Additionally,thefirstyearofconstructionwouldresultinincreasedROG,NOx,andPM10emissions7inSBCAPCD,whichisdesignatedasnonattainmentforNOx,ROG,andPM10withrespecttoCAAQS,8andwouldbecumulativelyconsiderableaftertheimplementationofallfeasiblemitigation.9AsdiscussedinSection6.1.3.3,thefirstyearofconstructionwouldresultinROG,NOx,PM10,and10PM2.5duringthefirstyearofconstructionthatwouldexceedtheapplicableconstructionemission11thresholdsandwouldsignificantlycontributetoacumulativeimpactonairqualityafterthe12implementationofallfeasiblemitigation.1314CEQAGuidelinesSection15093allowsthedecision‐makingagencytodetermineifthebenefitsofa15projectmayoutweighitsunavoidableadverseenvironmentalimpacts.TheCaliforniaPublic16UtilitiesCommissionmayprepareaStatementofOverridingConsiderationstoapproveaproject17withunavoidableadverseimpactsifitsetsforththespecificreasonsformakingsuchajudgment.18196.4 Significant and Irreversible Environmental Changes 2021CEQAGuidelines(Section15126.2[c])requirethatanEIRidentifysignificantirreversible22environmentalchangesthatwouldbecausedbytheproposedproject.Thesechangesmayinclude,23forexample,usesofnonrenewableresources,provisionofaccesstopreviouslyinaccessibleareas,24oraccidentsthatcouldchangetheenvironmentinthelongterm.Significantirreversiblechangesto25andirretrievablecommitmentsofresourcescouldoccurfromconstructionandoperationofthe26proposedprojectasaresultofenergyandmaterialsconsumption,damagefromfire,land27disturbance(andassociatedhabitatlossforsensitivebiologicalresources),anddamagetoorthe28lossofculturalorpaleontologicalresources.2930Constructionoftheproposedprojectwouldrequireapermanentcommitmentofnaturalresources31fromthedirectconsumptionoffossilfuels,constructionmaterials,andenergyrequiredforthe32productionofmaterialsaswellasthemanufactureofnewcomponentsthatlargelycannotbe33recycledattheendoftheproject’susefullifetime(seeChapter2,ProjectDescription).Asdiscussed34inSection4.2,AgricultureandForestryResources,constructionoftheproposedprojectwouldresult35inthepermanentconversionoflandsidentifiedasimportantfarmland.Duringconstructionand36operationthereisalsotheriskofimpactsonundiscoveredculturaland/orpaleontological37resources.Theproposedprojectswouldalsoresultinirreversibleimpactsonairqualitydueto38emissionsofNOx,ROG,andotherpollutantsandgreenhousegasesduringconstruction.3940Accidents,suchasthereleaseofhazardousmaterials,cantriggerirreversibleenvironmental41damage.AsdiscussedinSection4.8,HazardsandHazardousMaterials,constructionandoperation42oftheproposedprojectwouldinvolvetheuseofsmallquantitiesofhazardousmaterialssuchas43gasoline,dieselfuel,transmissionfluid,brakefluid,hydraulicfluid,solvents,motoroils,and44lubricatinggrease.Anaccidentalspillofanyofthesesubstancescouldimpactwaterquality,45biologicalresources,andcouldposeahazardtopeopleifalargespillweretooccur.However,given46thesmallvolumesofthesematerialsandmandatorycompliancewithapplicableregulations(as47describedinSection4.8)aimedatpreventingspills,orreducingtheseverityofaspillshouldit48occur,accidentsresultinginsignificantenvironmentalorhealtheffectsareunlikely.49
50
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RELIABILITY PROJECT
6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
MAY 2015 6‐32 FINAL EIR
12345678
Thispageintentionallyblank.9