6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Footer Text Date PERFORMANCE-BASED MAINTENANCE APPROACH DB/P3 Edward P....
21
6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
-
Upload
josef-manchester -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of 6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Footer Text Date PERFORMANCE-BASED MAINTENANCE APPROACH DB/P3 Edward P....
6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
Footer Text Date
PERFORMANCE-BASED MAINTENANCE APPROACH DB/P3Edward P. Pensock, Jr. P.E.Strategic Project Division DirectorTexas Department of Transportation
Does not include private financing
Not a prescriptive design
Innovation by the Developer
Review at project level as packages are released
Coordination with FHWA as needed
May include optional Capital Maintenance Agreement
Limited to 3 projects per fiscal year approved by Commission
Construction must be estimated at $50 million or more
Design-Build vs. CDA Contracts
3
Similar to D-B, but may be done as:
— Toll Concession
— Design-Build Finance(f)
— Design-Build-Operate-Maintain
— Design-Build-Maintain
— Design-Build
Use of independent engineer
More risk transfer than D-B
May include private financing
Limited to specific projects identified in Senate Bill 1730
CDADesign-Build
11
4
Delivery Methods: Risk Allocation Assignments1
Risk Type
Project Delivery Method / CDA Business Model
Design-Build Concession
Environmental Approval
OwnerTraffic & Revenue
Financing
Operation & Maintenance
Environmental Compliance
SharedROW Acquisition2
Utility Delays
Design
DeveloperConstruction
Schedule Delays
1 Actual risk assignments may vary by project2 Eminent Domain delays retained by the owner
TxDOT Business Programs
DB/P3 Maintenance Contracts
Developer responsible for design, construction, operations, maintenance and handback
Long term 15-25 years Mandatory O&M Period
5 to15 year O&M Performance Requirements may apply to a DB + CMA
5
Performance-Based Approach
Technical Provisions
– TxDOT defines desired project outcome in the technical
requirements
– General Maintenance Obligations
– Maintenance Management Plan (Reviewed and
Approved by TxDOT)
• Performance requirements, • Measurement procedures, • Threshold values at which maintenance is required, • Inspection procedures and frequencies, and • Subsequent maintenance to address noted deficiencies, • Impacts to Related Transportation Facilities
6
Compensation to TxDOT resulting from Maintenance Contractor’s failure to meet the performance requirements.
Maintenance Agreements
Comprehensive Maintenance Agreements and Capital Maintenance Agreements
Option for maintenance agreements if pricing acceptable
Achieves price certainty
Efficient for projects with unique features
Beneficial to achieving long-term ownership of design by the developer
Non-compliance handled through Non-compliance Points or Liquidated Damages
7
• Non-Compliance Events
• D&C Work
• O&M Work
• Non-Compliance Points
• Payment Deductions
• Increased oversight if triggers are exceeded
• Warning notice of default if points accumulate and exceed threshold
• Liquidated Damages
• Unplanned lane closures
• Safety defect not repaired
O&M Agreements Examples
8
Concession (50 year term of contract): SH 130 Segments 5 & 6
North Tarrant Expressway Segments 1 & 2
I-635 LBJ Freeway
Design/Build (three-5 year Capital Maintenance Agreements): SH 130 Segments 1 - 4
DFW Connector Dallas
Dallas Horseshoe
SH 99 (Grand Parkway) Segments F1, F2, and G
IH 35E Managed Lanes Project
Loop 1604 Western Extension
O&M Agreements Examples
9
Design-Build – Extended Comprehensive Maintenance Agreements (COMA)
SH 183 Managed Lanes –
25 year maintenance responsibility (also includes five year extended construction financing)
Loop 375 Border Highway West –
15 year maintenance responsibility
Questions?
Edward P. Pensock, Jr., P.E.Strategic Projects DivisionTexas Department of TransportationOffice: 512-936-0903 E-Mail: [email protected]
10
6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN TxDOT’STOTAL MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION
John RobertsTxDOT Maintenance DivisionPerformance-Based Contracts
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
13
Internal Input Industry Input Effect Measures of Performance
Meeting with internal personnel to develop expectations of performance that are realistic/desired.
Evaluate input to provide consistency of expectations statewide.
Goal = buy-in
14
INTERNAL INPUT
15
INDUSTRY INPUT
Are our expectations realistic?
Bring good ideas for better execution.
Have we provided clear communication of expectations?
Goal = decrease risk during execution
16
EFFECT MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE
Condition Assessment
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
Payment Reduction Strategy
Goal = Perform. Get Paid
Don’t Perform. Don’t Get Paid
17
WHAT ARE THE RESULTS?
Contractor PerformanceCategory Criteria %(1)
Quality Condition Assessment Element Score 8 Condition Assessment Component Score Pavement & Bridges 16 Traffic Operations 8 Roadside 8 Condition Assessment Overall Assessment 10Safety Safety Key Performance Indicators 20Timeliness Time Key Performance Indicators 30
(1) % represents the potential percentage reduction in payment each month. 100
18
WHAT ARE THE RESULTS?
Failure to submit the initial Quality Management Plan within the first 60 days = 5% reduction in payment the 1st month & then a 10 % reduction in payment thereafter.
Failure to submit the Safety Plan within the first 30 days = 5% percent reduction in payment in the 1st month & a 10% reduction in payment each month thereafter.
Others
19
EXAMPLE KPIs
Safety KPI Traffic Control
Perform Traffic Control Compliant with TMUTCD, TCP Standards, and BC Standards
Implement compliant TCP.
Implement noncompliant TCP corrective actions within 30 minutes of notification.
Time KPIAsphaltic Pavement Surfaces
Repair potholes and pavement failures.
Temporary - within 1 hour rural and 2 hours urban and metro.
Permanent - within 30 days.
20
KPI PAYMENT METHODOLOGY
# of Meeting Requirements/Total # of Occurrences = % Compliance
Safety Time
Range Payment Range Payment
100% +1% 95% +0.5% 95% > 90% 0% 100% > 90% 0%90% > 85% -2% 90% > 85% -2%85% > 80% -5% 85% > 80% -5%80% > 75% -10% 80% > 75% -10%75% > 70% -20% 75% > 70% -20%
70% > 50% -30%
