DRM A Progress Report NASB Conference May 9 th & 10 th , 2012
6 th Progress Report on Social and Economic Cohesion
description
Transcript of 6 th Progress Report on Social and Economic Cohesion
1 / 21
6th Progress Reporton Social and Economic
Cohesion
The debate on Territorial Cohesion
&Regional Creativity and
Innovation
2 / 21
6th Progress Report
• Focus is on creativity and innovation and how they contribute to regional development
• The report also includes a short summary of the consultation on the Territorial cohesion Green Paper
3 / 21
Regional creativity and innovation
Generating a new and useful idea and putting it into practice
4 / 21
Creativity
• Creativity is fuelled by interaction of different, talented people
• Stimulate local talent• Attract foreign talent• Encourage tolerance• Boost ICT
5 / 21
Boosting local talent• Education and training
can stimulate creativity
• Large differences remain in terms of secondary and tertiary educational attainment
• Capitals tend to score high due to proximity to universities and (internal) migration of graduates
6 / 21
Women are gaining more education• On average, women now
have almost the same education level as men.
• In one out two regions, women have a higher educational level than men
• Women aged 25-34 are in virtually all regions more educated than those aged 55-64
• Women aged 25-34 now tend to be more educated than men in the same age group
7 / 21
New People New IdeasForeign born, 2007
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Convergence Transition RCE
% of
popu
lati
on
1
5-6
4
8 / 21
Unemployment shrunk and converged since 2000
Unemployment rate 2007 and evolution 2000 - 2007
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Convergence Transition RCE
% o
f a
cti
ve po
pula
tion
-5.0
-4.5
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
% p
oin
t c
ha
ng
e
Unemployment rate
Change
9 / 21
GDP per head continues to converge
GDP/ head (PPS) 2006 and evolution 2000-2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Convergence Transition RCE
index E
U2
7=
10
0
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
index p
oin
t ch
an
ge
GDP per head
Change in GDP per head
10 / 21
Employment rate have increased but not converged
Employment rate 2007 and evolution 2000-2007
52
55
58
61
64
67
70
73
Convergence Transition RCE
% o
f popula
tion 1
5-6
4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
% p
oin
t ch
ange 2
000-2
007
Employment rate
Change in employment rate
11 / 21
Tolerance is fairly high, but decreasing for ethnic minorities• In the EU four out five are
comfortable with a woman, or someone with different ethnicity, a different religion or a disability or a homosexual in the highest elected political position or as a neighbour
• Comfort levels are lowest for people with a different ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation
• But most people thought ethnic discrimination had increased over the past five years.
12 / 21
Core Creative class • Core creative class is
high in capitals and other urban regions especially in high-tech regions with many tertiary educated and foreign born residents
• The core creative class are likely to be innovative and entrepreneurial leading to more jobs and growth
• They like tolerant places
13 / 21
Innovation
• New Firms– Start-ups– New Foreign Firms
• In existing firms– R&D– Technological innovation– Non-technological innovation
14 / 21
New Firms more innovationFDI high in new Member States
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
LuxembourgIrelandSpain
NetherlandsSweden
DenmarkFrance
GermanyItaly
AustriaGreece
SloveniaPortugalFinland
United KingdomBelgiumHungary
PolandLithuania
CyprusSlovakia
Czech RepublicLatvia
RomaniaEstonia
MaltaBulgaria
Average Annual average net FDI in share of GDP, 2005-2007, in %
15 / 21
Ease of starting a business, World Bank 2009• Only six EU MS are in the World
Bank top 20: Ireland, UK, France, Denmark, Finland and Belgium
• At least 100 countries score better than Germany, Austria, Greece, Spain and Poland
• Easing the creation of start-ups and allowing them to grow fast will improve innovation, growth and jobs
CountryStarting a Business
Ireland 5United Kingdom 8France 14Denmark 16Finland 18Belgium 20Estonia 23Romania 26Hungary 27Sweden 30Portugal 34Latvia 35Slovenia 41Slovakia 48Netherlands 51Italy 53Luxembourg 69Lithuania 74Bulgaria 81Czech Republic 86Germany 102Austria 104Greece 133Spain 140Poland 145
16 / 21
Productivity is catching upProductivity in industry and services
2006
0
25
50
75
100
125
Convergence Transition RCE
index E
U2
7=
10
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Avera
ge a
nn
ual re
al pro
du
ctiv
ity g
row
th,
20
00
-2
00
6
Productivity
ProductivityGrowth
17 / 21
Innovation in firms: R&D and others
R&D expenditure in the business enterprise sector 2006 and evolution 2000-2006
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
Convergence Transition RCE
% o
f G
DP
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
%
poin
ts
of
GD
P
R&D
Change
18 / 21
Conclusion• Convergence regions
– Embed FDI– Boost educational
attainment and training
– Stimulate tourism
• Transition regions– Shift from efficiency
to innovation– Boost training– Increase R&D– Attract more FDI
• RCE regions– Invest in innovation– Speed up transition
idea to market place– Integrate migrants in
labour market
• All regions– Facilitate start-ups,
especially high-growth– Reduce discrimination– Invest in education
and human capital
19 / 21
Territorial Cohesion: the debate• Support for the three Cs (concentration,
connections and cooperation)• Functional approaches are endorsed• Local development is highlighted• Some raise the geographic specificities but
little support for separate policies of funds for each specificity
20 / 21
Cooperation
• Territorial cooperation is an excellent example of European value added and should be reinforced
• Crossborder cooperation: one budget? More eligible actions?
• European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation
• Transnational cooperation: Baltic Sea, Danube…
• Interregional cooperation
21 / 21
Impacts and measurements
• European policies with a strong territorial impact should be better coordinated by fine-tuning existing instruments
• The understanding and measurement of territorial trends and dynamics should be enhanced
• Favourable mention of ESPON and the Urban Audit